Previous Docetaxel Research Articles

Olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROpel): final prespecified overall survival results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

PROpel met its primary endpoint showing statistically significant improvement in radiographic progression-free survival with olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone in patients with first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) unselected by homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) status, with benefit observed in all prespecified subgroups. Here we report the final prespecified overall survival analysis. This was a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 17 countries worldwide. Patients with mCRPC aged at least 18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, a life expectancy of at least 6 months, with no previous systemic treatment for mCRPC and unselected by HRRm status were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by means of an interactive voice response system-interactive web response system to abiraterone acetate (orally, 1000 mg once daily) plus prednisone or prednisolone with either olaparib (orally, 300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The patients, the investigator, and study centre staff were masked to drug allocation. Stratification factors were site of metastases and previous docetaxel at metastatic hormone-sensitive cancer stage. Radiographic progression-free survival was the primary endpoint and overall survival was a key secondary endpoint with alpha-control (alpha-threshold at prespecified final analysis: 0·0377 [two-sided]), evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03732820, and is completed and no longer recruiting. Between Oct 31, 2018 and March 11, 2020, 1103 patients were screened, of whom 399 were randomly assigned to olaparib plus abiraterone and 397 to placebo plus abiraterone. Median follow-up for overall survival in patients with censored data was 36·6 months (IQR 34·1-40·3) for olaparib plus abiraterone and 36·5 months (33·8-40·3) for placebo plus abiraterone. Median overall survival was 42·1 months (95% CI 38·4-not reached) with olaparib plus abiraterone and 34·7 months (31·0-39·3) with placebo plus abiraterone (hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·67-1·00; p=0·054). The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was anaemia reported in 64 (16%) of 398 patients in the olaparib plus abiraterone and 13 (3%) of 396 patients in the placebo plus abiraterone group. Serious adverse events were reported in 161 (40%) in the olaparib plus abiraterone group and 126 (32%) in the placebo plus abiraterone group. One death in the placebo plus abiraterone group, from interstitial lung disease, was considered treatment related. Overall survival was not significantly different between treatment groups at this final prespecified analysis. Supported by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Androgen receptor signaling mechanism in prostate cancer: resistance to antiandrogen therapy and association with DNA repair genes

Background. Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remains a complex problem due to patients' previous treatments and limited selection of subsequent therapies. While 2nd generation antiandrogens are initially effective, resistance to them is not an exceptional event. Mechanisms depending on androgen receptor and independent of it have been described. A special focus is on mutations in DNA repair genes, particularly genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR) as a possible cause of somatic genetic abnormalities specifically in progressive metastatic disease. However, data on the effect of the HRR defect on the effectiveness of antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer are very limited, which requires additional clinical studies.Aim. To evaluate the effect of clinical, morphological, molecular and genetic factors on the effectiveness of enzalutamide antiandrogen therapy in patients with prostate cancer and known mutations in DNA repair genes involved in HRR and mismatch repair.Materials and methods. The study was performed at the Clinical Oncological Dispensary No. 1 (Krasnodar). Retrospective analysis of clinical and morphological parameters of 54 patients with prostate cancer who received enzalutamide antiandrogen therapy and with known status of germ line and somatic mutations of HRR DNA repair genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, BARD, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD54L, FANCL) and microsatellite instability in immunohistochemical determination of mismatch repair deficit was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.22 software.Results and conclusion. In 17 of 54 patients, pathogenic germline and somatic mutations of HRR genes were detected: 7 mutations in BRCA2 gene, 4 - in CHEK2, 2 - in BRCA1, 2 - in CDK12, 1 - in BRIP1 and 1 - in ATM. It was shown that in the group of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, histological grade per the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) G2 (total Gleason score 7 (3 + 4)) is significantly associated with the absence of HRR mutation, and grade G3 (total Gleason score 7 (4 + 3)) was associated with HRR mutations (р <0.05). Increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level/biochemical progression 12-16 weeks after enzalutamide therapy start was significantly associated with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without HRR mutations (р <0.05). In case of tumor response to enzalutamide therapy, decrease in PSA level did not depend on the age of disease onset, differentiation grade, primary advancement, previous docetaxel treatment, and presence of HRR mutation. Cox multivariate regression test showed that prescription of docetaxel before enzalutamide increased the risk of PSA-progression (hazard ratio (HR) 5.160; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.549-17.189; р = 0.008) and radiographic progression (HR 5.161; 95 % CI 1.550-17.187; р = 0.008). Progression risk decreased with increased level of PSA decrease 12-16 weeks after enzalutamide therapy start: for PSA decrease >30 % HR 0.150; 95 % CI 0.040-0.570; р = 0.005; for PSA decrease >50 % HR 0.039; 95 % CI 0.006-0.280; р = 0.001; for PSA decrease >90 % HR 0.116; 95 % CI 0.036-0.375; р = 0.000. Presence of HRR mutation, age <58 years, primary metastatic disease and poorly differentiated morphology did not affect duration without PSA-progression (p >0.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a trend towards increased time to development of castration resistance in the group of primary early cancer (Breslow р = 0.06; Tarone-Ware р = 0.062). Subgroup analysis showed that in the cohort of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (n = 48), absence of HRR mutation in patients who previously received docetaxel therapy increases time to PSA-progression compared to patients with mutations (log-rank р <0.05).

