Prevalence Of Ocular Pathology Research Articles

A Review of the Prevalence of Ophthalmologic Diseases in Native American Populations

Compared with the general population in North America, Native American/American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations experience a disparate prevalence of eye diseases. Visual impairment is a barrier to communication, interferes with academic and social success, and decreases overall quality of life. The prevalence of ocular pathology could serve as an indicator of health and social disparities. Therefore, the objective of this research was to perform a thorough review comparing the prevalence of common ophthalmological pathologies between AI/AN and non-AI/AN individuals in North America. Retrospective, cross-sectional study. A total of 57 articles were retrieved and reviewed, and 14 met the criteria outlined for inclusion. These articles were retrieved from PubMed, MEDLINE, and ISI Web of Knowledge. Only studies that were peer reviewed in the last 25 years and reported on the prevalence of eye diseases in AI/AN compared with a non-AI/AN population met criteria. Rates of retinopathy, cataracts, visual impairment, and blindness were clearly higher for AI/AN compared with non-AI/AN counterparts. Although rates of macular degeneration and glaucoma were similar between AI/AN and non-AI/AN populations, the treatment rates were lower and associated with poorer outcomes in AI/AN individuals. There are considerable inequities in the prevalence and treatment rates of ophthalmologic conditions in AI/AN individuals. A likely explanation is the barrier of lack of access to adequate health and eye care. Because of substantial underinsurance and geographic variability, attention needs to be brought to expanding eye care access to AI/AN communities. The results are subject to the availability of appropriate technology, health literacy, and language.

Comparison of Two Photoscreeners in a Population of Syrian Refugee Children.

To evaluate children in the Za'atari refugee camp in Jordan to better understand the prevalence of ocular pathology and to compare two photoscreening devices to evaluate their utility. Families at the Syrian American Medical Society Clinic were offered vision screening for children aged 1 to 18 years. Participants were offered visual acuity measurement and photoscreening with two devices approved for use in the United States. If visual acuity in either eye was worse than 20/40 or either photoscreening device indicated possible pathology, a complete eye examination was performed with cycloplegic refraction and dilated examination. Ninety-one participants completed the screening protocol. The average age of participants who completed the study was 7.8 years (range: 1 to 16 years). Twenty-eight participants (30.8%) failed at least one screening component. In this population, the following pathology was identified: astigmatism (12.1%), esotropia (9.9%), amblyopia (9.9%), hyperopia (7.7%), exotropia (3.3%), and myopia (1.1%). The Plusoptix vision screener (Plusoptix) had a sensitivity of 100% for the identification of amblyopia and 85% specificity. The GoCheck Kids application (Gobiquity) had a sensitivity of 66.67% for the identification of amblyopia and 94% specificity. The positive predictive value for the Plusoptix vision screener and the GoCheck Kids application for the detection of amblyopia risk factors was 77% for both. The high rate of ophthalmic pathology identified in this study reinforces the urgent need for proper vision screening and intervention in this population. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021;58(6):396-400.].

Resident Perspectives 56–3

Resident Perspectives 56–3

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of the Red Reflex Test for Ocular Pathology in Infants

Red reflex testing is a simple and inexpensive method implemented in many countries as an important part of infant screening for ocular pathologies. To review the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of the red reflex test in infant screening for ocular pathologies and to perform meta-analyses to provide summary estimates. The following literature databases were searched for English-language, peer-reviewed literature, published until April 19, 2020: Cochrane Central, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents Connect, Data Citation Index, Derwent Innovations Index, KCI-Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index, SciELO Citation Index, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligibility criteria were defined according to population (studies of consecutively screened infants), exposure (red reflex or Brückner test as the index test), comparator (any ophthalmological examination), and study type (any study with diagnostic test accuracy data). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines were followed. Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. For summary estimates of diagnostic test accuracy, the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve was used. Prevalence of ocular pathologies was introduced for a prevalence meta-analysis, which was then used in calculations of diagnostic accuracy of the red reflex test when applied in infant screening. True-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative findings; sensitivity; specificity; and positive and negative predictive values. In this meta-analysis, 8713 unique infants from 5 unique studies were eligible for qualitative and quantitative review. All studies used the red reflex test without pupillary dilation and were compared with a reference test performed with pupillary dilation. For any ocular pathology, an estimated sensitivity of 7.5% (95% CI, 7.4%-7.5%) and specificity of 97.5% (95% CI, 97.5%-97.5%) was found. Focusing on ocular pathologies that required a medical or surgical intervention, sensitivity improved to 17.5% (95% CI, 0.8%-84.8%) and specificity remained high at 97.6% (95% CI, 87.7%-99.6%). These findings suggest that an abnormal red reflex finding most likely reflects an underlying ocular pathology. However, a normal red reflex finding during screening does not exclude ocular disease.

