Prescription Of Corticosteroids Research Articles

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Confer No Increased Rates of IBD Exacerbation Among Patients With IBD.

In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), multimorbidity with obesity and type 2 diabetes is common and increasing. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are increasingly being prescribed for patients with IBD, yet their impact on patients with IBD is largely unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on the course of IBD. We identified all IBD patients prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists at a large academic healthcare network between 2009 and 2023. We analyzed demographics and IBD characteristics in the year pre- and post-GLP-1 receptor agonist prescription and matched them to non-IBD controls. Our primary outcome was IBD exacerbation in the year following GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, measured as a composite of IBD-related hospitalization, corticosteroid prescription, medication escalation or changes, or IBD-related surgery. Secondary outcomes included change in metabolic risk factors. Overall, 224 patients met inclusion criteria. At GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, the median age was 54 years, 63% were female, 77% were White, and median BMI was 33.2kg/m2. Compared to the 12-month period prior to GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, in the 12 months post-GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, there was no change in rates of IBD exacerbation, IBD-related hospitalization, steroids prescription, medication escalation or changes, or IBD-related surgery. There was a significant decrease in BMI in the year following GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation (median BMI 33.5 vs 31.6kg/m2, P < .01), with rates of decrease comparable to non-IBD matched controls. In patients with IBD, GLP-1 receptor agonists are effective for weight loss and associated with few episodes of disease exacerbation.

Prevalence of asthma in Catalonia (Spain): a retrospective, large-scale population-based study.

Asthma epidemiology reports an estimated global prevalence of about 4.3-8.6% in adults, with last differences among geographical regions. This study analyses a more significant population of asthma patients (473,737 individuals).To study the prevalence of medical diagnosis of asthma, overall and by age, gender, and disease severity, as well as comorbidities and type 2 biomarkers, and undergo medical treatments of a retrospective population-based asthma cohort from Catalonia (Spain). Individuals with a diagnosis of asthma established by medical records at different healthcare levels (primary, hospital, and emergency) from the Catalan Health System (CHS) were included. Socio-demographic characteristics, prevalence, overall and by age and gender, disease severity, comorbidities, and biomarkers of type-2 inflammation were evaluated, together with appropriate medical treatment. The overall diagnosed asthma prevalence in the population of Catalonia was 6.3%, where patients mainly had mild asthma (5.3%) and were significantly higher in females (6.8%) than males (5.7%). By age groups, asthma was more prevalent in boys and young men adults; however, being more prevalent in females above the age of 30y. The prevalence of severe asthma was 0.4%, 42.6% had uncontrolled asthma, and a high proportion (84.2%) were under systemic corticosteroid prescription. As expected, SABAs were the most prescribed drug (62.6%), followed by systemic corticosteroids (43.3%). More than half (53.8%) of patients showed type 2 inflammation. Asthma prevalence in Catalonia is similar to other areas studied in Spain, with a high prevalence in women and of T2 asthma.

Risk for Facial Palsy after COVID-19 Vaccination, South Korea, 2021-2022.

We conducted a self-controlled case series study to investigate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and facial palsy (FP) in South Korea. We used a large immunization registry linked with the national health information database. We included 44,564,345 patients >18 years of age who received >1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, or Ad.26.COV2.S) and had an FP diagnosis and corticosteroid prescription within 240 days postvaccination. We compared FP incidence in a risk window (days 1-28) with a control window (the remainder of the 240-day observation period, excluding any risk windows). We found 5,211 patients experienced FP within the risk window and 10,531 experienced FP within the control window. FP risk increased within 28 days postvaccination, primarily after first and second doses and was observed for both mRNA and viral vaccines. Clinicians should carefully assess the FP risk-benefit profile associated with the COVID-19 vaccines and monitor neurologic signs after vaccination.

Resolution versus persistence of childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome-A population-based study.