Activity of lutetium-177 PSMA (Lu-PSMA) and determinants of outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with cabazitaxel: The PACAP study.

180 Background: Cabazitaxel and Lu-PSMA both improved survival in patients with mCRPC after docetaxel and an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), but there is limited data regarding Lu-PSMA activity after cabazitaxel. We aimed at assessing activity of Lu-PSMA and determinants of outcomes in this setting. Methods: Consecutive mCRPC patients from 6 European centers treated with Lu-PSMA after cabazitaxel were included in this retrospective study. Endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to PSA progression (PSA-TTP), PSA decline, objective response, overall survival, and safety. Results: Of 101 patients included (median age 67y), 64% had ISUP grade 4-5 disease; 71% had bone +/- nodal (LN) metastases, 22% visceral metastases, 7% LN only. All patients and 92% had received previous docetaxel and a prior ARPI (≥ 2 in 47%) before cabazitaxel respectively. Patients had received a median number of 6 cabazitaxel cycles (range 1-26). DNA damage repair alterations (DDR) were found in 11/48 (23%) patients with available testing. Patients received a median number of 3 Lu-PSMA cycles (range 1-14). With a median follow-up of 5.7 months, the median rPFS from Lu-PSMA initiation was 4.3 months (m, 95%CI 3.2-5.7) and median PSA-TTP was 3.5 m (95%CI 3.0-4.5). Overall, 44 patients (44%) experienced a PSA decline ≥ 50% (PSA50), 54 (53%) ≥ 30% (PSA30), and 67 (66%) any PSA decline. Objective response rate was 34%. Baseline characteristics associated with shorter rPFS on Lu-PSMA included ISUP grade 4-5 disease (median rPFS of 3.5 vs. 7.2m, p=0.02) and a time to castration resistance < 12 months (3.1m vs. 4.5m, p=0.04). Patients with LN only had longer rPFS compared to those with bone and visceral metastases (median NR vs. 3.6 and 3.7m, respectively, p=0.02). There was no association between activity of Lu-PSMA and DNA damage repair alterations, duration of previous cabazitaxel therapy, and number of previous ARPI. During Lu-PSMA, a profound PSA decline was associated with longer rPFS: patients achieving PSA50, PSA30 or any PSA decline had respective median rPFS rates of 9.0, 8.3 and 6.2 months, while those who did not experience any PSA decline had a median rPFS of only 2.6 months. Conclusions: Lu-PSMA demonstrated substantial PSA decline but limited duration of response after cabazitaxel in a real-life setting. Adverse baseline characteristics and absence of PSA decline may help early identification of poor responders.

CCTG PR21: A randomized phase II study of [177lu]lu-PSMA-617 verus docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and PSMA-positive disease (NCT04663997).

