Prevention Of Depression In People Research Articles

A secondary analysis of three types of social support in relation to self-efficacy, disease impact, and depression in fibromyalgia

ObjectiveFibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain condition associated with depression. However, self-efficacy (belief in own ability to manage symptoms) and social support may be protective. This study tested three types of social support (emotional, tangible, and instrumental) for moderation of the mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between FM impact and depression over time. MethodsSix hundred participants with FM were randomly assigned to no intervention, social support group, or combined self-management and social support. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire, FM-modified Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression surveys were administered at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. There were no significant intervention effects on the variables of interest, however, participants' scores were used to assess four longitudinal models. ResultsSelf-efficacy showed mediation both between (b = 0.104, p < .001, 95% CI = [0.071, 0.137]) and within (b = 0.89, p < .001, 95% CI = [0.073, 0.106]) individuals. Only tangible support demonstrated moderation of the relationship between FM impact and self-efficacy, and only between individuals (b = 0.154, p = .022, 95% CI = [0.022, 0.287]). ConclusionThe results indicated that self-efficacy attenuated a portion of the effect of FM impact on depression over time. Additionally, higher levels of tangible support (the belief that your social network can provide you with assistance) were related to weaker influence of FM impact on self-efficacy over time. These factors may be important targets for the prevention of depression in people with FM.

Effectiveness of social support-based interventions in preventing depression in people without clinical depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The evidence available on the association between social support and prevention of depression has been basically obtained from observational studies. We evaluated the effectiveness of social support-based interventions for the prevention of depression in people without clinical depression. Systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) of randomized controlled trials (RCT), which were searched for in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, WOS, PsycINFO, OpenGrey and other sources from the inception dates to June 8, 2022. We selected RCTs that assessed the effectiveness of social support-based interventions as compared to controls, included subjects without baseline clinical depression, and measured as results a reduction in depressive symptoms and/or the incidence of new cases of depression. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated from random effects models. Nine RCTs involving 927 patients from North America, Asia and Europe were included. The pooled SMD was -0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.82 to -0.04; p = .031]. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of results. Heterogeneity was substantial [I2 = 80% (95% CI: 64% to 89%)]. A meta-regression model that included usual care as comparator and the continent (Europe), explained 53% of heterogeneity. Eight RCTs had a moderate overall risk of bias and one had a high risk of bias. Follow-up was ⩾1 year in only three RCTs. There was no statistical evidence of publication bias. The quality of evidence, as measured on GRADE guidelines, was low. Social support-based interventions had a small preventive effect on depression. Longer RCTs with a low risk of bias are necessary.