Tramadol Prescription Research Articles

An Overview of Opioid Prescription Patterns among Non-Opioid Users Following Emergency Department Admission.

The evolving landscape of opioid prescription practices necessitates a comprehensive understanding of emerging patterns, particularly among new opioid users discharged from emergency departments. This study delves into the intricate realm of opioid utilization by elucidating the prevalence of their prescriptions. A retrospective analysis of electronic health records was conducted, including a cohort of 71 patients who received opioid prescriptions upon discharge from emergency departments from 1 January 2022 to 30 June 2022. Demographic characteristics and prescription details were systematically examined. This study illuminates tramadol's prominence, with 84% of prescriptions and a Defined Daily Dose (DDD) morphine equivalent of 60 mg, as the primary choice as a new opioid, a finding that draws attention due to the closely aligned dosages with morphine equivalents. This discovery prompts a critical reassessment of tramadol's therapeutic role, considering its multifaceted nature encompassing serotonergic effects and heightened fall risks. This study advocates for a nuanced and vigilant approach to tramadol prescription, cognizant of its potential risks and therapeutic implications, and highlights the imperative of optimizing data quality and traceability within electronic health records to enhance patient care and facilitate future research endeavors.

Chiropractic spinal manipulation and likelihood of tramadol prescription in adults with radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study using US data

ObjectivesPatients receiving chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) for low back pain (LBP) are less likely to receive any opioid prescription for subsequent pain management. However, the likelihood of specifically being prescribed...

Risk Factors for Opioid Misuse, Abuse, and Dependence Among Pain Clinic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study at King Khalid University Hospital during 2020.

BACKGROUND Physicians are faced with the risk of patients developing opioid use disorders (OUDs) when prescribing patients opioids for long periods of time. Therefore, it is highly recommended to continuously monitor and evaluate long-term non-cancer pain patients who are prescribed opioids. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of OUDs in 103 patients with active opioid prescriptions attending the Pain Clinic at King Khalid University Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted at King Khalid University Hospital's pain clinic from 2020 to 2022. A list of all patients attending the Pain Clinic with an opioid prescription was provided by the hospital. Through telephone interviews, consent was secured followed by the collection of demographic variables and prescription-related variables. Additionally, patients were asked to complete the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST 3.1) opioid questionnaire. RESULTS Most of the 103 patients were at moderate risk for abuse (91.3%), while a smaller percentage were at high risk (dependence) (5.8%) and low risk (misuse) (2.9%). Tramadol was the most-prescribed opioid (43.7%). Young age (<50) (Z=2.534; P=0.011), opioid use for more than 90 days (Z=2.788; P=0.005), and the prescription of tramadol (Z=4.124; P<0.001) were associated with higher risk of OCDs. CONCLUSIONS Younger patients, opioid use >90 days, and tramadol are associated with a higher risk of opioid misuse. However, further studies on a larger scale and in various settings are needed to provide evidence accurately reflecting the general population, as this study focused on the population of pain clinic attendees.