TPS5110 Background: [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 improves outcome in men with metastatic, PSMA positive CRPC post androgen pathway inhibitor therapy and taxane chemotherapy compared to standard care (excluding chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radium-223 and investigational drugs; Sartor et al, NEJM 2021). The relative efficacy, adverse event experience and impact on QOL of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 compared to docetaxel chemotherapy in this patient population is unknown. We hypothesize that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 will improve radiographic PFS (rPFS) compared to docetaxel chemotherapy with a favourable safety and tolerability profile. Methods: CCTG PR21 is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group randomized phase II trial with a primary objective to compare rPFS between [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7.4 GBq (+/- 10%) IV q 6 weekly (maximum 6 cycles) versus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q 3 weekly (maximum 12 cycles). Secondary objectives are to compare the two arms with respect to: 6-month PFS rate (PCWG3 and RECIST 1.1), second rPFS after crossover to the alternate therapy, time to commencement of 3rd line systemic therapy, OS, PSA decline from baseline, clinical benefit rate and adverse events. Tertiary objectives include evaluation of QOL (FACT-P and EQ5D-5L), cost effectiveness, ctDNA and radiographic based prognostic and predictive biomarkers, dosimetry based approach to measurement of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 activity and creation of tissue and image biobanks. Key eligibility criteria include: mCRPC with PSMA positive disease using 18F or 68Ga radionuclide label, progression on ADT + ARPI therapy (using PSA, RECIST 1.1 or PCWG3 criteria) and adequate organ function. Statistical Design: Patients are allocated in 1:1 ratio to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or docetaxel balanced for stratification factors of ECOG PS, LDH, visceral metastases, previous docetaxel in the castration sensitive setting > 1 year prior to enrollment as well as centre. Assuming a 6-month median rPFS for the control group, the detection of a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 with 80% power using a 1-sided 5% level test will require accrual of 200 participants in 24 months with 12-month follow-up to trigger the primary analysis. Conduct to Date: Study activation Dec 17 2020. Enrollment as of January 31 2022: 25. The DSMC last reviewed and recommended continuation of the trial in December 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04663997.

FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with or without prior docetaxel – results from the phase II RAMIRIS Study of the German Gastric Cancer Study Group at AIO

BackgroundRamucirumab and paclitaxel is the standard second-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the efficacy and safety analyses of FOLFIRI and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab after the failure of a platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy. MethodsThis multicenter, investigator initiated, phase II trial randomised patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to either FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM) (arm A) or paclitaxel plus RAM (arm B). The primary end-point was 6-month overall survival (OS) rate, with a proportion of ≥65% in arm A considered a positive signal for further investigation. Results111 patients (65% of patients had prior docetaxel) were enrolled and 110 patients qualified for ITT population (arm A, 72; arm B, 38). The study did not meet the primary end-point for the comparison with historical control, as 6-month OS rate in the FOLFIRI plus RAM arm was 54% (95% CI 44–67). In between arm comparison, OS was similar (hazard ratio, HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.62–1.52]), while objective response rates (ORRs) and PFS were numerically better in arm A versus arm B (HR for PFS 0.73; ORR, 22% versus 11%). These differences were largely attributed to favourable efficacy results for arm A in docetaxel-pretreated patients (HR, 0.49; ORR, 25% versus 8%). In the safety population (n = 106), grade 3-5 adverse events were similar between arms (arm A, 75%; arm B, 68%). ConclusionThe RAMIRIS trial demonstrated feasibility of FOLFIRI plus RAM. While the study was formally negative, it provided a signal to further investigate this combination for the group of patients with previous docetaxel therapy. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03081143.

200P - Apalutamide (APA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Analysis of pain and fatigue in the TITAN study

200P - Apalutamide (APA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Analysis of pain and fatigue in the TITAN study

1168P - Trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with advanced HER2-positive salivary duct carcinoma: Exploratory biomarker analyses

