Preoperative High-resolution Manometry Research Articles

Elevated preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure predicts improved clinical outcomes after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Although per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown to be beneficial forthe treatment ofachalasia, it can be difficult to predict who will have a robust and long-lasting response. Historically, it hasbeen shownthat higher lower esophageal sphincter pressures havebeen associatedwith poorer responses to alternative endoscopic therapies such as Botox therapy and pneumatic dilation. This studywas designedto evaluate if modern preoperative manometric data could similarly predict response totherapyafter POEM. This was a retrospective study of 237 patients who underwent POEM at a single institution over a period of 13years (2011-2023) and who had a high-resolution manometry performed preoperativelyandan Eckardt symptom score performed both preoperative and postoperatively. The achalasia type and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) were tested for potential correlation with the need for any further achalasia interventions postoperativelyaswell asthe degree of Eckardt score reduction using a linear regression model. The Achalasia type on preoperative manometry was not predictive for further interventions or degree of Eckardt score reduction (p = 0.76 and 0.43, respectively). A higher IRP was not predictive of the need forfurtherinterventions, however, it was predictive of agreaterreduction in postoperative Eckardt scores (p = 0.03)asshown by the non-zero regression slope. In this study, achalasia type was not a predictive factor in the need for further interventions or the degree of symptom relief.Although IRPwas not predictive ofthe need for further interventions, a higher IRPdid predictbetter symptomatic relief postoperatively.This result is opposite that of other endoscopic treatment modalities (Botox and pneumatic dilation). Therefore, patients with higher IRP on preoperative high-resolution manometry would likely benefit from POEMwhichprovides significant symptomatic relief postoperatively.

Role of Preoperative High-Resolution Manometry in the Identification of Patients at High Risk of Postoperative GERD Symptoms 1 Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most common bariatric procedure, but it is often characterized by the onset of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). High-resolution manometry (HRM) is a useful tool to detect risk factors for GERD. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative manometric parameters as possible predictors of postoperative GERD. This was a monocentric retrospective study. We analyzed 164 patients, with preoperative esophagitis/GERD symptoms who underwent preoperative HRM and were submitted to SG (July 2020-February 2022). Postoperative GERD was observed in 60 patients (36.6%): 41 of them (68%) already had preoperative GERD symptoms, whereas the remaining 19 patients (32%) developed postoperative symptoms. Female patients developed postoperative GERD in a significantly higher fraction of cases as compared to male patients (82% versus 18%; p < 0.001). DCI (distal contractile integral) was identified as the only HRM parameter correlating with the presence of GERD. Patients with DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*cm*s developed postoperative GERD in 46% of cases (n = 43/94), as compared to 24% of cases (n = 17/70) among patients with DCI > 1623 mmHg*cm*s (p = 0.005). At multivariable analysis, female sex (OR 3.402, p = 0.002), preoperative GERD symptoms (OR 2.489, p = 0.013), and DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*s*cm (OR 0.335, p = 0.003) were identified as independent determinants of postoperative GERD. All the patients with preoperative risk factors for reflux, such as GERD symptoms or esophagitis on EGDS (esophagogastroduodenoscopy), should be considered for an HRM. Moreover, when a DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*s*cm is found, a bariatric procedure different from SG might be considered.

Abnormal response after multiple rapid swallow provocation is not predictive of post-operative dysphagia following a tailored fundoplication approach.

The aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of multiple rapid swallows (MRS) during high-resolution manometry (HRM) prior to fundoplication. Despite pre-operative HRM, up to 38% of patients report post-fundoplication dysphagia. Suggestion that MRS improves prediction of dysphagia after fundoplication has not been investigated when using a tailored approach. We hypothesize response to MRS is predictive of dysphagia after tailored fundoplication. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing HRM with MRS provocation 5/2019-7/2021 at a single institution. Patients who underwent subsequent index laparoscopic fundoplication, without peptic stricture or achalasia, were included. After performing standard 10-swallow HRM, MRS provocation was performed. Patient-reported dysphagia frequency scores were collected at initial consultation and post-operative follow-up. At least weekly symptoms were considered clinically significant. Normal MRS response was defined as adequate deglutitive inhibition and MRS contractile response. Fundoplications were tailored based on standard HRM values. HRM was performed in 1201 patients, 220 met inclusion criteria. Clinically significant pre-operative dysphagia was reported by 85 (38.6%). Patients undergoing partial fundoplication (n = 123, 55.9%) had lower mean distal contractile integer, distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and percent peristalsis (p < 0.005). Post-operatively, 120 (54.5%) were without dysphagia, 59 (26.8%) had improved dysphagia, 26 (11.8%) had unchanged dysphagia, and 15 (6.8%) reported new dysphagia. There was no statistical difference in early or late dysphagia outcome between tailored fundoplication groups (p = 0.69). On univariate and multivariate analysis, neither MRS response, nor standard HRM metrics were significantly associated with post-operative dysphagia. Younger age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.986, p = 0.042) and the presence of pre-operative dysphagia (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.17-5.65, p = 0.015) were significant predictors of post-operative dysphagia. The risk of clinically significant dysphagia post-fundoplication is low when using a tailored approach based on standard HRM metrics. Additional data provided by MRS does not add to surgical decision-making using the investigated approach.

Accuracy of High-Resolution Manometry in Hiatal Hernia Diagnosis in Primary and Revision Bariatric Surgery.

There is a complex association between obesity, hiatal hernia (HH), and reflux. There is a deficiency of literature on the accuracy of preoperative high-resolution manometry (HRM) in detecting HH before both primary and revision bariatric surgery. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all HRM performed before bariatric surgery from 2014 to 2019. An electronic medical records review was conducted. Sensitivity, specificity, and global diagnostic test accuracy were calculated. Sixty-seven patients with HRM (mean age of 44.0 ± 11.3 years, body mass index 40.8 ± 6.9 kg/m2) were eligible. Intraoperative diagnosis of HH was made in 37 patients (55.2% prevalence). The HRM sensitivity was 48.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 31.9-65.6%), specificity 90.0% (95% CI 73.5-97.9%), and accuracy was 67.2% (95% CI 54.6-78.2%). Comparing primary (28) and revision (39) surgery, the sensitivity (37.5% vs 57.1%), specificity (75.0% vs 100%), and diagnostic accuracy (54.3% vs 76.3%) were comparable, with overlapping 95% CI. Endoscopy performed in 30 patients had a sensitivity of 25.5% (95% CI 6.8-49.9%), specificity of 100% (95% CI 75.3-100%), and accuracy of 57.8% (95% CI 38.5-75.5%) and was comparable to HRM. High-resolution manometry for the detection of HH before bariatric surgery has a high specificity and maintains a high accuracy in both primary and revision bariatric surgery.

Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Dor Fundoplication on Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Scleroderma.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disease that affects the gastrointestinal tract resulting in its atrophy and fibrosis of smooth muscles. Approximately 80% of SSc patients develop both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dysphagia. The nocturnal GERD can cause regurgitation and aspiration, which can further aggravate the pulmonary fibrosis from SSc. Also, their dysphagia is further worsened by performing standard Nissen fundoplication. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether Dor fundoplication (a 180° anterior wrap) can reduce nocturnal heartburn and regurgitation without worsening dysphagia in patients with SSc and severe GERD. Five SSc patients with drug-refractory severe GERD underwent a Dor fundoplication procedure with a median follow-up of 2 years (range: 1-5 years). In all 5 patients, the preoperative high-resolution manometry showed significant impairment of esophageal motility. Patients were interviewed postoperatively to assess for nocturnal and diurnal GERD symptoms, treatment response, the status of dysphagia, and adverse effects of surgery. The average age of 5 patients was 50 years and all were females. Four of the 5 patients (80%) reported 90% improvement in both diurnal and nocturnal GERD symptoms since surgery, with no nocturnal reflux, heartburn, or regurgitation, and reports to sleep at night without requiring any more pillows or wedges. About 50% of patients reported a decrease in their proton pump inhibitor dosage after surgery compared to before surgery. No surgical complication was reported and specifically, no worsening of dysphagia. The Dor fundoplication performed for refractory GERD in SSc patients substantially decreases heartburn and regurgitation, primarily nocturnal, without affecting dysphagia, thus improving the quality of life.

2872 Efficacy of Robotic Dor Fundoplication on Severe Nocturnal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Scleroderma

INTRODUCTION: Scleroderma is a systemic disease and its effect on the GI tract is atrophy and replacement fibrosis of the smooth muscles. The esophagus is invariably involved and approximately eighty percent of patients with scleroderma develop both gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dysphagia. The nocturnal GERD can lead to regurgitation and aspiration which further worsens the pulmonary fibrosis from scleroderma. Performing the standard fundoplication would worsen their dysphagia. Aim- Our goal was to investigate whether a Dor fundoplication (a 270-degree anterior wrap) can reduce nocturnal heartburn and regurgitation without worsening of the dysphagia in patients with scleroderma and severe GERD. METHODS: 5 scleroderma patients with drug refractory severe GERD underwent Dor fundoplication procedure (Figure 1) with a median follow up of 18 months. All had undergone a preoperative high-resolution manometry documenting very impaired esophageal motility. Patients were interviewed post operatively and were assessed for nocturnal and diurnal GERD symptoms and treatment response, status of dysphagia and adverse effects of surgery. RESULTS: All 5 patients were female with average age 50 years (range 36-65). 4 of the 5 patients (80%) reported 90% improvement in both diurnal and nocturnal GERD symptoms since surgery, they no longer suffered from nocturnal reflux, heart burn or regurgitation and that they are able to sleep well at night without requiring any more pillows or wedges. 50% of patients reported decrease in their proton pump inhibitor dosage after surgery compared to before surgery. There was no surgical complication reported and specifically no worsening of dysphagia. 100% of the patients were able to belch, burp better effectively after surgery. 4 out of 5 patients reported that they would strongly recommend this surgery to another scleroderma patient suffering from drug refractory GERD symptoms. In one patient, there was no change in symptoms after the surgery but no worsening of dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Robotic Dor fundoplication is very effective in drug refractory GERD secondary to scleroderma dominated by nocturnal regurgitation. This procedure resulted in significant symptom reduction in 80% of our patient group which in turn improved their quality of life and nocturnal sleep without affecting dysphagia.

Hiatal hernia diagnosis prospectively assessed in obese patients before bariatric surgery: accuracy of high-resolution manometry taking intraoperative diagnosis as reference standard.

Hiatal hernia (HH) is common in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Preoperative traditional techniques such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) or barium swallow/esophagram do not always correlate with intraoperative findings. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has shown a higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional techniques in non-obese patients in the HH diagnosis, whereas there is a lack of data in the morbidly obese population. We aimed to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of HRM in HH detection, in comparison with barium swallow and UGIE, assuming intraoperative diagnosis as a standard of reference. Forty-one consecutive morbidly obese patients prospectively recruited from a tertiary-care referral hospital devoted to bariatric and metabolic surgery underwent a preoperative evaluation including standardized GERD questionnaires, barium swallow, UGIE, and HRM. The surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was blinded to the results of other investigations. HH was intraoperatively diagnosed in 11/41 patients (26.8%). In 10/11 patients, the preoperative HRM showed an esophagogastric junction suggestive of HH. When compared to intraoperative evaluation, the sensitivity of the HRM was 90.9% and the specificity 63.3%, with a positive predictive value of 47.6% and a negative predictive value of 95.0%. HRM showed a higher sensitivity and specificity compared to barium swallow and UGIE. HRM has a high accuracy of HH detection in morbidly obese patients assuming an intraoperative diagnosis as reference standard. It could therefore be a very useful tool in the preoperative work-up of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Reintervention After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: Is It Inevitable?

Few studies of reintervention after Heller myotomy for achalasia set patients' expectations, assist therapeutic decision making, and direct follow-up. Therefore, we investigated the frequency and type of symptoms and reinterventions after myotomy based on achalasia type. From January 2006 to March 2013, 248 patients who had preoperative high-resolution manometry and a timed barium esophagram (TBE) underwent Heller myotomy, 62 (25%) for type I, 162 (65%) for type II, and 24 (10%) for type III achalasia. Postoperative surveillance, including TBE, was performed at 8 weeks, then annually. Median follow-up was 36 months. End points were all symptom types and modes of reintervention, endoscopic or surgical. Reintervention was based on both symptoms and objective TBE measurements. Eventually most patients (169 of 218; 69%) experienced at least one symptom after myotomy. Fifty patients underwent 85 reinterventions, 41 endoscopic only, 4 surgical only, and 5 both. Five-year freedom from reintervention was 62% for type I, 74% for type II, and 87% for type III, most occurring within 6 months, although later in type III. At 5 years, number of reinterventions per 100 patients was 72 for type I, 51 for type II, and 13 for type III. After each reintervention, there was approximately a 50% chance of another within 2 years. Patients' expectations when undergoing Heller myotomy for achalasia must be that symptoms will only be palliated, and patients who have worse esophageal function-achalasia type I-may require one or more postoperative reinterventions. Thus, we recommend that patients with achalasia have lifelong annual surveillance after Heller myotomy that includes TBE.

Clinical factors and high-resolution manometry predicting response to surgery for achalasia in children

BackgroundEsophageal achalasia is an uncommon condition in children. Although many interventions exist for the management of this disorder, esophageal (Heller) myotomy offers one of the most durable treatments. Our institution sought to review patients undergoing Heller myotomy concentrating on preoperative clinical factors that might predict postoperative outcomes. Materials and methodsAll patients from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2016, who underwent surgical treatment for achalasia at our tertiary pediatric hospital were identified and included in the study cohort. Electronic medical records for these patients were reviewed for clinical presentation variables, nonsurgical preoperative treatment, surgical approach, clinical response to surgery, need for postoperative treatment for ongoing symptoms, and high-resolution manometry (HRM) data. ResultsTwenty-six patients were included in the study, and all underwent myotomy with partial fundoplication (median age: 14.4 y [interquartile range 11.6-15.5]). At a median follow-up of 9.75 mo (interquartile range 3.5-21 mo), 16 (61.5%) patients reported good resolution of their dysphagia symptoms with surgery alone. Two patients (7.7%) had perforation of the gastrointestinal tract requiring surgical intervention. Eight patients (30.8%) required additional treatment for achalasia, with 5 (19.2%) of these undergoing additional surgery or endoscopic treatment. Patients who had preoperative dilation did not have good resolution of their dysphagia (n = 2; P = 0.037). Two of four patients undergoing postoperative dilation had preoperative dilation. None of these patients underwent preoperative manometry. There was a statistically significant difference in the ages of patients who required postoperative intervention and those who did not (14.1 versus 15.2 y old, respectively; P = 0.043). In patients who reported improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease/reflux type symptoms after Heller myotomy, lower esophageal residual pressure (29.1 versus 18.7 mmHg; P = 0.018) on preoperative HRM was significantly higher than in those who did not report improvement after surgery. Higher upper esophageal mean pressure (66.6 versus 47.8 mmHg; P = 0.05) also predicted good gastroesophageal reflux disease/reflux symptom response in a similar manner. ConclusionsCurrent analysis suggests that preoperative dilation should be used cautiously and older patients may have a better response to surgery without need for postoperative treatment. In addition, preoperative HRM can aid in counseling patients in the risk of ongoing symptoms after surgery and may aid in determining if a fundoplication should be completed at the index procedure. Further research is needed to delineate these factors. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Abnormal High-Resolution Manometry Findings and Outcomes after Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

