Prevention Of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema Research Articles

Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review of Different Surgical Approaches.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) affects approximately 20% of women after breast cancer therapy. Advances in treatment have increased the life expectancy; thus, the prevalence of BCRL will continue to rise with the number of cancer survivors, hence the need to develop strategies to prevent this condition. We provide a systematic review of the literature on the primary prevention of BCRL by prophylactic lymphatic surgery (PLS). Between June and August 2022, we conducted a search of PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane. In the end, a total of eighteen papers were selected. The eleven studies without a control group reported only 15 of 342 patients who developed lymphedema at least six months after PLS (4.59%). The seven studies with a control group included 569 patients, 328 cases and 241 controls. Among the cases, 36 (10%) developed lymphedema. In contrast, the incidence of lymphedema in the controls was 40% (98 of 241 patients). The formulation of definite recommendations in favor of PLS is hindered by low-quality studies. There is no consensus on which technique should be preferred, nor on whether adjuvant radiotherapy might affect the efficacy of PLS. Randomized controlled trials are mandatory to conceive evidence-based recommendations.

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: An Umbrella Review.

Identification of risk factors facilitates the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Several published systematic reviews have already addressed the risk factors for BCRL. This study aimed to systematically identify potential risk factors for BCRL and evaluate the quality of evidence. The study followed methodologic guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the Cochrane Handbook. The following electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to 15 November 2022: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, JBI Database, Cochrane Database, ProQuest, and PROSPERO. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodologic quality using AMSTAR2, risk of bias using ROBIS, and evidence quality using GRADE. The study evaluated overlap, assessed the small-study effect, and calculated the I2 statistic and Egger's P value as needed. The study included 14 publications comprising 10 meta-analyses and 4 systematic reviews. The authors identified 39 factors and 30 unique meta-analyses. In the study, 13 innate personal trait-related risk factors, such as higher body mass index (BMI) and axillary lymph nodes dissection, showed statistically significant associations with BCRL incidence. Breast reconstruction was found to be a protective factor. The methodologic quality was low or critically low. The majority of the systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses were rated as having a high risk of bias. Evidence quality was low for 22 associations and moderate for 8 associations. The currently identified risk factors for BCRL all are innate personal trait-related factors. Future well-designed studies and robust meta-analyses are needed to explore potential associations between behavioral-, interpersonal-, and environmental-related factors and BCRL, as well as the role of genetic variations and pathophysiologic factors.

The Effect of Education on Knowledge Regarding Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Risk Reduction and Prevention Among Nursing Personnel.

Aim The development of lymphedema post-breast-cancer surgery has been identified as a significant burden worldwide, with nurses at the forefront of prevention and risk reduction practices.Prevention is of crucial importance to avoid lymphedema formation and its complications.Thisstudy aims to assess the knowledge gained through an educational session regarding risk reduction and prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) among nursing professionals and compare the pre-test and post-test knowledge. Methods and material The research approach was quantitative in nature, and the design adopted was a pre-experimental, one-group pre-test post-test design.The study was conducted in a 400-bed multispecialty teaching hospital in Bangalore, Karnataka. After obtaining formal permission from the authorities, the participants were approached and informed about the purpose of the study.Eighty-four staff nurses working with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) patients participated in the study. The data for the study was collected using a validated questionnaire based on the National Lymphedema Network's (NLN) breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) risk reduction and preventive guidelines.The questionnaire consisted of two sections.Section A consisted of the staff nurses' demographic data, and Section B consisted of questions on risk reduction and prevention of lymphedema. The pre-test was conducted, followed by a structured teaching session on risk reduction and prevention of lymphedema among 84 staff nurses working with BCRL patients.After the teaching session, the post-test was conducted. Results Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis in this study.The t-test determined the statistical significance using the software SPSS (SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.). The result showed that the mean knowledge score was 4.286 with SD 0.97 in the pre-test, which increased to 4.452 with SD 1.511 with a significant p-value (<0.001). Conclusion According to the study's findings, nurses must get standardized lymphedema training in order to prevent lymphedema from developing in patients having breast cancer surgery.The study's outcome has implications on the focus areas for nurses in the context of the team's adoption and dissemination of breast cancer-related lymphedema preventive measures. Key messages of this study are - 1) BCRL is an irreversible, progressive complication with no cure if not diagnosed early. 2) Poor knowledge of lymphedema prevention among nurses leads to frustration for BCRL patients. 3) Risk reduction and prevention education enable the patient to reduce BCRL complications, minimize the severity of the condition, and improve the quality of life. 4) Pre-habilitation - patient education on early diagnosis and risk reduction/prevention of BCRL reduces the cost, time, and energy for the patient and health care delivery system.

Efficacy of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction in Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic condition that can negatively affect the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is emerging as a technique for the prevention of BCRL. This study compared the incidence of BRCL in patients who received ILR and those who were not amenable to ILR. Patients were identified through a prospectively maintained database between 2016 and 2021. Some patients were deemed nonamenable to ILR due to a lack of visualized lymphatics or anatomic variability (eg, spatial relationships or size discrepancies). Descriptive statistics, independent t test, and Pearson χ 2 test were used. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to assess the association between lymphedema and ILR. A loose age-matched subsample was created for subanalysis. Two hundred eighty-one patients were included in this study (252 patients who underwent ILR and 29 patients who did not). The patients had a mean age of 53 ± 12 years and body mass index of 28.6 ± 6.8 kg/m 2 . The incidence of developing lymphedema in patients with ILR was 4.8% compared with 24.1% in patients who underwent attempted ILR without lymphatic reconstruction ( P = 0.001). Patients who did not undergo ILR had significantly higher odds of developing lymphedema compared with those who had ILR (odds ratio, 10.7 [3.2-36.3], P < 0.001; matched OR, 14.2 [2.6-77.9], P < 0.001). Our study showed that ILR was associated with lower rates of BCRL. Further studies are needed to determine which factors place patients at highest risk of developing BCRL.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction for the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: an experience highlighting the importance of lymphatic anatomy

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has become increasingly utilized for the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). A growing body of evidence has demonstrated the long-term efficacy of ILR in reducing the rate of BCRL. While certain risk factors for BCRL are well-recognized, such as axillary lymph node dissection, regional lymph node radiation, and elevated body mass index, other potential risk factors such as age and taxane-based chemotherapeutics remain under discussion. Our experience with ILR has highlighted an additional potential risk factor for BCRL. Lymphatic anatomy, specifically compensatory lymphatic channels that bypass the axilla, may play a largely underrecognized role in determining which patients will develop BCRL after ILR. Foundational anatomic knowledge has primarily been based on cadaveric studies that predate the twentieth century. Modern approaches to lymphatic anatomical mapping using indocyanine green lymphography have helped to elucidate baseline lymphatic anatomy and compensatory channels, and certain variations within these channels may act as anatomic risk factors. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to highlight ways in which variations in lymphatic anatomy can inform the application and improve the accessibility of this procedure. As ILR continues to advance and evolve, anatomical mapping of the lymphatic system is valuable to both the patient and lymphatic microsurgeon and is a critical area of future study.

Multidisciplinary preventive intervention for breast cancer-related lymphedema: An international consensus.

To establish a consensus regarding the multidisciplinary prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), taking into account the expert opinion of professional groups from across the world involved in the identification and treatment of breast cancers. International consensus study involving a modified nominal group and Delphi process. A total of 50 preventive strategies representing those used by a range of health disciplines involved in breast cancer care were identified by the nominal group. These strategies were categorised into four subgroups (general recommendations, therapeutic approach, rehabilitation medicine and physiotherapy and dietary recommendations) and presented in survey format to a multidisciplinary panel of experts in a two-round Delphi process. Eleven specialist areas and 15 countries were represented on the panel. Twenty-seven experts responded to both Delphi rounds, and the mean overall agreement after Round 2 was 85.7%. Of the 50 proposed strategies for preventing BCRL, 48 yielded consensus among experts. We report an international consensus for the multidisciplinary prevention of BCRL, setting out recommendations aimed at systematising the care of women with breast cancer. The consensus could provide a platform for the development of standardised clinical guidelines.

Evaluation of Simplified Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (SLYMPHA) for the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection using bioimpedance spectroscopy

BackgroundLymphedema is a serious complication of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with an incidence rate of 20%. Simplified Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (SLYMPHA) is a safe and relatively simple method, which decreases incidence of lymphedema dramatically. Our initial study showed an 88% decrease in clinical lymphedema rate. In the initial study, we used arm circumference measurement for the diagnosis of lymphedema and median follow up was 15 months. The aim of this study was to confirm these results after a long-term follow up period and by using bioimpedance spectroscopy (L-Dex) technology in detecting lymphedema. Study designAll patients, undergoing ALND with or without SLYMPHA between January 2014 and November 2020 were included in the study. Patients with no postoperative L-Dex measurements were excluded. A L-Dex score outside the normal range (±10 L-Dex unit) or ≥10 L-Dex unit increase above patient's baseline was considered as lymphedema. The incidence of lymphedema was compared between patients with and without SLYMPHA. Results194 patients were included in the study. 57% of cohort underwent SLYMPHA. Mean follow-up time was 47 ± 37 months. Patients, who underwent SLYMPHA, had a significantly lower rate of lymphedema (16% vs 32%; p = 0.01; OR 0.4 [0.2–0.8]). ConclusionSLYMPHA is a safe and relatively simple method, which continued its efficacy after a long-term follow up period. It should be considered as an adjunct procedure to ALND for all patients during initial surgery.

Surgical Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Delayed Distal Lymphaticovenicular Anastomosis– An Alternative to the Classic LYMPHA Technique

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a devastating potential complication of axillary lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy. Several effective surgical treatment measures now exist, including lymphaticovenicular anastomosis (LVA), vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), and vascularized lymph vessel transplant (VLVT) for fluid-predominant disease, and liposuction and radical excision for solid-predominant disease. Super-microsurgical LVA is of particular interest, owing to its minimally invasive nature and highly favorable outcomes in the hands of experienced supermicrosurgeons. As LVA techniques are refined and improved, interest is rising in utilizing it to prevent the manifestation of disease in the first place. Lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA), also known as immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR), is the most widely used approach. It involves performing axillary LVA immediately following axillary lymphadenectomy. While preliminary results are favorable, the high-pressure proximal axillary venous branches used in ILR and the site’s vulnerability to damage from radiotherapy endanger the long-term patency of these anastomoses. Moreover, a theoretical oncologic concern exists regarding creating a direct conduit for the remaining malignant cells in the axilla into the circulation. Finally, coordinating ILR with axillary lymphadenectomy creates significant logistical challenges. Delayed, distally-based LVA (DD-LVA) has emerged as an alternative method that avoids these issues. This article presents an overview of the development of preemptive lymphatic reconstruction, and the senior author’s approach to the novel technique of DD-LVA.

Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using the Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach: A Case Report

Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a major complication of breast cancer surgery. The lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach, a surgical technique that can prevent breast cancer-related lymphedema, creates a lymphovenous bypass between the damaged axillary lymphatics during axillary lymph node dissection and the axillary vein. We report a case using the unilateral lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach in a patient with bilateral breast cancer. A 58-year-old woman diagnosed with bilateral invasive ductal carcinoma underwent a bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy. The lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach was performed on the left side after axillary lymph node dissection; the lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach was not performed after axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy on the right side. Six months after the surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center stage 2 lymphedema was observed in the lymphography images of the right arm, where the lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach had not been performed.

