Use Of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Articles

Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a mainstay for breast cancer management, and obtaining negative margins is critical. Some have advocated for the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing positive margins after BCS. We sought to determine whether preoperative MRI was associated with reduced positive margins. The SHAVE/SHAVE2 trials were multicenter trials in ten US centers with patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing BCS. Use of preoperative MRI was at the discretion of the surgeon. We evaluated whether or not preoperative MRI was associated with margin status prior to randomization regarding resection of cavity with shave margins. A total of 631 patients participated. Median age was 64 (range 29-94) years, with a median tumor size of 1.3 cm (range 0.1-9.3cm). Patient factors included 26.1% of patients (165) had palpable tumors, and 6.5% (41) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor factors were notable for invasive lobular histology in 7.0% (44) and extensive intraductal component (EIC) in 32.8% (207). A preoperative MRI was performed in 193 (30.6%) patients. Those who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to have a positive margin (31.1% versus 38.8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). On multivariate analysis, controlling for patient and tumor factors, utilization of preoperative MRI was not a significant factor in predicting margin status (p = 0.110). Rather, age (p = 0.032) and tumor size (p = 0.040) were the only factors associated with margin status. These data suggest that preoperative MRI is not associated margin status; rather, patient age and tumor size are the associated factors.

Current Trends in the Utilization of Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

The clinical benefit of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early-stage breast cancer (BC) remains controversial. We examined trends and the associated factors of preoperative breast MRI use. This study cohort, constructed from Optum Clinformatics database, included women with early-stage BC who had a cancer surgery between March 1, 2008, and December 31, 2020. Preoperative breast MRI was performed between the date of BC diagnosis and index surgery. Multivariable logistic regressions, one for elderly (65 years and older) and the other for non-elderly patients (younger than 65 years), were performed to examine factors associated with the use of preoperative MRI. Among 92,077 women with early-stage BC, the crude rate of preoperative breast MRI increased from 48% in 2008 to 60% in 2020 for nonelderly and from 27% to 34% for elderly women. For both age groups, non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely (odds ratio [OR]; 95% CI, younger than 65 years: 0.75, 0.70 to 0.81; 65 years and older: 0.77, 0.72 to 0.83) to receive preoperative MRI than non-Hispanic White patients. Across Census divisions, the highest adjusted rate was observed in Mountain division (OR compared with New England; 95% CI, younger than 65 years: 1.45, 1.27 to 1.65; 65 years and older: 2.42, 2.16 to 2.72). Other factors included younger age, fewer comorbidities, family history of BC, axillary node involvement, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for both age groups. The use of preoperative breast MRI has steadily increased. Aside from clinical factors, age, race/ethnicity, and geographic location were associated with preoperative MRI use. This information is important for future implementation or deimplementation strategies of preoperative MRI.

Abstract PD16-01: Racial Disparities in the Use of Preoperative Breast MRI after Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Abstract Introduction: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to surgical treatment for breast cancer has greatly increased over the past decade. As MRI more accurately defines disease extent vs mammography and sonography, it is frequently utilized for staging women at elevated risk of occult disease due to young age, dense breast tissue, and/or lobular histology. However, it is not known whether women from different racial backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses have equal access to preoperative breast MRI. The goal of this study was to assess whether the use of preoperative breast MRI varies by race and insurance type. Methods: We identified adult women who were diagnosed with Stage 0-III breast cancer within our mixed academic/community health system between 2016-2019 and were subsequently treated with surgical resection. We limited our analysis to non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women, as they comprised 93% of the eligible cohort. Patients who underwent breast MRI between their date of diagnosis and date of surgery were considered to have had a “preoperative MRI.” We used multivariable logistic regression to quantify the association between patient factors and receipt of preoperative MRI. Covariates included patient race, insurance type, age, year of diagnosis, clinical stage, histology, breast density, receptor subtype, and receipt of neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Results: 1,268 women met inclusion criteria and had complete clinical information available for analysis. 362 (29%) were Black, and 906 (71%) were White. 718 (57%) had private insurance, 460 (36%) had Medicare, and 72 (6%) had Medicaid. Compared to White patients, a larger proportion of Black patients had Medicaid (15% vs. 2.0%), fatty or scattered density (i.e., level 1 or 2) breasts (69% vs 48%), and regional disease (26% vs 19%) (Table). Patients with Medicare had the highest proportion of fatty or scattered density breasts (67% vs private=46% vs Medicaid=56%), while patients with Medicaid had the highest proportion of regional disease (35% vs private=23% vs Medicare=15%). The proportion of patients who received preoperative MRI was higher for White (49%) vs Black women (37%, p< 0.001). After adjustment, Black patients were 52% less likely to undergo preoperative MRI compared to White patients (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.35-0.66, p< 0.001). Compared to privately-insured patients, patients with Medicare had a similar likelihood of undergoing preoperative MRI (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54-1.22, p=0.309), while patients with Medicaid may have had a lower likelihood of undergoing preoperative MRI (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30-1.00, p=0.053). Conclusions: Black patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were less likely than White patients to undergo preoperative breast MRI, a disparity that persisted after controlling for insurance and clinical factors. Algorithmic use of preoperative MRI may mitigate provider- and system-level biases and promote more equitable resource utilization. Table 1: Characteristics of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, diagnosed and treated at our institution (2016-2019) *Biomarker data for 2019 cohort is pending Citation Format: Sara P. Ginzberg, Connor B. Grady, Oluwadamilola (Lola) Fayanju, Christine E. Edmonds. Racial Disparities in the Use of Preoperative Breast MRI after Breast Cancer Diagnosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD16-01.

Abstract PD15-08: PD15-08 Brazilian Randomized Study - BREAST-MRI Trial - Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation for Breast Cancer Conservative Surgery: Local recurrence and surgical outcomes

Abstract Introduction: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity in detecting invasive neoplasms. However, controversy remains as to whether preoperative staging with breast MRI impacts surgical outcomes and local recurrence. Materials and Methods: BREAST-MRI is a randomized, open-label trial including female breast cancer patients older than 18 years old, with stage 0-III disease, eligible for BCS. We performed a 1:1 stratified randomization by breast density according to ACR-BIRADS to divide patients into two groups; one in which preoperative MRI was used and the control group where the MRI was not used. The primary outcome was local relapse-free survival (LR). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), repeat operation, and the proportion of patients whose surgical management was modified to mastectomy. Results: 524 were randomized, 257 included in the MRI group, and 267 in the control group. The baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for chemotherapy use (table 1). The survival analysis showed a 6-year local recurrence-free survival was 99.2% in MRI group versus 98.9% in the control group, p=0.702, overall survival of 95.3% in the MRI group versus 96.3% in the control group, p=0.481. No difference was found in reoperation rates, 22 (8.7%) in the MRI group versus 23 (8.7%) in the control group (p= 0.85)(table2). Surgical management changed in 21 ipsilateral breasts in the MRI group; 21 (8.3%) had mastectomies versus 1 in the control group (p< 0.01). Conclusion: Preoperative MRI evaluation increased the mastectomy rates by 8%. The use of preoperative MRI did not influence local relapse-free survival, overall survival, or reoperation rates Keywords: breast magnetic resonance imaging; breast cancer; conservative surgery; MRI accuracy, surgical outcomes, randomized clinical trial Citation Format: Bruna S. Mota, Yedda N. Reis, Nestor Barros, Natalia Cardoso, Rosa s. Mota, Carlos Shimizu, Tatiana Tucunduva, Rodrigo Gonçalves, Maira T. Doria, Vera Ferreira, Marcos Ricci, Angela Trinconi, Rachel Riera, Edmund C. Baracat, José Maria Soares Jr, Jose Roberto Filassi. PD15-08 Brazilian Randomized Study - BREAST-MRI Trial - Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation for Breast Cancer Conservative Surgery: Local recurrence and surgical outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD15-08.

Effects of preoperative magnetic resonance image on survival rates and surgical planning in breast cancer conservative surgery: randomized controlled trial (BREAST-MRI trial)

BackgroundBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity in detecting invasive neoplasms. Controversy remains about its impact on the preoperative staging of breast cancer surgery. This study evaluated survival and surgical outcomes of preoperative MRI in conservative breast cancer surgery.MethodsA phase III, randomized, open-label, single-center trial including female breast cancer participants, stage 0–III disease, and eligible for breast-conserving surgery. We compared the role of including MRI in preoperative evaluation versus radiologic exam routine with mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer conservative candidates. The primary outcome was local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), mastectomy rate, and reoperation rate.Results524 were randomized to preoperative MRI group (n = 257) or control group (n = 267). The survival analysis showed a 5.9-years LRFS of 99.2% in MRI group versus 98.9% in control group (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.12—4.28; p = 0.7) and an OS of 95.3% in the MRI group versus 96.3% in the control group (HR = 1.37 95% CI 0.59–3.19; p = 0.8). Surgical management changed in 21 ipsilateral breasts in the MRI group; 21 (8.3%) had mastectomies versus one in the control group. No difference was found in reoperation rates, 22 (8.7%) in the MRI group versus 23 (8.7%) in the control group (RR = 1.002; 95% CI 0.57–1.75; p = 0.85).ConclusionPreoperative MRI increased the mastectomy rates by 8%. The use of preoperative MRI did not influence local relapse-free survival, overall survival, or reoperation rates.

Does magnetic resonance imaging impact pre-operative plans in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients? A retrospective study

Objectives: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been rigorously discussed in academia for the better part of a century, primarily due to its nuanced and complex management. To date, there are no universal criteria for its management. The use of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in all patients with AIS is still debatable. We aimed to determine the necessity of using pre-operative routine MRI assessment in all patients treated for AIS. Methods: A retrospective and descriptive medical chart review study was done. We examined AIS patients diagnosed between 10 and 18 years of age who underwent surgical treatment between 2016 and 2020. A full medical history and a complete spine clinical examination were performed on all patients. Results: Of 267 consecutive patients with verified AIS who underwent surgical correction, 176 were included in the analysis. All patients had normal pre-operative physical and neurological examinations. There were 138 (78%) female and 38 (22%) male patients. MRI findings of neural axis abnormalities were observed in eight of 176 patients (4.54%). Conclusion: In our study, the incidence of abnormalities in the neural axis was low and no additional neurosurgical procedures were performed. This could be due to our strict inclusion criteria. However, we cannot establish a recommendation regarding the routine use of pre-operative MRI. A meta-analysis of the currently available data may provide a better assessment in terms of cost-effectiveness and pave the way for the implementation of guidelines for screening protocols.

LONG-TERM SURVIVAL EFFECTS OF PREOPERATIVE BREAST MRI IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY.

The benefit of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is unclear. Our study compared breast cancer patients with and without preoperative breast MRI and their long-term oncologic outcomes are reported. A total of 1378 BCS cases with early breast cancer between 1996 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients with carcinoma in situ or neoadjuvant treatment or having breast MRI after tumor excision were excluded. Of 1378 patients, 270 (19.5%) had preoperative MRI. There were no significant differences regarding T and N stage and molecular subtypes between the groups. Surgical margins were significantly wider in the breast MRI group. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 96.9% in the MRI group and 94.3% in the control group, and this difference was not significant (p=0.11). Five-year local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was not significantly different either (98.8% and 96.5%, respectively, p=0.41). When analyses were repeated only for patients with hormone receptor-negative or triple-negative breast cancer, there was still no significant difference in OS, LRFS, or disease-free survival. In conclusion, MRI does not seem necessary in all patients undergoing BCS. New prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to determine appropriate use of preoperative MRI and its effects on oncologic outcomes in early breast cancer patients.

Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: A Review.

Despite the high sensitivity and widespread use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the American Cancer Society and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not recommend the routine use of preoperative MRI owing to the conflicting results and lack of clear benefit to the surgical outcome (reoperation and mastectomy) and long-term clinical outcomes (local recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer). Preoperative MRI detects additional cancers that are occult at mammography and ultrasound but increases the rate of mastectomy. Concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of preoperative MRI might be mitigated by adjusting the confounding factors when conducting studies, using the state-of-the-art image-guided biopsy technique, applying the radiologists’ cumulative experiences in interpreting MRI findings, and performing multiple lumpectomies in patients with multicentric cancer. Among the various imaging methods, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI has the highest accuracy in predicting pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective trials aimed at applying the MRI information to the de-escalation of surgical or radiation treatments are underway. In this review, current studies on the clinical outcomes of preoperative breast MRI are updated, and circumstances in which MRI may be useful for surgical planning are discussed.

The selective use of preoperative MRI in the staging of breast cancer: a single-institution experience.

Routine use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for loco-regional staging of breast cancer remains controversial. At Counties Manukau District Health Board (CMDHB), preoperative breast MRI is used selectively within a multidisciplinary setting. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of selective use of preoperative MRI in staging loco-regional disease and how it has impacted our clinical practice. Patients who received preoperative MRI at CMDHB between October 2015 and October 2018 were identified on a prospective database. The decision to offer MRI was made by multidisciplinary consensus. Patient data were collected retrospectively from clinical, imaging and histology records. The accuracy of MRI was determined by comparing it against histology as gold standard, and its potential contribution to treatment decisions and treatment delay was determined by clinical record review. Ninety-two patients received preoperative MRI. Additional foci of cancer were identified in ten patients (11%). Sixteen patients (17%) required additional biopsies. In fourteen patients (15%), MRI identified more extensive disease than conventional imaging prompting a change of surgical management. This 'upstaging' was confirmed histologically in twelve (13%). In one (1%) patient, MRI incorrectly 'downstaged' disease, but it did not alter the management. No patients experienced a delay in treatment due to MRI. A selective, considered use of preoperative MRI within a multidisciplinary setting at our local institution results in more biopsies but with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio. It provides accurate staging to aid treatment decisions without resulting in a delay in treatment.

A Meta-analysis of the Association Between Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Surgical Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer

IntroductionThe use of preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in newly diagnosed breast cancer has been increasing. However, the value of MRI applied to the women with newly diagnosed breast cancer remains controversial. Therefore, this study focused on the association between preoperative MRI and surgical outcomes, which include mastectom y rate, breast conservation rate, and re-excision rate.Material and methodsA systematic literature search was performed by the Wan fang, VIP (Chinese biomedical databases), PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Vip databases. The keywords were "breast cancer", "magnetic resonance imaging", "mastectomy rate", "re-excision rate", and "breast conservation rate." A random-effects model was used to estimate the proportion of women with various outcomes in the MRI group, versus a non-MRI group. The odds ratio (OR) for each surgical outcome were calculated.Results4 RCTs (Randomized Controlled Trial) met the eligibility criteria that included a total of 2312 patients with breast cancer. The analysis results of the MRI group versus the non-MRI group were as follows: Mastectomy rate of 15% versus 10%, OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.79-5.11, P=0.14; Breast conservation rate 84% versus 89%, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.29-1.17, P=0.13; Re-excision rate 17% versus 19%, OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37-1.54, P=0.45.ConclusionsThere was no significant association between preoperative MRI and surgical outcomes. This study suggested that the use of preoperative MRI should be selective. The results showed that the application of preoperative MRI didn’t improve the prognosis of breast cancer patients. More randomized trials are needed for further study due to limited randomized trials.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) delineates disease extent sensitively in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but improved cancer outcomes are uncertain. Young women, for whom mammography is less sensitive, are expected to benefit from MRI-based resection. We identified 512 women aged ≤50 years, undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT: tumor-free resection margins and radiotherapy) during 2006–2013 through Northwestern Medicine database queries; 64.5% received preoperative MRI and 35.5% did not. Tumor and treatment parameters were similar between groups. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for local and distant recurrences (LR and DR), using multivariable regression models, accounting for important therapeutic and prognostic parameters. LR rate with MRI use was 7.9 vs. 8.2% without MRI, aHR = 1.03 (95% CI 0.53–1.99). DR rate was 6.4 vs. 6.6%, aHR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.43–1.84). In 119 women aged ≤40, results were similar to LR aHR = 1.82 (95% CI 0.43–7.76) and DR aHR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.26–3.34). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. The use of preoperative MRI in women aged ≤50 years should be reconsidered until there is proof of benefit.

