Pretreatment Platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio Research Articles

The prognostic role of pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PurposeIn this study, we retrospectively investigated the prognostic role of pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (ESCC) treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 338 patients with pathologically diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma that underwent concurrent chemo-radiotherapy from January 2013 to December 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe result showed that the thresholds for NLR and PLR were 2.47 and 136.0 by receiver operating characteristic curve. High NLR and PLR were both associated with tumor length (P < 0.05). High NLR and PLR were significantly associated with poor PFS and OS. Multivariate analyses identified NLR, PLR and TNM stage were independent risk factors for PFS and OS.ConclusionsWe show that the pre-treatment NLR and PLR may serve as prognostic indicators for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.

A Correlation Evaluation Between the Peripheral Blood Index and the Prognosis of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Camrelizumab.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between peripheral blood indices and the efficacy and prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with camrelizumab. We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients who received camrelizumab for advanced ESCC at the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang City between July 2020 and June 2022. The study included examination of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the systemic inflammation index (SII), the lymph-to-monocytes ratio (LMR), the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to explore the link existing between peripheral blood and the efficacy of treatment. Determination of potential prognostic factors for Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) using Cox regression analysis. The nomogram model was developed based on the results of the Cox multivariate analysis. Patients were divided into three groups according to the reduction in LDH and LDL levels before treatment, and the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the three groups were compared and ROC curves for LDH combined with PLR were plotted. Lower LDH (OR=6.237, 95% CI: 1.625-23.944) were independently associated with disease control rates(DCR). LDH was independently correlated with PFS (HR: 0.227 95% CI: 0.099-0.517). LDH and PLR were independently linked to OS. The C index of the nomogram model is 0.819, indicating good predictive performance. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve suggested better OS in patients with reduced pretreatment LDH and PLR. The area under the ROC curve showed that the LDH index combined with the PLR index predicts patient survival better than the index alone. LDH combined with PLR predicted prognosis in patients with ESCC treated with camrelizumab.

Prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization and tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus immune checkpoints inhibitors.

To investigate the prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and tailored tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). Ninety-eight patients from May 2018 to January 2022 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed and the corresponding Youden index was used to determine the optimal PLR cut-off. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) of patients were evaluated based on the PLR cut-off. The factors affecting survival were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The PLR cut-off was 98.89. There were 49 patients in the low pretreatment PLR group (PLR ≤ 98.89) and 49 patients in the high PLR group (PLR > 98.89). Patients with low pretreatment PLR had significantly longer median OS (25.7 months vs 16.1 months; P < 0.001) and PFS (14.9 months vs 10.2 months; P < 0.001) than those with high pretreatment PLR. The multivariate analysis revealed that ALT, tumor size, and PLR are risk factors affecting OS. The three independent factors affecting PFS are tumor size, AFP, and PLR. The AEs were tolerable and manageable. The low pretreatment PLR (PLR ≤ 98.89) was an independent protective factor for the survival outcomes of patients in this study. PLR was helpful for clinicians to predict the prognosis and identify the patients with uHCC who were most likely to benefit from TACE + TKIs + ICIs.

The predictive value of systemic immune-inflammatory markers before and after treatment for pathological complete response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study of 1994 patients.

Systemic immune-inflammatory markers have a certain predictive role in pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer. However, there is a lack of research exploring the predictive value of markers after treatment. This retrospective study collected data from 1994 breast cancer patients who underwent NAT. Relevant clinical and pathological characteristics were included, and pre- and post-treatment complete blood cell counts were evaluated to calculate four systemic immune-inflammatory markers: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The optimal cutoff values for these markers were determined using ROC curves, and patients were classified into high-value and low-value groups based on these cutoff values. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to analyze factors influencing pCR. The factors with independent predictive value were used to construct a nomogram. After NAT, 383 (19.2%) patients achieved pCR. The area under the ROC curve is generally larger for post-treatment markers compared to pre-treatment markers. Pre-treatment NLR and PLR, as well as post-treatment LMR and SII, were identified as independent predictive factors for pCR, along with Ki-67, clinical tumor stage, clinical lymph node stage, molecular subtype, and clinical response. Higher pre-NLR (OR = 1.320; 95% CI 1.016-1.716; P = 0.038), pre-PLR (OR = 1.474; 95% CI 1.058-2.052; P = 0.022), post-LMR (OR = 1.532; 95% CI 1.175-1.996; P = 0.002), and lower post-SII (OR = 0.596; 95% CI 0.429-0.827; P = 0.002) are associated with a higher likelihood of achieving pCR. The established nomogram had a good predictive performance with an area under the ROC curve of 0.754 (95% CI 0.674-0.835). Both pre- and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammatory markers have a significant predictive role in achieving pCR after NAT in breast cancer patients. Indeed, it is possible that post-treatment markers have stronger predictive ability compared to pre-treatment markers.