Narcotic Use and Prescribing Trends Among Workers Compensation Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Previous studies have shown that workers compensation patients (WC) have worse outcomes, and higher complications rates after orthopaedic surgery. Despite orthopaedic surgeons being the third highest prescribers of narcotic pain medication in the United States there have been no studies to specifically evaluate narcotic use among the WC population. The purpose of this study was to investigate narcotic use among WC patients who underwent foot or ankle operative procedures compared with a procedure matched control group. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for WC and non-WC patients ages 18 to 70 years old who underwent foot (CPT 28001-28899) or ankle (CPT 27600-27899) procedures in an orthopaedic surgery practice from October 2017 through January 2020. Data collection included demographics, social, surgical, perioperative follow-up and complications. Outcomes measures were timing and number of narcotic prescriptions, total morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and procedure type. Data analysis was performed with SPSS version 28. Comparisons were conducted with Mann-Whitney U test, chi square test, or Fisher’s exact test. Power analysis determined sample size with a 0.05 alpha level, 0.80 power, and 0.5 effect size. Results: 142 total patients met inclusion criteria, with 71 WC patients and 71 non-WC patients. There were no differences regarding the type of foot or ankle procedure performed (p=0.598). WC patients had double the number of overall narcotic prescriptions (median 2 vs 1; p &lt; 0.001). WC patients were prescribed in total 1,125 oxycodone MME and 871.8 hydrocodone MME (P &lt; 0.001), versus 750 oxycodone MME and 450 hydrocodone MME among the non-WC group (p &lt; .008). There was no difference in the number of tramadol prescriptions (p = 0.571). WC patients experienced more days between the date of last narcotic prescription and both index surgery date (median 27 vs 1, p = 0.001) and initial clinic visit date (median 105 vs 49, p = 0.002). Conclusion: This data demonstrates that WC patients portend worse outcomes and utilize narcotics at twice the rate and for longer periods of time post-operatively than non-WC patients. Increased narcotic use may potentiate narcotic dependence and likely leads to worse outcomes. Treating physicians must be aware of these trends in order to best manage these patients. Physicians may need to have longer discussions with WC patients regarding narcotic use post operatively as well as about outcomes and goals of surgery. Physicians should set early expectations with WC patients and clear limits on the amount of narcotics they are willing to prescribe postoperatively.

Use of Tramadol vs Traditional Opioids and Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.

Use of traditional opioids (TOs) for pain management has been associated with adverse outcomes among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). It is unknown if similar associations exist for tramadol, a partial opioid agonist and serotonin and norephinephrine reuptake inhibitor. We sought to compare adverse outcomes associated with tramadol vs TOs in an IBD population. This nationwide cohort study included adults with IBD diagnosed from 1995 to 2021 in Denmark with subsequent prescriptions for tramadol or TOs. For each analgesic, 2 populations were assessed: initial users (first prescription) and persistent users (first 3 consecutive prescriptions within 365 days). Outcomes included infection, bowel obstruction/ileus, IBD surgery, and mortality within 90 days after the initial use index date (date of first prescription) and within 365 days after the persistent use index date (date of third prescription). Odds ratios adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and IBD severity were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. We identified 37 377 initial users and 15 237 persistent users of tramadol or TOs. Initial users of tramadol had lower adjusted odds of infection (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.99), bowel obstruction/ileus (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.03), and mortality (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.35-0.55), and a higher adjusted odds of IBD-related surgery (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.60) vs initial users of TOs. Similar results were found for persistent users. Tramadol was associated with lower odds of infection, bowel obstruction/ileus, and mortality vs TOs among patients with IBD. These associations may be impacted by residual confounding.

The 2017 North Carolina STOP Act is Associated With an Accelerated Decrease in Opioid Dispensing: A Statewide Analysis, 2013-2019.

This study aimed to: 1) quantify the dispensing and days' supply of opioid prescriptions prior to and after the NC STOP Act went into effect among Medicare Part D beneficiaries; 2) evaluate how the STOP Act impacted physician assistant and nurse practitioner opioid prescribing; and 3) evaluate whether the NC STOP Act is associated with reductions in opioid prescriptions' days' supply among Medicare Part D beneficiaries. This was a secondary analysis of Medicare Part D Public Use Files for 2013-2019. Only North Carolina providers and select Schedule II (CII) and III (CIII) drugs and tramadol (CV) were included in the analysis. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to analyze the data. In 2013, there were population-adjusted 180,565.2/100,000 claims for the included CII and CIII opioids, which decreased to 79,329.12/100,000 claims in 2019. Each of the multivariable Poisson regression models indicates a reduction in per-provider populationadjusted claims and days' supply after the NC STOP Act went into effect for both selected CII and CIII medications and for tramadol. The results also indicate that the number of prescriptions for CII, CIII, and tramadol decreased over time. Due to the nature of the observational study design, we cannot conclude that the 2017 legislation had an effect on populationadjusted claims for certain CII and CIII opioids. Since 2013 there has been a decreasing trend in certain CII and CIII opioids dispensations in Medicare beneficiaries, and the trend accelerated after the STOP Act went into effect.

