Prevalence Of Dysthymic Disorder Research Articles

Dysthymic disorder in the elderly population

The diagnosis of dysthymic disorder was created in DSM-III and maintained in DSM-IV to describe a depressive syndrome of mild to moderate severity of at least two years' duration that did not meet criteria for major depressive disorder. The prevalence of dysthymic disorder is approximately 2% in the elderly population where subsyndromal depressions of lesser severity are more common. Dysthymic disorder was replaced in DSM-V by the diagnosis of "persistent depressive disorder" that includes chronic major depression and dysthymic disorder. In older adults, epidemiological and clinical evidence supports the use of the term "dysthymic disorder." In contrast to young adults with dysthymic disorder, older adults with dysthymic disorder commonly present with late age of onset, without major depression and other psychiatric disorders, and with a low rate of family history of mood disorders. They often have stressors such as loss of social support and bereavement, and some have cerebrovascular or neurodegenerative pathology. A minority has chronic depression dating from youth with psychiatric comorbidity similar to young adults with dysthymic disorder. In older adults, both dysthymic disorder and subsyndromal depression increase disability and lead to poor medical outcomes. Elderly patients with dysthymic disorder are seen mainly in primary care where identification and treatment are often inadequate. Treatment with antidepressant medication shows marginal superiority over placebo in controlled trials, and problem-solving therapy shows similar efficacy. Combined treatment and collaborative care models show slightly better results, but cost effectiveness is a concern. Further work is needed to clarify optimal approaches to the treatment of dysthymic disorder in elderly patients.

Comparison of Obesity/Psychological Disorders Comorbid between Older and Younger Adult Women

Introduction: Epidemiologic data proposed a relationship between obesity and depression in older adults. We conducted this study to evaluate the association between obesity and depressive disorders, as well as a range of eating disorders in old women. Methods: From a total of 1477 clients referred to an outpatient clinic, 212 obese persons (97 persons 60+ and 115 persons 40 - 59 years of age) were enrolled. Data of demographics, comorbidities, anthropometrics, physical activity level, and diet, as well as, depressive and eating disorders were collected. Depressive and eating disorders were assessed using diagnostic structural interview based on DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder—fourth edition— Text version). BMI more than or equal to 30 was considered as obesity. Results: The prevalence of dysthymic disorder was significantly lower in older women compared to younger (p = 0.026). Comparable but not significant results were observed for major depression disorder, Bulimia Nervosa, and eating disorders not otherwise specified. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that obese older women were less likely to suffer from Comorbid dysthymic disorder/obesity compared to younger.

Depressive disorders and unprotected casual anal sex among Australian homosexually active men in primary care.

To examine the relationship between depressive disorders and unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners, among homosexually active men attending for primary care. The first 460 homosexually active men enrolling in an Australian integrated primary care programme were screened for current depressive disorders using the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) and completed questionnaires on their sexual behaviour in the prior 6 months. One hundred and sixty-two (35%) were HIV positive, 283 (62%) were HIV negative and 15 (3%) were untested. The prevalence of major depressive episode (MDE), as measured by the PRIME-MD, on enrollment was 28% (129/460), while the prevalence of dysthymic disorder (DD) was 26% (121/460). These include 84 men (18%) who met the criteria for both disorders ('double depression'). Neither disorder was associated with HIV status. Men with MDE were less likely to have been sexually active than the remainder of the cohort (90/129 [70%] vs. 291/331 [88%]; OR: 0.32 [95% CI: 0.19-0.52]; P<0.0001). Men with DD alone, however, were significantly more likely than men with neither disorder to report having had unprotected anal intercourse with a casual partner (11/38 [29%] vs. 43/292 [15%]; OR: 2.36 [95%CI: 1.09-5.10]; P=0.035). Depressive disorders were highly prevalent in this cohort and independent of HIV status. MDE was associated with reduced sexual activity. Among men without MDE, the presence of DD was independently associated with an increased likelihood of reporting unsafe anal sex with a casual partner in the prior 6 months.

Prevalence of dysthymic disorder in primary care

Background: Dysthymic disorder is characterised as a chronic state of depressed mood which is not otherwise attributable to physical, psychological or social events. While it can occur alone, there is increasing evidence that the majority of individuals who meet criteria for dysthymic disorder also experience more severe episodic mood disorders throughout their lifetime, and there is also an aggregation of mood disorders within their family members. Patients with dysthymic disorder are most often seen in primary care. Some researchers suggest that the majority of these individuals are never diagnosed or are not diagnosed until a more severe episodic mood disorder develops. The objective of this study was to determine the 12-month prevalence of Axis I psychiatric disorders, and in particular dysthymic disorder, in a primary care Health Service Organization in Ontario, Canada. Methods: Eligible and consenting adults registered with a primary care Health Service Organization were screened using the modified form of the University of Michigan Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Results: Of the 6280 eligible subjects, 4327 (69%) consented to screening. Two hundred and twenty-two (5.1%) subjects screened positive for dysthymic disorder. In addition, 90% of those who screened positive for dysthymic disorder also screened positive for other Axis I disorders including major depressive disorder, panic, simple phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Conclusions: There is much potential for the primary care physician to play a pivotal role in the recognition and treatment of dysthymic disorder and associated Axis I disorders. A focus on the family as a unit for care may be especially important given the reported aggregation of dysthymic disorder within families.

Prevalence and comorbidity of dysthymic disorder among psychiatric outpatients

We investigated prevalence and comorbidity of DSM-III dysthymic disorder in a psychiatric outpatient clinic. Seventy-five consecutive outpatients received structured interviews. Prevalence of dysthymic disorder was 36% in the consecutive sample. Thirty-four dysthymic and 56 non-dysthymic patients were compared for comorbidity. Dysthymic subjects were more likely to meet criteria for major depression, social phobia, and avoidant, self-defeating, dependent, and borderline personality disorders. Dysthymic disorder was usually of early onset, predating comorbid disorders, and had often not received adequate antidepressant treatment. These results help define dysthymic disorder as prevalent, usually predating axis I comorbidity, and associated with particular axis II diagnoses.

Dysthymic disorder in the aged in the community

The prevalence of dysthymic disorder and and its relationship to social and health variables were investigated in a Finnish population aged 60 years or over. The prevalence was lower in men (17.2 per 100) than in women (22.9 per 100). In the total population the occurrence was higher in the widowed (24.9 per 100) than in the married (18.3 per 100). In men, dysthymic disorder was more common in those with a lower educational level (22.6 per 100) than with a higher educational level (15.1 per 100), and more common in persons receiving long-term institutional care or home nursing or home help (28.7 per 100) than in persons living independently at home (14.6 per 100). The rate was not related to age, marital status or occupation. In women, the occurrence was not related to age, marital status, education, occupation or form of social and health care. The female rate was higher than the male in the older group (70 yrs. +), in married persons, in those with a higher educational level and in those living independently at home. Underdiagnosing was evident. The occurrence of dysthymic disorder was related to poor health and poor functional status and to the occurrence of social and health stressors. No differences were found in the occurrence of the related factors between persons with dysthymic disorder and persons with major depression. Our results support the conclusion that the majority of cases of dysthymic disorders in the elderly are affective illnesses and not personality disorders.