Abstract Background Several studies have shown that the implementation of automation in microbiology laboratories may allow for increased volume growth without the need for additional staffing. One of the more recently available pieces of microbiology automation, the COPAN Colibri, automates the manual steps of colony spotting and preparation of targets for use on MALDI-TOF instruments for bacterial identification. This same instrument can also prepare a diluted bacterial inoculum for immediate use on automated susceptibility testing platforms. We wanted to evaluate the performance of both of these functions in real-time with clinical cultures, to determine if implementation would be beneficial over current workflows. Methods The COPAN Colibri was operated following the manufacturer’s recommendations with the exception of the identification of gram-positive organisms. The Colibri is FDA cleared for MALDI-TOF target spotting, however not with the use of formic acid, nor is it FDA cleared for susceptibility suspension preparation. Preliminary data suggested that addition of formic acid was necessary for accurate identification. A subset of cultures were digitally read in real-time as part of clinical workflows, selected for Colibri MALDI-TOF target spotting and Vitek2 suspension preparation using the COPAN WebApp software. Targets were run on the MALDI Bioptyper Sirius (Bruker) and suspensions were run on Vitek2 (BioMerieux) using the pre-dilution mode using GN-99 and GN-801 cards for appropriate organisms. All results were compared to standard manual workflows. Results A total of 145 gram-negative and 60 gram-positive organisms were picked for MALDI-target spotting on Colibri. Compared to standard testing, 144 (99%) gram-negative and 57 (95%) gram-positive Colibri spotted isolates matched expected species-level identifications. 97 Gram negative bacilli were run on Vitek 2 generating 95.52% categorical agreement across all drugs but with 13 major errors (MEs) and 2 very major errors (VMEs), which exceeded the acceptable percentage for certain drugs. The total number of failed runs was 13 (13.34% of total GNB isolates run), and all required complete resetting of MALDI-spotting and suspension preparation. Conclusions The Colibri performed well for MALDI-TOF target spotting with the addition of formic acid for gram-positive organisms. It did not perform within the acceptable range for susceptibility suspension preparation as it exceeded the recommended cutoffs for MEs and VMEs for certain drugs. The proportion of failed runs due to instrument errors may offset any advantages in labor savings due to the need for repeat set up.