Prevalence Of New-onset Atrial Fibrillation Research Articles

Prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common lower respiratory tract infection, often complicated by cardiovascular events, including cardiac arrhythmias. New-onset atrial fibrillation (newAF) has been associated with increased mortality in CAP patients, especially in those critically ill; however, limited data on the prevalence of newAF in patients with CAP are available. We aim to estimate the pooled prevalence of newAF and its impact on adverse outcomes in patients with CAP, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception to 27 January 2022. All studies reporting the prevalence of newAF in CAP patients were included and all-cause mortality was extracted when available. The pooled prevalence of newAF, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), and 95% Prediction Intervals (PI) were computed. The inconsistency index (I2) was calculated to measure heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were also performed. A protocol for this study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022307422). Among 7,655 records retrieved, 10 studies were included, with a total of 280,589 CAP patients. Pooled prevalence of newAF in CAP patients was 7.6% (95% CI 6.4-9.0%, 95% PI 4.3-13.1%, I2 = 95%). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences according to geographical location or study design. Patients with newAF had a higher risk of mortality among the studies included in the systematic review. NewAF is a common complication, occurring in 7.6% of CAP patients, with prediction intervals suggesting an even higher burden. CAP patients who develop newAF during hospitalization may be at higher risk of mortality in both short- and long-term follow-up.

Prevalence of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Associated Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common complication in patients with sepsis, although its prevalence and impact on outcomes are still unclear. We aim to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of NOAF in patients with sepsis, and its impact on in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched on 26 December 2021. Studies reporting on the prevalence of NOAF and/or its impact on in-hospital mortality or ICU mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. The pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, as well as the risk ratios (RR), 95%CI and 95% prediction intervals (PI) for outcomes. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed to account for heterogeneity. Results: Among 4988 records retrieved from the literature search, 22 articles were included. Across 207,847 patients with sepsis, NOAF was found in 13.5% (95%CI: 8.9–20.1%), with high heterogeneity between studies; significant subgroup differences were observed, according to the geographical location, study design and sample size of the included studies. A multivariable meta-regression model showed that sample size and geographical location account for most of the heterogeneity. NOAF patients showed an increased risk of both in-hospital mortality (RR: 1.69, 95%CI: 1.47–1.96, 95%PI: 1.15–2.50) and ICU mortality (RR: 2.12, 95%CI: 1.86–2.43, 95%PI: 1.71–2.63), with moderate to no heterogeneity between the included studies. Conclusions: NOAF is a common complication during sepsis, being present in one out of seven individuals. Patients with NOAF are at a higher risk of adverse events during sepsis, and may need specific therapeutical interventions.

Gender-specific relationship between abdominal obesity and prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation in the general Japanese population

Abstract Background The number of incidences of atrial fibrillation (AF) is expected to rise rapidly in the near future because of the increased number of geriatric patients in Japanese society. In addition, obesity is increasing in the general Japanese population. Although a higher body mass index is associated with a higher risk of AF, the relationship between abdominal obesity (large waist circumference) and new-onset AF is unclear. Methods and results We performed a longitudinal retrospective observational study from January 2007 to October 2018 using the annual health checkup data. Data from 58,844 adults (29,572 males, age 54±13 years) without baseline AF, who underwent routine health checkups, were analyzed. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the strength of the association between abdominal obesity and new-onset AF. We also examined the effect of abdominal obesity on the incidences of AF stratified by gender. During a median follow-up of 4 years, we recorded new cases of AF in 322 (0.5%) individuals. In univariate analysis, a large waist circumference was significantly associated with new-onset AF, both in males [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.05, p<0.001] and in females (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06, p=0.002), respectively. In multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical variables (age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate, habitual drinking and diabetes), a large waist circumference was significantly and independently associated with new-onset AF in males (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06, p<0.001), but not in females (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.04, p=0.269). Conclusion Abdominal obesity is independently associated with an increased risk of new-onset AF in males. This association in males might imply some sex-specific mechanisms. There might be a gender difference in the effectiveness of interventions to decrease abdominal obesity to prevent AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

New Onset Atrial Fibrillation Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a well-recognised, although variably reported complication following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Rates of NOAF following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) seem to be notably less than SAVR, even though this population is typically older and of higher risk. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NOAF in both these populations and associated postoperative outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting rates of NOAF post SAVR or TAVI, along with early postoperative outcomes. Twenty-five (25) studies with a total of 13,010 patients were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of NOAF post SAVR was 0.4 (95% CI 0.36-0.44) and post TAVI 0.15 (95% CI 0.11-0.18). NOAF was associated with an increased risk of postoperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA) for SAVR and TAVI (RR 1.44 95% CI 1.01-2.06 and RR 2.24 95% CI 1.46-3.45 respectively). NOAF was associated with increased mortality in the TAVI group (RR 3.02 95% CI 1.55-5.9) but not the SAVR group (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.54-1.84). Hospital length of stay was increased for both TAVI and SAVR patients with NOAF (MD 2.54 days, 95% CI 2.0-3.00) and (MD 1.64 days, 95% CI 0.04-3.24 respectively). The prevalence of NOAF is significantly less following TAVI, as compared to SAVR. While NOAF is associated with increased risk of postoperative stroke for both groups, for TAVI alone NOAF confers increased risk of early mortality.

New-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for left main disease.

Aim To determine the prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and its effect on 6-month cardiovascular outcomes. Methods This prospective study included 40 patients diagnosed with LMCAD, in the period from 2017 to 2018. The patients with LMCAD and low or intermediate SYNTAX score were randomized to PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents versus CABG. Outcomes were analyzed according to the development of NOAF during the initial hospitalization following revascularization. Results Among 40 patients without atrial fibrillation on presentation, NOAF developed 3.1±1.3 days during hospitalization in three CABG treated patients, and one PCI treated patient. One patient that was CABG treated developed NOAF after two months. Patients with versus patients without NOAF had a significantly longer duration of hospitalization, probably because they were discharged on anticoagulant therapy. Myocardial infarction was presented in one CABG treated patient after 3 months, and also in one PCI treated patient after 4 months. One patient died 2 months after the operation, and one developed stroke 5 months after the CABG operation. Conclusion The NOAF was common after CABG, but extremely rare after PCI, and it occurred almost exclusively following CABG. There was a clear statistical tendency for all-cause death, cardiovascular death and stroke at 6-month follow-up period.

Short-Term Complications and Resource Utilization in Matched Subjects After On-Pump or Off-Pump Primary Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass

Studies suggest that patients who undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) have fewer short-term complications and use fewer inpatient resources than do patients who undergo standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with extracorporeal circulation. However, dissimilarity between groups in risk factors for complications has hindered interpretation of results. To compare the prevalence of selected complications (atrial fibrillation, stroke, reoperation, and bleeding) and inpatient resource utilization (length of stay, discharge disposition, total charges) between subjects undergoing primary isolated CABG or OPCABG who were matched with respect to key risk factors. Retrospective, causal-comparative survey conducted in 1 center for 18 months. Patients who underwent primary isolated CABG or OPCABG were matched for sex, age (within 2 years), left ventricular ejection fraction (within 0.05), and graft-patient ratio (exact match) and compared for prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation, stroke, reoperation within 24 hours, and bleeding. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon and t tests for paired comparisons. The sample (107 matched pairs) was 63% male, with a mean age of 66 (SD 9.5) years, a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.51 (SD 0.13), and a mean graft-patient ratio of 3.41 (SD 0.74). The 2 groups did not differ significantly in New York Heart Association class (P = .43), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (P = .22), postoperative beta-blocker use (P = .73), or comorbid conditions. None of the complications examined differed significantly between pairs. Patients with comparable risk profiles have similar prevalences of selected complications after CABG and OPCABG.

Resource Utilization Related to Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Studies of resource utilization by patients with new-onset atrialfibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting have addressed only length of stay and bed charges. To compare resource utilization between patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation and patients without atrialfibrillation after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Retrospective review of clinical and administrative electronic databases for 720 subjects who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass in 25 months at one medical center The prevalence of atrial fibrillation was determined, and resource utilization in various hospital cost centers was compared between subjects with and without atrialfibrillation. The prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation was 33.1%. Compared with subjects without atrialfibrillation, subjects with atrialfibrillation had a longer stay (5.8 +/- 2.4 vs. 4.4+/-1.2 days, P<.001), more days receiving mechanical ventilation (P =.002) and oxygen therapy (P<.001), and higher rates of readmission to the intensive care unit (4.6% vs. 0.2%, P<.001). Subjects with atrial fibrillation also had more laboratory tests (P<.001) and more days receiving cardiac drugs, heparin, diuretics, and electrolytes. Subjects with atrialfibrillation had higher total postoperative charges ($57261 +/- $17101 vs. $50905 +/- $10062, P = .001), a mean difference of $6356. The mean differences were greatest for bed charges ($1642), laboratory charges ($1215), pharmacy ($989), and respiratory care ($582). The economic impact of atrialfibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting has been underestimated.

Atrial fibrillation: prevalence after minimally invasive direct and standard coronary artery bypass

Background. This study identified and compared the prevalence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AFIB) following standard coronary artery bypass grafting (SCABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and minimally invasive direct vision coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) without CPB. A further comparison was made between AFIB prevalence in SCABG and MIDCAB subjects with two or fewer bypasses.Methods. This is a retrospective, comparative survey. Patients with new-onset AFIB who underwent SCABG or MIDCAB alone were identified electronically using a triangulated method (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9 CM] code; clinical database word search; and pharmacy database drug search).Results. The total sample (n = 814; 94 MIDCAB, 720 SCABG) exhibited a trend toward lower AFIB prevalence in MIDCAB (23.4%) versus SCABG (33.1%) subjects (p = 0.059). AFIB prevalence in the SCABG subset with two or less vessel bypasses (n = 98; n = 18 single vessel, n = 80 double vessels) and MIDCAB subjects (n = 94; n = 90 single vessels, n = 4 double vessels) was almost identical (SCABG subset 24.5% versus MIDCAB 23.4%, p = 0.860). Slightly more than half (56.9%) of new-onset AFIB subjects were identified by ICD-9 CM codes, with the remainder by word search (37.7%) or procainamide query (5.4%).Conclusions. In this sample, the number of vessels bypassed seemed to have a greater influence on AFIB prevalence than the application of CPB or the surgical approach. Retrospective identification of AFIB cases by ICD-9 CM code grossly underestimated AFIB prevalence.