Pretreatment PLR Is Preferable to NLR and LMR as a Predictor in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Bladder Cancer.

Advanced bladder cancer (BC) is associated with an inflammatory nature and poor prognosis Inflammatory biomarkers are potential predictors in BC. We conducted a study to assess the prognostic value of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in advanced bladder cancer. A total of 226-patients with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) were included. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for comparison. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine NLR, PLR, and LMR association with OS. Our patients' median progression-free survival and OS were 12.18 and 15.54 months, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed cut-off values for our chosen inflammatory markers. The patients with high NLR or PLR had inferior median OS compared to their counterparts with lower ratios for both (NLR: 22.51 vs. 9.84 months, respectively, p≤0.001; PLR: 17.68 vs. 14.08 months, respectively, p=0.08). Meanwhile, patients with low LMR had inferior median OS compared to patients with higher LMR (LMR: 20.14 months vs. 10.55 months, respectively, p<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression analysis identified a high PLR as an independent predictive factor of worse OS (hazard ratio=2.774, 95% confidence interval=1.486-5.178, p=0.001) but not NLR or LMR. PLR, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, and serum LDH levels, but not NLR and LMR, may function as independent predictors in patients with advanced BC prior to systemic treatment.

Prognostic significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

ObjectivePlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), known as a key systemic inflammatory parameter, has been proved to be associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer (BC); however, the results remain controversial....

Early changes of platelet‑lymphocyte ratio correlate with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and predict pathological complete response in breast cancer.

Markers with inflammatory properties, such as the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have been documented as potential indicators for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in cases of breast cancer. However, whether early changes of PLR (ΔPLR) during NACT can predict pCR has not been reported. A total of 257 breast cancer patients who underwent NACT were retrospectively analyzed. PLR was calculated by evaluating the complete blood cell counts prior to NACT and following two cycles of NACT. The analysis focused on the association between changes in PLR and the response to chemotherapy, as well as the association with pCR. Patients who stayed in or changed to the low PLR level subgroup after two cycles of NACT exhibited a superior response to chemotherapy, in contrast to those who stayed in or changed to the high PLR level subgroup. Of the 257 patients, 75 (29.1%) achieved a pCR after NACT. In the multivariate analysis, there was a significant association between ΔPLR and pCR, whereas pre-treatment and post-treatment PLR did not show any significant association. In multivariate analysis, patients who had a ΔPLR <0 had a notably higher rate of pCR compared with patients with a ΔPLR ≥0. It was concluded that ΔPLR, rather than pre-treatment or post-treatment PLR, is associated with pCR. This suggested that the early changes of PLR after two cycles of NACT might serve as a more accurate predictor for chemotherapy response and pCR in breast cancer.

Inflammation index predicts radiation-induced lung injury and prognosis in lung tumors treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.

To investigate the effect of inflammation-based indexes in predicting radiation pneumonitis (RP) and prognosis in lung tumor patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The data of one hundred and seventy-two patients with 272 lung lesions from November 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment hematological indexes including platelet count, neutrophil count, and lymphocyte count were collected before treatment. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was established to predict the RP and overall survival of patients, and the Youden index was calculated to determine the cutoff values of SII, NLR, and PLR before radiotherapy. Pretreatment SII, NLR, and PLR could predict RP in lung tumor patients treated with SBRT, the optimal cutoff values of SII, NLR, and PLR were 355.38, 2.04, and 141.09, respectively. Pretreatment PLR could predict survival and the optimal cutoff value of PLR was 166.83, patients with a PLR > 166.83 predict worse overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001). The 1-year and 2-year OS for patients with a PLR ≤ 166.83 were 96.3% and 82.4%, while for those with a PLR > 166.83 were 82.0% and 58.5%, respectively. In lung tumor patients treated with SBRT, pretreatment SII, NLR, and PLR can effectively predict RP and a higher PLR predicts poor OS. These inflammation-based indexes could serve as reliable and convenient predictors to guide treatment for physicians in clinical practice.

248. SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY MARKERS AS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A MEXICAN PERSPECTIVE

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer (EC) represents the eighth most commonly diagnosed cancer, and sixth cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Several studies have demonstrated an association between systemic inflammation, anti-cancer immunity, and poor oncological outcomes in patients with EC. Biomarkers including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may reflect the balance between pro-cancer inflammation and anti-cancer immune response and have prognostic implications in Mexican esophageal cancer patients. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of all EC patients from 2011–2022 was performed. Baseline pre-treatment NLR, LMR and PLR was collected. The date of last follow-up or death was ascertained from medical records. ROC curves were used to calculate cut-off values for NLR and PLR, while the median-value was used for LMR. Serum albumin of &amp;lt;3.5 g/dL was considered malnutrition. Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and Cox regression (multivariate) were performed to evaluate survival against prognostic factors. Results 498 patients were included during the study period, 80.1% men and 19.9% women, median age 60 (±12.2) years old. Adenocarcinoma (49.8%) was the most common histological subtype, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (31.7%). Clinical stage included: I (3%), IIA-B (11.8%), III (37.6%), IVA (2.6%), and IVB (44.2%). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was the predominant initial therapy (50.4%), followed by chemotherapy (41.7%). ROC curves revealed the following cut-off value: 2.92 for NLR, 174 for IPL, and 3.5 for LMR. In the univariate analysis, four prognostic factors were significant for overall survival (NLR, PLR, LMR, albumin) (Table 1), while in the multivariate analysis only NLR and albumin remained independent factors for survival (Table 2). Conclusion In our population, low NLR and high albumin can be considered independent prognostic markers in patients with esophageal cancer. These common pretreatment biomarkers can serve to identify patients with good prognostic factors, contributing to an improved consent process and therapeutic decision making. Further research should focus on more accurate cut-off values for survival prognostication.

Age at diagnosis, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as prognoticators in pediatric sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma

BackgroundThe relationship between pretreatment blood parameters and clinical outcomes of patients with pediatric sinonasal rhabdomyosarcomas has not been described. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic factors and certain laboratory parameters that affect the survival and long-term survival in pediatric sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma. MethodsMedical records of pediatric sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma cases who were treated and followed up between 2004 and 2020 in Hacettepe University were retrospectively reviewed. The relationship between clinical features, laboratory parameters and survival was investigated. ResultsAge at the time of diagnosis, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) had significant effect on survival (p < 0,004, p < 0,037, p < 0,016, respectively). Survival rate was higher in patients younger than 10 (≤10 years of age) at the time of diagnosis (p = 0,004), patients with a NLR of 2 or below (≤2) (p = 0,037), and patients with a PLR of 150 or below (≤150) (p = 0,016). ≤ 10 years of age at the time of diagnosis was found as an independent prognostic factor affecting survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5382; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1476- 19,623; P = 0,011). In addition, a pretreatment PLR of 150 or below (≤150) was found as another independent prognostic factor that affects survival (hazard ratio [HR], 4386; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1161- 16,567; P = 0,029). ConclusionsPreoperative NLR and PLR may be important parameters to predict the prognosis of pediatric sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma. Further research with larger patient groups are warranted.

Trends in Systemic Inflammatory Reaction (SIR) during Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Chemotherapy in Women Suffering from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most fatal gynaecological malignancy treated with cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant taxane-platinum-based chemotherapy. It has been shown that the pretreatment systemic inflammatory reaction (SIR) in women with OC can be evaluated using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic inflammatory index (SII), depending on the stage of disease, and has prognostic value for overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in NLR, LMR, PLR and SII during chemotherapy. A total of 107 women with EOC (23 with type I and 84 with type II tumours) were included in a retrospective single-centre analysis. The Kologomorov-Smirnoff, Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman analysis of variance tests were used for data analysis, and a p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A significant decrease in NLR, PLR and SII but not LMR was observed during adjuvant treatment. Pretreatment NLR, PLR and SII were dependent on disease stage and tumour grade; however, this association was lost during therapy. Additionally, strong and positive mutual correlations between NLR, LMR, PLR and SII were sustained during the whole course of chemotherapy. During first-line adjuvant chemotherapy in women with EOC, a decrease in SIR is confirmed.

Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is characterized by diagnosis at an advanced stage, low rate of operability and poor survival. Therefore, there is a need for a biomarker in NSCLC patients to predict the likely outcome and to accurately stratify the patients in terms of the most appropriate treatment modality. To evaluate prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in NSCLC. A total of 124 NSCLC patients (mean ± standard deviation age: 60.7 ± 9.3 years, 94.4% were males) were included in this retrospective study. Data were retrieved from the hospital records. The association of NLR and PLR with clinicopathological factors and overall survival was analyzed. One-year, 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 59.2%, 32.0%, and 16.2%, respectively. Median duration of survival was shorter in patient groups with elevated NLR and PLR. Five-year survival rate was quite lower in patient groups with elevated NLR and PLR. Hazard rate (HR) for mortality was 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.61, P = .005) for NLR ≥ 3 over NLR < 3. HR was 1.64 (95%CI: 1.11-2.42, P = .013) for PLR ≥ 150 over PLR < 150. Cox-regression analysis revealed that, when adjusted for other independent predictors of survival, NLR and PLR still remain significant predictors of poorer survival. Our findings indicate that elevated pretreatment NLR and PLR are associated with advanced disease and poor survival in NSCLC patients, NLR and PLR values are correlated with each other.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as prognostic biomarkers in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Background: The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains controversial. Methods: Using pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs, we assessed the correlation of pre-treatment NLR and PLR with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in LS-SCLC. Publication bias was assessed by Begg's and Egger's tests. Results: Ten studies were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that pre-treatment high NLR was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.80) and PFS (HR: 1.69) in LS-SCLC patients. High pre-treatment PLR was also associated with shorter OS (HR: 1.52) and PFS (HR: 1.39) in LS-SCLC patients. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that high pre-treatment NLR or PLR may be negatively related to OS and PFS in LS-SCLC.

Systemic inflammation markers ratio in heavily pretreated NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

e21188 Background: Inflammatory cells have important effects on tumor development. Systemicinflammation markers can be used as prognostic factors. Numerous studiesshown that high pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and/or platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels are potential prognostic predictors for poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy. Methods: We performed a cohort study of patients with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC treated with nivolumab monotherapy in second‐line or further‐line treatment in Clinical hospital centre Zagreb. Pre-treatment NLR and PLR were calculated by division of neutrophils and platelets by lymphocytes measured in peripheral blood. Patients were categorized in two sub-groups according to their NLR and PLR values. In previous meta-analyses it was suggested that significant cut-off value of NLR is NLR &lt; 5 and ≥5 and PLR &lt; 160 and ≥160. We analysed PFS and OS. Results: Overall 105 patients diagnosed with NSCLC were treated with nivolumab. The patients were enrolled from March 2017 until October 2017 and were observed them for disease progression and death until June 1st 2020. Most of the patients were male (71; 67.6%) with median age 60.3 years (36-77). Our patients were selected on the basis of good performance status, so most of them had ECOG PS 0 and 1 (103; 98.1%). Therapy was applied mostly in the second and third line (67; 64%), but even up to seventh line (2; 1.9%). Median duration of therapy was 34.5 weeks (2-149), while median number of doses was 17 (1-69).The median PFS was 7.2 months (95% CI 4.53-9.86). Regardless of previous treatment the mOS was 16.1 months (95% CI 11.26-20.93).We observed median value of NLR 4.08 (IQR 2.44-5.84) and PLR 200 (IQR 127.49-284.72). Patients with low PLR had better overall survival compared to patients with low PLR (mOS 20.5 months vs 11.9 months; 95%CI 14.07-26.92 vs 7.35-16.44; p = 0.039). The same was not as clear in mPFS, tendency of better mPFS was toward low PLR, but it did not reach statistical difference (low PLR mPFS 9.1 months vs high PLR mPFS 6.1 months; p = 0.49).Patients with low NLR had significantly better overall survival compared to patients with high NLR (mOS low NLR 18.2 vs high NLR 10.1 months; 95%CI 13.07-23.32 vs 6.04-14.15; p = 0.014). Again, the statistical significance was not reached for progression-free survival (mPFS low NLR 8.3 months vs high NLR 5.8 months; 95%CI 4.81-11.78 vs 2.91-8.68; p = 0.214). Conclusions: Here, we demonstrated that the presence of indicators of systemic inflammation suchas high NLR and high PLR are associated with poor overall survival, but not withprogression-free survival in pre‐treated NSCLC patients who received nivolumabtreatment. The limitation of our study is the lack of a randomizedcontrol and small sample size. The main strength of our study is that it is real-worldeveryday clinical setting.

