Prevalence Of Second Canal Research Articles

Diagnostic Accuracy of CBCT for Detection of Second Canal of Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction Missed canal is one of the common reasons for nonsurgical endodontic retreatments. The missed canals were frequently associated with periapical pathology. The aim of this systematic review was to find the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for detection of the second canal of the root canal system of permanent teeth. Materials and Methods The articles were selected from seven electronic databases according to selection criteria. All eligible studies were judged by the reviewers. The selected studies were checked with the QUADAS-2 tool for risk of bias and applicability concerns. Finally, 12 studies were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The summary estimates of sensitivities and specificities and SROC curves were calculated and drawn by RevMan 5.3 and MetaDTA software. Results Summary estimates of CBCT for detection of second canal anatomy in permanent teeth were 94% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity. 96.6% sensitivity of MB2 was followed by 88.8% sensitivity of maxillary and mandibular premolars and 81% that of mandibular molars. The specificity of 97.6% for premolars was trialed by 85% specificity of mandibular molars and MB2. For permanent mandibular canines, 67% sensitivity and 100% specificity were estimated. CBCT showed more agreement with detecting the second canal with micro-CT, estimating 100% sensitivity and 95.6% specificity. The highest prevalence of the second canal comprised the highest sensitivity of 99.1% and lowest specificity of 77.5%. After the exclusion of case-control studies, a 3% drop of sensitivity from the summary estimate was observed. Multiple spectrum of the second canal had 8.6% higher sensitivity and 4.4% lower specificity than single spectrum. Conclusion CBCT is informative for detecting the second canal. Clinicians should keep in mind that the accuracy can vary in different types of teeth, with the prevalence of second canal across different populations, and with the spectrum of second canal anatomy in spite of the reviewers having postulated overestimation of the findings.

Assessment of root canal anatomy of mandibular incisors using cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish subpopulation

Aim: The achievement of root canal treatment is influenced by the status of the root canals. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of second root canals in mandibular incisors and the prevalence of root canal separation in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of cases with 2 root canals.
 Methodology: Retrospective cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) datas of 500 patients seen between 2016 and 2018 were evaluated. A total of 300 patients, 134 males and 166 females, aged 13-71 years (mean age 39.34±13.44) were included in this study. A total of 587 central mandibular incisors and 582 lateral mandibular incisors were examined. The number of roots and root canal morphology based on the Vertucci’s classification were analyzed. The effect of gender on the prevalence of root canal anatomy was also evaluated.
 Results: The occurence of more than 1 root canal in mandibular lateral and mandibular central was 41.2% and 40.4% respectively and all teeth had a single root. Type I (59.2%) was the most common type, followed by Type III (31.4%), Type II (5.8%), Type VII (2.1 %), Type VI (0.8%) and Type V (0.7%). Type IV and Type VIII were not observed. The root canal separation in two root canaI of central and lateral mandibular incisors was found in the middle third of the root in 65.4% and 74.6%, respectively. The incidence of Type III in males (39%) was higher than that of females (25.4%), while the incidences of Type I in females (67.7%) were significantly higher than that of males (48.3%). The prevalence of second canals in mandibular incisors were detected more frequently in men than in women.
 Conclusion: The prevalence of second canal in total mandibular incisors is 40.8% (Type III was observed the most frequently). CBCT is an appropriate method for identifying of canal morphologies of mandibular incisors.
 How to cite this article: Çoban Kanyılmaz AN, Okumuş Ö, Sunay H. Assessment of root canal anatomy of mandibular incisors using cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish subpopulation. Int Dent Res 2021;11(1):46-53. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no1.8
 
 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Prevalence of second canal in the mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary molars from a Turkish subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study

Permanent maxillary molar teeth have the most complex root and canal systems. This study aimed to determine the frequency and the localisation of secondary mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in the mesiobuccal roots of permanent maxillary molars in a Turkish subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compare them by different age groups and gender. In this retrospective study, a total of 800 maxillary molar teeth in 200 subjects were investigated. The distances between canals were calculated from the centre point of the MB2 canal (PMB2) to the centre point of the mesiobuccal canal (PMB1) and the centre point of the palatal canal (PP). The incidence of MB2 canals was found to be 33.5% (23.2% in females, 43.6% in males) in 200 subjects. A significant difference was found between age groups and genders in terms of the frequency of MB2 (p < 0.05). The distances between PMB1- -PMB2 were 2.95 ± 0.58 mm, 3.08 ± 0.67 mm for 1MM and 2MM, respectively. For 1MM and 2MM, the averages of PMB2-PP distances were 5.81 ± 1.09 mm and 5.55 ± 1.09 mm, respectively. The contralateral formation of the MB2 canals was 90.5% (16, 26) in the first molars and 93.9% in the second molars (17, 27). The contingency rate in the first quadrant was 86.0% (16, 17) and 83.5% (26, 27) in the second quadrant. It is important for the clinician to know the high probability of finding the MB2 canal in the maxillary first and second molars. CBCT imaging can facilitate the clinician to detect complex and variable root canal anatomy.