Prespecified Endpoint Research Articles

Imaging predictors of adverse prognosis in fabry disease cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Cardiac involvement represents the main cause of death in patients with Fabry disease (FD). Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) have an established diagnostic role, but their prognostic value remains unresolved. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the prognostic implications of imaging parameters in FD. Methods PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published from inception through to October 1, 2023. Full-length original papers including FD patients undergoing baseline imaging assessment and clinical follow-up were selected. Pre-defined study outcomes were a cardiovascular endpoint and a composite clinical endpoint. A meta-analysis of the studies investigating the effect of single imaging parameters on a pre-specified cardiovascular endpoint and a separate analysis on a pre-specified composite clinical endpoint were performed to obtain the pooled estimates for the association between the imaging parameters and the study outcome. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Results Thirteen studies including 1,399 FD patients (44.8% males) were selected. At pooled analysis, late gadolinium enhancement (HR 4.39; 95% CI 2.5-7.71), left atrium volume indexed (HR 1.02 per ml/m2; 95% CI 1.01-1.04), E/e’ (HR 1.14 per unit increase; 95% CI 1.08-1.21), left ventricular (LV) mass indexed (HR 1.014 per mg/m2; 95% CI 1.006-1.023), maximum LV wall thickness (HR 1.19 per mm, 95% CI 1.04-1.36), LV-global longitudinal strain (HR 1.2 per unit increase; 95% CI 1.2-1.27), were significantly associated with the cardiovascular endpoint, whereas T1-mapping (p=0.115) and LV-ejection fraction (p=0.305) were not. T1-mapping was associated with the composite endpoint (HR 0.986 per msec increase; 95% CI 0.976-0.997). Meta-regression analysis did not show any significant interaction between each of the potential effect modifiers. Conclusion This meta-analysis demonstrates a robust prognostic value regarding several imaging parameters in FD, specifically indexes of LV mass and wall thickness, diastolic dysfunction, LV-GLS, and LGE presence. These findings support multimodality cardiovascular imaging, including CMR, in FD disease patients to predict long-term prognosis and call for longitudinal multicentre studies to develop multi-modality-imaging derived risk-score algorithms.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in lower-risk patients: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Background Long-term clinical outcomes after transcatheter [TAVI] and surgical [SAVR] aortic valve replacement are of utmost importance in lower-risk patients. Event rates are diminished in lower-risk patients, therefore individual trials may be separately underpowered to assess low-frequency outcomes. New randomised data has emerged, including 4, 5 and 10-year follow-up from the Evolut Low Risk, PARTNER-3 and NOTION trials, respectively. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials studying long-term outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low-surgical risk undergoing TAVI versus SAVR. Methods Trials randomising patients at lower surgical risk in trials comparing TAVI with SAVR were systematically identified. The prespecified primary endpoint was all-cause death. Key secondary endpoints included stroke, death or disabling stroke, cardiac death, new permanent pacemaker, aortic valve reintervention, and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Reconstructed individual patient data [IPD] was obtained via digitisation of Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Using these data, Cox proportional hazards regression was performed using frailty models on the primary outcome of all-cause death. To assess total lifetime lost, the restricted mean survival time [RMST] was calculated. Conventional pairwise random effects meta-analyses were also performed. This analysis was prospectively registered [CRD42023484976]. Results 4 eligible trials contributed data from 3557 patients with a weighted mean follow-up duration of approximately 4 years (47.6 months). In the reconstructed IPD pooled analyses, there was no significant difference in the hazard of death [hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.41, p=0.20] or RMST [Δ-0.8 months, p=0.09] (Figure 1). In pairwise meta-analyses, there was no difference between TAVI and SAVR in all-cause death [relative risk (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 1.13, p=0.51] (Figure 2). There was also no significant difference for stroke [RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.50, p=0.80], or a composite of death or disabling stroke [RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.22, p=0.57]. There was an increase in new pacemaker implantation with TAVI [RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.07, p<0.001], and a reduction in new AF with TAVI [RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.70, p<0.001]; there was no significant difference in any other endpoint (Figure 2). Conclusions The present analysis demonstrates no difference in major clinical outcomes with TAVI or SAVR in lower-risk patients at 4-years follow-up. These results were consistent when analysed using pooled reconstructed IPD or conventional meta-analyses and there were no differences in RMST. These data are informative for lower-risk patients and clinicians, but longer-term follow-up is required to confirm whether equivalence is maintained.Kaplan-Meier plot comparing TAVI vs SAVRForest plot for key clinical endpoints

Nivolumab plus anlotinib hydrochloride in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the phase II OASIS trial

Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), possess immunomodulatory properties and have shown promising outcomes when combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies. The OASIS phase II trial (NCT04503967) is designed to determine the clinical activity and safety of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and anlotinib hydrochloride (a multi-targets TKI) as second-line or above therapy in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). From December 2020 to September 2022, 45 patients with GAC and 3 with ESCC were enrolled in this study. The pre-specified endpoints were reached, with the primary endpoint of overall response rate achieving 29.2%. For secondary objectives, disease control rate was 64.6%; median progression-free survival was 4.0 months; and median overall survival was 11.1 months with a manageable toxicity profile. The exploratory analyses unveiled that the balance of gut bacteria and the presence of a pre-existing immune signature characterized by a high percentage of CD68+PD-L1+ PD-1+ macrophages and low pretreatment variant allele frequencies (VAF), as well as low expression of certain cytokines were significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with GAC.

Circulating Tumor Cell Count and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), new first-line combination therapies have enhanced overall survival (OS), but clinical outcomes for individual patients vary greatly and are difficult to predict. Peripheral blood circulating tumor cell (CTC) count is the most extensively validated prognostic liquid biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and recent studies have suggested that it may also be informative in mHSPC. To examine the prognostic value of CTC count in men with mHSPC. In this prognostic study, peripheral blood was drawn at registration (baseline) and at progression to mCRPC in the S1216 study (March 1, 2013, to July 15, 2017), a phase 3, prospective, randomized clinical trial in men with mHSPC. The CTCs were enumerated using a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared isolation platform. Counts were categorized as 0, 1 to 4, or 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL based on the prognostic value of these cut points in prior studies. The data analysis was performed between October 28, 2022, and June 15, 2023. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Circulating tumor cell count was evaluated for an association with 3 prespecified trial end points: OS, progression-free survival, and 7-month prostate-specific antigen, after adjusting for other baseline covariates using proportional hazards and logistic regression models. Of 1313 S1216 participants (median [IQR] age, 68 [44-92] years), evaluable samples from 503 (median [IQR] age, 69 [46-90] years) with newly diagnosed mHSPC were collected at baseline, and 93 samples were collected at progression. Baseline counts were 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL in 60 samples (11.9%), 1 to 4 CTCs per 7.5 mL in 107 samples (21.3%), and 0 CTCs per 7.5 mL in 336 samples (66.8%). Median OS for men with 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL was 27.9 months (95% CI, 24.1-31.2 months) compared with 56.2 months (95% CI, 45.7-69.8 months) for men with 1 to 4 CTCs per 7.5 mL and not reached at 78.0 months follow-up for men with 0 CTCs per 7.5 mL. After adjusting for baseline clinical covariates, men with 5 or more CTCs per 7.5 mL at baseline had a significantly higher hazard of death (hazard ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 2.22-4.68) and disease progression (hazard ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.76-3.43) and a lower likelihood of prostate-specific antigen complete response (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12-0.54) compared with men with 0 CTCs per 7.5 mL at baseline. Adding baseline CTC count to other known prognostic factors (covariates only: area under the curve, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79) resulted in an increased prognostic value for 3-year survival (area under the curve, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84). In this prognostic study, the findings validate CTC count as a prognostic biomarker that improved upon existing prognostic factors and estimated vastly divergent survival outcomes regardless of subsequent lines of therapy. As such, baseline CTC count in mHSPC may serve as a valuable noninvasive biomarker to identify men likely to have poor survival who may benefit from clinical trials of intensified or novel regimens.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in NRG Oncology RTOG 0436: a phase III trial evaluating the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and radiation for esophageal cancer treated without surgery.

NRG/RTOG 0436 evaluated cetuximab added to chemoradiation (CRT) for non-operative esophageal cancer management. PRO objectives assessed improvement in the FACT-Esophageal cancer subscale (ECS), version 4, with cetuximab, and if improved ECS correlated with clinical complete response (cCR). Patients were randomized to cisplatin/paclitaxel/radiation ± cetuximab. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with a 420 patient target, which also provided 82% power to detect ≥ 15 increase in the proportion of cetuximab patients with ECS improvement from baseline to 6-8weeks post-CRT; α = 0.05, using a χ2 test. Improvement in ECS and its Swallowing and Eating Indices (SI, EI) was defined as 5, 4 and 2 point increases, respectively, from baseline to 6-8weeks post-CRT. Univariate logistic regression assessed if cCR was associated with improved ECS. This study was stopped early for not meeting a pre-specified OS endpoint and did not show survival benefit. Of 420 planned patients, 344 enrolled and 281 consented to PROs. ECS was completed by 261 (93%) at baseline, 173 (66%) 6-8weeks post-CRT, and 117 (64%) at 1year. At 6-8weeks, patients receiving CRT + Cetuximab didn't have improved ECS; they experienced a lower proportion of improvement compared to standard CRT (37% vs. 53%; P = 0.04). The proportion of CRT patients with improvement in SI was 9% higher than with cetuximab, but not statistically significant (39% vs. 30%, P = 0.22). There was no association between treatment and EI. When examining ECS scores at 1year by cCR vs. residual disease, a higher proportion of cCR patients improved, but not statistically significant (48% vs. 45%, P = 0.74). The addition of cetuximab to CRT for the nonoperative management of esophageal cancer did not improve PROs.

Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio for onsite assessment of coronary lesions.

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (CT-μFR) is a novel non-invasive method for fast computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from CCTA images, yet its diagnostic performance remains to be prospectively validated. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of onsite CT-μFR in patients with coronary artery disease. This prospective, single-centre trial enrolled patients with ≥1 lesion with 30-90% diameter stenosis on CCTA and planned invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 30 days. CT-μFR, ICA-derived μFR and FFR were evaluated separately in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracy of CT-μFR in identifying patients with haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis defined by the invasive standard: FFR ≤0.80, or μFR ≤0.80 when FFR was not available. Between December 2020 and August 2023, 260 patients were consecutively enrolled. Paired comparison between CT-μFR and the invasive standard was obtained in 706 vessels from 260 patients. The patient-level accuracy of CT-μFR was 89.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.9-93.4%), which was significantly higher than the prespecified target of 72.0% (p<0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for CT-μFR were 93.1%, 86.1%, 87.1%, 92.5%, 6.7, and 0.1, respectively. Out of the 231 vessels investigated by FFR, the accuracy of CT-μFR in vessels without extensive calcification was non-inferior to that of μFR (90.6% vs 88.9%; difference=1.8% [95% CI: -2.8 to 5.5%]; p for non-inferiority<0.001). The study met its prespecified primary endpoint of the diagnostic accuracy of CT-μFR in identifying patients with haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. CT-μFR was non-inferior to ICA-derived μFR in vessels without extensive calcification. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04665817).

Sacubitril/Valsartan in Pediatric Heart Failure (PANORAMA-HF): A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Trial.

Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), is an established treatment for heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. It has not been rigorously compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in children. PANORAMA-HF (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF) is a randomized, double-blind trial that evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), safety, and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in children 1 month to <18 years of age with HF attributable to systemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Children with HF attributable to LVSD were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan at 52 weeks of follow-up. The primary end point of the study was to determine whether sacubitril/valsartan was superior to enalapril for the treatment of pediatric patients with HF attributable to systemic LVSD, assessed using a primary global rank end point consisting of ranking patients from worst to best on the basis of clinical events such as death, listing for urgent heart transplant, mechanical life support requirement, worsening HF, New York Heart Association (NYHA)/Ross class, Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory physical functioning domain. The change from baseline to 52 weeks in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) was an exploratory end point. A total of 375 children (mean age, 8.1±5.6 years; 52% female) were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (n=187) or enalapril (n=188). At week 52, no significant difference was observed between the 2 treatment arms in the global rank end point (Mann-Whitney probability, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.47-0.58]; Mann-Whitney odds, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.72-1.14]; P=0.42). At week 52, clinically meaningful reductions were observed in both treatment arms in NYHA/Ross, PGIS, Patient Global Impression of Change, and NT-proBNP, without significant differences between groups. Adverse events were similar between treatment arms (incidence: sacubitril/valsartan, 88.8%; enalapril, 87.8%), and the safety profile of sacubitril/valsartan was acceptable in children. In this study, sacubitril/valsartan did not show superiority over enalapril in the treatment of children with HF attributable to systemic LVSD using the prespecified global rank end point. However, both treatment arms showed clinically meaningful improvements over 52 weeks. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02678312.