Simplified Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (SLYMPHA) for the Prevention of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema after Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Simplified Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (SLYMPHA) for the Prevention of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema after Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Six-Month Follow-up for Investigating the Effect of Prophylactic Lymphovenous Anastomosis on the Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Preliminary Study in a Single Institution

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the effect of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis on the prevention of arm lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer treatment.Methods: Among 69 women referred to undergo axillary lymph node dissection from January 2020 to June 2020, 21 were assigned to the treatment group and 48 to the control group. In the treatment group, 21 patients underwent prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis for the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema. The other 48 patients in the control group did not undergo any preventive surgical treatment. Prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis was performed at the same time as axillary lymph node dissection and breast cancer surgery. Postoperatively, all patients underwent circumferential measurements at 1, 3, and 6 months and lymphography at 6 months after the surgery. Results: None of the patients in the treatment group had lymphedema after the surgery (0%). In the control group, lymphedema occurred in nine patients (18.8%, p=0.049). No significant differences in the arm circumference were observed in the treatment group during follow-up (p&gt;0.05), whereas the arm circumference in the control group showed a significant increase at 1, 3, and 6 months after axillary lymph node dissection (p&lt;0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the arm circumference changes with respect to baseline at 1, 3, and 6 months after axillary lymph node dissection (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: Prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis represents a valid super microsurgical technique for the primary prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Simplified lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (SLYMPHA) for the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection.

e12581 Background: Lymphedema (LE) is a serious complication of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with an incidence rate of 16%. Simplified Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (SLYMPHA) is a safe and relatively simple method, which decreases incidence of LE dramatically. Our initial study showed an 88% decrease in clinical LE rate. In the initial study, we used arm circumference measurement for the diagnosis of LE and median follow up was 15 months. The aim of this study was to confirm these results after a long-term follow up period and by using bioimpedance spectroscopy (L-Dex) technology in detecting LE. Methods: All patients, undergoing ALND with or without SLYMPHA between January 2014 and November 2020 were included in the study. Patients with no postoperative L-Dex measurements were excluded. A L-Dex score outside the normal range (± 10 L-Dex unit) or &gt;10 L-Dex unit increase above patient’s baseline was considered as LE. The incidence of LE was compared between patients with and without SLYMPHA. Results: 194 patients were included in the study. 57% of cohort underwent SLYMPHA. Mean follow-up time was 47 ±37 months. Patients, who underwent SLYMPHA, had a significantly lower rate of LE (16% vs 32%; p=0.01; OR 0.4 [0.2-0.8]). Conclusions: SLYMPHA is a safe and relatively simple method, which continued its efficacy after a long-term follow up period. It should be considered as an adjunct procedure to ALND for all patients during initial surgery. [Table: see text]

Prevention of arm lymphedema through the use of compression sleeves following breast cancer: results from a targeted literature review

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is associated with impaired function and poorer quality of life. BCRL is also considered time-consuming and costly to treat. While compression treatment is considered the most efficient and effective form of treatment for early BCRL, its impact on the lymphatic system highlights its potential in the prevention of lymphedema.Objectives: To identify and summarise studies evaluating compression garment as a prevention strategy for BCRL.Methods: This is a targeted literature review of studies that evaluated use of compression garment in the prevention of BCRL, including prevention post-surgery and prevention of progression of subclinical lymphedema.Results: A total of 4 studies were identified that assessed the role of compression garment in the secondary (one randomized, controlled trial; n = 45) or tertiary (three cohort studies; sample size range: 111–508) prevention of BCRL. Together, findings from these studies suggest that use of compression garment was associated with reduced incidence, attenuation of lymphedema or prevention of progression to more severe lymphedema. However, the absence of a randomized, controlled trial in the tertiary setting means causal inferences relationship cannot be made.Conclusion: There is significant scope for further research, with consideration of possible benefits and costs associated with differences in compression class, duration or daily wear time, as well as comparison to other preventive strategies including patient preferences.

Effects of weight reduction on the breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundObesity has long been considered a risk factor for breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL), but the benefits of weight reduction in managing BCRL have not been clearly established. ObjectiveTo evaluate the beneficial effects of weight loss interventions (WLIs) on the reduction and prevention of BCRL. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases from their earliest record to October 1st, 2019. We included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials involving adult patients with a history of breast cancer, that compared WLI groups with no-WLI groups, and provided quantitative measurements of lymphedema. ResultsInitial literature search yielded 461 nonduplicate records. After exclusion based on title, abstract, and full-text review, four randomized controlled trials involving 460 participants were included for quantitative analysis. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant between-group mean difference (MD) regarding the volume of affected arm (MD = 244.7 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 145.3–344.0) and volume of unaffected arm (MD = 234.5 mL, 95% CI: 146.9–322.1). However, a nonsignificant between-group MD of −0.07% (95% CI: 1.22–1.08) was observed regarding the interlimb volume difference at the end of the WLIs. ConclusionsIn patients with BCRL, WLIs are associated with decreased volume of the affected and unaffected arms but not with decreased severity of BCRL measured by interlimb difference in arm volume.

The effectiveness of lymphedema self-management in the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema and quality of life: A randomized controlled trial.

The aim of our randomized controlled study is to determine the effect of lymphedema self-management in the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema and quality of life. Sixty-one breast cancer patients were included in the study. In the intervention group, patients were provided training and given a training booklet describing "exercise, massage and prevention methods" by the researchers, as part of the Self-Management of Lymphedema Program. Patients were followed by telephone for 6 months and through monthly clinical check-ups. Patients in the intervention and control groups were evaluated in both the pre-operative and post-operative periods (at one, three and six months) using the "DASH", "Measurement of Upper Extremity", " EORTC QLQ-30 and BR-23 questionnaire". The Mann Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis H test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Friedman test were used for the statistical analysis of the data. At the end of the study, while lymphedema development was not observed in the intervention group, 61.2% of the control patients developed lymphedema. The difference between the intervention and control groups for the development of lymphedema was found to be statistically significant (χ2 = 25,943; p = 0,000). The quality of life of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group. Moreover, the symptom scores of the intervention group were found to be significantly lower than those of the control group. As a result of our research, it can be concluded that the Self-Management of Lymphedema Program is effective at preventing lymphedema development following breast cancer treatment.

Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for Prevention of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema-a Preliminary Report.

Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)-a preliminary report BCRL-is a chronic debilitating condition which impairs quality of life of breast cancer survivors. The aim is to study the feasibility of preventing lymphedema by performing "Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach (LYMPHA)." Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery with complete nodal dissection were taken up for the study. After the standard axillary nodal dissection, lymphatics were identified by the help of blue dye and were anastomosed with a tributary to the axillary vein. Post-operatively, patients were followed up clinically for development of lymphedema and lymphoscintigraphy was performed after treatment completion. A total of 35 patients were enrolled for the study. The average BMI was 29.5. LYMPHA was feasible in all cases. The number of lymphatics identified was 1 to 5 per axilla. Two patients developed transient lymphedema which resolved with conservative therapy and patients were able to discontinue the compression garment. Follow-up lymphoscintigraphy is performed in two patients, which showed normal lymphatic flow. LYMPHA is a feasible technique, not difficult to perform, takes a short time, is accomplished in same general anesthesia as for axillary dissection, and gives no extra scar. The early results are promising and long-term follow-up may make the procedure as a routine.

The effectiveness of a clinical and home-based physical activity program and simple lymphatic drainage in the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective randomized controlled study.

To investigate the effectiveness of a clinical and home-based, nurse-led physical activity program (PAP) and simple lymphatic drainage (SLD) in the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema. A total of 52 breast cancer patients were randomized to either a PAP and SLD program (n=25) or a control group (n=27). Patients in both groups were also provided training for lymphedema. The PAP and SLD were administered through home visits by the investigators, twice a week for six weeks, in the intervention group. The control group did not undergo intervention. The circumference of the upper extremity, symptom severity, and physical function were measured in both groups. The upper extremity circumference increased by about two times from the baseline, in the control group, especially in the sixth week (p<0.05). Lymphedema-related symptom severity scores were found to decrease significantly in the intervention group, compared to those at the baseline (p<0.05). It was recommended that PAP and SLD, with a follow-up program, be used for patients who planned to undergo breast cancer surgery, starting from before surgery and continuing until after, to prevent breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Abstract OT3-07-01: A randomized trial evaluating bioimpedance spectroscopy vs. tape measurement in the prevention of lymphedema following breast cancer treatment

Abstract Background: Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) represents a common treatment associated complication following surgery, radiation and/or chemotherapy. Increasing data has demonstrated the ability of new diagnostic modalities to detect BCRL in the subclinical phase of the process allowing for early intervention. Trial Design: This 2-group stratified randomized clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) for early detection and prevention of BCRL compared to tape measurement (TM). Baseline assessments are made pre-operatively. Two-months post-op, patients are censored out if they have developed any of the exclusion conditions, did not have a mastectomy, axillary dissection, &amp;gt;6 sentinel nodes removed, radiation therapy, or taxane. Remaining patients are randomized within site to either BIS or TM; monitored at 3 to 6-month intervals up to 36-months post-op for a change over baseline specified to trigger a compression sleeve &amp; gauntlet intervention. Cohort trigger thresholds are change of ≥10 L-Dex units or 5 to &amp;lt;10% volume. If the intervention is triggered, measurements by the other method are taken before initiating the 4-week intervention. Post intervention, patients are monitored only with TM. Volume change of ≥10% results in study removal and physician referral. At the 2 study endpoints (36 month visit or volume change of ≥10%) measurements are taken with each method. Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion criteria: ≥ 18 with histologically confirmed stage I-III breast cancer (BC) or DCIS with planned surgery. Exclusion criteria include history of BC therapy or lymphedema. Specific Aims: The primary hypothesis is that subclinical detection of BCRL with BIS and early intervention will reduce the rate of lymphedema progression (as measured by referral to complex decongestive physiotherapy) compared to TM. Secondary outcomes include BCRL risk factors, quality of life, and time to treatment. Statistical Methods: Sample size and powering were based on the hypothesis that BIS would reduce progression rate by 20%. A rate of 50% progression in the TM group was used as the standard. 1100 patients will be enrolled to result in randomized groups of 100 (Total N=200) Statistics include relative risks with respective bootstrapped 95% C.I. and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests. Present Accrual and Target Accrual: Overall, the study target or expected enrollment as of the end of March 31, 2016 was 690 participants, 534 were actually enrolled (actual accrual 77% of target). Accrual at the study sites ranged from 15 to 104% of target. Contact Information: Sheila Ridner: 615-322-0831, Sheila.ridner@vanderbilt.edu Support: ImpediMed Limited, ImpediMed, Inc. and medi USA. Citation Format: Ridner S, Shah C, Dietrich M, Vicini F. A randomized trial evaluating bioimpedance spectroscopy vs. tape measurement in the prevention of lymphedema following breast cancer treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-07-01.

Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) for primary surgical prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: Over 4 years follow-up

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) represents an important morbidity that jeopardizes breast cancer patients' quality of life. Different attempts to prevent LE brought about improvements in the incidence of the pathology but LE still represents a frequent occurrence in breast cancer survivors. Over 4 years ago, Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) was proposed and long-term results are reported in this study. From July 2008 to December 2012, 74 patients underwent axillary nodal dissection for breast cancer treatment together with LYMPHA procedure. Volumetry was performed preoperatively in all patients and after 1, 3, 6, 12 months, and once a year. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 45 patients preoperatively and in 30 also postoperatively after at least over 1 year. Seventy one patients had no sign of LE, and volumetry was coincident to preoperative condition. In three patients, LE occurred after 8-12 months postoperatively. Lymphoscintigraphy showed the patency of lymphatic-venous anastomoses at 1-4 years after operation. LYMPHA technique represents a successful surgical procedure for primary prevention of arm LE in breast cancer patients.