To determine the duration of relapsing childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). In this population-based study, we retrospectively analysed the computerised database of Israel's largest health maintenance organisation. Children (age 2-10 years) with a new INS diagnosis and a corticosteroid (CS) prescription between 2000 and 2010 were included. NS category was determined, according to CS and/or steroid-sparing agents (SSA) purchases. Out of 1 669 977 eligible children, 608 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Patients in the fourth quartile of purchases (n = 132) had an older age at last relapse (17.9 ± 6.3 vs. 11.3 ± 5.9 years, p < 0.001) and more SSA use (78.8% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) compared to the remaining three quartiles. A single episode occurred in 84 patients. Of the remaining 524 patients (males 66%, diagnosis age: 4.8 ± 2.2 years, SSA prescribed: 35%) who were followed for 15.5 ± 5.1 years, 113 (21.6%) had a continuing disease at an age of 19.3 ± 6.3 years. The leftover 411 entered long-lasting treatment-free remission at age 11.2 ± 5.7 years. In this multicentre study, we identified INS disease course by medication delivery. NS long-standing remission occurs at age 11.2 ± 5.7 years in most cases. However, the disease continues into adulthood in a fifth of the relapsing patients, implicating the need for proper transition to adult care.

Association of metformin use with asthma development and adverse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asthma and diabetes are prevalent chronic diseases affecting a significant population globally. Research has suggested that metformin, a commonly used medication for diabetes management, may also have beneficial effects in enhancing asthma outcomes. Considering the comorbidity of asthma and diabetes, a comprehensive analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy of metformin in reducing adverse outcomes of asthma patients with diabetes. To gather relevant data, we conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for observational studies published prior to September 2023. We specifically looked for studies involving individuals diagnosed with both asthma and diabetes, comparing the incidence and severity of asthma exacerbations in metformin users versus nonusers. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies that recruited participants aged 18 years and older. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of newly developing asthma, while secondary outcomes included the adjusted risk of asthma-induced exacerbations, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations. All data analyses and visualizations were performed using the R programming language. We identified and included 7 studies involving a total of 1,176,398 patients in our analysis. The pooled effect size indicated a potential reduction in the incidence of newly developed asthma among patients with type 2 diabetes who used metformin, although this finding did not reach statistical significance. Similar conclusions have also been observed in other outcomes, such as exacerbation, asthma-related emergency department visits, risk of systemic corticosteroid prescription. The only positive outcome is that the use of metformin can reduce the chance of patients being hospitalized due to asthma. In most outcome indicators, it cannot be assumed that the use of metformin can reduce asthma-related adverse events. However, the conclusion is not so certain, and longer observation and more evidence are still required. Metformin still shows some potential in the intervention of respiratory diseases.

Patterns of Corticosteroid Prescriptions among Patients at Community Pharmacies in Lahore, Pakistan

Background: Corticosteroids are a class of steroid hormones produced by the adrenal gland and are used to treat many diseases, including autoimmune diseases and inflammatory diseases. Besides their role in many diseases, long-term use, misuse, and overuse cause side effects including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and osteoporosis. Objective: The aim of current study is to evaluate the prescription pattern of corticosteroids in different community pharmacies, among patients, in Lahore. Methods: The cross-sectional stratified convenient study performed using a validated questionnaire to analyse the prescription pattern of corticosteroids in patients at different community pharmacies in Lahore. Total 92 patients are participating in this study. Results: A total of 92 patients take part in the study. In this research 67.4% females are participated. The average age of patients is above 30 years. Asthma is the most common reason for corticosteroids administration (19.6%) followed by rheumatoid arthritis (12.0%) whereas in inflammatory bowel disease they are least prescribed (1.1%). Prednisolone is the most prescribed drug (33.7%) and Oral route is the frequently given route. Conclusion: Our data shows that the prescription pattern of corticosteroid must be improved. Health care providers should pay attention to counseling of patients and guide them about dose tapering to avoid adverse effects.

