Prescribing Habits Research Articles

The Effects of COVID-19 on Antifungal Prescribing in the UK—Lessons to Learn

Fungal infections are increasingly prevalent; however, antifungal stewardship attracts little funding or attention. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of guidelines and scientific evidence regarding antifungals is poor, leading to prescribing based on personal experiences and the inherent biases this entails. We carried out a retrospective study of inpatient antifungal usage at two major hospitals. We assessed the longitudinal trends in antifungal usage and the effect of COVID-19 on antifungal prescription, alongside levels of empirical and diagnostically targeted antifungal usage. Our results showed that the longitudinal patterns of total systemic antifungal usage within the trusts were similar to national prescribing trends; however, the composition of antifungals varied considerably, even when looking exclusively at the more homogenous group of COVID-19 patients. We showed a high level of empirical antifungal use in COVID-19 patients, with neither trust adhering to international recommendations and instead appearing to follow prior prescribing habits. This study highlights the significant challenges to optimise antifungal use with prescribing behaviour largely dictated by habit, a lack of adherence to guidelines, and high rates of empirical non-diagnostic-based prescribing. Further research and resources are required to understand the impact of antifungal stewardship on improving antifungal prescribing behaviours in this setting and the effects on outcome.

Well-intentioned is not always beneficial: Why we should question prescription habits

Well-intentioned is not always beneficial: Why we should question prescription habits

Prescription habits and drugs accessibility for the treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacteria infections in Italy: a multicentric survey from the IRENE study group

Prescription habits and drugs accessibility for the treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacteria infections in Italy: a multicentric survey from the IRENE study group

Design and Implementation of an Opioid Scorecard for Hospital System-Wide Peer Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Habits: Observational Study.

Reductions in opioid prescribing by health care providers can lead to a decreased risk of opioid dependence in patients. Peer comparison has been demonstrated to impact providers' prescribing habits, though its effect on opioid prescribing has predominantly been studied in the emergency department setting. The purpose of this study is to describe the development of an enterprise-wide opioid scorecard, the architecture of its implementation, and plans for future research on its effects. Using data generated by the author's enterprise vendor-based electronic health record, the enterprise analytics software, and expertise from a dedicated group of informaticists, physicians, and analysts, the authors developed an opioid scorecard that was released on a quarterly basis via email to all opioid prescribers at our institution. These scorecards compare providers' opioid prescribing habits on the basis of established metrics to those of their peers within their specialty throughout the enterprise. At the time of this study's completion, 2034 providers have received at least 1 scorecard over a 5-quarter period ending in September 2021. Poisson regression demonstrated a 1.6% quarterly reduction in opioid prescribing, and chi-square analysis demonstrated pre-post reductions in the proportion of prescriptions longer than 5 days' duration and a morphine equivalent daily dose of >50. To our knowledge, this is the first peer comparison effort with high-quality evidence-based metrics of this scale published in the literature. By sharing this process for designing the metrics and the process of distribution, the authors hope to influence other health systems to attempt to curb the opioid pandemic through peer comparison. Future research examining the effects of this intervention could demonstrate significant reductions in opioid prescribing, thus potentially reducing the progression of individual patients to opioid use disorder and the associated increased risk of morbidity and mortality.

United States opioid prescribing trends after shoulder surgery and their correlation with opioid misuse