What Changes Have Occurred in Opioid Prescriptions and the Prescribers of Opioids Before TKA and THA? A Large National Registry Study.

What Changes Have Occurred in Opioid Prescriptions and the Prescribers of Opioids Before TKA and THA? A Large National Registry Study.

Tramadol utilization among patients with higher risk of adverse drug events: A claims analysis of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage members.

To assess prescribing of tramadol among patients with contraindications and higher risks of adverse events in a large population of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage members. We performed a cross-sectional analysis evaluating tramadol utilization in patients with higher risk of adverse outcomes. This study utilized 2016-2017 data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Patients with at least one tramadol prescription without a cancer or sickle cell diagnosis during the study period. We first determined if tramadol was prescribed among patients with contraindications or risk factors for adverse outcomes. We then determined if patient demographic or clinical factors were associated with the use of tramadol in these higher-risk scenarios using multivariable logistic regression models. Among patients with at least one prescription for tramadol, 19.66 percent (99 percent CI: 19.57-19.75) concurrently received an interacting cytochrome P450 isoenzyme medication, 19.24 percent (99 percent CI: 19.15-19.33) concurrently received a serotonergic medication, and 7.93 percent (99 percent CI: 7.88-8.00) concurrently received a benzodiazepine. Additionally, 1.59 percent (99 percent CI: 1.56-1.61) of patients who received tramadol also had a seizure disorder, while 0.55 percent (99 percent CI: 0.53-0.56) of patients were under the age of 18. Overall, nearly one in three patients (31.17 percent) received tramadol in the presence of at least one of these risks (99 percent CI: 31.06-31.27). Almost one in three patients prescribed tramadol had a clinically significant drug interaction or contraindication for use, suggesting that prescribers often disregard these concerns. Real-world studies are needed to better understand the likelihood of harms associated with the use of tramadol in these contexts.

Tramadol as a patient-initiated component of multimodal pain management: a pilot study of 364 lower limb arthroplasty cases.

Multimodal therapy (MMT) for analgesia following joint arthroplasty continues to reduce cost and the requirement of strong opioids post-operatively. Tramadol immediate release is an important MMT component providing synergistic pain relief via dual μ-opioid agonism and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition. Case reports have shown tramadol when combined with antidepressants cause serotonin syndrome, but this has yet to be demonstrated in larger studies. We undertook a pilot study assessing the functional outcomes and incidence of side effects associated with tramadol in lower limb arthroplasty patients with a focus on those taking concomitant antidepressants. Primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasties performed in 2018-2019 by a senior surgeon were included (n=364). Patient records were assessed to determine pain scores, length of hospitalization, prescription of tramadol and antidepressants, self-reported side effects and previous adverse reactions associated with tramadol. Nine-five percentage of patients had been prescribed tramadol, and 16% had concurrent prescription of tramadol and one or more antidepressants. The total rate of adverse effects associated with tramadol before and during the study was 7% (n=25) including two cases of concomitant tramadol and antidepressant use. For patients on tramadol, median 2-week post-operative pain score was 1.5 (IQR 1-2.5) out of 10 and hospitalization length was 1 (IQR 1-2) days. Tramadol immediate release appears to be well tolerated among our patient population with no significantly increased prevalence of side effects when co-administered with low and moderate dose antidepressants.