Clinical Predictors of Mood Disorders and Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Background/Objectives: We aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical correlations of mood disorders in a sample of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Hence, we hypothesized that the prevalence of mood disorders would be lower than reported in the literature and that patients would remain clinically stable and show less damage accrual despite low-dose corticosteroid prescription. Methods: In total, 92 SLE outpatients gave informed consent to participate in this cross-sectional study. Psychiatric and autoimmune clinical data were obtained, and a structured psychiatric interview was performed. The main clinical scales for the assessment of clinical symptomatology were included. To examine the potential relationships of presenting a mood disorder in SLE, clinical correlations and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Mood disorders were the most prevalent disorder reported by SLE patients (16%), followed by adjustment disorders (5%). A significant proportion of patients presented psychosocial disturbances that did not meet the ICD-10 criteria for psychiatric diagnosis. According to the cut-off criterion for the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), up to 27% of the sample met the clinical criteria for depression. The multivariate analysis revealed a relationship between the presence of a mood disorder with total scores of the MADRS and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Conclusions: The prevalence of mood disorders in patients with SLE was lower than previously reported. Although self-report clinical scales are useful for assessing clinical symptomatology, they should not be used in place of a comprehensive standardized interview conducted by a trained mental health specialist. Multidisciplinary teamwork is required for the early identification and therapeutic management of autoimmune patients with neuropsychiatric disorders.

Corticosteroid Prescribing Patterns in the Emergency Department for Acute COPD Exacerbations: A Retrospective Analysis Following an Educational Intervention.

COPD is a progressive lung disease with marked airflow limitation. It has a large global prevalence and is managed with antibiotics, bronchodilators, and corticosteroids. Despite the prevalence, corticosteroid prescribing regimens differ widely amongst providers. This study aims to evaluate baseline corticosteroid prescribing patterns, the ability to change corticosteroid prescribing patterns with the utilization of an educational initiative, and to evaluate the effect of corticosteroid dose on length of stay, 30-day hospital readmission, mortality, and total hospital insulin dosing. This study was conducted via a retrospective observational study. Providers at a single institution answered a baseline questionnaire on COPD corticosteroid prescribing patterns and subsequently received an educational presentation regarding evidence-based corticosteroid recommendations. Data were then retrospectively obtained and analyzed evaluating corticosteroid prescribing patterns both pre- and post-educational intervention. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Version 25. The provider survey revealed that most (95.3%) administered 125 mg of methylprednisolone to patients treated for AECOPD. The most common reason a particular dose of corticosteroid was administered was due to previous teaching or practice patterns. The mean initial steroid dose of methylprednisolone decreased following the educational initiative from 114.24 mg to 72.8 mg (p < 0.01). This corresponded to a 69% (n=41) decrease of providers using 125 mg methylprednisolone (p < 0.01), and increased prescribing of 62.5 mg methylprednisolone by 42.6% (n=66). The mean LOS following hospital admission for AECOPD in the pre-intervention group was 5.80 days, while the mean LOS following the targeted educational intervention decreased to 4.82 days (p = 0.01). The implementation of an educational intervention may change provider corticosteroid prescribing patterns. Additionally, lower corticosteroid dose in the Emergency Department may decrease patient length of stay. Keywords: Corticosteroid, COPD, LOS, recommendations, steroid.

Factors That Influence Clinician Prescribing of Corticosteroids for Acute Idiopathic and Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Optic Neuritis: A Qualitative Study.

Treatment with corticosteroids is common for patients with idiopathic and multiple sclerosis-associated optic neuritis (I/MS-ON). Yet, the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial and meta-analyses confirm that few patients benefit and that visual benefit is of questionable clinical significance, short-lived, and comes with potential harms. The purpose of this study was to uncover the breadth of factors that underlie clinicians' treatment decisions and determine how these factors may influence corticosteroid use for I/MS-ON. We performed semistructured, one-on-one, qualitative interviews with neurologists, neuro-ophthalmologists, and emergency department clinicians at 15 academic and private practices across the United States. The interview guide used the Theoretical Domain Framework and a vignette to explore numerous factors that might influence decision making for definite I/MS-ON. We analyzed transcripts using inductive thematic analysis to generate themes. A total of 22 clinicians were interviewed before thematic saturation was reached: 8 neuro-ophthalmologists, 8 neurologists, and 6 emergency medicine (EM) clinicians (2 physician assistants, 4 physicians). All neuro-ophthalmologists and nearly all neurologists (7 of 8) were aware of risks/benefits of corticosteroid treatment for I/MS-ON. However, neuro-ophthalmologists varied in their corticosteroid treatment recommendation (n = 3 recommended treatment, n = 2 recommended observation, n = 3 recommended shared decision making), whereas all neurologists recommended corticosteroids, indicating that knowledge of corticosteroid risk/benefit alone does not drive decision making. EM clinicians were not aware of risk/benefits of corticosteroid treatment for I/MS-ON and relied on the treatment recommendations of neurologists. Clinicians recommending corticosteroids held personal beliefs that corticosteroids benefit those with worse vision loss, relieve pain, allow earlier return to work, or have easily mitigated side effects. They also perceived that prescribing steroid was the principal method of "doing something," which fit a key provider role. Clinicians who did not recommend corticosteroids or were neutral perceived the risks as nontrivial, considered discussing treatment trade-offs as "doing something" and incorporated patient preferences. Knowledge of risk/benefits of corticosteroids are necessary but not sufficient for evidence-based I/MS-ON practice. Variation in how clinicians treat patients with acute I/MS-ON is influenced largely by psychosocial factors, such as beliefs about corticosteroid risk/benefit trade-offs and the role of the clinician to provide treatment. Interventions to support evidence-based decision making for I/MS-ON treatment will need to provide risk/benefit information to support clinicians with varying levels of expertise, incorporate patient preference, and normalize the option to observe.

Comparative effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab on asthma exacerbations and systemic corticosteroid prescriptions: Real-world US ADVANTAGE study

In the United States, dupilumab is approved for moderate-to-severe eosinophilic or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, and omalizumab is approved for managing moderate-to-severe allergic asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids. However, limited comparative effectiveness data exist for these biologics due to differing patient characteristics and treatment histories. This study assessed the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab and omalizumab for asthma in patients in the United States. In this retrospective observational study, TriNetX Dataworks electronic medical record data were used to identify patients with asthma age ≥12 years who initiated (index) dupilumab or omalizumab between November 2018 and September 2020 and who had at least 12 months of pre- and post-index clinical information. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance potential confounding in treatment groups. Asthma exacerbation rates and systemic corticosteroid (SCS) prescriptions were compared using a doubly robust negative binomial regression model, adjusting for baseline exacerbation/SCS rates and patient characteristics with ≥10% standardized differences after inverse probability of treatment weighting. All inclusion and exclusion criteria were met by 2138 dupilumab patients and 1313 omalizumab patients. After weighting, the majority of baseline characteristics were balanced (standard difference <10%) between the 2 groups. Dupilumab was associated with a 44% lower asthma exacerbation rate (P< .0001) versus omalizumab. Additionally, dupilumab treatment significantly (P< .05) reduced SCS prescriptions by 28% during the follow-up period compared with omalizumab treatment. The US ADVANTAGE real-world study demonstrated a significant reduction in severe asthma exacerbations and SCS prescriptions for patients prescribed dupilumab compared with patients prescribed omalizumab during 12 months of follow-up.

The Efficacy of Paraprobiotic Lozenges (Lactobacillus helveticus MIMLh5) for the Prevention of Acute and Chronic Nose and Throat Infections in Children.

Background and Objectives: Tonsillitis is common in children and is predominantly caused by viruses and, less frequently, by bacteria such as group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus. The treatment primarily involves supportive care; however, the overuse of antibiotics remains a concern due to rising antibiotic resistance. Probiotics, particularly Lactobacillus strains, have been shown to modulate immune responses, offering a potential alternative treatment. Materials and Methods: Our prospective single-arm, open-label study included 98 pediatric patients aged 5-15 years with recurrent throat and tonsil infections, from October 2022 to January 2023. Patients received lozenges containing heat-killed Lactobacillus helveticus MIMLh5. Monthly follow-ups involved a comprehensive ear, nose, and throat examination, throat cultures, and recording the frequency of infections and antibiotic use. Data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: After three months, significant reductions were observed in the occurrences of nose and throat infections (p < 0.001), enlarged submandibular glands (p < 0.001), and positive throat cultures (p < 0.001). Antibiotic and corticosteroid prescriptions also significantly decreased (p < 0.001). Among children aged 5-10 years, significant improvements were noted in throat and tonsil infections (p < 0.001) and positive throat cultures (p = 0.012). Overall, there was a substantial reduction in school days missed (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of paraprobiotic Lactobacillus helveticus MIMLh5 lozenges significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent throat and tonsil infections in children, decreased the need for antibiotics and corticosteroids, and improved overall clinical outcomes without adverse effects. These findings support the use of paraprobiotic supplements as a safe and effective preventive measure for pediatric throat and tonsil infections.