BACKGROUNDOrthopedic surgery has been highlighted as a contributor to the opioid epidemic. There is a paucity of literature focused specifically on opioid prescribing trends following shoulder surgery. Our aims were to describe national and regional trends in opioid prescribing following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), proximal humerus fracture fixation, and rotator cuff repair (RCR), and to correlate opioid prescribing trends after shoulder surgery with regional heroin use and new opioid misuse diagnoses. METHODSThis is a retrospective study of 218,577 patients from a commercial insurance dataset who had undergone orthopedic shoulder procedures from 2014-2020. Opioid prescription data within 90-day postop were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Multivariate modelling was used to evaluate independent associations between MME’s prescribed and subsequent new postoperative diagnosis of opioid dependence. Additionally, longitudinal mixed effects modeling was employed to understand aggregated prescriber habits by state over time and the subsequent effects on estimates of state heroin use and drug overdose deaths. RESULTSFrom 2014 to 2020, the mean number of MMEs prescribed nationally decreased by over 50% for TSA, proximal humerus fracture fixation, and RCR. Over the study period, most states demonstrated an overall downtrend of 90-day opioid prescribing for these procedures.Individuals with a new opioid misuse diagnosis following shoulder surgery were found to be younger (SMD=0.27, p<0.001), have increased comorbidities (SMD=0.38, p<0.001), and increased MME’s prescribed (SMD=0.94, p<0.001). Increased comorbidity score (OR=3.28, p<0.001) and increased 90-day MME’s prescribed (OR=1.05, p<0.001) were all found to increase the odds ratio of a postoperative opioid misuse diagnosis in patient’s undergoing shoulder surgery, while increased age (OR=0.97, p<0.001) and patient’s undergoing RCR (OR=0.79, p=0.001) were found to have a decreased odds ratio of developing a new opioid misuse diagnosis.The predictors of regional heroin use included the within-state 90-day MMEs prescribed (p=0.002). The predictors of drug overdose death included year (p<0.001), but did not include type of surgery or 90-day MMEs. CONCLUSIONOrthopedic surgeons successfully reduced the number of opioids prescribed nationally after shoulder surgeries by over 50% during our study period with similar trends seen at the state level. Our data indicate a relationship between increased opioid prescribing after shoulder surgery and heroin use. This study highlights that while progress has been made, there is evidence that opioid prescribing following shoulder surgery is associated with the more widespread opioid epidemic, and that more research is needed to further lower postoperative opioid misuse in the future.

Implementation of a fluid balance control strategy in critically ill patients: POINCARE-2 trial process evaluation

BackgroundPOINCARE-2 trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of a strategy designed to tackle fluid overload through daily weighing and subsequent administration of treatments in critically ill patients. Even in highly standardized care settings, such as intensive care units, effectiveness of such a complex intervention depends on its actual efficacy but also on the extent of its implementation. Using a process evaluation, we aimed to provide understanding of the implementation, context, and mechanisms of change of POINCARE-2 strategy during the trial, to gain insight on its effectiveness and inform the decision regarding the dissemination of the intervention.MethodsWe conducted a mixed-method process evaluation following the Medical Research Council guideline. Both quantitative data derived from the trial, and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with professionals were used to explain implementation, mechanisms of change of the POINCARE-2 strategy, as well as contextual factors potentially influencing implementation of the strategy.ResultsScore of actual exposure to the strategy ranged from 29.1 to 68.2% during the control period, and from 61.9 to 92.3% during the intervention period, suggesting both potential contamination and suboptimal fidelity to the strategy. Lack of appropriate weighing devices, lack of human resources dedicated to research, pre-trial rooted prescription habits, and anticipated knowledge of the strategy have been identified as the main barriers to optimal implementation of the strategy in the trial context.ConclusionsBoth contamination and suboptimal fidelity to POINCARE-2 strategy raised concerns about a potential bias towards the null of intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. However, optimal fidelity seemed reachable. Consequently, a clinical strategy should not be rejected solely on the basis of the negativity of ITT analyses’ results. Our findings showed that, even in highly standardized care conditions, the implementation of clinical strategies may be hindered by numerous contextual factors, which demonstrates the critical importance of assessing the viability of an intervention, prior to any evaluation of its effectiveness.Trial registrationNumber NCT02765009

Potential barriers to the rational antibiotic use in dental and periodontal practice: A questionnaire-based online survey.