Sex and outcomes after stenting and endarterectomy in asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis patients

ObjectivesTo determine if sex was an effect modifier in a pooled analysis of asymptomatic patients from CREST and ACT I. Materials and MethodsWe analyzed data from 2544 patients aged <80 with ≥70 % asymptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to CAS or CEA (nCREST = 1091; nACT-1 = 1453). The pre-specified primary endpoint in both trials was any stroke, myocardial infarction or death during the peri-procedural period, or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years of randomization. The secondary endpoint was any stroke or death during the peri-procedural period, or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years of randomization. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the frequency of events for men or women between CAS and CEA for the primary or secondary endpoints. When assessing for an interaction of sex and risks between procedures, the treatment-by-sex interaction was not significant for either primary or secondary endpoints in the four-year period or the peri-procedural period. However, women had significantly fewer post-procedural events (ipsilateral stroke) with CAS than CEA (HR = 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.09–1.18) compared to men (HR = 2.09, 95 % CI: 0.78–5.61), p = 0.02 for interaction. ConclusionsIn this large, pooled analysis of asymptomatic patients comparing CAS to CEA, sex did not act as an effect modifier of treatment differences in the four-year primary stroke-MI-or-death endpoint or the secondary stroke-or-death endpoint. However, during the post-procedural period men treated with CAS were at higher risk than their female counterparts.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in women with mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer: a phase I study

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown unprecedented activity in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancers, but its effectiveness in MMRd endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. In this investigator-driven, phase I, feasibility study (NCT04262089), 10 women with MMRd EC of any grade, planned for primary surgery, received two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) every three weeks. A pathologic response (primary objective) was observed in 5/10 patients, with 2 patients showing a major pathologic response. No patient achieved a complete pathologic response. A partial radiologic response (secondary objective) was observed in 3/10 patients, 5/10 patients had stable disease and 2/10 patients were non-evaluable on magnetic resonance imaging. All patients completed treatment without severe toxicity (exploratory objective). At median duration of follow-up of 22.5 months, two non-responders experienced disease recurrence. In-depth analysis of the loco-regional and systemic immune response (predefined exploratory objective) showed that monoclonal T cell expansion significantly correlated with treatment response. Tumour-draining lymph nodes displayed clonal overlap with intra-tumoural T cell expansion. All pre-specified endpoints, efficacy in terms of pathologic response as primary endpoint, radiologic response as secondary outcome and safety and tolerability as exploratory endpoint, were reached. Neoadjuvant ICB with pembrolizumab proved safe and induced pathologic, radiologic, and immunologic responses in MMRd EC, warranting further exploration of extended neoadjuvant treatment.

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Leronlimab in Mild-To-Moderate COVID-19

PurposeEarly in the course of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic it was hypothesised that host genetics played a role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 including a suggestion that the CCR5-Δ32 mutation may be protective in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Leronlimab is an investigational CCR5-specific humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody currently in development for HIV-1 infection. We aimed to explore the impact of leronlimab on the severity of disease symptoms among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. MethodsThe TEMPEST trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous leronlimab (700 mg) or placebo on days 0 and 7. The primary efficacy endpoint was assessed by change in total symptom score based on fever, myalgia, dyspnea, and cough, at end of treatment (day 14). FindingsOverall, 84 participants were randomized and treated with leronlimab (n = 56) or placebo (n = 28). No difference was observed in change in total symptom score (P = 0.8184) or other pre-specified secondary endpoints between treatments. However, in a post hoc analysis, 50.0% of participants treated with leronlimab demonstrated improvements from baseline in National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) at day 14, compared with 20·8% of participants in the placebo group (post hoc; p = 0.0223). Among participants in this trial with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 adverse events rates were numerically but not statistically significantly lower in leronlimab participants (33.9%) compared with placebo participants (50.0%). ImplicationsAt the time the TEMPEST trial was designed although CCR5 was known to be implicated in COVID-19 disease severity the exact pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection was poorly understood. Today it is well accepted that SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic-to-mild cases is primarily characterized by viral replication, with a heightened immune response, accompanied by diminished viral replication in moderate-to-severe disease and a peak in inflammatory responses with excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in critical disease. It is therefore perhaps not surprising that no differences between treatments were observed in the primary endpoint or in pre-specified secondary endpoints among participants with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, the results of the exploratory post hoc analysis showing that participants in the leronlimab group had greater improvement in NEWS2 assessment compared to placebo provided a suggestion that leronlimab may be associated with a lower likelihood of people with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 progressing to more severe disease and needs to be confirmed in other appropriately designed clinical trials.ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04343651 https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343651

Long-term risk of right coronary artery injury after catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus–dependent flutter

BackgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)–dependent atrial flutter requires ablation of the tricuspid annulus overlying the right coronary artery (RCA). Although it is considered safe, reports of acute and subacute RCA injury in human and animal studies raise the possibility of late RCA stenosis. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the incidence and severity of angiographic RCA stenoses in patients who have undergone CTI RFA with a control group to assess the long-term risk of RCA damage. MethodsA 2-center retrospective case-cohort study was performed including all patients from 2002 to 2018 undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) with CTI ablation (CTI + AF) or AF ablation alone with subsequent coronary angiography (CAG). The AF alone group served as controls because of anticipated similarity of baseline characteristics. Coronary arteries that are anatomically remote to the CTI were examined as prespecified falsification end points. CAG was scored by a blinded observer. ResultsThere were 156 patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation with subsequent CAG (CTI + AF, n = 81; AF alone, n = 75) with no difference in baseline characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. Mean time from ablation to CAG was similar (CTI + AF, 5.0 ± 3.7 years; AF alone, 5.4 ± 3.9 years; P = .5). The mid and distal RCA showed no difference in the average number of angiographic stenoses or lesion severity. In regression analysis, CTI ablation was not a predictor of RCA stenosis severity (P = .6). There was no difference in coronary disease at sites remote to the CTI ablation (P = NS for all). ConclusionThere was no observed relationship between CTI RFA and the number or severity of angiographically apparent RCA stenoses in long-term follow-up.

Abstract P344: APOe Genotype Modifies the Association Between Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Cognitive Decline/Dementia in Older Adults

We previously reported an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia with high visit-to-visit long-term blood pressure variability (BPV) in the ASPREE randomized trial of low-dose aspirin, conducted in 19,114 community-dwelling older adults in Australia and the USA who were initially free of significant cognitive impairment and diagnosed dementia at enrollment. Upon completion of the randomized trial phase, ASPREE participants were invited into the ASPREE-eXTension (ASPREE-XT) observational study. In this analysis, we re-examined the risks of cognitive decline and dementia using extended follow-up from ASPREE-XT, and including recently available APOe genotype as an additional covariate. Long-term BPV was estimated in each participant using standard deviation (SD) of the means of three within-visit systolic BPs obtained with a validated automated oscillometric BP monitor from the baseline and first two annual ASPREE visits. During ASPREE and continued into ASPREE-XT, participants underwent annual/biennial standardized cognitive testing (4-test battery). Incident cognitive decline was defined as &gt;1.5 SD decline from baseline score on any cognitive test; incident dementia was a pre-specified secondary endpoint of ASPREE/ASPREE-XT and adjudicated by expert panel using DSM-IV criteria and clinical records. Participants reaching cognitive decline or dementia endpoints during the BPV estimation period were excluded from the analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression showed the highest SD tertile of BPV, compared to the lowest SD tertile, remained associated with highest risk of cognitive decline (HR=1.16, 95% CI=1.04-1.30) and dementia (HR=1.27 (95% CI=1.02-1.59) in men, and cognitive decline (HR=1.12, 95% CI=1.01-1.24) in women (see accompanying Table), over a median follow-up of 5.8 years (for cognitive decline) and 6.5 years (for dementia). When APOe genotype was included as an additional covariate in an available subset of the cohort (81%), the presence of APOe4 allele partially attenuated the associations in both sexes, although cognitive decline remained significant in men. Our findings suggest the relationship between high long-term BPV and cognitive decline and dementia is stronger in men than women, but also modified by underlying APOe genotype.

A 7-Gene Biosignature for Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast Identifies Subpopulations of HER2-positive Patients With Distinct Recurrence Rates After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy

PurposeA subpopulation of women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains at risk for in-breast recurrence (IBR) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation therapy (RT). The NSABP B-43 trial evaluated the role of concurrent RT and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive DCIS but did not reach the prespecified endpoint. We hypothesized that a 7-gene biosignature (DCISionRT) with its Residual Risk subtype (RRt) could identify 2 groups of HER2(3+) patients with significantly different IBR risks after BCS plus RT. Patients and MethodsAll patients with HER2(3+) DCIS (n = 178) treated with BCS plus RT were selected from a combined multinational patient cohort. Treatment decisions were neither randomized nor strictly rules-based. Biosignature testing was performed on all patients and stratified with previously defined groups: (1) Combined Low Risk group (DS ≤ 2.8) and Elevated Risk group (DS > 2.8) without RRt or (2) Residual Risk subtype. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compute IBR curves. ResultsSixty-three percent of HER2(3+) patients (113/178) were classified into the Residual Risk subtype. These patients had significantly higher 10-year rates of IBR compared to the nonresidual risk group (16.2% vs. 1.6%, P = .01). The Residual Risk subtype had more nuclear grade 3 disease (87% vs. 63%, P < .001), but age, size, and grade were not associated with IBR rate (P = NS) on univariate and multivariable analysis. Only the Residual Risk group was associated with IBR (P = .05) in multivariate analysis. ConclusionThe 7-gene biosignature with RRt identified a subset of HER2(3+) patients with greater IBR rates following BCS and RT beyond traditional clinical and pathologic features. Consideration of therapies to reduce these elevated IBR rates should be evaluated, including the incorporation of HER2-targeted therapy.

Potassium Supplementation and Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery

Supplementing potassium in an effort to maintain high-normal serum concentrations is a widespread strategy used to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (AFACS), but is not evidence-based, carries risks, and is costly. To determine whether a lower serum potassium concentration trigger for supplementation is noninferior to a high-normal trigger. This open-label, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 23 cardiac surgical centers in the United Kingdom and Germany. Between October 20, 2020, and November 16, 2023, patients with no history of atrial dysrhythmias scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery were enrolled. The last study patient was discharged from the hospital on December 11, 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to a strategy of tight or relaxed potassium control (only supplementing if serum potassium concentration fell below 4.5 mEq/L or 3.6 mEq/L, respectively). Patients wore an ambulatory heart rhythm monitor, which was analyzed by a core laboratory masked to treatment assignment. The prespecified primary end point was clinically detected and electrocardiographically confirmed new-onset AFACS in the first 120 hours after CABG surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. All primary outcome events were validated by an event validation committee, which was masked to treatment assignment. Noninferiority of relaxed potassium control was defined as a risk difference for new-onset AFACS with associated upper bound of a 1-sided 97.5% CI of less than 10%. Secondary outcomes included other heart rhythm-related events, clinical outcomes, and cost related to the intervention. A total of 1690 patients (mean age, 65 years; 256 [15%] females) were randomized. The primary end point occurred in 26.2% of patients (n = 219) in the tight group and 27.8% of patients (n = 231) in the relaxed group, which is a risk difference of 1.7% (95% CI, -2.6% to 5.9%). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of at least 1 AFACS episode detected by any means or by ambulatory heart rhythm monitor alone, non-AFACS dysrhythmias, in-patient mortality, or length of stay. Per-patient cost for purchasing and administering potassium was significantly lower in the relaxed group (mean difference, $111.89 [95% CI, $103.60-$120.19]; P <.001). For AFACS prophylaxis, supplementation only when serum potassium concentration fell below 3.6 mEq/L was noninferior to the current widespread practice of supplementing potassium to maintain a serum potassium concentration greater than or equal to 4.5 mEq/L. The lower threshold of supplementation was not associated with any increase in dysrhythmias or adverse clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04053816.

Effect of Triple Therapy on Cardiovascular and Severe Cardiopulmonary Events in COPD: A Post-hoc Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Clinical Trial (ETHOS).

Rationale: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary events. In the Phase III, 52-week ETHOS trial (NCT02465567), triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF) reduced rates of moderate/severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality versus dual therapy with glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (GFF) or budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BFF). However, the effect of BGF on cardiovascular events versus GFF remains unevaluated. Further, the effect of BGF on time to first severe exacerbation has not been reported. Objective: Assess the effects of BGF 320/18/9.6 μg (BGF 320) and other ICS-containing arms on cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary endpoints versus GFF in patients with COPD from ETHOS. Methods: Patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD and a history of exacerbations were randomized to twice-daily BGF 320, BGF 160/18/9.6 μg, BFF 320/9.6 μg, or GFF 18/9.6 µg (GFF). Time to first severe COPD exacerbation was a pre-specified endpoint; post-hoc cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary endpoints included time to first major adverse cardiac event (MACE), time to first cardiovascular adverse event (AE) of special interest (CVAESI), time to first cardiac AE, and time to the composite endpoint of first severe cardiopulmonary event. Measurements and Main Results: BGF 320 reduced the rate of first occurrence (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) of cardiovascular and severe cardiopulmonary events versus GFF, including for CVAESI (0.63 [0.48, 0.82]), cardiac AE (0.60 [0.48, 0.76]), and severe cardiopulmonary event (0.80 [0.67, 0.95]). Conclusions: BGF had a benefit on cardiovascular endpoints and severe cardiopulmonary events versus GFF in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy for treatment-naive advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial

This single-arm phase 2 trial (ChiCTR2100046715) examined previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received four cycles of paclitaxel with carboplatin every 3 weeks. Toripalimab was infused intravenously every 3 weeks for 12 months, or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Radiotherapy that encompassed the primary lesions and metastases commenced in the third cycle. The median progression-free survival time was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8–not estimable) in the intent-to-treat population, failing to meet the pre-specified primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included an objective response rate of 45.5%, a disease control rate of 57.6%, and a median duration of response of 11.5 months (interquartile range, 6.4–15.0). The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 41.9% (95% CI: 27.7–63.5) and 69.7% (95% CI: 55.7–87.3), respectively. Lymphopenia was the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse event (82%), and an esophageal fistula developed in three patients (9.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. In prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis, higher densities of CD8 + T cells, CD11c+ dendritic cells, and CD68+ macrophages correlated with improved tumor response and prognosis. Radiotherapy supplementation to first-line chemo-immunotherapy for treatment-naive advanced ESCC demonstrated some antitumor activity and manageable safety profiles, warranting further randomized controlled trials.

Safety and activity of lenalidomide in combination with obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single group, open-label, phase 1/2 trial

Rituximab and lenalidomide is a preferred option for relapsed indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Obinutuzumab may be a superior combination partner with lenalidomide given enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis compared to rituximab. Our aim was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and activity of lenalidomide in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory WHO Grade 1-3A follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma and adequate performance status (ECOG 0-2) at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. We excluded patients with evidence of ongoing transformation to aggressive lymphoma. During phase 1, 1000mg intravenous obinutuzumab was administered with three predefined levels of oral lenalidomide in a 3+3 dose escalation design to establish lenalidomide 20mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. During phase 2, patients received induction therapy with six 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 20mg with intravenous obinutuzumab 1000mg. In accordance with our prior experience with lenalidomide plus rituximab, patients who were responding to the combination could receive up to 6 additional cycles (up to 12 cycles in total) of combination therapy. Dosing of obinutuzumab was continued in all responding patients after cycle 6 every 2 months for a total of 30 months from the start of therapy. The decision of number of cycles of combination therapy beyond 6 was at discretion of the investigator and was included to allow individualisation of therapy to maximise response while minimising exposure. The co-primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and overall response, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete or partial response in relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the end of induction therapy, according to Cheson and colleagues (2007 criteria). The secondary endpoints were complete response after induction therapy and time to event endpoints including time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Analyses were intent to treat in the efficacy cohort and per-treated in the safety population in all patients who received at least one dose of either investigational agent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01995669. Between June 03, 2014, and 07 March 2019, we completed planned enrolment, and 66 patients started therapy including 9 patients in phase 1 and 57 patients in phase 2. All patients were evaluated for safety and the 60 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide 20mg were evaluable for activity. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicities included neutropenia 21% (14/66) and thrombocytopenia 11% (7/66) with no cases of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities included lung infection 8% (5/66), fatigue 8% (5/66) and rash 6% (4/66). By Cheson 2007 criteria, 90% (54/60, 95% CI: 79-96) achieved an overall response at the end of induction meeting the prespecified activity endpoint. Complete responses were seen in 33% (20/60, 95% CI: 22-47) at the end of induction. Median progression free survival, time to progression and overall survival have not been reached after median follow-up of 41.7 months. Estimated 4-year progression free survival rates were 55% (95% CI: 42-73), time to progression of 56% (95% CI: 43-74) and overall survival of 84% (95% CI: 74-95). Our findings suggest that oral lenalidomide with obinutuzumab is safe and highly active in patients with relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is associated with prolonged remission duration. The study is limited by the lack of a control arm leading to cross-trial comparisons to evaluate activity. Future randomised trials comparing this regime to rituximab and lenalidomide are warranted. Genentech and an MD Anderson Core grant.

Management of Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: The PERSEO Registry.

In patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent, international guidelines endorse the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) rather than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) rather than triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). The aim of this study was to evaluate contemporary real-world data on antithrombotic regimens and outcome in patients on OAC undergoing PCI with stent. Consecutive patients on OAC undergoing PCI were enrolled in the multicenter, prospective, observational PERSEO registry (NCT03392948). Primary end point was net adverse clinical events (NACE) with VKA versus DOAC, whereas a secondary prespecified end point was NACE with DAT versus TAT both at 1-year follow-up. From February 2018 to February 2022; in total, 1234 consecutive patients were included. The main indication for OAC was atrial fibrillation (86%), and the mean CHA 2 DS 2 VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4 ± 2 and 3.6 ± 1, respectively. Of the 1228 patients discharged alive, 222 (18%) were on VKA and 1006 (82%) on DOAC ( P < 0.01). DAT was employed in 197 patients whereas TAT in 1028. At follow-up, NACE rate was significantly higher than VKA compared with DOAC (23% vs. 16%, P = 0.013) and confirmed after propensity score adjustment. TAT and DAT did not differ as regards NACE rate (17% vs. 19%, P = 0.864) although, compared with TAT, DAT was associated with less major bleedings (2% vs. 5%, P = 0.014), confirmed after propensity score adjustment. In conclusion, in patients on OAC undergoing PCI, DOAC, compared with VKA, was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of NACE and DAT reduced bleedings compared with TAT.

Outpatient treatment of decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and study level meta-analysis.

Patients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) are usually admitted to hospital for management. There is growing interest in delivering intravenous (IV) diuretic therapy at home, in the community or at hospital day-care units; the safety and effectiveness of outpatient-based management (OPM) for ADHF has not been established. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the short-term safety and effectiveness of OPM compared with inpatient management (IPM) of ADHF. Pre-specified endpoints were 30day mortality and 30day hospitalization. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Twenty-nine studies of OPM were identified, including 7683 patients. Only five studies directly compared OPM (n=1303) with IPM (n=2047), including three observational studies, and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The other 24 studies only stated OPM outcomes. For the five studies comparing IPM versus OPM, patients were generally aged >75years and of similar age for each strategy, with a similar proportion of men (56%). In a study-level, aggregate analysis, 30day all-cause mortality was 9.3% (121/1303) for OPM, compared with 15.6% (320/2047) for IPM [OR 0.29 (95% CI 0.09, 0.93) P=0.04]. Four studies reported 30day all-cause hospitalization; 22.0% for IPM versus 16.8% for OPM [OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.61, 0.89), P=0.001]. In the two RCTs, we found no difference in 30day mortality or hospitalization. In observational studies, OPM of ADHF is associated with lower 30day hospitalization and lower 30day mortality; such differences were not observed in two small, single-centre RCTs. A substantial, multicentre RCT is required to confirm the safety and effectiveness of OPM for ADHF.

The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST): Clinically meaningful response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder receiving antidepressant treatment

BackgroundFunctional impairment is common in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) provides a detailed clinician-rated assessment of functioning across multiple aspects of daily life. This study aimed to establish clinically relevant response thresholds for the FAST in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant treatment. MethodsData were derived from three 8-week clinical trials of antidepressant therapy in patients with MDD that included assessment of functioning using the FAST as a pre-specified endpoint. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and threshold for response in terms of change in FAST total score were determined using anchor-based methods. ResultsAfter 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment, the mean reduction in FAST total score in patients considered clinically minimally improved (Clinical Global Impression–Improvement [CGI-I] score of 3) was 7–9 points (~20 % reduction). The threshold for functional response (reduction in FAST total score from baseline in patients with a CGI-I score of ≤2 at week 8) was 16–19 points (~50 % reduction). The threshold for functional response was higher in patients with MDD and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder than in those with MDD alone (mean reduction in FAST total score at 8 weeks: 26 points [63 %]). LimitationsShort-term studies. ConclusionsThese results provide further validation of the FAST for assessing functioning in patients with MDD. In patients with MDD, the suggested MCID for FAST total score is 7–9 points and the proposed threshold for response is a reduction from baseline of approximately 50 %.