Prevention Of Pancreatitis Research Articles

Intravenous lactated Ringer’s solution alone and in combination with NSAIDs in prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis: an updated systematic review

Intravenous lactated Ringer’s solution alone and in combination with NSAIDs in prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis: an updated systematic review

Nursing Risk Management in the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Objective: To study the role of nursing risk management in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Methods: 80 patients who underwent ERCP in our hospital from December 2023 to April 2024 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group using the random number table method, with 40 cases in each group. The observation group was given nursing risk management interventions and patients in the control group were given routine nursing interventions, and the patients in the two groups were compared in the incidence rate of pancreatitis and the satisfaction of nursing care. Results: The incidence of postoperative pancreatitis in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). The patient satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Nursing risk management after ERCP can reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatitis and improve patient satisfaction.

Nitroglycerin combined with NSAIDs for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized, controlled trials.

Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with an incidence of approximately 9.7% according to some literature reviews. Recent clinical guidelines propose that glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) can reduce the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). However, currently, no guidelines provide an exact opinion on GTN and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. A meta-analysis was performed of published, full-length, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of prophylactic use of GTN, including GTN alone or GTN in combination with NSAIDs, on the prevention of PEP. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. Search terms included "endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography" OR "ERCP," "OR 'PEP' OR 'post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis', pancreatitis," "GTN" OR "glyceryl trinitrate" OR "nitroglycerin," "NSAIDs" OR "Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs" and limited to RCT. A total of 10 RCTs comprising 3240 patients undergoing ERCP were included. Meta-analysis revealed that the administration of GTN was associated with a significant reduction in the overall incidence of PEP. Moreover, PEP incidence was significantly lower in the GTN combined with the NSAIDs group than in the GTN alone group. GTN alone or GTN combined with NSAIDs may not reduce the severity of PEP (risk ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.99; P = .04). The difference in incidence between the 2 groups is 1.01% (6/594) in the GTN with NSAIDs group and 2.36% (14/592) in the placebo group. GTN has a significant benefit in preventing postoperative ERCP pancreatitis (P < .001). And neither GTN nor GTN plus NSAIDs reduces the incidence of non-mild ERCP postoperative pancreatitis. These conclusions need to be confirmed by high-quality randomized controlled studies with multicenter, large samples, and long-term follow-up.

Healthcare disparities in pancreatitis: knowledge gaps and next steps.

This review examines current research on healthcare disparities in pancreatitis, identifies knowledge gaps, and proposes strategies to develop targeted multilevel interventions to address inequities in pancreatitis care. Current literature has identified patient, disease, and healthcare-level factors contributing to disparities in risk factors and health outcomes of pancreatitis. Moreover, social structures, economic systems, social vulnerability, and policy significantly influence the pancreatitis care continuum. Understanding the root causes of health inequities is critical to developing effective approaches for the prevention, early detection, and management of pancreatitis.

Appraisal of Olezarsen for Treatment of Hypertriglyceridemia

Olezarsen is antisense antinucleotide under investigation that inhibits synthesis of apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3) resulting in reduction of plasma triglycerides levels. In a phase 3 clinical trial of patients having familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) with extreme hypertriglyceridemia at baseline (mean plasma triglycerides 2,630 mg/dl), olezarsen 80 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks decreased triglycerides by 43.5 percentage points (95% CI, 69.1 to 17.9; P&lt;0.001) after 6 months compared with placebo. By 53 weeks, 1 episode of acute pancreatitis occurred in olezarsen group versus 11 episodes in the placebo group, rate ratio (RR) 0.12 (95% CI, 0.02 TO 0.66). Two phase 2 trials evaluated olezarsen in patients with moderately elevated triglycerides (&lt;500 mg/dl) and high cardiovascular (CV) risk recorded similar magnitude of reduction of triglycerides. Olezarsen reduced levels of atherogenic lipoproteins such as ApoC3 by 73%, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) by 17-23% and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels by 30-40%. Meanwhile, olezarsen increased mean values of low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) from 22.8 to 37.6 mg/dl in patients with FCS but had no significant effects in patients with high CV risk having higher baseline LDL-C levels. Discontinuation rates due to adverse effects of olezarsen were 9-12% versus 0% with placebo. The most common adverse effects of olezarsen were elevation of liver enzymes, mostly below 3 times the upper limit of normal, and injection-site reactions. Platelet count &lt; 140,000/µl occurred in 18% in patients receiving olezarsen versus 3% with placebo (risk ratio 6.8; 95% CI, 0.91 to 51.3; P=0.03). No patient had severe thrombocytopenia with platelet number &lt; 75,000/µl. Overall, olezarsen is a promising new therapy for hypertriglyceridemia and for prevention of hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis. Long-term randomized trials are urgently needed to examine the effects of olezarsen on CV events and mortality and establish its long-term safety.

