Prevalence Of Arteriovenous Fistulas Research Articles

#1487 Preoperative ultrasound vascular mapping as a predictor of arteriovenous fistula survival: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background and Aims The morbidity and mortality of hemodialysis (HD) patients is directly related to the vascular access (VA) type. The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is considered the VA of choice. When compared to the use of catheter, the use of AVF encompasses a lower infectious complications rate and a higher survival rate. The use of catheter has been independently associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, especially during the first year of treatment. It is essential that HD programs maintain a high incidence and prevalence of AVF as a VA. For that reason, a multidisciplinary management is mandatory, with the collaboration of nephrologists, vascular surgeons, radiologists, and nurses. All patients who have an indication of AVF should have a prior ultrasound vascular mapping performed by the nephrologist to determine the most appropriate type of AVF. According to guidelines, there are several factors that increase the risk of AVF failure including advanced age, history of smoking, diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease, among others. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the benefits of performing a preoperative ultrasound vascular mapping in terms of AVF survival. The secondary objective is to associate some risk factors to a higher rate of AVF failure. Method We conducted a prospective cohort study between January 2020 and December 2023. The viability of AVF was compared between AVF resulting from a preoperative ultrasound vascular mapping and those AVF without previous mapping. A multivariate analysis was performed with the entire population to determine the factors related to AVF survival. Results This study analyzed a total of 136 AVF, both native and prosthetic. Our population included 106 patients, mostly men (69.79%), with a median age of 68 years old (IR: 56-76), and history of smoking in a 39.10%, of diabetes in a 42.43%, and of peripheral vascular disease in a 17.54%. A preoperative ultrasound vascular mapping was previously performed in 107 AVF (78.7%). A total of 93 AVF were functional (68.4%). Regarding the analyzed risk factors of AVF failure (including advanced age and history of smoking, diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease, and elbow/wrist AVF), we observed that advanced age and elbow AVF were related to higher survival of the AVF (p = 0.048 and p = 0.01 respectively). In the multivariate analysis we observed that advanced age and elbow AVF were independent predictors of AVF survival (p = 0.038 and p = 0.001, respectively). When comparing the cohorts, in the AVFs were the preoperative vascular ultrasound was performed, 78 AVF were functional (72.9%). In the AVFs were no mapping was performed, 15 AVF were functional (51.7%). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.03). This implies a 21.2% increase in the probability of AVF survival when performing our AVF mapping. Conclusions The performance of a preoperative ultrasound vascular mapping by the nephrologist in our population has been associated to a significant increase in AVF survival. For that reason, we consider that it is an indispensable tool for the creation and monitoring of VA. When analyzing risk factors classically associated to AVF failure, we found that advanced age and elbow AVF were independent predictors of higher AVF survival. Other risk factors, such as history of diabetes mellitus, smoking, and peripheral arterial disease, were not significantly related to AVF failure in our population.

Vascular access for hemodialysis in Italy: What a national survey reveals.

Since in Italy there are no official data on vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis the Vascular Access Project Group (VAPG) of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN) designed a national survey. A 35-question survey was designed and sent it to the Italian facilities through the SIN website. The basic questions were the prevalence, the location, and the surveillance of VA, the bedside use of ultrasound, the use of fluoroscopy for central venous catheter (CVC) placement, and of buttonhole technique, the role of nephrologist in the access creation. The questionnaire was completed in June 2022 by 161 facilities. The survey registered 15,499 patients, approximately one-third of the Italian dialysis population. The prevalence of arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous Graft (AVG), and CVC were 61.8%, 3.7%, and 34.5% respectively. The AVF location was 50% in distal forearm, 20% in meanproximal forearm, 30% in upper arm. For AVF creation, nephrologists were involved in 72% of facilities while for CVC placement in 62%. As regards VA monitoring, 21% of the facilities did not have a surveillance protocol; 60% did not register AVF thrombosis and 53% did not register CVC infections. Most of facilities use the fluoroscope during CVC placement, 37% when needed, and 22% never. Ultrasound-guided puncture of complex AVFs was used by 80% of facilities. Buttonhole puncture was used in 5% of patients. Some considerations emerge from the survey data: (1) The increasing CVC prevalence compared to DOPPS 5 study. (2) The low rate of AVG prevalence. (3) The nephrologist is the operator in many VA procedures. (4) The fluoroscopy for CVC placement and the US-guide puncture of the complex AVF are widely used in most facilities. (5) The practice of the buttonhole is not widespread. (6) When the operator is the nephrologist more distal fistulas are performed.

Effect of far infrared therapy on arteriovenous fistula maturation, survival and stenosis in hemodialysis patients, a randomized, controlled clinical trial: the FAITH on fistula trial

BackgroundAn arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis treatment. After creation many of the AVFs will never mature or if functioning will need an intervention within 1 year due to an AVF stenosis. Studies investigating possible therapies that improves the AVF maturation and survival are scarce. Far infrared therapy (FIR) has shown promising results. In minor single centre and industry supported trials FIR has shown improved AVF maturation and survival. There is a need of a randomized multicentre controlled trial to examine the effect of FIR on the AVF maturation and survival and to explore the possible AVF protective mechanism induced by the FIR treatment.MethodsThis investigator initiated, randomized, controlled, open-labeled, multicenter clinical trial will examine the effect of FIR on AVF maturation in patients with a newly created AVF (incident) and AVF patency rate after 1 year of treatment in patients with an existing AVF (prevalent) compared to a control group. The intervention group will receive FIR to the skin above their AVF three times a week for 1 year. The control group will be observed without any treatment. The primary outcome for incident AVFs is the time from surgically creation of the AVF to successful cannulation. The primary outcome for the prevalent AVFs is the difference in number of AVFs without intervention and still functioning in the treatment and control group after 12 months. Furthermore, the acute changes in inflammatory and vasodilating factors during FIR will be explored. Arterial stiffness as a marker of long term AVF patency will also be examined.DiscussionFIR is a promising new treatment modality that may potentially lead to improved AVF maturation and survival. This randomized controlled open-labelled trial will investigate the effect of FIR and its possible mechanisms.Trial registrationClinicaltrialsgov NCT04011072 (7th of July 2019).

Vascular Access Use Among Hemodialysis Patients and Competency of Nurses at National Kidney Centre, Nepal

Introduction: Vascular access are a prerequisite for hemodialysis and good care by nurses is key to their longevity. A pattern of vascular access use has not been assessed previously nor the competency of nurses to identify the gaps in knowledge and skills. This study aims to describe vascular access use and nursing competency at National Kidney Centre. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was done to obtain demographic information and history of vascular access of patients. Vascular access was examined. Demographic and professional information of nurses were collected. A quiz based on KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and a visual analogue scale to indicate confidence in managing vascular access were administered to the nurses. Results: Four-hundred seventy-two patients and 70 nurses were recruited. The proportion of patients with an arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, tunneled catheter, and non-tunneled catheter at the time of initiation of hemodialysis were 24.36%, 0.64%, 1.27%, and 73.73%, respectively, and after conversion was 67.23%, 5.08%, 1.98%, and 19.77%, respectively. The cost at initiation was lower for catheters and the arteriovenous access in long run. Nurses had received vascular access training during their hemodialysis course (95.71%), but a few received further training (38.57%). They did well in sections related to preparation for permanent access and treatment of complications. Conclusions: Most of the patients initiated hemodialysis via a non-tunneled catheter. The prevalence of arteriovenous fistula was high. Continued training of nurses was lacking. Nurses were confident in managing arteriovenous fistula and non-tunneled catheters.

Intra-access Pressure: Do We Really Need to Know? A Critical Review


 Arteriovenous (AV) fistula and AV graft are considered superior to venous catheter access, remarkable success has been achieved in increasing prevalence of AV fistula. However, vascular access complications are common and result in increased hospitalization, mortality and expense. Guidelines suggest various methods to maintain patency of vascular access. Amongst these various methods used for vascular access monitoring and surveillance, intra-access pressure (PIA) is a simple tool which can be helpful in early detection and management of stenosis in vascular access. Intra-access pressure, although a very simple and quick method of vascular access evaluation, has a low diagnostic accuracy in prediction of vascular access stenosis as compared to other methods of access surveillance. We discuss here the physiology, methodology and the utility of intra-access pressure.

