Previous History Of Periodontitis Research Articles

Causes of Implant Failure and Subsequent Removal: A Retrospective Study in a Hospital setting.

Despite high rates of success for dental implants, implant failure due to several causes may require explantation. In the present retrospective study, implants removed between 2000 and 2022 have been registered and the cause of removal has been established. All implants were removed by a single operator (PPM) in the department of Oral Surgery of the George Eastman Dental Hospital in Rome, Italy. Characteristics of removed implants such as implant surface, morphology (bone versus tissue level implants), type of restoration (fixed versus removable), in the case of fixed restorations, mode of retention (cement versus screw-retained), location of the implant (maxillary versus mandibular arch) were recorded. Furthermore, patient-level characteristics were also recorded (systemic health conditions and medications taken, smoking habits and previous history of periodontitis). In total, 381 implants in 381 patients were removed in the 20-year time-span. The most frequent cause of removal was peri-implantitis (82.4% of implants), followed by implant malposition and loss of osteointegration. The survival time was not affected by the cause of removal, while bone level implants had a longer survival time versus tissue level implants. Maxillary implants had a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis compared to mandibular implants.

Immediate Loading of Implants with Fixed Rehabilitations in Geriatric Edentulous Patients; Biological Complications.

This study aimed to report the outcomes of the immediate loading of implants with fixed rehabilitations in edentulous geriatric patients. Edentulous geriatric patients were diagnosed with an oral examination, radiographic evaluation, and intermaxillary relations and treated with fixed rehabilitation over several implants. After immediate surgery, the implants were immediately loaded with a fully fixed prosthesis. Twenty-four patients (20 females and 4 males) were treated using a total 210 implants. All patients (100%) had a previous history of periodontitis. Eleven patients (45.8%) were smokers. Eleven patients (45.8%) suffered from chronic medical diseases (i.e., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases). The study's clinical follow-up period extended for three years, during which thirty-three fixed prostheses were installed over the implants in 24 patients. The average marginal bone loss measured was 1.33 ± 0.17 mm. The success rate of the implants and prosthodontics being placed in this study yielded 98.5% and 97%, respectively. One patient (4.2%) showed some kind of technical complications. Eleven patients (45.8%) showed mucositis, and 25 implants (11.9%) in 10 patients (41.7%) were associated with peri-implantitis. This study shows that the treatment of edentulous geriatric patients by immediate loading of implants with fixed rehabilitations is a clinically successful protocol but with a high prevalence of peri-implant diseases.

Early Loading of Two Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures in Geriatric Edentulous Patients: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study.

Background: This study aims to show the clinical outcomes of implants supporting mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients. Methods: Mandibular edentulous patients were diagnosed with an oral examination, panoramic radiograph, and diagnostic casts for intermaxillary relations and treated with overdentures over two implants. After two-stage surgery, implants were early loaded with an overdenture at 6 weeks. Results: Fifty-four patients (28 females and 24 males) were treated with 108 implants. Thirty-two patients (59.2%) had a previous history of periodontitis. Twenty-three patients (46%) were smokers. Forty patients (74.1%) suffered from systemic diseases (i.e., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases). The clinical follow-up of the study was 147.8 ± 10.4 months. The clinical outcomes showed a global success of 94.5% of implants. Fifty-four overdentures were placed in the patients over the implants. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.12 ± 0.34 mm. Nineteen patients (35.2%) showed some kind of mechanical prosthodontic complication. Sixteen implants (14.8%) were associated with peri-implantitis. Conclusions: Based on the clinical results obtained, we can determine that the treatment of elderly edentulous patients with mandibular overdentures through the early loading of two placed implants is a successful implant protocol.

Immediate Functional Loading with Full-Arch Fixed Implant-Retained Rehabilitation in Periodontal Patients: Clinical Study.

(1) Background. The immediate functional loading of implants is a clinical procedure used for treating periodontal edentulous patients. This clinical study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the immediate functional loading of implants with fully fixed rehabilitations in compromised periodontal patients. (2) Methods. Three hundred and five implants IPX screw implants were placed in 27 periodontal patients using an immediate functional loading protocol with fixed rehabilitations. All patients had a previous history of periodontitis, four patients (14.8%) were smokers and seven patients (25.9%) suffered from chronic medical conditions. (3) Results. Implant and prosthetic clinical findings were evaluated during a mean period of 41.3 ± 19.6 months. No implants were lost during the clinical follow-up. The cumulative survival rate for all implants was 100%. Regarding the prostheses designed, a total of 54 fixed prostheses were placed in the 27 patients immediately after the surgery. Forty-four hybrid fixed prostheses (81.5%) and 10 fixed rehabilitations (18.5%) were placed in the patients. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.51 ± 1.16 mm, ranging from 0 to 3.5 mm during the follow-up evaluation. Thirty-one implants (10.2%) in 10 patients (37%) were associated with peri-implantitis. Five patients (18.5%) showed some kind of technical complications (loss/fracture of the prosthetic screw, acrylic resin fracture, ceramic chipping). (4) Conclusions. The clinical outcomes of this study demonstrate that fixed rehabilitation by immediate functional loading of implants is considered a predictable procedure.

Implant Treatment by Guided Surgery Supporting Overdentures in Edentulous Mandible Patients.

Introduction: This study aimed to show the clinical outcomes of implants inserted by guided surgery supporting mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients. Patients and methods: Mandibular edentulous patients were diagnosed with an oral examination, cone-beam computerized tomography, and diagnostic casts for intermaxillary relations and treated with overdentures over two implants by guided surgery. After flapless surgery, implants were early loaded with an overdenture at 6 weeks. Results and discussion: Fourteen patients (nine females and five males) were treated with 28 implants. Four patients (28.6%) had a previous history of periodontitis. Five patients (35.7%) were smokers. Nine patients (64.3%) suffered from systemic diseases (i.e., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases). The clinical follow-up of the study was 44.7 ± 31.4 months. Clinical outcomes showed a global success of 100% of implants. Fourteen overdentures were placed in the patients over the implants. Mean marginal bone loss was 1.25 mm ± 0.95 mm. Four patients (28.6%) showed some kind of mechanical prosthodontic complications. Six implants (21.4%) were associated with peri-implantitis. Conclusions: This study indicates that treatment of mandibular edentulous patients with overdentures by guided surgery and early loading of implants placed appears to be a successful implant protocol.

Immediate Loading of Implants Placed by Guided Surgery in Geriatric Edentulous Mandible Patients.

The aim of this study was to show the clinical outcomes of the immediate loading of implants inserted by guided surgery in edentulous mandible patients. Edentulous mandible patients were diagnosed with oral examination, cone beam computerized tomography and diagnostic casts for intermaxillary relations and treated with 8–10 implants for rehabilitation with guided surgery and immediate loading. After flapless surgery, implants were loaded with an immediate acrylic temporary prosthesis. After a period of six months, a ceramic definitive full-arch prosthesis was placed. A total of 22 patients (12 females and 10 males) were treated with 198 implants. Eleven patients (50%) had a previous history of periodontitis. Six patients (27.3%) were smokers. The follow-up was 84.2 ± 4.9 months. Clinical outcomes showed a global success rate of 97.5% of implants. Five implants were lost during the healing phase with provisional prosthesis. Twenty-two fixed full-arch rehabilitations were placed in the patients over the 193 remaining implants. Mean marginal bone loss was 1.44 mm ± 0.45 mm. Six patients (27.3%) showed some kind of mechanical prosthodontic complication. Eighteen (9.3%) of the 193 remaining implants were associated with peri-implantitis. The antecedents of peri-implantitis are critical elements for the survival of the implants. The loss of implants was significant in patients who smoked up to 10 cigarettes, compared to non-smokers. Peri-implantitis is one of the key elements in the long-term follow-up of implants and it was more manifest in smoking patients, and in those with a history of peri-implantitis. Marginal bone loss was more significant in smokers. Full-arch rehabilitation is presented as a predictable alternative with minor fatigue problems that are easily solvable.

