Primary Care Behavioral Health Research Articles

Penetration rates of behavioral health consultants targeting cardiovascular disease and associated modifiable risk factors among military health care beneficiaries.

Targeting cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its associated risk factors is important not only in the general population, but also among those served by the military health care system. The primary care behavioral health model of integrating behavioral health consultants (BHCs) into a primary care setting is one method for enhancing how these modifiable risk factors are addressed; however, it is unknown how often BHCs are used to target those with biopsychosocial factors contributing to CVD and those with diagnosed CVD. The present study evaluated what percentage of primary care patients with diagnosed CVD risk factors (i.e., tobacco use, obesity, and depression) or diagnosed CVD were referred to BHCs. Data were drawn from electronic health records of U.S. military primary care clinics over the 3-year period from January 2017 to December 2019. A total of 1,321,072 unique individuals were included. Among the sample, 37.1% were active duty, 40.6% were married, 43.8% were female, and 30.9% were between 45 and 64 years old. The study revealed penetration rates of 1.5% (8,577 of 583,659 patients) for patients diagnosed with CVD, 5.3% (10,286 of 192,566 patients) of those demonstrating tobacco use, 3.4% (8,765 of 256,852 patients) of those demonstrating obesity, and 20.0% (31,125 of 155,656 patients) of those diagnosed with depression. These findings suggest that BHCs are underutilized for targeting CVD and some associated risk factors in military primary care clinics. Research should explore whether these findings replicate in other health care systems and implement methods to improve BHC utilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Exploratory Factor Analysis of a Patient-Facing PCBH Adherence Measure: The PPAQ-Patient.

Model adherence indicates the degree to which a program or intervention is delivered as intended. In integrated primary care, where mental health services are embedded into primary care clinics, appraisal of model adherence provides insight into whether these services align with key features of this unique practice environment (e.g., brief, interdisciplinary care). To date, such evaluations have emphasized system and provider factors. This study is a preliminary evaluation of whether a novel patient-facing measure, the Primary Care Behavioral Health Provider Adherence Questionnaire-Patient Version (PPAQ-Patient), can provide insight into adherence to the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model of integrated primary care. Survey data were collected from 281 veterans who received PCBH care. Exploratory factor analyses evaluated the data structure. Results suggest that 19 items spanning three temporally-referenced subscales may feasibly capture patient perspectives on PCBH adherence at various stages of treatment. Future work is needed to refine the measure.

A Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 for Children With Developmental Delays and Disorders.

Primary care physicians (PCPs) frequently serve pediatric patients with developmental delays and disorders (DD/D). Although the most widely used primary care behavioral health screener, the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17), is validated for use with children without DD/D, it is unclear whether this measure accurately identifies behavioral health symptoms in youth with DD/D. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the PSC-17 for children with DD/D. Medical record data from 3596 pediatric patients at a primary care clinic were analyzed. Descriptive analyses, measurement invariance testing, and internal consistency evaluations were conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the PSC-17. The results of these analyses support the use of the PSC-17 for behavioral health screening for children with DD/D. Behavioral health screening in this population is critical, because the timely identification of behavioral health concerns can facilitate early intervention, which may enhance long-term functioning.

Harnessing the Power of Integrated Behavioral Health to Enhance Insomnia Intervention in Primary Care.

Insomnia is prevalent in primary care and associated with co-morbid physical and mental health conditions and poor health outcomes. While there are effective treatments for insomnia in specialty mental health care, many patients have difficulty accessing these interventions. To begin, patients do not always report their sleep challenges to physicians; meanwhile, primary care providers often do not screen for insomnia symptoms. Furthermore, patients may experience several barriers to accessing specialty care for insomnia treatment, such as a limited number of available providers, financial burden, lack of transportation, and low perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Primary care behavioral health (PCBH) is well-equipped to address the challenges of accessing evidence-based care for insomnia through (1) identifying sleep issues, (2) providing psychoeducation on the possible treatments for insomnia, (3) intervening with poor sleep habits and acute insomnia early to prevent chronic insomnia, and (4) delivering appropriate evidence-based interventions for chronic insomnia. Primary care clinics should leverage behavioral health providers to increase screening and embed interventions into routine care for the benefit of improved outcomes for patients with insomnia and other sleep challenges.