Abnormal esophageal peristalsis diagnosed by high-resolution manometry is frequently found as part of the preoperative evaluation of patients with paraesophageal hernia (PEH). Currently, the clinical relevance of these findings is largely unknown. From 2013 to 2016, two hundred and twelve patients undergoing PEH repair were prospectively recorded in an IRB-approved database. Preoperative high-resolution manometry was available for reanalysis according to the latest Chicago Classification (version 3.0) in 200 patients. Outcomes in patients with abnormal motility (AM) were compared with patients with normal motility (NM). Abnormal motility was documented in 106 (53%) patients. Abnormal motility was associated with older age (72 vs 69 years) and increased age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (both, p= 0.04). Compared with preoperative symptoms, postoperative retrosternal pain in AM vs NM patients went from 79% to 5% vs 75% to 2%, regurgitation from 52% to 2% vs 59% to 0%, and dysphagia from 56% to 7% vs 67% to 7%. An esophagogram was performed at a median of 4 months and 3.5 months postoperatively. Postoperative reflux in AM vs NM went from 54% to 21% vs 57% to 16%, and abnormal esophageal motility, visually assessed during the esophagogram, was stable (52% to 56% vs 41% to 48% for AM vs NM, respectively). Patients found to have AM according to the Chicago classification before surgical repair of PEH demonstrated similar symptomatic improvement compared with patients with NM. Selective motility disorders diagnosed by preoperative high-resolution manometry should not preclude surgical repair of giant PEHs.

The role of preoperative high resolution manometry in predicting dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Laparoscopic fundoplication is an accepted surgical management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). The use of high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) in preoperative evaluation is often applied to determine the degree of fundoplication to optimize reflux control while minimizing adverse sequela of postoperative dysphagia. Assess the role of preoperative HRM in predicting surgical outcomes, specifically risk assessment of postoperative dysphagia and quality of life, among patients receiving laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for GERD with immediate postoperative (< 4 weeks clinic), short-term (3-month clinic), and long-term (34 ± 10.4 months of telephone) follow-up. Retrospective analysis of 146 patients over the age of 18 who received laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at University of Vermont Medical Center from July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2014 was completed, of which 52 patients with preoperative HRM met inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria included history of: (a) named esophageal motility disorder or aperistalsis; (b) esophageal cancer; (c) paraesophageal hernia noted intraoperatively. Elevated basal integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), which is the mean of 4 s of maximal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation within 10s of swallowing, was significantly correlated with worsened severity of post-fundoplication dysphagia (r = 0.572, p < 0.0001 with sensitivity and NPV of 100%) and poorer quality of life (r = 0.348, p = 0.018) at up to 3-years follow-up. The presence of preoperative dysphagia was independently related to post-fundoplication dysphagia at short-term (r = 0.403, p = 0.018) and long-term follow-up (r = 0.415, p = 0.005). Also, both elevated mean wave amplitude (r=-0.397, p = 0.006) and distal contractile integral (DCI) (r = - 0.294, p = 0.047) were significantly, inversely correlated to post-Nissen dysphagia. No significant association was demonstrated between other preoperative HRM parameters and surgical outcomes. Inadequacy of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation with swallowing as delineated by elevated IRP is significantly predictive of worse long-term postoperative outcomes including dysphagia and quality of life scores. Further assessment of tailoring anti-reflux surgical approach with partial vs. total fundoplication to functionally resistant LES is required.

Tu1293 - Preoperative High Resolution Manometry Criteria does not Predict Dysphagia after Nissen Fundoplication

Tu1293 - