Postsynaptic receptor cycling is a complicated cell biological process that is poorly understood. While it is clear that interfering with interactions between many of the dozens of proteins mediating exo- and endocytosis can disrupt synaptic function and plasticity, interpreting these results unambiguously will require a much more complete understanding of the role these proteins play in postsynaptic function. While proteins like NSF, synaptobrevin, and amphiphysin serve well-characterized roles in presynaptic vesicle cycling, little is currently known about the postsynaptic localization or function of these proteins. The unexpected finding that NSF interacts directly with AMPARs raises the possibility that other proteins involved in vesicle fusion or endocytosis may also serve dual functions as receptor chaperones, or may have other vital roles in maintaining the integrity of the PSD.While there is as yet no consensus on the rate of AMPAR cycling and the direct role of constitutive turnover in rapid forms of synaptic plasticity, it seems likely that regulated endo- and exocytosis will emerge as an important mechanism for rapidly influencing synaptic strength. It may turn out that constitutive AMPAR cycling is too slow to play a role in LTP and LTD (as suggested by half-life studies). On the other hand, long-term modulation of the relative rates of exo- and endocytosis could play an important role in homeostatic forms of plasticity such as synaptic scaling (14xO'Brien, R.J, Kambol, S, Ehlers, M.D, Rosen, K.R, Kischback, G.D, and Huganir, R.L. Neuron. 1998; 21: 1067–1078Abstract | Full Text | Full Text PDF | PubMed | Scopus (404)See all References, 19xTurrigiano, G.G, Leslie, K.L, Desai, N.S, Rutherford, L.C, and Nelson, S.B. Nature. 1998; 391: 892–895Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (1088)See all References, 18xTurrigiano, G.G and Nelson, S.B. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000; in pressSee all References), or activity-dependent or developmental changes in receptor localization (Craig 1998xCraig, A.M. Neuron. 1998; 21: 459–462Abstract | Full Text | Full Text PDF | PubMed | Scopus (87)See all ReferencesCraig 1998), that operate over a time scale of hours to days. Finally, it remains to be seen what role regulation of AMPAR binding proteins plays in both rapid and slow forms of central synaptic plasticity. It is not clear that inserting more receptors into the membrane is useful without the resources to trap those receptors at the synapse. It may very well turn out that producing a long-lasting change in receptor number at a synapse requires both delivery of more receptors to the membrane and an increased capacity to bind and immobilize those receptors.*E-mail: turrigiano@brandeis.edu.
Read full abstract