Prescribing For Respiratory Infections Research Articles

Risk of unintended consequences from lower antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in primary care

About 60% of antibiotic prescribing in primary care is for respiratory tract infections (RTIs), some of which is likely unnecessary. There is limited evidence on the association between reduced antibiotic prescribing and adverse events. We aimed to identify associations between practice-level prescribing rates for RTIs in general practice, and patient-level adverse outcomes. We included 1471 English General Practitioner (GP) practices, linked to hospital admissions in England, from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink for 2005 to 2019. Outcomes were hospitalisations, RTI-related re-consultations and additional antibiotic prescriptions, adjusted for practice level case-mix prescribing. Prescribing rates for practices falling within the lowest and highest prescribing quintiles were 52 and 139 prescriptions per 1000 RTI-related consultations. Patients from practices in the lowest prescribing quintile did not have significantly higher risk of hospitalisation, adjusted odds ratio 0·99 (95% CI 0·96 to 1·02). Re-consultations within 30 days were significantly higher for the lowest prescribing practices, adjusted odds ratio 1·209 (1·206 to 1·212). Additional antibiotic prescriptionsand subsequent prescriptions upon re-consultationwere significantly lower for the lowest prescribing practices, adjusted odds ratio 0·317 (0·314 to 0·321) and 0·706 (0·699 to 0·712), respectively. Our results contribute to evidence on the safety of reduced antibiotic prescribing for RTIs in primary care. Results suggest that for the majority of practices, further reductions in RTI-related antibiotic prescribing should be possible without an increase in hospitalisation for pneumonia.

Impact of Educational Films on Antibiotic Prescription among Physicians: A Web-Based Survey in Japan.

Although antibiotics are most frequently prescribed for respiratory tract infections, effective interventions for their proper use by physicians have not been fully established. We assessed the impact of educational films on the rates of antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections using fictitious scenarios. In this nationwide web-based survey prospective study, a total of 1100 physicians were included. The physicians were required to view educational short films and determine the need for prescribing antibiotics in 10 fictitious scenarios involving adults diagnosed with different acute respiratory tract infectious diseases. The antibiotic prescription rates for each scenario were compared before and after viewing the educational short film. The rates of antibiotic prescription significantly decreased after viewing the educational film, especially in cases with a narrowly defined common cold (from 51% to 15%), mild pharyngolaryngitis (from 71% to 25%), and acute bronchitis without chronic respiratory underlying diseases (from 63% to 23%). Alternatively, a slight decrease in rates was observed in cases with moderate or severe rhinosinusitis (from 94% to 79%), moderate or severe acute pharyngitis (from 88% to 69%), and acute bronchitis with chronic lung disease (from 70% to 58%), for which antibiotics are recommended. Educational short films may encourage the proper use of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections; however, the possibility of undertreatment in patients requiring antibiotics must be considered.

Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in urgent care: a comparison of in-person and virtual settings.

Little is known about antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in virtual versus in-person urgent care within the same health system. This is a retrospective study using electronic health record data from Cleveland Clinic Health System. We identified RTI patients via ICD-10 codes and assessed whether the visit resulted in an antibiotic. We described differences in diagnoses and prescribing by type of urgent care (virtual versus in-person.) We used mixed effects logistic regression to model the odds of a patient receiving an antibiotic by urgent care setting. We applied the model first to all physicians and second only to those who saw patients in both settings. There were 69,189 in-person and 19,003 virtual visits. Fifty-eight percent of virtual visits resulted in an antibiotic compared to 43% of in-person visits. Sinusitis diagnoses were more than twice as common in virtual versus in-person care (36% versus 14%) and were associated with high rates of prescribing in both settings (95% in person, 91% virtual). Compared to in-person care, virtual urgent care was positively associated with a prescription (OR:1.64, 95%CI:1.53-1.75). Among visits conducted by 39 physicians who saw patients in both settings, odds of antibiotic prescription in virtual care were 1.71 times higher than in in-person care (95%CI:1.53-1.90). Antibiotic prescriptions were more common in virtual versus in-person urgent care settings, including among physicians who provided care in both platforms. This appears to be related to the high rate of sinusitis diagnosis in virtual urgent care.

Factors influencing antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in primary care – a comparison of physicians with different antibiotic prescribing rates

Background There has been a notable decrease in antibiotic prescribing in the last thirty years in Sweden. Little is known about factors influencing antibiotic prescribing over several years. Objective To compare primary care physicians who, over time, reduced their antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections with those who remained either high or low prescribers regarding potentially influencing factors. Design and setting A register-based study including all RTI visits in primary care in Region Kronoberg, Sweden 2006–2014. The data were divided into three 3-year periods. Subjects The data comprised all physicians who had diagnosed at least one RTI for each of the three-year periods. The antibiotic prescribing rate adjusted for the patients’ sex and age group was calculated for each physician and period, and based on the change between the first and the third period, the physicians were divided into three prescriber groups: The High Prescribing Group, the Decreasing Prescribing Group, and the Low Prescribing Group. Main outcome measures For the three prescriber groups, we compared factors influencing antibiotic prescribing such as the characteristics of the physicians, their use of point-of-care tests, their choice of diagnoses, and whether the patients returned and received antibiotics. Results The High Prescribing Group ordered more point-of-care tests, registered more potential bacterial diagnoses, prescribed antibiotics at lower C-reactive protein levels, and prescribed antibiotics more often despite negative group A Streptococci test than in the Low Prescribing Group. The Decreasing Prescribing Group was between the High Prescribing Group and the Low Prescribing Group regarding these variables. The lower prescription rate in the Low Prescribing Group did not result in more return visits or new antibiotic prescriptions within 30 days. Conclusion Point-of-care testing and its interpretation differed between the prescriber groups. Focus on interpreting point-of-care test results could be a way forward in antibiotic stewardship.

Perception and views about individualising antibiotic duration for respiratory tract infections when patients feel better: a qualitative study with primary care professionals

BackgroundEvidence shows a high rate of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care. There is increasing evidence showing that shorter courses for RTIs are safe and...

Communication training for general practitioners aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing: a controlled before-after study in multicultural Dutch cities.

IntroductionSuboptimal doctor-patient communication drives inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. We evaluated a communication intervention for general practitioners (GPs) in multicultural Dutch cities to improve antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTI).MethodsThis was a non-randomized controlled before-after study. The study period was pre-intervention November 2019 – April 2020 and post-intervention November 2021 – April 2022. The intervention consisted of a live training (organized between September and November 2021), an E-learning, and patient material on antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in multiple languages. The primary outcome was the absolute number of prescribed antibiotic courses indicated for RTIs per GP; the secondary outcome was all prescribed antibiotics per GP. We compared the post-intervention differences in the mean number of prescribed antibiotics between the intervention (N = 25) and the control group (N = 110) by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test, while adjusting for the pre-intervention number of prescribed antibiotics. Additionally, intervention GPs rated the training and their knowledge and skills before the intervention and 3 months thereafter.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the mean number of prescribed antibiotics for RTI between the intervention and the control group, nor for mean number of overall prescribed antibiotics. The intervention GPs rated the usefulness of the training for daily practice a 7.3 (on a scale from 1–10) and there was a statistically significant difference between pre- and post-intervention on four out of nine items related to knowledge and skills.DiscussionThere was no change in GPs prescription behavior between the intervention and control group. However, GPs found the intervention useful and showed some improvement on self-rated knowledge and communication skills.

2264. Shorter Duration of Visit Associated with Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections in a National Sample of Ambulatory Visits, 2009 - 2016

Abstract Background Due to the reported decrease in the duration of primary care visits, it is important to assess provider adherence to guidelines when treating respiratory infections that are unlikely to necessitate antimicrobial treatment. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the duration of visit and unnecessary antibiotic prescribing while considering patient and provider factors, including age, sex, race, and diagnosis. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional study used outpatient, office-based data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2009 to 2016. All patients with a primary diagnosis of bronchitis, viral respiratory tract infection, influenza, and viral pneumonia were included for analysis. Patients with diagnoses that almost always require an antibiotic were excluded. Diagnoses were identified using ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes. Inappropriate antibiotic use was identified using multum codes and defined as at least one prescribed oral antibiotic during the visit. Provider status was defined as physician only or other provider. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine predictors of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Data weights were applied to all analyses to generate national estimates. Results A total of 226,250,589 patient visits were included in the analysis, of which 83,404,484 (36.9%) resulted in an inappropriately prescribed antibiotic. Patients prescribed antibiotics were older (median age 42 vs. 13 years) and more often White (82.4% vs. 79.6%). After adjustment for covariates, time spent with provider less than 15 minutes (aOR 1.866, 95% CI 1.862-1.869), patient age 18-64 years (aOR 2.408, 95% CI 2.406-2.410), other provider types only (aOR 1.790, 95% CI 1.785-1.794), and viral pneumonia diagnosis (aOR 68.432, 95% CI 66.691-69.936) were most strongly associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion This study found that patients who spent less time with providers, had viral pneumonia, and were aged 18-64 years old were more likely to receive inappropriate treatment. Further investigation is necessary to determine reasons for inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing among outpatients. Disclosures Kelly Reveles, PharmD, PhD, Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria

Perceptions and attitudes regarding delayed antibiotic prescription for respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study

BackgroundAntibiotics are overprescribed for respiratory tract infections (RTIs). However, the decision to prescribe is often complex. Delayed antibiotic prescription (DAP), a strategy designed to promote more rational antibiotic use, is still not widely used. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions and attitudes in primary care professionals, regarding antibiotic use and different DAP strategies for uncomplicated RTIs.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study, using an inductive thematic approach to generate themes, based on focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews with professionals, recruited from 6 primary care centres (Barcelona metropolitan area, Spain).Results26 professionals (25 family physicians and one nurse) were included in four focus group discussions and three semi-structured interviews. Participants commented that RTIs were a main reason for consultation, motivated often by patient anxiety and fear of possible complications, and this was associated with the patients’ poor health-related education. Acknowledging inappropriate antibiotic use in the health system, participants attributed this, mainly to defensive medicine strategies. DAP was used when in doubt about the aetiology, and considering factors related to patient-physician interactions. The main perceived advantage of DAP was that it could reduce the need for additional visits, while the main disadvantage was uncertainty regarding proper use by the patient.ConclusionsDAP was used by participants in cases of doubt, in specific situations, and for specific patient profiles. Weak points were detected in our primary care system and its users that affect the proper use of both antibiotics and DAP, namely, time pressure on professionals, poor patient health-related education, and the lack of a patient-physician relationship in some scenarios.

A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of antibiotic prescription strategies for non-complicated respiratory tract infections in children

BackgroundAntibiotic prescription for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in children attending primary care centres is almost double that predicted according to bacterial prevalence. Delayed antibiotic prescription (DAP) is designed to deploy a more rational use of antibiotics. While studies have evaluated DAP efficacy and safety for children with RTIs, little research has been conducted on the economic implications.MethodsOur trial compared cost-effectiveness for DAP, immediate antibiotic prescription (IAP), and no antibiotic prescription (NAP) for children aged 2–14 years with acute uncomplicated RTIs attended to in 39 primary care centres in Spain. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured in euros per gained quality-adjusted life days (QALDs). Net monetary benefit (NMB) was also calculated as a tool for decision making. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective for a time horizon of 30 days, and included healthcare direct costs, non-healthcare direct and indirect costs, and the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) cost.ResultsDAP was the most cost-effective strategy, even when the cost of AMR was included. QALD values for the three strategies were very similar. IAP compared to DAP was more costly (109.68 vs 100.90 euros) and similarly effective (27.88 vs 27.94 QALDs). DAP compared to NAP was more costly (100.90 vs 97.48 euros) and more effective (27.94 vs. 27.82 QALDs). The ICER for DAP compared to NAP was 28.84 euros per QALD. The deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that non-healthcare indirect costs had the greatest impact on the ICER. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed that DAP was the preferred option in approximately 81.75% of Monte Carlo iterations, assuming a willingness-to-pay value of 82.2 euros per gained QALD.ConclusionsWhen clinicians are in doubt about whether an antibiotic is needed for children with RTIs attending PC centres, those treated with the DAP strategy will have slightly better efficiency outcomes than those treated with IAP because its costs are lower than those of IAP. DAP is also the most cost-effective strategy over a time horizon of 30 days if AMR is considered, despite higher short-term costs than NAP. However, if in the long term the costs of AMR are larger than estimated, NAP could also be an alternative strategy.Trial registrationThis trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT01800747; Date: 28/02/2013 (retrospectively registered).

An Increase in Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections Through Telehealth Consultations: Retrospective Study in Australian General Practice

An Increase in Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections Through Telehealth Consultations: Retrospective Study in Australian General Practice

EHealthResp, a Digital Intervention to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing in Respiratory Infections: A Pilot Study.

The emergence of antibiotic resistance (ABR) is one of the most serious public health threats worldwide. The inappropriate use of antibiotics is considered the main determinant for the increase and development of ABR, contributing to a greater risk of therapeutic ineffectiveness, particularly within primary care context. Therefore, this pilot study aims to raise awareness and promote an adequate antibiotic use among physicians, through the evaluation of the eHealthResp platform, a digital intervention composed by an online course and a mobile application, to aid in the management of respiratory tract infections. The global validation of the eHealthResp platform was carried out by 12 physicians who explored and performed a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the contents of the online course and mobile app. The global evaluation of the analyzed parameters was very positive, with the highest median scores being attributed to adequacy, correction, format, and trust of the eHealthResp platform. The qualitative feedback enhanced the contents’ relevance, clarity, and consolidation, as well as the effectiveness of the educational intervention against ABR. Overall, this study revealed that the eHealthResp may be regarded as an important e-health tool for the management of respiratory tract infections and improvement of antibiotic prescription practices among physicians.

The Role of Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing in Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections: A Survey among Swiss General Practitioners.

Understanding the decision-making strategies of general practitioners (GPs) could help reduce suboptimal antibiotic prescribing. Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are the most common reason for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in primary care, a key driver of antibiotic resistance (ABR). We conducted a nationwide prospective web-based survey to explore: (1) The role of C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing (POCT) on antibiotic prescribing decision-making for RTIs using case vignettes; and (2) the knowledge, attitudes and barriers/facilitators of antibiotic prescribing using deductive analysis. Most GPs (92–98%) selected CRP-POCT alone or combined with other diagnostics. GPs would use lower CRP cut-offs to guide prescribing for (more) severe RTIs than for uncomplicated RTIs. Intermediate CRP ranges were significantly wider for uncomplicated than for (more) severe RTIs (p = 0.001). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was the most frequently recommended antibiotic across all RTI case scenarios (65–87%). Faced with intermediate CRP results, GPs preferred 3–5-day follow-up to delayed prescribing or other clinical approaches. Patient pressure, diagnostic uncertainty, fear of complications and lack of ABR understanding were the most GP-reported barriers to appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Stewardship interventions considering CRP-POCT and the barriers and facilitators to appropriate prescribing could guide antibiotic prescribing decisions at the point of care.

Antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infection across a national primary care network in 2019.

Respiratory tract infection (RTI) is the leading reason for avoidable antimicrobial use in primary care, yet provider-level feedback on its use is only available in some provinces. The aim of this study was to validate case definitions for RTI across the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) and determine baseline provider-level variability in antimicrobial prescribing in 2019. The RTI case definitions were developed using demographic, diagnostic coding and keywords in electronic medical record. Manual chart abstraction was performed to identify cases of acute otitis media. Remaining RTI definitions were validated using a random sample of 5,164 patients with encounters in 2019. The proportion of patients with an RTI treated with antibiotics was determined by provider, per patient, per episode and per patient encounter. Negative predictive value, positive predictive value and prevalence were as follows: 1.00 (0.99-1.00), 0.99 (0.96-0.99) and 4.14% (4.10-4.19) for common cold; 1.00 (0.99-1.00), 0.94 (0.88-0.98) and 1.09% (1.07-1.12) for acute otitis media; 0.98 (0.96-1.00), 0.93 (0.87-0.97) and 1.2% (1.18-1.22) for acute pharyngitis; 0.99 (0.99-1.00), 0.88 (0.81-0.93) and 1.99% (1.96-2.02) for sinusitis; 0.99 (0.97-0.99), 0.95 (0.89-0.98) and 4.01% (3.97-4.05) for acute bronchitis/asthma. By provider, median (interquartile range [IQR]) proportion treated with antibiotics (per patient) was 6.72 (14.92) for common cold, 64.29 (40.00) for acute otitis media, 20.00 (38.89) for pharyngitis, 54.17 (38.09) for sinusitis, 8.33 (20.00) for acute bronchitis/asthma and 21.10 (20.56) for overall RTI. The CPCSSN can provide national surveillance of antimicrobial prescribing practices for RTI across primary care. Baseline variability underscores the need for provider feedback and quality improvement.

Point-of-care testing, antibiotic prescribing, and prescribing confidence for respiratory tract infections in primary care: a prospective audit in 18 European countries.

BackgroundBetween-country differences have been described in antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infection (RTI) in primary care, but not yet for diagnostic testing procedures and prescribing confidence.AimTo describe between-country differences in RTI management, particularly diagnostic testing and antibiotic prescribing, and investigate which factors relate to antibiotic prescribing and GPs’ prescribing confidence.Design & settingProspective audit in 18 European countries.MethodAn audit of GP-registered patient, clinical, and management characteristics for patients presenting with sore throat and/or lower RTI (n = 4982), and GPs' confidence in their antibiotic prescribing decision. Factors related to antibiotic prescribing and confidence were analysed using multi-level logistic regression.ResultsAntibiotic prescribing proportions varied considerably: <20% in four countries, and >40% in six countries. There was also considerable variation in point-of-care (POC) testing (0% in Croatia, Moldova, and Romania, and >65% in Denmark and Norway, mainly for C-reactive protein [CRP] and group A streptococcal [strep A] infection), and in laboratory or hospital-based testing (<3% in Hungary, the Netherlands, and Spain, and >30% in Croatia, Georgia, Greece, and Moldova, mainly chest X-ray and white blood cell counting). Antibiotic prescribing was related to illness severity, comorbidity, age, fever, and country, but not to having performed a POC test. In nearly 90% of consultations, GPs were confident in their antibiotic prescribing decision.ConclusionDespite high confidence in decisions about antibiotic prescribing, there is considerable variation in the primary care of RTI in European countries, with GPs prescribing antibiotics overall more often than is considered appropriate. POC testing may enhance the quality of antibiotic prescribing decisions if it can safely reverse decisions confidently made on clinical grounds alone to prescribe antibiotics.

Effect of Antibiotics in Preventing Hospitalizations From Respiratory Tract Infections in Children With Down Syndrome

To determine the impact of antibiotic prescription for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) on the subsequent risk of RTI-related hospitalizations in children with Down syndrome (DS).Children aged ≤18 years (defined in groups: 0–1 years; 1–5 years; 5–10 years; and 10–18 years), with DS (as identified by Read and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, codes) were included. Each child with DS in the cohort were frequency matched by general practitioner (GP), sex, birth year (+/− 5 years), and start of follow-up age ≤18 years (follow-up was defined as a period of 28 days from the initial RTI-related GP consultation or until the first RTI-related hospitalization).Information regarding health care use was extrapolated from Clinical Disease Research Using Linked Bespoke Studies and Electronic Health Records, an electronic health records database in the United Kingdom, on the basis of Read and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, codes, to classify types of RTIs (lower respiratory tract infection; upper respiratory tract infection; unclassified) and probable versus possible RTI, identify diagnosis of DS and other comorbidities, and determine admission and discharge dates. Extracted data were reviewed and confirmed by a committee of clinicians and academic professionals. Logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of antibiotic prescriptions on the risk of subsequent RTI-related hospitalization in DS patients with RTI-related GP consultations. In subgroup analyses, the researchers further explored the effect of antibiotics across different age groups and type of RTI.Both cohorts (DS: 992; control: 4874) had similar demographic characteristics for sex and age. There were more White individuals in the group with DS versus in the control group (58.5% vs 41.8%) and more comorbidities in the group with DS. Antibiotic prescriptions after an RTI-related GP consultation did not significantly reduce the risk of the 28-day RTI-related hospitalization for either group, even after adjusting for antibiotic prescription, age group, sex, presence of congenital heart disease, presence of asthma, and number of previous RTI-related hospitalizations and RTI-related GP consultations in the previous 6 months. When adjusted for the same covariates, RTI-related hospitalizations were significantly reduced in DS individuals aged 0–1 years who were prescribed antibiotics for RTI-related concerns (adjusted odds ratio: 0.260; 95% confidence interval: 0.077 to 0.876) but not in other age groups. This protective effect was also not seen by type of RTI or in the control group.Aside from infants aged 0 to 1 years with DS, antibiotic prescriptions did not reduce RTI-related hospitalizations.It appears that children with DS are frequently prescribed antibiotics for viral infections in the United Kingdom. Although antibiotics have not been shown to reduce hospitalizations for RTI in the general pediatric population, in previous studies, researchers did not include children with comorbidities, prompting these authors to specifically examine children with DS. It is unclear how antibiotic prescribing behavior for this special population compares between the United Kingdom and the United States, thus limiting the generalizability of these results. Nevertheless, the authors surmise that nonantibiotic interventions to manage RTIs in medically complex children can be effective, which is consistent with our outpatient stewardship efforts to combat antibiotic misuse and resistance in the United States.

Provider views on rapid diagnostic tests and antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: A mixed methods study.

BackgroundRespiratory tract infections (RTIs) are often inappropriately treated with antibiotics. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed with the aim of improving antibiotic prescribing but uptake remains low. The aim of this study was to examine provider knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding RDT use and their relationship to antibiotic prescribing decisions across multiple clinical departments in an urban safety-net hospital.MethodsWe conducted a mixed methods sequential explanatory study. Providers with prescribing authority (attending physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) who had at least 20 RTI encounters from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Eighty-five providers completed surveys and 16 participated in interviews. We conducted electronic surveys via RedCap from April to July 2019, followed by semi-structured individual interviews from October to December 2019, to ascertain knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to RDT use and antibiotic prescribing.ResultsSurvey findings indicated that providers felt knowledgeable about antibiotic prescribing guidelines. They reported high familiarity with the rapid streptococcus and rapid influenza tests. Familiarity with comprehensive respiratory panel PCR (RPP-respiratory panel PCR) and procalcitonin differed by clinical department. Qualitative interviews identified four main themes: providers trust their clinical judgment more than rapid test results; patient-provider relationships play an important role in prescribing decisions; there is patient demand for antibiotics and providers employ different strategies to address the demand and providers do not believe RDTs are implemented with sufficient education or evidence for clinical practice.ConclusionPrescribers are knowledgeable about prescribing guidelines but often rely on clinical judgement to make final decisions. The utility of RDTs is specific to the type of RDT and the clinical department. Given the low familiarity and clinical utility of RPP and procalcitonin, providers may require additional education and these tests may need to be implemented differently based on clinical department.

Measuring the impacts of the Using Antibiotics Wisely campaign on Canadian community utilization of oral antibiotics for respiratory tract infections: a time-series analysis from 2015 to 2019.

On 1 November 2018, Choosing Wisely Canada launched their Using Antibiotics Wisely primary care campaign, which aimed to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) through educational tools for patients and providers. We explored the impact of this campaign on antibiotic utilization in Canada. We conducted a population-based study in Canada between January 2015 and December 2019. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to study the impact of the Using Antibiotics Wisely campaign on the prescribing rate (prescriptions per 1000 population) of RTI-indicated antibiotics. We analysed prescription rates overall and stratified by age group, drug class and province, in each month over the study period. There was a 1.5% reduction in the annual prescribing rate of RTI-indicated antibiotics over the study period, which was generally consistent across age groups and provinces. Following the 2018 Using Antibiotics Wisely clinician toolkit release, we observed no significant change in RTI-indicated antibiotic prescribing rates nationally (P = 0.13). This was consistent by age group (children, P = 0.91; adults, P = 0.58; and older adults, P = 0.67) and drug class (narrow-spectrum penicillins, P = 0.88; macrolides, P = 0.85; broad-spectrum penicillins, P = 0.60; cephalosporins, P = 0.45; tetracyclines, P = 0.55; and fluoroquinolones, P = 0.98). In our secondary analysis of prescription rates in provinces that self-identified as prioritizing Using Antibiotics Wisely, we observed no significant change following the launch of the campaign. The introduction of the Using Antibiotics Wisely campaign in Canada has not caused a significant change in short-term antibiotic prescribing patterns. Community antibiotic stewardship campaigns that include components beyond education may be more impactful.

Improving Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is common in primary care (PC), particularly for respiratory tract diagnoses (RTDs). However, the optimal approach for improving prescribing remains unknown. We conducted a stepped-wedge study in PC practices within a health system to assess the impact of a provider-targeted intervention on antibiotic prescribing for RTDs. RTDs were grouped into tiers based on appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing: tier 1 (almost always indicated), tier 2 (may be indicated), and tier 3 (rarely indicated). Providers received education on appropriate RTD prescribing followed by monthly peer comparison feedback on antibiotic prescribing for (1) all tiers and (2) tier 3 RTDs. A χ 2 test was used to compare the proportion of visits with antibiotic prescriptions before and during the intervention. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the intervention and antibiotic prescribing. Across 30 PC practices and 185 755 total visits, overall antibiotic prescribing was reduced with the intervention, from 35.2% to 23.0% of visits (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, the intervention was associated with a reduced odds of antibiotic prescription for tiers 2 (odds ratio [OR] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] .52-.62) and 3 (OR 0.57; 95% CI .53-.61) but not for tier 1 (OR 0.98; 95% CI .83-1.16). A provider-focused intervention reduced overall antibiotic prescribing for RTDs without affecting prescribing for infections that likely require antibiotics. Future research should examine the sustainability of such interventions, potential unintended adverse effects on patient health or satisfaction, and provider perceptions and acceptability.

Prescribing antibiotics in adults with respiratory tract infections in Lebanon.

Antibiotic resistance is a global concern that has significant health and economic burden. The inappropriate use of antibiotics is a major cause of antibiotic resistance; this includes both unnecessary and incorrect prescriptions. Most antibiotics are prescribed in primary care, mainly for respiratory tract infections. This study examines the prescribing practices of physicians for respiratory tract infections in ambulatory settings in Lebanon. The study was a cross-sectional review of prescriptions given to a group of employees working in two companies in Greater Beirut in Lebanon (n=469) between September 2017 and March 2018. Prescriptions and related medical reports were reviewed. Data on the type of infection and the employees' demographics were collected. Antibiotic treatment was considered appropriate based on its adherence to international scientific societies' recommendations and clinical guidelines, including those of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. A total of 372 medical reports and prescriptions were reviewed; 88.2% of these prescriptions included antibiotics. The rate of antibiotic treatment was 82.0% for a diagnosis of flu-like symptoms and 94.6% for acute pharyngitis, of which 34.5% included third generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Around 93.7% of patients with acute bronchitis without pneumonia received antibiotics, mostly broad-spectrum ones. A significant association was found between the specialty of the prescribing physicians and some types of upper respiratory tract infections. This study reveals a high prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections in the Lebanese ambulatory practice, contributing to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in the country. It calls for urgent multifaceted interventions to limit unnecessary use and promote antibiotic stewardship.

Examining the use of delayed antimicrobial prescribing.

British Journal of Community NursingVol. 26, No. 6 TreatmentsExamining the use of delayed antimicrobial prescribingAysha MendesAysha MendesE-mail Address: [email protected]Freelance journalist specialising in healthcare, psychology and nursingSearch for more papers by this authorAysha MendesPublished Online:9 Jun 2021https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2021.26.6.308AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antimicrobial stewardship. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/hnbmz5ey (accessed 17 May 2021) Google ScholarOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Stemming the superbug tide. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/4t76s4zr (accessed 17 May 2021) Google ScholarStuart B, Hounkpatin H, Becque T et al. Delayed antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: individual patient data meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021; 373:n808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n808 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 2 June 2021Volume 26Issue 6ISSN (print): 1462-4753ISSN (online): 2052-2215 Metrics History Published online 9 June 2021 Published in print 2 June 2021 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download