Proton Pump Inhibitors Prescription Research Articles

Association between proton pump inhibitors and dementia risk: a Mendelian randomization study

Numerous observational studies suggest associations between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and dementia, but causal relationships remain uncertain. Using large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, we performed univariable Mendelian randomization (UVMR) analysis to assess the causality between five PPI types, and all-cause dementia and its five subtypes. Confounders were controlled through multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis to isolate PPIs’ direct effects on dementia. Heterogeneity and pleiotropy assessments, and leave-one-out analysis, were conducted to validate the robustness of our results. Initial UVMR estimates suggested that lansoprazole (odds ratio [OR] 1.291; 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.001–1.665; p = 0.049) and pantoprazole (OR 1.118; 95% CI 1.014–1.233; p = 0.025) potentially increased VD risk, with their respective direct associations also discovered in MVMR. Additionally, FTD was found to reversely increase rabeprazole use (OR 1.086; 95% CI 1.011–1.167; p = 0.023). However, after adjustment for the false discovery rate (FDR), none of these associations remained statistically significant (pFDR> 0.05). The robustness of our results is supported by consistent estimates across complementary MR methods and the absence of pleiotropy. Our study indicates no robust causality between PPI use and increased dementia risk. Thus, it is inappropriate to restrict clinically justified PPI prescriptions merely due to potential cognitive risks.

The 2-week wait pathway for suspected head and neck cancers in patients with throat and voice symptoms: referral patterns, common clinical practice and diagnostic efficacy of NICE guidelines.

The 2-week wait (2ww) referral pathway has been introduced into UK clinical practice to increase the early detection of cancer and improve survivals. The efficiency of this system for head and neck (H&N) cancers has been questioned over the years because of evidence of low pick-up rates. H&N cancers present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, particularly throat and voice symptoms. These symptoms need to be accurately interpreted together with risk factors if they are to be addressed adequately and overload of cancer facilities avoided. One of the most common outcomes of H&N 2ww referrals is laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a common condition that could be diagnosed and managed in the primary care setting with a prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) trials. We retrospectively analysed a cohort of consecutive patients referred on the 2ww pathway for throat and voice symptoms at University College London Hospital H&N cancer clinic during two months in 2019. A total of 101 patients (43.6% men, mean age 53.3 years) were included. Throat and voice symptoms were described as intermittent in 52.5% and non-lateralised in 88.1%. Diagnosis of LPR was made in 59.4% of the referrals. A PPI trial was prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) in only 7.9% of cases. The cancer pick-up rate in our cohort is 2.9%. An improved awareness of the symptoms of LPR could guide GPs to prescribe trials of PPIs in low-risk patients before rushing into a referral on a cancer pathway. This would improve the 2ww process on many levels, reduce the burden on the National Health Service and avoid patients' psychological distress.

Proton pump inhibitors in inpatients: Are we getting it right? A retrospective analysis.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed to hospitalized patients, but many of these prescriptions may not be based on evidence-based indications. It's important to understand that inappropriate prescribing of PPIs can lead to unnecessary medications and financial burdens. Unfortunately, there are not many recent studies exploring how often PPIs are prescribed and if they are being prescribed appropriately. The study aimed to assess the appropriateness of PPIs use among hospitalized patients. It evaluated the indications for PPIs use and determined whether the use of PPIs in hospitalized patients is justified or not. The study was conducted at Hamad General Hospital, a tertiary academic healthcare center in the state of Qatar. A retrospective observational study with 201 subjects, was conducted in general internal medicine wards at a tertiary hospital. Physician documentation and inpatient and outpatient medication prescriptions were analyzed for PPIs exposure. The appropriateness of exposure to PPIs is determined based on international recommendations. Of 533 hospitalized patients who were not critically ill, 201 (37.7%) were prescribed PPIs. The study found that 65.2% of the patients had no valid indication for PPIs exposure. Furthermore, 18% of patients were inappropriately prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis with PPIs even though they had a low risk for the development of ulcer disease. After discharge, 82.6% of patients were prescribed PPIs, with the most common indication (43%) being gastrointestinal ulcer prophylaxis. This study sheds light on the issue of overutilization of PPIs, specifically in non-critically ill hospitalized patients. It highlights the unnecessary continuation of PPI prescriptions at discharge and emphasizes the importance of physicians reevaluating PPI prescriptions periodically to ensure they are still necessary and discontinuing them when possible to avoid unwanted consequences.

