Prevalence Of Fall Risk Factors Research Articles

Physical Functioning in Patients with a Recent Fracture: The “Can Do, Do Do” Framework Applied to Explore Physical Capacity, Physical Activity and Fall Risk Factors

Physical capacity (PC) and physical activity (PA) are associated physical performance measures, and combined, PC and PA are used to categorize physical performance in the “can do, do do” framework. We aimed to explore physical performance of patients attending the fracture liaison service (FLS). In this cross-sectional study, PC was measured by 6-min-walking-test (can’t do/can do) and PA by accelerometer (don’t do/do do). Following quadrants were defined based on predefined cut-off scores for poor performance: (1) “can’t do, don’t do”; (2) “can do, don’t do”; (3) “can’t do, do do”; (4) “can do, do do”. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated and fall and fracture risk factors were assessed between quadrants. Physical performance of 400 fracture patients was assessed (mean age 64; female 70.8%). Patients performed as follows: 8.3% “can’t do, don’t do”; 3.0% “can do, don’t do”; 19.3% “can’t do, do do”; 69.5% “can do, do do”. For the “can’t do” group the OR for low PA was 9.76 (95% CI: 4.82–19.80). Both the “can’t do, don’t do” and “can’t do, do do” group differed significantly compared to the “can do, do do” group on several fall and fracture risk factors and had lower physical performance. The “can do, do do” framework is able to identify fracture patients with an impaired physical performance. Of all FLS patients 20% “can’t do, but “do do” while having a high prevalence of fall risk factors compared to persons that “can do, do do”, which may indicate this group is prone to fall.

Staff and Administrator Perceptions of Fall Risk Management in Home- and Community-Based Service Settings

Older adults who receive home- and community-based services (HCBS), such as home-delivered meals and personal care assistance, are at particular risk for falls due to their extremely high prevalence of fall risk factors. HCBS organizations and their staff are well-positioned to implement fall risk screens with HCBS clients and then refer older adults to fall prevention services as needed; however, the extent to which HCBS organizations manage fall risk has yet to be systematically examined. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the barriers to and facilitators of implementing fall risk screens and fall prevention service referrals in HCBS organizations. A total of 26 HCBS staff members and administrators participated in semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Qualitative data were examined using directed content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. HCBS staff expressed that strong rapport with clients allowed for them to address fall risk proactively but were concerned that their lack of fall prevention training precluded them from effective fall risk management. HCBS administrators perceived their organization to have reliable internal communication procedures which enhanced fall prevention care coordination but believed their limited connections with fall prevention service providers served as a barrier to referring at-risk clients to appropriate care. Accordingly, HCBS stakeholders are encouraged to develop strategies, such as providing fall prevention coaching and building a network of fall prevention service providers, that account for these barriers and facilitators in future efforts to support effective fall risk management with HCBS clients.

Associations between gait speed and well-known fall risk factors among community-dwelling older adults.

Exercise interventions are effective at preventing falls in community-dwelling older adults, especially before disability is present. Gait speed below 1.0m/s is a strong predictor for falls in the elderly. However, evidence is sparse for gait speed alone being sufficient to identify individuals at a high risk of falling. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of fall risk factors among community-dwelling older adults in their late 70s and to investigate the associations between these risk factors and low gait speed in this population. This cross-sectional cohort study comprised 108 elderly living in a small Norwegian municipality, born between 1936 and 1938. Exclusion criteria were living in residential care, inability to walk 4m, and severe cognitive impairment. Measurements included gait speed, depressive symptoms, executive functions, fear of falling, vision function, fall history, body mass index, medications, and comorbidity. Gait speed was dichotomized using a cut-off of 1m/s, and associations between different risk factors and low gait speed was explored using logistic regression analysis. Mean gait speed was 1.0±0.3m/s. In 44.4% of the participants, gait speed was below 1.0m/s, indicating increased fall risk. Low gait speed was significantly associated with a history of multiple falls (odds ratio [OR]=3.70, 95% CI [1.18, 11.65]), low educational level (OR=3.58, 95% CI [1.10, 11.66]), higher number of medications (OR=4.28, 95% CI [1.63, 11.2]), and higher number of depressive symptoms (OR=1.31, 95% CI [1.09, 1.58]). We found no significant associations between gait speed and comorbidity, sex, vision, executive functions, or fear of falling. Our results indicate that gait speed with cut-off 1.0m/s could represent a useful tool for identifying individuals who are vulnerable but not yet disabled and could benefit from fall-preventive exercise. However, extended assessment is probably needed to personalize interventions.

Fall Risk Profile and Quality-of-Life Status of Older Chiropractic Patients

Objectives The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of fall risk factors in older chiropractic patients. The secondary aim was to investigate the quality-of-life status of older chiropractic patients and to see whether a history of falling was related to quality-of-life status. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at 12 chiropractic practices throughout Auckland, New Zealand, and Melbourne, Australia. The study involved gaining a profile of health status, fall history, and fall risk from active chiropractic patients who were 65 years or older. Results One hundred ten older chiropractic patients were approached, and 101 agreed to participate in this study (response rate, 91.8%). Thirty-five percent of participants had experienced at least 1 fall in the previous 12 months. Of those that had fallen, 80% had at least a minor injury, with 37% of fallers requiring medical attention and 6% suffering a serious injury. The prevalence of most fall risk factors was consistent with published data for community-dwelling older adults. Quality of life of older chiropractic patients appeared to be good, but fallers reported a lower physical component summary score compared with nonfallers ( P = .04). Conclusions A portion of the older chiropractic patients sampled in this study had a substantial risk of falling. This risk could be assessed on a regular basis for the presence of modifiable fall risk factors, and appropriate advice, given when fall risks are identified.

Falls and consequent injuries in hospitalized patients: effects of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program

BackgroundPatient falls in hospitals are common and may lead to negative outcomes such as injuries, prolonged hospitalization and legal liability. Consequently, various hospital falls prevention programs have been implemented in the last decades. However, most of the programs had no sustained effects on falls reduction over extended periods of time.MethodsThis study used a serial survey design to examine in-patient fall rates and consequent injuries before and after the implementation of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program (IFP) in a 300-bed urban public hospital. The population under study included adult patients, hospitalized in the departments of internal medicine, geriatrics, and surgery. Administrative patient data and fall incident report data from 1999 to 2003 were examined and summarized using frequencies, proportions, means and standard deviations and were analyzed accordingly.ResultsA total of 34,972 hospitalized patients (mean age: 67.3, SD ± 19.3 years; female 53.6%, mean length of stay: 11.9 ± 13.2 days, mean nursing care time per day: 3.5 ± 1.4 hours) were observed during the study period. Overall, a total of 3,842 falls affected 2,512 (7.2%) of the hospitalized patients. From these falls, 2,552 (66.4%) were without injuries, while 1,142 (29.7%) falls resulted in minor injuries, and 148 (3.9%) falls resulted in major injuries. The overall fall rate in the hospitals' patient population was 8.9 falls per 1,000 patient days. The fall rates fluctuated slightly from 9.1 falls in 1999 to 8.6 falls in 2003. After the implementation of the IFP, in 2001 a slight decrease to 7.8 falls per 1,000 patient days was observed (p = 0.086). The annual proportion of minor and major injuries did not decrease after the implementation of the IFP. From 1999 to 2003, patient characteristics changed in terms of slight increases (female gender, age, consumed nursing care time) or decreases (length of hospital stay), as well as the prevalence of fall risk factors increased up to 46.8% in those patients who fell.ConclusionFollowing the implementation of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program, neither the frequencies of falls nor consequent injuries decreased substantially. Future studies need to incorporate strategies to maximize and evaluate ongoing adherence to interventions in hospital falls prevention programs.

Increased Prevalence of Fall Risk Factors in Older People following Hip Fracture

Background: Many people who suffer a hip fracture do not achieve full functional recovery. Simple tests of physical function such as quadriceps strength and postural sway may provide insight into why this population is at increased risk of experiencing further falls and fractures and assist in developing rehabilitation strategies for preventing falls. Objective: To determine whether impairments in a range of physiological measures and specific medical conditions are more prevalent in people who have suffered a fall-related hip fracture than in a matched sample of community-dwelling people without a history of falls. Methods: This case-control study involved 88 older people. The hip fracture group comprised 44 persons aged 64–94 years, assessed on average 7 months following a fall-related hip fracture. An age- and sex-matched control group (older persons who had not fallen in a 12-month period before recruitment) was drawn randomly from community samples. Results: Compared with the control group, the hip fracture group had markedly reduced quadriceps strength and increased body sway when tested on firm and compliant (foam rubber) surfaces. Patients in the hip fracture group also had higher prevalence rates of poor vision, arthritis and stroke, were taking more medications, were less physically active and perceived themselves to be at greater risk of falling than the control group. No significant differences were apparent for cardiovascular conditions, subjective health status and psychoactive medication use between the groups. Multivariate analyses identified quadriceps strength and body sway on the compliant surface as the most important variables for distinguishing between the hip fracture and no hip fracture groups. These two variables correctly classified 92% of the cases, with equal sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: The findings identify an increased prevalence of certain physical fall risk factors among older persons who have suffered a hip fracture. Decreased quadriceps strength and increased postural sway are potentially modifiable. Intervention programs designed to improve performance on these variables among this population require investigation.