Prescription Opioid Analgesics Research Articles

Opioid prescribing patterns for distal radius fractures in the ambulatory setting: A 10-year retrospective study.

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common orthopedic injuries, with most managed in the nonoperative ambulatory setting. The objectives of this study are to examine National Health Center Statistics (NHCS) data for DRF treated in the nonoperative ambulatory setting to identify opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescribing patterns and to determine demographic risk factors for prescription of these medications. Design, setting, patients, and measures: This study is a retrospective analysis of data collected by the NHCS from 2007 to 2016. Utilizing International Classification of Diseases codes, all visits to emergency departments and doctors' offices for DRFs were identified. Variables of interest included demographic data, expected payment source, and prescription of opioid or nonopioid analgesics. During the study timeframe, 15,572,531 total visits for DRFs were recorded. DRF visits requiring opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescriptions increased over time. Patients aged 45-64 years were significantly more likely to receive an opioid prescription than any other age group (p < 0.05). Opioid prescription was positively correlated with the use of workers' compensation and negatively correlated with patients receiving services under charity care (p < 0.05). Prescriptions of both opioid and nonopioid analgesic medications for DRF have been steadily increasing over time in the nonoperative ambulatory setting, with middle-aged adults most likely to receive an opioid prescription. Opioid prescription rates differ significantly between patients utilizing workers' compensation and patients receiving services under charity care, suggesting that socioeconomic factors play a role in prescribing patterns.

Comparative evaluation of two methods of prolonged femoral nerve block using an elastomeric pump after knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: The number of knee arthroplasty (KA) surgeries is increasing annually. These surgeries are associated with severe pain. The optimal method of choice in perioperative analgesia in these patients remains controversial. The use of regional analgesia, including prolonged analgesia, allows for high pain relief and increased patient satisfaction. Modern elastomeric pumps (EP) provide prolonged conduction analgesia, which significantly expands the possibilities of perioperative pain relief.&#x0D; OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of prolonged femoral nerve block using EP with and without bolus after KA.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized study included 75 patients who were divided into two clinical groups: group 1 (n=36), patients who received prolonged regional analgesia using EP with controlled injection without bolus, and group 2 (n=39), patients who received prolonged regional analgesia using EP with bolus. In the postoperative period, the level of pain at rest and during movement was assessed after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours as well as the need for opioid analgesics, consumption of local anesthetic for various options of continued regional analgesia, quadriceps femoris muscle function, and distance traveled by patients after surgery in the first 2 days.&#x0D; RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in pain level at rest and during movement in the observation period between the groups (p=0.213). No additional prescription of opioid analgesics was required. Local anesthetic consumption was lower in group 2 (group 1.384±33.4 ml; group 2.237±25.1 ml; p=0.031). Patients in group 2 had greater activity in knee extension and, thus, greater distance traveled after surgery.&#x0D; CONCLUSION: The use of EP with a bolus has been demonstrated to provide adequate levels of analgesia and better functional recovery in patients with bolus after KA than in patients without bolus. This technique is recommended as a component of enhanced recovery program after surgery.

Cultivating optimal analgesic prescribing practices in a metropolitan hospital network: evaluating an analgesic stewardship program

AbstractBackgroundThe increasing incidence of opioid‐related harm associated with inappropriate opioid prescription underscores the need for effective interventions directed at enhancing analgesic prescribing practices. Analgesic stewardship (AGS) programs have emerged to facilitate appropriate analgesic use, reducing analgesic‐related harm and optimising patient outcomes.AimThis study aimed to assess the impact of an AGS program on the appropriateness of opioid analgesia prescribing for adult inpatients within a metropolitan health network during the initial two months following program implementation.MethodThis retrospective audit examined de‐identified aggregate data of 100 adult inpatients of a major Australian metropolitan hospital network between August–September 2022. The multidisciplinary AGS program involving pharmacy, nursing, and medical staff provided clinical interventions and recommendations for patients, supported by organisational interventions, including education and guideline reinforcement. Data collection included patient demographics, clinical data, and AGS program recommendations documented in patient medical records. Ethical approval was granted by the Eastern Health Office of Research and Ethics (Reference no: QA23‐015‐91886) and the study confirms to the Australian Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.ResultsIt was found that 51% of opioid‐naïve patients were prescribed modified‐release opioids for acute non‐cancer pain, contrary to local guidelines. The AGS program recommendations resulted in an 89.7% cessation of these prescriptions. For non‐opioid‐naïve patients, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose of 19.85 mg (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3–29.4 mg, p &lt; 0.05). AGS recommendations were predominantly adhered to, with 82% showing full or partial compliance.ConclusionThis study highlights the positive impact of an AGS program on the appropriateness of opioid analgesic prescribing for adult inpatients. These findings support the implementation of AGS programs into healthcare systems to mitigate opioid‐related harm and improve patient outcomes.

