Preoperative Pain Visual Analog Scale Score Research Articles

Necessity of acceptable radiologic alignment by preoperative closed reduction for unstable distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plates.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the necessity of achieving acceptable radiographic alignment by preoperative closed reduction in unstable distal radius fractures (DRFs) to improve preoperative pain and obtain satisfactory outcomes after surgery. From 2013 to 2016, patients who received volar locking plates for DRFs were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into acceptable and non-acceptable reduction groups based on immediate post-reduction radiographs. To avoid potential bias, a matched-pair analysis was performed, and paired patients were categorized into non-acceptable reduction (group A) and acceptable reduction (group B) groups. Preoperative pain level, mean length of stay, operation time, postoperative complications, and surgical outcomes were analysed. The preoperative pain level and functional results were assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Of the 239 patients, 80 had non-acceptable and 159 had acceptable reductions. Among these patients, 201 (66 in group A vs. 135 in group B) were matched in a 1:2 matched ratio. Although the radiological parameters after closed reduction were better in group B, there were no significant differences in the preoperative pain VAS score, mean length of stay, operation time, and postoperative complications between the groups. In addition, radiologic parameters and the DASH score at a 1-year follow-up were also not significantly different between the groups. Our results suggest that obtaining acceptable radiologic alignment by closed reduction is not necessary for patients who make an informed decision to undergo volar plating for unstable DRFs.

TL 18172 - Evaluation of surgical outcomes of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis performed through two lateral portals

Objective: The purpose of this study is to present the surgical outcomes of 12 patients who underwent arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using 2 lateral portals (anterior and medial) in the sinus tarsi. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 12 patients (7 men and 5 women) with a mean age of 55.1(36-74) years who underwent arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis through the sinus tarsi from May 2015 to December 2016. The postsurgical follow-up period was 12 months. Union time and postoperative complications were evaluated, and a validated functional questionnaire from the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and the pain visual analog scale (VAS) were applied before and after surgery. Results: The mean time to bone fusion was 11.5 weeks. Bone union occurred in all subjects. Four patients developed late complications, 3 of which were related to screw positioning in the calcaneus and one of which was related to residual hindfoot varus deformity. Screw-related complications are common among subtalar arthrodesis techniques, and such complications are considered minor when the effectiveness of the technique is considered. The mean preoperative AOFAS score was 42.3 (27-66) points, whereas the mean postoperative score was 83 (73-94) points. The mean preoperative pain VAS score was 8.1 (5-10) points, and the mean postoperative pain VAS score was 2.1 (0-5) points. The above data are similar to those reported in the main published studies and reflect high bone union rates. Conclusion: Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis through 2 lateral portals in the sinus tarsi is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of primary and secondary disorders of the subtalar joint. Surgeons must carefully position the screws and align the hindfoot to avoid complications related to orthopedic hardware and hindfoot varus deformity.

The Influence of Patient Factors on the Outcome of Synthetic Cartilage Implant Hemiarthroplasty versus First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Many studies have compared the outcomes of MTPJ1 hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis, but there is a paucity of data on the influence of patient factors on clinical outcomes. A prior prospective, randomized, clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ1) hemiarthroplasty with a synthetic polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implant (Cartiva®) and MTPJ1 arthrodesis for moderate to severe hallux rigidus. The current study evaluated the data from this clinical trial to determine the impact of numerous patient variables, including osteoarthritis grade, hallux valgus angle, preoperative range of motion (ROM), gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative duration of symptoms, and preoperative pain level, on the success or failure of MTPJ1 hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis. Methods: Patients =18 years diagnosed with hallux rigidus grade 2, 3, or 4 were randomized and treated with synthetic cartilage implant MTPJ1 hemiarthroplasty (n=129) or arthrodesis (n=47). Outcome measures included a pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores, and Short Form-36 Physical Functioning (SF-36 PF) subscore, obtained preoperatively and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 52 and 104 weeks postoperatively. Great toe active dorsiflexion motion, secondary procedures, radiographs and safety parameters were evaluated. A patient’s outcome was deemed successful if composite primary endpoint criteria for clinical success (pain, function and safety) were met at 24 months. Predictor variables included: osteoarthritis grade; hallux valgus angle; preoperative ROM; gender; body mass index (BMI); preoperative symptom duration; prior surgery; and preoperative pain level. Two-sided Fisher’s Exact test was used to assess the impact of these variables on success of surgery (p<0.05). Results: Standard patient demographics and baseline outcome measures were similar for both groups; both procedures demonstrated equivalent pain relief and functional outcomes.1 There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in success rates (i.e., VAS pain reduction ≥ 30%, maintenance/improvement in function, freedom from radiographic complications, and no secondary surgical intervention) between synthetic cartilage implant MTPJ1 hemiarthroplasty and arthrodesis when stratified by osteoarthritis grade, degree of preoperative hallux valgus, extent of preoperative ROM, gender, BMI, duration of symptoms, prior MTPJ1 surgery status, and preoperative pain VAS score (Table 1). Notably, patients with minimal ROM and mild hallux valgus had equivalent success rates for both procedures. Males tended to have greater clinical success with implant hemiarthroplasty versus arthrodesis, but this difference was not statistically significant. 1Baumhauer et al., FAI, 2016;37(5):457-69. Conclusion: Synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty is an appropriate treatment for patients with hallux rigidus of Coughlin grade 2, 3 or 4. Its results in those with associated mild hallux valgus (<20 degrees) and in those with a high degree of preoperative stiffness are equivalent to MTPJ1 fusion, irrespective of gender, BMI, osteoarthritis grade, or preoperative pain or duration of symptoms, in contrast to what might have been expected.

Decompression of the superficial peroneal nerve: clinical outcomes and anatomical study.

OBJECTIVE The authors of this study sought to determine the outcomes of patients undergoing superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) release to treat lower-extremity pain and describe consistent anatomical landmarks to direct surgical planning. METHODS This retrospective cohort study examined 54 patients with pain in the SPN distribution who were treated with decompression between 2011 and 2014. Patients rated pain and the effect of pain on quality of life (QOL) on the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Scores were then converted to percentages. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of the preoperative effect of pain on QOL, age, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative duration of pain on the postoperative effect of pain on QOL. Measurements were made intraoperatively in 13 patients to determine the landmarks for identifying the SPN. RESULTS A higher BMI was a negative predictor for improvement in the effect of pain on QOL. A decrease in pain compared with the initial level of pain suggested a nonlinear relationship between these variables. A minority of patients (7 of 16) with a preoperative pain VAS score ≤ 60 reported less pain after surgery. A large majority (30 of 36 patients) of those with a preoperative pain VAS score > 60 reported improvement. Intraoperative measurements demonstrated that the SPN was consistently found to be 5 ± 1.1, 5 ± 1.1, and 6 ± 1.2 cm lateral to the tibia at 10, 15, and 20 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A majority of patients with a preoperative pain VAS score > 60 showed a decrease in postoperative pain. A higher BMI was associated with less improvement in the effect of pain on QOL. This information can be useful when counseling patients on treatment options. Based on the intraoperative data, the authors found that the SPN can be located at reliable points in reference to the tibia and lateral malleolus.

Efficacy of coblation annuloplasty in discogenic low back pain: a prospective observational study.

In degenerative disc, the innervated outer annulus is confirmed to the major origin resulted in discogenic pain. To alleviate the discogenic pain, annuloplasty with electrothermal technology was proved to be effective, which mainly involves the thermal heating of the annulus to denature collagen fibers and denervate posterior annular nerve fibers. However, little is known that efficacy of annuloplasty with coblation technology in treating discogenic pain through directly interrupting nerves in outer annulus.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of coblation annuloplasty for the treatment of discogenic low back pain.In a clinical prospective observational study, 17 consecutive patients with discogenic low back pain underwent coblation annuloplasty under local anesthesia. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, patient responses stating significant (≥50%) pain relief, and modified MacNab criteria were adopted to evaluate the pain intensity, degree of pain relief, and functional status after 6 months of follow-up.The preoperative pain VAS score was 6.5 ± 0.8(95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1–6.9) and the pain VAS score decreased to 2.9 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.1–3.8), 2.9 ± 1.7 (95% CI 2.1–3.8), 3.2 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.4–4.1), 3.2 ± 1.7 (95% CI 2.4–4.2) at 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 month postoperatively, respectively. 12 (70.6%), 11 (64.7%), 10 (58.8%) and 10 (58.8%) of patients reported significant pain relief at 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. At 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, the numbers of patients with “excellent” or “good” ratings were 13 (76.5%), 11 (64.7%), and 10 (58.8%) according to the modified MacNab criteria. No serious complications were observed.The finds show that coblation annuloplasty is an effective, safe, and less uncomfortable procedure in managing discogenic low back pain.

Efficacy of coblation technology in treating cervical discogenic upper back pain.

Upper back pain originating from the cervical disk itself is defined as cervical discogenic upper back pain. Coblation procedures can provide therapeutic effects for neck and radicular pain related to contained cervical disk herniation. However, no studies have reported the performance of coblation procedures, particularly for treating cervical discogenic upper back pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of coblation procedures in treating cervical discogenic upper back pain.In a prospective, clinical, observational study, 28 consecutive patients with discogenic upper back pain underwent coblation procedures on the cervical disk with a percutaneous anterior approach. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, patient responses stating significant (≥50%) pain relief, significant (≥50%) reduction in pain medicine intake and Modified MacNab criteria were adopted to evaluate the pain intensity, degree of pain relief, and functional status after 12 months of follow-up.The preoperative pain VAS score was 6.5 ± 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.085–6.915), and the pain VAS score significantly decreased to 2.4 ± 1.3 (95% CI 1.929–2.928), 2.5 ± 1.5 (95% CI 1.963–3.109), 2.7 ± 1.4 (95% CI 2.157–3.271), 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.457–3.686), and 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.471–3.743) at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.05). Twenty-two (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), 19 (67.9%), and 18 (64.3%) of the patients expressed significant pain relief at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. 24 (85.7%), 23 (82.1%), 23 (82.1%), and 22 (78.6%) reported significant reduction in pain medication intake at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. According to the Modified MacNab criteria, the numbers of patients with “excellent” or “good” ratings were 22 (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), and 18 (64.3%) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. No serious complications were observed.The findings of this study showed that coblation is an effective, safe, minimally invasive, and less uncomfortable procedure for the treatment of discogenic upper back pain.