Gender-Based Utilization and Outcomes of Autogenous Fistulas and Prosthetic Grafts for Hemodialysis Access

To evaluate gender-based patterns of utilization and outcomes of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs) in a population-based cohort of hemodialysis (HD) patients. A retrospective analysis of all patients in the United States Renal Data System who had an AVF or AVG placed for HD access (January 2007 to December 2014). Outcomes were access maturation, conduit patency, infection, and mortality. Chi-square, Student's t, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable Cox regression analyses were employed accordingly. There were 456,693 (57%) males and 341,571 (43%) females who initiated HD via AVF (16%), AVG (4%) and HD catheter (80%). There was a 30% decrease in odds of initiating HD with AVF in females compared with males (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.71, P<0.001). The use of HD catheter as a bridge to AVF was 36% higher in females compared with males (aOR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.33-1.39, P<0.001). Preemptive AVF maturation was 78% for males and 76% for females (P<0.001). The risk-adjusted analyses showed a 7% decrease in AVF maturation comparing females with males (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, P<0.001) but no difference in AVG maturation (aHR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97-1.01, P=0.46) After risk adjustment, primary (AVF: aHR-0.87; AVG: aHR-0.96), primary-assisted (AVF: aHR-0.84; AVG: aHR-0.97), and secondary (AVF: aHR-0.85; AVG: aHR-0.98) patency were lower for females compared with males (all P<0.05). Initiation of HD with a catheter and conversion to AVF was associated with lower patency in males (aHR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.28-0.29; P<0.001) and females (aHR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.30-0.31; P<0.001) compared with AVF initiates. Patient survival was higher for females compared with males who received AVF (aHR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.07-1.09; P<0.001) and AVG (aHR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.11-1.15; P<0.001). Initiation with HD catheter and subsequent conversion to AVF was associated with an increase in mortality for males (aHR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.43-1.47; P<0.001) and females (aHR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.44-1.52; P<0.001) compared with initiation via AVF. There was no significant difference in severe AVG infection comparing females with males (aHR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.98-1.13; P=0.16). Female gender is associated with a lower prevalence of preemptive AVF's, higher utilization of catheters as a bridge to AVF, and lower patency compared with males. There was no difference in access maturation but patient survival was higher for females compared with males.

Clinic of vascular access: Results after implementing a multidisciplinary approach adding routine Doppler ultrasound

BackgroundA multidisciplinary approach and Doppler ultrasound (DU) assessment for the creation and maintenance of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for haemodialysis can improve prevalence and patency. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of a new multidisciplinary vascular access (VA) clinic with routine DU. Material and methodsWe analyzed the VA clinic results from 2014 and 2015, before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol (vascular surgeon/nephrologist) with routine DU in preoperative mapping and prevalent AVF. ResultsWe analyzed 345 and 364 patients from 2014 and 2015 respectively. The number of surgical interventions was similar in both periods (p=.289), with a trend toward an increase in preventive surgical repair of AVF in 2015 (17 vs. 29, p=.098). 155 vs. 169 new AVF were performed in 2014 and 2015, with a significantly lower primary failure rate in 2015 (26.4 vs. 15.3%, p=.015), and a non-significant increase in radiocephalic AVF, 25.8 vs. 33.2% (n=40 vs. 56), p=.159. The concordance between the indication at the clinic and the surgery performed also increased (81.3 vs. 93.5%, p=.001). Throughout 2015 fewer complementary imaging test were requested from the clinic (78 vs. 35, p<.001), with a corresponding reduction in costs (€ 87,716 vs. € 59,445). ConclusionsMultidisciplinary approach with routine DU can improve VA results, with a decrease in primary failure rate, higher likelihood of radiocephalic AVF, better management of dis-functioning AVF and lower radiological test costs.

Consulta de acceso vascular: resultados antes y después de la instauración de un programa multidisciplinar con realización de ecografía doppler de rutina

BackgroundA multidisciplinary approach and Doppler ultrasound (DU) assessment for the creation and maintenance of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for haemodialysis can improve prevalence and patency. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of a new multidisciplinary vascular access (VA) clinic with routine DU. Material and methodsWe analysed the VA clinic results from 2014 and 2015, before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol (vascular surgeon/nephrologist) with routine DU in preoperative mapping and prevalent AVF. ResultsWe analysed 345 and 364 patients from 2014 and 2015 respectively. The number of surgical interventions was similar in both periods (p=.289), with a trend towards an increase in preventive surgical repair of AVF in 2015 (17 vs. 29, p=.098). 155 vs. 169 new AVF were performed in 2014 and 2015, with a significantly lower primary failure rate in 2015 (26.4 vs. 15.3%, p=.015), and a non-significant increase in radiocephalic AVF, 25.8 vs. 33.2% (n=40 vs. 56), p=.159. The concordance between the indication at the clinic and the surgery performed also increased (81.3 vs. 93.5%, p=.001). Throughout 2015 fewer complementary imaging test were requested from the clinic (78 vs. 35, p <.001), with a corresponding reduction in costs (€87,716 vs. €59,445). ConclusionsMultidisciplinary approach with routine DU can improve VA results, with a decrease in primary failure rate, higher likelihood of radiocephalic AVF, better management of dis-functioning AVF and lower radiological test costs.

