Primary Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Research Articles

Worse Preoperative Pain and Higher Activity Levels Predict Patient Choice of Formal Physical Therapy After Primary Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this randomized controlled trial is (1) to compare the efficacy of supervised formal physical therapy (PT) and self-directed home exercises and (2) to identify independent predictors of transitioning from self-directed home exercises to supervised formal PT following total hip arthroplasty (THA) via an anterior approach. MethodsAfter Institutional Review Board approval, 147 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA through anterior approach were enrolled and randomized to receive either clinic or home-based PT. Surveys with Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) and Short Form-12 Health Survey scores for both groups were obtained before surgery and at 6, 14, and 24 weeks after surgery. Patients had the option to transition into the other study group at their 6-week follow-up visit. ResultsOf the 147 patients enrolled, final analysis included scores for 136 patients. Forty-two (63.6%) of the 66 patients randomized to the supervised formal PT group crossed over to self-directed home exercise group and 12 (17.1%) of the 70 patients randomized to the self-directed home exercise group crossed over to supervised formal PT group. There were no significant (P > .05) differences between groups at all time points for the overall HOOS and Short Form-12 Health Survey. Subjects with worse preoperative pain scores (P = .005) and higher HOOS preoperative activity of daily living scores (P = .015) were more likely to transition from the home exercise group to formal PT group. ConclusionThere were no significant outcome score differences between subjects undergoing supervised formal PT and self-directed home exercises. However, patients reporting worse preoperative pain and higher preoperative activity levels may prefer supervised formal PT compared to self-directed home exercises after undergoing primary anterior THA.

Negative Pressure Incisional Therapy and Infection After Direct Anterior Approach Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

With the aging of the US population, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming an increasingly common procedure. A major concern after THA is reducing infection rates, as infections can cause devastating complications. Improved sterile technique, standardized infection control protocols, and novel dressings have been used to reduce postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs). The use of either silver-impregnated dry dressings or easily applied incisional negative pressure dressings is aimed at reducing the rates of SSIs after primary anterior THA. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 275 patients who underwent anterior THA at their institution during a 1-year period. Patients were separated into groups based on their surgical dressing. Rates of SSI were documented, and the effects of various factors, including age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities, were compared between the 2 cohorts. The authors also analyzed high-risk patients to determine whether easily applied incisional negative pressure dressings reduced infections. The use of easily applied incisional negative pressure dressings after primary anterior THA did not have a statistically significant impact on SSI rate (P=.42). There was also no difference in SSI, readmission, or reoperation in the high-risk group. The goal of using an incisional negative pressure wound therapy device is to help further decrease the risk of SSI. This study's findings suggest that the SSI rate in this group did not differ from that in the standard dressing group, such that the prophylactic use of a negative pressure wound therapy device is not indicated for either standard or high-risk patients undergoing primary anterior approach THA. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):e539-e544.].