The correlation between history of periodontitis according to staging and grading and the prevalence/severity of peri-implantitis in patients enrolled in maintenance therapy.

The aim of this study was to determine if a previous history of periodontitis according to the preset definitions of the 2017 World Workshop is correlated with increased implant failure, and occurrence and severity of peri-implantitis (PI). A retrospective analysis of patients with a history of periodontitis who received nonsurgical and, if indicated, surgical corrective therapy prior to implant placement was performed. Periodontitis stage and grade were determined for each included patient based on data from the time of initiation of active periodontal therapy. Cox Proportional Hazard Frailty models were built to analyze the correlation between stage and grade of periodontitis at baseline with implant failure, as well as occurrence and severity of PI. Ninety-nine patients with a history of periodontitis receiving 221 implants were followed for a mean duration of 10.6 ± 4.5 years after implant placement. Six implants (2.7%) failed and a higher rate of implant failure due to PI was found for Grade C patients (P < 0.05), whereas only an increased trend was seen for Stages III and IV compared with I and II. Grading significantly influenced the risk of marginal bone loss (MBL) >25% of the implant length (P = 0.022) in PI-affected implants. However, a direct correlation between higher-level stage and grade and PI prevalence was not recorded. No statistically significant association between periodontitis stage or grade and the prevalence of PI was found. However, when PI was diagnosed, there was a relationship between periodontitis grade and severity of PI or the occurrence of implant failure.

Implant health and factors affecting peri-implant marginal bone alteration for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus augmentation: A 5-year prospective study.

Evaluating the extent of and the factors affecting marginal bone level (MBL) alterations and consecutively implant success and implant health for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus floor (SF) augmentation. A 5-year prospective, cohort study was conducted on 85 patients with 124 maxillary sinus augmentation procedure and 295 implants placed. Peri-implant MBL alterations (reductions) were evaluated radiographically at the first year, third year, and fifth year postloading follow-ups and were considered to patient-related risk factors (age, gender, diabetes mellitus, smoking, rheumatic disorders, and history of periodontal disease [PD]), to clinican/surgically related risk factors (membrane perforations, sinus site, and residual ridge height), to implant/prosthesis-related features (implant length, diameter, location, keratinized gingiva, and restoration gap), and to the plaque score. Additionally, implant and prostheses survival/success rate and peri-implant health (mucositis/peri-implantitis) were assessed. About 267/295 implants (drop-out:n9 pat; 28 implants: 9%) were followed for 5 years (survival/success: 99.3%/96.5%), presenting significant (P < .001) differences of MBL alterations (-1.45 ± 0.38 mm) over time. The univariate analysis demonstrated differences of MBL alterations for smokers versus nonsmokers (P = .005), for patients with versus without history of PD (P = .001), and presence versus absence of plaque (P = .041). In the 5-year multivariate analysis, MBL alteration was influenced by time (P = .001) and was related to risk factors as smoking (P = .001; odds ratio [OR] = 6.563) and history of PD (P = .015; OR = 4.450). Significant ORs for MBL alterations were also found for a restoration gap used for a full-arch dentures (P = .001; OR = 8.275) associated with reduced (≤3 mm) residual ridge height (P = .015; OR = 1.365). The overall 5 year incidence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was 25.3% and 3.7% at implant level and 30.3% and 6.6% at patient level, respectively. Apart from the high success rate and healthy status of implant placed in staged SF seen, MBL alteration increased over time and was negatively affected predominately by patient-specific risk factors such as smoking status and previous history of periodontitis.

Management of peri-implantitis: Remedy for the malady

Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are diseases that affect the tissues surrounding a functional implant. Poor oral hygiene, smoking and previous history of periodontitis are known risk factors for the disease. The probing depth, the presence of bleeding on probing, suppuration and radiographs should be assessed regularly for the diagnosis else it can lead to implant loss and impaired function. In addition, the extent of the disease and pattern of bone loss are poorly described. There is limited information regarding the management of peri-implantitis. Various treatment modalities have been tried and tested, but there is yet to be a predictable outcome for peri-implantitis.

The 1st Baltic Osseointegration Academy and Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Consensus Conference 2016. Summary and Consensus Statements: Group I - Peri-Implantitis Aetiology, Risk Factors and Pathogenesis.

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe task of Group 1 was to review and update the existing data concerning aetiology, risk factors and pathogenesis of peri-implantitis. Previous history of periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, smoking and presence of general diseases have been considered among the aetiological risk factors for the onset of peri-implant pathologies, while late dental implant failures are commonly associated with peri-implantitis and/or with the application of incorrect biomechanical forces. Special interest was paid to the bone cells dynamics as part of the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis.Material and MethodsThe main areas indagated by this group were as follows: influence of smoking, history of periodontitis and general diseases on peri-implantitis development, bio-mechanics of implant loading and its influence on peri-implant bone and cellular dynamics related to the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis. The systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were registered in PROSPERO, an international prospective register of systematic reviews: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/. The literature in the corresponding areas of interest was screened and reported following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) Statement: http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Method of preparation of the systematic reviews, based on comprehensive search strategies, was discussed and standardized. The summary of the materials and methods employed by the authors in preparing the systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses is presented in Preface chapter.ResultsThe results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the respective papers. One systematic review with meta-analysis, three systematic reviews and one theoretical analysis were performed. The group′s general commentaries, consensus statements, clinical recommendations and implications for research are presented in this article.

Relationship Between Osteoporosis and Marginal Bone Loss in Osseointegrated Implants: A 2-Year Retrospective Study.

Fitting implants in osteoporotic patients has traditionally been controversial, and there is little scientific evidence relating osteoporosis to marginal bone loss (MBL). The aims of this study are as follows: 1) to evaluate the possibility of a correlation between osteoporosis, as measured by the mandibular cortical index (MCI), and MBL and 2) to assess how various systemic diseases, periodontitis, and placement of implants in regenerated bone are correlated with MBL and MCI. This retrospective study examines 212 implants inserted in 67 patients. To take a possible cluster failure into account, an implant for each patient was selected (n = 67 implants). MBL was assessed. Osteoporosis was evaluated using the MCI. Both MBL and MCI were assessed from panoramic radiographs. χ(2) test was performed (Haberman post hoc test). Significance was P <0.05. When the total sample implant (N = 212) was evaluated, a significant association was found between the presence of osteoporosis and MCI (P <0.001) and between the presence of diabetes mellitus and MCI (P <0.01). Significant associations were also found between MBL and placement of implants in regenerated sites (P <0.001) and between MBL and a previous history of periodontitis (P <0.05). When the sample is evaluated only in selected implants (one per patient, n = 67), significant differences appear to relate only to the MBL with the placement of implants in regenerated bone sites (P <0.001). Osteoporosis (as evaluated by MCI) does not pose a risk for the development of greater MBL. Parameters adversely affecting the development of increased MBL are a previous history of periodontitis and especially the placement of implants at sites of bone regeneration.

Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri-implant marginal bone loss.

The purpose was to radiographically analyze and compare the marginal bone loss (MBL) between implants with different mismatching distance and to study the influence of the prosthetic abutment height on the MBL in association with the related mismatching distances. This retrospective study included 108 patients in whom 228 implants were placed, 180 with diameter of 4.5mm and 48 with diameter of 5mm. All patients received OsseoSpeed™ implants with internal tapered conical connection (Denstply Implants). Different mismatching distances were obtained, given that all implants were loaded with the same uni-abutment type (Lilac; Denstply Implants). Data were gathered on age, gender, bone substratum, smoking habits, previous history of periodontitis, and prosthetic features. MBL was analyzed radiographically at 6 and 18months post-loading. Mixed linear analysis of mesial and distal MBL values yielded significant effects of abutment, implant diameter, follow-up period, bone substratum, smoking, and abutment×time interaction. MBL was greater at 18 vs. 6months, for short vs. long abutments, for grafted vs. pristine bone, for a heavier smoking habit, and for implants with a diameter of 5.0 vs. 4.5mm. Greater mismatching does not minimize the MBL; abutment height, smoking habit, and bone substratum may play a role in the MBL over the short- and medium term.

Clinical significance of interleukin-1 genotype in smoking patients as a predictor of peri-implantitis: A case-control study.

BackgroundInterleukin-1 (IL-1) is a proinflammatory cytokine that plays an important role in the pathogenesis of periodontitis, and so it might be useful to detect high-risk cases of peri-implantitis. It has been reported that IL-1 polymorphisms and smoking habit have a synergic effect, increasing the incidence of peri-implantitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between IL-1 gene polymorphisms and peri-implantitis in smoking patients.Material and MethodsA case-control study was performed in 27 patients with peri-implantitis and 27 patients with healthy implants. All patients included were smokers. IL-1A-C889T, IL-1B+C3953T and IL-1RN+T2018C were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification in order to establish a relation between these variables and the presence of peri-implantitis. A bivariate analysis was performed and odds-ratio (OR) were calculated.ResultsThe incidence of peri-implantitis was significantly higher in patients with previous history of periodontitis (p=0.024; OR=10.9). Both groups were similar regarding IL-1A-C889T, IL-1B+C3953T and IL-1RN+T2018C genotypes. No increased risk in heavy smokers with IL-1 polymorphism was found.ConclusionsIL-1 genotypes do not seem to be good predictors of peri-implantitis in the great majority of smoking patients. Furthermore, no synergic effect was found between IL-1 genotypes and heavy smokers. Patients with a previous history of periodontitis were more prone to peri-implantitis. Key words:Peri-implantitis, interleukin-1 genotype positive, case-control study, smoking.

Crestal Bone Changes at Teeth and Implants in Periodontally Healthy and Periodontally Compromised Patients. A 10‐Year Comparative Case‐Series Study

Limited data exist on the longitudinal crestal bone changes around teeth compared with implants in partially edentulous patients. This study sought to compare the 10-year radiographic crestal bone changes (bone level [BL]) around teeth and implants in periodontally compromised (PCPs) and periodontally healthy (PHPs) patients. A total of 120 patients were evaluated for the radiographic crestal BL around dental implants and adjacent teeth at time of implant crown insertion and at the 10-year follow-up. Sixty patients had a previous history of periodontitis (PCPs), and the remaining 60 were PHPs. In each category (PCP and PHP), two different implant systems were used. The mean BL change at the implant and at the adjacent tooth at the interproximal area was calculated by subtracting the radiographic crestal BL at the time of crown cementation from the radiographic crestal BL at the 10-year follow-up. At 10 years after therapy, the survival rate ranged from 80% to 95% for subgroups for implants, whereas it was 100% for the adjacent teeth. In all eight different patient categories evaluated, teeth demonstrated a significantly more stable radiographic BL compared with adjacent dental implants (teeth BL, 0.44 ± 0.23 mm; implant BL, 2.28 ± 0.72 mm; P <0.05). Radiographic BL changes around teeth seemed not to be influenced by the presence or absence of advanced bone loss (≥3 mm) at the adjacent implants. Natural teeth yielded better long-term results with respect to survival rate and marginal BL changes compared with dental implants. Moreover, these findings also extend to teeth with an initial reduced periodontal attachment level, provided adequate periodontal treatment and maintenance are performed. As a consequence, the decision of tooth extraction attributable to periodontal reasons in favor of a dental implant should be carefully considered in partially edentulous patients.