Anatomy of Classic Bladder Exstrophy: MRI Findings and Surgical Correlation.

The exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC) represents a group of congenitally acquired malformations involving the musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems. Classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) is the most common and best studied entity within the EEC. In this review, imaging features of CBE anatomy will be presented with surgical correlation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a useful modality for pre- and postnatal assessment of the abdominal wall, pelvic floor, and gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems of children with CBE. The authors' experience supports use of preoperative MRI, in conjunction with navigational software, as a method for identifying complex CBE anatomy. Imaging facilitates surgical approach and improves visualization of complex anatomy, potentially helping to avoid complications. Continued investigation of imaging guidance in CBE repair is needed as surgical techniques improve.

Preoperative breast MRI and mortality in older women with breast cancer.

The survival benefit from detecting additional breast cancers by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continues to be controversial. We followed a cohort of 4454 women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (stage I-III) from 2/2005-6/2010 in five registries of the breast cancer surveillance consortium (BCSC). BCSC clinical and registry data were linked to Medicare claims and enrollment data. We estimated the cumulative probability of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. We tested the association of preoperative MRI with all-cause mortality using a Cox proportional hazards model. 917 (20.6%) women underwent preoperative MRI. No significant difference in the cumulative probability of breast cancer-specific mortality was found. We observed no significant difference in the hazard of all-cause mortality during the follow-up period after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors among women with MRI (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.72-1.12) compared to those without MRI. Our findings of no breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality benefit supplement prior results that indicate a lack of improvement in surgical outcomes associated with use of preoperative MRI. In combination with other reports, the results of this analysis highlight the importance of exploring the benefit of preoperative MRI in patient-reported outcomes such as women's decision quality and confidence levels with decisions involving treatment choices.

Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use by Breast Density and Family History of Breast Cancer.

Use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among women with a new breast cancer has increased over the past decade. MRI use is more frequent in younger women and those with lobular carcinoma, but associations with breast density and family history of breast cancer are unknown. Data for 3075 women ages >65 years with stage 0-III breast cancer who underwent breast conserving surgery or mastectomy from 2005 to 2010 in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium were linked to administrative claims data to assess associations of preoperative MRI use with mammographic breast density and first-degree family history of breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association of MRI use with breast density and family history, adjusting for woman and tumor characteristics. Overall, preoperative MRI use was 16.4%. The proportion of women receiving breast MRI was similar by breast density (17.6% dense, 16.9% nondense) and family history (17.1% with family history, 16.5% without family history). After adjusting for potential confounders, we found no difference in preoperative MRI use by breast density (OR = 0.95 for dense vs. nondense, 95% CI: 0.73-1.22) or family history (OR = 0.99 for family history vs. none, 95% CI: 0.73-1.32). Among women aged >65 years with breast cancer, having dense breasts or a first-degree relative with breast cancer was not associated with greater preoperative MRI use. This utilization is in keeping with lack of evidence that MRI has higher yield of malignancy in these subgroups.

Preoperative breast MRI-examination for all patients with histologically proven breast cancer? A concept for a prospective multicenter trial.

Background A published retrospective data of our study group demonstrated that premenopausal women, patients with lobular invasive breast cancer or patients with high breast density [American College of Radiology (ACR) classification 3+4] significantly benefit from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) leading to additional detection of malignant foci of 20.2% in the index and 2.5% in the contralateral breast, which would otherwise not be detected by routine imaging. Critics of preoperative MRI focus on higher false-positive rates leading to unnecessary surgical procedures and mastectomies. Therefore, MRI in preoperative imaging remains controversial. Methods To validate our retrospective data we initiate a prospective one-armed multicenter trial for patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer performing routine imaging by ultrasound and mammography followed by MRI imaging based on menopause status, histologic subtype, ACR and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS)-classification. Primary endpoint is the rate of additional findings and change of treatment strategy, secondary endpoints are local recurrence-free, distant recurrence-free and overall survival. Additional MRI findings are calculated to be above 10% with a number of 100 patients recruited and a power of 80%. Conclusion MRI is detecting more tumor foci than conventional imaging but remains controversial in primary breast cancer for preoperative imaging because of the fear of over-diagnosis and the increased morbidity of additional potentially unnecessary surgical procedures. This planned one-armed prospective multicenter trial is designed to confirm our retrospectively revealed data defining subgroups with significant benefit of preoperative MRI to come to a consensus avoiding over-diagnosis and false-positive results leading to clinically beneficial and cost-effective use of preoperative MRI.

Impact of value based breast cancer care pathway implementation on pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging utilization.

Bilateral breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used in the diagnostic workup of breast cancer (BC) to assess extent of disease and identify occult foci of disease. However, evidence for routine use of pre-operative MRI is lacking. Breast MRI is costly and can lead to unnecessary tests and treatment delays. Clinical care pathways (care paths) are value-based guidelines, which define management recommendations derived by expert consensus and available evidence based data. At Cleveland Clinic, care paths created for newly diagnosed BC patients recommend selective use of pre-operative MRI. We evaluated the number of pre-operative MRIs ordered before and after implementing an institution wide BC care paths in April 2014. A retrospective review was conducted of BC cases during the years 2012, 2014, and part of 2015. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected. Pre-operative MRI utilization was compared before and after care path implementation. We identified 1,515 BC patients during the study period. Patients were more likely to undergo pre-operative MRI in 2012 than 2014 (OR: 2.77; P<0.001; 95% CI: 1.94-3.94) or 2015 (OR: 4.14; P<0.001; 95% CI: 2.51-6.83). There was a significant decrease in pre-operative MRI utilization between 2012 and 2014 (P<0.001) after adjustment for pre-operative MRIs ordered for care path indications. Implementation of online BC care paths at our institution was associated with a decreased use of pre-operative MRI overall and in patients without a BC care path indication, driving value based care through the reduction of pre-operative breast MRIs.

Magnetic resonance imaging correlation to intraoperative findings of deeply infiltrative endometriosis

To show characteristics of deeply infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and how they correlate with intraoperative findings. Overview of still and dynamic MRI images of four different patients with DIE. We then used videos from their surgeries to highlight the appearance of endometriosis corresponding to these images (educational video). University hospital. Four different patients with DIE were included in this video. These were all women of reproductive age who suffered from debilitating deeply infiltrative endometriosis. These patients had a pelvic MRI performed at our institution and subsequently underwent surgery with one of our minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons. The MRI endometriosis protocol includes T1-weighted fat and nonfat saturated as well as T2-weighted sequences. Images are taken along all three planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal) before and after contrast. What distinguishes the standard MRI from the endometriosis-protocol MRI is the thickness of the slices taken. For the evaluation of endometriosis, T1 nonfat saturated images are taken in 6-mm slices with no skip sections in between. Then, T1 fat saturated images and T2-weighted images are taken in 5-mm slices with a 1-mm skip section in between slices. The areas that are suspicious for lesions consistent with DIE are corroborated on videos taken during surgery. Value of accurate mapping of lesions with the use of preoperative MRI in surgical planning and complete resection of diseased tissue. Results from a previously published prospective study by Bazot etal. reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 90.3%, 91%, 92.1%, and 89%, respectively. Similarly to our institution, that study used a 1.5-T MRI, and the protocol of our institution closely mimicked the technique used in that study. Another prospective study published by Hottat etal. showed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MRI predicting intraoperative disease of 96.3%, 100%, 100%, and 93.3% respectively. Those results were gathered with the use of a 3.0-T MRI. The high accuracy in these studies of prediction of deep pelvic endometriosis in specific locations shows that MRI is effective for preoperative planning, as was the case for the four patients in our video. Preoperative planning for DIE with the use of MRI is integral in surgical planning. Other imaging modalities to diagnose DIE, such as transvaginal ultrasound, endoanal ultrasound, barium enema, cystoscopy, and rectoscopy, have all been used and studied for the evaluation of endometriosis. However, given its accuracy for mapping lesions, MRI could potentially replace multiple types of imaging while offering the best option for preoperative planning. Accurate mapping would result in greater success of resection and allow for multidisciplinary planning if necessary. Furthermore, being able to train the eye to identify lesions on MRI that are consistent with DIE is an asset to the gynecologic surgeon.

The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment and Surgical Treatment of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancer in Older Women.

We describe the relationship between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the utilization of additional imaging, biopsy, and primary surgical treatment for subgroups of women with interval versus screen-detected breast cancer. We determined the proportion of women receiving additional breast imaging or biopsy and type of primary surgical treatment, stratified by use of preoperative MRI, separately for both groups. Using Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) data, we identified a cohort of women age 66 and older with an interval or screen-detected breast cancer diagnosis between 2005 and 2010. Using logistic regression, we explored associations between primary surgical treatment type and preoperative MRI use for interval and screen-detected cancers. There were 204 women with an interval cancer and 1,254 with a screen-detected cancer. The interval cancer group was more likely to receive preoperative MRI (21% versus 13%). In both groups, women receiving MRI were more likely to receive additional imaging and/or biopsy. Receipt of MRI was not associated with increased odds of mastectomy (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67-1.50), while interval cancer diagnosis was associated with significantly higher odds of mastectomy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.11-2.42). Older women with interval cancer were more likely than women with a screen-detected cancer to have preoperative MRI, however, those with an interval cancer had 64% higher odds of mastectomy regardless of receipt of MRI. Given women with interval cancer are reported to have a worse prognosis, more research is needed to understand effectiveness of imaging modalities and treatment consequences within this group.

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral breast cancer occurrence among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Although preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect mammographically occult contralateral breast cancers (CBCs) among women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the impact of MRI on the incidence of subsequent CBC events is unclear. We examined whether MRI use decreases CBC occurrences and detection of invasive disease among women who develop a CBC. Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset, we assessed overall, synchronous (<6months after primary cancer diagnosis), and subsequent (≥6months after diagnosis, i.e., metachronous) CBC occurrence in women aged 67-94years diagnosed with DCIS during 2004-2009, with follow-up through 2011. We applied a matched propensity score approach to compare the stage-specific incidence rate of CBC according to MRI use. Our sample consisted of 9166 beneficiaries, 1258 (13.7%) of whom received preoperative MRI. After propensity score matching, preoperative MRI use was significantly associated with a higher synchronous CBC detection rate (108.6 vs. 29.7 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR]=3.65; p<.001) with no significant differences in subsequent CBC rate (6.7 vs. 6.8 per 1000 person-years; HR=0.90; p=.71). The 6-year cumulative incidence of any CBC (in situ plus invasive) remained significantly higher among women undergoing MRI, compared with those not undergoing MRI (9 vs. 4%, p<.001). Women undergoing MRI also had a higher incidence of invasive CBC (4 vs. 3%, p=.04). MRI use resulted in an increased detection of synchronous CBC but did not prevent subsequent CBC occurrence, suggesting that many of the undetected CBC lesions may not become clinically evident.

Factors Associated with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use among Medicare Beneficiaries with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer

Factors Associated with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use among Medicare Beneficiaries with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer