Prevalence Of Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity Research Articles

Prevalence and One-year Outcome of Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity in Unexplained Syncope: A Prospective Cohort Study from South India

BackgroundCarotid sinus syndrome accounts for one third of patients who presents with unexplained syncope. Prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) in Indians has not been studied till now. ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence and associations of CSH in symptomatic patients above 50 years and to study its prognostic significance pertaining to sudden cardiac death, syncope, recurrent pre syncope and falls on 1 year follow up. MethodsPatients above 50 years who presented with unexplained syncope, recurrent syncope or falls were considered cases and those without these symptoms were considered as controls. All the patients underwent carotid sinus massage and their responses noted. All symptomatic patients were followed up and observed for events like sudden cardiac death, syncope, recurrent pre syncope and falls during 1 year follow up. Patients with recurrent syncope and predominant cardioinhibitory syncope were advised permanent pacemaker implantation. ResultsA total of 252 patients were screened, 130 patients constituted cases and 49 patients constituted controls. CSH was demonstrable in 32% (n = 42) of cases as compared to 8% (n = 4) in controls (p < 0.001). Cardioinhibitory response was the predominant response (88%, n = 38) followed by mixed response (12%, n = 4). CSH was associated with advancing age, male gender (93%, n = 39, p < 0.001) and history of smoking (63%, n = 27, p = 0.009). Composite outcomes of sudden cardiac death, syncope, recurrent pre syncope and falls were significantly higher in patients with symptomatic CSH than in those without it (45%, n = 16 vs. 6.8%, n = 6; p < 0.001). ConclusionsIn conclusion, the prevalence of CSH in patients above 50 yrs with unexplained syncope was high in our population. Patients with CSH and baseline symptoms developed recurrent syncope during follow up. Carotid sinus massage should be a part of routine examination protocol for unexplained syncope.

Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity is Common in Patients Presenting with Hip Fracture and Unexplained Falls

We tried to determine the prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) in patients with hip fractures with and without a clear history of an accidental fall. We studied 51 patients hospitalized for a hip fracture and 51 matched controls from our outpatients department. All patients were subjected to a carotid sinus massage in the supine and upright position. Patients were categorized in accidental (Group A) and unexplained (Group B) fallers. Six of 33 (18.2%) patients in Group A and 12 of 18 (66.7%) patients in Group B (P < 0.001) had a positive response to the carotid sinus massage. Nine controls (17.6%) also demonstrated CSH. Patients in Group B were older (A: 75.5 +/- 8.5 years vs B: 80.1 +/- 5.9 years, P =0.029) and were more likely to have a history of unexplained falls or syncope in the past (A: 0% vs B: 66.7%, P < 0.0001) than individuals in group A. Vasodepressor/mixed forms accounted for the majority of CSH responses in Group B (75%). When compared with the control group, CSH was still more common in Group B (B: 66.7% vs control: 17.6%, P < 0.0001) but not in Group A (A: 18.2% vs control: 17.6%, P =1.000). The prevalence of CSH is increased in elderly patients with hip fractures, only in those who present with an unexplained fall and report a history of syncope or unexplained falls in the past. The vasodepressor/mixed forms account for the majority of CSH responses in the group of unexplained fallers.

Determinants of a positive response to carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt testing

Background Orthostatic hypotension (OH) and carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) are common causes of syncope in older people. The aim of this study was to determine if patient's age, sex and presenting symptoms influence the result of carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt testing. Methods Retrospective analysis of the database and reports was carried out between 1995 and 2006 at a tertiary referral centre. Patient's age, sex, presenting symptoms and test result were examined. Presenting symptoms were classified as syncope, falls or dizzy spells. Results Of the 1583 tests reported, OH was present in 402 patients (25.4%), of whom 175 (11.1%) were symptomatic. 188 of 1464 (12.8%) patients undergoing carotid sinus massage had evidence of CSH, of which 156 were symptomatic. Male patients were significantly more likely to have symptomatic CSH than female patients (odds ratio 2.28, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.04, p < 0.01). There were non-significant trends to increased diagnosis of symptomatic OH with increasing age, male sex and referral with syncope. There were non-significant trends to increased diagnosis of symptomatic CSH with increasing age and referral with syncope. Conclusion Male sex, increasing age and being referred with syncope were all associated with an increased likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of either OH or CSH. The overall prevalence of CSH was lower than in previous studies, which may reflect different patient populations.

Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity in Asymptomatic Older Persons

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is the most commonly reported cause of falls and syncope in older persons. Recent guidelines recommend 5 to 10 seconds of carotid sinus massage in supine and upright positions with beat-to-beat monitoring. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity in (1) an unselected community sample of older people and (2) a subsample with no history of syncope, dizziness, or falls using recently standardized diagnostic criteria. One thousand individuals older than 65 years were randomly sampled from a single general practice register; 272 participants underwent supine and upright carotid sinus massage with continuous heart rate and phasic blood pressure monitoring. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was defined as asystole of 3 seconds or greater and/or a drop in systolic blood pressure of 50 mm Hg or greater. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was present in 107 individuals (39%); 24% had asystole of 3 seconds or greater during carotid sinus massage; and 16% had symptoms (including syncope) with carotid sinus hypersensitivity. Age (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.09) and male sex (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence intervals, 1.04-2.82) were the only predictors of carotid sinus hypersensitivity. In 80 previously asymptomatic individuals, carotid sinus hypersensitivity was present in 28 (35%) and accompanied by symptoms in 10. The 95th percentile for carotid sinus massage response was 7.3 seconds' asystole and a 77-mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is common in older persons, even those with no history of syncope, dizziness, or falls. The finding of a hypersensitive response should not necessarily preclude further investigation for other causes of syncope.

Carotid sinus syndrome is common in dementia with Lewy bodies and correlates with deep white matter lesions

Background: Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) is a common cause of syncope in older persons. There appears to be a high prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) in patients with dementia...

Presence of a carotid bruit in adults with unexplained or recurrent falls: implications for carotid sinus massage.

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is a common cardiovascular cause of unexplained or recurrent falls in older adults. Effective treatment is available once carotid sinus hypersensitivity is identified. Carotid sinus massage is the only practical method for achieving a diagnosis. Carotid sinus massage is contraindicated if a carotid bruit is present. To determine the prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity in adults presenting with unexplained or recurrent falls and a carotid bruit. Prospective consecutive cohort study. Accident and Emergency department and regional syncope and falls facility. Accident and Emergency patients aged 50 years or over with unexplained or recurrent falls and a carotid bruit. 1) Carotid doppler ultrasound to identify significant stenosis (> or = 50%). 2) Carotid sinus massage (with electrocardiographic and phasic blood pressure monitoring) was performed supine and possibly upright. Consecutive adults with unexplained or recurrent falls were screened for carotid bruits. Those with a carotid bruit were referred for carotid Doppler ultrasound and stratified for further investigation depending on presence and degree of underlying carotid artery stenosis. Carotid sinus massage was performed at least supine in those with up to moderate stenosis (50-69%) in either internal or common carotid artery. Diagnosis of carotid sinus hypersensitivity. We identified 1682 subjects with unexplained or recurrent falls of whom 179 (11%) had a carotid bruit, 167 underwent ultrasound, 31% had a stenosis > or = 50% (20% > or = 70%) in either internal or common carotid artery. A bruit was associated with significant ipsilateral stenosis in 25% and contralateral silent stenosis in a further 5%. Carotid sinus massage was performed in 121 subjects who were suitable (15 with moderate carotid artery stenosis). Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was found in 41 (34%) subjects (4 with moderate stenosis). No serious complications occurred following carotid sinus massage. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is a possible attributable cause of symptoms in a third of subjects with unexplained or recurrent falls and carotid bruits. Only a small number have severe carotid artery stenosis. Ultrasound will identify high-risk subjects and facilitate accurate diagnosis with carotid sinus massage in the majority.

Carotid sinus hypersensitivity is common in older patients presenting to an accident and emergency department with unexplained falls.

To determine the prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity and orthostatic hypotension in older patients with non-accidental falls attending an accident and emergency department. A prospective case-control non-randomized study. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews, physical examination and neurocardiovascular investigations. We recruited cases and controls from an inner-city accident and emergency department. 26 consecutive patients presenting to accident and emergency with non-accidental falls and 54 controls matched for age, sex and cognitive function presenting to the same department either because of an accidental fall or a reason other than falling. MAIN VARIABLES MEASURED: Detailed history and clinical evaluation, including postural phasic blood pressure measurements, heart rate and blood pressure responses to supine and upright carotid sinus stimulation. Orthostatic blood pressure responses did not differ between groups. The heart rate and blood pressure responses to carotid sinus massage were abnormal in patients with non-accidental falls compared with controls (P=0.002). Asystolic responses were present in 12 (46%) of 26 cases and seven (13%) of 54 controls. Loss of consciousness occurred during carotid sinus massage in seven (27%) of the cases, all of whom had asystole, and in none of the controls. Almost half of the cognitively normal older patients attending accident and emergency with non-accidental falls have carotid sinus hypersensitivity, emphasizing that a post-fall intervention strategy should include carotid sinus studies.

Prevalence of Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity (CSH) in Older Attendee's to Accident and Emergency (A&amp;E) With Falls

Prevalence of Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity (CSH) in Older Attendee's to Accident and Emergency (A&amp;E) With Falls

Prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) in older attendee's to accident and emergency (A&E) with falls

Prevalence of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) in older attendee's to accident and emergency (A&E) with falls