Dentists, through inappropriate antibiotic prescription, may contribute to the global problem of antibiotic resistance (AR). Understanding dentists' antibiotic prescription patterns, source of knowledge, and the driving forces behind their prescription practices may be crucial for the effective implementation of the rational use of antibiotics (RUA) in dentistry. Active members of the Turkish Dental Association were invited to participate in an electronic survey comprising questions focusing on their role, knowledge and perceptions regarding RUA, the perceived barriers to adapting RUA in daily dental work, and the actual antibiotic prescription practices. The potential impact of age, gender, professional experience, and the mode of dental practice was also evaluated. Dentists' prescription practices for periodontal disease/conditions were evaluated as well. Based on 1,005 valid responses, there was consensus on the necessity of RUA (99.1%); however, its implementation was low. The main barriers were dentists' own safety concerns (74.4%), strong patients' demands (42.2%) and the fact that prescribing antibiotics became a professional habit (35.8%). Different educational background resulted in clear variances in everyday prescription practices. The implementation of RUA was not sufficient and the perceived barriers had an impact on daily prescribing habits. Support for dental professionals through the efficient dissemination of evidencebased clinical guidelines and decision-making aids is likely to require additional help from professional organizations in order to actively combat AR.

Antibiotic prescribing patterns among dentists in Italy and Albania: A comparative questionnaire analysis

ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic and prophylactic use of antibiotics in dentistry in two countries. MethodsThis study used questionnaires to examine the prescribing habits of dentists in Italy (9th country in Europe for systemic antibiotic administration) and Albania an Extra European Union Country. A total of 1300 questionnaires were sent to Italian and Albanian dentists. ResultsIn total, 180 Italian and 180 Albanian dentists completed the questionnaire. Penicillin use was higher in Italy (96.6 %) than Albania (82.8 %). Only 26.1 % of Italian dentists and 32 % of Albanian dentists followed the national guidelines for antibiotic administration. ConclusionsDentists tend to overprescribe antibiotics for treating existing conditions or as prophylaxis. They also highlighted a lack of adherence to established guidelines for antibiotic use. In addition, factors such as age, nationality, and sex appeared to influence the choice of antibiotics. Clinical significanceRecently, the growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has become a global concern. The authors of this article highlight how dentists often prescribe antibiotics without a real need. Limiting the use of antibiotics in this category may help mitigate antibiotic resistance.

National Long-Term Trends in Postoperative Opioid Prescribing in Ambulatory Urology Procedures.

With more than 60% of urological procedures performed in ambulatory settings, it is imperative to understand the current trends in postoperative narcotic prescriptions and their adherence to the guidelines. We studied postoperative opioid-prescribing patterns after selected common urology ambulatory procedures. A retrospective cohort was derived from a 10% random sample of enrollees within the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics database from 2015 to 2021. Patient-level baseline characteristics were collected in the year preceding the index date. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were used to compare patient characteristics from opioid and nonopioid cohorts and those who utilized opioids ≤ 7 days and > 7 days postprocedurally. Trends of opioid and nonopioid use were also investigated and compared. Between 2015 to 2021, 17,817 patients underwent urological ambulatory procedures, of which the majority (90.9%) were endoscopic procedures. Of those, 4077 (22%) were prescribed opioids and 978 (5.4%) patients were given prescription nonopioid (ie, ketorolac) medication. From 2015 to 2021, there was an overall decrease in prescription of opioids from 32% to 19%. The acute fulfillment (within 7 days of the procedure) of opioids had notably declined; however, there is a slight increase in the fulfillment of opioids beyond 7 days. Within the 7-day postsurgical period after ambulatory procedures, narcotic prescribing habits among urologists are congruent with current initiatives to reduce narcotic use in the setting of the opioid pandemic. However, beyond the 7-day postsurgical period, further guidelines are needed to guide narcotic prescribing habits.

