Correction Of Presbyopia Research Articles

Correcting near vision impairment and women’s empowerment: a before-after mixed-methods study among older Zanzibari craftswomen

ObjectiveTo understand if presbyopia correction could empower older craftswomen entrepreneurs living in Zanzibar.DesignMixed-method, before-after intervention study.SettingUnguja and Pemba islands, Zanzibar.Participants209 craftswomen (weaving, tailoring and sewing, pottery and producing oil and...

Clinical Comparison of a Small-Aperture Intraocular Lens Versus a Monofocal Control.

To evaluate range of visual acuity, visual quality, and safety of the IC-8 small-aperture (SA) intraocular lens (IOL) (Apthera; Bausch & Lomb, Inc) in patients with cataract. This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, non-randomized, examiner-masked, 12-month clinical study conducted at 21 sites in the United States. Included patients (N = 453) received either the SA IOL (targeted to -0.75 diopters) in one eye and a monofocal or monofocal toric IOL (targeted to plano) in the fellow eye (SA IOL group, n = 343) or bilateral monofocal/monofocal toric IOLs (control group, n = 110). At 6 months, the SA IOL group achieved superior binocular uncorrected intermediate and near visual acuity (P < .0001) and equivalent binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity versus the control group. In SA IOL eyes, 99.1% achieved monocular corrected distance visual acuity of 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or better. The SA IOL and control groups had comparable binocular photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivities at 6 months both with and without glare. The SA IOL group reported few visual symptoms overall, although at higher rates than in the control group. The SA IOL group exhibited improved intermediate and near vision, comparable distance vision and binocular contrast sensitivities, and few visual symptoms or adverse events versus the bilateral monofocal/monofocal toric IOL group, suggesting that the SA IOL is an effective option for presbyopia correction at the time of cataract surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(11):e824-e835.].

Evaluation of Long-term Rotational Stability and Functional Performance of Two Toric Multifocal IOL Models Beyond 5 Years.

To assess visual outcomes and stability of lens alignment more than 3 years after implanting either the AT Lisa Tri Toric (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) intraocular lens (IOL). Patients who had received either the AT Lisa Tri Toric or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOL were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 5.4 years for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 7.9 years for the Acrysof IQ Restor group. The examinations covered included: subjective refraction, monocular and binocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity at far (4 m), intermediate (75 cm), and near (40 cm) distances, binocular best-corrected defocus curve analysis (4 m), contrast sensitivity evaluation, assessment of IOL axial position, and presence of positive dysphotopsia. A total of 42 eyes were evaluated. Both groups exhibited good long-term lens axial stability. The AT Lisa Tri Toric group had a mean misalignment of 4.8 ± 3.2° from the preoperatively determined axis, whereas the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group had an average misalignment of 5.4 ± 4.5° (no statistically significant difference, P = .578). Mean achieved spherical equivalent was -0.19 ± 0.36 diopters (D) for the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 0.15 ± 0.39 D for the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. In the AT Lisa Tri Toric group, 18 eyes (72%) achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/25 Snellen) or better, compared to 15 eyes (88%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group. Overall, 21 eyes (84%) in the AT Lisa Tri Toric group and 14 eyes (83%) in the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric group achieved a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction between -0.50 and +0.50 D. Both the AT Lisa Tri Toric and the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOLs showed good long-term stability and functional outcomes. They proved to be effective options for restoring vision at far, intermediate, and near distances, providing a viable solution for presbyopia correction even several years after implantation. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(11):e845-e853.].