Visual impairment and the prevalence of ocular pathology in homeless children and adults globally: a systematic review

BackgroundHomelessness is a global issue in developing and developed countries. This article is the first systematic review to explore its impact on visual health globally. MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted on OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Peer-reviewed English-language studies with a focus on homeless children or adults that reported on ocular outcomes were included. Primary outcomes and secondary endpoints were reported via weighted averages. Primary outcomes between homeless children and homeless adults were compared using the Fisher exact test. ResultsThere were 5774 individuals across 23 full-text articles included in the review. For studies reporting primary outcomes, 36.8% of homeless individuals self-reported dissatisfaction with their vision, 26.8% self-reported a previous ocular pathology, 26.3% had uncorrected refractive error, 25.6% were functionally visually impaired, 9.2% had at least one previous eye surgery or procedure, and 4.0% had nonrefractive visual impairment. Upon screening, 25.1% of homeless individuals had some type of ocular pathology, which included cornea and external eye diseases (13.4%), glaucoma (7.4%), cataracts (6.3%), retinal diseases (5.3%), ocular motility disorders (4.7%), trauma (2.3%), neuro-ophthalmological conditions (1.7%), and oculoplastic conditions (0.7%). Homeless adults had significantly more visual impairment (p < 0.001), uncorrected refractive error (p < 0.001), ocular pathology (p < 0.001), cataracts (p < 0.001), retinal pathology (p < 0.001), and neuro-ophthalmological conditions (p < 0.001) relative to children. ConclusionsVisual impairment in homeless individuals is higher than the general population. Uncorrected refractive error is a leading cause of visual impairment in this population. Additionally, homeless adults have significantly more visual impairment and ocular pathology than homeless children. Future studies should also explore if these differences are consistent in developing countries and investigate ways to increase eye care access for homeless individuals.

Ocular alignment, media, and eyelid disorders in Down syndrome

ABSTRACT Background Determining the age and gender distribution of ocular disorders in Down syndrome patients aged 10 to 30 years. Methods In this study, 226 of 250 invited patients through special needs schools, the National Down Syndrome Society, and relevant nonprofit organizations were included. In Noor Eye Hospital, the patients underwent a complete eye examination by a general ophthalmologist and suspect cases were reexamined by a sub-specialist. Examinations included ocular alignment, conjunctiva, eyelid, lacrimal system, cornea, iris, and lens assessment. Results Mean age of participants was 16.05 ± 4.82 years and 53.0% were male. The most common ocular abnormalities were blepharitis (81.9%, 95% CI:78.0 to 85.3), lens opacity (37.8%, 95% CI:33.3 to 42.3), strabismus (23.4%, 95% CI:19.5 to 27.4; 21.2% esotropia, 0.9% exotropia, and 1.8% dissociated vertical deviation), floppy eyelid (19.9%, 95% CI:16.3 to 23.9), posterior embryotoxon (17.7%, 95% CI:14.2 to 21.2) and nystagmus (11.7%, 95% CI:8.9 to 15.0). Based on independent sample t test, the prevalence of nystagmus (P = .041) and congenital lens opacity (P<0.001) significantly increased with age. There was no significant inter-gender difference in the prevalence of any of the studied disorders by chi-square test. Conclusion In young patients with Down syndrome, the prevalence of ocular pathologies appears to be high and increase with aging. It can be resulted from the cumulative prevalence of undiagnosed or untreated cases. Findings of the study can be a reliable reference for health policy in terms of screening for eye disease and addressing eye care needs.

Prevalence of Ocular Pathology on Initial Screening and Incidence of New Findings on Follow-up Examinations in Children With Trisomy 21

Various ophthalmologic findings have been associated with trisomy 21. However, prior studies on this topic are limited by their sample size and the lack of follow-up regarding the incidence of new pathology after an initially normal examination. We determined whether children who have a normal first examination need to have formal reevaluation by an ophthalmologist. Retrospective cohort study. Records were reviewed for 689 patients with trisomy 21 evaluated at Vanderbilt Eye Institute between 2012 and 2017. Ocular and refractive abnormalities present on initial screening were recorded and follow-up data were reviewed to determine if new abnormalities developed at subsequent visits. Of the 689 patients, 410 (59.5%) had a significant finding on their first examination. The most common abnormalities seen on initial screening examination were strabismus, significant refractive error, and eyelid abnormalities (including ectropion and accessory puncta). Of the 279 initially normal patients, 179 had at least 1 follow-up visit at a mean follow-up interval of 21.6months (average age 3.7 years). At the first follow-up visit, 129 remained normal, while 50 had a new abnormality, most commonly significant refractive error and strabismus. On second follow-up visit, at a mean follow-up interval of 12months (average age 4.8 years), 63% remained normal. Ocular pathology occurs in trisomy 21 at a much higher prevalence than the general population; thus these children initially should have a comprehensive eye examination. Although the development of new ocular pathology in a child with trisomy 21 and a previously normal examination is not unusual, most of these new abnormalities are detectable with automated vision screening techniques or direct visual inspection of the eyes and ocular adnexa; thus once a child has a normal examination, a formal vision screening could replace a formal ophthalmologic examination.

Prevalencia de patología oftalmológica en prematuros menores de un año de edad

AbstrAct Prevalence of ocular pathology in premature children under one year of age objective: to report ocular abnormalities in premature infants examined before one year of corrected Gesta-tional age (cGa). Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of a number of premature infants ([birth weight (BW) ≤ 1 500 g and/or ≤ 32 week gestational age (GA)] born between 2006 and 2009 and examined before one year of cGa. Ga, bW, retinopathy of prematurity (Rop), cGa examination, re-fraction, anisometropia and strabismus information were recorded. results: Out of the 149 premature infants born during the period, 100 had eye exam before one year of age (67.14%), the mean GA and BW was 29.3 (range 23-36) weeks and 1217 (343-2190) g, respectively. 29% had ROP, 4% required treatment. The mean CGA at the time of ophthalmologic examination was 6.4 (3 to 11.5) months. The spherical equivalent was +1.34 D (-1.75 to +5.75), 2.2% presented anisometropia > 1D (95% CI, -0.82 to 5.26). 3.3% (95% CI, -0.38 to 7.04) were in need of glasses according to international recommendations and 4% (95% CI, 0.16 to 7.84) had strabismus.