In vivoinflammation mapping of periodontal disease based on diffuse reflectance spectral imaging: a clinical study

Since conventional techniques using periodontal probes have inherent drawbacks in the diagnosis of different grades of gingival inflammation, development of noninvasive screening devices becomes significant. Diffuse reflectance (DR) spectra recorded with white light illumination is utilized to detect periodontal inflammation from the oxygenated hemoglobin absorption ratio R620/R575. A multispectral imaging system is utilized to record narrow-band DR images at 575 and 620 nm from the anterior sextant of the gingivia of 15 healthy volunteers and 25 patients (N=40). An experienced periodontist assesses the level of gingival inflammation at each site through periodontal probing and assigns diagnosis as healthy, mild, moderate, or severe inflammation. The DR image ratio R620/R575 computed for each pixel (8-µm resolution) from the monochrome images is pseudo-color-mapped to identify gingival inflammation sites. The DR image ratio values at each site are compared with clinical diagnosis to estimate the specificity and sensitivity of the DR imaging technique in inflammation mapping. The high diagnostic accuracy is utilized to detect underlying inflammation in six patients with a previous history of periodontitis.

The incidence of peri‐implantitis for two different implant systems over a period of thirteen years

To study the incidence of peri-implantitis over 13years between two types of dental implants. Peri-implantitis incidence was defined as bone loss ≥1.0mm after 1year, and with BOP or suppuration. Nineteen subjects with TioBlast AstraTech(™) (AT) and 22 subjects with machine-etched Brånemark Nobel Biocare(®) (NB) implants were studied. The incidences of peri-implantitis between years 1 and 7 and between years 7 and 13 were 26.2% and 7.1% for AT implants, and 30.4% and 11.5% for NB implants (NS). A history of periodontitis was a risk for future incidence of peri-implantitis (Likelihood ratio: 4.1, 95% CI: 2.0, 8.4, p<0.001). Subjects with a history of systemic disease had a higher incidence of peri-implantitis (p<0.05). No difference in the incidence of peri-implantitis over a period of 13years as an effect implant surface and design was found. Bone loss during the first 7years after implant installation was greater than thereafter. Microbiological information at year 7 did not predict incidence of peri-implantitis at year 13. Subjects with a previous history of periodontitis and with systemic disease were at higher risk for future incidence of peri-implantitis.

Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri-implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis

Does the data support the conclusion that 'the maintenance of periodontal health, rather than the previous history of periodontitis, is the critical determinant of increased risk of peri-implant disease'?

Prospective 10‐Year Cohort Study Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) on Implant‐Supported Full‐Arch Maxillary Prostheses. Part 1: Sandblasted and Acid‐Etched Implants and Mucosal Tissue

There have been very few long-term controlled studies (i.e., over 5 years duration) focusing on marginal conditions for implants with a sandblasted, large grit, and acid-etched (SLA) surface. To evaluate and report 10-year data on outcomes of implants with an SLA surface placed in the edentulous maxilla. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) cohort of 24 patients, the outcomes of implants with an SLA surface were registered. The RCT cohort has previously been reported after 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years of loading. One patient dropped out of the study prior to the 10-year control. Of the 23 remaining patients, the implant survival rate was 95.1%. If implants of unknown status were also considered lost, that is, one drop-out patient with three implants for whom no information could be obtained, the implant survival rate was 93%. The mean marginal bone loss from baseline (139 implants) to 10 years (102 implants) was 1.07 mm (standard deviation 0.98). One implant out of 102 available for radiographic examination according to the original protocol showed a bone loss exceeding 4 mm. Of the 84 implants available for clinical examination, none showed a Plaque Index or sulcus bleeding index of 3. The mean implant stability quotient was significantly higher for mesial-distal versus buccal-palatal measurements. The implant survival was 95.1%. The mean value of bone loss after 10 years was 1.07 mm. Peri-implantitis were noted at the 5-year follow-up for one patient with a previous history of periodontitis; this patient did not attend the 10-year follow-up. This study shows that sandblasted and acid-etched implants offers predictable long-term results as support for full-arch maxillary prostheses.

Residual periodontal pockets are a risk indicator for peri‐implantitis in patients treated for periodontitis

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of implant treatment in periodontally compromised and periodontally healthy patients (PHP), with a minimum follow-up period of 5years. Thirty treated periodontally compromised patients (PCP) and 30 PHP, with a total of 117 Straumann implants (PCP=56, PHP=61) were matched for age, gender, smoking and implant characteristics. The PCP group was further stratified with patients having at least one periodontal pocket ≥6mm at follow-up examination allocated to a "residual periodontitis" (RP) group, while the remaining patients were assigned to a "no residual periodontitis" (NRP) group. These groups were compared with respect to probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and marginal bone loss. The mean follow-up period in the PCP and PHP groups was 7.99years (range 5.04-14.40) and 8.20years (range 5.00-13.46) respectively. There was no difference in mean PPD between the PCP and PHP groups, but the prevalence of implants with PPD ≥5mm+BOP was greater in the PCP group than in the PHP group, at both implant- (27% vs. 13%) and patient- (37% vs. 17%) level analyses. Mean implant PPD was significantly greater in the RP group (3.18mm) than in both the NRP (2.67mm) and PHP (2.81mm) groups. Mean bone loss was also significantly greater in the RP group (0.68mm) than in the NRP (0.23mm) and PHP groups (0.26mm). The prevalence of bone loss and PPD ≥5mm+BOP at the implant level was significantly greater for the RP group compared with both the NRP and PHP groups. Implants in PCP with residual pocketing at follow-up had increased PPD and bone loss compared with implants placed in PHP and PCP without residual pocketing. Hence, it is the maintenance of periodontal health rather than a previous history of periodontitis that is the critical determinant of increased risk of peri-implantitis, highlighting the importance of effective periodontal therapy and maintenance in patients with a history of periodontitis.

Dental Implant Outcomes may Vary in Patients With a History of Periodontal Disease

This systematic review used a set of defined inclusion criteria and identified 4448 publications. These were sorted and 10 were identified with sufficient strength to be considered in the systematic review. The authors used a series of inclusion criteria to sort though the identified systematic reviews on this topic. Criterion included the following: use of longitudinal studies (up to March 2006) or case series in which all subjects were included, studies addressing only partially edentulous subjects in which a variety of implant systems were used, and reviews that classified and ranked quality of the studies (eg, > 6-month recall, > 10 subjects). All studies were located through a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. The primary prognostic factor in this study was to identify dental implant outcomes (survival or success as defined by the respective studies) and reports of peri-implantitis in subjects with a previous history of periodontitis. The authors focused on 3 outcome measures: implant survival, implant success, and peri-implantitis. The authors' inclusion criteria were generally all inclusive and did not limit studies based on definitions of these 3 outcomes. The authors state that "overall, the non-periodontitis patients demonstrated better outcomes than treated periodontitis patients," yet they admit that there is a "medium to high level of bias" with a lack of consistent outcome variables. They correctly state that owing to the heterogeneity of study designs (p. 459), they were not able to provide a meta-analysis. Unfortunately, the strength of the associations claimed are difficult to assess because there were no reports of odds ratios or confidence intervals. They also report significant inconsistencies between studies for the key outcome variables. For instance, only 3 of the 9 studies reviewed reported any form of peri-implant bone loss associated with inflammation (peri-implantitis). Bone loss was statistically observed in only 1 study, with a nonsignificant trend of greater bone loss in the subjects who had a history of periodontitis in the other studies reviewed. The authors suggest there is "some evidence" that patients treated for periodontitis may experience more implant loss and complications around implants than patients without periodontitis.