Successful multidisciplinary interventions for arterio-venous fistula creation by the Pacific Northwest Renal Network 16 vascular access quality improvement program

In December 2001, 44.2% of hemodialysis (HD) patients in the Northwest Renal Network (NWRN 16) received dialysis using an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Substantial differences were noted in percentages of patients with AVF, ranging from 5% to 90% of the facility population, suggesting wide variation in physician practice patterns within the Network. To address the needs of facilities having < 40% AVF, NWRN 16 provided education and tools for their vascular access decision-makers to promote AVF creation. In 2002, the Network sponsored 4 regional workshops targeted to nephrologists, vascular surgeons, dialysis nurses, and interventional radiologists. 46 facilities (43% of all Network facilities) had <40% AVF in use in December, 2001, dialyzing 2940 patients (Invited Units). Percent AVF in use in all the Invited Facilities increased from 31.3% pre-intervention to 39.8% at 1 year (p<0.001 vs pre) to 56.2% at four years: 79.8% increase in the prevalent AVF rate over a four-year period (95% confidence interval: 77.8% to 81.7%). Low prevalent AVF rates in many NWRN 16 facilities may have resulted from differences in physician practice patterns. The success of Network 16 AVF Intervention demonstrates the effectiveness of Network education promoting multidisciplinary teamwork, innovative strategies to increase AVF rates among dialysis patients.

Fistula First Initiative: Historical Impact on Vascular Access Practice Patterns and Influence on Future Vascular Access Care.

The vascular access is the lifeline for the hemodialysis patient. In the United States, the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative (FFBI) has been influential in improving use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Currently, prevalent AVF rates are near the goal of 66% set forth by the original FFBI. However, central venous catheter (CVC) rates remain very high in the United States in patients initiating hemodialysis, nearly exceeding 80%. A new direction of the of the FFBI has focused on strategies to reduce CVC use, and subsequently the FFBI has now been renamed the "Fistula First-Catheter Last Initiative". However, an AVF may not be the best vascular access in all hemodialysis patients, and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and CVCs may be appropriate and the best access for a subset of hemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, there still remains very little emphasis within vascular access initiatives and guidelines directed towards evaluation of the individual patient context, specifically patients with poor long-term prognoses and short life expectancies, patients with multiple comorbidities, patients who are more likely to die than reach end stage renal disease (ESRD), and patients of elderly age with impaired physical and cognitive function. Given the complexity of medical and social issues in advanced CKD and ESRD patients, planning, selection, and placement of the most appropriate vascular access are ideally managed within a multidisciplinary setting and requires consideration of several factors including national vascular access guidelines. Thus, the evolution of the FFBI should underscore the need for multidisciplinary health teams with a major emphasis placed on "the right access for the right patient" and improving the patient's overall quality of life.

Adding access blood flow surveillance reduces thrombosis and improves arteriovenous fistula patency: a randomized controlled trial.

Stenosis is the main cause of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure. It is still unclear whether surveillance based on vascular access blood flow (QA) enhances AVF function and longevity. We conducted a three-year follow-up randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label trial to compare QA-based surveillance and pre-emptive repair of subclinical stenosis with standard monitoring/surveillance techniques in prevalent mature AVFs. AVFs were randomized to either the control group (surveillance based on classic alarm criteria; n = 104) or to the QA group (QA measured quarterly using Doppler ultrasound [M-Turbo®] and ultrasound dilution [Transonic®] added to classic surveillance; n = 103).The criteria for intervention in the QA group were: 25% reduction in QA, QA<500 mL/min or significant stenosis with hemodynamic repercussion (peak systolic velocity [PSV] more than 400 cm/sc or PSV pre-stenosis/stenosis higher than 3). At the end of follow-up we observed a significant reduction in the thrombosis rate in the QA group (0.025 thrombosis/patient/year in the QA group vs. 0.086 thrombosis/patient/year in the control group [p = 0.007]). There was a significant improvement in the thrombosis-free patency rate (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.82; p = 0.011) and in the secondary patency rate in the QA group (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.93; p = 0.030), with no differences in the primary patency rate between the groups (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.57-1.61; p = 0.935).There was greater need for a central venous catheter and more hospitalizations associated with vascular access in the control group (p = 0.034/p = 0.029).Total vascular access-related costs were higher in the control group (€227.194 vs. €133.807; p = 0.029). QA-based surveillance combining Doppler ultrasound and ultrasound dilution reduces the frequency of thrombosis, is cost effective, and improves thrombosis free and secondary patency in autologous AVF.

