Abstract Background The expansion in indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has fuelled an increase in demand worldwide. Prolonged waiting lists and waiting list mortalities are not infrequent and often arise from limited hospital capacity and infrastructure. Approaches to address this have included procedural modifications – ‘minimalist TAVI’ and more recently the development of pathways to facilitate early discharge post-TAVI, such as same-day discharge (SDD) post-procedure. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel SDD pathway a large volume tertiary referral cardiac centre. Methods A new SDD pathway was established between March 2023 and February 2024 at a large-volume tertiary cardiac centre in UK. All patients accepted for TAVI were screened for SDD suitability based on three factors: 1) availability of adequate social support, (defined as presence of able-bodies adult individual to assist in home recovery), 2) technically suitable for transfemoral approach and 3) presence of previous pacemaker or low risk for conduction abnormalities (defined as no baseline conduction disturbances). Following TAVI, patients were deemed suitable for SDD if they were clinically stable, the procedure was technically successful and there were no procedural complications. Demographic, clinical, procedural and outcome data were collected for all patients enrolled onto the SDD pathway and reasons for non-SDD were identified. Ethical approval was obtained in accordance with local institutional policies. Results From March 2023 to February 2024, 81 out of 305 patients (26.6%) were enrolled onto the SDD pathway (median age 82 years old, 66.7% male, median STS risk score 2.34%). Indications for TAVI were severe native aortic stenosis (74/81, 91.4%), severe native aortic regurgitation (2/81, 2.5%) and severe surgical valve degeneration (5/81, 6.2%). SDD was feasible for 58/81 (71.6%) of patients, with 10/81 (12.3%) discharged the following day and 13/81 (16.0%%) requiring >24 hours hospital admission (Figure 1). Reasons for non-SDD included new conduction abnormality (10/81, 12.3%), vascular complication (6/81, 7.4%), acute stroke (3/81, 3.7%), patient preference (2/81, 2.5%) and haemodynamic instability (2/81, 2.5%). Out of the 58 SDD patients, 25/58 (43.1%) had no previous permanent pacemaker system and in these patients a balloon-expandable valve was selected for 24/25 (96.0%) of patients (Figure 2). Conclusions Patient selection based on the presence of social support at home, low risk of conduction abnormalities or previous pacemaker combined with appropriate valve selection can facilitate a safe and effective SDD post-TAVI programme.