Pressure For Corporate Social Responsibility Research Articles

Data centre sustainability – Beyond energy efficiency

Data centres are large energy consumers, which have become more energy efficient in recent years due to increased awareness of opportunities, increasing energy costs and corporate social responsibility pressures. A lifecycle assessment approach identifies two other significant areas of impact: the embodied impact of IT equipment and mechanical and electrical plant, and the electricity source used in operational and embodied processes. Many data centre operators publicise their energy efficiency, some also report on their carbon footprint. However, there is a need for simple tools in order to help operators better understand and quantify the embodied impact and inform green procurement. Focussing purely on energy efficiency may cause a burden shift, e.g. by replacing equipment with more efficient equipment but increasing the embodied impact. The total environmental impact could remain the same/increase, but with the perception of a ‘greener’ data centre. Although currently there is limited data available for data centre life cycle assessments and the process is resource intensive, research has identified which factors significantly impact a facility’s environmental impact. This knowledge should be used in the design process and throughout the data centre lifecycle to minimise data centre environmental impact. Practical application: As the data centre industry continues to grow and its sustainability receives closer scrutiny, it is important to increase awareness of where its highest environment impacts lie and analyse the factors which influence this. This can help inform policy and decision-making to support the design and operation of data centres which are truly more sustainable. It is important that this research is not just theoretical but can translate into practical actions which can be implemented in a cost-effective manner for the benefit of everyone. The current focus in industry has been energy consumption and energy efficiency; many practices which were considered innovative a few years ago have now become standard best practice. It is time to examine which other areas should be prioritised for improvement.

Corporate Social Responsibility, resettlement, rehabilitation and community involvement in India

Subhasis Ray analyses how Indian corporations are reacting to increased pressure for corporate social responsibility.

Self-regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Business Case: Do they Work in Achieving Workplace Equality and Safety?

The political shift toward an economic liberalism in many developed market economies, emphasizing the importance of the marketplace rather than government intervention in the economy and society (Dorman, Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management: Perspectives on an International Development, 2000; Tombs, Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 3(1):24–25, 2005; Walters, Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 03(2):3–19, 2005), featured a prominent discourse centered on the need for business flexibility and competitiveness in a global economy (Dorman, 2000; Tombs, 2005). Alongside these developments was an increasing pressure for corporate social responsibility (CSR). The business case for CSR – that corporations would benefit from voluntarily being socially responsible – was increasingly promoted by governments and corporations as part of the justification for self-regulation. The aim of the article is to examine more closely the proposition that self-regulation is effective, with particular reference to the business case for workplace equality and safety. Based on a comprehensive literature review and documentary analysis, it was found that current predominant management discourse and practice focusing on diversity and safety management systems (OHSMS) resonate well with a government and corporate preference for the business case and self-regulation. However, the centrality of individual rather than organizational factors in diversity and OHSMS means that systemic discrimination and inherent workplace hazards are downplayed, making it less likely that employers will initiate structural remedies needed for real change. Thus, reliance on the business case in the argument for self-regulation is problematic. In terms of government policy and management practice, the business case needs to be supplemented by strong, proactive legislation, and worker involvement.

Global Corporate Social Responsibility Pressures and the Failure to Develop Universal Rules to Govern Investors and States

Global Corporate Social Responsibility Pressures and the Failure to Develop Universal Rules to Govern Investors and States