Proton-pump inhibitor use in older adults: Public vs. Private Prescribing in Portugal

Abstract Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently overprescribed, posing challenges to patients and healthcare systems. In Portugal, the publicly funded National Health Service (NHS) provides universal coverage and reimburses the cost of medications regardless of the prescription origin. If private practices may benefit from longer consultation times allowing better prescription, they do not face any incentive to avoid over-prescription. We aimed to compare outpatient prescription trends, patterns, and costs of PPI among older adults in private and public sectors. Methods Nationwide retrospective ecological study on PPI prescribed for older adults in Portugal 2020-2022. Data on defined daily doses (DDD) and costs were obtained from a national public database by healthcare sector, sex (female/male), and age group (65-74, ≥75). We analysed trends, market share of DDD per 1000 older adults per day (DID), and mean cost per DDD (€/DDD) for all PPI substances. Results We observed a decrease in prescribed PPI from 349.0 DID in 2020 to 341.9 DID in 2022. Omeprazole (reference and cheaper substance) was the most prescribed drug for females and pantoprazole for males in the public sector. Similar pattern was observed among those aged ≥75 in the private sector while for those aged 65-74, esomeprazole was the most prescribed drug. Overall, the private sector prescribed PPI with a 20% higher price (0.126 €/DDD) than the public (0.106 €/DDD), with greater differences among the most expensive substances (rabeprazole +0.032 €/DDD; lansoprazole +0.029 €/DDD; esomeprazole +0.021 €/DDD). Conclusions PPI prescription followed similar trends in both sectors, but private practitioners tend to prescribe more expensive drugs, because their patients can afford them and because there is no incentive for more rational prescription. Since the NHS financially supports drugs prescribed in private practices, financial incentives towards rationale prescription should also fall in this sector. Key messages • Overall, the private sector prescribed PPI with a 20% higher price (0.126 €/DDD) than the public (0.106 €/DDD), with greater differences among the most expensive substances. • Since the National Health Service financially supports drugs prescribed in private practices, financial incentives towards rationale prescription should also fall in this sector.

Development and validation of a training course on proton pump inhibitor deprescription for general practitioners in a rural continuing medical education program: a pilot study

BackgroundDespite being cornerstone medications for managing gastrointestinal disorders, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have raised concerns due to inappropriate prescribing and overutilization, their potential side effects, and interactions with other medications. General practitioners (GPs) provide long-term patient follow-up and are targets to promote PPI deprescribing to reach the widest possible population. GPs practicing in rural settings encounter unique challenges as their numbers dwindle and their workload increases. Hence, targeted educational interventions are crucial to promote appropriate prescribing practices in such underserved areas.MethodsWe developed a continuing medical education (CME) program focused on PPI deprescribing for GPs in rural settings. The program comprised of an interactive training session featuring clinical cases, an open discussion, and distribution of educational materials. We assessed the program’s effectiveness using a two-level Kirkpatrick model, evaluating participant satisfaction and knowledge levels through pre- and post-course questionnaires.ResultsThirty-three GPs participated, with 61.9% working in semi-rural and 38.1% in rural areas (21 responded to the 1st questionnaire, 14 to the 2nd ). Median medical experience was 6 years, with 61.9% serving as internship supervisors. Despite 95.2% acknowledging PPI overprescription, none had previously participated in dedicated PPI CME programs. The open discussion session provided valuable insights into various topics related to PPI use and gastrointestinal health. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the program (average rating of 9.1/10) and 92.9% reported changes in practice, including increased awareness of inappropriate PPI prescriptions. Indeed, 92.9% of GPs identified inappropriate PPI use following the course. 57.1% of participants utilized the provided educational materials. The main practice changes observed included an increased reassessment rate of PPI indications (71.4% at each renewal after vs. 19% before, 28.6% non-systematically after vs. 66.8% before, 0% rarely after vs. 14.3% before; p = 0.006), the necessity for more than one consultation to deprescribe (64.3% after vs. 23.8% before; p = 0.021), systematic utilization of gradual cessation of PPI (100% vs. 61.9%; p = 0.039) and more frequent use of additional medication (92.9% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.022), primarily antiacids (92.3%).ConclusionsOur study underscores the effectiveness of targeted CME programs in promoting appropriate prescribing practices and enhancing knowledge among GPs in rural settings. Despite the challenges encountered in deprescribing PPI, the program facilitated proactive approaches in managing treatment discontinuation failures. Tailored educational interventions are essential for mitigating medication prescribing challenges and improving patient outcomes in rural primary care settings.Trial registrationsNot applicable.

Comparing budesonide treatment in eosinophilic esophagitis: a specialized center cohort versus a population-based cohort

Objective Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease. The budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT) is recommended as second-line treatment according to the Danish guideline. This study aimed to compare potential treatment disparities before BOT initiation, follow-up practices, clinico-histologic remission rates during BOT treatment, and adherence to the national guideline between the highly specialized EoE-Cph cohort and the population-based DanEoE cohort. Material and methods This cohort study compared 65 adult patients from the EoE-Cph cohort with 65 patients from the DanEoE cohort. All patients were diagnosed between 2015-2021. The diagnosis of EoE was defined according to the AGREE consensus. Data were extracted manually from medical records and registries. Results In the EoE-Cph cohort, 88% were prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) before started on BOT compared to 100% in the DanEoE cohort (p = 0.0035). Symptomatic follow-up occurred in 89% of EoE-Cph patients compared to 97% of DanEoE patients after BOT treatment (p = 0.0841). No difference was found between patients who underwent histologic follow-up after topical steroid treatment (83% versus 82%, p = 0.8162). Complete clinico-histologic remission was frequently observed, and no significant difference was observed between the two cohorts (67% versus 80%, p =0.1789). One out of four patients had conflicting symptomatic and histological responses. Conclusions This study did not provide conclusive evidence favoring the treatment of EoE patients exclusively at highly specialized EoE centers. However, the authors acknowledge that further evidence is necessary before considering changes in clinical practice. Conflicting treatment responses, and discontinuation of treatment due to side effects remains a notable concern.

Does Post Sleeve Gastrectomy Proton Pump Inhibitors Prescription Affect Complications, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and Mucosal Lesions? A Randomized Prospective Study

Does Post Sleeve Gastrectomy Proton Pump Inhibitors Prescription Affect Complications, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and Mucosal Lesions? A Randomized Prospective Study

Analysis of methotrexate use practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis

Background. Pharmacoepidemiological studies play a key role in optimizing pharmacotherapy for various diseases. In particular, significant progress in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) necessitates a detailed analysis of the consumption of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The modern therapeutic concept for these conditions focuses on achieving and maintaining long-term remission, which positions methotrexate (MTX) as a first-line agent, characterized by high effectiveness, safety and advantageous pharmacoeconomic profiles.Objective: to investigate the characteristics of MTX use in real clinical practice among patients with RA and PsA during outpatient medical care.Material and methods. The study comprised two parts: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of MTX consumption dynamics in 2018, 2020, and 2023 via ATC/DDD (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification, ATC; defined daily dose, DDD) methodology, and a longitudinal non-interventional pharmacoepidemiological study conducted in 2023 using the medical information system “BARS. Healthcare”.Results. The ATC/DDD analysis demonstrated a significant increase in MTX consumption among patients with RA and PsA: from 302,428.6 to 319,114.3 DDDs per 1,000 patients per year for RA, and from 28,157.1 to 310,771.6 DDDs per 1,000 patients per year for PsA in 2018 and 2023, respectively. The most frequently prescribed dose of MT was 15 mg/week. The primary therapeutic combination for 55.8% of patients was “MT + nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs”, with 32.7% of patients also receiving glucocorticoids (GCs) as part of this combination. The study identified a high frequency of prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors, GCs, and cholecalciferol, highlighting the activity of diseases under consideration, potential complications, and the necessity for the prevention of clinically significant drug interactions.Conclusions. The conducted study confirmed that MTX remains the main drug for the treatment of RA and PsA. The ATC/DDD analysis demonstrated a significant increase in MTX consumption in recent years, correlating with its therapeutic effectiveness and accessibility. The high frequency of concomitant prescriptions underscores the complexity of treating RA and PsA and the need for an interdisciplinary approach to ensure safety and efficacy of the therapy.

Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some of the most frequently prescribed medications, but they are often used inappropriately, either being prescribed without a clear indication or continued for longer than necessary. In such cases, deprescribing is recommended. However, despite its proven effectiveness, the implementation of deprescribing in clinical practice remains inconsistent and varied, making it challenging to identify the most effective strategies. The goal is to provide a comprehensive outline of deprescribing interventions for PPI therapy implemented across various settings and by different healthcare professionals. Methods: The study is designed to be a systematic review of the published literature. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 1989 (the first PPI on the market) to 30 September 2024 for articles assessing PPI deprescribing in adult patients, focusing on the implementation rate (primary outcome) or effects on symptoms (secondary outcome). Results: After screening, 66 studies were included, predominantly pragmatic trials (N = 32) or randomized controlled trials (N = 25). We found a variety of interventions promoting PPI deprescription. Collaborative efforts involving multiple healthcare professionals, the use of algorithms for clinical decision-making, and patient involvement have proven to be key elements in the most effective strategies. Discontinuing therapy may not be advisable in cases of recurrent symptoms, suggesting that on-demand therapy could be a recommended approach. Deprescribing is particularly relevant for individuals with mild illnesses and symptoms, where tapering can effectively mitigate the rebound symptoms often associated with abrupt discontinuation. Conclusions: Given the current prevalence of inappropriate PPI prescribing, it is imperative to raise awareness among both physicians and patients about the importance of the deprescribing process, which should be tailored to the specific needs of each patient, considering his/her medical history, current health status, and personal preferences.

Pattern of Prescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors: Evaluating Appropriateness and Factors Contributing to Their Adverse Effect Reaction Risk.

Background/Objectives: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are amongst the most commonly prescribed classes of medication. However, inappropriate PPI use can lead to several adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Limited data exist on factors contributing to the risk of ADRs associated with PPI prescribing patterns in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. This retrospective, cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence and the pattern of PPI use and to identify factors contributing to the risk of ADRs. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records of patients at Al-Qateef Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥40 years attending an outpatient medical care clinic. PPI prescribing patterns were categorized based on their dosage intensity into low-dose, medium-dose (MD), and high-dose (HD) categories. Binary and multinominal logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between PPI prescribing patterns and use, categorized by MD or HD, and patient characteristics, adjusted for significant covariates. Results are presented as adjusted odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: The study included 41,084 patients. The prevalence of PPI prescribing was 31%. PPI users were more frequently found to be females than males (52% vs. 50%, p = 0.013); they were also likely to be prescribed more medications (7 vs. 6, p < 0.001), but less likely to have gastritis-related diseases (34% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) compared to non-users. PPI HD users were more likely male (56% vs. 43%, p < 0.001), older (53 vs. 52 years, p < 0.001), and prescribed more medications (11.8 vs. 2.8, p < 0.001) compared to MD users. PPI usage was associated with concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15). An increasing number of prescribed medications was associated with HD usage (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.12-1.14), but negatively associated with MD usage (OR = 0.7 95% CI 0.69-0.71). Female gender was negatively associated with HD usage (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that 31% of the included cohort were prescribed PPI. Inappropriate PPI prescribing related to the drug's omission is a concern as PPI non-users presented with valid indications such as gastritis. Male gender and increasing NPM were the common factors contributing to increased risk of PPI ADR. This study points to the importance of re-evaluating PPI use to ensure effective therapy with minimum risks of ADR.

