You have accessJournal of UrologyPediatrics: Andrology-Cryptorchidism & Varicoceles1 Apr 2011330 PERCUTANEOUS VARICOCELE EMBOLIZATION IN CHILDREN: COMPARISON OF PRIMARY VS. SALVAGE THERAPY Sylvia Montag, Arvin George, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Zhamshid Okhunov, Ardeshir Rastinehad, David Siegel, and Lane S. Palmer Sylvia MontagSylvia Montag New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author , Arvin GeorgeArvin George Mineola, NY More articles by this author , Soroush Rais-BahramiSoroush Rais-Bahrami New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author , Zhamshid OkhunovZhamshid Okhunov New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author , Ardeshir RastinehadArdeshir Rastinehad Bethesda, MD More articles by this author , David SiegelDavid Siegel New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author , and Lane S. PalmerLane S. Palmer New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.413AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The treatment of varicocele by percutaneous embolization of the internal spermatic vein is a safe and effective technique with the potential of minimizing the morbidity traditionally associated with surgical management. The purpose of this study is to compare procedure characteristics of primary intervention versus salvage therapy for the treatment of clinically significant varicoceles in the pediatric population. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients under 22 years presenting for percutaneous varicocele embolization was performed. Patient demographic and procedural characteristics were collected including patency of gonadal vein, number of divisions of gonadal vein, presence of retroperitoneal or inguinal collaterals, flouroscopy time, number of coils used, and postoperative complications. Patients were stratified according to primary varicoceles versus those with prior failed surgical varicocelectomy. Data was analyzed using Chi-square analysis and t-test where appropriate. RESULTS A total of 62 patients were underwent treatment with a mean age of 16.3 years (11–21). Mean followup was 8.8 months. There was no significant difference in presence of inguinal or retroperitoneal collaterals, or gonadal vein patency between the groups. Additionally, no difference was seen in flouroscopy time though there a greater number of microembolization coils were used for salvage treatment (9 vs. 13.9, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS Salvage selective gonadal vein embolization is not associated with the presence of collateral veins. The primary reason for failed surgical varicocelectomy is a patent gonadal vein in the pediatric population. Salvage therapy did not result in increased radiation exposure © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e133-e134 Peer Review Report Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sylvia Montag New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author Arvin George Mineola, NY More articles by this author Soroush Rais-Bahrami New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author Zhamshid Okhunov New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author Ardeshir Rastinehad Bethesda, MD More articles by this author David Siegel New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author Lane S. Palmer New Hyde Park, NY More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract