Pretransplant Peritoneal Dialysis Research Articles

#2573 Effect of pre-transplant dialysis modalities on delayed graft function

Abstract Background and Aims Kidney transplantation represents the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease patients. Benefits and disadvantages of different pre-transplant dialysis modalities and the effects on post-transplant outcomes remain unclear, but many authors identify peritoneal dialysis (PD) such a “bridge” versus renal transplantation. Method We analyze a consecutive series of 249 renal transplanted patients (mean age 48 ± 11 years, 67% males) between June 1998 and February 2016 with a low prevalence of comorbidities (diabetes 2%, hypertension 31%, previous cardiovascular events 2%). The median follow-up was 136 months [interquartile range (IR) 91-197 months]. The pre-transplant treatment was hemodialysis (HD) in 215 patients (86%) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the remaining 34 patients (14%). The majority of patients received a cadaveric donor organ (219 patients, 88%). Results Delayed Graft Function (DGF) was registered in 151 patients (61%). Analyzing pre-transplant dialysis treatment, 15 patients about 34 (44%) on pre-transplant PD had DGF vs 136/215 (63%) on pre-transplant HD treatment (P = 0.03). Remarkable PD patients were older (48 ± 12 years) than HD patients (44 ± 11 years), but this difference did not rise statistical significance (P = 0.09); similarly the prevalence of living donors were higher (13%) in the group of HD patients respect the group of PD patients (9%, P = 0.53). In a longitudinal analysis the last estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was lower in patients with DGF (44, IR 19-66 ml/min/1,73 m2) vs patients without DGF (48, IR 35-73 ml/min/1,73 m2, P = 0.04), but no substantial differences was noted at the end of observation in eGFR between the two groups of patients (HD, eGFR 45, IR 25-68 ml/min/1,73 m2 vs PD eGFR 46, IR 24-67 ml/min/1,73 m2). Conclusion Results of this study confirm that PD treatment can be considered an optimal “bridge” for renal transplantation probably because peculiar characteristic of this dialysis modality (such us long term preserved diuresis and residual renal function respect HD patients) impacts positively on recovery of renal function. Further study need to clarify these controversial points.

Optimizing Arteriovenous Fistula Care in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Complex Task.

Optimizing Arteriovenous Fistula Care in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Complex Task.

Association Between Pretransplant Dialysis Modality and Kidney Transplant Outcomes

The benefits and disadvantages of different pretransplant dialysis modalities and their posttransplant outcomes remain unclear in contemporary kidney transplant care. To summarize the available evidence of the association of different pretransplant dialysis modalities, including hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis (PD), with posttransplant outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, and gray literature were searched from inception to March 18, 2022 (updated to April 1, 2022), for relevant studies and with no language restrictions. Randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized observational (case-control and cohort) studies that investigated the association between pretransplant dialysis modality and posttransplant outcomes regardless of age or donor sources (living or deceased) were abstracted independently by 2 reviewers. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guidelines, 2 reviewers independently extracted relevant information using a standardized approach. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled adjusted hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio and 95% CI. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, overall graft failure, death-censored graft failure, and delayed graft function. Secondary outcomes included acute rejection, graft vessel thrombosis, oliguria, de novo heart failure, and new-onset diabetes after transplant. The study analyzed 26 nonrandomized studies (1 case-control and 25 cohort), including 269 715 patients (mean recipient age range, 14.5-67.0 years; reported proportions of female individuals, 29.4%-66.9%) whose outcomes associated with pretransplant hemodialysis vs pretransplant PD were compared. No significant difference, with very low certainty of evidence, was observed between pretransplant PD and all-cause mortality (13 studies; n = 221 815; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84-1.01]; P = .08) as well as death-censored graft failure (5 studies; n = 96 439; HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.85-1.14]; P = .81). However, pretransplant PD was associated with a lower risk for overall graft failure (10 studies; n = 209 287; HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]; P = .02; very low certainty of evidence) and delayed graft function (6 studies; n = 47 118; odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.70-0.76]; P < .001; low certainty of evidence). Secondary outcomes were inconclusive due to few studies with available data. Results of the study suggest that pretransplant PD is a preferred dialysis modality option during the transition to kidney transplant. Future studies are warranted to address shared decision-making between health care professionals, patients, and caregivers as well as patient preferences.

