Presence Of Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve Research Articles

Does presence of left ventricular contractile reserve improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy? An updated meta-analysis.

Up to a third of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not have a clinical or echocardiographic response. It is also unclear, whether contractile reserve (CR) could predict CRT response. This meta-analysis examines whether the presence of CR improves response to CRT and whether this is modulated by other clinical factors. Search of PubMed/EMBASE/Cochrane databases for articles examining response to CRT stratified by the presence or not of CR. End-point classified as clinical or echocardiographic response. The analysis compared response to CRT (echocardiographic or clinical) between patients with or without CR. 824 patients in 12 studies were included. The presence of left ventricular CR was associated with a significant reduction in echocardiographic non-responders to CRT compared to patients without CR (OR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33, p<0.00001). The presence of left ventricular CR was associated with a significant reduction in clinical non-responders to CRT compared to patients without CR (OR: 0.23, 95% CI 0.14-0.37, p<0.00001). Sensitivity analysis showed no difference in response when pooling studies using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or non-LVEF markers of CR. Meta-regression showed that CR was associated with lower rates of non-responders and this was more pronounced in patients with a narrower mean QRS complex. Identification of CR is associated with improved response to CRT. Importantly, QRS width is a potential moderator variable which can explain part of the heterogeneity in echo response. The combination of CR and QRS width may modulate the response to CRT.

Left ventricular contractile reserve by stress echocardiography as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe presence of left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) during stress echo (SE) may provide favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients. The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis of available SE data in this set of patients.MethodsFrom a Pubmed and Advance Google Scholar database web based search scan up to December 2016, we initially identified 5906 records. From this initial set, we removed that did not include SE and duplicate studies. We assessed for eligibility 71 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, and 60 of them did not meet the inclusion criteria as follow: 1) heart failure patients with NYHA class III and IV, depressed ejection fraction (EF <35%) and QRS duration ≥120 ms at study entry; 2) SE with assessment of LVCR; 3) Follow-up data. LVCR during SE was identified as reduction in wall motion score index and/or an increase in EF.ResultsEleven studies with 861 patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years, ejection fraction 25 ± 6%) were included in the meta-analysis. The type of stress was either exercise (n = 2) or dobutamine (n = 9), the latter with low-dose (10 mcg) in two, intermediate-dose (20 mcg) in five, and high-dose (40 mcg) protocol in two studies. LVCR was detected in 555 patients (63%) and CRT-response was present in 584 (66%). The overall odds ratio for LVCR to predict a favorable CRT response was 2.06 (95%, CI 1.70–2-43), Z score: 11.055, p < 0.001.ConclusionThe presence of LVCR during SE with either dobutamine or exercise is associated with a greater chance of response to CRT. This parameter is now ready to be tested in a prospective multicenter trial to select patients more likely to benefit from CRT.

Stress Echocardiography in Regurgitant Valve Disease

Because of its wide availability, low cost, versatility, and clinical use, stress echocardiography has become increasingly recognized as a valuable tool in the assessment of patients with regurgitant valvular heart disease. Exercise testing is favored compared with pharmacological stress testing for risk stratification in asymptomatic patients and can identify what might otherwise be considered as a moderate valve disease. It has been shown to provide insights into exertional symptoms disproportionate to resting hemodynamics in these patients and to facilitate individual risk stratification. Aggravation of valvular regurgitation severity, exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (PHT), impaired left ventricular (LV) contractile reserve, inducible ischemia, dynamic LV dyssynchrony, and altered exercise capacity, together with the development of symptoms during exercise echocardiography, provide the clinician with straightforward prognostic information, therefore enabling a more accurate definition of the optimal timing of intervention in patients with valvular regurgitation.1,2 In contrast, dobutamine stress echocardiography has little value in cases of valvular regurgitation. Dobutamine infusion is almost systematically associated with a decrease in the severity of regurgitation; however, it might be of interest in the detection of LV contractile reserve and inducible ischemia. The most common form of exercise used in conjunction with echocardiography is immediate postexercise imaging on a treadmill or upright bicycle ergometer. However, semisupine exercise testing on an appropriate tilted table allows continuous echocardiographic monitoring, which represents an advantageous tool for quantifying changes in valvular regurgitation severity, LV function, and pulmonary pressure (Table). This exercise stress echocardiography modality (ie, per-exercise echocardiography) is the most used in Europe, and we strongly suggest this approach in the setting of valvular heart disease to detect evanescent changes. A symptom-limited graded exercise test is recommended, and ≥80% of the age-predicted upper heart rate should be reached in the absence of symptoms. The test is adapted to the clinical conditions …

Low-dose dobutamine test associated with interventricular dyssynchrony: A useful tool to identify cardiac resynchronization therapy responders: Data from the LOw dose DObutamine stress-echo test in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (LODO-CRT) phase 2 study

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in patients with heart failure, but 30% to 50% of subjects are classified as nonresponders. Identifying responders remains a challenging task. The LODO-CRT trial investigated the association between left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR) and clinical and echocardiographic long-term CRT response. This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Left ventricular contractile reserve was detected using a dobutamine stress echocardiography test, defined as an ejection fraction increase of >5 points. Clinical CRT response was defined as the absence of major cardiovascular events (ie, cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization). Echocardiographic response was defined as a left ventricle end-systolic volume reduction of >10%. A total of 221 CRT-indicated patients were studied (80% presented LVCR). During a mean follow-up of 15 ± 5 months, 17 patients died and 16 were hospitalized due to heart failure. The proportion of clinical responders was 155 (88%) of 177 and 33 (75%) of 44 (P = .036) in the groups with and without LVCR, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in cardiac survival/hospitalization between patients with and without LVCR. The proportion of echocardiographic responders was 144 (87%) of 166 and 16 (42%) of 38 in the groups with and without LVCR (P < .001), respectively; LVCR showed 90% sensitivity and 87% positive predictive value to prefigure echocardiographic CRT responders. Multivariable analysis identified LVCR and interventricular dyssynchrony as independent predictors of CRT response. The concomitant presence of both factors showed 99% specificity and 83% sensitivity in detecting responders. The presence of LVCR helps in predicting a clinical and echocardiographic CRT response. Concomitant assessment of LVCR and interventricular dyssynchrony accurately stratifies responder and nonresponder patients.