Insight into Current Practices of Community Pharmacists in Topical Corticosteroid Prescribing and Counseling: Cross-Sectional Survey Study from Saudi Arabia.

Topical corticosteroids are commonly used to treat several skin conditions, most notably atopic dermatitis. Many studies have found that patients lack knowledge about the safety, potency, and appropriate use of topical corticosteroids. This can be due to ineffective education by pharmacists and other healthcare providers. This study aims to evaluate the appropriateness of dispensing and counseling practices of community pharmacists towards topical corticosteroids in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in Saudi Arabia among 418 community pharmacists from different regions of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire that covered community pharmacists' sociodemographic information, their perceptions of patient knowledge about topical corticosteroid use, and their dispensing and their counseling practices, in addition to their perceived barriers to counseling. The majority of the participating community pharmacists were Saudi (57.4%), female (66.7%), holding a bachelor's degree (63.4%), and full-time workers (91.1%). Most of the time, community pharmacists counseled patients on the frequency of application per day and the duration of treatment (75.8% and 74.8%, respectively). The median counseling practice score was 17, with an IQR of 14-21. The main barrier to counseling was lack of time (33.7%). Only 15% of community pharmacists accurately identified all scenarios that necessitate medical referrals. Dry skin, itchiness, and irritation were the most common side effects reported by community pharmacists for patients to complain about (69.4%). Most pharmacists agreed that misuse is the most likely cause of topical corticosteroid adverse drug events (53.7%), followed by medication overuse, such as patient self-treatment (48%). Community pharmacists counseling practices to their patients about the use of topical corticosteroids require improvement. Continuing education and hands-on training are needed for community pharmacists regarding counseling about topical corticosteroids use.

Exacerbation History and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Pulmonary Embolism in COPD

Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) are increasingly recognized as episodes of heightened risk of cardiovascular events. It is not known whether exacerbation history is differentially associated with future myocardial infarction (MI) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Is the number and severity of AECOPDs associated with increased risk of MI or PE in a real-life cohort of patients with COPD? We identified a cohort of 66,422 patients (≥ 30 years of age) with a primary diagnosis of COPD in the Swedish National Airway Register from January 2014 to June 2022, with complete data on lung function. Patients were classified by moderate (prescription of oral corticosteroids) and severe (hospitalization) exacerbations the year before index date and were followed until December 2022 for hospitalization or death from MI or PE, corresponding to > 265,000 patient-years, with a maximum follow-up time of 9 years. Competing risk regression, according to the Fine-Gray model, was used to calculate subdistribution hazard ratios with 95%CIs. Compared with no AECOPDs in the baseline period, AECOPD number and severity were associated with increased long-term risk of both MI and PE in a gradual fashion, ranging from a subdistribution hazard ratio of 1.10 (95%CI, 0.97-1.24) and 1.33 (95%CI, 1.11-1.60), respectively, for one moderate exacerbation, to 1.82 (95%CI, 1.36-2.44) and 2.62 (95%CI, 1.77-3.89), respectively, for two or more severe exacerbations. In a time-restricted follow-up sensitivity analysis, the associations were stronger during the first year of follow-up and diminished over time. The risk of MI and PE increases with the frequency and severity of AECOPD in this large, real-life cohort of patients with COPD.

Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab versus benralizumab and mepolizumab.