Vascular access types in patients starting hemodialysis after failed kidney transplant: does close nephrology follow-up matter?

Native arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are preferred while central venous catheters (CVCs) are least suitable vascular access (VA) in patients requiring hemodialysis (HD). Unfortunately, around 80% of patients start HD with CVCs. Late referral to nephrologist is thought to be a factor responsible for this. We retrospectively analyzed the types of VA at HD initiation in renal transplant recipients followed by nephrologists with failed transplant. If early referral to nephrologist improves AVF use, these patients should have higher prevalence of AVF at HD initiation. All patients who failed their kidney transplants from January 2002 to April 2013 were included in the study. Data regarding planning of VA by nephrologist, documented discussion about renal replacement therapy (RRT), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 months and last clinic visit before HD initiation, time of VA referral, and subsequent VA at dialysis initiation were gathered and analyzed. Eighty-three patients failed their transplants during study period. Data were inaccessible in six patients. Eleven patients started peritoneal dialysis (PD) while 66 started HD. Thirty-two had previous functioning VA while 34 needed VA. There were 11/34 patients (32%) with eGFR &lt;15 mL/min at six months while 21/34 (61%) had eGFR &lt;15 mL/min at last clinic visit before HD initiation. Only 11/34 (32%) had documented RRT discussion, 8/34 (24%) had VA referral, and 7/34 (21%) had vein mapping. A total of 30/34 (88.3%) started HD with CVC while 4/34 (11.3%) started HD with AVF (p&lt;0.0001). Early referral to nephrologist by itself may not improve VA care amongst patient with end-stage renal disease.

Association of Genetic Polymorphisms of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System-Related Genes with Arterio-Venous Fistula Malfunction in Hemodialysis Patients.

Hemodialysis (HD) is the most commonly-used renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease worldwide. Arterio-venous fistula (AVF) is the vascular access of choice for HD patients with lowest risk of infection and thrombosis. In addition to environmental factors, genetic factors may also contribute to malfunction of AVF. Previous studies have demonstrated the effect of genotype polymorphisms of angiotensin converting enzyme on vascular access malfunction. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study to evaluate the association between genetic polymorphisms of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and AVF malfunction. Totally, 577 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 60 years old and 53% were male. HD patients with AVF malfunction had longer duration of HD (92.5 ± 68.1 vs. 61.2 ± 51.9 months, p < 0.001), lower prevalence of hypertension (44.8% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.025), right-sided (31.8% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.002) and upper arm AVF (26.6% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), and higher mean dynamic venous pressure (DVP) (147.8 ± 28.3 vs. 139.8 ± 30.0, p = 0.021). In subgroup analysis of different genders, location of AVF and DVP remained significant clinical risk factors of AVF malfunction in univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression in female HD patients. Among male HD patients, univariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that right-side AVF and upper arm location are two important clinical risk factors. In addition, two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs275653 (Odds ratio 1.90, p = 0.038) and rs1492099 (Odds ratio 2.29, p = 0.017) of angiotensin II receptor 1 (AGTR1), were associated with increased risk of AVF malfunction. After adjustment for age and other clinical factors, minor allele-containing genotype polymorphisms (AA and CA) of rs1492099 still remained to be a significant risk factor of AVF malfunction (Odds ratio 3.63, p = 0.005). In conclusion, we demonstrated that rs1492099, a SNP of AGTR1 gene, could be a potential genetic risk factor of AVF malfunction in male HD patients.