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Restenosis after Interventions for Lower Extremity Arteriosclerosis Obliterans.

To investigate the association between the pretreatment systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and restenosis after interventions for lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO). We retrospectively evaluated 309 patients with ASO who underwent endovascular interventions between January 2018 and December 2021. Pretreatment inflammatory markers, including the SII, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were collected. The logistic regression model was used to determine the associations between these inflammatory markers and restenosis. Clinical manifestations, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and quality of life after intervention also were compared. The pretreatment SII (p < 0.001), NLR (p < 0.001), PLR (p < 0.001), SIRI (p = 0.002), AISI (p < 0.001), and CRP (p = 0.036) were significantly higher in patients with restenosis than in those without restenosis. Among the four markers, SII had the highest area under the curve (AUC) in predicting restenosis (SII vs. NLR vs. PLR vs. SIRI vs. AISI vs. CRP: 0.715 vs. 0.689 vs. 0.695 vs. 0.643 vs. 0.691 vs. 0.596). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pretreatment SII was the only independent factor for restenosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.102; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.155-14.567; p = 0.029). Moreover, a lower SII was associated with significantly better improvements in clinical manifestations (Rutherford classification 1-2: 67.5% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.038) and ABI (median: 0.29 vs. 0.22; p = 0.029), together with better quality of life (p < 0.05 for physical functioning, social functioning, pain, and mental health). The pretreatment SII is an independent predictor of restenosis after interventions in patients with lower extremity ASO, providing more accurate prognosis prediction than other inflammatory markers.

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with arterial chemoembolization on short-term clinical outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to explore the short-term efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with arterial chemoembolization for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 203 patients with LAGC who received neoadjuvant therapy from June 2019 to December 2021. The patients were divided into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with arterial chemoembolization group (combined group, n = 102) and a neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (conventional group, n = 101). The adverse events of chemotherapy, postoperative complications and pathological complete response (pCR) rate were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the potential factors affecting pCR.ResultsA total of 78.8% of the patients were in clinical stage III before neoadjuvant therapy. A total of 52.2% of the patients underwent surgery after receiving two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. There were 21.2% patients with ≥ grade 3 (CTCAE 4.0) adverse events of chemotherapy and 11.3% patients with Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ grade 3 postoperative complications. Compared with the conventional group, the combination group did not experience an increase in the adverse events of chemotherapy or postoperative complications. The pCR rate in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (16.7% vs. 4.95%, P = 0.012). The multivariate analysis showed that arterial chemoembolization, pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and pre-treatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were independent factors affecting pCR.ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with arterial chemoembolization contributed to improving the pCR rate of LAGC patients. Arterial chemoembolization, pre-treatment NLR and pre-treatment PLR were also predictors of pCR.