Prevention of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis? It is possible.

Prevention of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis? It is possible.

Tailored Hydration With Lactated Ringer's Solution for Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Prevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aggressive hydration using lactated Ringer's solution prevents postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Concerns of this strategy are large volume and lengthy hydration. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tailored aggressive hydration (TAH) for PEP prevention. In this prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial conducted across 3 tertiary Korean hospitals, patients who underwent ERCP for the first time were randomly assigned (1:1) to the tailored standard hydration (TSH) and TAH groups. The TSH group received 1.5 mL/kg/hr lactated Ringer's solution during and after ERCP, whereas the TAH group was administered a 20 mL/kg bolus post-ERCP and 3 mL/kg/hr during and after the procedure. Both groups were assessed for elevated serum amylase levels and pain 4-6 hours after ERCP. If both were absent, hydration was discontinued. If either was present, hydration was continued at the original rate until 8 hours. The primary end point was PEP development and was analyzed on an intention-to-treat analysis. A total of 344 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (171 to the TSH group and 172 to the TAH group). PEP was observed in 9.4% (16/171) in the TSH group and 3.5% (6/172) in the TAH group (relative risk 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.93, P = 0.03). No difference was identified between the 2 groups in PEP severity ( P = 0.80) and complications related to volume overload ( P = 0.32). TAH according to the presence of abdominal pain or elevated serum amylase levels at 4-6 hours after ERCP is safe and prevents PEP development.

Association between gut microbiota and acute pancreatitis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.

The dysbiosis of gut microbiota has been reported in acute pancreatitis. However, the direction and magnitude between host microbiota and pancreas remains to be established. This study investigated the association between gut microbiota and acute pancreatitis using Mendelian randomization (MR) methods. Summary statistics of gut microbiota abundance and acute pancreatitis were extracted from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The two-sample bidirectional MR design was employed to assess genetic association between the microbiota and pancreatitis, followed by a comprehensive sensitivity analysis to verify the robustness of the results. Seven microbiota taxa have been identified as significantly associated with the development of pancreatitis. Host genetic-driven order Bacteroidales and class Bacteroidia are associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis. The genera Coprococcus and Eubacterium fissicatena group also exhibit a positive effect on the development of pancreatitis, while the genera Prevotella, Ruminiclostridium, and Ruminococcaceae act as protective factors against pancreatitis. In contrast, acute pancreatitis was positively correlated with phylum Proteobacteria and genus Lachnospiraceae and negatively correlated with genus Holdemania. The bidirectional relationship between gut microbiota and acute pancreatitis suggests a critical role for host-microbiota crosstalk in the development of the disease. Targeted modulation of specific gut microbiota enables the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis.

Pancreas-directed AAV8-hSPINK1 gene therapy safely and effectively protects against pancreatitis in mice

ObjectiveCurrently, there is no cure for chronic pancreatitis (CP). Germline loss-of-function variants in SPINK1 (encoding trypsin inhibitor) are common in patients with CP and are associated with acute attacks and...

Ulinastatitis in Complex Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis (Literature Review)

The purpose of this literature review is to assess the completeness and significance of recent research on the treatment of a destructive form of pancreatitis for public health and scientific achievements, highlighting areas that require further detailed study. A review of foreign literature on the use of the protease inhibitor ulinastatin in the complex conservative treatment and prevention of acute pancreatitis is made. The clinical and laboratory effectiveness of the drug in preventing the transition of uninfected pancreatic necrosis into a complicated purulent-necrotic form with the development of abdominal sepsis, as well as the effect on treatment results and mortality, has been demonstrated. Existing schemes and modes of application are given. In recent years, significant scientific achievements have been presented in the field of treatment of acute pancreatitis, especially in the context of its destructive forms. The results of numerous studies have made it possible to formulate recommendations aimed at optimizing treatment approaches and improving the prognosis of this condition. Studies have identified key factors affecting the prognosis and outcome of treatment of acute pancreatitis, including the degree of destruction of the pancreas, clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients, as well as complications associated with various treatment methods. These data will allow surgeons to develop individual treatment strategies, taking into account the specifics of each case. Ulinastatin is not only a protease inhibitor, but also has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Based on the results of numerous foreign studies, the high clinical and laboratory effectiveness of ulinastainin the complex drug therapy of acute pancreatitis has been proven. And also, to prevent it and/or hyperfermentemia during ERCP and extended operations on the organs of the pancreato-duodenal zone. Ulinastatin is most effective in the edematous form of AP and aseptic pancreatic necrosis. In case of infected pacreonecrosis with severe organ-systemic failure or the formation of purulent-necrotic foci in the retroperitoneum (abdominal sepsis), the drug is not effective.

A quality improvement project to improve treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia in veterans.

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) is associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Prompt recognition and treatment of sHTG is key for prevention of acute pancreatitis and its associated life-threatening complications. Patients with sHTG at a primary care clinic within the Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System were receiving suboptimal treatment that did not align with evidence-based guidelines. We initiated a quality improvement (QI) project to improve the management of sHTG in an outpatient primary care clinic. Veterans with a triglyceride level between 500 and 1,500 mg/dl were included in the project. Project interventions included provider education, patient education, and targeted electronic consultations (e-consults) with treatment recommendations. The primary outcome was to decrease the percentage of patients with triglycerides ≥500 mg/dl by 25%. The secondary outcome was to decrease the mean triglyceride level of the patient population by 15%. Education on evaluation and treatment of sHTG was given to 100% (n = 21) of primary care clinicians. Overall, 72.8% (95% CI [62.6-81.6%]) of patients (n = 67) received appropriate written education materials, and 72.8% (95% CI [62.6-81.6%]) of patients (n = 67) received a targeted e-consult. The percentage of patients with sHTG decreased by 47%. Average triglyceride level decreased from 651 to 483 mg/dl (25.8% decrease). A multipronged QI project consisting of provider education, patient education, and targeted e-consults resulted in decreased triglyceride levels and improved access to specialist expertise. Clinical implications include decreased prevalence of sHTG and risk of acute pancreatitis among patients in the project.

Double Postbulbar Block in the Prevention of Postmanipulation Pancreatitis

Abstract The problems of preventing postmanipulation pancreatitis (PMP) remain the subject of debate and a lot of research from leading scientific clinics around the world. The article is devoted to the assessment of prevention methods of PMP in patients with lesion of the pancreaticobiliary zone who underwent transpapillary interventions. Aim of the study Evaluation of the effectiveness of the author’s method of preventing PMP.Material and methods A prospective two-center randomized study included 545 patients treated in the Department of Liver Surgery and General Surgery in 2020–2022, who underwent ERCP and endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. There were 146 (26.8%) male patients, and 399 (73.2%) female patients, aged from 18 to 92 years, the mean age 62.7±7.4 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the method of preventing PMP: in the 1st group, standard drug premedication was supplemented with two postbulbar blocks with a solution of lidocaine 0.5% 10 ml before and after the intervention (RF Patent No. 2779221, 09/05/2022), in the 2nd group standard premedication was combined with placebo was used, and in the comparison group 3 no submucosal injections were performed. The monitoring of clinical manifestations of PMP and the level of amylase was carried out every 12 hours until the parameters normalized. Statistical processing was carried out using program STATISTICA 6.1 for Windows.Results The frequency of mild pancreatitis, corresponding to the criteria for PMP, did not exceed 18% in groups 1 and 3 (p=0.3408), but was lower with pseudo postbulbar block, 9% (χ2=2.83, р=0.0926), the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of severe pancreatitis was significantly lower in group 1 with double postbulbar block where there were no cases of pancreatic necrosis among 143 patients (χ2=6.19, р=0.0129). The mortality did not differ significantly among groups (χ2=0.15, р=0.7004). The duration of the hospital period had significant differences between groups (Student’s t-test 1.973, p=0.001). The hospital period with double postbulbar block turned out to be significantly shorter.Conclusion 1. Double postbulbar blockade significantly reduces the risk of developing severe postmanipulation pancreatitis, regardless of existing risk factors. 2. Double postbulbar block significantly reduces the duration of the hospital period after endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. 3. Pseudo postbulbar block using saline requires further evaluation as a possible way to prevent mild pancreatitis.

Peculiarities of pharmacological prevention strategy of pancreatic complications after endoscopic papillosphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

The most frequent complication of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy (EPST) is acute pancreatitis. This complication is supposed to be based on mechanical, chemical, hydrostatic, enzymatic and thermal impact on pancreatic ducts and parenchyma. According to different literature data, the incidence of post-EPST pancreatitis (PEP) varies from 30 to 40%, and the mortality rate is 2-10%. The aim of the investigation was to expand information about peculiarities of early diagnostics and prevention of post-EST pancreatitis at the present stage. To reach the set goal we analyzed 559 case histories of patients with diagnosed cholelithiasis, 319 of them underwent EPST. During the study it was found out, that elevated neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio over 4,96 (p=0,001), high LDH level over 250 IU/ml (p=0,01), as well as C-reactive to albumin index over 0,180 (p=0,001) are reliable markers of early diagnosis. Also, indirect diagnostic markers of PEEP are biochemical signs of cholestasis and cytolysis of hepatocytes, as well as hyperglycemia combined with glucosuria. We consider the inclusion of intraoperative injections of papillotomy wound margins with Epinephrine in combination with subsequent Somatostatin administration in combination with rectal Diclofenac and intravenous hydration with Reamberin to be the most effective strategy for PEP prevention. Thus, we can conclude that despite the ongoing research and the search for effective algorithms for the prevention and early diagnosis of PEP, their data often contradict each other or simply do not confirm their effectiveness. The problem of prevention and diagnosis of PEP remains complex and requires further study. There are discrepancies, sometimes significant ones, in the current literature, which provides grounds for the development and research of new methods of early diagnosis and prevention.

Lipid levels and risk of acute pancreatitis using bidirectional Mendelian randomization

Previous studies found lipid levels, especially triglycerides (TG), are associated with acute pancreatitis, but their causalities and bi-directions were not fully examined. We determined whether abnormal levels of TG, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are precursors and/or consequences of acute pancreatitis using bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) with two non-overlapping genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics for lipid levels and acute pancreatitis. We found phenotypic associations that both higher TG levels and lower HDL-C levels contributed to increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Our GWAS meta-analysis of acute pancreatitis identified seven independent signals. Genetically predicted TG was positively associated with acute pancreatitis when using the variants specifically associated with TG using univariable MR [Odds ratio (OR), 95% CI 2.02, 1.22–3.31], but the reversed direction from acute pancreatitis to TG was not observed (mean difference = 0.003, SE = 0.002, P-value = 0.138). However, a bidirectional relationship of HDL-C and acute pancreatitis was observed: A 1-SD increment of genetically predicted HDL-C was associated with lower risk of acute pancreatitis (OR, 95% CI 0.84, 0.76–0.92) and genetically predisposed individuals with acute pancreatitis have, on average, 0.005 SD lower HDL-C (mean difference = − 0.005, SE = 0.002, P-value = 0.004). Our MR analysis confirms the evidence of TG as a risk factor of acute pancreatitis but not a consequence. A potential bidirectional relationship of HDL-C and acute pancreatitis occurs and raises the prospect of HDL-C modulation in the acute pancreatitis prevention and treatment.

Lifestyle Medicine for the Prevention and Treatment of Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer.

The incidence of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is on the upswing in the USA. These conditions often lead to higher healthcare costs due to the complex nature of diagnosis and the need for specialized medical interventions, surgical procedures, and prolonged medical management. The economic ramification encompasses direct healthcare expenses and indirect costs related to productivity losses, disability, and potential long-term care requirements. Increasing evidence underscores the importance of a healthy lifestyle in preventing and managing these conditions. Lifestyle medicine employs evidence-based interventions to promote health through six key pillars: embracing a whole-food, plant-predominant dietary pattern; regular physical activity; ensuring restorative sleep; managing stress effectively; removing harmful substances; and fostering positive social connections. This review provides a comprehensive overview of lifestyle interventions for managing and preventing the development of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Intravenous Hemin, a potential heme oxygenase-1 activator, does not protect from post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in humans: Results of a randomized multicentric multinational placebo-controlled trial

ObjectiveHemin, a heme oxygenase 1 activator has shown efficacy in the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis in mouse models. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the protective effect of Hemin administration to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in patients at risk. MethodsIn this multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind RCT, we assigned patients at risk for PEP to receive a single intravenous dose of Hemin (4 mg/kg) or placebo immediately after ERCP. Patients were considered to be at risk on the basis of validated patient- and/or procedure-related risk factors. Neither rectal NSAIDs nor pancreatic stent insertion were allowed in randomized patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included lipase elevation, mortality, safety, and length of stay. ResultsA total of 282 of the 294 randomized patients had complete follow-up. Groups were similar in terms of clinical, laboratory, and technical risk factors for PEP. PEP occurred in 16 of 142 patients (11.3%) in the Hemin group and in 20 of 140 patients (14.3%) in the placebo group (p = 0.48). Incidence of severe PEP reached 0.7% and 4.3% in the Hemin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Significant lipase elevation after ERCP did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay, mortality and severe adverse events rates were similar between groups. ConclusionWe failed to detect large improvements in PEP rate among participants at risk for PEP who received IV hemin immediately after the procedure compared to placebo. Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01855841).

Cholecystectomy in Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Cholecystectomy has been a subject of debate regarding its timing and utility in cases of mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to critically evaluate the role of early cholecystectomy in the management of mild and moderate AP, considering patient's characteristics, associated procedures, and overall impact on patient outcomes. Methods: The study compared the outcomes between patients admitted in a tertiary care surgical center undergoing early ( 96h) versus delayed ( 96h) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for mild and moderately severe acute gallstone pancreatitis between January 2019 and December 2022. Results: The study included 54 cases [mean (standard deviation) age, 59.4 (16.5) years; 31 (57.4%) years females]. All patients underwent LC, with 29 cases undergoing a two-phase therapeutic regimen for common bile duct (CBD) lithiasis, consisting of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by sequential LC. The early cholecystectomy group (EC) comprised 17 patients (31.5%), while the delayed cholecystectomy group (DC) included 37 patients (68.5%). EC was significantly correlated with lower length of stay (p-value 0.0001) and significantly lower rate of ERCP usage during perioperative period. Conclusions: EC in the first 4 days after admission provides significant benefits such as prevention of recurrent pancreatitis, reduction in complications, and decreased length of stay for patients with mild and moderately severe AP.

Nafamostat Reduces the Incidence of post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). As the management of pancreatitis is limited, clinical approaches focus on the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). In theory, the serine protease inhibitor nafamostat can reduce circulating inflammatory mediators in pancreatitis. We aimed to investigate the effect of nafamostat in the prevention of PEP in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022367988). We systematically searched 5 databases without any filters on September 26, 2022. The eligible population was adult patients undergoing ERCP. We compared the PEP preventive effect of nafamostat to placebo. The main outcome was the occurrence of PEP. We calculated the pooled odds ratios (ORs), mean differences, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and multilevel model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Rob2 tool. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 2,962 patients were eligible for inclusion. Nafamostat reduced the overall incidence rate of PEP (20 mg, OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30-0.82 and 50 mg, OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.96). However, the occurrence of mild PEP was significantly reduced only in the subgroup receiving 20 mg nafamostat (OR, 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.77). Overall, nafamostat therapy reduced moderate PEP in high-risk patients (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.0.4-0.84) and mild PEP in low-risk patients (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.61). Nafamostat is an effective therapy in the prevention of mild post-ERCP pancreatitis. Further research is required to determine the cost-effectiveness of this therapy.

Efficacy of nafamostat mesylate in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of nafamostat on the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). PubMed, Web of Science, and Ichushi Web were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using nafamostat to prevent PEP. In subgroup analyses, we studied the preventive effects of nafamostat according to the severity of PEP, risk category, and dose. A random-effects model was adopted; heterogeneity between studies was examined using the chi-squared test and I2 statistics. This analysis uses the PRISMA statement as general guidance. 9 RCTs involving 3321 patients were included. The risk of PEP was lower in the nafamostat group than in the control group [4.4% vs. 8.3%, risk ratio (RR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36–0.68]. In subgroup analyses, the protective effects were evident in low-risk patients for PEP before ERCP (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21–0.55). The association between PEP and nafamostat was significant only in patients who developed mild PEP (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.36–0.69). The benefits were independent of the dose. The prophylactic use of nafamostat resulted in a lower risk of PEP. The subgroup analyses suggested uncertain benefits for severe PEP or high-risk patients for PEP. This warrants further investigation through additional RCTs.

Peculiarities of pharmacological prevention strategy of pancreatic complications after endoscopic papillosphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

The most frequent complication of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy (EPST) is acute pancreatitis. This complication is supposed to be based on mechanical, chemical, hydrostatic, enzymatic and thermal impact on pancreatic ducts and parenchyma. According to different literature data, the incidence of post-EPST pancreatitis (PEP) varies from 30 to 40%, and the mortality rate is 2–10%. The aim of the investigation was to expand information about peculiarities of early diagnostics and prevention of post-EST pancreatitis at the present stage. To reach the set goal we analyzed 559 case histories of patients with diagnosed cholelithiasis, 319 of them underwent EPST. During the study it was found out, that elevated neutrophils/ lymphocytes ratio over 4.96 (p = 0.001), high LDH level over 250 IU/ml (p = 0,010), as well as C-reactive to albumin index over 0,180 (p = 0.001) are reliable markers of early diagnosis. Also, indirect diagnostic markers of PEEP are biochemical signs of cholestasis and cytolysis of hepatocytes, as well as hyperglycemia combined with glucosuria. We consider the inclusion of intraoperative injections of papillotomy wound margins with epinephrine in combination with subsequent Somatostatin administration in combination with rectal diclofenac and intravenous hydration with Reamberin to be the most effective strategy for PEP prevention. Thus, we can conclude that despite the ongoing research and the search for effective algorithms for the prevention and early diagnosis of PEP, their data often contradict each other or simply do not confirm their effectiveness. The problem of prevention and diagnosis of PEP remains complex and requires further study. There are discrepancies, sometimes significant ones, in the current literature, which provides grounds for the development and research of new methods of early diagnosis and prevention.