Vascular access and infection prevention and control: a national survey of routine practices in Irish haemodialysis units

BackgroundNational and international guidelines recommend the use of effective vascular access (VA) and infection prevention and control practices within the haemodialysis environment. Establishing an arterio-venous fistula (AVF) and preventing central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections are ongoing challenges for all dialysis settings. We surveyed VA and routine infection prevention and control practices in dialysis units, to provide national data on these practices in Ireland.MethodsA descriptive survey was emailed to nurse managers at all adult (n = 19) and children (n = 1) outpatient haemodialysis units in the Republic of Ireland. Data collected included AVF formation, CVC insertion and maintenance practices, VA use and surveillance of infection and screening protocols. Nineteen of the 20 units responded to the survey.ResultsThe AVF prevalence was 49% for 1370 patients in 17 units who provided these data [mean prevalence per unit: 45.7% (SD 16.2)]; the CVC mean prevalence per unit was 52.5% (SD 16.0). Fourteen dialysis units experienced inadequate access to vascular surgical procedures either due to a lack of dedicated theatre time or hospital beds. Six units administered intravenous prophylactic antimicrobials prior to CVC insertion with only two units using a CVC insertion checklist at the time of catheter insertion.ConclusionIn general, dialysis units in Ireland show a strong adherence to national guidelines. Compared with the 12 countries participating in the Dialysis Outcomes Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS 4), in 2010, AVF prevalence in Irish dialysis units is the second lowest. Recommendations include establishing an AVF national prevalence target rate, discontinuing the administration of intravenous prophylactic antimicrobials prior to CVC insertion and promoting the use of CVC insertion checklists.

Quality-of-Care Indicators Among Remote-Dwelling Hemodialysis Patients: A Cohort Study

We hypothesized that the higher mortality for hemodialysis patients who live farther from the closest attending nephrologist compared with patients living closer might be due to lower quality of care. Population-based longitudinal study. All adult maintenance hemodialysis patients with measurements of quality-of-care indicators initiating hemodialysis therapy between January 2001 and June 2010 in Northern Alberta, Canada. Hemodialysis patients were classified into categories based on the distance by road from their residence to the closest nephrologist: ≤50 (referent), 50.1-150, 150.1-300, and >300 km. Quality-of-care indicators were based on published guidelines. Quality-of-care indicators at 90 days following initiation of hemodialysis therapy and, in a secondary analysis, at 1 year. Measurements were available for 1,784 patients. At baseline, the proportions of patients residing in each category were 69% for ≤50 km to closest nephrologist; 17%, 50.1-150 km; 7%, 150.1-300 km; and 7%, >300 km. Those who lived farther away from the closest nephrologist were less likely to have seen a nephrologist 90 days prior to the initiation of hemodialysis therapy (P for trend = 0.008) and were less likely to receive Kt/V of 1.2 (adjusted OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.84; P for trend = 0.01). Remote location also was associated with suboptimal levels of phosphate control (P for trend = 0.005). There were no differences in the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas or grafts or hemoglobin levels across distance categories. Registry data with limited data for non-guideline-based quality indicators. Although several quality-of-care indicators were less common in remote-dwelling hemodialysis patients, these differences do not appear sufficient to explain the previously noted disparities in clinical outcomes by residence location.

Systemic Barriers to Optimal Hemodialysis Access

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are considered the gold standard for hemodialysis vascular access based on their superior patency, low complication rates, improved adequacy, lower costs to the health care system, and decreased risk of patient mortality. The goals of the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative are to achieve a prevalent AVF use rate of at least 66% nationally, to decrease central venous catheter use, and to reduce overall vascular access complication rates among patients on hemodialysis. Achieving optimal vascular access is a complex process and, unlike other dialysis outcomes, requires patient involvement as well as collaboration among nephrologists, surgeons, interventionalists, dialysis facilities, primary care physicians, and hospital systems. In 2009, the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative assembled a team from varied backgrounds and perspectives to discover the systemic root causes as to why the AVF use rate in the United States is significantly lower than that in other industrialized countries. Ultimately, the 139 latent root causes identified by the root cause analysis team fall into the categories of patient, physician, and system. This article summarizes the current controversies in regard to improving AVF placement and reducing central venous catheter use, related to each of these three categories.

Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative: Targeting Catheter Last in Fistula First

An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the optimal vascular access for hemodialysis (HD), because it is associated with prolonged survival, fewer infections, lower hospitalization rates, and reduced costs. The AVF First breakthrough initiative (FFBI) has made dramatic progress, effectively promoting the increase in the national AVF prevalence since the program's inception from 32% in May 2003 to nearly 60% in 2011. Central venous catheter (CVC) use has stabilized and recently decreased slightly for prevalent patients (treated more than 90 days), while CVC usage in the first 90 days remains unacceptably high at nearly 80%. This high prevalence of CVC utilization suggests important specific improvement goals for FFBI. In addition to the current 66% AVF goal, the initiative should include specific CVC usage target(s), based on the KDOQI goal of less than 10% in patients undergoing HD for more than 90 days, and a substantially improved initial target from the current CVC proportion. These specific CVC targets would be disseminated through the ESRD networks to individual dialysis facilities, further emphasizing CVC avoidance in the transition from advanced CKD to chronic kidney failure, while continuing to decrease CVC by prompt conversion of CVC-based hemodialysis patients to permanent vascular access, utilizing an AVF whenever feasible.

Prevalence of Arteriovenous Fistulas in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: Correlation With Patient Factors That May Be Associated With Maturation Failure

Lok et al previously reported a risk equation for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure. It is unclear whether this model or a more comprehensive model correlates with incident AVF use in the US hemodialysis population. Cross-sectional study. 195,756 adult patients initiating outpatient hemodialysis therapy in the United States between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, with 6 months or more prior nephrology care. Patient characteristics (age, peripheral vascular disease, coronary artery disease, and race) populating the AVF maturation failure risk equation and other demographic and clinical variables from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medical Evidence Report (CMS 2728). AVF use at first outpatient dialysis treatment as recorded on the CMS 2728. Using the risk categories defined by Lok et al, AVF use varied from 19.0% (very high risk) to 25.6% (low risk). In a model using only these risk categories, logistic regression showed lower ORs for moderate-, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93); high-, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83); and very high-risk patients, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63-0.73) compared with low risk. In the expanded model, odds were lower for women, blacks, Hispanics, age older than 85 years, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, other cardiac disease, and underweight. Odds were higher for hypertension, overweight, obesity, 12 months or more nephrologist care, most insurance types, and each successive year after 2005. Despite associations, the C statistic for the expanded model was 0.64. This analysis is limited by lack of access creation history before dialysis therapy initiation and minimal external validation of CMS 2728 data. Clinical risk factors identified by Lok and expanded in this analysis have limited ability to predict incident AVF use. Even patients judged at highest risk can have successful AVF construction and initiate dialysis therapy through a functioning AVF.

Achieving the goal

This review summarizes the background and implementation of the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative (FFBI), published information about changes in vascular access practice since its inception, and several issues raised by the program. The FFBI is a surveillance system using the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Networks to spread improvement ideas. Concomitant with implementation of the program, prevalent arteriovenous fistula use has increased an average of 3.3% annually since 2003, an incremental improvement of 1.3% over the preexisting trend. At the same time, long-term central venous catheter (CVC) use declined among the prevalent population. Increasingly, individual facilities are achieving the FFBI goal of 66% prevalent arteriovenous fistula use; however, results vary across geographic regions and are not explained by patient demographic and clinical characteristics alone. ESRD Network interventions as a function of the FFBI are associated with increasing arteriovenous fistula use and likely contributed to improvement, but improvement cannot be unequivocally attributed to the Networks due to lack of rigorous research design. Questions and opportunities remain. It is not yet clear how to identify patients who may not be appropriate candidates for an arteriovenous fistula. The ultimate impact of the FFBI on patient mortality is yet to be determined. The FFBI must continue to identify variations in use and the contributing causes, and implement strategies to address these causes if the FFBI goal is to be fully achieved.

A Vascular Access Coordinator Improves the Prevalent Fistula Rate

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services set the prevalent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) rate of 66% as a national standard. To test the hypothesis that the use of a clinical vascular access coordinator could increase the rate of AVF in a large Nephrology group practice, we implemented an aggressive, multidisciplinary vascular access improvement program led by a trained vascular access coordinator (VAC). In early 2009, we established protocols, approved by all physicians, for the care of vascular access and implemented by a nurse VAC. We retrospectively reviewed Network vascular access data reports from January 2008 through December 2010. The data show that after the implementation of a comprehensive access program led by a VAC, the prevalent AVF rate increased from 50% to 65%. The number of grafts decreased while the percentage of dialysis catheters used for more than 90 days was cut in half. These data suggest that despite an unchanged catheter rate at dialysis initiation, the use of a VAC implementing an aggressive, multidisciplinary access program can significantly increase the AVF rate while decreasing grafts and prevalent catheter use.