Prognostic Significance of the Post-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Pharyngeal Cancers Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Even though the pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are well-established prognosticators in various cancers including head and neck cancers, there have been relatively few studies on the clinical significance of the post-treatment values. This study aimed to investigate the changes in NLR and PLR after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and to evaluate their prognostic significance in pharyngeal cancers. This study was retrospectively conducted on 461 consecutive patients with primary pharyngeal cancer who had received definitive CCRT. Blood test results before and after CCRT were obtained, and the pre- and post-treatment NLR and PLR were calculated. Patient prognosis was evaluated based on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). After CCRT, the NLR increased from 2.01 (interquartile range (IQR), 1.53-2.62) to 2.69 (IQR, 1.93-3.81), and the PLR increased from 118.84 (IQR, 92.61-151.63) to 193.19 (IQR, 146.28-262.46). Along with high pre-treatment NLR and high pre-treatment PLR, high post-treatment NLR was also significantly associated with worse OS and RFS (p = 0.013 and p = 0.026). In addition, patients with a high ΔNLR (i.e., the difference between pre- and post-treatment NLRs) had significantly worse OS and RFS (p = 0.013 and p = 0.026). However, only a high pre-treatment NLR (hazard ratio (HR), 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-4.08; p = 0.014), age (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.14-4.08; p = 0.018), and stage IV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.15-3.89; p = 0.017) were independent prognostic factors for OS in the multivariate analysis. In patients with pharyngeal cancers, following CCRT, the NLR and PLR increased significantly from pre-treatment values. Like the pre-treatment NLR and PLR, a high post-treatment NLR and a significant increase in NLR were also associated with poor prognosis. Further prospective studies are required to prove the independent significance of the post-treatment NLR and PLR.

The Pre-Treatment Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor for Loco-Regional Control in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Chronic inflammatory reactions have been proven to represent relevant mechanisms for the development and progression of cancer in numerous tumor entities. There is evidence that the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is associated with the prognostic outcome. In rectal cancer, the prognostic role of this parameter has not yet been conclusively clarified. The aim of this study was to further clarify the prognostic significance of the pre-treatment PLR in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In the present study, 603 patients with LARC, who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and subsequent surgical resection between 2004 and 2019, were retrospectively evaluated. The influence of clinico-pathological and laboratory factors on locoregional control (LC), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated. In univariate analyses, high PLR was significantly associated with worse LC (p = 0.017) and OS (p = 0.008). In multivariate analyses, the PLR remained an independent parameter for the LC (HR = 1.005, 95% CI: 1.000-1.009, p = 0.050). Pre-treatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HR: 1.005 95% CI:1.002-1.008; p = 0.001) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (HR: 1.006, 95% CI:1.003-1.009; p < 0.001) were independent predictors for MFS; additionally, age (HR: 1.052, 95% CI:1.023-1.081; p < 0.001), LDH (HR: 1.003, 95% CI:1.000-1.007; p = 0.029) and CEA (HR: 1.006, 95% CI:1.003-1.009; p < 0.001) independently predicted OS. Pre-treatment PLR before nCRT is an independent prognostic factor for LC in LARC, which could be used to further individualize tumor treatment.

The prognostic role of the preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio in laryngeal cancer.

Background: In recent years, several studies have investigated the relationship between platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and the prognosis of patients with laryngeal cancer, but the results remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment PLR in patients with laryngeal cancer. Methods: Up to July 2023, we searched PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases to collect relevant articles evaluating the relationship between PLR and the prognosis of laryngeal cancer. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effect-model. Results: A total of 14 included studies involving 3220 patients with laryngeal cancer were included. The combined results suggested that elevated PLR was associated with poorer overall survival (HR = 2.21, 95% CI, 1.67 - 2.93, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.76-3.66, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.87, 95% CI,1.45 - 2.42, p < 0.001), and disease-free survival (HR = 1.46, 95% CI, 1.08-1.98, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis further confirmed that pretreatment PLR was an independent predictor of OS in laryngeal cancer patients. Conclusion: Higher pretreatment PLR is strongly related to poor prognosis of laryngeal cancer patients. This indicates that PLR has the potential to serve as a valuable biomarker for predicting the prognosis of laryngeal cancer. However, further validations in large prospective cohorts are necessary to confirm its clinical utility and reliability.

The Clinical Impact of the Pretreatment Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a promising prognostic marker in some malignancies. The present study evaluated the clinical impact of the PLR in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection. This study included 258 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters between the high- and low-PLR statuses were analyzed. The overall survival (OS) stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed using a pretreatment PLR of 150. When comparing the patient backgrounds between the high-PLR (PLR≥150) and low-PLR (PLR<150) groups, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly higher at 70.8% and 60.4%, respectively, for the high-PLR group than at 83.6% and 79.7%, respectively, for the low-PLR group. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the OS showed that the PLR was a significant prognostic factor. In addition, when comparing the first recurrence sites, there were significant differences in peritoneal recurrence. The PLR is a significant risk factor for gastric cancer, making it a promising prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer.