Pressure-based Cardiac Output Research Articles

Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output and stroke volume measurements using electrical impedance tomography with invasive methods in a swine model.

Pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) has been used as a clinical standard for cardiac output (CO) measurements on humans. On animals, however, an ultrasonic flow sensor (UFS) placed around the ascending aorta or pulmonary artery can measure CO and stroke volume (SV) more accurately. The objective of this paper is to compare CO and SV measurements using a noninvasive electrical impedance tomography (EIT) device and three invasive devices using UFS, PAC-CCO (continuous CO) and arterial pressure-based CO (APCO). Thirty-two pigs were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated. A UFS was placed around the pulmonary artery through thoracotomy in 11 of them, while the EIT, PAC-CCO and APCO devices were used on all of them. Afterload and contractility were changed pharmacologically, while preload was changed through bleeding and injection of fluid or blood. Twenty-three pigs completed the experiment. Among 23, the UFS was used on 7 pigs around the pulmonary artery. The percentage error (PE) between COUFS and COEIT was 26.1%, and the 10-min concordance was 92.5%. Between SVUFS and SVEIT, the PE was 24.8%, and the 10-min concordance was 94.2%. On analyzing the data from all 23 pigs, the PE between time-delay-adjusted COPAC-CCO and COEIT was 34.6%, and the 10-min concordance was 81.1%. Our results suggest that the performance of the EIT device in measuring dynamic changes of CO and SV on mechanically-ventilated pigs under different cardiac preload, afterload and contractility conditions is at least comparable to that of the PAC-CCO device. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate the utility of the EIT device as a noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring tool.

Mock circulatory loop generated database for dynamic characterization of pressure-based cardiac output monitoring systems

Pulse contour cardiac output monitoring systems allow real-time and continuous estimation of hemodynamic variables such as cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume variation (SVV) by analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms. However, evaluating the performance of CO monitoring systems to measure the small variations in these variables sometimes used to guide fluid therapy is a challenge due to limitations in clinical reference methods. We developed a non-clinical database as a tool for assessing the dynamic attributes of pressure-based CO monitoring systems, including CO response time and CO and SVV resolutions. We developed a mock circulation loop (MCL) that can simulate rapid changes in different parameters, such as CO and SVV. The MCL was configured to simulate three different states (normovolemic, cardiogenic shock, and hyperdynamic) representing a range of flow and pressure conditions. For each state, we simulated stepwise changes in the MCL flow and collected datasets for characterizing pressure-based CO systems. Nine datasets were generated that contain hours of peripheral pressure, central flow and pressure waveforms. The MCL-generated database is provided open access as a tool for evaluating dynamic characteristics of pressure-based CO algorithms and systems in detecting variations in CO and SVV indices. In an example application of the database, a CO response time of 10 s, CO and SVV resolutions with lower and upper limits of (−9.1%, 8.4%) and (−5.0%, 3.8%), respectively, were determined for a pressure-based CO benchtop system. This tool will support a more comprehensive assessment of pressure-based CO monitoring systems and algorithms.

Accuracy of Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring (esCCO) Using Pulse Wave Transit Time (PWTT) Compared to Arterial Pressure-based CO (APCO) Measurement during Major Surgeries.

BackgroundPulse wave transit time is a novel method of estimating continuous cardiac output (esCCO). Since there are not many studies evaluating esCCO, we compared it with arterial pressure based cardiac output (APCO) method (FloTrac).MethodsIn this prospective single-center observational study, we included 50 adult patients planned to undergo supramajor oncosurgeries, where major blood loss and extensive fluid shifts were expected. Cardiac output (CO) measurements were obtained by both methods at five distinct time points, giving us 250 paired readings of stroke volume index (SVI) and cardiac index (CI). We analyzed these readings using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman plots, along with other appropriate statistical tests.ResultsThere was significant correlation between CI and SVI measured by the esCCO and APCO. Bland–Altman plot analysis for CI showed a bias of −0.44 L/minute/m2, precision of 0.74, and the limits of agreement of −1.89 and +1.01, while the percentage error was 46.29%. Bland–Altman analysis for SVI showed a bias −5.07 mL with a precision of 9.36, and the limits of agreement to be −23.4 to +13.28. The percentage error was 46.56%.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that esCCO tended to underestimate the CI to a large degree, particularly while estimating the cardiac output in the lower range. We found that the limits of agreement between two methods were wide, which are not likely to be clinically acceptable. Further studies with larger number of data points, obtained in a similar subset of patients, for cardiac output measurement in the perioperative period will certainly help determine if pulse wave transit time (PWTT) is here to stay (CTRI No.: CTRI/2019/08/020543).How to cite this articleJoshi M, Rathod R, Bhosale SJ, Kulkarni AP. Accuracy of Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring (esCCO) Using Pulse Wave Transit Time (PWTT) Compared to Arterial Pressure-based CO (APCO) Measurement during Major Surgeries. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):496–500.

Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to detect stroke volume index: Estimated continuous cardiac output estimated by modified pulse wave transit time and measured by an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.

Estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO), a non-invasive technique for continuously measuring cardiac output (CO), is based on modified pulse wave transit time, which is determined by pulse oximetry and electrocardiography. We examined the ability of esCCO to detect stroke volume index (SVI) and changes in SVI compared with currently available arterial waveform analysis methods. We retrospectively reanalysed 15 of the cases from our previous study on esCCO measurement. SVI was calculated using an esCCO system, measured using the arterial pressure-based CO (APCO) method, and compared with a corresponding intermittent bolus thermodilution CO (ICO) method. Percentage error measurement and statistical methods, including concordance analysis and polar plot analysis, were performed. The difference in the SVI values between esCCO and ICO was -3.0 ± 8.8 ml (percentage error, 33.5%). The mean angular bias was 0.8 and the radial limits of agreement were ± 27.3. The difference in the SVI values between APCO and ICO was 0.9 ± 11.2 ml (percentage error, 42.6%). The mean angular bias was -6.8 and the radial limits of agreement were ± 44.1. This study demonstrated that the accuracy, precision, and dynamic trend of esCCO are better than those of APCO.

Arterial pressure based cardiac output in the septic patient

In the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock inotropes, vasopressors and vasodilatation drugs are needed to improve cardiac performance and microcirculation. The cardiac output is used to measure the cardiac performance. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-based cardiac output measuring is often used but major complications can occur. A cornerstone and also a quality indicator of intensive care medicine is the prevention of complications within the intensive care. Alternative methods to measure cardiac output are developed to minimize complications. Until now, every new introduced method has been shown to have limitations. One of the latest alternatives is arterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) measuring.