Prescribing In Older Adults Research Articles

Applicability of STOPP/START prescribing criteria in integrated Swedish administrative health registries and a Swedish population-based cohort.

The STOPP/START criteria are frequently applied in observational studies to assess potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults. This study aimed to assess the applicability of the three available STOPP/START versions in two distinct data sources. To evaluate the applicability of the three versions of STOPP/START criteria, we used two observational data sources: (i) Integrated Swedish administrative health registries (ISHR) encompassing routinely collected health data and (ii) the population-based Swedish National study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), based on health professional-led clinical assessments. The Anatomical Therapeutic Classification code (ATC) was used to categorise medications. Diseases were categorised using the international classification of diseases version 10 (ICD10). The first STOPP/START version demonstrated an applicability rate of 80% in ISHR and 84% in SNAC-K. The second version demonstrated an applicability of 64% in ISHR and 74% in SNAC-K. The third version showed an applicability of 66% in ISHR and 77% in SNAC-K. Challenges in applicability included broad definitions, vague terminology, and the lack of information on disease severity, symptomatic traits, and stability of certain conditions. The applicability of the STOPP/START criteria in observational studies seems to have decreased in more recent versions of the tool. Population-based studies with comprehensive clinical assessments may offer higher applicability compared to studies based on administrative data. Future versions of the STOPP/START criteria should prioritise clear and unambiguous definitions to improve their applicability in research and promote result generalisability and comparability.

The Effect of COVID-19 Vaccination on Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing in Older Adults: A Self-Controlled Risk-Interval Study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with reduced outpatient antibiotic prescribing among older adults with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We assessed the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on outpatient antibiotic prescribing in the broader population of older adults, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection status. We included adults aged ≥65 years who received their first, second, and/or third COVID-19 vaccine dose from December 2020 to December 2022. We used a self-controlled risk-interval design and included cases who received an antibiotic prescription 2-6 weeks before vaccination (pre-vaccination or control interval) or after vaccination (post-vaccination or risk interval). We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds of being prescribed (1) any antibiotic, (2) a typical "respiratory" infection antibiotic, or (3) a typical "urinary tract" infection antibiotic (negative control) in the post-vaccination interval versus the pre-vaccination interval. We accounted for temporal changes in antibiotic prescribing using background monthly antibiotic prescribing counts. 469 923 vaccine doses met inclusion criteria. The odds of receiving any antibiotic or a respiratory antibiotic prescription were lower in the post-vaccination versus pre-vaccination interval (aOR, .973; 95% CI, .968-.978; aOR, .961; 95% CI, .953-.968, respectively). There was no association between vaccination and urinary antibiotic prescriptions (aOR, .996; 95% CI, .987-1.006). Periods with high (>10%) versus low (<5%) SARS-CoV-2 test positivity demonstrated greater reductions in antibiotic prescribing (aOR, .875; 95% CI, .845-.905; aOR, .996; 95% CI, .989-1.003, respectively). COVID-19 vaccination was associated with reduced outpatient antibiotic prescribing in older adults, especially during periods of high SARS-CoV-2 circulation.

Identifying Features of Effective Epic-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for Addressing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older Adults: A Systematic Review Protocol

Identifying Features of Effective Epic-based Clinical Decision Support Systems for Addressing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older Adults: A Systematic Review Protocol

Antipsychotic Prescribing in Older Adults after In-Hospital Initiation.

In older adults, the use of antipsychotics to treat delirium or the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia is potentially inappropriate and may be associated with adverse effects. Antipsychotics newly initiated in hospital may be inadvertently continued after discharge. In the Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) - Regina area, the frequency and duration of antipsychotic continuation for older adults after initiation during a hospital stay is unknown. To describe potentially inappropriate antipsychotic use in older adults after discharge from hospital, specifically rates of postdischarge antipsychotic therapy after initiation in hospital and continuation up to 180 days after discharge; prescribing regimens used; risk factors associated with continuation; pharmacist involvement; and plans for antipsychotic discontinuation, tapering, and/or follow-up. This retrospective chart review included inpatients 65 years of age or older who were discharged from medicine units at SHA - Regina area hospitals between September 30, 2021, and June 28, 2022. Outpatient dispensing histories were also gathered. Of the 189 patients included in the analysis, 60 (31.7%) had continuation of antipsychotic therapy at discharge. Of these, 48 (80.0%), 33 (55.0%), and 24 (40.0%) had continuation of antipsychotic therapy at 30, 90, and 180 days after discharge, respectively. Of the patients with continuing antipsychotic therapy, 53 (88.3%) were 75 years of age or older, and 9 (15.0%) had documentation of an outpatient antipsychotic follow-up plan. Postdischarge continuation of antipsychotics was similar to that reported in the literature. Patients continued on antipsychotics after discharge were at a greater than 50% risk of continuation at 90 days and were unlikely to have a follow-up plan. Future quality improvement efforts should include standardized prioritization of medication reviews, documentation of indications, and regular reassessment of therapy.