P717 Use of tramadol versus traditional opioids and adverse outcomes of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: a Danish nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) commonly suffer from pain that requires analgesic therapies such as tramadol and opioids. However, use of traditional opioids (TOs) has been associated with severe infections and mortality in this population. Tramadol, a partial agonist of opioid receptors, has been considered to have less abuse potential compared to TOs. It is unknown if tramadol is associated with fewer IBD-related complications compared to TOs. Methods This was a Danish nationwide cohort study examining adverse outcomes associated with use of tramadol vs TOs in the IBD population. Patients with IBD (ICD-10 codes K50 and K51) diagnosed 1995-2021 in Denmark with subsequent prescriptions for tramadol or TOs were included. For each drug exposure, two populations were defined: initial users (“IUs”; first prescription after IBD diagnosis) and persistent users (“PUs”; first 3 consecutive prescriptions within 365 days after IBD diagnosis). Outcomes included severe (hospital-diagnosed) infection, bowel obstruction or ileus, IBD surgery, and mortality within 90 days after the IU index date (i.e. date of first prescription) and within 365 days after the PU index date (i.e. date of third prescription) (Figure 1). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations of tramadol vs TOs with outcomes while adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, year of IBD diagnosis, IBD type, IBD duration, and prior immunomodulator use, corticosteroid use, IBD hospitalization, severe infection, bowel obstruction or ileus, and IBD surgery within 6 months before the index date. A sensitivity analysis was performed in which patients with any diagnosis of a malignant neoplasm (ICD-10 codes C00-99) &amp;lt;1 year prior to the first tramadol or TO prescription were excluded. Results We identified 37,377 IUs and 15,237 PUs of tramadol or TOs. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. IUs of tramadol had lower odds of severe infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.99), bowel obstruction or ileus (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53-1.03), and mortality (aOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35-0.55), and higher odds of IBD surgery (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.60) vs TOs. PUs of tramadol had lower odds of severe infection (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86), bowel obstruction or ileus (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.85), and mortality (aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.28-0.44) but no difference in IBD surgery (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.86-1.47) vs TOs (Table 2). Results were unchanged after excluding patients with malignancy (Table 3). Conclusion Use of tramadol was associated with lower odds of severe infection, bowel obstruction or ileus, and mortality vs use of TOs among patients with IBD. Safety comparisons of tramadol to other analgesics are needed.

Tramadol Versus Codeine in Hand Surgery.

IntroductionTramadol and codeine are both commonly prescribed in the setting of surgery or injury to the upper extremity. Despite their comparable strength in terms of opioid receptor affinity, the drugs differ pharmacologically and thus are not completely interchangeable.MethodsThis study analyzes all prescriptions for codeine and tramadol by a group of hand surgeons over a one-year period and tests the central hypothesis that the prescribing and refill patterns of these two drugs would be similar.ResultsDespite similar prescription amounts in terms of morphine equivalents, patients receiving tramadol required prescription refills at a significantly higher amount than those receiving codeine, and these individuals tended to be older. Additionally, patients treated nonoperatively were prescribed significantly more tramadol than those treated surgically.ConclusionOur findings suggest that codeine and tramadol are not equivalent in managing upper extremity pain. Further study is needed to articulate the situations in which physicians and patients are better served by tramadol versus codeine.

Multiple suicide attempts associated with addiction to tramadol

BackgroundThe opioid tramadol is used as analgesic drug, and more recently was also proposed for the management of major depressive disorder. However, growing evidence suggests a link between opioid system dysfunction and suicidal behaviors, raising the question of tramadol use in view of the high addictive and suicidal risk. Here, we present the case of a young adult woman with multiple suicide attempts related to tramadol addiction.Case presentationA 25-year-old woman was admitted for suicide attempt by phlebotomy in the Department of Psychiatric Emergency and Acute Care, Montpellier (France), in March 2020. The suicide attempt occurred 3 days after an abrupt tramadol withdrawal. In 2018, due to spinal disc herniation, she had a first prescription of tramadol to which she became addicted. The patient described an effect on psychological pain and suicidal ideation. However, she had to increase tramadol dose to obtain the desired effects, and for several months her intake was 2 000 mg per day. When she could not obtain tramadol any longer, suicidal ideation and psychological pain increased, leading to the suicide attempt. At the time of a worldwide opioid crisis that contributes to increasing suicidal behaviors, this case raises questions about tramadol prescription (often considered to be less addictive and with lower abuse potential) to individuals at risk of suicide.

Tramadol prescribed at discharge is associated with lower odds of chronic opioid use after elective total joint arthroplasty

IntroductionWe aimed to study the association between tramadol prescribed at discharge (after elective total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) surgery) and chronic opioid use postoperatively.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study queried the...

Urinalysis based assessment of compliance and drug use patterns in patients prescribed tramadol: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care centre.

Strict adherence to pharmacological dosage regimens is a prerequisite to the success of most treatments, particularly for patients in drug abuse programs. The compliance of tramadol, an atypical non-scheduled narcotic analgesic, using objective method has not been adequately studied in an Indian setting. To evaluate the compliance and pattern of drug use among opioid-dependent subjects prescribed tramadol based on urinalysis. Fifty male opioid-dependent patients (ICD 10), seeking treatment at a tertiary de-addiction treatment centre of North India on tramadol prescription for atleastpast four weeks were included. Self-reported substance use was recorded using semi-structured proforma. Ten ml of urine was collected for the assessment of compliance of tramadol of other substance use (morphine, buprenorphine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, cannabis, benzodiazepines, pheniramine). All these drugs were analyzed using the immunoassay-based Cassette test and Gas Chromatography in human urine. Mean age of the participants was 42.8 years and the mean duration of opioid use was 15.9years. The urine specimen of all subjects tested positive for tramadol. Urinalysis revealed benzodiazepines, cannabis, and pheniramine to be the most common substances of use in this population. It was seen that agreement of self-reporting and urine test results was good for morphine (κ=0.558) and cannabis (κ=0.312) and was poor for buprenorphine, pentazocine, and pheniramine. The study demonstrates the continued use of several illicit or non-prescribed medications in a medication-assisted opioid treatment population. The results affirm the reliability of urinalysis as an adjunct for testing compliance in such a population.

Increase of high-risk tramadol use and harmful consequences in France from 2013 to 2018: Evidence from the triangulation of addictovigilance data.

AimsThe aim of this paper is to assess recent developments in non‐medical tramadol use, tramadol use disorder, illegal procurement and deaths.MethodsThis study used repeated cross‐sectional analysis of data collected nationwide from 2013 to 2018. Analysis was conducted through multisource monitoring of the French Addictovigilance Network of: (1) validated reports of high‐risk tramadol use, (2) record systems collecting information from toxicology experts investigating analgesic‐related deaths (DTA) and deaths related to substance abuse (DRAMES), and pharmacists for forged prescriptions (OSIAP), and (3) survey of drug users, with investigation of patterns of use while visiting addiction‐specialised institutions (OPPIDUM).ResultsDespite a plateauing level of tramadol exposure in the French population, the proportion of tramadol reports increased 1.7‐fold (187 cases in 2018, 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.74–3.63%), versus 1.9% (95% CI: 1.49–2.42% in 2013). Trends were similar in OSIAP: 11.9% of forged prescriptions in 2018 (95% CI: 10.56–13.45%); 1.7‐fold increase; in OPPIDUM: 0.76% (95% CI: 0.55–1.02); 2.2‐fold increase; and DRAMES: 3.2% of drug abuse‐related deaths in 2018 (95% CI: 1.89–5.16) versus 1.7% in 2013 (95% CI: 0.65–3.84). Tramadol was the primary opioid in analgesic‐related deaths in DTA (45% in 2018). Two profiles of high‐risk tramadol users were identified: (1) patients treated for pain or with tramadol persistence when pain disappeared (mainly women; mean age 44 years), and (2) individuals with non‐medical use for psychoactive effects (mainly men; mean age 36 years).ConclusionThe triangulation of the data obtained through addictovigilance monitoring evidenced a recent increase in high‐risk tramadol use. These findings have a practical impact on the limitation of the maximal duration of tramadol prescriptions.

Exposure to immediate-release tramadol in children 6 years and under – a nationwide French poison control center study

Introduction Data regarding immediate-release (IR)-tramadol exposures in children remain sparse. We aimed to investigate the incidence of IR-tramadol exposures in ≤6-year-old children, to describe the characteristics and resulting outcome of ingestions involving IR-tramadol alone, and to estimate a clinically relevant toxic dose in this population. Methods Retrospective analysis of IR-tramadol exposures in ≤6-year-old children, collected by the French Poison Control Centers (PCCs) in 2003–2019. The incidence was estimated using IR-tramadol prescription data from the Health Improvement Network database (the French version of THIN). The Poison severity score (PSS) was used to grade severity. Results We found 1260 IR-tramadol exposures in ≤6-year-old children. The number of cases per 100,000 IR-tramadol-treated patients increased over time (p < .0001). One hundred forty-five cases involving IR-tramadol alone were analyzed. The median age was 3.0 years (IQR: 1.9, 4.0), the M/F ratio was 1.5 and the median dose was 5.0 mg/kg (IQR 3.3–11.1). Half of the children (49.7%) remained asymptomatic (PSS0) while 29.6% and 14.5% developed minor (PSS1) or moderate-to-severe (PSS2–PSS3) neurological symptoms, respectively. Twelve children developed respiratory depression. No seizures and no fatality were reported. All symptomatic children recovered within 24 h. The ingested IR-tramadol dose was positively correlated with the PSS (p < .0001). Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve approach (area under the curve, 0.92; p < .001), ingestion of ≥7.4 mg/kg IR-tramadol was appropriate to recommend hospital referral (sensitivity, 100% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85–100]; specificity, 73% [95% CI, 64–80]; predictive positive value, 39% [95% CI, 35–57]; negative predictive value, 100% [95% CI, 96–100]). Children who ingested <7.4 mg/kg IR-tramadol developed no (n = 68) or minor (n = 22) neurological symptoms. Conclusions Despite increasing tramadol prescriptions in adults during the study period in France, oral exposure to IR-tramadol in ≤6-year-old children was rare but possibly responsible for severe toxicity. Children with no underlying disease and concomitant medication ingesting <7.4 mg/kg IR-tramadol alone could be observed at home. However, given the observed variability in the onset of seizures after tramadol ingestion, which can occur at ingested tramadol doses below 7.4 mg and even at therapeutic doses, parents or guardians should be specifically warned about the risk of seizures.

Opioid Analgesic Prescription in French Children: A National Population-Based Study.

Codeine use was restricted in 2013 and is currently contraindicated for children below the age of 12 years. We examined how the prescription of opioid analgesics in children in France evolved between 2012 and 2018. Our population-based study from the SNIIRAM database (National System of Health Insurance Inter-Regime Information) was designed to determine trends in opioid prescription from 2012 to 2018 in all French children. The number of children who received at least one opioid prescription gradually declined from 452,665 in 2012 (347.5 children per 10,000) to 169,338 in 2018 (130.3 children per 10,000). This decrease was especially marked for codeine (36 children per 10,000 in 2018 vs. 308.5 children per 10,000 in 2012), whereas the number of tramadol prescriptions increased by 171% in 2018 (94.6 children per 10,000). Despite the increase, strong opioids still formed only a small proportion of prescriptions (2.6 children per 10,000 given opioids in 2018). Overall opioid prescriptions in French children dramatically decreased between 2012 and 2018, probably owing to restrictions on the use of codeine. Codeine has been partly replaced by tramadol. Morphine is still probably underused. This suggests that opioids are being used less often for pain management in children.

Incidence and risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use following lumbar spine surgery: a cohort study.

Sustained postoperative opioid use after elective surgery is a matter of growing concern. Herein, the authors investigated incidence and predictors of long-term opioid use among patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, especially as a function of opioid prescribing practices at postoperative discharge (dose in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs] and type of opioid). The OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was queried for postdischarge opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression and discectomy (LDD) or posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) for degenerative spine disease. Only patients who received an opioid prescription at postoperative discharge and those who had a minimum of 180 days of insurance coverage prior to surgery and 180 days after surgery were included. Opioid-naive patients were defined as those who had no opioid fills in 180 days prior to surgery. The following patterns of long-term postoperative use were investigated: additional fills (at least one opioid fill 90-180 days after surgery), persistent fills (any span of opioid use starting in the 180 days after surgery and lasting at least 90 days), and Consortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends (CONSORT) criteria for persistent use (episodes of opioid prescribing lasting longer than 90 days and 120 or more total days' supply or 10 or more prescriptions in 180 days after the index fill). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of long-term use. A total of 25,587 patients were included, of whom 52.7% underwent PLF (n = 13,486) and 32.5% (n = 8312) were opioid-naive prior to surgery. The rates of additional fills, persistent fills, and CONSORT use were 47%, 30%, and 23%, respectively, after PLF and 35.4%, 19%, and 14.2%, respectively, after LDD. The rates among opioid-naive patients were 18.9%, 5.6%, and 2.5% respectively, after PLF and 13.3%, 2.0%, and 0.8%, respectively, after LDD. Using multivariable logistic regression, the following were identified to be significantly associated with higher risk of long-term opioid use following PLF: discharge opioid prescription ≥ 500 MMEs, prescription of a long-acting opioid, female sex, multilevel surgery, and comorbidities such as depression and drug abuse (all p < 0.05). Elderly (age ≥ 65 years) and opioid-naive patients were found to be at lower risk (all p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained on analysis for LDD with the following significant additional risk factors identified: discharge opioid prescription ≥ 400 MMEs, prescription of tramadol alone at discharge, and inpatient surgery (all p < 0.05). In an analysis of pharmacy claims from a national insurance database, the authors identified incidence and predictors of long-term opioid use after elective lumbar spine surgery.

Provider specialty and odds of a new codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone and tramadol prescription before and after the CDC opioid prescribing guideline publication

The CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain cautioned against high dose prescribing but did not provide guidance on type of opioid for new pain episodes. We determined if new prescriptions for Schedule II opioids vs. tramadol decreased in the 18 months after vs. before the CDC guideline and if this decrease was associated with physician specialty. New opioid prescriptions, provider type and covariates were measured using a nationally distributed, Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) data base. Eligible patients were free of cancer and HIV and started a new prescription for Schedule II opioids (i.e. codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone) or Schedule IV (tramadol) in the 18 months before (n = 141,219) or 18 months after (n = 138,216) guideline publication. Fully adjusted multilevel multinomial models estimated the association between provider type (anesthesiology/pain medicine, surgical specialty, emergency, hospital, primary care, other specialty and unknown) before and after adjusting for covariates. New oxycodone prescriptions were most common among surgical and anesthesia/pain management, and new tramadol prescriptions were most common in primary care. The greatest decreases in odds of a Schedule II opioid vs. tramadol were observed in emergency care (oxycodone vs. tramadol OR = 0.82; 95%CI:0.76–0.88) and primary care (hydrocodone vs. tramadol OR = 0.85; 95%CI:0.81–0.89). Surgical specialists were least likely to start opioid therapy with tramadol. In the 18 months after vs. before the CDC guideline, emergency care and primary care providers increased tramadol prescribing. Guidelines tailored to specialists that frequently begin opioid therapy with oxycodone may enhance safe opioid prescribing.

Addressing National Opioid Prescribing Practices for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Analysis of an Estimated 41,389,332 Patients With Knee Arthritis.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic pathology that is treated across multiple specialties. Opioid prescribing practices for knee OA have not been described on a national level. The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate the trends in opioid prescriptions for knee OA, (2) characterize and identify predominant opioid based medications prescribed for knee OA, and (3) identify patient- and provider-related factors influencing opioid prescribing patterns in the treatment of knee OA in the outpatient setting. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) was used to identify all patients in the United States who presented to an outpatient clinic for knee OA between 2007 and 2016. New opioid prescriptions were determined using a previously published algorithm. Generalized linear models were used to assess trends. A total of 41,389,332 patients were included, of which 12.8% were prescribed an opioid-based medication. Opioid prescription rose from 2007/2008 to 2013/2014. Analysis of the opioid type demonstrated that the prescription of hydrocodone-based medication and "other" traditional opioids followed the aforementioned trends. However, tramadol prescription demonstrated a sustained increase throughout the years peaking at 2015/2016. Patient income in the lowest quartile, a worker's compensation status, and depression were independently associated with higher odds of opioid prescription for knee OA. Opioid prescription for knee OA remains high. Decreases in traditional opioid prescription have been countered by increase in tramadol prescription. The risks and addictive potential of tramadol and patient and provider risk factors should be emphasized.