BackgroundA phase II trial of trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with advanced HER2–positive salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) showed 70% of the overall response rate. However, biomarkers which predict survival in this population remain unknown. MethodsA total of 91 patients with HER2–positive SDC treated with trastuzumab plus docetaxel were included. Age, sex, ECOG performance status (PS), status of visceral metastases, previous treatment, previous docetaxel exposure, previous combined androgen blockade, the best overall response to the treatment, pretreatment serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, modified Glasgow Prognosis Score (mGPS), HER2 status (immunohistochemistry [IHC] score, HER2/CEP17 ratio, HER2 copy number, overall positivity according to ASCO/CAP Guidelines), mutational status of PIK3CA, HRAS, and TP53, IHC score of AR, Ki-67, CK5/6, p53, HER3, Akt, PI3K, FOXA1, adipophilin, mTOR and PTEN were assessed and correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ResultsTreatment response (PR or CR vs. SD or PD) and PTEN IHC score (1+ – 3+ vs. 0) were related with favorable PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25 and 0.39, respectively) and OS (HR, 0.29 and 0.36, respectively). CRP (≥ 0.50mg/dL) was related with shorter PFS (HR, 2.28) and OS (HR 4.46). Presence of previous treatment and mTOR IHC (1+ – 3+ vs. 0) had significant predictive value of better PFS (HR 0.47 and 0.22, respectively) but not significantly related with OS. ECOG PS of 1-2 (vs. 0), presence of visceral metastasis, and mGPS of 1-2 (vs. 0) had significant relationship with shorter OS but not with PFS. Neither previous docetaxel exposure nor previous combined androgen blockade did not affect the survival outcome. HER2, PIK3CA, HRAS and TP53 status did not related with survival. ConclusionsAlthough HER2 status did not correlated with survival, its downstream factors PTEN and mTOR can serve as predictive biomarkers in patients with advanced SDC treated with trastuzumab plus docetaxel. Serum CRP level may predict survival of this population. Clinical trial identificationUMIN000009437, Released on 03/12/2012. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingMEXT/JSPS. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

BackgroundApalutamide is an inhibitor of the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor. Whether the addition of apalutamide to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) would prolong radiographic progression–free survival and overall survival as compared with placebo plus ADT among patients with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer has not been determined.MethodsIn this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo, added to ADT. Previous treatment for localized disease and previous docetaxel therapy were allowed. The primary end points were radiographic progression–free survival and overall survival.ResultsA total of 525 patients were assigned to receive apalutamide plus ADT and 527 to receive placebo plus ADT. The median age was 68 years. A total of 16.4% of the patients had undergone prostatectomy or received radiotherapy for localized disease, and 10.7% had received previous docetaxel therapy; 62.7% had high-volume disease, and 37.3% had low-volume disease. At the first interim analysis, with a median of 22.7 months of follow-up, the percentage of patients with radiographic progression–free survival at 24 months was 68.2% in the apalutamide group and 47.5% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for radiographic progression or death, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.60; P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was also greater with apalutamide than with placebo (82.4% in the apalutamide group vs. 73.5% in the placebo group; hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89; P=0.005). The frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 42.2% in the apalutamide group and 40.8% in the placebo group; rash was more common in the apalutamide group.ConclusionsIn this trial involving patients with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, overall survival and radiographic progression–free survival were significantly longer with the addition of apalutamide to ADT than with placebo plus ADT, and the side-effect profile did not differ substantially between the two groups. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; TITAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02489318.)

Are there any significant impacts of patient age and prior treatment profile with docetaxel on the efficacy of cabazitaxel in patient with castration-resistant prostate cancer?

e16522 Background: The correlation of the oncological outcomes of patient age in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients have not been unclear. Materials and Methods: This study included a total of 56 consecutive Japanese mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel and assessed the prognostic significance of cabazitaxel at Keio University Hospital from 2014 to 2019 were included., focusing on patient age and the correlation of efficacy between docetaxel and cabazitaxel. All patients received cabazitaxel at 20-25 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 of each treatment cycle, together with prednisone 5 mg twice daily. Prophylactic administration of G-CSF was prescribed to all the patients. Results: The median overall survival (OS) periods after the introduction of cabazitaxel was 16.1 months. A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 5 (50.0%) patients with ≧75 years (n = 10) and 19 (41.3%) patients with less than 75 years (n = 46). There was no significant correlation between the PSA response and patients’ age (p = 0.087). A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 25 (43.9%) patients. A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 15 (57.6%) and 10 (33.3%) patients with and without that to docetaxel, respectively. There was no significant correlation of the PSA response between docetaxel and cabazitaxel (p = 0.106). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that there were no significant correlation of patient age, the response to prior docetaxel therapyor cycles of docetaxel therapy with shorter OS. Conclusions: These results indicate that the introduction of cabazitaxel for mCRPC patients could result in oncological outcomes without any association with patient’s age and the profiles of previous docetaxel therapy.

No significant impact of patient age and prior treatment profile with docetaxel on the efficacy of cabazitaxel in patient with castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundThe correlation of the oncological outcomes of docetaxel and cabazitaxel in Japanese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients has not been unclear.Materials and methodsThis study included a total of 47 consecutive Japanese mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel and assessed the prognostic significance of cabazitaxel, focusing on patient age and the correlation of efficacy between docetaxel and cabazitaxel.ResultsProstate-specific antigen (PSA) decline was observed in 27 patients (57.4%), including 19 (40.0%) achieving the response defined by PSA decline ≥ 30%. The median overall survival (OS) periods after the introduction of cabazitaxel was 16.1 months. Twenty (42.6%) were judged to have responded to cabazitaxel with a PSA decrease ≥ 30% from the baseline. A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 4 (50.0%) patients with ≧ 75 years (n = 8) and 16 (41.0%) patients with less than 75 years (n = 39). There was no significant correlation between the PSA response and patients’ age (p = 0.707). A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 13 (46.4%) and 7 (36.8%) patients with and without that to docetaxel, respectively. A 30% PSA response to cabazitaxel was achieved in 5 (16.6%) and 7 (41.2%) patients who had treated with less than 10 cycles docetaxel or 10 ≦ cycles, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that there were no significant correlation of patient age (p = 0.537), the response to prior docetaxel therapy (p = 0.339) or cycles of docetaxel therapy (p = 0.379) with shorter OS.ConclusionThese results indicate that the introduction of cabazitaxel for Japanese mCRPC patients could result in oncological outcomes without any association with patient’s age and the profiles of previous docetaxel therapy.

PIH13 - ABIRATERONE: A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Abiraterone is approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who have progressed after a docetaxel regimen and those that were on androgen deprivation therapy and not eligible for chemotherapy. This study aims to contribute with real-world data on Abiraterone overall survival (OS) and PSA response between two groups of patients: exposed and not exposed to previous docetaxel chemotherapy. Furthermore, safety profile was also evaluated in both groups. Retrospective cohort chart review study over a 5 year period (January 2013 to January 2018). One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled in the study with a median age of 78 years (range: 48-96). Sixty three patients (52.5%) were not exposed to docetaxel chemotherapy and 47.5% (n=57) were exposed. Comparing the two groups of patients it was observed that those that were not exposed to docetaxel had a significant PSA response rate (63.3% vs 40.0%; p= 0.01). The median overall survival was 29 ± 6.5 [95% CI 16.2-41.8] months for the docetaxel exposed group and 32.5 ± 4.0 [95% CI 24.6-40.4] for the not exposed docetaxel group (log–rank test p value = 0.125). In both groups 80% (n= 96) of patients had documented adverse events, being the most common asthenia 26.7% and peripheral edema 22,5%. Our study indicates that although not reaching statistical significance, those patients that were not exposed to prior docetaxel chemotherapy had an improved overall survival. It was also observed that the PSA response rate was better indicating improved prognosis. The adverse events were not serious or life-threatening. No new safety signals were identified.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Radium-223 Dichloride in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Without Previous Chemotherapy Treatment in Spain.

PurposeTo perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of radium-223 plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) compared to BSC in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and without previous docetaxel treatment in Spain.Design and methodsA Markov model was developed to compare radium-223 versus BSC and to accrue the health outcomes and costs of a simulated cohort of mCRPC patients. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and life year (LY) were selected as health outcomes to measure the effectiveness of treatment alternatives. Main health resource use and efficacy inputs were obtained from a randomized controlled trial comparing radium-223 versus placebo. Unit costs were retrieved from Spanish databases and published sources. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to assess uncertainty.ResultsTotal costs and QALYs were €65 067 and 1.12 QALYs for radium-223 and €55 437 and 0.77 QALYs for BSC. Therefore, incremental costs per QALY were €27 606. The sensitivity analysis showed that with a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30 000 per QALY, radium-223 would have a probability of 48% of being cost-effective compared to BSC.ConclusionsAlthough results must be assessed with caution, from the Spanish National Health System perspective and based on the results of the present analysis, radium-223 could be a suitable option of health resources’ utilization for end of life mCRPC without previous docetaxel treatment, subject to a moderate level of uncertainty.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Radium-223 Dichloride in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Without Previous Chemotherapy Treatment in Spain

Purpose: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of radium-223 plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) compared to BSC in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and without previous docetaxel treatment in Spain. Design and methods: A Markov model was developed to compare radium-223 versus BSC and to accrue the health outcomes and costs of a simulated cohort of mCRPC patients. Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and life year (LY) were selected as health outcomes to measure the effectiveness of treatment alternatives. Main health resource use and efficacy inputs were obtained from a randomized controlled trial comparing radium-223 versus placebo. Unit costs were retrieved from Spanish databases and published sources. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to assess uncertainty. Results: Total costs and QALYs were €65 067 and 1.12 QALYs for radium-223 and €55 437 and 0.77 QALYs for BSC. Therefore, incremental costs per QALY were €27 606. The sensitivity analysis showed that with a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30 000 per QALY, radium-223 would have a probability of 48% of being cost-effective compared to BSC. Conclusions: Although results must be assessed with caution, from the Spanish National Health System perspective and based on the results of the present analysis, radium-223 could be a suitable option of health resources’ utilization for end of life mCRPC without previous docetaxel treatment, subject to a moderate level of uncertainty.

Quality of Life in Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Cabazitaxel or Other Therapies After Previous Docetaxel Chemotherapy: Swiss Observational Treatment Registry.

The aim was to evaluate quality of life (QoL), pain, and fatigue in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with different regimens after first-line docetaxel, as well as disease progression. Patients with mCRPC having received first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel were eligible. Second-line treatment choice was at the discretion of the local investigator. All patients had regular assessments of QoL with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire, of fatigue with the Brief Fatigue Inventory, and of pain with the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form. The primary end point was QoL maintenance defined as having a maximum decrease in 2 functional domains of the FACT-P. One hundred thirty-eight patients were included in 36 oncology centers across Switzerland. QoL analysis was available for all patients (59 who received cabazitaxel; 79 who received other therapy [OT] including 75 who received abiraterone). No significant differences for any of the end points were found between groups. A numerically higher number of patients had QoL maintenance with OT (25 of 79 patients, 32%) compared with cabazitaxel (8 of 59 patients, 14%). QoL improvement was found in 20% of patients (12 of 59) who received cabazitaxel and 24% (19 of 79) who received OT. Mean FACT-P score did not change in a clinically relevant manner over time in either group. Pain was present in 70% of patients (96 of 138), and a pain response to treatment was noted in 22% (13 of 59) who received cabazitaxel and 29% (23 of 79) who received OT. A similar but minor improvement of fatigue was noted in both groups. Some degree of QoL decrease was seen in most patients regardless of second-line treatment. Nosignificant differences in QoL parameters between cabazitaxel or other second line treatments were found.

Prostate-specific antigen response in black and white patients treated with abiraterone acetate for metastatic castrate–resistant prostate cancer

PurposeEvidence suggests differences in androgen receptor AR signaling between black (B) and white (W) patients with prostate cancer, but pivotal trials of abiraterone acetate (AA) for patients with metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled few black patients, a population with a higher mortality from prostate cancer. Our primary objective was to determine differences in response to AA between B and W patients. MethodsWe performed a retrospective case-control study of B vs. W patients treated with AA between May 1, 2008 and June 16, 2015 at Duke University Medical Center. Patients were identified (W control patients were matched 2:1 to B patients stratified based on previous docetaxel exposure) through pharmacy records and were eligible if treated with AA for metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer. Patients with previous enzalutamide use were excluded. The primary objective was to compare the rate of≥90% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline between B vs. W patients. Secondary outcomes included comparing time on therapy, time to PSA progression, and overall survival among groups. ResultsBaseline characteristics among patients (n = 45 B, n = 90 W) were identified; these included Karnofsky performance status, PSA, Gleason score, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, opiate use for pain, and metastatic sites. Baseline characteristics among groups were similar except for median hemoglobin (B = 11.4g/dl, W = 12.3g/dl). The proportion of B patients achieving a≥90% PSA level decline was 37.8% vs. 28.9% for W patients (P = 0.296). Statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of patients achieving a≥50% PSA level decline (B = 68.9%, W = 48.9% [P = 0.028]) and≥30% PSA level decline (B = 77.8%, W = 54.4% [P = 0.008]). Rates of primary abiraterone-refractory disease (PSA increase as best response) trended higher in W (31.1%) than in B (15.6%) patients (P = 0.052). Median treatment duration (B = 9.4 mo, W = 8.3 mo) did not differ (Wilcoxon P = 0.444). Median overall survival (B = 27.3 mo [95% CI: 13.9, not estimable], W = 24.8 mo [95% CI: 19, 31.6] [P = 0.669]) and median time to PSA progression (B = 11.0 mo [95% CI: 4.3, 18.0], W = 9.4 mo [95% CI: 6.2, 13.0] [P = 0.917]) did not differ. ConclusionsBlack patients may have a higher PSA response to AA than white patients. An ongoing prospective clinical study (NCT01940276) is evaluating outcomes between black and white patients treated with AA.

Prognostic Value of Automated Bone Scan Index in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate.

Bone scan index (BSI) is an objective tool for quantifying bone metastasis load. We assessed its prognostic usefulness in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with enzalutamide (ENZ) or abiraterone acetate (AA). We analyzed 40 patients who received ENZ or AA treatment (ENZ/AA) for metastatic CRPC. The Cox proportional hazards model and a C-index were used to investigate associations between overall survival (OS) and BSI, and patient age, prostate-specific antigen, time to CRPC, previous docetaxel use, and pain. Median OS after ENZ/AA was 17.8 months. All patient deaths (n= 19; 47.5%) were from prostate cancer. In multivariate analysis, decreased BSI was an independent predictor for longer OS (hazard ratio, 8.97; P= .011). Inclusion of BSI improved the C-index from 0.721 to 0.792 in predicting OS after ENZ/AA. Decreased BSI after ENZ/AA independently predicts longer OS.

Radium-223 dichloride in castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases: a guide to its use

Radium-223 dichloride (Xofigo®) is a first-in-class alpha particle-emitting radiopharmaceutical approved for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastatic disease. As a calcium mimetic, radium-223 dichloride targets areas of high bone turnover, delivering cytotoxic radiation to the sites of bone metastases. In the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial, radium-223 dichloride (administered as six 4-weekly intravenous injections) significantly improved overall survival relative to placebo. The survival benefit was observed irrespective of previous docetaxel use. Radium-223 dichloride also significantly delayed the occurrence of symptomatic skeletal events and had beneficial effects on pain and health-related quality of life. The drug was well tolerated, being associated with low rates of myelosuppression and generally mild gastrointestinal adverse events.

Abstract 1843: Novel actions of next-generation taxanes benefit advanced stages of prostate cancer

Abstract Purpose: To improve the outcomes of patients with castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there is an urgent need for more effective therapies and approaches that individual specific treatments for patients with CRPC. The current studies compared the novel taxane, cabazitaxel with the previous generation docetaxel, and aimed to determine which tumors are most likely to respond. Experimental design: Cabazitaxel (CBTX) and docetaxel (DCTX) were compared via in vitro modeling to determine molecular mechanism, biochemical and cell biological impact, and cell proliferation, which was further assessed ex vivo in human tumor explants. Isogenic pairs of RB knockdown and control cells were interrogated in vitro, and in xenograft tumors for cabazitaxel response. Results: The data herein show that i. CBTX exerts stronger cytostatic and cytotoxic response compared to DCTX, especially in CRPC; ii. CBTX induces aberrant mitosis, leading to pyknotic and multinucleated cells; iii. taxanes do not act through the androgen receptor (AR); iv. Gene expression profiling reveals distinct molecular actions for CBTX v. tumors that have progressed to castration resistance via loss of RB show enhanced sensitivity to CBTX. Conclusions: CBTX not only induces improved cytostatic and cytotoxic effects, but also impacts distinct molecular pathways, compared to DCTX, which could underlie its efficacy after DCTX treatment has failed in CRPC patients. Finally, RB is identified as the first potential biomarker that could define the therapeutic response to taxanes in metastatic CRPC. This would suggest that loss of RB function induces sensitization taxanes, which could benefit up to 50% of CRPC cases. Citation Format: Renee de Leeuw, Lisa Berman-Booty, Matthew Schiewer, Stephen Ciment, Robert Den, Adam Dicker, William Kelly, Edouard Trabulsi, Costas Lallas, Leonard Gomella, Karen Knudsen. Novel actions of next-generation taxanes benefit advanced stages of prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1843. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1843

Incomplete Cross-Resistance Between Taxanes for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Implications for Clinical Practice and Trial Design

BackgroundTaxanes such as paclitaxel and docetaxel are commonly used for second- or third-line salvage systemic therapy for metastatic UC. Although trials have generally excluded previous exposure to taxanes when using a taxane in a salvage therapy trial, taxanes might not be completely cross-resistant. Hence, we aimed to study outcomes with docetaxel after previous paclitaxel and the reverse sequence, to identify the level of cross-resistance between these taxanes. Patients and MethodsData from a randomized phase II trial that compared salvage therapy with docetaxel combined with either placebo or vandetanib for advanced UC were analyzed. Both arms were combined for analysis because no differences in any outcomes were observed. Data were also requested from institutions for patients who received paclitaxel after previous docetaxel treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes. The primary clinical end point of interest was overall survival (OS). ResultsOf 148 patients who received docetaxel with either vandetanib or placebo, 21 had received previous paclitaxel treatment. No difference in OS, progression-free survival, or response rate was observed with docetaxel based on previous paclitaxel treatment after adjusting for known prognostic factors. Among the 8 patients who received paclitaxel after previous docetaxel treatment, partial response was observed in 1 patient (12.5%) and stable disease in 2 patients (25%). ConclusionDocetaxel treatment after previous paclitaxel treatment and the reverse sequence demonstrates activity in advanced UC. There is no strong evidence to disallow patients with previous exposure to a taxane to enroll in a clinical trial involving another taxane.

Efficacy and safety of radium-223 dichloride in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bone metastases, with or without previous docetaxel use: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial

Primary results from the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial showed that radium-223 dichloride (radium-223), a targeted α-emitter, improved overall survival compared with placebo and was well tolerated in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bone metastases. We did a prespecified subgroup analysis from ALSYMPCA to assess the effect of previous docetaxel use on the efficacy and safety of radium-223. In the phase 3, randomised, double-blind ALSYMPCA trial, patients with symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, at least two symptomatic bone metastases, no known visceral metastases, and who were receiving best standard of care were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive six injections of radium-223 (50 kBq/kg intravenously) or matching placebo, with one injection given every 4 weeks. Patients had either received previous docetaxel treatment or were unsuitable for or declined docetaxel; previous docetaxel use (yes or no) was a trial stratification factor. We investigated the effect of previous docetaxel use on radium-223 treatment for the primary endpoint of overall survival, the main secondary efficacy endpoints, and safety. Efficacy analyses were done for the intention-to-treat population; safety analyses were done for the safety population. The trial has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00699751. Randomisation took place between June 12, 2008, and Feb 1, 2011. 526 (57%) of 921 randomly assigned patients had received previous docetaxel treatment (352 in the radium-223 group and 174 in the placebo group) and 395 (43%) had not (262 in the radium-223 group and 133 in the placebo group). Radium-223 prolonged median overall survival compared with placebo, irrespective of previous docetaxel use (previous docetaxel use, hazard ratio [HR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·56-0·88; p=0·002; no previous docetaxel use, HR 0·69, 0·52-0·92; p=0·01). The benefit of radium-223 compared with placebo was seen in both docetaxel subgroups for most main secondary efficacy endpoints; risk for time to time to first symptomatic skeletal event was reduced with radium-223 versus placebo in patients with previous docetaxel use, but the difference was not significant in those with no previous docetaxel use. 322 (62%) of 518 patients previously treated with docetaxel had grade 3-4 adverse events, compared with 205 (54%) of 383 patients without docetaxel. Patients who had previously been treated with docetaxel had a higher incidence of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia with radium-223 than with placebo (31 [9%] of 347 patients vs five [3%] of 171 patients), whereas the incidence was similar between treatment groups among patients with no previous docetaxel use (seven [3%] of 253 patients vs one [1%] of 130 patients). The incidences of grade 3-4 anaemia and neutropenia were similar between the radium-223 and placebo groups within both docetaxel subgroups. Radium-223 is effective and well tolerated in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bone metastases, irrespective of previous docetaxel use. Algeta ASA and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.