Preoperative Opioid Use and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

The prescription of opioid analgesics for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is controversial, and their effect on postoperative outcomes for patients with TN undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD) has not been reported. We aimed to describe the relationship between preoperative opioid use and postoperative outcomes in patients with TN undergoing MVD. We reviewed the records of 920 patients with TN at our institution who underwent an MVD between 2007 and 2020. Patients were sorted into 2 groups based on preoperative opioid usage. Demographic information, comorbidities, characteristics of TN, preoperative medications, pain and numbness outcomes, and recurrence data were recorded and compared between groups. Multivariate ordinal regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess differences in pain outcomes between groups. One hundred and forty-five (15.8%) patients in this study used opioids preoperatively. Patients who used opioids preoperatively were younger (P = .04), were more likely to have a smoking history (P < .001), experienced greater pain in modified Barrow Neurological Institute pain score at final follow-up (P = .001), and were more likely to experience pain recurrence (P = .01). In addition, patients who used opioids preoperatively were more likely to also have been prescribed TN medications including muscle relaxants and antidepressants preoperatively (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). On multivariate regression, opioid use was an independent risk factor for greater postoperative pain at final follow-up (P = .006) after controlling for variables including female sex and age. Opioid use was associated with shorter time to pain recurrence on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = .005) and was associated with increased risk for recurrence on Cox proportional hazards regression (P = .008). Preoperative opioid use in the setting of TN is associated with worse pain outcomes and increased risk for pain recurrence after MVD. These results indicate that opioids should be prescribed cautiously for TN and that worse post-MVD outcomes may occur in patients using opioids preoperatively.

Childhood trauma and the use of opioids and other prescription analgesics in adolescence and young adulthood: The HUNT Study.

Opioid and nonopioid analgesics are commonly prescribed to young people to alleviate pain. Even short-term prescriptions increase the risk of persistent use and future misuse of potent analgesics, such as opioids. Childhood trauma exposure has been found to be related to pain conditions and to using more prescription analgesics. This large, prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association of a broad range of childhood trauma exposures with prescription rates for opioid and nonopioid analgesics in adolescence and young adulthood. Self-reported data on childhood trauma exposures from adolescents (aged 13-19 years) who participated in the Young-HUNT3 Study (2006-2008, n = 8199) were linked to data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD, 2004-2021). We found that exposure to childhood trauma was consistently associated with higher prescription rates for opioids throughout adolescence and young adulthood. The highest incidence rate ratio (IRR) in adolescence was observed for sexual abuse (IRR 1.63, confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.23). In young adulthood, the highest IRR was observed for physical violence (2.66, CI 2.27-3.12). The same overall pattern was observed for nonopioid analgesics. The more frequent prescriptions of opioid and nonopioid analgesics to participants exposed to childhood trauma suggests a higher symptom load of pain causing them to seek professional help with pain relief. Receiving potent analgesics is not without risk, and the likelihood of misuse may be elevated among trauma-exposed individuals. A trauma-informed approach to pain could be vital for guiding clinicians to the most effective and least harmful treatment for each patient.

Prescription of Opioid Analgesics for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in Germany despite Contraindications: Administrative Claims Data Analysis.

In Germany, long-term opioid treatment (L-TOT) for chronic non-tumor pain (CNTP) is discussed as not being performed according to the German guideline on L-TOT for CNTP. In the present analysis, the occurrence and predictors of inappropriate care/overuse in a cohort of German insureds with L-TOT for CNTP by the presence of a contraindication with concurrent opioid analgesic (OA) therapy were investigated. We also analyzed whether prescribing physicians themselves diagnosed a contraindication. The retrospective cohort study was based on administrative claims data from a German statutory health insurance. Eight contraindication groups were defined based on the German guideline. Logistic regressions were performed in order to identify predictors for OA prescriptions despite contraindications. The possible knowledge of the prescribing physician about the contraindication was approximated by analyzing concordant unique physician identification numbers of OA prescriptions and contraindication diagnoses. A total of 113,476 individuals (75% female) with a mean age of 72 years were included. The most common documented contraindications were primary headaches (8.7%), severe mood disorders (7.7%) and pain in somatoform disorders (4.5%). The logistic regressions identified a younger age, longer history of OA therapy, opioid related psychological problems, and outpatient psychosomatic primary care as positive predictors for all contraindication groups.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Prescribing of Pain Medication in US Primary Care Settings, 1999-2019: Where Are We Now?

Policy initiatives have attempted to reduce healthcare inequalities in the USA, but evidence on whether these initiatives have reduced racial and ethnic disparities in pain treatment in primary care is lacking. To determine whether racial and ethnic disparities in medication prescribed for pain in primary care settings have diminished over a 21-year period from 1999 to 2019. An annual, representative cross-sectional probability sample of visits to US primary care physicians, taken from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Pain-related visits to primary care physicians. Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics. Of 599,293 (16%) sampled visits, 94,422 were pain-related, representing a population-weighted estimate of 143 million visits made annually to primary care physicians for pain. Relative risk analysis controlling for insurance, pain type, and other potential confounds showed no difference in pain medication prescribed between Black and White patients (p = .121). However, White patients were 1.61 (95% CI 1.32-1.97) and Black patients 1.57 (95% CI 1.26-1.95) times more likely to be prescribed opioids than a more underrepresented group consisting of Asian, Native-Hawaiian/Pacific-Islander, and American-Indian/Alaska-Natives (ps < .001). Non-Hispanic/Latino patients were 1.32 (95% CI 1.18-1.45) times more likely to receive opioids for pain than Hispanic/Latino patients (p < .001). Penalized cubic spline regression found no substantive narrowing of disparities over time. These findings suggest that additional intervention strategies, or better implementation of existing strategies, are needed to eliminate ethnic and racial disparities in pain treatment towards the goal of equitable healthcare.

Patterns of filled prescriptions and the association with risk of drug-induced death. A population-based nested case-control register study.

Opioid analgesics (OA) and other pharmaceuticals have been associated with drug-induced deaths. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding patterns of use of these pharmaceuticals in the population and regarding such associations. We identify and describe subgroups of people with different patterns of filled prescriptions of OA and other relevant pharmaceuticals and examine associations with drug-induced deaths. In addition, we estimate the proportion of drug-induced deaths with a filled OA prescription and OA as cause of death. A Norwegian population-based nested case-control register study with cases (drug-induced deaths 2010-2018, N = 2388) and population controls matched for age, gender and year of inclusion (N = 21 465). Patterns of filled prescriptions for opioid analgesics (OA), benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs, gabapentinoids, ADHD medication and antidepressants/antipsychotics were explored by k-means cluster analysis. Associations with drug-induced deaths were estimated by conditional logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Overlap of filled OA prescriptions and OA as cause of death was estimated. Five clusters were identified: 'few prescriptions', 'weak OA', 'ADHD medication', 'sedative/psychiatric morbidity' and 'strong OA'. The 'strong OA' cluster had higher socioeconomic status compared to the other groupings. The risk of drug-induced death was also highest in this cluster (OR = 35.5; CI 25.6-49.3) and, for 68% (CI 64-73) of cases, filled prescriptions for OA was indicated as the underlying cause of death. The cluster analysis identified a subgroup with filled prescriptions of OA and other pharmaceuticals and a higher socioeconomic status than other subgroups. This subgroup had a high risk of drug-induced death that needs to be addressed.

A study on the 10-year trend of surgeries performed for lumbar disc herniation and comparative analysis of prescribed opioid analgesics and hospitalization duration: 2010–2019 HIRA NPS Data

BackgroundThis study, utilizing the claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea, aimed to examine the 10-year (2010–2019) trends in various types of lumbar spine surgeries performed on patients diagnosed with lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD), and the current status of opioid prescriptions, as well as the duration of postoperative hospital stays based on the type of surgery performed.MethodThis retrospective cross-sectional study examined patients with one or more national health insurance claims carrying a primary or secondary diagnosis of HIVD (ICD-10 codes: M511, M518, M519) over a 10-year period (2010–2019). From the patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, we selected those who did not require reoperation within 30 days following the initial lumbar surgery. Our final study sample comprised patients who underwent only one type of surgery.ResultsAmong the patients diagnosed with HIVD and subsequently undergoing lumbar surgery between 2010 and 2019, a slight downward trend was observed in those undergoing open discectomy (OD); however, OD persistently accounted for the highest proportion over the 10 years. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) demonstrated a consistent upward trend from 2016 to 2018. When inspecting trends, we noted a consistent escalation over the decade in the postoperative opioid prescription rates of strong opioids (50.7% in 2010 to 77.8% in 2019) and tramadol (50.9% in 2010 to 76.8% in 2019). Analyzing these trends by surgery type, spinal fusion exhibited a slightly higher rate of opioid prescriptions than other lumbar surgeries. Regarding the length of postoperative hospital stays, patients undergoing PELD recorded the shortest stay (7.04 ± 6.78 days), while spinal fusion necessitated the longest (20.14 ± 12.18 days).ConclusionThis study analyzed the trends in types of lumbar spine surgeries, opioid analgesic prescriptions, and length of hospital stays over 10 years (2010–2019) among patients with HIVD in Korea. Our data and findings provide valuable evidence that may prove beneficial for clinicians and researchers involved in HIVD-related practices.

Opioid analgesics prescribing trends 2010-2019 in Slovenia: National database study.

Significant increases in global opioid use have been reported in recent decades. This study analyzed opioid utilization in outpatient care in Slovenia between 2010 and 2019. This retrospective cross-sectional study performed a nationwide database analysis of all outpatient opioid analgesic prescriptions based on Slovenian health insurance claims data. Prevalence was defined as the number of recipients prescribed at least one opioid per 1000 inhabitants. Opioid consumption was presented as the total number of dispensed prescriptions per 1000 inhabitants and dispensed defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants for each year analyzed. The age-standardized prevalence of opioid recipients decreased by 21.5% during the study period. Total opioid consumption decreased both in the number of prescriptions (-9.2%) and DDD (-5.4%). Tramadol consumption decreased in terms of the number of prescriptions (-12.2%) and DDD (-2.7%), whereas prescriptions for strong opioids increased (10.2%) and DDDs decreased (-16.2%). The results suggest less intensive prescribing of strong opioids and more intensive prescribing for tramadol. The most frequently used strong opioids were fentanyl and oxycodone/naloxone. The prevalence of opioid recipients and opioid consumption is decreasing in Slovenia. Further research is needed to understand whether this finding reflects safe use or underuse of these important analgesics.