Intraocular correction of presbyopia in cataract surgery

Intraocular correction of presbyopia in cataract surgery

Dysfunctional lens syndrome: a literature review

Introduction. The term “Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome” (DLS) refers to age-related changes in the lens, including early cataracts and presbyopia, that do not significantly reduce visual acuity. This syndrome is characterized by a decrease in accommodative amplitude, an increase in light scattering, and a reduction in contrast sensitivity. With rising life expectancy, the prevalence of DLS is increasing, necessitating a more in-depth study of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the syndrome and the refinement of its diagnostic criteria to establish standards for treatment correction. Aim: to summarize information on the pathogenesis of DLS, the potential for staging the syndrome using objective examination methods, and to provide treatment recommendations. Materials and methods. A bibliographic study of scientific publications was conducted using the Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and Cyberleninka databases. Literature sources were searched using the following keywords: dysfunctional lens syndrome (DLS), presbyopia correction, cataract, age-related lens changes. A total of 32 publications, primarily from the last 10 years, were included in the study from more than 100 viewed sources. Results. The DLS encompasses a wide range of conditions, from early stages characterized by a loss of accommodative amplitude and minor refractive anomalies to later stages involving a decrease in visual acuity and quality due to increased light scattering and aberrations. Currently, the evaluation of age-related lens changes involves assessing visual acuity and determining the degree of lens opacification using slit-lamp examination. Additionally, objective instrumental methods, such as optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging, can be used to assess the degree of lens opacification. Various methods are employed for the correction and treatment of DLS, ranging from glasses and contact lenses to surgical interventions, such as lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Research is also ongoing into drugs aimed at slowing the progression of lens changes. Conclusion. The term “Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome” is currently used to describe early cataracts and presbyopia, where the reduction in visual acuity is still minor, but patients experience visual complaints due to age-related lens changes. Further research is necessary to develop and standardize diagnostic criteria and to evaluate the effectiveness of new treatment methods and interventions in order to create the most effective and adequate approach to correcting DLS and alleviating the associated visual complaints.

Multifocal contact lenses. Easy fitting algorithm and new possibilities in presbyopia correction with TOTAL30 Multifocal

Multifocal soft contact lenses are the fastest growth segment in contact lenses. While presbyopic patients demonstrate an increasing interest in contact lenses, not all practitioners actively integrate multifocal lenses into their practices. Some of the reasons include the perception that multifocal fitting is time-consuming and chances of successful adaptation of “ageing” patients are low. The purpose of this publication is to provide an overview of the latest multifocal contact lens, essential fitting steps and instruments for quick and effective multifocal lens fitting.

Correction of Presbyopia by Monocular Bi-Aspheric Ablation Profile.

The study aims to evaluate visual acuity and objective visual quality before and after the monocular bi-aspheric ablation profile for correction of presbyopia surgery. This prospective self-control study included 20 cases and 38 eyes of patients who underwent monocular bi-aspheric ablation profile correction of myopia with presbyopia at the Eye Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2023 to January 2024. These patients were selected for observation, and each patient's preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical aberration (SA) (within 6 mm), horizontal and vertical coma (within 6 mm), and corneal aspheric index (Q-value) (within 6 mm) were evaluated. Statistical data analysis was performed at different time points before and after the operation. There were statistically significant differences in UDVA between dominant and non-dominant eyes before and after surgery (Z = -3.784, p < 0.001; Z = -3.817, p < 0.001). Post-operatively, 90% of the non-dominant eyes achieved UNVA of J1 and above, and 95% of the bilateral eyes achieved UNVA of J1 and above. Significant differences were found in the SA of the dominant eyes, which showed a positive increase (Z= -3.784, p < 0.001); however, compared with the dominant eye, the SA of the non-dominant eye was negatively increased, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). There was a significant difference in the vertical coma of the dominant eye before and after the operation, but there was no significant difference in non-dominant eyes. There was no significant difference in the change of binocular horizontal coma before and after the operation. There were significant changes in the Q value of both eyes before and after the operation (Z = -3.923, p < 0.001; Z = -3.51, p < 0.001). After the monocular bi-aspheric ablation profile, the cornea of the non-dominant eye showed a prolate shape, negative SA increased, and the UDVA and UNVA improved after the operation.

Polypseudophakia: from "Piggyback" to supplementary sulcus-fixated IOLs.

Polypseudophakia, the concept of using a second intraocular lens (IOL) to supplement an IOL that has already been placed in the capsular bag, was first used as a corrective measure where the power requirement was higher than that of available single IOLs. Subsequently, the technique was modified to compensate for post-operative residual refractive errors. In these early cases, an IOL designed for the capsular bag would be implanted in the sulcus.Although these approaches were less than ideal, alternative means of correcting residual refractive errors were not without their limitations: IOL exchange can be traumatic to the eye and is not easily carried out once fibrosis has occurred, while corneal refractive surgical techniques are not suitable for all patients.Piggyback implantation was the term first coined to describe the use of two IOLs, placed together in the capsular bag. The term was later extended to include the procedure where an IOL designed for the capsular bag was placed in the sulcus. Unfortunately, the term piggyback has persisted even though these two approaches have been largely discredited.Intraocular lenses are now available which have been specifically designed for placement in the ciliary sulcus. As these newer IOLs avoid the many unacceptable complications brought about by both types of earlier piggyback implantation, it is time to employ a new terminology, such as supplementary IOL or secondary enhancement to distinguish between the placement of an unsuitable capsular bag IOL in the sulcus and the implantation of an IOL specifically designed for ciliary sulcus implantation.In addition to minimising possible complications, supplementary IOLs designed for the sulcus have expanded the options available to the ophthalmic surgeon. With these new IOLs it is possible to correct presbyopia and residual astigmatism, and to provide temporary correction of refractive errors in growing, or unstable, eyes. This article aims to review the literature available on supplementary IOL implantation in the ciliary sulcus and to summarise the evidence for the efficacy and safety of this intervention. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Polypseudophakia has been used for over 30 years to correct hyperopia or residual refractive error, but early techniques were associated with significant complications. What is new The development of specially designed sulcus-fixated supplementary IOLs significantly reduces the risks associated with these procedures, and has also opened up new opportunities in patient care. The reversibility of the procedure allows patients to experience multifocality, and to provide temporary and adjustable correction in unstable or growing eyes. The terms "secondary enhancement" or "DUET" to describe supplementary IOL implantation are preferential to "piggyback".

Jacobi-Fourier phase masks as ophthalmic elements to correct presbyopia.

Investigations into the correction of presbyopia have considered lens design, clinical implications and the development of objective metrics such as the visual Strehl ratio. This study investigated the Jacobi-Fourier phase mask as an ophthalmic element in the correction of presbyopia. The goal was to develop a contact or intraocular lens whose performance was largely insensitive to changes in pupil diameter. Numerical simulations based on Fourier optics were performed to evaluate three different Jacobi-Fourier polynomials, with the aim of providing a range of clear vision (1 Dioptre (D)). Performance was evaluated for three pupil sizes (6, 4 and 2 mm), while polychromatic images were simulated using three different wavelengths (656.3, 587.6 and 486.1 nm). The Neural Transfer function was included in the simulation. To validate the method and results, we used the Visual Strehl combined objective metric (VSCombined) currently used in visual optics. This metric gives more weight to the phase transfer function and is more suitable for non-symmetrical phase functions. Numerical validation showed the suitability of the Jacobi-Fourier phase masks for extending the range of clear vision of presbyopic eyes, providing a visual acuity of at least 0.10 logMAR (6/7.5 Snellen) at all distances between 1 and 6 m. The results show a range of clear vision of 1D was not affected by changes in pupil size, an increase in retinal image contrast accompanied by image artefact reduction by increasing the radial order of the Jacobi-Fourier phase mask and a reduction of wavelength dependence of the retinal images. These results are supported by simulated images and the objective criterion VSCombined. The use of Jacobi-Fourier phase masks as ophthalmic elements for presbyopic correction show promising results, with a good range of clear vision andreduced dependence on pupil size and chromatic aberration.

Stereopsis Following Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Narrative Review.

Recent advancements in cataract surgery have broadened its scope from mere vision restoration to include correction of refractive errors and presbyopia. This evolution has introduced multifocal and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs), allowing enhanced vision across multiple distances. However, the influence of these advanced IOLs on stereopsis remains controversial. Factors influencing stereopsis after surgery include visual acuity, interocular differences, residual astigmatism, and the type of IOL, etc. Binocular vision integration and neuroadaptation further affect stereopsis, especially in cases of presbyopia-correcting IOLs. It is widely acknowledged that bilateral implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs yield superior stereopsis compared to unilateral implantation. However, there remains no consensus on whether binocular implantation of multifocal or monofocal IOLs provides superior stereopsis. Most studies suggest no significant difference in stereopsis between these two types of implants. Among different types of multifocal IOLs, refractive multifocal IOLs may offer better stereopsis than diffractive multifocal IOLs when implanted bilaterally. Emerging EDOF and hybrid multifocal-EDOF IOLs also demonstrate promising postoperative stereopsis. Additionally, a mix-and-match strategy with different types of IOLs implanted in each eye may result in interocular differences in visual acuity at certain distances, potentially affecting stereopsis. Nevertheless, with appropriate selection, most patients can achieve satisfactory postoperative stereopsis. This review synthesizes current literature on the effects of presbyopia-correcting IOLs on postoperative stereopsis recovery following cataract surgery. Studies on stereopsis outcomes with different IOLs have yielded mixed results, urging further investigation for optimized surgical strategies and patient outcomes.

Spoilt for choice: intraocular lenses for correction of presbyopia : Classification, optical properties, clinical results

Spoilt for choice: intraocular lenses for correction of presbyopia : Classification, optical properties, clinical results

Laser refractive correction of presbyopia.

Presbyopia is an inevitable and progressive loss of the eye's ability to focus on nearby objects due to aging, which affects everyone regardless of their refractive error. Uncorrected presbyopia is a significant burden worldwide and affects the quality of life. Conservative options include spectacle correction, contact lenses, and pharmacologic agents. Spectacles are commonly used to correct vision, but have certain drawbacks such as peripheral blur and impaired depth perception. These limitations have been associated with an increased risk of accidental falls. Several surgical options are available to address these issues, including cornea-based, lens-based, or scleral procedures. These procedures involve modifying the cornea's optics, replacing the crystalline lens, or attempting to restore accommodation. Each of the options has its benefits and limitations. One of the most common surgical methods of presbyopic correction that has recently become popular is presbyopic Laser assisted In situ keratomileusis (LASIK) due to its improved safety and efficacy. This article is a review of all the currently available data and studies regarding the various methods of correction of presbyopia, with an emphasis on the principles and outcomes of the corneal laser refractive procedures for presbyopia correction, such as PresbyLASIK, Supracor, PRESBYOND laser blended vision, and Custom Q.

Proactively addressing the challenges and issues in presbyopia correction surgery

With the population aging, the increasing number of presbyopia patients and the growing demand for correction have become pressing visual challenges. In recent years, presbyopia correction surgery has been a clinical focus, with ongoing innovations in surgical mechanisms and methods, but significant issues remain unresolved. This article explores the advancements and challenges in various presbyopia correction procedures, identifies key future trends and directions, and aims to provide guidance for improving the safety, efficacy, practicality, and longevity of these procedures in line with natural aging processes.

Whether laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology could treat presbyopia

Presbyopia refers to a phenomenon in which the ability of the eye to accommodate is insufficient to meet the daily demand for proximity due to age. In modern society, more and more patients over 40 years old want to solve visual problems caused by presbyopia and refractive errors, which poses new challenges for clinical laser corneal refractive surgery, and a variety of combined presbyopia correction technologies and programs have emerged. However, whether laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology could treat presbyopia deserves clinical attention. Based on the mechanism of laser corneal refractive surgery and various presbyopia correction techniques, this article deeply analyzes the purpose and effect of laser corneal refractive surgery combined with presbyopia correction technology. It is proposed that this surgical treatment could only play a role in correcting presbyopia at present and should be performed accordingly.

Perception and awareness of the public about presbyopia and its corrective approaches in Saudi Arabia: a population-based survey

BackgroundThis study investigated patients’ awareness of presbyopia and its management approaches and their preferred methods for near vision correction.MethodsIn Saudi Arabia, 785 participants (aged between 35 and 60 years) completed a structured survey online, consisting of hard copies and direct interviews. The survey consisted of twenty-eight items divided into three parts. It was designed to record participants’ awareness of and preferences for presbyopia and its refractive corrections. Nonparametric tests and descriptive analyses were conducted to analyse participants’ responses.ResultApproximately half of the participants had difficulty with near vision activities, such as reading newspapers or using mobile phones. Among all the participants, 76% were not aware of presbyopia. The prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia was 48% of the 785. The majority (82%) felt that spectacles were acceptable for correction of presbyopia. Most reported that they did not experience social stigma when using reading spectacles (87% of participants). When asked if they were aware of management approaches other than spectacles, 72% responded with not at all. Most participants had no earlier knowledge of the use of multifocal contact lenses or eye drops for presbyopia correction (67% and 82%, respectively). In the present study, some tendencies to use corrective approaches to presbyopia other than spectacles were noted. Finally, participants’ age, sex, region, education, and income had a statistically significant impact on essential parts of their responses (p < 0.05).ConclusionPresbyopia is a highly prevalent age-related ocular disorder, and a significant percentage of cases are uncorrected due to a lack of awareness or reluctance to wear spectacles. More efficient health education about presbyopia and its corrective alternatives is urgently needed.

Complex optical systems for individualized correction of presbyopia

Amultitude of available intraocular lens (IOL) models enable apersonalized approach to presbyopia correction in order to meet each patient's needs. This review article discusses more complex approaches which can be useful in selected cases. The concept of reversible trifocality enables correction of presbyopia using asupplementary intraocular lens (IOL), which can be removed if necessary (e.g., intolerance to multifocal optics). The use of capsulotomy-fixated IOLs enables high precision for positioning of the lens and better stability compared to conventional capsular bag-fixated IOLs, which can be particularly advantageous in multifocal optics. The mix and match concept enables acombination of different IOLs with various optical principles to achieve the desired binocular effect. Binocular IOL systems, which consist of two complementary IOLs, can be seen as afurther development of the mix and match concept. Knowledge of the available options and their application can further improve correction of presbyopia.

Overview of intraocular lenses with optics for correcting presbyopia

In recent years intraocular lenses (IOLs) for correcting presbyopia have been significantly improved and diversified. There are currently many different IOL models based on awide variety of optical designs. The wide variety of available IOL solutions to correct presbyopia can be challenging for surgeons and patients. In everyday practice, the question is which IOL is best for which patient. This overview describes and categorizes the currently available implants. The respective optical properties are analyzed and clinical study results are discussed, in particular those evaluating visual performance and the occurrence of photic phenomena. Monofocal-plus IOLs provide improved intermediate visual acuity with optimal distant visual acuity and minimal photic phenomena. Extended depth of field (EDoF) IOLs extend the depth of field through different optical principles and provide good distant and intermediate visual acuity. Trifocal lenses enable the greatest independence from spectacles at the price of ahigher probability of dysphotopsia. The selection of the most suitable IOL for correction of presbyopia requires abalance between the patient's visual needs and possible side effects. An adequate knowledge of the currently available implants allows a patient-oriented selection of IOLs.

A simultaneous post-LASIK sequential bilateral implantation of multifocal IOLs aimed at refraction correction. A clinical case

The article presents a clinical example of intraocular presbyopia correction in a patient who previously underwent laser vision correction by LASIK for mild myopia. Before the surgery, the distance VA mono- and binocular was 1.0, ADD for reading distance 40 cm +2.0 D, objective refraction sph +0.5 D cyl -0.25 D ax 980, left eye sph +0.75 D cyl -0.25 D ax 660. The patient was given a simultaneous bilateral refractive lens exchange with an implantation of a trifocal aspheric intraocular lens in the right eye and a trifocal toric aspheric intraocular lens in the left eye. We used the following IOL calculation formulas: ASCRS mean IOL power, Shammas formula, Barrett true K formula, Masket formula, Modified Masket formula, Haigis-L formula. 1 week postop: UDVA OU = 1.0, UNVA 40 cm = 1.0, UVA 70 cm = 0.7. The objective refraction OD was sph +0.0, D cyl -0.75 D ax 163, OS sph +0.25 D, cyl -0.0 D. The compliance with the modified algorithms of pre-and intraoperative behavior of the operating team, thorough preparation of the patient, careful calculation of the IOL allowed us to obtain the predictive refractive result with a high level of visual satisfaction and absence of undesirable postoperative phenomena. The patient underwent the examination with Salzburg reading desk before and after the surgery, to confirm the excellent functional results of the treatment. Despite the fact that simultaneous same day IOL implantation in both eyes, especially in eyes with previously operated corneas, is still disputable, the above case confirms that with modern equipment, precise multi formula calculation, and ample experience help achieve excellent functional and refractive results.

Clinical and Visual Outcomes of Four Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses.

To compare objective and subjective outcomes of the multifocal intraocular lenses ReSTOR SN6AD1 and Tecnis ZKB00, extended depth of focus IOL Symfony ZXR00, and trifocal IOL PanOptix TFNT00. This study included 262 patients (524 eyes) who had phacoemulsification with IOL implantation, 128 eyes with SN6AD1, 124 eyes with ZKB00, 136 eyes with ZXR00, and 136 eyes with TFNT00. Objective outcomes included one-month postoperative uncorrected (U) and corrected (C) distance (D) and near (N) visual acuities (VA). Subjective outcomes included photic phenomena, spectacle use, and spectacle-independent visual function. Spectacle use (%) in the SN6AD1, ZKB00 ZXR00, and TFNT00 groups was 39, 64, 87, and 37 respectively (P 0.0001). Presence of photic phenomena (%) for SN6AD1, ZKB00, ZXR00, and TFNT00 was 66, 61, and 67, and 73, respectively (P = 0.57). Spectacle-independent mean VF-14 score (%) for SN6AD1, ZKB00, ZXR00, and TFNT00 was 89.5, 87.2, 80.9, and 83.6, respectively (P 0.01). All four IOLs provided excellent postoperative visual acuity and equally high rates of photic phenomena. SN6AD1 and TFNT00 provided the least spectacle use while ZXR00 had the highest spectacle use.

BCLA CLEAR Presbyopia: Management with corneal techniques

Corneal techniques for enhancing near and intermediate vision to correct presbyopia include surgical and contact lens treatment modalities. Broad approaches used independently or in combination include correcting one eye for distant and the other for near or intermediate vision, (termed monovision or mini-monovision depending on the degree of anisometropia) and/or extending the eye’s depth of focus [1]. This report reviews the evidence for the treatment profile, safety, and efficacy of the current range of corneal techniques for managing presbyopia.The visual needs and expectations of the patient, their ocular characteristics, and prior history of surgery are critical considerations for patient selection and preoperative evaluation. Contraindications to refractive surgery include unstable refraction, corneal abnormalities, inadequate corneal thickness for the proposed ablation depth, ocular and systemic co-morbidities, uncontrolled mental health issues and unrealistic patient expectations.Laser refractive options for monovision include surface/stromal ablation techniques and keratorefractive lenticule extraction. Alteration of spherical aberration and multifocal ablation profiles are the primary means for increasing ocular depth of focus, using surface and non-surface laser refractive techniques. Corneal inlays use either small aperture optics to increase depth of field or modify the anterior corneal curvature to induce corneal multifocality. In presbyopia correction by conductive keratoplasty, radiofrequency energy is applied to the mid-peripheral corneal stroma, leading to mid-peripheral corneal shrinkage and central corneal steepening. Hyperopic orthokeratology lens fitting can induce spherical aberration and correct some level of presbyopia.Postoperative management, and consideration of potential complications, varies according to technique applied and the time to restore corneal stability, but a minimum of 3 months of follow-up is recommended after corneal refractive procedures. Ongoing follow-up is important in orthokeratology and longer-term follow-up may be required in the event of late complications following corneal inlay surgery.