"Integrated behavioral health plus": The best of the worlds of collaborative care management, primary care behavioral health, and primary care.

Discussions comparing the components and virtues of models of integrated behavioral health (IBH), that is, collaborative care management and primary care behavioral health, have been ongoing. In this conceptual article, we recommend shifting the focus to a broader set of components we have found essential to serve the needs of our patients, and hopefully the broader aims of dissemination and implementation of IBH. We detail our 20-year experience including the personnel, program components, challenges, successes, and plans for the future that will meet our patients' behavioral health needs and serve primary care. We compare our "IBH Plus" approach using the central tenets of primary care known as the "six Cs" (6Cs) to two dominant models, illustrating differences and similarities among them. The "6Cs" are first contact/accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, context-based, and accountability. We detail how each of these "6Cs" guides the structure and functioning of IBH Plus in the team-based patient-centered medical home setting. We believe IBH Plus more clearly relates to and supports the rest of the primary care transformation movement while integrating components of the most popular models of IBH and may support greater implementation of IBH. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Anxiety Management in Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria within Integrated Primary Care

We report a case of a patient seen within Integrated Primary Care at a collegiate health center for treatment of comorbid idiopathic urticaria and anxiety. Following medical consultation within Primary Care, Emergency services, and Asthma and Allergy Specialists, Primary Care Behavioral Health services were consulted. Here, we describe the Behavioral Health Consultant (BHC) model within primary care and the collaborative nature of the model. The benefits of this collaboration allowed the patient’s primary care provider (PCP) to use appointment times efficiently and to rely on the BHC to address the complexities of the patient’s underlying stress and anxiety. We detail the ways in which the BHC model contributed to significant decreases in the patient’s symptoms of anxiety and depression. Finally, we recommend expansion of programs providing opportunities for training in the integrated primary care model.

Patient perspectives on primary care behavioral health integration in an urban mental health professional shortage area: Benefits, facilitators, and barriers.

While studies have described the benefits of integrating behavioral health (BH) into primary care (PC), few have examined patients' perspectives, especially in large, urban health systems. In 2015, the University of Chicago Medicine launched the Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration Program, located in a mental health professional shortage area. In 2021, semistructured interviews were conducted with adult patients who had discussed their depression symptoms with their primary care clinician (PCC). Participants were asked about their experiences of being screened for depression, discussing BH, and being referred to behavioral health clinicians (BHCs). Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and constant comparison, and they were conducted until theme saturation was achieved. Fifteen participants were interviewed, the majority of whom were women and African American/Black, with an average age of 52. Participants expressed that PC-BH integration helps patients recognize BH problems and navigate the BH care system, emphasizes the connection between physical and mental health, and eases conversations through familiar setting and established trust. Patients enumerated barriers to integration, including barriers to BH care in the PC setting, barriers to BH conversations with PCCs/BHCs, and barriers to referrals to psychiatry/external therapy. Patients highlighted facilitators of integration, including trust with their PCC, collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, and population-level screening. These perspectives affirm the core strength of PC-BH integration: making BH more accessible and destigmatizing, especially for underserved communities. They also emphasize the importance of collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, shared identities, and actively involving patients in program design and quality improvement interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Implementing primary care behavioral health in Swedish primary care – study protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster trial

BackgroundMental health problems represent a large and growing public health concern. Primary care handles most of the patients with mental health problems, but there are many barriers to detection and treatment in this setting, causing under-recognition and under-treatment of patients. The service delivery model Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) shows promise to manage mental health problems in primary care, but more research is needed regarding its effects on multiple levels.MethodsThis project investigates the effectiveness and implementation of a large-scale implementation of PCBH in Region Östergötland, Sweden. The aim is to generate new knowledge concerning the impact of a real-world implementation and use of PCBH in routine primary care. A Pragmatic Stepped-Wedge Cluster Trial will be used: 24 PCBH primary care centres in one region will be compared with 48 standard care centres in three other regions. The model will be implemented sequentially at the PCBH centres according to a staggered timetable. Results will be investigated at patient, staff and organization levels and various forms of data will be collected: (1) local and national registry data; (2) questionnaire data; (3) interview data; and (4) document data.DiscussionThis project investigates the effectiveness and implementation of PCBH in routine primary care. The project could result in improved mental health care for the included patients and contribute to the general good for a wider population who have mental health problems. The project’s study design will make it possible to assess many important effects of the PCBH service delivery model at different levels, providing evidence of the effectiveness (or not) of the PCBH model under routine conditions in primary care. The project has the potential to generate clinically meaningful results that can provide a basis for decisions concerning further implementation and use of the model and thus for future development of mental health care provision in primary care.Trial registrationNCT05633940, date of registration: 2021–04-21.

Supplemental Material for Patient Perspectives on Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration in an Urban Mental Health Professional Shortage Area: Benefits, Facilitators, and Barriers

Supplemental Material for Patient Perspectives on Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration in an Urban Mental Health Professional Shortage Area: Benefits, Facilitators, and Barriers

How do models of integrated primary care work? A proposed model for mechanisms of change using primary care behavioral health.

Embedding a behavioral health consultant (BHC) into primary care settings is a common way to address the challenge of providing mental health services to primary care patients. Systematic research on the mechanisms of change that underlie the relationship between the active components of these integrated models of care delivery on patient outcomes is needed to help maximize effectiveness and, in turn, guide future implementation efforts. Using the existing primary care behavioral health (PCBH) literature, this article provides a conceptual framework using a common presenting problem, depression and identifies the active ingredients of PCBH and hypothesized mechanisms of patient change that result in decreased depressive symptoms and improved functioning within a patient. Eight hypothesized mechanisms (i.e., belief that PCBH services provided by BHC is a standard part of care within primary care; increased credibility of BHC and PCBH care provided; increased receptivity to the PCBH services offered; increased understanding of problem and options; realignment of patient expectations for care; increased readiness to change; decrease stigma; increase capacity to cope and manage symptoms) are proposed within this conceptual framework along with four potential mediators/moderators (i.e., team processes, PCBH factors, common factors, treatment engagement). The theoretical conceptualization included calls for future research to provide an evidence base to inform clinical practice. An increased understanding of the relationship between these active ingredients and the identified mechanisms of change is essential to maximize PCBH's effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Barriers and Facilitators to Interdisciplinary Mental and Behavioral Health in Primary Care

Abstract Date Presented 03/22/24 A systematic rapid review process was used to examine existing literature on best practices for interdisciplinary mental and behavioral health services in primary care for a Hispanic population. Existing facilitators and barriers will be described. Primary Author and Speaker: Kimberley Persons

When Interruption Becomes Innovation: How Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care Adapted During COVID-19.

Integrated behavioral health (IBH) delivered in primary care is critical to addressing the growing behavioral health crisis in the United States. COVID-19 prompted changes to the core components of IBH, causing the model to shift. The specifics of how IBH teams adapted and what these adaptations mean for the future of IBH teams in primary care are uncertain. We conducted individual interviews with IBH team members using a semistructured interview guide. A purposive convenience sample consisted of primary care clinicians (N=20) from nine states. We used qualitative thematic analysis to code and generate themes. Four themes emerged: (a) permanent changes to the physical structure of the team; (b) increased reliance on technology for team communication; (c) shift in team collaboration, often occurring asynchronously; and (d) telehealth embraced for IBH. COVID-19 interrupted the originally designed IBH model of team-based care. Changes to the physical proximity of team members disrupted all other components of IBH, requiring adapted workflows, communication via digital channels, virtual team building, asynchronous care coordination, and remote service delivery. Long-term evaluation of these innovations is needed to examine whether shifts in core components impact model efficacy. Training family medicine, primary care, and behavioral health clinicians for these adapted models of IBH will be needed.

Brief behavioral intervention for chronic pain in integrated primary care: What are we waiting for?

Despite high rates of pain-related concerns among primary care patients and associated increases in health care costs (Gore et al., 2012; Mills et al., 2016), psychological or behavioral treatments that are well suited for use in integrated primary care (IPC) settings remain sparsely implemented. Psychological treatment for chronic pain has been recommended for many years (Darnall, 2021; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care and Education, 2011; Kligler et al., 2018), and the emphasis on the application of nonpharmacological treatment has intensified following concerns about opioid safety. There is abundant empirical support for the use of psychological treatment for chronic pain, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in specialty settings (Williams et al., 2021). The evidence to support the use of "brief treatments" in IPC is in a comparatively early stage. The limited state of the research might suggest that brief behavioral intervention for chronic pain is years away from being ready for translation to everyday clinical practice. But why wait? We therefore conducted a focused narrative review of peer-reviewed research on brief psychotherapy for chronic pain in adults that could be feasibly employed in IPC settings through more widely adopted models, such as primary care behavioral health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Brief modular anxiety intervention for primary care: Hybrid I pilot randomized controlled trial of feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and implementation potential

BackgroundAnxiety is highly prevalent, but undertreated, in primary care. Brief, non-pharmacological interventions are needed. Modular Anxiety Skills Training (MAST), a cognitive-behavioral anxiety intervention, was developed for primary care and tailored for a Veteran sample (MAST-V). The purpose of this mixed methods pilot study was to evaluate MAST-V's feasibility, acceptability, and implementation potential, and preliminarily examine its effectiveness compared to Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) usual care. MethodsThis hybrid I randomized controlled trial (conducted 2019–2021) assigned 35 primary care patients (Mage = 47, 17 % female, 27 % racial/ethnic minority) with clinically significant anxiety symptoms to receive MAST-V or PCBH usual care. Participants completed validated measures of anxiety symptoms and functional impairment at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. ResultsParticipants attended more sessions in MAST-V than usual care. After necessary adjustments to reduce session duration, MAST-V will likely fit within PCBH practice parameters. Participants in both conditions valued treatment, but treatment satisfaction, credibility, and therapeutic alliance were higher for MAST-V. Study therapists achieved high treatment fidelity and rated MAST-V as highly feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for PCBH. They identified ways to address potential barriers to implementation. MAST-V was more effective than usual care in reducing anxiety symptoms and impairment. LimitationsThis was a small pilot study at a single site using study therapists. Results should be considered preliminary until replicated in a full-scale clinical trial. ConclusionsThis brief modular anxiety intervention, which was designed with implementation in mind, may help to address the anxiety treatment gap in primary care.

Non-communicable diseases and the prospects of integrated behavioral health in India: current status and future directions

PurposeContextual to the recognition of the complex interplay between health and behavioral aspects, integrated behavioral health (IBH) has emerged. Although this model is becoming popular in the Western world, its presence in the global context is not promising. This paper aims to explore the need for IBH in India and address its barriers to implementation and possible solutions.Design/methodology/approachWe analyzed the case of IBH and its potential implications for India using the current evidence base, authors' reflections and experience of implementing similar programs.FindingsThis paper identifies contextual factors, including increased instances of non-communicable diseases and psychosocial and cultural determinants of health, that necessitate the implementation of IBH programs in India. The key features of different IBH models and their applicability are outlined. The current status of IBH and potential challenges in implementation in India in terms of human resources and other factors are delineated. We also discuss the potential models for implementing IBH in India.Originality/valueIntegrating behavioral health in primary care is considered an effective and sustainable model to promote health and well-being across various target populations. Towards this end, this paper is the first to discuss the contextual factors of IBH in India. It is a significant addition to the knowledge base on IBH and its possible implementation barriers and strategies in low- and middle-income countries.

Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care

Osteopathic family physicians embody the philosophy of whole-person care, including using a biopsychosocial approach to incorporate mental health into patient care. The creation of the Behavioral Health Integration Collaborative increased support for a system-level adoption of whole-person care in primary care settings. With the increase in both mental health symptoms and diagnoses among Americans, and the increasing support for integrated physical and behavioral healthcare in the primary care setting, this paper shares various approaches, as well as challenges to, adapting integrated care in the primary care office. This includes reviewing best practices for implementing this care approach. The two leading models for integrated care are the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model and Collaborative Care model (CoCM). Both models include clinically embedding licensed mental health professionals into the primary care setting, thus increasing access to colleagues with this specialized approach. The PCBH model utilizes a warm hand-off approach, resulting in a collaboration between physician and mental health provider in the care of the patient. The CoCM focuses on a registry of patients who are overseen by a behavioral health manager with treatment decisions guided by a consulting psychiatrist. Blended models are also emerging to better suit the needs for different practices and the patient populations they serve. Challenges to full implementation include acquiring buy-in from practice leadership, hiring appropriately trained mental health providers, and defining billing and coding procedures.

Embedding Counselors in Student Health Centers: Exploring Challenges to Implementing the Primary Care Behavioral Health Model

ABSTRACT Embedding counselors in various campus locations has been one strategy to address the student mental health crisis. The aim of this study was to evaluate challenges to implementing the primary care behavioral health (PCBH) model, in which behavioral health counselors (BHCs) are embedded within the college health center, and to explore characteristics associated with differing levels of PCBH fidelity. Seventy-one BHCs working in college health centers completed the online fidelity survey. Most respondent scores denoted moderate or strong fidelity to the PCBH model. Psychologists showed better adherence to autonomous clinical aspects of PCBH while social workers/counselors showed better adherence to collaborative aspects of PCBH. Overall findings suggest fidelity to PCBH by BHCs in college health is driven by independent clinical activity more than interdisciplinary collaboration. Strategies for developing and evaluating a PCBH program that complements the specialty mental health services offered through counseling centers are discussed.

Can the electronic medical record provide reliable indicators of primary care behavioral health fidelity? Comparison of accessibility and productivity indicators assessed through observational coding.

The primary care behavioral health (PCBH) model is one of the most widely implemented integrated care approaches. However, research on the model has been limited by inconsistent measurement and reporting of model fidelity. One way of making measurement of PCBH model fidelity more routine is to incorporate fidelity indicators into the electronic medical record (EMR), though research regarding the accuracy of EMR data is mixed. In this study, we aimed to assess the reliability of EMR data as a PCBH fidelity measurement tool by comparing key EMR indicators of PCBH fidelity to those recorded by an observational coder. Over an 8-month period (October 2021-May 2022), 12 behavioral health consultants (BHCs; 92% White, 75% female) across five primary care clinics recorded indicators of PCBH fidelity in the EMR as part of their routine charting of behavioral health visits. During that same period, one observational coder completed seven 4-hr visits per clinic to obtain multiple samples of data from each over time and recorded the same variables (i.e., percentage of visits prompted by warm handoffs, number of warm handoffs, and number of patient visits). We used bivariate correlations to test the associations between the EMR variables and the observer-coded variables. Correlations between EMR and observer-coded variables were moderate to strong, ranging from r = .46 to r = .97. Leveraging EMR data appears to be a fairly reliable approach to capturing indicators of PCBH model fidelity in the key domains of accessibility and high productivity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Supplemental Material for Can the Electronic Medical Record Provide Reliable Indicators of Primary Care Behavioral Health Fidelity? Comparison of Accessibility and Productivity Indicators Assessed Through Observational Coding

Supplemental Material for Can the Electronic Medical Record Provide Reliable Indicators of Primary Care Behavioral Health Fidelity? Comparison of Accessibility and Productivity Indicators Assessed Through Observational Coding

Brief conjoint visits between an embedded behavioral health provider and primary care team member: When are they used and what are the barriers and facilitators?

Conjoint visits utilize the expertise of primary care providers (PCPs) and behavioral health providers (BHPs) to address complex comorbidities in patients. The objectives were to describe the use and features of conjoint visits and identify barriers and facilitators as described by BHPs in integrated settings. Three hundred and forty-five BHPs who worked in integrated primary care, a majority identifying as female and white, completed an online survey between October 2018 and July 2019. Results indicated common reasons for conjoint visits were for mental or behavioral health concerns. Though they reported high comfort using conjoint visits (M = 4.3/5), 56.5% of BHPs participated in them less than monthly or never. Using a constant comparison approach, qualitative data were coded to reveal six categories of barriers and five categories of facilitators to conjoint visits. The most common barriers were a result of a lack of systemic support, such as 73.5% reporting lack of time, while the most common facilitators were coordination (60.7%) and interprofessional communication (39.3%). Although conjoint visits are used infrequently, findings suggest it is not because they are unhelpful as providers generally found this type of appointment favorable. Rather, they and their teams lack time, training, and support needed for implementation. This research provides an introduction for researchers or clinicians to better understand the use of conjoint visits for patients with high needs and complexities. Future work focused on addressing barriers cited by providers regarding conjoint visits would increase providers' ability to use this form of care when it is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).