Evidence-Based Opioid Education That Reduces Prescribing: The 10 Principles of Opioid Prescribing in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Over half of opioid misusers last obtained access to opioids via a friend or relative, a problematic reflection of the opioid reservoir phenomenon, which results from an unused backlog of excess prescription opioids that are typically stored in the American home. We aim to determine if a voluntary educational intervention containing standard opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescribing ranges for common surgeries is effective in altering postoperative prescribing practice. We utilized a mixed methods approach and sent out a questionnaire to American podiatric physicians, including residents (baseline group A), via email in early 2020 for baseline data; then, we interviewed foot and ankle surgeons and the primary themes of these semistructured interviews informed us to target residents for an educational intervention. We repeated the survey 3 years later in summer 2022 (preintervention group B). We created an opioid guide and emailed it to residents in fall 2022. Another repeat survey was done in spring 2023 (postintervention group C). We used the Mann-Whitney U test to examine differences between the groups among their reported postoperative opioid quantities for a first metatarsal osteotomy surgical scenario. Groups A, B, and C had 60, 100, and 99 residents, respectively. There was no significant difference (p = .9873) between baseline group A and preintervention group B. There was a difference (p < .0001; -5 median) between preintervention group B and postintervention group C (same residency year). In postintervention group C, a majority (91/99) reported viewing the guide at least once, and the number of residents that reported supplementing with NSAIDs also doubled compared to preintervention group B. This novel opioid educational intervention resulted in meaningful change in self-reported postoperative prescribing behavior among residents.

Leveraging a Learning Collaborative Model to Develop and Pilot Quality Measures to Improve Opioid Prescribing in the Emergency Department

The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Emergency Medicine Quality Network (E-QUAL) Opioid Initiative was launched in 2018 to advance the dissemination of evidence-based resources to promote the care of emergency department (ED) patients with opioid use disorder. This virtual platform-based national learning collaborative includes a low-burden, structured quality improvement project, data benchmarking, tailored educational content, and resources designed to support a nationwide network of EDs with limited administrative and research infrastructure. As a part of this collaboration, we convened a group of experts to identify and design a set of measures to improve opioid prescribing practices to provide safe analgesia while reducing opioid-related harms. We present those measures here, alongside initial performance data on those measures from a sample of 370 nationwide community EDs participating in the 2019 E-QUAL collaborative. Measures include proportion of opioid administration in the ED, proportion of alternatives to opioids as first-line treatment, proportion of opioid prescription, opioid pill count per prescription, and patient medication safety education among ED visits for atraumatic back pain, dental pain, or headache. The proportion of benzodiazepine and opioid coprescribing for ED visits for atraumatic back pain was also evaluated. This project developed and effectively implemented a collection of 6 potential measures to evaluate opioid analgesic prescribing across a national sample of community EDs, representing the first feasibility assessment of opioid prescribing-related measures from rural and community EDs.

Evaluation of audit and feedback to family physicians on prescribing of opioid analgesics to opioid-naïve patients: A pragmatic randomized delay trial

BackgroundExposure to opioid analgesics have historically raised concern for a risk of developing opioid use disorder. Prescriber audit-and-feedback interventions may reduce opioid prescribing, but some studies have shown detrimental effects for current users. We examined the effectiveness of an audit and feedback intervention, named Portrait, to reduce initiation of opioid analgesics among opioid-naïve patients experiencing pain. MethodsREDONNA was a single-blinded, two-arm (Early vs Delayed mailing) randomized trial of a portrait for eligible family physicians (FPs) in British Columbia (BC), Canada. The primary outcome was the change in the number of initiations of opioid analgesic prescriptions written by FPs for acute/chronic pain management. We compared outcomes for a 6-month window before vs. after each mailed intervention, using differences in percent differences (DPD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and odds ratios (OR) from logistic regressions adjusted for clustering of patients by FP. ResultsIn the Early (n = 2260) and Delayed (n = 2156) groups, opioid initiations per month were the same in the Before (2.10 Early; 2.06 Delayed) and After (1.94 Early; 1.95 Delayed) windows. The DPD was −2.1% (CI: −4.4% to 0.3%), and ORs were: 0.98 (CI: 0.96 to 1.01) for any opioid, 0.97 (CI: 0.94 to 1.01) for codeine (62% of initiations), and 1.0 (CI: 0.97 to 1.07) for tramadol (25% of initiations). There were no differences in mean quantity of tablets, mean milligrams of morphine equivalents (MME), or mean number of days. ConclusionPortrait had no impact on FPs' rates of prescribing opioid analgesics to opioid-naïve patients experiencing pain. Trial registrationThe study was registered prospectively on 30 March 2020 at the ISRCTN Register (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN34246811).

Trends in repeat opioid analgesic prescription utilization for acute pain in children: 2013-2018.

Our study examined the change in repeat opioid analgesic prescription trends in children and adolescents experiencing acute pain between 2013 to 2018. Eligible individuals were children and adolescents between 1 - 17 years of age enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care plan and filled an incident opioid analgesic prescription from 2013 to 2018. A repeat opioid prescription was defined as receiving a subsequent opioid prescription within 30 days from the end of the incident opioid prescription. A generalized linear regression analysis was conducted to examine changes in repeat opioid analgesic dispensing over time at quarterly intervals from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The cohort comprised 17,086 children and adolescents receiving an incident opioid analgesic. Of these, 1,780 (10.4%) filled a repeat opioid analgesic prescription. There was a significant decline in the repeat opioid analgesic trend from 11.5% in Q1 2013 to 9.6% in Q4 2018. Stratified analyses by age, sex, and race/ethnicity in a sub-cohort of patients undergoing surgical procedures showed that Non-Hispanic Whites had significantly higher repeat opioid utilization than non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics in all subgroups by age and sex. Over time, the most significant absolute utilization decline was observed in non-Hispanic White children and Hispanic adolescents, which has reduced racial/ethnic variations in children and persisted differences among adolescents. Approximately 10% of incident pediatric opioid analgesic recipients received a repeat opioid prescription. There has been a moderate but steady decline (~7% per quarter) in repeat opioid analgesic utilization between 2013 to 2018.

Allele frequency and genotype distribution of the opioid receptor μ-1 (OPRM1) A118G polymorphism in the Western Saudi population.

The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G (rs1799971) in the Mu Opioid Receptor 1 (OPRM1) gene is associated with significant variations in analgesic doses and adverse effects of opioids. The A118G OPRM1 allele distributions vary significantly between different populations worldwide. The study aimed to assess the allele frequency and genotype distribution of OPRM1 A118G SNP in Saudis. This cross-sectional study included 124 healthy Saudis (62 males and 62 females) visiting the King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The Oragene®-DISCOVER (OGR-600) kits were used to collect saliva samples from the participants. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism was utilized to assess the SNP. Among the tested population, 79.03% (95% C.I. 70.81-85.82) were homozygous wild-type A118A, 16.13% (95% C.I. 10.14-23.80) were heterozygous A118G, and 4.84% (95% C.I. 1.80-10.23) were homozygous mutant G118G. OPRM1 A118G polymorphism allele frequencies were 87% (95% C.I. 79.89-92.44) and 13% (95% C.I. 7.56-20.11) for the 118A and 118G alleles, respectively. A higher frequency of the OPRM1 118G allele was present in females, 21% (95% C.I. 11.66-33.17) compared to males, 5% (95% C.I. 1.01-13.50). Relative to other Asian countries, the Saudi population showed a low prevalence of the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism, with a higher frequency of the 118G allele in females. Our research will contribute to the existing knowledge on the prevalence of OPRM1 A118G polymorphism, which could be considered for the personalized prescribing of opioid analgesics.

Trends in Racial Inequalities in the Administration of Opioid and Non-opioid Pain Medication in US Emergency Departments Across 1999-2020.

Despite initiatives to eradicate racial inequalities in pain treatment, there is no clear picture on whether this has translated to changes in clinical practice. To determine whether racial disparities in the receipt of pain medication in the emergency department have diminished over a 22-year period from 1999 to 2020. We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual, cross-sectional probability sample of visits to emergency departments of non-federal general and short-stay hospitals in the USA. Pain-related visits to the ED by Black or White patients. Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics. A total of 203,854 of all sampled 625,433 ED visits (35%) by Black or White patients were pain-related, translating to a population-weighted estimate of over 42 million actual visits to US emergency departments for pain annually across 1999-2020. Relative risk regression found visits by White patients were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.22-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in an opioid prescription for pain compared to Black patients (40% vs. 32%). Visits by Black patients were also 1.25 (95% CI, 1.21-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in non-opioid analgesics only being prescribed. Results were not substantively altered after adjusting for insurance status, type and severity of pain, geographical region, and other potential confounders. Spline regression found no evidence of meaningful change in the magnitude of racial disparities in prescribed pain medication over 22 years. Initiatives to create equitable healthcare do not appear to have resulted in meaningful alleviation of racial disparities in pain treatment in the emergency department.

Features of opioid analgesia s in patients with phantom limb pain after amputation due to gunshot wounds

Background. Since the beginning of the large-scale war on the territory of Ukraine, the incidence of limb injuries has reached 40 %: 15 % of them are upper limb injuries, 25 % are lower limb injuries, and the proportion of patients who have lost limbs due to trauma has increased significantly. In these patients, phantom pain occurs in more than 60 % of cases. Such pain is extremely difficult to treat with standard approaches. Usually, the prescription of opioid analgesics is required, but there is no data on their effectiveness in the comprehensive therapy of phantom pain, which appears as a result of limb amputation and is one of the most difficult clinical problems today. Materials and methods. Our study involved 57 patients. The diagnosis of phantom pain was made based on the clinical picture and patient description. The severity of pain was studied using the visual analog scale. To determine the neuropathic component of pain, Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions were used. The distribution of quantitative indicators for normality was checked with the Shapiro-Wilk test and Student’s test. Results. According to the visual analog scale data, no significant statistical difference was found between group 1 and 2 (p &gt; 0.05). The data of Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions indicate that group 1 has statistically better results than group 2 (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions. The results of pain relief in patients with phantom limb pain after amputation due to gunshot wounds in comprehensive therapy shows a better result than tramadol.

Duration and Timing of In Utero Opioid Exposure and Incidence of Neonatal Withdrawal Syndrome.

To evaluate the association between prenatal prescription opioid analgesic exposure (duration, timing) and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Wisconsin Medicaid-covered singleton live births from 2011 to 2019. The primary outcome was a NOWS diagnosis in the first 30 days of life. Opioid exposure was identified with any claim for prescription opioid analgesic fills during pregnancy. We measured exposure duration cumulatively in days (1-6, 7-29, 30-89, and 90 or more) and identified timing as early (first two trimesters only) or late (third trimester, regardless of earlier pregnancy use). We used logistic regression modeling to assess NOWS incidence by exposure duration and timing, with and without propensity score matching. Overall, 31,456 (14.3%) of 220,570 neonates were exposed to prescription opioid analgesics prenatally. Among exposed neonates, 19,880 (63.2%) had 1-6 days of exposure, 7,694 (24.5%) had 7-29 days, 2,188 (7.0%) had 30-89 days, and 1,694 (5.4%) had 90 or more days of exposure; 15,032 (47.8%) had late exposure. Absolute NOWS incidence among neonates with 1-6 days of exposure was 7.29 per 1,000 neonates (95% CI 6.11-8.48), and incidence increased with longer exposure: 7-29 days (19.63, 95% CI 16.53-22.73); 30-89 days (58.96, 95% CI 49.08-68.84); and 90 or more days (177.10, 95% CI 158.90-195.29). Absolute NOWS incidence for early and late exposures were 11.26 per 1,000 neonates (95% CI 9.65-12.88) and 35.92 per 1,000 neonates (95% CI 32.95-38.90), respectively. When adjusting for confounders including timing of exposure, neonates exposed for 1-6 days had no increased odds of NOWS compared with unexposed neonates, whereas those exposed for 30 or more days had increased odds of NOWS (30-89 days: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.15, 95% CI 1.22-3.79; 90 or more days: 2.80, 95% CI 1.36-5.76). Late exposure was associated with elevated odds of NOWS (aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.25-1.96) when compared with unexposed after adjustment for exposure duration. More than 30 days of prenatal prescription opioid exposure was associated with NOWS regardless of exposure timing. Third-trimester opioid exposure, irrespective of exposure duration, was associated with NOWS.

Urine drug testing in the context of opioid analgesic prescribing for chronic pain: a content analysis of U.S. state laws in 2022.

In response to the opioid crisis, U.S. states have passed laws requiring urine drug testing (UDT) when opioid analgesics are prescribed for chronic pain. We sought to identify state law UDT requirements. We searched NexisUni legal database using terms related to UDT, chronic pain, and opioids. We included laws effective during spring 2022 that required UDT when opioids were prescribed for chronic pain. We performed deductive content analysis, coding laws for mandated UDT frequency, type of clinician and type of payer to whom the law applied, and circumstances under which UDT was mandated. We found 32 laws across 13 states that met our inclusion criteria. UDT requirements varied substantially by state, including with regard to the type of clinician to whom the law applied, the mandated frequency of UDT (eg, at initiation/assessment, at least annually, more than once per year), and the circumstances in which UDT was mandated (eg, patient had substance use disorder; dosage/day threshold). Relatively few states have UDT mandates associated with prescribing opioids as chronic pain treatment. When developing policy indicators for empirical studies, researchers evaluating how UDT policy affects health outcomes must consider the complexity and lack of uniformity of UDT requirements. In addition, even if states mandate UDT, it is unclear whether clinicians understand the best way to use the test results.

An Automatically Adaptive Digital Health Intervention to Decrease Opioid-Related Risk While Conserving Counselor Time: Quantitative Analysis of Treatment Decisions Based on Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Reported Risk Measures.

Some patients prescribed opioid analgesic (OA) medications for pain experience serious side effects, including dependence, sedation, and overdose. As most patients are at low risk for OA-related harms, risk reduction interventions requiring multiple counseling sessions are impractical on a large scale. This study evaluates whether an intervention based on reinforcement learning (RL), a field of artificial intelligence, learned through experience to personalize interactions with patients with pain discharged from the emergency department (ED) and decreased self-reported OA misuse behaviors while conserving counselors' time. We used data representing 2439 weekly interactions between a digital health intervention ("Prescription Opioid Wellness and Engagement Research in the ED" [PowerED]) and 228 patients with pain discharged from 2 EDs who reported recent opioid misuse. During each patient's 12 weeks of intervention, PowerED used RL to select from 3 treatment options: a brief motivational message delivered via an interactive voice response (IVR) call, a longer motivational IVR call, or a live call from a counselor. The algorithm selected session types for each patient each week, with the goal of minimizing OA risk, defined in terms of a dynamic score reflecting patient reports during IVR monitoring calls. When a live counseling call was predicted to have a similar impact on future risk as an IVR message, the algorithm favored IVR to conserve counselor time. We used logit models to estimate changes in the relative frequency of each session type as PowerED gained experience. Poisson regression was used to examine the changes in self-reported OA risk scores over calendar time, controlling for the ordinal session number (1st to 12th). Participants on average were 40 (SD 12.7) years of age; 66.7% (152/228) were women and 51.3% (117/228) were unemployed. Most participants (175/228, 76.8%) reported chronic pain, and 46.2% (104/225) had moderate to severe depressive symptoms. As PowerED gained experience through interactions over a period of 142 weeks, it delivered fewer live counseling sessions than brief IVR sessions (P=.006) and extended IVR sessions (P<.001). Live counseling sessions were selected 33.5% of the time in the first 5 weeks of interactions (95% CI 27.4%-39.7%) but only for 16.4% of sessions (95% CI 12.7%-20%) after 125 weeks. Controlling for each patient's changes during the course of treatment, this adaptation of treatment-type allocation led to progressively greater improvements in self-reported OA risk scores (P<.001) over calendar time, as measured by the number of weeks since enrollment began. Improvement in risk behaviors over time was especially pronounced among patients with the highest risk at baseline (P=.02). The RL-supported program learned which treatment modalities worked best to improve self-reported OA risk behaviors while conserving counselors' time. RL-supported interventions represent a scalable solution for patients with pain receiving OA prescriptions. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02990377; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02990377.