Prophylactic Proton Pump Inhibitors in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Impact and Underprescription in a French Multicentric Cohort.

Appropriate prescription of Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains an important concern amid the rising overuse. A gap exists in the literature regarding the benefit of PPI prophylaxis and the consequences of underprescription in patients at risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). This study aims to describe the characteristics of hemorrhage in relation to PPI use in patients experiencing UGIB, with a focus on high-risk individuals requiring gastroprotection. Data from a French multicentric cohort of patients experiencing UGIB were analyzed. Patients using PPI were compared to those without PPI considering bleeding etiologies and outcomes of peptic ulcer disease (PUD)-related hemorrhage. The rate of PPI use and its effect on bleeding characteristics in high-risk populations, defined based on international guidelines, were also assessed. Among 2497 included patients, 31.1% were on PPI at bleeding onset. PPI users exhibited a significantly lower rate of PUD-related bleeding in comparison with those without PPI (24.7 vs 40.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Similar difference was observed in high-risk populations, of whom, only 40.3% had gastroprotection with PPI before bleeding onset. PPI prophylaxis, however, did not influence the severity of bleeding in the general study population or in high-risk groups. Multivariate analysis identified age, comorbidities, and having more than two anti-thrombotic agents as predictors of severe bleeding. PPI users appear to have a lower rate of bleeding ulcers compared to non-users. However, underprescription in high-risk groups raises the need for standardized care to ensure appropriate PPI use.

Proton Pump Inhibitors Worsen Colorectal Cancer Outcomes in Patients Treated with Bevacizumab

Background: Approximately one-third of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and treated with bevacizumab are prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs). However, there is limited data on the effects of PPIs and H2RAs in these patients. To investigate the oncological outcomes of PPI and H2RA use in CRC patients treated with bevacizumab, we performed a retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry Database from 2005 to 2020. Methods: In CRC patients treated with bevacizumab, the PPI users and H2RA users were matched with patients without acid-reducing agents (ARAs) by 1:4 propensity score matching. PPI users and H2RA users were matched with propensity scoring in a 1:1 ratio. We divided patients into 4 cumulative PPI dosage levels to assess the dose–response relationship. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Results: Compared with ARA non-users, both H2RA users and PPI users were associated with reduced overall survival. PPI users were associated with more significant negative effects on overall survival. Compared with H2RA users, PPI users were associated with lower 5-year overall survival (aHR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31) and cancer-specific survival (aHR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.09–1.31). A similar dose–response relationship was observed for PPI users in terms of 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific overall survival. Conclusions: Compared to H2AR use, PPI use was associated with dose-dependent poorer oncological outcomes in metastatic CRC patients treated with bevacizumab.

Relationship between proton pump inhibitor prescription and asthma exacerbation among adult patients: a self-controlled case series study.

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are empirically used to treat asthma symptoms such as cough; however, the effectiveness of PPI on asthma exacerbation has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between PPI use and asthma exacerbation using a large administrative claims database in Japan. We conducted a self-controlled case series using the JMDC Claims Database (JMDC, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The cases included adult patients with asthma who were prescribed PPI and experienced at least one outcome event between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of hospital admissions and unscheduled outpatient clinic visits due to asthma exacerbation. We also conducted stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), asthma severity, and the number of allergic comorbidities. A total of 7379 eligible patients were included in the study. PPI prescription was associated with a decrease in the composite outcomes (incidence rate ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93). However, PPI prescriptions did not affect the outcomes of hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.10). Stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of GERD, asthma severity (except for severe asthma), and the number of allergic comorbidities yielded consistent results. PPI use was associated with a moderate decrease in asthma exacerbation, regardless of the patient profile. However, this effect was not as strong as the prevention of hospital admissions, and outcome events were not prevented in patients with severe asthma.

Impact of surgical technique on gastroesophageal reflux disease after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide observational study

BackgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained increasing popularity worldwide, yet concerns persist regarding the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) postoperatively. ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of technical aspects of LSG, specifically bougie size and distance from the pylorus to resection line edge, on the risk of developing symptomatic GERD within 2years following surgery. SettingData from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg) and the National Prescribed Drug Register were utilized for this analysis. MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted encompassing all LSG patients in Sweden between 2012 and 2020 who did not receive preoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions. Patients were categorized based on bougie size and pyloric distance. Regular PPI use, defined as a dispensed prescription of more than 300 tablets per year, was employed as a proxy measure of symptomatic GERD and was compared between the groups. ResultsThe study included 7,435 patients with complete data on dispensed PPI prescription both preoperatively and throughout the 2-year follow-up period. Information on bougie size and pyloric distance was available for 97.4% and 84.9%, respectively. Narrower bougie size and greater pyloric distance were associated with increased risk of regular PPI use postsurgery. Advanced age and female sex were independent risk factors for post-LSG regular PPI use, while initial body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (%TWL), and comorbidities showed no significant associations. ConclusionsUsing a narrow bougie and initiating resection at a greater distance from the pylorus were associated with higher risk of symptomatic de novo GERD following LSG.

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study for the Efficacy of Potassium Competitive Acid Blockers (P-CABs) versus Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) in the First and the Second Line Eradication Regimens for H. pylori in Egyptian Patients

Abstract Background Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) is a type of curved or spiral flagellated, Gram- negative micro-aerophilic bacterium that has been co-existing with human for over 5000 years. Since being discovered in 1984, H. pylori has been recognized as the main risk factor for gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric carcinoma and gastric mucosa- associated lymphoma. Aim of the Work So the aim of the work was to compare the effectiveness of Vonaprazan based therapy vs PPI based therapy for the eradication of H.Pylori infection in treatment naive and experienced patients. Patients and Methods The current study was conducted on 232 patients selected from Tropical Medicine Department at Ain Shams University Hospitals and outpatient clinic of Tropical Medicine Department who were diagnosed to be H.pylori infection positive by the use of “H.pylori Antigen in stool test”, The recruited patients who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of the following using a computer based randomization program and were divided into 2 groups and 4 arms according to the used treatment regimens. Group 1 included H.pylori treatment naïve patients, which was then subdivided into Arms 1 and 2 according to the prescription of PPI vs P-CABs as a part of the classical triple H.pylori eradication regimen including “Clarithromycin and Penicillin”. Group 2 included H.pylori treatment experienced patients, which was then subdivided into Arms 3 and 4 according to the prescription of PPI vs P-CABs as a part of the LOAD H.pylori eradication regimen including “Levofloxacin, Doxycycline and Nanazoxide”. Results No statistical significant difference could be obtained between the P-CABs and the PPIs as a part of H.Pylori eradication regimens among the treatment naive and experienced patients. In Arm 1out of 58 patients, 3 patients “58.6%” achieved H.pylori eradication as per intention to treat analysis (ITT), while according to the per protocol analysis (PP), the percentage was “64.2%”, whereas those in Arm 2 out of 58 patients, 29 patients “50%”achieved H.pylori eradication according to ITT analysis, while according to PP analysis, the percentage was “56.9%”, while those in in Arm 3 out of 58 patients, “50%” achieved H.pylori eradication according to ITT analysis, while according to PP analysis, the percentage was “72.5%”, Whereas those in Arm 4 out of 58 patients, “43.1%”, achieved H.pylori eradication according to ITT analysis, while according to PP analysis, the percentage was “59.5%” Conclusion Results of eradication in P-CABs based group is comparable to that of the PPI based group. Treatment experienced groups showed lower eradication rates which indicates increased H.pylori resistance. It appears that the adherence was more in the triple therapy group than that of the quadruple therapy group which was reflected on the eradication rates. LOAD regimen adopted in the current study for H.pylori eradication in Egyptian patients resulted in a lower eradication rates compared to studies reported from other countries.

The Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients Aged 65 Years and Above in an Academic Tertiary Referral Hospital

Abstract Background Proton Pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some of the world's most frequently prescribed medications. While PPIs are generally well tolerated, they do carry with them several associated adverse effects ranging from electrolyte disturbances to altering the absorption and thus the effectiveness of other co-administered medications to more severe concerns such as high frequencies of gastrointestinal infections and possibly even respiratory tract infections. Being so commonly prescribed, often for inappropriate or unknown indications, they become an important and relatively easy target for review. Methods A retrospective review of electronic health care records of individuals aged 65 years and older admitted under general medical teams in an academic tertiary referral hospital over the course of a calendar month was undertaken to evaluate typical PPI usage encountered, including frequency of PPI prescriptions at both admission and discharge, recorded indications, and impact of review by clinical pharmacists. Results Of the 77 individuals included in this study, 59 (77%) were prescribed a PPI at some point during admission. Of the patients surviving to discharge, 98% (n = 53) remained on a PPI at discharge. One patient (2%) had a PPI stopped before discharge. Indications for a PPI were explicitly stated in 25% (n = 15) of patients prescribed a PPI. A further 27% (n = 16) could have an indication derived from information within the electronic health record. One (2%) patient was prescribed a PPI, and a duration was indicated. Conclusion Most PPI prescriptions lack documentation regarding the indication and intended duration and may be inappropriately prescribed. The frequency of usage of PPIs in an older population that is more at risk of the adverse effects of PPIs makes them ideal targets and models for evaluation of prescribing practices and deprescribing efforts.

Prescribing practices for Proton pump inhibitors among primary care physicians in England.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) the most frequently prescribed drug class globally, are often overused. To assess PPI prescribing practice in England. Electronic medical record (EMR) evaluation from 62 primary care GP practices. Adult patients on continuous PPI treatment (repeat prescription or≥4 acute prescriptions 6 months before data extraction) were included (August 2021-June 2022) to compare PPI prescribing practices vs National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GORD and dyspepsia management) and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (clopidogrel-PPI interaction) guidelines. We identified 77,356 patients on continuous PPI treatment. The most common (68%) diagnosis recorded in patients' EMRs and indicated for PPI use was gastroprotection, although 62% had no recorded indication. Of these 62% patients, 40% had no medication review in the preceding year. Among those with diagnoses indicated for≤3 months of PPI therapy (34%), 99% received their first PPI prescription≥3 months previously. Of patients with diagnoses indicated for long-term treatment (4%), 41% had no medication review in the preceding year. Furthermore, 18% of patients using omeprazole or esomeprazole were also prescribed clopidogrel, and 19% of those prescribed treatments associated with gastrointestinal risk (N=14,826) were not prescribed PPIs. This study shows that PPI prescribing in England is not in alignment with existing clinical guidelines and highlights the need for appropriate measures to increase awareness of overuse and support deprescribing where appropriate.

Effects of Prolonged Proton-Pump Inhibitor Use on Renal Dysfunction and Bone Fragility: A Retrospective Study.

Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) consists of a short-duration trial, according to guidelines. Long-term usage is appropriate under certain indications. Literature has increasingly documented an adverse effect profile of PPIs, including kidney disease and bone fragility. To investigate the rate of occurrence of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients using PPI therapy for longer than the recommended trial period of 8 weeks. Retrospective cohort analysis of a single-site primary care clinic. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with PPI prescriptions longer than 8 weeks were included. Information regarding PPI prescriptions, demographics, and medical diagnoses was collected. The search discovered 293 PPI-users and 1908 never-PPI-users. Demographics varied, with a P-value <0.05 in age, body mass index (BMI), and black population (higher in PPI group). The PPI cohort featured higher rates of osteoporosis/osteopenia and CKD (P < 0.001). The odds ratios (ORs) of diagnosis with PPI use was 2.91 (95% CI = [1.692, 4.979]) in osteoporosis/osteopenia. The OR was 1.14 (95% CI = [1.141, 2.229]) in CKD and PPI use but higher with diabetes, elevated BMI, black race, and male gender. We observed increased occurrence rates of osteoporosis, or osteopenia, and CKD in patients with prolonged PPI use. Demographics varied in age, BMI, and black race proportion. A logistic regression revealed increased likelihood of kidney disease and osteoporosis/osteopenia in association with PPI use. These results add to the evidence regarding long-term PPI use and the development of these conditions, but additional studies are needed.

Routine Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period is Associated With Decreased Rates of 2-Year Revision Surgery After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in conjunction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their gastroprotective effects. In animal studies, it has been suggested that PPIs have immunosuppressive effects and impair fracture healing; however, the association between PPI use and adverse events following THA and TKA has not been well-studied. MethodsAn administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2019. The experimental group consisted of patients who did not have a prior history of gastrointestinal bleeding or gastroesophageal reflux disease and who received a PPI prescription in the perioperative period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create control cohorts of patients who did not have any PPI prescription filled, also matching for age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. This same cohort selection and matching procedure was then repeated for patients undergoing elective TKA. In total, 11,450 patients were studied (3,103 TKA + PPI, 2,622 THA + PPI, 3,103 TKA controls, and 2,622 THA controls). The mean age was 64 years (range, 38 to 94), and 57% were women. Significance was considered at P < 0.05. ResultsPerioperative PPI prescription in TKA patients was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause revision (3.0 versus 4.1%, P < 0.01) and periprosthetic joint infection (1.0 versus 1.8%, P < 0.01). In THA patients, PPI prescription was associated with a lower all-cause revision rate (2.8 versus 4.0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found between PPI and non-PPI groups for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or surgical site infection in either cohort. ConclusionsPatients receiving routine PPI prescriptions in the perioperative period surrounding TKA and THA have a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery, and perioperative PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA. As these results conflict with the few previous studies performed on this topic, additional controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between PPI use and adverse events after THA and TKA.

Significance of serological atrophic gastritis on proton pump inhibitor prescriptions and referrals to gastroscopy in the general population.

We aimed to investigate whether individuals with low pepsinogen I levels differed from those with normal pepsinogen I levels in terms of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use, referral to gastroscopy, and findings on gastroscopy. Serum pepsinogen I was measured in 518 persons (mean age 51.6, SD 8.8; 49% women). A medical chart review focused on PPI prescriptions and gastroscopic findings in the follow-up period. Patients with serological atrophic gastritis (pepsinogen I < 28 μg/L) had higher body mass index (27.5 vs 26.2 kg/m2; P = 0.007), were less likely to be current smokers (8% vs 17%; P = 0.025), and had higher prevalence of Helicobacter pylori seropositivity (57% vs 36%; P < 0.001) compared with those without. During follow-up (mean 21.4 years, SD 6.5 years), the patients with serological atrophic gastritis had more often findings of atrophic gastritis or gastric polyps on gastroscopy (20% vs 8%; P < 0.001), despite no differences in the mean number of gastroscopies per 1000 person-years (33 vs 23; P = 0.19) and the mean prescribed PPI dose (omeprazole equivalents) per year (1064 mg vs 1046 mg; P = 0.95). Persons with serological atrophic gastritis had lower odds of being prescribed PPIs at least once (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.58 [0.35-0.96]), but there was no significant difference in the chance of being referred to gastroscopy at least once (1.15 [0.70-1.96]). Persons with serological atrophic gastritis were less likely to be prescribed PPIs. Persons with serological atrophic gastritis had more often gastric polyps and atrophic gastritis when referred to gastroscopy.