Introduction: In the United States, this real-world study compared the effectiveness of dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in reducing exacerbations and systemic corticosteroid (SCS) prescriptions among patients with asthma. Methods: Patients (≥12 years old) who initiated dupilumab, benralizumab, or mepolizumab (index) between November 2018 and September 2020 were identified by using electronic medical record data. Subjects were included if they had ≥ 12 months of data before and after the index date and two or more severe asthma-related exacerbations before the index date. Differences in baseline characteristics were addressed by using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). Pairwise comparisons between dupilumab and benralizumab, or mepolizumab were conducted by using negative binomial regression, adjusting for baseline rates and unbalance characteristics (≥10% standardized differences) after IPTW. Results: Overall, a total of 1737 subjects met all criteria: 825 dupilumab, 461 benralizumab, and 451 mepolizumab initiators. In the postindex period, dupilumab was associated with a 24% and 28% significant reduction in the risk of severe asthma exacerbations versus benralizumab (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.76 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.67-0.86)] and mepolizumab (IRR 0.72 [95% CI, 0.63-0.82]), respectively. In addition, dupilumab treatment significantly reduced SCS prescriptions by 16% and 25% versus benralizumab and mepolizumab, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study represents one of the largest real-world comparisons of biologics (dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab) for asthma in the United States to date. This analysis shows that the use of dupilumab was associated with a significantly greater reduction in both severe asthma exacerbations and SCS prescriptions compared with benralizumab and mepolizumab.

Long-Term Use of Oral Corticosteroids and Safety Outcomes for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

The use of oral corticosteroids for prolonged periods may be associated with adverse events (AEs). Nevertheless, the risk of AEs with oral corticosteroids, especially among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), has not been comprehensively investigated and lacks evidence on duration of treatment. To assess the association between long-term exposure to oral corticosteroids and AEs among adult patients with AD. This nested case-control study used data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea between January 1, 2012, and October 31, 2021, which included 1 year prior to the cohort entry date of January 1, 2013, for assessing exclusion criteria and baseline characteristics, and 1 year after the study end date of October 31, 2020, to ensure a minimum duration for assessing exposure. Among the population of adults with AD, patients diagnosed with any of 11 AEs were matched with patients who had never received a diagnosis of any of the 11 AEs. Long-term use of oral corticosteroids was defined as cumulative supply of more than 30 days or more than 90 days of oral corticosteroid prescription per year. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression analyses to measure the risk of 11 individual outcomes (osteoporosis, fracture, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, avascular necrosis, cataract, or glaucoma) as the composite outcome, controlling for potential confounders. We further classified the composite outcome to individual outcomes to evaluate the AE-specific risk. Among 1 025 270 patients with AD between 2013 and 2020, 164 809 cases (mean [SD] age, 39.4 [14.8]; 56.9% women) were matched with 328 303 controls (mean [SD] age, 39.3 [14.7]; 56.9% women) for sex, age, cohort entry date, follow-up duration, and severity of AD, where the balance of most baseline characteristics was achieved. A total of 5533 cases (3.4%) and 10 561 controls (3.2%) were exposed to oral corticosteroids for more than 30 days, while 684 cases (0.4%) and 1153 controls (0.4%) were exposed to oral corticosteroids for more than 90 days. Overall, there was no increased risk of AEs with use of oral corticosteroids for more than 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04), whereas the risk was slightly higher with use of oral corticosteroids for more than 90 days (AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23). The small elevation in experiencing an AE was observed with each cumulative or consecutive year of ever long-term use. This case-control study found a slightly increased risk of AEs associated with use of oral corticosteroids for more than 90 days per year, which warrants future research to fully elucidate the observed findings.

SG15 A topical matter: iatrogenic adrenal crisis following excessive prescription corticosteroid use

SG15 A topical matter: iatrogenic adrenal crisis following excessive prescription corticosteroid use

Morbidity profile and pharmaceutical management of adult outpatients between primary and tertiary care levels in Sri Lanka: a dual-centre, comparative study

