e15034 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a potential noninvasive biomarker to assess tumor burden throughout cancer treatment and to aid in clinical decision-making. However, data on the use of ctDNA in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is currently lacking. In this study, we report our first experience with ctDNA in patients with cSCC. Methods: In this IRB-approved study at a tertiary care center, an initial cohort of patients with intermediate to high-risk cSCC had tissue and plasma sent for ctDNA analysis using Natera®’s proprietary bioinformatics pipeline. This cohort included 21 patients treated from 2023 to the present. Initial tissue samples were obtained through biopsy (i.e., excisional, punch, or shave), Mohs surgery, or surgical resection. Some patients had additional plasma sample(s) drawn later during or after the treatment course. Patients either received a “positive,” “positive below analytical range,” or “negative” result or had ‘insufficient sample’ to receive a result based on Natera®’s analysis. All patients were treated curatively with surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation as per the standard of care. The assessment of gross disease was determined based on whether the patient had disease present on imaging or physical exam at the time of the plasma draw. A comparison of ctDNA results and the presence of gross disease was done using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Of the samples submitted for Natera® ctDNA analysis, 18/21 had sufficient tissue for analysis of tumor DNA. All 3 tumors with insufficient tissue were from biopsies (6/9 sufficient), while 12/12 of those from Mohs or surgical resection had sufficient tissue. The average tumor volume in these patients with insufficient samples for tumor analysis was relatively low (0.35 cm3) compared to those that resulted (17-30 cm3). 7/9 (78%) patients with gross disease had a positive ctDNA result, which was significantly greater than those with no gross disease (1/9 patients, 11%) (p = 0.004). Three patients in our cohort with an initially positive ctDNA result had multiple plasma draws, with all having a later draw demonstrating a negative ctDNA result after having surgery and/or radiation. Conclusions: Circulating tumor DNA is a reliable marker for patients with cSCC with a high tumor burden and is feasible in those with adequate tissue. However, in patients where it is only possible to obtain a small volume of tumor tissue and/or low tumor burden, ctDNA may be a less reliable biomarker. [Table: see text]