AbstractStable waterborne poly(urethane‐urea) (WBPU; soft segment content: 57%; dimethylol propionic acid: 19 mol %/5.8 wt %)–polyacrylate(methyl methacrylate/n‐butyl acrylate) (weight ratio: 4/1) hybrid latex (emulsions) with different acrylic contents [0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 wt % based on poly(urethane‐urea)] and without external surfactant were successfully prepared by in situ polymerization during a prepolymer mixing process. However, the as‐polymerized hybrid latex containing 50 wt % of acrylic monomer content was found to be unstable, indicating that about 50 wt % of acrylic monomer content was beyond the limit value of self‐emulsifying ability of WBPU anionomer prepared in this study. The breadth of particle size distribution of hybrid latex increased markedly from 20–75 to 55–275 nm with increasing acrylic monomer content from 0 to 40 wt %. The pristine WBPU and hybrid latex samples containing 10, 20, and 30 wt % of acrylic monomer showed unimodal distributions, whereas the hybrid sample having 40 wt % acrylic monomer content displayed a bimodal distribution with the broadest breadth. As acrylic monomer content increased, the yield point of stress–strain curve, hardness, glass transition, and water resistance of hybrid film samples increased, whereas their abrasion resistance, elongation at break, and elasticity decreased. The tensile strength of hybrid film samples (10–30 wt % of acrylic monomer content) was almost the same as that of pristine WBPU film sample, indicating the intimate molecular mixing between poly(urethane‐urea) and polyacrylate molecules in hybrids. However, the hybrid sample having 40 wt % acrylic monomer showed significantly diminished performance, which might be due to the deviation from intimate molecular mixing. From these results, the optimum acrylic monomer content was found to be about 30 wt %, which realized reasonably advantages of both poly(urethane‐urea) and acrylic polymer. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011
Read full abstract