Presence Of White-coat Hypertension Research Articles

Hypertension in kidney transplantation: a consensus statement of the 'hypertension and the kidney' working group of the European Society of Hypertension.

Hypertension is common in kidney transplantation recipients and may be difficult to treat. Factors present before kidney transplantation, related to the transplantation procedure itself and factors developing after transplantation may contribute to blood pressure (BP) elevation in kidney transplant recipients. The present consensus is based on the results of three recent systematic reviews, the latest guidelines and the current literature. The current transplant guidelines, which recommend only office BP assessments for risk stratification in kidney transplant patients should be reconsidered, given the presence of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension in this population and the better prediction of adverse outcomes by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring as indicated in recent systematic reviews. Hypertension is associated with adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and decreased survival in kidney transplant recipients. Current evidence suggests calcium channel blockers could be the preferred first-step antihypertensive agents in kidney transplant patients, as they improve graft function and reduce graft loss, whereas no clear benefit is documented for renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use over conventional treatment in the current literature. Randomized control trials demonstrating the clinical benefits of BP lowering on kidney and major cardiovascular events and recording patient-related outcomes are still needed. These trials should define optimal BP targets for kidney transplant recipients. In the absence of kidney transplant-specific evidence, BP targets in kidney transplant recipients should be similar to those in the wider chronic kidney disease population.

Isolated systolic hypertension in the young

: Whether isolated systolic hypertension in the young (ISHY) implies a worse outcome and needs antihypertensive treatment is still a matter for dispute. ISHY is thought to have different mechanisms than systolic hypertension in the elderly. However, findings from previous studies have provided inconsistent results. From the analysis of the literature, two main lines of research and conceptualization have emerged. Simultaneous assessment of peripheral and central blood pressure led to the identification of a condition called pseudo or spurious hypertension, which was considered an innocent condition. However, an increase in pulse wave velocity has been found by some authors in about 20% of the individuals with ISHY. In addition, obesity and metabolic disturbances have often been documented to be associated with ISHY both in children and young adults. The first aspect to consider whenever evaluating a person with ISHY is the possible presence of white-coat hypertension, which has been frequently found in this condition. In addition, assessment of central blood pressure is useful for identifying ISHY patients whose central blood pressure is normal. ISHY is infrequently mentioned in the guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. According to the 2013 European Guidelines on the management of hypertension, people with ISHY should be followed carefully, modifying risk factors by lifestyle changes and avoiding antihypertensive drugs. Only future clinical trials will elucidate if a benefit can be achieved with pharmacological treatment in some subgroups of ISHY patients with associated risk factors and/or high central blood pressure.

Subclinical Organ Damage in White-Coat Hypertension: The Possible Role of Cystatin C.

The authors investigated the relationship of white-coat hypertension (WCH) with subclinical organ damage and potential relevant mechanisms. A total of 386 untreated patients were enrolled and divided into 204 patients with WCH and 183 with normotension. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), pulse wave velocity (PWV), intima-media thickness, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and cystatin C levels were measured. All tests were two-sided, and a P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. The WCH group exhibited higher LVMI and PWV values, decreased E/A ratio and FMD values, and increased prevalence for left ventricular hypertrophy compared with controls (P<.001 for all). Cystatin C was significantly higher in the WCH group compared with controls (P=.035) and was positively associated with LVMI (P<.05 for both). The presence of WCH is associated with more pronounced subclinical organ damage compared with normotension. Cystatin C may play a significant role and therefore warrants further investigation.

Cardiovascular and renal events in uncomplicated mild hypertensive patients with sustained and white coat hypertension

The prognostic value of white coat hypertension (WCH) in uncomplicated patients with mild hypertension is not yet completely clear. We investigated cardiovascular outcomes in patients with mild hypertension and without left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, and associated cardiovascular and renal disease, with sustained hypertension (SH) and WCH. The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 1038 patients with mild hypertension and 241 normotensive subjects. The presence of WCH was defined as clinic hypertension and daytime blood pressure <135/85 mm Hg. During follow-up (4.5 +/- 2.3 years, range 0.5 to 9.2 years) the event rates per 100 patient-years in subjects with normotension, WCH, and SH were 0.27, 0.38, and 1.39, respectively. After adjustment for other covariates, Cox regression analysis showed that SH was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events (SH versus WCH, RR 5.17, 95% CI 2.04 to 13.1, P = 0 .001), whereas there was no significant difference between normotension and WCH (normotension versus WCH, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.98, P = .92). At the end of follow-up, drug therapy was less frequent and intensive in WCH than in SH. In this study of individuals with mild hypertension and without left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, and associated cardiovascular and renal disease, subjects with WCH, despite less frequent and intensive drug therapy, had a significantly better prognosis than those with sustained hypertension.