Preoperative Intravenous Iron Research Articles

A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of Intravenous Iron versus Red Cell Transfusions for Preoperative Iron-Deficiency Anemia.

While preoperative anemia is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes, the benefits of treatment with iron replacement versus red blood cell (RBC) transfusion remain uncertain. We used a national database to establish trends in preoperative iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) treatment and to test the hypothesis that treatment with preoperative iron may be superior to RBC transfusion. This study is a propensity-matched retrospective cohort analysis from 2003 to 2023 using TriNetX Research Network, which included surgical patients diagnosed with IDA within 3 months preoperatively. After matching for surgery type and comorbidities, we compared a cohort of patients with preoperative IDA who were treated with preoperative intravenous (IV) iron but not RBCs (n = 77,179), with a cohort receiving preoperative RBCs but not IV iron (n = 77,179). Propensity-score matching was performed for age, ethnicity, race, sex, overweight and obesity, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension, heart failure, chronic ischemic heart disease, neoplasms, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease, nicotine dependence, surgery type, and lab values from the day of surgery including ferritin, transferrin, and hemoglobin split into low (<7 g/dL), medium (7-<12 g/dL), and high (≥12 g/dL) to account for anemia severity. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality with the secondary outcomes being 30-day morbidity, postoperative hemoglobin level, and 30-day postoperative RBC transfusion. Compared with RBC transfusion, preoperative IV iron was associated with lower risk of postoperative mortality (n = 2550/77,179 [3.3%] vs n = 4042/77,179 [5.2%]; relative risk [RR], 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.66), and a lower risk of postoperative composite morbidity (n = 14,174/77,179 [18.4%] vs n = 18,632/77,179 [24.1%]; RR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.75-0.78) (both P = .001 after Bonferroni adjustment). Compared with RBC transfusion, IV iron was also associated with a higher hemoglobin in the 30-day postoperative period (10.1 ± 1.8 g/dL vs 9.4 ± 1.7 g/dL, P = .001 after Bonferroni adjustment) and a reduced incidence of postoperative RBC transfusion (n = 3773/77,179 [4.9%] vs n = 12,629/77,179 [16.4%]; RR, 0.30, 95% CI, 0.29-0.31). In a risk-adjusted analysis, preoperative IDA treatment with IV iron compared to RBC transfusion was associated with a reduction in 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity, a higher 30-day postoperative hemoglobin level, and reduced postoperative RBC transfusion. This evidence represents a promising opportunity to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood transfusions and their associated risk and costs.

Efficacy of a pre-operative anaemia clinic in patients undergoing elective abdominal cancer surgery.

Pre-operative iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery and is associated with increased risk of perioperative complications. However, widespread implementation of pre-operative anaemia management is lacking. Guidelines recommend investigation of anaemia preferably 4-6 weeks before surgery to allow time for correction. However, this is not always feasible in abdominal cancer surgery with short time to surgery and may be influenced by concomitant chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of implementing a pre-operative screening and treatment programme for IDA in elective abdominal cancer surgery patients, with short duration to surgery and concomitant use of chemotherapy. All patients scheduled for elective abdominal cancer surgery with IDA were included. Anaemia was defined according to the World Health Organization-criteria and iron deficiency as a transferrin saturation <0.20. The primary outcome was change in haemoglobin (Hb) between iron infusion and surgery in patients receiving pre-operative intravenous iron infusion. Of 178 diagnosed IDA patients 134 (75%) received intravenous iron, 103 pre-operatively (58%) at median day 17 (interquartile range: 9-27) before surgery while 31 (17%) received post-operative intravenous iron treatment. The pre-operative Hb increased 0.89 g/dL (95% CI: 0.64-1.13, p < .001) compared to a decrease of 0.4 g/dL (95% CI: 0.19-0.58, p < .001) in 75 patients not treated pre-operatively. Patients diagnosed with severe anaemia had the largest pre-operative Hb increase. Iron infusion >2 weeks pre-operatively resulted in a greater Hb increment of 1.13 g/dL (95% CI: 0.81-1.45) compared to iron infusion ≤2 weeks before surgery 0.48 g/dL (95% CI: 0.16-0.81). Hb increased by 0.64 g/dL (95% CI 0.19-1.21) in patients receiving chemotherapy ≤31 days prior to surgery. In patients scheduled for abdominal cancer surgery, including in patients with concomitant chemotherapy, pre-operative IDA management is feasible and results in a significant pre-operative Hb increase compared to patients not treated. On the day of surgery 25% patients treated pre-operatively were no longer anaemic.

Preoperative Intravenous Iron Reduces the Need for Blood Transfusion in Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Approximately 30% to 60% of the general surgical population is commonly affected by preoperative anemia*. This form of anemia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and impaired recovery.[1] Hence, planning potentially high-blood-loss surgery, especially patients with preoperative anemia, requires proper advance planning to allow time for adequate identification, assessment, and management to avoid adverse events.

Preoperative intravenous iron and the risk of blood transfusion in colorectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Preoperative intravenous iron and the risk of blood transfusion in colorectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

The Effect of Preoperative Intravenous Iron Therapy on Postdischarge Incidence of Anemia in Anemic Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery

The Effect of Preoperative Intravenous Iron Therapy on Postdischarge Incidence of Anemia in Anemic Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery

What we should consider to facilitate recovery of the hematological profile in all patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the role of preoperative intravenous iron treatment

BackgroundIn pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the duodenum and upper jejunum responsible for iron absorption are removed, which can lead to massive hemorrhage during surgery and cause iron deficiency anemia after PD. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall changes in hematologic profiles of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Effect of preoperative intravenous iron treatment on recovery of anemia after surgery was also investigated.MethodsFrom March 2021 to December 2021, patients who underwent curative PD at our institution due to periampullary lesions were enrolled. They were divided into two groups according to whether or not iron was administered before surgery. In the IV iron group, all patients had been routinely administered with 1000 mg of ferric carboxymaltose intravenously once about 3–7 days before the operation day. Contrarily, patients in the control group did not receive intravenous iron before PD. Changes in hematological profile were measured preoperatively and at 5, 14, and 30 days postoperatively. Clinical results of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was performed for selected non-anemic patients who had preoperative hemoglobin level of 12.0 g/dl or higher to compare changes in hematologic profiles between the two groups.ResultsThirty patients of the IV iron group and 34 patients of the control group were analyzed. Although no difference was observed in postoperative complications or mortality, hemoglobin and iron levels were recovered significantly faster at two weeks postoperatively in the IV iron group than in the control group. Iron levels were significantly higher in the IV iron group throughout the postoperative period. In subgroup analysis conducted for non-anemic patients, hemoglobin levels were recovered significantly faster and maintained higher in the IV iron group throughout the postoperative period, although baseline levels of hemoglobin were similar between the two groups. In addition, the length of intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter in the IV iron group than in the control group.ConclusionsPreoperative intravenous iron treatment might be effective in facilitating recovery of hematologic profiles of patients during the recovery period after PD regardless of the presence of preoperative anemia, thus preventing postoperative iron deficiency anemia.

Preoperative intravenous iron treatment – a cohort study on colorectal cancer recurrence

BackgroundIntravenous (i.v.) iron treatment has been speculated to increase the malignant potential of colorectal malignancies but also to enhance the immune systems potential to fight the invasive tumor. Clinical data however is very limited. We investigate if preoperative i.v. iron treatment is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence. MethodsRetrospective cohort study on surgical CRC patients with iron deficiency anemia (1st March 2013 - 31st December 2019). Patients were grouped based on whether they had received preoperative treatment with i.v. iron. Local data was combined with data from the National Danish Health registries to identify recurrences, death, and emigration. Survival analysis, including Kaplan-Meyer curves and multivariate competing risk analysis adjusting for sex, age, ASA-group, tumor stage, surgical radicality, and miss match repair status was performed. ResultsOf 1228 patients, 125 were available for analysis. 89 patients had received preoperative i.v. iron and 36 had not. The two groups were comparable on baseline and surgical characteristics. Median follow-up times were 4.74 in iron treated patients and 5 years in patients not receiving iron treatment. Five-year rate of non-recurrence was 85 % (0.74–0.91) in the i.v. iron treated group vs. 82 % (0.64–0.91) in the control group, non-significant difference. Multivariate survival analysis did not find iron treatment to be associated with recurrence rates (Hazard Ratio 0.88 (95 % ci; 0.31–2.51). ConclusionNo association between preoperative i.v. iron treatment and the five-year cancer recurrence rate in iron deficient anemic CRC patients was found.

Effect of Preoperative Intravenous Iron for Anemic Patients on Outcomes after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Iron-deficiency anemia is a global health problem and a common medical condition seen in everyday clinical practice and especially with patients going through cardiac surgery. The most rapid and effective method of correcting anemia is by transfusion of red blood cells. However, blood transfusion itself is not without risk. Treatment of perioperative anemia using iron replacement therapy is, in contrast to blood transfusion, a safe, cheap, and relatively convenient therapy Aim of the Work This study aims to perform a systematic review regarding the effect of preoperative intravenous iron therapy on the need for perioperative blood transfusion and the incidence of major morbidity in anemic patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Search Methodology The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and articles were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, COCHRANE Database of systematic reviews (CDSR), Scopus, and Web of Science. Quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 (ROB-2) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies tool (ROBANS). The primary outcomes are change in hemoglobin and hematocrit after cardiac surgery and perioperative need for blood transfusion, while secondary outcomes are postoperative length of hospital stay and incidence of major adverse outcomes. Results Of the articles reviewed a total of six randomized controlled trials (RCT) and seven non-randomized observational studies (NRSI) were included in the review. Across studies, 1,732 patients were enrolled. The quality of the RCTs was mostly high, while the quality of the NRSTs was low, primarily due to issues related to blinding of assessors. Two studies showed higher hemoglobin with iron therapy, and only one study showed significant differences in multiple outcomes such as transfusion and morbidity. Hospital stay was reported in 4 studies and averaged 9 days. Conclusion Our results showed benefits of preoperative intravenous iron administration in reducing the likelihood of allogeneic blood transfusion and providing a modest increase a modest increase in hemoglobin concentration in anemic patients undergoing caridac surgery.

Evaluating Preoperative Intravenous Iron and Erythropoietin Treatment and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Anemia is more common in cardiac surgery patients than in other people. Severe anemia before cardiac surgery strongly predicts blood transfusion. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of Intravenous (IV) iron and erythropoietin (EPO) injection preoperatively in anemic patients waiting for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This cross-sectional study was performed between May to December 2020 at Masih Daneshvari hospital in Tehran, Iran. Anemia was described according to the WHO definition (Hb < 130 g/L in men). The study was designed in two groups of men CABG patients. Hematocrit level, platelet count, partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, prothrombin time before surgery, red blood cells (RBCs) transfusion, as well as plasma and platelet units' transfusion during surgery and at the time of hospitalization were obtained from patient's files. The length of stay in the hospital and the consequences, including infection, stroke and heart attack, and mortality, were also obtained from the patient's files and recorded in the checklists. Pearson's chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, independent samples t-test, univariate logistic regression, and odds ratio (OR) were used. All statistical analyses were performed by the SPSS software version 21. The significance level in this study was considered 0.05. In this study, the data of 64 patients were gathered, among whom 16 (25%) were injected with IV iron and EPO, and the remaining 48 (75%) did not receive any medications for stimulating erythropoiesis. The mean age of patients was 64.05 ± 8.21 years, with an age range of 51 - 91 years. Infection (P = 0.258) and mortality rate (P = 0.440) in the two groups of injection and non-injection did not show a statistically significant difference. The duration of the clamp at the time of surgery (r = 0.699, P = 0.001) and the duration of hospitalization (r = 0.399, P = 0.023) had statistically significant positive relationships with the pump duration. Red blood cell consumption in the injection and non-injection groups was 2.50 ± 2.07 and 2.90 ± 1.80 (P = 0.469), respectively. Infection (P = 0.258), mortality rate (P = 0.440), and RBC utilization (P = 0.469) in the two groups of injection and non-injection were not significantly different.

Iron Deficiency Anemia in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Is Preoperative Intravenous Iron Infusion Indicated? A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Iron deficiency anemia is the most common extraintestinal symptom in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Inflammation associated with malignancy leads to functional iron deficiency via the hepcidin pathway, whereas chronic blood loss causes absolute iron deficiency and depletion of iron stores. The assessment and treatment of preoperative anemia is of great importance in patients with CRC, since published data have consistently shown that preoperative anemia is associated with increased need for perioperative blood transfusions and more postoperative complications. Recent studies have documented mixed results regarding the preoperative intravenous iron administration in anemic CRC patients in terms of efficacy for anemia correction, cost-effectiveness, need for transfusions and risk for postoperative complications.

Ferric carboxymaltose infusion versus oral iron supplementation for preoperative iron deficiency anaemia in patients with colorectal cancer (FIT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

A third of patients with colorectal cancer who are eligible for surgery in high-income countries have concomitant anaemia associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to compare the efficacy of preoperative intravenous and oral iron supplementation in patients with colorectal cancer and iron deficiency anaemia. In the FIT multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, adult patients (aged 18 years or older) with M0 stage colorectal cancer scheduled for elective curative resection and iron deficiency anaemia (defined as haemoglobin level of less than 7·5 mmol/L (12 g/dL) for women and less than 8 mmol/L (13 g/dL) for men, and a transferrin saturation of less than 20%) were randomly assigned to either 1-2 g of ferric carboxymaltose intravenously or three tablets of 200 mg of oral ferrous fumarate daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with normalised haemoglobin levels before surgery (≥12 g/dL for women and ≥13 g/dL for men). An intention-to-treat analysis was done for the primary analysis. Safety was analysed in all patients who received treatment. The trial was registered at ClincalTrials.gov, NCT02243735, and has completed recruitment. Between Oct 31, 2014, and Feb 23, 2021, 202 patients were included and assigned to intravenous (n=96) or oral (n=106) iron treatment. Treatment began a median of 14 days (IQR 11-22) before surgery for intravenous iron and 19 days (IQR 13-27) for oral iron. Normalisation of haemoglobin at day of admission was reached in 14 (17%) of 84 patients treated intravenously and 15 (16%) of 97 patients treated orally (relative risk [RR] 1·08 [95% CI 0·55-2·10]; p=0·83), but the proportion of patients with normalised haemoglobin significantly increased for the intravenous treatment group at later timepoints (49 [60%] of 82 vs 18 [21%] of 88 at 30 days; RR 2·92 [95% CI 1·87-4·58]; p<0·0001). The most prevalent treatment-related adverse event was discoloured faeces (grade 1) after oral iron treatment (14 [13%] of 105), and no treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths were observed in either group. No differences in other safety outcomes were seen, and the most common serious adverse events were anastomotic leakage (11 [5%] of 202), aspiration pneumonia (5 [2%] of 202), and intra-abdominal abscess (5 [2%] 202). Normalisation of haemoglobin before surgery was infrequent with both treatment regimens, but significantly improved at all other timepoints following intravenous iron treatment. Restoration of iron stores was feasible only with intravenous iron. In selected patients, surgery might be delayed to augment the effect of intravenous iron on haemoglobin normalisation. Vifor Pharma.

Perioperative Tracking of Intravenous Iron in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Center Pilot Trial.

Preoperative intravenous iron administration is a frequently used patient blood management procedure. If the timeframe of intravenous iron administration before surgery is short, (1) the concentration of the intravenous iron compound might still be high in patients' plasma when undergoing surgery and (2) this iron in patients' plasma is at risk to be lost due to blood loss. The aim of the current study was, therefore, to track the iron compound ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) before, during, and after cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, with an emphasis on intraoperative iron losses in shed blood and potential recovery through autologous cell salvage. Concentrations of FCM were analyzed in patients' blood using a hyphenation of liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to distinguish between pharmaceutical compound FCM and serum iron. In this prospective, single-center pilot trial, 13 anemic and 10 control patients were included. Anemic patients with hemoglobin levels ≤12/13 g/dL in women and men were treated with 500 milligrams (mg) intravenous FCM 12 to 96 hours before elective on-pump cardiac surgery. Patients' blood samples were collected before surgery and at days 0, 1, 3, and 7 after surgery. One sample each was taken of the cardiopulmonary bypass, the autologous red blood cell concentrate generated by cell salvage, and the cell salvage disposal bag. Patients who had received FCM <48 hours before surgery had higher FCM serum levels (median [Q1-Q3], 52.9 [13.0-91.6]) compared to ≥48 hours (2.1 [0.7-5.1] µg/mL, P = .008). Of 500-mg FCM administered <48 hours, 327.37 (257.96-402.48) mg were incorporated compared to administration ≥48 hours with 493.60 (487.78-496.70) mg. After surgery, patients' plasma FCM concentration in the FCM <48 hours group was decreased (-27.1 [-30 to -5.9] µg/mL). Little FCM was found in the cell salvage disposal bag (<48 hours, 4.2 [3.0-25.8] µg/mL, equivalent to 29.0 [19.0-40.7] mg total; equivalent to 5.8% or 1/17th of the 500 mg FCM initially administered), almost none in the autologous red blood cell concentrate (<48 hours, 0.1 [0.0-0.43] µg/mL). The data generate the hypotheses that nearly all FCM is incorporated into iron stores with administration ≥48 hours before surgery. When FCM is given <48 hours of surgery, the majority is incorporated into iron stores by the time of surgery, although a small amount may be lost during surgical bleeding with limited recovery by cell salvage.

Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles and Values as Illustrated by the Case of Patient Blood Management.

Evidence-based medicine is considered 1 of the 15 great inventions in medicine. It aims to remove bias in medical decision-making as much as possible through a rigorous process. In this article, the principles of evidence-based medicine are illustrated using the case of patient blood management (PBM). Acute or chronic bleeding, iron deficiency, and renal and oncological diseases may lead to preoperative anemia. To compensate for severe and life-threatening blood loss during surgery, doctors transfuse red blood cells (RBCs). PBM is an approach to take care of patients at risk for anemia, which includes detecting and treating anemia before surgery. Alternative interventions to treat preoperative anemia are the use of iron supplementation with or without erythro-stimulating agents (ESAs). The best available scientific evidence today indicates that preoperative intravenous (IV) or oral iron monotherapy may not be effective to reduce RBC utilization (low-certainty evidence). Preoperative IV iron supplementation in addition to ESAs is probably effective to reduce RBC utilization (moderate-certainty evidence), whereas oral iron supplementation in addition to ESAs may be effective to reduce RBC utilization (low-certainty evidence). The adverse events of preoperative oral/IV iron and/or ESAs and their impact on patient-important outcomes (morbidity, mortality, quality of life) remain unclear (very low-certainty evidence). Since PBM is a patient-centered approach, emphasis on monitoring and evaluation of patient-important outcomes in future research is urgently needed. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of preoperative oral/IV iron monotherapy is unproven, whereas preoperative oral/IV iron in addition to ESAs is extremely cost-ineffective.

Preoperative Intravenous Iron Treatment in Colorectal Cancer: Experience From Clinical Practice.

Anemia is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality in abdominal surgery. In clinical trials, preoperative i.v. iron treatment increases the preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) concentration but the effect on transfusion rates are not consistent. This study reports on the experience with preoperative i.v. iron treatment in surgical colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in clinical practice. A registry-based cohort study. Surgical colorectal cancer patients with iron deficiency anemia were compared after division into two groups; those who preoperatively received i.v. iron treatment and those who did not. Primary outcomes were preoperative changes in Hb and the difference in perioperative red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) rates. Postoperative complications and mortality rates were analyzed and a descriptive analysis on what triggered blood transfusions were performed. A total of 170 patients were included. Of these, 122 had received preoperative i.v. iron treatment and 48 had not. The perioperative transfusion rate was 45% (55/122) in the treatment group and 40% (19/48) in the control group (non-significant difference). The preoperative changes in Hb levels were not different between the two groups. Transfusion practice appeared more liberal and preceded by higher Hb levels that was guided by the National transfusion guideline. I.v. iron treated patients had a higher rate of postoperative complications. No differences were found on length of stay (LOS) or postoperative mortality. Preoperative i.v. iron treatment was neither associated with a rise in Hb concentrations at the time of surgery, nor with a reduction in the likelihood of receiving perioperative red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with iron deficiency anemia.

Perioperative changes in haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations from preoperative intravenous iron isomaltoside for iron deficiency anaemia in patients with colorectal cancer: A pilot randomised controlled trial.

BackgroundPatients with colorectal cancer have a high risk of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) due to chronic tumour induced blood loss, a reduced dietary iron intake from poor nutrition or gastrointestinal malabsorption. This pilot, double blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT) examined the effect and feasibility of using preoperative iron isomaltoside for treating iron deficiency anaemia.MethodsForty eligible adults with IDA were randomised to receive either intravenous iron isomaltoside (20 mg.kg-1 up to 1000 mg over 30 minutes) or usual preoperative care (control) three weeks before scheduled colorectal surgery. The primary outcomes were perioperative changes in haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations.ResultsThe recruitment rate was 78% of all eligible referred patients (1.9 patients/month). The haemoglobin and ferritin concentrations were higher in the iron isomaltoside group than the control group over the perioperative period (group*time interaction P = 0.042 and P < 0.001 respectively). Mean haemoglobin change from baseline to before surgery was higher in the iron isomaltoside group (7.8, 95% CI: 3.2 to 12.3 g.l-1) than the control group (1.7, 95% CI: -1.9 to 5.3 g.l-1) [mean difference 6.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 11.8 g.l-1; P = 0.040]. The ferritin change from baseline to before surgery between groups was large in favour of the iron isomaltoside group (mean difference 296.9, 95% CI: 200.6 to 393.2 μg.l-1; P < 0.001]. There were no differences between groups in packed red blood cell transfusions needed, surgical complications, quality of recovery and days (alive and) at home within 30 days after surgery.ConclusionIron isomaltoside therapy was safe and had a minimal effect on perioperative changes in haemoglobin concentration. Given the slow recruitment and new evidence emerging during the conduct of this study, conducting a multi-centre RCT based on the current pilot trial protocol is unlikely to be feasible.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03565354.

Management of Perioperative Anemia in Patients that Performed Abdominal Major Surgery.

Introduction: Anemia is a recognized predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients during abdominal major surgery. The management of perioperative anemia involves many strategies. Pre-operative anemia has adverse outcomes in major surgery and is called the fourth factor. Anemia was then classified into mild, moderate, and severe depending on hemoglobin level. It is present almost in 40% of patients that performed elective major surgery. Patients with preoperative anemia are associated with an increased rate of blood transfusion together with a risk for high morbidity and mortality. The most usual cause of preoperative anemia is iron deficiency, which can be treated with oral/intravenous iron depending on the time scheduled for surgery. A review concluded that anemia recovery earlier with preoperative intravenous iron than with oral iron supplement. A perioperative erythropoietin injection is also a reasonable approach for patients with hemoglobin between 10 and 13 g/dL and if autologous blood donation is performed. The protocol requires a baseline complete blood count and iron studies and all patients should receive iron supplementation during erythropoietin therapy. The next strategy is stabilized macro/ microcirculation to optimize the patient´s tolerance to bleeding. Recent recommendation, in general, suggests no bridging therapy consider it only if high thrombotic risk. Finally, targeted surgery should be used to reduce intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. We recommend a restrictive transfusion strategy. Allogeneic blood transfusion is associated with an increased incidence of nosocomial infections. Postoperative anemia must be treated with the use of intravenous iron. We ought to know fresh frozen plasma used in deficit in factor V, XI, in dose 15-30ml/kg and be aware of its complications as immunomodulation, acute lung injury, and cardiac overload.&#x0D; Conclusion: Our goal is to improve patients´ clinical outcomes.

Re: Preoperative Intravenous Iron to Treat Anaemia Before Major Abdominal Surgery (PREVENTT): A Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

Re: Preoperative Intravenous Iron to Treat Anaemia Before Major Abdominal Surgery (PREVENTT): A Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

Preoperative intravenous iron treatment reduces postoperative complications and postoperative anemia in preoperatively anemic patients with colon carcinoma

PurposeAnemia is common among patients with colorectal cancer and is associated with an increased risk of complications and poorer survival rate. The main objective of our study was to determine the effect of preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy on the need for red blood cell transfusions, other postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay in colon cancer patients undergoing colon resection.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from medical records of all 549 colon carcinoma patients who underwent a colon resection in Helsinki University Hospital during the years 2017 and 2018. The patients were divided into two cohorts: one with anemic patients treated with preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy (180 patients) and one with anemic patients without preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy (138 patients). Non-anemic patients and patients requiring emergency surgery were excluded (231 patients).ResultsPatients treated with intravenous iron had less postoperative complications (33.9% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.045) and a lower prevalence of anemia at 1 month after surgery (38.7% vs. 65.3%, p < 0.01) when compared with patients without preoperative iv iron treatment. No difference was found in the amount of red blood cell transfusions, length of stay, or mortality between the groups.ConclusionThis is the first study demonstrating a significant decrease in postoperative complications in anemic colon cancer patients receiving preoperative intravenous iron supplementation therapy. This treatment also diminishes the rate of postoperative anemia, which is often associated with a facilitated recovery.

The dynamic effects of preoperative intravenous iron in anaemic patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to describe the dynamic changes in blood work following individual adjusted dosage of intravenously administered iron(III) isomaltoside in a 4-week period prior to surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. This was a single-centre, observational cohort study with prospectively collected data, including patients with colorectal cancer receiving preoperative treatment with iron(III) isomaltoside. Blood samples were taken at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after initial treatment. Sixty-two patients were included in the study. Sixty-two patients were included for final analysis. The mean increase in haemoglobin was 0.77g/dl (95% CI 0.52-1.03 g/dl, P<0.0001) at week 1, 1.5g/dl (95% CI 1.21-1.80 g/dl, P<0.0001) at week 2 and 2.13g/dl (95% CI 1.71-2.55 g/dl, P<0.0001) at week 4. Patients with severe anaemia (<9.02g/dl) showed the largest increase in haemoglobin during the treatment course (2.92g/dl, 95% CI 2.27-3.58g/dl, P<0.0001). Patients with mild anaemia (>10.31g/dl) did not show a significant increase (0.66g/dl, 95% CI -0.29-1.61 g/dl, P=0.17). The mean of transferrin saturation after 4 weeks was 8% (95% CI 6%-10%, P<0.0001). After intravenously administered iron, patients with severe anaemia had the most substantial increase in haemoglobin, and the increase was largest after 4 weeks. Patients with mild anaemia did not have an increase in haemoglobin during the treatment course. The vast majority of patients still had iron deficiency at surgery 4 weeks after the initial treatment.

Rationale and design of the intravenous iron for treatment of anemia before cardiac surgery trial

Background Approximately 20% to 30% of patients awaiting cardiac surgery are anemic. Anemia increases the likelihood of requiring a red cell transfusion and is associated with increased complications, intensive care, and hospital stay following surgery. Iron deficiency is the commonest cause of anemia and preoperative intravenous (IV) iron therapy thus may improve anemia and therefore patient outcome following cardiac surgery. We have initiated the intravenous iron for treatment of anemia before cardiac surgery (ITACS) Trial to test the hypothesis that in patients with anemia awaiting elective cardiac surgery, IV iron will reduce complications, and facilitate recovery after surgery. Methods ITACS is a 1,000 patient, international randomized trial in patients with anemia undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The patients, health care providers, data collectors, and statistician are blinded to whether patients receive IV iron 1,000 mg, or placebo, at 1-26 weeks before their planned date of surgery. The primary endpoint is the number of days alive and at home up to 90 days after surgery. Results To date, ITACS has enrolled 615 patients in 30 hospitals in 9 countries. Patient mean (SD) age is 66 (12) years, 63% are male, with a mean (SD) hemoglobin at baseline of 118 (12) g/L; 40% have evidence (ferritin <100 ng/mL and/or transferrin saturation <25%) suggestive of iron deficiency. Most (59%) patients have undergone coronary artery surgery with or without valve surgery. Conclusions The ITACS Trial will be the largest study yet conducted to ascertain the benefits and risks of IV iron administration in anemic patients awaiting cardiac surgery.