BackgroundIn addition to passive case finding (PCF), active case finding (ACF) strategy under National Tuberculosis Elimination Program is a vital secondary prevention intervention under National Strategic Plan (NSP). The present study was conducted to assess ACF's cost-effectiveness compared to PCF in selected public health facilities for the detection of presumptive TB cases under NTEP. Material and methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in randomly selected seven public health facilities of a health block of one district of Himachal Pradesh. Bottom-up costing method was used with bootstrapping of results to assess incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (CEAC) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). ResultsMean cost for ACF and PCF with US$ 3325.8 and 3006.0 respectively to detect all presumptive PTB cases; and US$ 4121.2 and to US$ 3709.0 to confirm all PTB cases. Below WTP threshold (per capita income US$ 2735), WTP 80.3% of simulated ICER values were cost-effective. CEAC showed that saturation was achieved around US$ 300 indicating a likely WTP threshold at which 79.5% of simulated values were cost-effective. For both strategies, One way sensitivity analysis showed the cost is influenced mostly by human resources. ConclusionCurrent study used bottom-up costing method in public health care facilities observed ACF as a cost-effective strategy in reaching out for presumptive PTB. The major cost driver in both strategies is human resource for training, travelling, and administration.