Comparative trends of brucellosis serological testing and confirmed brucellosis cases suggest inappropriate prescription habits

BackgroundBrucellosis is a zoonosis endemic to specific geographical regions. In first line laboratories, diagnosis is made by blood culture or Rose Bengal (RB) serology. MethodsWe compare brucellosis testing between 2012-2021 at two university hospitals in Brussels, Belgium with concomitant national confirmed cases and institutional cases. ResultsRB testing increased from 30 to 211 tests/year between 2012-2021. A total of fifty-two national brucellosis cases were notified during the study period, of which fifteen cases in Brussels. No trend was noted nationally or regionally. Epidemiological data indicated travel to endemic regions, confirmed by strain testing. Institutional cases all showed symptomatic presentations with positive travel histories. ConclusionsSerologic testing inappropriately increases yearly, while annual imported brucellosis cases remain rare, and have positive travel histories and are symptomatic. We therefore support current recommendations of limiting RB testing to symptomatic patients at risk of exposure, meaning predominantly positive recent travel history.

The persistent benefits of decreasing default pill counts for postoperative narcotic prescriptions.

In 2017, a university-based academic healthcare system changed the opioid default pill count from 30 to 12 pills. Modifying the electronic default pill count influences short-term clinician prescribing practices. We sought to understand the long-term impact on postoperative opioid prescribing habits after an opioid default pill count reduction. A retrospective electronic medical record system (EMRS) review was conducted in a healthcare system comprised of seven affiliated hospitals. Patients who underwent a surgical procedure and were prescribed an opioid on discharge between 2017-2021 were evaluated. All prescriptions were converted into morphine equivalents (MME). Analyses were performed with the chi-square test and Bonferonni adjusted t-test. 191,379 surgical procedures were studied. The average quantity of opioids prescribed decreased from 32 oxycodone 5 mg tablets in 2017 to 21 oxycodone 5 mg tablets in 2021 (236 MME to 154 MME, p<0.001). The percentage of patients obtaining a refill within 90 days of surgery varied between 18.3% and 19.9% (p<0.001). Patients with a pre-existing opioid prescription and opioid-naïve patients both had significant reductions in prescription quantities above the default MME (79.7% to 60.6% vs. 65.3% to 36.9%, p<0.001). There was no significant change in refills for both groups (pre-existing 36.7% to 38.3% (p = 0.1) vs naïve 15.0% to 15.3% (p = 0.29)). The benefits of decreasing the default opioid pill count continue to accumulate long after the original change. Physician uptake of small changes to default EMRS practices represents a sustainable and effective intervention to reduce the quantities of postoperative opioids prescribed without deleterious effects on outpatient opiate requirements.

Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Prescription and Consumption in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: A Gateway to the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship is an important action plan for curbing the rising trend of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Surveillance of antimicrobial use and consumption is needed as baseline data and for monitoring the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The survey was done to understand the burden of AMR, in view of establishing an antimicrobial stewardship program in our hospital. Methods: A point prevalence survey (PPS) of antimicrobial use and consumption was conducted on all inpatients admitted before 8.00 am on the days of the survey using a standardized questionnaire. The collected data were entered online into the Global PPS web-based application (www.global-pps.com), for analysis. Result: Of the 178 patients admitted during the survey period, 50.6% were on one or more antimicrobial agents. All the patients in adult intensive care units were on antibiotics (100%), followed by neonatal intensive care units (83.3%), with the least being adult medical wards (39.4%). Beta-lactam antibiotics were the most frequently prescribed antimicrobial for various infections, especially skin and soft tissue infections, 41.3%, which were the most common diagnoses treated with antibiotics. The infection was mostly community-acquired (81.6%), of which 94.9% were treated empirically. There was no written guideline in existence. Conclusion: The present study revealed a poor prescribing habit because of a high rate of empirical treatment. The need for antimicrobial stewardship cannot be overemphasized as it will help streamline and improve the prescribing pattern.

Prescribing Habits for Pregnant Patients in a Sample of Psychiatry Residents at Ibn Nafis Psychiatric Hospital: A Descriptive Study

Prescribing psychotropics for pregnant women is a delicate issue as most drugs cross the placenta. There are concerns about possible hazards to the growing fetus and balancing the risk of malformation against the risk of a psychiatric condition relapsing is a common dilemma. To minimize the risks associated with polypharmacy monotherapy is typically the preferred approach. This study aimed to explore the prescription habits of psychotropic medications to pregnant women by residents at IBN NAFIS University Psychiatric Center and review it in the light of literature. 25 residents took part. We found that for agitation, 93% of residents prescribed classic antipsychotics. For major depressive disorder, 81% of residents prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). For anxiety disorders, 68% of the sample prescribed SSRIs. For manic episodes, 50% of residents prescribed lamotrigine, 12% prescribed olanzapine, 6% preferred sodium valproate, 6% prescribed classic antipsychotics. For psychotic disorders, the vast majority of residents prescribed classic antipsychotics (88%), while 6% of them prescribed Risperidone and the remaining 6% preferred the use of Olanzapine. For insomnia, the majority of residents in the sample preferred prescribing hydroxyzine (69%). Oxazepam is considered a first-line anxiolytic because it doesn't create active metabolites. Classic antipsychotics like haloperidol and chlorpromazine are commonly prescribed during pregnancy due to their proven efficacy and safety. Atypical antipsychotics like olanzapine risperidone quetiapine and clozapine are used, with olanzapine being a first-line treatment due to reassuring data on fetal side effects. Thymoregulators like lamotrigine can be used but caution is advised due to potential risks. Antidepressants like tricyclics and SSRIs are commonly prescribed with SSRIs being preferred for pregnant women. The study emphasizes the importance of taking into account the particulars of the drugs such ...

Prevalence and appropriateness of omeprazole prescription in dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital before and after the publication of the ACVIM consensus statement on the rational administration of gastrointestinal protectants.

Overprescribing of acid suppressants is a common phenomenon in human and small animal patients, leading to potential deleterious gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI consequences. The impact of consensus statements on veterinary prescribing habits in clinical practice have not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to compare the prescribing habits of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI), omeprazole, in dogs in an academic veterinary teaching hospital before and after the publication of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) consensus statement on rational use of gastrointestinal protectants. Evaluation of the prescribing habits of omeprazole in dogs during the years 2017 and 2021 was retrospectively compared. These years were selected to reflect a 12-month period prior to and following the publication of the consensus statement. One hundred dogs from each year were randomly selected. Dose, frequency of administration, duration of treatment, concurrent prescription of more than one gastroprotectant and indications for prescribing omeprazole were analyzed. A significant increase in the cases that received omeprazole q12h (p < 0.0001) or that underwent a tapering dose after ≥4 week-therapy (p > 0.0001) was detected after the publication of the 2018 ACVIM consensus statement. Considering the indications, there was also a significant increase in the appropriate prescription of omeprazole in the second compared to the first period of study (p < 0.0001). Fifteen of 16 clinicians (94%) involved in the prescription of omeprazole indicated that their reading of the consensus statement had changed their clinical practice regarding PPI administration in dogs. These results support the beneficial impact of the ACVIM consensus statement on the judicious prescribing of omeprazole in an academic veterinary hospital. These results should not be extrapolated to first-opinion veterinary practices, and further efforts should be made to ensure that PPIs are prescribed prudently with a clear indication and regular review of the appropriateness of continued administration to minimize possible risks and adverse drug interactions.

Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury in Non-Critical Medical Patients in a Developing Country Tertiary Hospital: Incidence and Predictors.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in critical patients, leading to a worse prognosis. Although its consequences are worse among critical patients, AKI is also associated with less favorable outcomes in non-critical patients. Therefore, understanding the magnitude of the problem in these patients is crucial, yet there is a scarcity of evidence in non-critical settings, especially in resource limited countries. Hence, the study aimed at determining the incidence and predictors of hospital acquired acute kidney injury (HAAKI) in non-critical medical patients who were admitted at a large tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. A retrospective chart review study was conducted from September 25, 2022 to January 20, 2023 among 232 hospitalized non-critical medical patients admitted to St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College between January 2020 and January 2022. The incidence of HAAKI was estimated using incidence density per total person day (PD) observation of the study participants. To identify predictors of HAAKI, a log binomial regression model was fitted at a p value of ≤0.05. The magnitude of association was measured using adjusted relative risk (ARR) with its 95% CI. During the median follow-up duration of 11 days (IQR, 6-19 days), the incidence of HAAKI was estimated to be 6.0 per 100 PD (95% CI = 5.5 to 7.2). Significant predictors of HAAKI were found to be having type 2 diabetes mellitus (ARR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.03, 5.39, p-value=0.042), and taking vancomycin (ARR = 3.04, 95% CI = 1.38, 6.72, p-value=0.006) and proton pump inhibitors (ARR = 3.80, 95% CI = 1.34,10.82, p-value=0.012). HAAKI is a common complication in hospitalized non-critical medical patients, and is associated with a common medical condition and commonly prescribed medications. Therefore, it is important to remain vigilant in the prevention and timely identification of these cases and to establish a system of rational prescribing habits.

Antibiotic Over-Prescription by Dentists in the Treatment of Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the global pattern of antibiotic prescription in the treatment of apical disease. PRISMA Guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. The research question was as follows: What is the pattern of antibiotic prescription by dentists in the treatment of the different clinical forms of apical periodontitis? A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, Wiley Online Database, Web of Science and Scopus. All studies reporting data about the pattern of antibiotic prescription by dentists in the treatment of apical disease were included. The meta-analyses were calculated using the Open Meta Analyst version 10.10 software. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The search strategy identified 96 articles and thirty-nine cross-sectional studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall percentage of antibiotic prescriptions by dentists in cases of symptomatic AP was 25.8%, and 31.5% in cases of asymptomatic AP with sinus tract present. The percentage of dentists prescribing antibiotics in cases of acute apical abscess with no/mild symptoms was 47.7%, whereas, in cases of acute apical abscess with moderate/severe symptoms, 88.8% of dentists would prescribe antibiotics. Endodontists prescribe antibiotics at a lower rate than general practitioners. The total risk of bias was considered moderate, and the final rating for the certainty of the evidence was low. Dentists worldwide are over-prescribing antibiotics in the management of apical disease. It is necessary to improve antibiotic prescribing habits in the treatment of endodontic infections, as well as educational initiatives to encourage the rational and appropriate prescription of antibiotics in periapical diseases.

Effects of a Training Course for Andalusian Podiatrists on Antibiotic Management in Ingrown Toenail Infections: A Pilot Study.

The use of antibiotics (ABs) for the prevention and management of infections has been widespread for decades and, at this time, AB resistance is a global health crisis. The available evidence highlights the need to reduce the prophylactic and therapeutic use of ABs to avoid associated risks. A preliminary study with a total sample of 56 Andalusian (Spain) podiatrists was surveyed. The purpose of this study was to identify whether there were changes in prescription habits from a situation before a subsequent training course on AB indications for the management of infections associated with ingrown toenails. An ad hoc questionnaire of 15 items related to therapeutic and prophylactic prescriptions of ABs was developed for this purpose, and the evaluation was carried out before and after the training course. The responses obtained before and after training were compared. The training activity led to improvements in the prescription habits of the participants, producing significant changes in the prescription pattern of the professionals in 10 of the 15 items. The results of this preliminary study show that the podiatrists surveyed improved the rational use of systemic AB therapy in ingrown toenails infections.

Predictors of adequate pain control after outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery.

The opioid epidemic has changed practice, though there remains a paucity of data regarding prescribing habits and pain control following outpatient hand surgery. We sought to evaluate patient-related predictors of adequate postoperative pain control. A retrospective review was performed of a single-center prospectively collected database of elective outpatient surgery on the elbow, forearm, wrist, and/or hand. Patients were asked to complete preoperative and postoperative questionnaires to capture their perception of anticipated pain levels, expected prescription quantity/duration, additional medications used, and overall pain satisfaction. Patient demographics collected included, sex, age, race, tobacco use, and recreational drug use. Further, the questionnaire included the Brief Resilience Score (BRS), EuroQol 5-dimension health-related QOL measure (EQ-5D), and an assessment of patient-reported limitations secondary to their pain. Ninety-six patients completed the pre/postoperative questionnaires and were eligible for analysis. Of these patients, 80% reported adequate pain control. The sex, age, and race of those who reported adequate pain control and inadequate control were not significantly different. BRS scores were not found to be significantly different between groups, although EQ-5D QOL scores were significantly lower in the inadequately controlled group. Tobacco use was more prevalent in the inadequately controlled group. Marijuana use and the presence of a chronic pain diagnosis were not significantly different between groups. Preoperative self-reported quality of life measures and tobacco use appear to have significant effects on postoperative opioid use, suggesting further areas of optimization which may ensure patients are safe and minimize the number of opioid pills required.

Pattern of central nervous system related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to anti-retroviral therapy in HIV infected patients in tertiary care hospitals in North India

Background: Anti-retroviral therapy is associated with myriads of side-effects. Central nervous system related side effects are troublesome and mostly self limiting. Working knowledge of these side effects can improve the prescription habits of physicians. The study aimed pattern of central system related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to anti-retroviral therapy in HIV infected patients in tertiary care hospitals in North India. Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted and all HIV positive patients, previously registered and new; attending OPD who encountered ADRs were enrolled in our study irrespective of their age and sex. Data was collected using ADR reporting form issued by Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. Causality assessment was done by using Naranjo’s Probability Scale. Modified Hartwig severity scale was used to evaluate severity, WHO criteria for seriousness and guidelines of council for international organizations of medical sciences to decide the predictability of ADRs. Results: A total of 250 patients encountered various types of ADRs during the study period. Total number of ADRs recorded was 452. Out of total ADRs (n=452) recorded, 20.35% (n=92) were central system related ADRs. Most common central nervous system related ADR was dizziness. Most central nervous system related ADRs were of moderate type and possible in nature on causality assessment. Conclusion: Relatively overweight, older age and baseline CD4 absolute count below 250 cells/mm3, were predictors for central nervous system related side effects due to anti-retroviral therapy in HIV patients. We suggest that more stringent evaluation and monitoring should be carefully done in all HIV/AIDS patients who will receive and on efavirenz based anti-retroviral therapy, especially if they have the above predictors.

The pharmacists' interventions after a Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) establishment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Healthcare systems in developing countries faced significant challenges during COVID-19, grappling with limited resources and staffing shortages. Assessment of the impact of pharmaceutical care expertise, particularly in critical care units during the pandemics, in developing countries remains poorly explored. The principal aim of our study was to assess the impact of the Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC), comprising clinical pharmacists, on the incidence, types, and severity of medication errors and associated costs in using COVID-19 medications, especially antibiotics. An interventional pre-post study was carried out at a public isolation hospital in Egypt over 6 months. Out of 499 medication orders, 238 (47.7%) had medication errors, averaging 2.38 errors per patient. The most frequent were prescribing errors (44.9%), specifically incorrect drug choice (57.9%), excessive dosage (29.9%), treatment duplication (4.5%), inadequate dosage (4.5%), and overlooked indications (3.6%). Linezolid and Remdesivir were the most common medications associated with prescribing errors. Pharmacists intervened 315 times, primarily discontinuing medications, reducing doses, introducing new medications, and increasing doses. These actions led to statistically significant cost reductions (p < 0.05) and better clinical outcomes; improved oxygen saturation, decreased fever, stabilised respiratory rates, and normalised white blood cell counts. So, clinical pharmacist interventions made a notable clinical and economic difference (66.34% reduction of the expenses) in antibiotics usage specifically and other medications used in COVID-19 management during the pandemic. Crucially, educational initiatives targeting clinical pharmacists can foster judicious prescribing habits.