The Role of Peritoneal Dialysis in Different Phases of Kidney Transplantation.

The utilization of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been increasing in the past decade owing to various government initiatives and recognition of benefits such as better preservation of residual renal function, quality of life, and lower cost. The Advancing American Kidney Health initiative aims to increase the utilization of home therapies such as PD and kidney transplantation to treat end stage kidney disease (ESKD). A natural consequence of this development is that more patients will receive PD, and many will eventually undergo kidney transplantation. Therefore, it is important to understand the effect of pretransplant PD on posttransplant outcomes such as delayed graft function (DGF), rejection, thrombosis, graft, and patient survival. Furthermore, some of these patients may develop DGF, which raises the question of the utility of PD during DGF and its risks. Although transplant is the best renal replacement therapy option, it is not everlasting, and many transplant recipients must go on dialysis after allograft failure. Can PD be a good option for these patients? This is another critical question. Furthermore, a significant proportion of nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients develop ESKD. Is PD feasible in this group? In this review, we try to address all of these questions in the light of available evidence.

Impact of pre-transplant dialysis modality on kidney transplant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

For end-stage renal disease (ESRD), patients receiving kidney transplantation, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) are both appropriate modes of pre-transplant dialysis. The aim of this review is to assess the impact of pre-transplant PD compared to HD on kidney transplant outcomes in ESRD patients. A comprehensive search in digital databases, like PubMed, SCOPUS and EMBASE and a manual search were conducted to identify cohort studies comparing the kidney transplant outcomes of both pre-transplant dialysis modalities. The data were subjected to both qualitative and quantitative analysis. A meta-analysis was carried out to calculate the effect estimate for patient survival, graft survival and delayed graft function, death-censored graft survival, acute rejection-free graft survival, graft vessel thrombosis, urological complications, surgical complications, any infections, and onset of diabetes after transplantation. The qualities of the included studies were judged by the New-castle Ottawa scale. The overall patient survival is shown to be better with patients who underwent pre-transplant PD compared to HD with OR 1.34 95% CI [1.11, 1.61], p = 0.002. Delayed graft function was found to be highly associated with HD compared to PD with OR 0.60 [0.52, 0.70], p<0.0001 with moderate heterogeneity (i2 = 48%). However, no difference was observed in terms of graft survival, complications, infections, and new onset of diabetes mellitus compared to patients undergoing pre-transplant HD. Within the limitations of the review, it can be concluded that ESRD patients undergoing pre-transplant PD were found to have better patient survival and lower incidence of delayed graft function.

Clinical Correlates and Outcomes of Dual Basiliximab and Antithymocyte Globulin Induction in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A National Study.

We used national transplant registry data to study clinical correlates and outcomes of single versus dual induction therapy in adult kidney-only transplant recipients in the United States (2005-2018). The risk of death and graft loss at 1 and 5 y, according to induction therapy type, was assessed using multivariate Cox regression analysis (adjusted hazard ratio with 95% upper and lower confidence limits [LCLaHRUCL]). Of the 157 351 recipients included in the study, 67% were treated with ATG alone, 29% were treated with IL2rAb alone, and 5% were treated with both. Compared with IL2rAb alone, the strongest correlates of dual induction included Black race, calculated panel reactive antibody ≥80%, prednisone-sparing maintenance immunosuppression, more recent transplant eras, longer cold ischemia time, and delayed graft function. Compared with ATG alone, dual induction was associated with an increased 5-y risk of death (aHR 1.071.151.23; P < 0.0001), death-censored graft failure (aHR 1.051.131.22; P < 0.05), and all-cause graft failure (aHR 1.061.121.18; P < 0.0001). Further research is needed to develop risk-prediction tools to further inform optimal, individualized induction protocols for kidney transplant recipients.

Practice patterns of dialysis access and outcomes in patients wait-listed early for kidney transplantation

BackgroundEarly kidney transplantation (KT) is the best option for patients with end-stage kidney disease, but little is known about dialysis access strategy in this context. We studied practice patterns of dialysis access and how they relate with outcomes in adults wait-listed early for KT according to the intended donor source.MethodsThis study from the REIN registry (2002–2014) included 9331 incident dialysis patients (age 18–69) wait-listed for KT before or by 6 months after starting dialysis: 8342 candidates for deceased-donor KT and 989 for living-donor KT. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) of KT and death associated with hemodialysis by catheter or peritoneal dialysis compared with arteriovenous (AV) access were estimated with Fine and Gray models.ResultsLiving-donor candidates used pretransplant peritoneal dialysis at rates similar to deceased-donor KT candidates, but had significantly more frequent catheter than AV access for hemodialysis (adjusted OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.09–1.43). Over a median follow-up of 43 (IQR: 23–67) months, 6063 patients received transplants and 305 died before KT. Median duration of pretransplant dialysis was 15 (7–27) months for deceased-donor recipients and 9 (5–15) for living-donor recipients. Catheter use in deceased-donor candidates was associated with a lower SHR for KT (0.88, 95%CI 0.82–0.94) and a higher SHR for death (1.53, 95%CI 1.14–2.04). Only five deaths occurred in living-donor candidates, three of them with catheter use.ConclusionsPretransplant dialysis duration may be quite long even when planned with a living donor. Advantages from protecting these patients from AV fistula creation must be carefully evaluated against catheter-related risks.

Pulmonary complications within the first year after renal transplantation

Background The lungs are commonly involved after renal transplantation, with many complications, either infectious or noninfectious. The infectious complications significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors were involved, such as old age, smoking status, comorbid diseases, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis, cadaveric renal transplantation, heavy immunosuppression, and treatment of graft rejection. Aim To study the predisposing risk factors, etiologic factors, and the timeline of pulmonary complications within the first year after renal transplantation (either infectious or noninfectious complications). Patients and methods We conducted this prospective observational study in the Organ Transplant Center in Kuwait from March 2016 to October 2019. The kidney recipients were followed up for 1 year after transplantation. For suspected infectious pulmonary complications, the patients were subjected to blood, sputum, and or bronchoalveolar lavage within the first 24 h after admission; all samples were subjected to microbiological and serological examinations. Results We had 60 patients who developed postrenal transplant pulmonary complications. A total of 42 patients developed infectious pulmonary complications and 54 patients developed noninfectious complications. The most common infectious pulmonary complications were bacterial pneumonia (42 patients), opportunistic fungal infection (47 patients), and viral pneumonia (37 patients). The most common noninfectious pulmonary complications were pulmonary congestion (51 patients), pleural effusion (29 patients), and pulmonary embolism (16 patients). In the first 6 months, surgery-related complications and opportunistic fungal infection predominated owing to heavy immunosuppression. After 6 months, infections were due to community-acquired pathogens. The mortality rate was 38%. Bacterial pneumonia was the main cause of death (39%) followed by viral pneumonia (26%) and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (13%). Septic shock and respiratory failure were the leading causes of death. Conclusion Renal transplant was associated with infectious and noninfectious pulmonary complications. Infections were highly prevalent in the first year after transplantation. Old age, smoking status, comorbid diseases, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis, cadaveric renal transplantation, heavy immunosuppression, and treatment of graft rejection were the main risk factors for posttransplant pulmonary complications. Sepsis and respiratory failure represented the commonest causes of death.

Effects of pretransplant peritoneal vs hemodialysis modality on outcome of first kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death

BackgroundThe effect of pretransplant peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) modality on outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is debatable. We evaluated the outcomes these modalities in KT from donor after cardiac death (DCD).MethodsA cohort of 251 patients on HD, PD or pre-emptive who underwent first KT from DCD between January 2014 and December 2016 were prospectively analyzed to compare for outcomes on recovery of renal function, complications as well as patient and graft survival. The patients were followed till August 2017. Data on 104 HD and 98 PD were available for final comparative outcome analysis, 5 pre-emptive were analyzed as the control group.ResultsBoth HD and PD group patients were well matched for demographic and baseline characteristics. The follow-up period was 12.5 (3.0, 22.0) months in HD and 12.0 (6.0, 20.0) months in PD patients. Post-transplant renal functions between the two groups showed no differences. Among PD patients, 16 (16.3%) suffered delayed graft function, versus 19 (18.3%) in HD, with no statistical differences (p = 0.715). Complications of acute rejection, infections were comparable between the groups. The patient survival, graft survival and death-censored graft survival were similar for HD and PD after adjusting for other multiple risk factors.ConclusionsOur results indicate that outcome of first KT from DCD is not affected by pretransplant dialysis modality of PD or HD in aspects of recovery of renal function, complications as well as patient and graft survival.

A Comparison of Transplant Outcomes in Peritoneal and Hemodialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) have been considered the 2 standard pre-transplant dialysis modalities in patients awaiting kidney transplantation. However, the impact of pretransplant dialysis on the short- and long-term post-transplant outcomes remains controversial. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials for this review. Twelve studies were identified by strict screening for the meta-analysis. Results: We found that pretransplant PD patients had a significantly lower incidence of delayed graft function than HD patients, with an OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.72, p < 0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the incidence of acute rejection, OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.75-1.16). Pretransplant PD had a better 5-year patient survival rate than HD, with a hazard ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.95, p < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences in the graft survival rate (p = 0.08). Conclusions: We found that PD was a better choice of pretransplant dialysis modality than HD. Video Journal Club ‘Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco' at http://www.karger.com/?doi=446272.

Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis improves long-term survival of kidney transplant patients: a single-center observational study

Kidney transplantation is the best option for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in terms of survival and quality of life. These results can be influenced by the pretransplant dialysis modality. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the pretransplantation dialysis modality influences patient and allograft survival beyond 10 years and examine the potential risk factors associated with the outcomes. We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center clinical study that included 236 patients [118 undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 118 undergoing hemodialysis (HD)] who proceeded to transplantation during the period December 1990-2002. Donor and recipient data were collected from our hospital's clinical registries. The follow-up period extended to the patient's death, the loss of the allograft, or loss to follow-up. The end date of the study was set at March 2012. In the multivariate analysis, the long-term patient survival rate was higher for the PD group than for the HD group [HR = 2.62 (1.01-6.8); p = 0.04]; however, the allograft survival rate was not significantly different between the two groups [HR = 0.68 (0.41-1.10); p = 0.12]. Pretransplantation dialysis modality is associated with long-term patient survival, with outcomes favoring peritoneal dialysis over hemodialysis. However, the pretransplant dialysis modality does not influence long-term graft loss risk.

The Mode of Pretransplant Dialysis Does Not Affect Postrenal Transplant Outcomes in African Americans

Background. In previous reports with a majority of Caucasian patients, peritoneal dialysis (PD) before kidney transplantation has been associated with poor outcomes and higher rates of graft thrombosis and infectious complications than hemodialysis (HD). We report our experience on the outcomes of prerenal transplant peritoneal dialysis in predominantly (73%) African American patient population. Methods. A retrospective data analysis of 401 kidney transplants performed at our center from 2000 to 2006 was performed. Adult recipients with at least three months of pretransplant HD or PD were included. Results. There were 339 patients on HD and 62 patients on PD. There was no difference in graft (P = 0.51) and patient survival (P = 0.52) at 1, 3, and 5-years. Patients on HD were more likely to experience delayed graft function than PD (38.8% versus 17.7%, P < 0.005). There was no difference in the incidence of vascular thrombosis or posttransplant infectious complications. When only the African American patients in the two groups were compared, there were no differences in graft or patient survival. Conclusions. Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis is associated with excellent patient and renal allograft outcomes in African Americans and does not predispose them to an increased risk of infectious or thrombotic complications.

Dialysis Modality and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

The influence of pretransplant dialysis modality on post-transplant outcomes is not clear. This study examined associations of pretransplant dialysis modality with post-transplant outcomes in a large national cohort of kidney transplant recipients. Linking the 5-year patient data of a large dialysis organization to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, 12,416 hemodialysis and 2092 peritoneal dialysis patients who underwent first kidney transplantation were identified. Mortality or graft failure and delayed graft function risks were estimated by Cox regression (hazard ratio) and logistic regression (odds ratio), respectively. Recipients treated with peritoneal dialysis pretransplantation had lower (21.9/1000 patient-years [95% confidence interval: 18.1-26.5]) crude all-cause mortality rate than those recipients treated with hemodialysis (32.8/1000 patient-years [30.8-35.0]). Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis use was associated with 43% lower adjusted all-cause and 66% lower cardiovascular death. Furthermore, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis use was associated with 17% and 36% lower unadjusted death-censored graft failure and delayed graft function risk, respectively. However, after additional adjustment for relevant covariates, pretransplant peritoneal dialysis modality was not a significant predictor of death-censored graft failure delayed graft function, respectively. Similar trends were noted on analyses using a propensity score matched cohort of 2092 pairs of patients. Compared with hemodialysis, patients treated with peritoneal dialysis before transplantation had lower mortality but similar graft loss or delayed graft function. Confounding by residual selection bias cannot be ruled out.

Effect of Pretransplant Dialysis Modality and Duration on Long-Term Outcomes of Children Receiving Renal Transplants

Adults receiving preemptive renal transplants have better allograft survival. Our study investigated differences in graft and patient survival based on need for, and duration of, pretransplant dialysis in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Data on pediatric kidney transplants from January 1995 to December 2000 from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network were included. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine the effect of pretransplant dialysis on graft and patient survival. Of 3606 transplants, 28% were preemptive, 38% followed pretransplant hemodialysis (HD), and 34% peritoneal dialysis (PD). The 1-year acute rejection rate was lowest for the preemptive group (36%) compared with the HD (45.5%; P=0.0002) and PD (44.2%; P=0.0008) groups. On multivariable analysis, an increased relative risk of graft failure was seen with, among other variables, deceased donor transplantation and acute rejection within the first year, but not with pretransplant dialysis. When analyzed separately by donor source, pretransplant dialysis had no effect on graft survival for deceased donor graft recipients, whereas for living donor recipients, the use and duration of pretransplant HD adversely affected pediatric renal graft survival in a linear manner. No such effect was seen with pretransplant PD. There is a linear increase in the risk of graft failure with the use of and increasing duration of pretransplant HD for living donor grafts. This indicates another reason to minimize the need for and duration of pretransplant HD in children with chronic kidney disease.

Short‐term outcome of renal transplantation treated with pre‐transplant peritoneal dialysis

AbstractOBJECTIVEPre‐transplant dialysis has been reported to have an impact on the outcome in renal transplantation; however, it is still controversial. This study evaluated the short‐term outcome of pre‐transplant peritoneal dialysis (PD) in comparison to that of hemodialysis (HD).PATIENTS AND METHODSAll living donor kidney transplantations performed from January 2008 to April 2009 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to pre‐transplant dialysis, HD and PD. The recipient's age, duration of dialysis, acute rejection episodes, incidence of infection, serum creatinine level, and surgical complications were evaluated.RESULTSThe PD group was significantly younger and the duration of their dialysis was shorter. The creatinine level in the PD group was significantly lower than that in the HD group. Acute rejection proven by biopsy was seen in 4 of 36 patients in the HD group and in only 1 of 14 patients in the PD group. There was no difference in the incidence of infection between the 2 groups. There were no vessel complications in any patients, but there were a few urological complications in both groups. Delayed graft function resulting from intractable ascites occurred in 1 patient in the PD group.CONCLUSIONRenal transplantation in patients with pre‐transplant PD can be performed safely, although the development of ascites, the timing of removal of the PD catheter, and encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis may occur even after successful transplantation.

Factors affecting kidney‐transplant outcome in recipients with lupus nephritis

Factors associated with outcome in renal transplant recipients with lupus nephritis have not been studied. Using the data from the United States Renal Data System of patients transplanted between January 1, 1995 through December 31, 2002 (and followed through December 31, 2003) (n = 2882), we performed a retrospective analysis of factors associated with long-term death-censored graft survival and recipient survival. The number of pretransplant pregnancies incrementally increased the risk of graft failure [hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, p < 0.05] in the entire subgroup of females and in the subgroup of recipients aged 25-35 yr. Recipient and donor age had an association with both the risk of graft failure (HR 0.96, p < 0.001; HR 1.01, p < 0.005) and recipient death (HR 1.04, p < 0.001; HR 1.01, p < 0.05). Greater graft-failure risk accompanied increased recipient weight (HR 1.01, p < 0.001); African Americans compared with whites (HR 1.55, p < 0.001); greater Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.17, p < 0.05); and greater panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels (HR 1.06, p < 0.001). Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis as the predominant modality had an association with decreased risk of graft failure (HR 0.49, p < 0.001), while prior transplantation was associated with greater risk of graft failure and recipient death (HR 2.29, p < 0.001; HR 3.59, p < 0.001, respectively) compared with hemodialysis (HD). The number of matched human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antigens and living donors (HR 0.92, p < 0.05; HR 0.64, p < 0.001, respectively) was associated with decreased risk of graft failure. Increased risk of graft failure and recipient death was associated with nonuse of calcineurin inhibitors (HR 1.89, p < 0.005; HR 1.80, p < 0.005) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) (including mycophenolate mofetil and MPA) or azathioprine (HR 1.41, p < 0.05; HR 1.66, p < 0.01). Using both cyclosporine and tacrolimus was associated with increased risk of graft failure (HR 2.09, p < 0.05). Using MPA is associated with greater risk of recipient death compared with azathioprine (HR 1.47, p < 0.05). In renal transplant recipients with lupus nephritis, multiple pregnancies, multiple blood transfusions, greater comorbidity index, higher body weight, age and African American race of the donor or recipient, prior history of transplantation, greater PRA levels, lower level of HLA matching, deceased donors, and HD in pretransplant period have an association with increased risk of graft failure. Similarly, higher recipient and donor age, prior transplantations, and higher rate of pretransplant transfusions are associated with greater risk of recipient mortality. Using neither cyclosporine nor tacrolimus or using both (compared with tacrolimus) and neither MPA nor azathioprine (compared with azathioprine) was associated with increased risk of graft failure and recipient death. Using MPA is associated with greater risk of recipient death compared with azathioprine. Testing these results in a prospective study might provide important information for clinical practice.

Evolución del trasplante renal según la modalidad de diálisis previa: hemodiálisis frente a diálisis peritoneal

Background and aims Kidney transplantation is considered the treatment of choice in most patients with end-stage renal disease. Several studies have examined the effect of pretransplant dialysis modality on graft and patient survival. The results of these studies have sometimes been conflicting. Some studies show that peritoneal dialysis has been implicated as an etiological factor in acute rejection and graft arterial thrombosis, while others report that the incidence of delayed graft function is lower with peritoneal dialysis than with hemodialysis. The aim of the present study was to analyze the possible effect of pretransplant dialysis modality on the outcome of kidney transplantation. Patients and method All patients who underwent renal transplantation between 1990 and 2004 were included in this study. Results No differences were found in the incidence of acute rejection episodes, delayed graft function, or graft arterial thrombosis between patients on hemodialysis and those who received peritoneal dialysis. There were no significant differences in patient mortality and survival or graft survival between the two groups. Conclusion Although many studies have speculated that outcome after renal transplantation is worse in patients with pretransplant peritoneal dialysis, we conclude that this modality does not negatively influence short-term outcome in kidney transplantation.

Influence of pretransplant dialysis modality on the change of lymphocyte subset populations and acute rejection rates after renal transplantation.

The influence of dialysis modality on the acute rejection (AR) rate after renal transplantation is controversial. We investigated whether the pretransplant dialysis modality correlated with the lymphocyte subset populations and the incidence of AR after renal transplantation. Thirty-eight first living renal transplant recipients, consisting of 22 patients on pretransplant hemodialysis (HD) and 16 patients on pretransplant peritoneal dialysis (PD), were studied. Peripheral blood samples were taken on days -1 through 28 after transplantation, and the lymphocyte fractions were exposed to the monoclonal antibodies anti-CD3, CD19, CD4, CD8 and CD28 for a flow cytometer analysis. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the time of presumed AR episodes and on day 28 after transplantation. The PD patients had a higher frequency of AR (37.5% in PD vs 9.1% in HD patients, P = 0.034). In contrast, two HD patients showed graft loss at 18 and 30 months after transplantation. The increases of CD3, CD19, CD4 and CD4+ CD28+ cells in the PD patients occurred earlier than in the HD patients and the numbers of these cells in the PD group were higher than those in the HD between days 3-28 after transplantation, most significantly on day 7. These findings suggest that the PD patients with similar clinical characteristics could potentially have a higher immunocompetence and immune responsiveness associated with a higher rate of AR in the early stage of renal transplantation when compared with the HD patients.

Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis and graft thrombosis following pediatric kidney transplantation: a NAPRTCS report.

Graft thrombosis is a common cause of graft failure in pediatric renal transplantation. Several previous studies, including a North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) review of pretransplant dialysis status and graft outcomes, have described a potential correlation of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and graft thrombosis. This issue is of particular concern for pediatric transplant programs as more than 65% of children with end stage renal disease are treated with PD. We reviewed 7247 pediatric renal transplants performed between 1987 and 2001. Thrombosis was the cause of graft loss in 2.7% (199) of all the transplants performed. Among failed transplants, thrombosis was the third most common cause of graft loss in both index (11.6%) and subsequent transplants (14.5%). Thrombosis becomes the most common cause of graft failure (21%, 61/294) if one looks at transplants in the later cohort, from 1996 to 2001. This change is primarily because of a decrease in the incidence of acute rejection. In the PD group, 3.4% of all grafts were lost as a result of thrombosis. This compares with 1.9% in the hemodialysis group, 2.4% in the pre-emptive transplant group, and 4.1% among patients who received both dialysis modalities. There was a statistically significant difference in thrombosis failure risk in the different dialysis groups (p = 0.005) with those who received only peritoneal dialysis having the highest risk. Additional significant risk factors for graft thrombosis included; cadaver donor source (p < 0.001), cold ischemia time >24 h (p < 0.001), history of prior transplant (p < 0.001), donor age <6 yr (p < 0.001), and >5 pretransplant blood transfusions (p = 0.02). Using stepwise proportional hazards modeling, only pretransplant peritoneal dialysis, >24 h cold ischemia time, prior transplant, and donor age <6 yr were simultaneously associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. We conclude that pretransplant PD is associated with an increased risk of graft thrombosis. Special precautions should be undertaken in pediatric renal transplant patients who have received PD, especially infants and young children.

Complications Linked to Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis in Children after Kidney Transplantation: Experience of the Italian Registry of Pediatric Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis

Our objective was to evaluate the infectious complications of the post-transplant period attributable to the persistence of catheter and other complications when chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) was performed posttransplantation. The design was a retrospective study, and the setting was an Italian registry of pediatric chronic peritoneal dialysis. There were 86 pediatric renal transplants (9/86 from living related donors, 2/86 simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation for oxalosis). Six of 86 transplants were lost at follow-up. Mean age of the children (n = 80) at transplantation was 9.3 years (range:1.7–21 years). They had been on CPD for a mean period of 1.7 years (range: 0.2 -4.6 years). During CPD, 67 peritonitis episodes (80% related to exit-site and/or tunnel infections) were observed, with an incidence of peritonitis of one episode per 16 months CPD. The mean safe interval of peritonitis and/ or exit-site or tunnel infection was 208 days (range: 36 1897 days). The mean time of catheter removal was 80.3 days (range: 0 216 days) post-transplantation. During the first month post-transplantation, one episode of peritonitis secondary to a sepsis occurred in one child. No other episodes of peritonitis or exit-site and/or tunnel infections were observed. Two of 80 children returned to CPD (at four and at 12 months, respectively) because of persistent allograft failure. Furthermore, 12 patients were on CPD because of temporary graft failure. In all these patients the pretransplant peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter was utilized, with no complications. These data show that the persistence of the PD catheter after kidney transplantation has produced no infections or other complications. What is more, the catheter was safely utilized during acute rejection or primary allograft nonfunction.