Prevalence Of Cervical Spine Injuries Research Articles

Which adults aged 65 and older are at low-risk for cervical spine injuries after low-level falls?

The population is aging and falls are a common reason for emergency department visits. Appropriate imaging in this population is important. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of cervical spine injury and identify factors associated with cervical spine injuries in adults ≥ 65years after low-level falls. This was a pre-specified sub-study of a prospective observational cohort study of intracranial bleeding in emergency patients ≥ 65years presenting after low-level falls. The primary outcome was cervical spine injury. The risk factors of interest were Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 15, head injury, neck pain, age, and frailty defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the strength of association between risk factors and cervical spine injury. A descriptive analysis of absence of significant risk factors was performed to determine patients who may not require imaging. There were 4308 adults ≥ 65 who sustained low-level falls with mean age of 82.0 (standard deviation ± 8.8) years and 1538 (35.7%) were male; 23 [0.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.8%)] were diagnosed with cervical spine injuries. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were 1.3 (0.5-3.2) for GCS < 15, 5.3 (1.7-26.7) for head injury, 13.0 (5.7-31.2) for new neck pain, 1.4 (1.0-1.8) for 5-year increase in age, and 1.1 (0.4-2.9) for frailty. Head injury or neck pain identified all 23 cervical spine injuries. Management was a rigid collar in 19/23 (82.6%) patients and none had surgery. In emergency patients ≥ 65years presenting after a low-level fall, head injury, neck pain, and older age were associated with the diagnosis of cervical spine injury. There were no cervical spine injuries in those without head injury or neck pain. Patients with no head injury or neck pain may not require cervical spine imaging.

(O-B1) A Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine the Injury Prevalence of Cervical Spine Injuries in Elderly Patients Undergoing Full Trauma CT

(O-B1) A Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine the Injury Prevalence of Cervical Spine Injuries in Elderly Patients Undergoing Full Trauma CT

Radiology diagnostics of spinal corel injury in early children: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) in young children includes a relatively higher prevalence of cervical spine injury, multiple thoracic vertebral compression fractures, and spinal cord injury. Spinal cord injuries without radiological changes/signs of fractures or dislocations (SCIWORA) also occur in young children. X-ray assessment of damage to immature vertebrae and cartilage in young children is difficult, since incompletely formed vertebral bodies can be confused with fractures. Accordingly, an MRI is required, which provides a detailed anatomical image of all structures of the spinal column and also diagnoses damage to the spinal cord, ligaments and muscles.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibilities of methods of radiation diagnosis of spinal cord injury in young children (up to 3 years).MATERIAL AND METHODS: 20 children aged from 11 months up to 3 years old were studied with spinal cord injury. X-ray, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. The standard MRI protocol for SCI in children under 3 years of age included: MR myelography in the coronary and sagittal projections, sagittal projection STIR, DTI and T2WI FS SE, axial projection T2WI FS SE or T2*WI FS GE; coronary projection T2WI SE; 3D T1WI FS GE before and after contrast enhancement.RESULTS: An analysis of the data of patients included in the category of polytrauma was carried out. The causes of SCI in these patients were road accidents and falls from various heights. X-ray and CT scans were uninformative, and had large discrepancies with MRI results. All anatomical and morphological changes revealed by MRI correlated well with clinical manifestations and corresponded to the classification of the level and severity of spinal cord injury (ASIA). An increase in the volume and change in the signal of the spinal cord due to edema and / or hemorrhage in the spinal cord is the main sign of damage to the spinal cord, and is best indicated on T2WI and STIR, as a hyperintense signal.DISCUSSION: MRI is critical in the emergency assessment of spinal cord injury or compression to predict the outcome of SCI. There is currently no spinal cord imaging technique that can compete with MRI. Increased volume and signal changes in the spinal cord due to edema and/or hemorrhage are a sign of spinal cord injury and are best demonstrated on T2WI and STIR as a hyperintense signal. Incomplete spinal cord injury is also manifested by a hyperintense signal on T2WI and/or FLAIR, which in intensity and extent correlates with the degree of injury. Hemorrhagic injuries are better detected using T2*GRE or SWI, and spinal cord edema is better detected using T2WI SE and STIR. In addition, STIR can identify bone marrow edema in injured vertebrae, even when the injury is not detected on CT.CONCLUSION: When performing MRI in patients with SCI, three quantitative parameters should be assessed: the maximum damage to the spinal cord, the maximum compression of the spinal cord, and the length of the affected area. In addition to the results of quantitative parameters, potential predictive qualitative MRI findings should be evaluated such as intramedullary hemorrhage, focal and diffuse spinal cord edema, soft tissue injury, probable stenosis before injury, and disc herniation.

Efficacy of Cervical Spine Muscle Strength Training in the Prevention of Cervical Spine Injuries in Hockey Players: A Critically Appraised Topic

Abstract&#x0D; Limited review of cervical spine injuries within the sport of ice hockey exist in the published world. Therefore, this paper sets out to locate, define, and critically appraise the topic to determine the frequency, severity, and possible interventions for the prevention and rehabilitation of cervical spine injuries in ice hockey. A call to action is advised to accurately track these injuries in order to better assist with the creation of a standardized protocol for treatment and reconditioning designed to assist strength and conditioning professionals in the reconditioning of athletes. Sufficient evidence supported the prevalence of cervical spine injuries in the sport of hockey. muscle strength and rigidity had little to no effect on the resistance of head impact acceleration.4 Regardless of linear velocity and peak angular velocity changes amongst individuals with varying isometric muscle strength of the cervical muscle, cervical spine injuries appear to be unrelated.8 The continued documentation of cervical spine injuries in hockey is necessary to gain a clearer understanding of the current prevalence of this specific injury. It appears that cervical spine injuries are less prevalent at the professional and international levels. This could potentially be attributed to a greater respect for athletic competition, as well as significant improvements of motor function and control exhibited by professional hockey players. Improving physiological performance appears to have little to no effect on cervical spine injuries.7,8,9 Unfortunately, little to no evidence currently exists, regarding the optimization of kinetic and kinematic actions within the cervical spine structure by way of improving muscle function, hypertrophy, or neuromuscular efficiency.&#x0D; Keywords: cervical spine injuries in hockey, neck injuries in the hockey, non-concussion-based spine injuries in hockey, neck strength, neck muscle activation, head kinematics&#x0D;

A Standardized Protocol for Cervical Spine Evaluation in Children Reduces Imaging Utilization: A Pilot Study of the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group Protocol.

Cervical spine injuries (CSI) have the potential to cause severe morbidity in children. Multiple imaging studies are used during evaluation of CSIs but come at a cost, both financially and in radiation exposure. To reduce resource utilization and radiation exposure, we implemented the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group (PCSCWG) standardized protocol (SP) for evaluating CSIs in children. Children below 18 years old presenting with concern for CSI at a level 1 pediatric trauma center were reviewed before (July 2015 to May 2016) and after (November 2017 to June 2018) protocol implementation. Demographics, injuries, and imaging utilization were extracted. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients cleared with clinical exam, and the proportion undergoing x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance image. The secondary outcome was the estimated difference in imaging charges based on the annual reduction in radiographic studies. During the study 359 children were evaluated for CSIs (248 pre-SP, 111 post-SP). Patients were similar with respect to age, injury severity score, and mechanism of injury. Protocol adherence was 87.4%. The prevalence of CSI was similar in the preprotocol and postprotocol cohorts (2.8% vs. 1.8%, P=0.567). Children treated after protocol implementation were significantly more likely to be cleared by clinical exam (15.3% vs. 43.2%, P<0.001). Significantly fewer children had x-rays (70.2% vs. 55.0%, P=0.005) and computed tomography scans (14.5% vs. 5.4%, P=0.013) in the postprotocol period. There was no difference in the utilization of magnetic resonance image (6.9% vs. 7.2%, P=0.904) or the proportion of children discharged with a cervical collar (10.1% vs. 12.6%, P=0.476). No patients in either group were found to have a previously undiagnosed injury at follow-up. The reduction in radiographic studies translates to an estimated annual reduction in imaging charges of $396,476. The PCSCWG protocol for evaluating CSIs reduced the number of radiographic studies performed and estimated imaging charges while reliably identifying CSIs.

Cervical Spine Dysfunction Following Pediatric Sports-Related Head Trauma.

To examine the prevalence of cervical spine injuries among children and adolescents referred with suspected and diagnosed sports-related concussion (SRC); and evaluate the effect of cervical spine dysfunction (CSD) on physician-documented clinical recovery following SRC. A multidisciplinary pediatric concussion program. A total of 266 patients (6-19 years) referred with suspected SRC. A retrospective cohort study. CSD defined as neurological symptoms localized to the cervical spine or the presence of neck pain, headache, or dizziness and abnormal cervical spine examination findings; physician-documented clinical recovery. One patient was diagnosed with a T1 compression fracture. Of the 246 patients diagnosed with SRC, 80 (32.5%) met the clinical criteria for CSD including 4 patients with central cord neuropraxia and 1 with a spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA). Excluding patients with central cord neuropraxia OR SCIWORA, patients with SRC with CSD took longer to achieve physician-documented clinical recovery (28.5 days vs 17 days, P < .0001) and were 3.95 times more likely to experience delayed physician-documented clinical recovery (>4 weeks postinjury) compared with those without CSD. Patients with suspected and diagnosed SRC can present with a wide spectrum of coincident cervical spine injuries. Cervical spine dysfunction may be a risk factor for delayed clinical recovery.

Elderly patients in Japan are susceptible to cervical spine injury: a database search study

Background: The aim of the present study was to elucidate the prevalence of cervical spine injury and its age distribution, and the causes and mortality rate in Japan using the Japan Trauma Data Bank. Methods: Patients coded as having a cervical spine injury were extracted from the Japan Trauma Data Bank from 2004 to 2013, which consisted of a total of 152,722 patients. The number of patients, their age distribution and causes of injury were analyzed amongst the patients with Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) coding associated with cervical spine injuries. Next, we extracted data for patients with an AIS coding of cervical spine injuries as a main disease, excluding patients with multiple trauma. We compared the mortality rate between aged and non-aged patients. Results: The total number of patients with an AIS code of cervical spine injuries was 12,116. The peak age range for cervical injury was 60–69 years. The most common causes of cervical spine injuries were falls from a height and traffic accidents. The number of patients with an AIS code of cervical spine injuries as a main disease was 8982. The total number of patients who died from a cervical spine injury was 668. Mortality rate tended to be higher in the older patients. Conclusions: The present results showed that the peak age range for cervical injury was 60–69 years. The mortality rate tended to be higher in patients over 70 years old.

Prospective observational research on the clinical profile and outcome analysis among a cohort of patients sustaining traumatic cervical spine and cord injury in a peripheral tertiary spine care centre in Nepal

Background: In developing nations like Nepal, spinal cord injury has multispectral consequences for both the patient and their family members. It has the tendency to cripple and handicap the patients, and burn out their caretakers, both physically and mentally. Furthermore, the centralization of health care with only a handful of dedicated rehabilitation centers throughout Nepal further places patients into disarray. This study was carried out as a pilot study to determine the modes of injury, age groups affected, clinical profiles and patterns of injury sustained, as well as the efficacy of managing a subset of patients, who have sustained cervical spine and cord injuries. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study comprising of 163 patients enrolled over a period of three years that were managed in the spine unit of College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, Nepal. Results: Road traffic accidents were implicated in 51% of these patients. 65% of them were in the age group of 30-39 years. Traumatic subluxation occurred in 73 patients with maximum involvement of the C4/5 region (28.76%). Good outcome was seen in patients with ASIA ‘C’ and ‘D’ with 55% of patients showed improvement from ‘C’ to ‘D’ and 95% of patients showed improvement from ‘D’ to ‘E’ at 1 year follow up. The overall mortality in the patients undergoing operative interventions was only 1.98%. Conclusions: The prevalence of cervical spine injuries in the outreach area is still significant. The outcome of managing these patients, even in the context of a resource limited setup in a spine unit outside the capital city of a developing nation, can be as equally as effective and efficient compared to the outcome from a well-equipped and dedicated spine unit elsewhere.

Prospective observational research on the clinical profile and outcome analysis among a cohort of patients sustaining traumatic cervical spine and cord injury in a peripheral tertiary spine care centre in Nepal.

Background: In developing nations like Nepal, spinal cord injury has multispectral consequences for both the patient and their family members. It has the tendency to cripple and handicap the patients, and burn out their caretakers, both physically and mentally. Furthermore, the centralization of health care with only a handful of dedicated rehabilitation centers throughout Nepal further places patients into disarray. This study was carried out as a pilot study to determine the modes of injury, age groups affected, clinical profiles and patterns of injury sustained, as well as the efficacy of managing a subset of patients, who have sustained cervical spine and cord injuries. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study comprising of 163 patients enrolled over a period of three years that were managed in the spine unit of College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, Nepal. Results: Road traffic accidents were implicated in 51% of these patients. 65% of them were in the age group of 30-39 years. Traumatic subluxation occurred in 73 patients with maximum involvement of the C4/5 region (28.76%). Good outcome was seen in patients with ASIA 'C' and 'D' with 55% of patients showed improvement from 'C' to 'D' and 95% of patients showed improvement from 'D' to 'E' at 1 year follow up. The overall mortality in the patients undergoing operative interventions was only 1.98%. Conclusions: The prevalence of cervical spine injuries in the outreach area is still significant. The outcome of managing these patients, even in the context of a resource limited setup in a spine unit outside the capital city of a developing nation, can be as equally as effective and efficient compared to the outcome from a well-equipped and dedicated spine unit elsewhere.

332 The Prevalence of Cervical Spine Injuries in Patients With Persistent Midline Tenderness in Low Mechanism Trauma Despite Initially Negative Computed Tomography

332 The Prevalence of Cervical Spine Injuries in Patients With Persistent Midline Tenderness in Low Mechanism Trauma Despite Initially Negative Computed Tomography

Usefulness of MRI detection of cervical spine and brain injuries in the evaluation of abusive head trauma

In the evaluation of children younger than 3 years with intracranial hemorrhage it can be difficult to determine whether the cause of hemorrhage was traumatic, and if so, whether abusive head trauma (AHT) is a possibility. Cervical spine MRI is not a routine part of the nationally recommended imaging workup for children with suspected abusive head trauma. There is increasing evidence that spinal injuries are found at autopsy or MRI in abused children. However the prevalence of cervical spine injuries in children evaluated for abusive head trauma is unknown. We sought to determine both the incidence and the spectrum of cervical spine and brain injuries in children being evaluated for possible abusive head trauma. We also examined the relationship between cervical and brain MRI findings and selected study outcome categories. This study is a 3-year retrospective review of children evaluated for abusive head trauma. Inclusion criteria were: children with head trauma seen at our institution between 2008 and 2010, age younger than 36 months, availability of diagnostic-quality brain and cervical spine MRI, and child abuse team involvement because abusive head trauma was a possibility. A child abuse pediatrician and pediatric radiologists, all with board certification, were involved in data collection, image interpretation and data analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata v12.1. The study included 74 children (43 boys, 31 girls) with a mean age of 164 days (range, 20-679days). Study outcomes were categorized as: n = 26 children with accidental head trauma, n = 38 with abusive head trauma (n = 18 presumptive AHT, n = 20 suspicious for AHT), and n = 10 with undefined head trauma. We found cervical spine injuries in 27/74 (36%) children. Most cervical spine injuries were ligamentous injuries. One child had intrathecal spinal blood and two had spinal cord edema; all three of these children had ligamentous injury. MRI signs of cervical injury did not show a statistically significant relationship with a study outcome of abusive head trauma or help discriminate between accidental and abusive head trauma. Of the 30 children with supratentorial brain injury, 16 (53%) had a bilateral hypoxic-ischemic pattern. There was a statistically significant relationship between bilateral hypoxic-ischemic brain injury pattern and abusive head trauma (P < 0.05). In addition, the majority (81%) of children with bilateral hypoxic-ischemic brain injuries had cervical injuries. Although detection of cervical spine injuries by MRI does not discriminate between accidental and abusive head trauma, it can help to distinguish a traumatic from non-traumatic intracranial subdural hemorrhage. Cervical MRI should be considered in children with acute intracranial bleeds and otherwise non-contributory history, physical examination and ophthalmological findings. There is a statistically significant relationship between diffuse hypoxic-ischemic brain injury patterns and abusive head trauma. The high incidence of cervical injuries in children with hypoxic-ischemic injuries suggests a causal relationship. Overall, increased utilization of brain and spine MRI in children being evaluated for abusive head trauma can be helpful.

The Prevalence of Cervical Spine Injury, Head Injury, or Both with Isolated and Multiple Craniomaxillofacial Fractures

The Prevalence of Cervical Spine Injury, Head Injury, or Both with Isolated and Multiple Craniomaxillofacial Fractures

The Prevalence of Cervical Spine Injury, Head Injury, or Both with Isolated and Multiple Craniomaxillofacial Fractures

Several studies have reported the relationship among craniomaxillofacial fractures, cervical spine injuries, and head injuries with varying results. Life-threatening injuries to the head and cervical spine with devastating consequences cannot be missed by reconstructive surgeons during evaluation of facial trauma. The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence of cervical spine injuries and/or head injuries with isolated and multiple craniomaxillofacial fractures at trauma centers across the United States. The study was a retrospective chart review of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes from the National Trauma Data Bank between the years 2002 and 2006. This included data on over 1.3 million trauma patients from the United States and Puerto Rico. In the setting of an isolated mandible, nasal, orbital floor, malar/maxilla, or frontal/parietal bone fracture, cervical spine injury ranged from 4.9 to 8.0 percent, head injury ranged from 28.7 to 79.9 percent, and concomitant cervical spine and head injury was present in 2.8 to 5.8 percent. In the setting of two or more facial fractures, the prevalence of cervical spine injury ranged from 7.0 to 10.8 percent. The prevalence of head injury ranged from 65.5 to 88.7 percent, and the prevalence of concomitant cervical spine and head injury ranged from 5.8 to 10.1 percent. This article represents the most accurate description of the prevalence of cervical spine and/or head injury with craniomaxillofacial fracture at trauma centers in the United States.

Prevalence of cervical spine injury in infants with head trauma

The incidence, type, and severity of pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) are related to age and mechanism of injury. In this study, the authors assessed the prevalence of CSIs in infants with head trauma treated in their institution. The authors reviewed the medical records of children younger than 1 year of age who presented to The Children's Hospital with head injuries between January 1993 and December 2007. They excluded infants with head injuries resulting from motor vehicle accidents and known falls from heights greater than 10 ft. For each patient, collected data included age, cause of injury, diagnosis, discharge disposition, and outcome. Relevant imaging data were reviewed, and when appropriate, autopsy reports were also reviewed. Nine hundred five infants with head trauma and without a major mechanism/cause were identified. Their mean age was 4.3 months. Of the 905 patients, only 2 cases of CSI were detected, giving a prevalence of 0.2%. The mechanism of injury in these 2 patients was nonaccidental trauma (NAT). The study revealed a very low prevalence of CSIs in infants with head trauma (0.2%). Routine cervical spine imaging in these infants, therefore, appears to have low diagnostic yield. The mechanism of head injury was NAT in the 2 patients who sustained an associated CSI. This supports the need for more stringent cervical spine imaging criteria for the infant with suspected NAT.

Detected and overlooked cervical spine injury among comatose trauma patients: from the Pennsylvania trauma outcomes study

A rule for identifying patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who are at exceptionally low risk of cervical spine injury might be clinically useful. The goal in this study was to research case records to determine whether such a rule would be practicable. The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study database was used to find patients with TBI in whom Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores at admission were 8 or less. Cases of cervical spine injury were identified from diagnostic codes. Associations between these injuries and a variety of clinical variables were tested using chi-square analysis. The probability of a cervical spine injury in these patients was modeled by logistic regression. Decision tree models were constructed and statistical determinants of overlooked cervical spine injury were examined. The prevalence of cervical spine injury among 41,142 cases of TBI was 8%. The mechanism of injury, presence of thoracolumbosacral (TLS) spinal, limb and/or facial fracture, patient age, GCS score at admission, and the presence of hypotension were all factors associated with cervical spine injury. These were incorporated into the following logistic regression model: probability of cervical spine injury = 1/(1 + exp[4.030 - 0.417*mechanism - 0.264*age - 0.678*TLS - 0.299*limb + 0.218*GCS score - 0.231*hypotension - 0.157*facial]). This model yielded a rule for clearance of 28% of cases, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%. Decision tree analysis yielded an easily stated rule for clearance of 24% of cases, with an NPV of 98.2%. The prevalence of overlooked cervical spine injury among all patients with severe TBI was 0.3%; the prevalence of overlooked cervical spine injury among patients in whom it was later diagnosed was 3.9%. Overlooked cervical spine injury was less common among patients with associated TLS fractures (odds ratio 0.453, 95% confidence interval 0.245-0.837). No acceptable rule for relaxation of vigilance in the search for cervical spine injury among patients with severe TBI has been identified. Levels of provider vigilance and consequent rates of overlooked cervical spine injury can be affected by environmental cues and presumably by other behavioral and organizational factors.

Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma

Study objective: A decision instrument based on 5 clinical criteria has been shown to be highly sensitive in selecting patients who require cervical spine imaging after blunt trauma, while simultaneously reducing overall imaging. We examine the performance of this instrument in the elderly and explore some of the common features of geriatric cervical spine injury (CSI). Methods: The National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted at 21 geographically diverse centers. We analyzed the performance of the NEXUS decision instrument among patients at least 65 years of age. Results: The study group consisted of 2,943 (8.6%) geriatric patients, representing 8.6% of the entire NEXUS sample. The rate of CSI was twice as great in these patients as it was in nongeriatric patients (4.59% versus 2.19%). Odontoid fractures were particularly common in geriatric patients, accounting for 20% of geriatric fractures compared with 5% of nongeriatric fractures. The frequency of patients meeting NEXUS criteria was similar in the 2 groups, with 14% of geriatric patients and 12.5% of nongeriatric patient classified as low risk. CSI occurred in only 2 low-risk geriatric patients, and these patients' injuries met our preset definition of a clinically insignificant injury. The sensitivity of the NEXUS decision instrument for clinically significant injury in the geriatric group was therefore 100% (95% confidence interval 97.1% to 100%). Conclusion: The prevalence of CSI, and especially odontoid fracture, is relatively increased among geriatric patients with blunt trauma. The NEXUS decision instrument can be applied safely to these patients, with an expected reduction in cervical imaging comparable with that achieved in nongeriatric patients. [Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:287-293.]

Prevalence of cervical spine injuries in patients with facial trauma

Prevalence of cervical spine injuries in patients with facial trauma

Prevalence of cervical spine injuries in patients with facial trauma.

Injuries to the spine may accompany facial trauma. By using a large computerized database the goal of this case control study was to assess the association between facial and cervical spine injuries among patients sustaining facial trauma. During a period of 4 years (1995 to 1998) 3083 patients, 10 years or older, with facial injuries were admitted to the University Hospital of Innsbruck's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for facial trauma. Records were analyzed for cause of injury, age and gender distribution, frequency and type of injury, and frequency of cervical spine injuries in relation to facial trauma and concomitant injuries. Two hundred six (6.7%) of these patients had experienced a concomitant cervical spine injury (case group). All other patients (2877) were assigned to the control group of facial trauma only. Facial trauma patients with concomitant cervical spine injuries were significantly older (mean age, 42 vs 34 years); no difference existed for the female/male ratio of 30:70. Sports trauma was the main cause of facial trauma in the control group (37.4%), yet traffic accidents accounted for 43.7% of combined facial and cervical spine injuries in the case group. Central mid face fractures dominated in the case group and lateral mid face fractures in the control group. In the case group cervical spine fractures and dislocations occurred in 19.2%. None of them showed evidence of paralysis. Concomitant brain injuries occurred in 21.6% of the case group and 8.8% of the control group. For patients sustaining facial trauma, logistic regression analysis revealed reduced risks for additional cervical spine injuries in younger patients, female patients, absence of brain injury, and in patients with facial soft tissue lesions alone (58.2%) or dental trauma alone (77.5%). The results of this study underline the importance of proper clinical and computed tomographic evaluation in cases of facial fractures for recognition of additional cervical spine trauma. Detection of cervical spine trauma can be missed, especially when pain or symptoms from other parts of the body dominate. The typical patient with concomitant neck and facial trauma is male, 40 years old, and usually involved in a traffic accident.