BackgroundOutpatient care is central to both primary and tertiary levels in a health system. However, evidence is limited on outpatient differences between these levels, especially in South Asia. This study aimed to describe and compare the morbidity profile (presenting morbidities, comorbidities, multimorbidity) and pharmaceutical management (patterns, indicators) of adult outpatients between a primary and tertiary care outpatient department (OPD) in Sri Lanka.MethodsA comparative study was conducted by recruiting 737 adult outpatients visiting a primary care and a tertiary care facility in the Kandy district. A self-administered questionnaire and a data sheet were used to collect outpatient and prescription data. Following standard categorisations, Chi-square tests and Mann‒Whitney U tests were employed for comparisons.ResultsOutpatient cohorts were predominated by females and middle-aged individuals. The median duration of presenting symptoms was higher in tertiary care OPD (10 days, interquartile range: 57) than in primary care (3 days, interquartile range: 12). The most common systemic complaint in primary care OPD was respiratory symptoms (32.4%), whereas it was dermatological symptoms (30.2%) in tertiary care. The self-reported prevalence of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) was 37.9% (95% CI: 33.2–42.8) in tertiary care OPD and 33.2% (95% CI: 28.5–38.3) in primary care; individual disease differences were significant only for diabetes (19.7% vs. 12.8%). The multimorbidity in tertiary care OPD was 19.0% (95% CI: 15.3–23.1), while it was 15.9% (95% CI: 12.4–20.0) in primary care. Medicines per encounter at primary care OPD (3.86, 95% CI: 3.73–3.99) was higher than that at tertiary care (3.47, 95% CI: 3.31–3.63). Medicines per encounter were highest for constitutional and respiratory symptoms in both settings. Overall prescribing of corticosteroids (62.7%), vitamin supplements (45.8%), anti-allergic (55.3%) and anti-asthmatic (31.3%) drugs was higher in the primary care OPD, and the two former drugs did not match the morbidity profile. The proportion of antibiotics prescribed did not differ significantly between OPDs. Subgroup analyses of drug categories by morbidity largely followed these overall differences.ConclusionsThe morbidities between primary and tertiary care OPDs differed in duration and type but not in terms of multimorbidity or most comorbidities. Pharmaceutical management also varied in terms of medicines per encounter and prescribed categories. This evidence supports planning in healthcare and provides directions for future research in primary care.

Prevalence, incidence and treatment patterns of prurigo nodularis in England: a retrospective database analysis.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a pruritic skin disease characterized by multiple intensely itchy skin nodules in symmetrically distributed areas of the extremities. There are limited studies on the epidemiology and treatment pathways of PN, especially moderate-to-severe PN, from England. To assess the epidemiology and treatment pathways of mild and moderate-to-severe PN in England. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a PN-specific diagnosis code allocated any time between 1 April 2007 and 1 March 2019 (patient identification period) were selected. Patients were included if their first PN diagnostic code (index diagnosis date; IDD) was recorded during the identification period, with data available 6 months before and ≥ 12 months after the IDD. Patients were classified as having moderate-to-severe PN (MSPN) or mild PN (MiPN), based on the presence or absence of a prescription record, post-IDD, for either a systemic immunosuppressant or a gabapentinoid. Patients with MSPN and MiPN were matched 1 : 1 according to age, sex and IDD. Prevalence and incidence were calculated for each year from 2007 to 2019. Drugs prescribed post-IDD were analysed. A total of 8933 patients (MSPN, n = 2498; MiPN, n = 6435) were included in the study; 2462 patients with MiPN and 2462 with MSPN were included for the comparative analysis. The presence of atopic dermatitis, asthma and eosinophilic oesophagitis were significantly higher (all P < 0.001) in patients with MSPN compared with those with MiPN. The overall prevalence of cases of PN increased during the study period. The incidence rate also showed a similar trend. The rates of prescription of potent and super-potent topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors, first- and second-generation antihistamines, oral and injectable systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, antidepressants and tacrolimus were significantly higher (all P < 0.001) in patients with MSPN compared with those with MiPN. The epidemiology of PN was consistent with that found in other European studies. Patients with MSPN received a significantly higher number of prescriptions for potent TCS and systemic drugs compared with patients with MiPN.

Effect of Corticosteroid Use on the Occurrence and Progression of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Nationwide Nested Case-Control Study

BackgroundAlthough it is very well known that corticosteroids cause osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), it is unclear as to which patients develop ONFH. Additionally, there are no studies on the association between corticosteroid use and femoral head collapse in ONFH patients. We aimed to investigate the association between corticosteroid use and the risk of ONFH among the general population and what factors affect ONFH occurrence. Additionally, we aimed to demonstrate which factors affect femoral head collapse and total hip arthroplasty (THA) after ONFH occurrence. MethodsA nationwide, nested case-control study was conducted with data from the National Health Insurance Service Physical Health Examination Cohort (2002 to 2019) in the Republic of Korea. We defined ONFH (N = 3,500) using diagnosis and treatment codes. Patients who had ONFH were matched 1:5 to form a control group based on the variables of birth year, sex, and follow-up duration. Additionally, in patients who have ONFH, we looked for risk factors for progression to THA. ResultsCompared with the control group, ONFH patients had a low household income and had more diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and heavy alcohol use (drinking more than 3 to 7 drinks per week). Systemic corticosteroid use (≥1,800 mg) was significantly associated with an increased risk of ONFH incidence. However, lipid profiles, corticosteroid prescription, and cumulative doses of corticosteroid did not affect the progression to THA. ConclusionsThe ONFH risk increased rapidly when cumulative prednisolone use was ≥1,800 mg. However, oral or high-dose intravenous corticosteroid use and cumulative dose did not affect the prognosis of ONFH. Since the occurrence and prognosis of ONFH are complex and multifactorial processes, further study is needed.

P021 Uptake, safety, and effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination in adults with immune mediated inflammatory diseases: a UK wide study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

Abstract Background/Aims The safety and effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccine in people with immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is not known, which may contribute to suboptimal uptake. We investigated UK wide pneumococcal vaccine uptake in adults with IMIDs, the association between pneumococcal vaccination and disease flares, and the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia in this at-risk population. Methods Adults with incident rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) prior to 31st August 2018 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Gold were included. The study was approved by CPRD research data governance (Reference 21_000614). We calculated the proportion of patients vaccinated against pneumococcal pneumonia. To investigate the association between vaccination and IMID flare, we employed a self-controlled case series analysis, adjusted for season. The study period was up-to six-month before and six-month after the date of pneumococcal vaccination. This period was partitioned into induction (14 days pre-vaccination) and exposed periods (up-to 90 days post vaccination) with the remaining time considered unexposed. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% CI were calculated. We conducted a multivariable nested case-control study to assess vaccine effectiveness. Cases were patients hospitalised with pneumonia and were matched to up to ten controls for age and sex. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Results We included 32,277 IMID patients: 14,151 with RA, 13,631 with IBD, 3,804 with SpA and 691 with SLE. Overall uptake of pneumococcal vaccination was 50% (95% CI 49.4% -50.5%). Vaccination uptake was significantly lower in the under 45-year-olds, in patients with IBD and in those without additional indication for vaccination at 29.7%, 38.4%, 42.7% respectively. In the safety study, data for 1001, 854, 424 vaccinated patients with primary care consultations for joint pain, AIRD flare, and IBD flare respectively were included. Vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia was not associated with AIRD flare (IRR (95% CI) 1.07 (0.93-1.22)), primary care consultations for joint pain (IRR (95% CI) 0.95 (0.83-1.10)), and IBD flare (IRR (95% CI) 0.82 (0.64-1.06)) in the 90-days post vaccination. The vaccine effectiveness study included 25,707 patients, either with (n = 2,771) or without (n = 22,936) a hospitalisation record for pneumonia after IMID diagnosis. Patients hospitalised for pneumonia compared with their matched controls, had higher odds of current smoking, deprivation, corticosteroid prescriptions, additional indication for vaccination, primary care consultations, hospital admissions and prescriptions. In the multivariable adjusted model, pneumococcal vaccination was associated with reduced odds of hospitalisation for pneumonia (OR (95% CI) 0.88 (0.78-0.98). Conclusion The uptake of pneumococcal vaccine is low in IMID patients. Pneumococcal vaccination is not associated with IMID flare and is protective against pneumonia. These findings call for promotion of pneumococcal vaccination in IMID by health professionals. Disclosure G. Nakafero: None. M.J. Grainge: None. C.D. Mallen: Grants/research support; NIHR, MRC, Versus Arthritis and BMS. T. Card: None. J.S. Nguyen Van-Tam: Consultancies; CSL Seqirus and Moderna. Royalties; AstraZeneca and Sanofi Pasteur. A. Abhishek: Consultancies; NGM Bio, Limbic and Inflazome.. Royalties; UpToDate, Springer, Cadilla Pharmaceuticals.. Grants/research support; AstraZeneca and Oxford Immunotech..