Pneumococcal vaccination and primary care presentations for acute respiratory tract infection and antibiotic prescribing in older adults.

While the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) has demonstrated its role in preventing severe pneumococcal disease, its impact on more non-specific conditions like acute respiratory tract infection (ARI) and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the role of PPV23 in prevention of presentations for ARI and LRTI and related antibiotic prescriptions among older adults in primary care. Using a nationwide general practice dataset, we followed a cohort of regularly attending patients aged ≥65 years from 1 January 2014 until 31 December 2018 for presentations for ARI, LRTI, and related antibiotic prescriptions. Associations between PPV23 receipt and each outcome were assessed using a multiple failures survival model to estimate hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and various health measures. A cohort of 75,264 patients aged ≥65 years (mean 75.4, 56% female) in 2014 was followed. The incidence of presentations for ARI, ARI-related antibiotic prescription, LRTI, and LRTI-related antibiotic prescription was 157.6, 76.0, 49.6, and 24.3 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Recent PPV23 vaccine receipt was associated with a small reduction in ARI presentations (adjusted HR vaccinated vs. unvaccinated 0.96; 95%CI 0.94-0.98; p = 0.002); however, there was no reduction in ARI-related antibiotic prescription, LRTI presentation, nor LRTI-related antibiotic prescription (adjusted HR were 0.99[95%CI 0.96-1.03], 1.04[95%CI 0.99-1.09], 1.07[95%CI 1.00-1.14]). PPV23 vaccination in older adults may result in a small reduction in the incidence of total ARI presentations in primary care. However, the effect is small and residual confounding cannot be excluded.

261 Perceptions of and attitudes towards problematic polypharmacy and prescribing cascades in older adults: a stakeholder analysis

Abstract Background Research to date on appropriate prescribing in older adults has focused on characterising inappropriate prescribing using explicit prescribing indicator tools. Less is known about other causes of problematic polypharmacy such as prescribing cascades. Prescribing cascades occur when a medication is prescribed to treat or to prevent the symptoms of an adverse drug reaction and may be characterised as intentional or unintentional, as well as appropriate or inappropriate. Prescribing cascades, therefore, represent an important and under-researched area of problematic polypharmacy. The aim of this study was to conduct a stakeholder analysis (patients with polypharmacy; carers; General Practitioners [GPs]; hospital doctors; community pharmacists; professional organisation representatives and policymakers) to elicit perceptions of and attitudes towards problematic polypharmacy, with a focus on prescribing cascades. Methods Qualitative one-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants were recruited via a gatekeeper approach. Interview duration ranged from 58 to 80 minutes. Interviews were analysed thematically. Results Thirty-one participants (six patients, two carers, seven GPs, eight community pharmacists, four hospital doctors, two professional organisation representatives, and two policy makers) were interviewed. The challenges of communication at the interface of primary and secondary care were outlined, including the lack of clear ownership of drug monitoring. The community pharmacist and, at times, the patient were relied upon to fill in these gaps in communication. Patients discussed the burden of taking multiple medications. GPs described the importance of ‘mindful prescribing’ to avoid, where possible, unintentional prescribing cascades. The need for further education for health care professionals and patients on prescribing cascades was highlighted, as was the importance of improved collaboration between health care professionals. Conclusion Understanding the perceptions of different stakeholders towards problematic polypharmacy and prescribing cascades is key to the development of effective tools or resources to improve patient care.

The Association of Cognitive Status and Post-Operative Opioid Prescribing in Older Adults.

To examine the differences in opioid prescribing by cognitive status following common elective surgical procedures among Medicare beneficiaries. Older individuals commonly experience changes in cognition with age. Although opioid prescribing is common after surgery, differences in opioid prescribing after surgery by cognitive status are poorly understood. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥65 years participating in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) linked with Medicare claims data who underwent surgeries between January 2007 and November 2016 and had cognitive assessments before the index operation. Cognitive status was defined as normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia. Outcomes assessed were initial perioperative opioid fill rates, refill rates, and high-risk prescriptions fill rates. The total amount of opioids filled during the 30-day postdischarge period was also assessed. Adjusted rates were estimated for patient factors using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Among the 1874 patients included in the analysis, 68% had normal cognition, 21.3% had MCI, and 10.7% had dementia. Patients with normal cognition (58.1%) and MCI (54.5%) had higher initial preoperative fill rates than patients with dementia (33.5%) (P < 0.001). Overall, patients with dementia had similar opioid refill rates (21%) to patients with normal cognition (24.1%) and MCI (26.5%) (P = 0.322). Although prior opioid exposure did not differ by cognitive status (P = 0.171), among patients with high chronic preoperative use, those with dementia had lower adjusted prescription sizes filled within 30 days following discharge (281 OME) than patients with normal cognition (2147 OME) and MCI (774 OME) (P < 0.001; P = 0.009 respectively). Among opioid-naive patients, patients with dementia also filled smaller prescription sizes (97 OME) compared to patients with normal cognition (205 OME) and patients with MCI (173 OME) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). Patients with dementia are less likely to receive postoperative prescriptions, less likely to refill prescriptions, and receive prescriptions of smaller sizes compared to patients with normal cognition or MCI. A cognitive assessment is an additional tool surgeons can use to determine a patient's individualized postoperative pain control plan.

Using multiple approaches to develop a physician-pharmacist collaborative care intervention to facilitate appropriate prescribing for older adults with multimorbidity

Background and objectivesThis article discusses the development process of an intervention to facilitate appropriate prescribing for older adults with multimorbidity at geriatric medicine outpatient clinics. Both effectiveness and implementability were key aims, which were achieved by a systematic combination of different approaches guided by published guidance. MethodsVarious frameworks and tools were used to guide the intervention development. They include The Medical Research Council Framework for complex health interventions as the overarching framework, supplemented by the Framework of Actions for Intervention Development and a taxonomy of intervention development approaches. ResultsA combination of theory and evidence-based-, implementation-based and partnership approaches were used to develop the intervention. The Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework were used for intervention design. Three scoping reviews and two modified Delphi studies were conducted to build an evidence base on prescribing-related barriers and existing interventions. The findings were synthesised, assessed for implementability, and culminated in a co-creation exercise with physicians and pharmacists. The final intervention aims to facilitate collaboration between physicians and pharmacists and to improve communication and documentation of prescribing decisions. ConclusionsMultiple approaches may be required when developing interventions that are effective and implementable. The study team's experiences in using published guidance, integrating different approaches, and co-creating the intervention with healthcare professionals provide a useful case study with lessons and insights for developers of complex interventions. Furthermore, systematic reporting of such research-based efforts would contribute to advancement of intervention development in healthcare and reducing research waste.

Optimising prescribing in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy in primary care (OPTICA): cluster randomised clinical trial

ObjectiveTo study the effects of a primary care medication review intervention centred around an electronic clinical decision support system (eCDSS) on appropriateness of medication and the number of prescribing omissions...

Interprofessional learner perceptions of a brief educational intervention about opioid prescribing for older adults.

Interprofessional learner perceptions of a brief educational intervention about opioid prescribing for older adults.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Is Associated With Reduced Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing in Older Adults With Confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2: A Population-Wide Cohort Study.

Antibiotics are frequently prescribed unnecessarily in outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We sought to evaluate factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in outpatients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We performed a population-wide cohort study of outpatients aged ≥66 years with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 in Ontario, Canada. We determined rates of antibiotic prescribing within 1 week before (prediagnosis) and 1 week after (postdiagnosis) reporting of the positive SARS-CoV-2 result, compared to a self-controlled period (baseline). We evaluated predictors of prescribing, including a primary-series COVID-19 vaccination, in univariate and multivariable analyses. We identified 13 529 eligible nursing home residents and 50 885 eligible community-dwelling adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the nursing home and community residents, 3020 (22%) and 6372 (13%), respectively, received at least 1 antibiotic prescription within 1 week of a SARS-CoV-2 positive result. Antibiotic prescribing in nursing home and community residents occurred, respectively, at 15.0 and 10.5 prescriptions per 1000 person-days prediagnosis and 20.9 and 9.8 per 1000 person-days postdiagnosis, higher than the baseline rates of 4.3 and 2.5 prescriptions per 1000 person-days. COVID-19 vaccination was associated with reduced prescribing in nursing home and community residents, with adjusted postdiagnosis incidence rate ratios (95% confidence interval) of 0.7 (0.4-1) and 0.3 (0.3-0.4), respectively. Antibiotic prescribing was high and with little or no decline following SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis but was reduced in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals, highlighting the importance of vaccination and antibiotic stewardship in older adults with COVID-19.

Development and validation of PolyScan, an information technology triage tool for older adults with polypharmacy: a healthcare informatics study.

Introduction Polypharmacy is associated with potentially inappropriate medicine prescribing and avoidable medicine-related harm. Polypharmacy should not be perceived as inherently harmful. Instead, priority should be placed on reducing inappropriate prescribing. Aim The study aimed to develop and validate PolyScan, a primary care information technology tool, to triage older adults with polypharmacy who are prescribed potentially inappropriate medicines. Methods Twenty-one indicators from a New Zealand criteria of potentially inappropriate medicines to correct for older adults with polypharmacy were developed into a set of implementable definitions. The definitions were applied as algorithmic logic statements used to interrogate hospital and emergency department records and pharmaceutical collection data to classify whether each indicator was present at an individual patient level, and then triage individuals based on the number of indicators met. Validity was evaluated by comparing PolyScan's accuracy against a manual review of healthcare records for 300 older adults. Results PolyScan was successfully implemented as a tool that can be used to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults with polypharmacy at different levels of aggregation. The tool has utility for individual practitioners delivering patient care, primary care organisations undertaking quality improvement programmes, and policymakers considering system-level interventions for medicines-related safety. During the validity assessment, PolyScan identified nine individuals (3%) with polypharmacy and indicators of potentially inappropriate medicine. Five unique indicators were detected. PolyScan achieved 100% sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Discussion PolyScan can support clinicians, clinics, and policymakers with allocation of resources, rational medicine campaigns, and identifying individuals prescribed potentially inappropriate medicines for review.

Author Correction: Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults in Central and Eastern Europe: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

Author Correction: Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults in Central and Eastern Europe: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

Rural-urban prescribing patterns by primary care and behavioral health providers in older adults with serious mental illness

BackgroundOlder adults with serious mental illness (SMI) often have multiple comorbidities and complex medication schedules. Shortages of behavioral health specialists (BHSs), especially in rural areas, frequently make primary care providers (PCPs) the only clinician managing this complex population. The aim of this study was to describe rural/urban psychiatric medication prescribing in older adults with SMI by PCPs and BHSs, and by clinician type.MethodsThis retrospective descriptive analysis used 2018 Medicare data to identify individuals with a bipolar, major depression, schizophrenia, or psychosis diagnosis and examined medication claims for antianxiety, antidepressants, antipsychotics, hypnotics, and anticonvulsants. Descriptive statistics summarized percentage of medications provided by PCPs and BHSs stratified by rural and urban areas and by drug class. Additional analyses compared psychiatric prescribing patterns by physicians, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), and physician assistants (PAs).ResultsIn urban areas, PCPs prescribed at least 50% of each psychiatric medication class, except antipsychotics, which was 45.2%. BHSs prescribed 40.7% of antipsychotics and less than 25% of all other classes. In rural areas, percentages of psychiatric medications from PCPs were over 70% for each medication class, except antipsychotics, which was 60.1%. Primary care physicians provided most psychiatric medications, between 36%-57% in urban areas and 47%-65% in rural areas. Primary care APRNs provided up to 13% of prescriptions in rural areas, which was more than the amount prescribed by BHS physicians, expect for antipsychotics. Psychiatric mental health APRNs provided up to 7.5% of antipsychotics in rural areas, but their prescribing contribution among other classes ranged between 1.1%-3.6%. PAs provided 2.5%-3.4% of medications in urban areas and this increased to 3.9%-5.1% in rural areas.ConclusionsResults highlight the extensive roles of PCPs, including APRNs, in managing psychiatric medications for older adults with SMI.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults with cancer receiving specialist palliative care: a retrospective observational study.

Older adults (≥ 65years) with cancer receiving palliative care often have other health conditions requiring multiple medications. To describe and assess the appropriateness of prescribing for older adults with cancer in the last seven days of life in an inpatient palliative care setting. Retrospective observational study of medical records for 180 patients (60.6% male; median age: 74years; range 65-94years) over a two-year period. Medication appropriateness was assessed using: STOPPFrail, OncPal deprescribing guideline and criteria for identifying Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in older adults with Cancer receiving Palliative Care (PIP-CPC). 94.5% of patients had at least one other health condition (median 3, IQR 2-5). The median number of medications increased from five (IQR 3-7) seven days before death, to 11 medications on the day of death (IQR 9-15). The prevalence of PIP varied depending on the tool used: STOPPFrail (version 1: 17.2%, version 2: 19.4%), OncPal (12.8%), PIP-CPC (30%). However, the retrospective nature of the study limited the applicability of the tools. Increasing number of medications had a statistically significant effect on risk of PIP across all tools (STOPPFrail (version 1: 1.29 (1.13-1.37), version 2: 1.30 (1.16-1.48)); OncPal 1.13 (1.01-1.27); PIP-CPC 0.70 (0.61-0.82)). This study found that the number of medications prescribed to older adults with cancer increased as time to death approached, and the prevalence of PIP varied with the application of different tools. The study also highlights the difficulties of examining PIP in this patient cohort.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults in Central and Eastern Europe: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

We aimed to systematically review the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older adults in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in all care settings. We searched Embase and MEDLINE (up to June 2019) and checked the reference lists of the included studies and relevant reviews. Eligible studies used validated explicit or implicit tools to assess the PIP prevalence in older adults in CEE. All study designs were considered, except case‒control studies and case series. We assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was inappropriate due to heterogeneity in the outcome measurements. Therefore, we used the synthesis without meta-analysis approach—summarizing effect estimates method. This review included twenty-seven studies with 139,693 participants. Most studies were cross-sectional and conducted in high-income countries. The data synthesis across 26 studies revealed the PIP prevalence: the median was 34.6%, the interquartile range was 25.9–63.2%, and the range was 6.5–95.8%. The certainty of this evidence was very low due to the risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. These findings show that PIP is a prevalent issue in the CEE region. Further well-designed studies conducted across countries are needed to strengthen the existing evidence and increase the generalizability of findings.

Healthcare costs of adverse drug reactions and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults: a population-based study

ObjectivesTo describe the distribution of costs based on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and adverse drug reaction (ADR) status in terms of total direct costs and costs caused by ADRs, among...

Establishing the worth of deprescribing inappropriate medications: are we there yet?

Establishing the worth of deprescribing inappropriate medications: are we there yet?

Abstract 12: Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing For Older Adults Newly Diagnosed With Atrial Fibrillation During Hospitalization

Background: Oral anticoagulants are indicated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at elevated thromboembolic risk. AF is often diagnosed during hospitalization, yet little is known about rates of anticoagulant initiation in this setting. Methods: We examined a 20% national sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries enrolled in Part D, aged &gt; 65 years, who were hospitalized in 2016, and who received a new diagnosis of AF. The primary outcome was anticoagulant claim within 7 days of discharge home. We used multivariable logistic regression and post-estimation predicted probabilities to identify predictors of discharge with an anticoagulant, hypothesizing that thromboembolic risk, bleeding risk, and frailty would independently influence anticoagulant initiation. Results: Among 31,889 patients diagnosed with AF while hospitalized (mean age, 78; 52% female; 84% white; 95% CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2; 84% HAS-BLED ≥2; 37% frail), one-quarter initiated an anticoagulant following discharge. In multivariable models, rates of anticoagulant initiation varied by primary reason for hospitalization, with the highest predicted probability of initiation among those with a primary diagnosis of AF (46.3%; 95% CI 45.1-47.5), followed by cardiac surgery (42.8%; 39.6-46.0), other cardiovascular conditions (25.1%; 24.3-26.0), non-cardiac diagnoses (18.6%; 17.3-19.9), and bleeds (3.6%; 2.3-5.0). Higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was associated with a small increase in anticoagulant initiation (predicted probability 19.8% [15.4-24.2] for CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc &lt;2 and 25.2% [24.7-25.7] for ≥4). Higher HAS-BLED score was associated with a small decrease (25.7% [24.6-26.8] for HAS-BLED &lt;2 and 23.4% [22.7-24.1] for ≥3). Increased frailty was associated with decreased likelihood of anticoagulant initiation, with robust and moderately-severely frail patients having predicted probabilities of 25.0% (23.3-26.6) and 17.6% (15.9-19.2) respectively. Discussion: Anticoagulant initiation is uncommon among older adults newly diagnosed with AF during hospitalization, even among those hospitalized primarily for AF and those with high thromboembolic risk. Providers should carefully weigh risks and benefits of anticoagulants with all inpatients found to have AF.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults with cancer receiving specialist palliative care: a retrospective analysis of medical records

Abstract Introduction Older adults (≥65 years) with cancer often have existing comorbidities requiring multiple medications (1). Optimising medications in palliative care requires clinicians to consider whether each medication is appropriate in relation to patients’ context, treatment goals and life expectancy. The reported prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in general palliative care settings ranges from 15 to 92% (2). However, the application of tools that are specific to populations with limited life expectancy has been lacking in previous research (2). Aim To describe and assess the appropriateness of prescribing practices for older adults with cancer in the last seven days of life in an inpatient palliative care setting. Methods This was a retrospective observational study of medical records for older adults (≥65 years) with cancer who received inpatient specialist palliative care services in a hospice setting in Ireland in the final week of life over a two-year period. Data were extracted relating to patient demographics and prescribed medications using an electronic pro-forma. Medication appropriateness was assessed using the following tools: STOPPFrail (Version 2; consists of 25 deprescribing criteria for use in frail older adults with limited life expectancy), the OncPal deprescribing guideline (consists of eight medication classes for deprescribing in palliative patients with cancer) and criteria for identifying Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in older adults with Cancer receiving Palliative Care (PIP-CPC; consists of 24 criteria for identifying potentially inappropriate prescribing of medications for symptomatic relief in older adults with cancer). These tools were retrospectively applied to the extracted data by the lead researcher. Data were analysed (Stata, Version 15) using descriptive statistics, including means (standard deviation, SD), medians (inter-quartile range, IQR) and frequency and percentage. Results One hundred and eighty older adults with cancer were included in this study. The majority were male (60.6%) and the median age was 74 years (range 65-94 years). The most common primary cancer diagnoses affected the digestive organs (31.7%), respiratory and intrathoracic organs (18.8%) and male genital organs (10%). Almost all patients (94.5%) had at least one comorbid condition (median 3, IQR 2-5). The median number of medications increased from five (IQR 3-7) seven days before death, to 11 medications on the day of death (IQR 9-15). The most prevalent drug classes were opioids, antipsychotics, antispasmodics, benzodiazepines and paracetamol. More than half of patients had at least one PIP identified by the tools (n=97, 53.9%). The identified prevalence of PIP per tool in the patient cohort was: STOPPFrail V2 (20.6%), OncPal (12.7%), PIP-CPC (32.8%). However, several criteria could not be applied due to the absence of clinical information. Conclusion This study highlights that the number of medications prescribed to older adults with cancer increased as time to death approached, and that more than half of patients received at least one medication which was considered potentially inappropriate during their last week of life. The absence of electronic prescribing records and retrospective nature of the study limited the applicability of some criteria. Interventions are needed to optimise medication prescribing and use in palliative care settings. References (1) Sharma M, Loh KP, Nightingale G, Mohile SG, Holmes HM. Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use in geriatric oncology. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016;7(5):346-53. (2) Cadogan CA, Murphy M, Boland M, Bennett K, McLean S, Hughes C. Prescribing practices, patterns, and potential harms in patients receiving palliative care: A systematic scoping review. Expl Res Clinic Soc Pharm. 2021;1(3):100050.