Abstract Behavioral activation (BA) has emerged as an effective intervention for major depressive disorder. Previous research has indicated that it is as effective as the full cognitive treatment package (CBT). Conceptualized to consume fewer participant sessions, BA may be more efficient and cost-effective than CBT. With depression among the most common diagnoses in practice settings, NIMH's recent vision statement calls for continued research devoted to cost- and time-effective targeted treatment alternatives, including behavioral activation as a more simply form of CBT (NIMH, 2005, p. 92). The present investigation piloted a 10-week individual intervention model of BA with medicated and unmedicated participants in a clinical research setting. This follows our earlier report (Porter, Spates, & Smitham, 2004) of an efficacious group-administered BA intervention. In comparison to the group intervention, end state functioning of participants in the present investigation revealed more robust symptom reductions to within the fully recovered range of functioning. Keywords: depression, activation, behavior therapy, cognitive therapy. ********** Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most prevalent psychological disorder (Kimerling, Ouimette, Cronkite, & Moos, 1999) and is now the 4th leading cause of disability across the lifespan and the 2nd leading cause of disability among people aged 15-44 (World Health Organization, 2005). According to a National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) the lifetime prevalence rate of MDD is 16% (Kessler et al., 2003). The prevalence of MDD is expected to rise such that by the year 2020, MDD will be second only to heart disease in terms of global burden of disease (World Health Organization, 2005). Although high, prevalence rates may be underestimated given that only about 70% of individuals with depression seek treatment (Angst, 1998). The effective treatment and prevention of MDD are of paramount importance and rank high among both mental health research and clinical objectives. A number of psychological interventions have been identified as holding at least partial efficacy towards this end. Among them are cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), cognitive therapy (CT), behavior therapy (BT), and interpersonal therapy (IT). Both and cognitive theories of depression are supported with substantial clinical and empirical evidence (Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979; Dobson, 1989; McLean, Ogston, & Grauer, 1973; Steinbrueck, Maxwell, & Howard, 1983), and distinct treatment modalities have emerged from each perspective. A conceptualization of depression first emerged in the 1970s, and suggested that depression is a result of a reduction in positively reinforcing behavior either via reduced availability of reinforcing alternatives, lack of skill to obtain reinforcing alternatives, or increased punishment (Lewinsohn, 1974). The treatment emanating from behavior theory is referred to as activation (BA). In BA, restoring an adequate schedule of reinforcement by having the patient increase activity levels is instrumental in decreasing depressive symptoms (Lewinsohn, Biglan, & Zeiss, 1976). BA has been reconceptualized since its original introduction. According to Martell and colleagues (Martell, Addis, & Jacobson, 2001), BA no longer aims to replenish a broad class of positive reinforcing activities but rather to replenish positive reinforcing activities that specifically move the patient toward personal goals while blocking avoidance patterns that prevent the patient from reaching those goals. The approach is both functional analytic and idiographic, in which contingencies that maintain behavior for each patient are identified via self-monitoring. Avoidance patterns are changed by integrating new behaviors into a daily routine, observing the outcome, and assessing whether the behavior serves to approach or avoid personal goals. …
Read full abstract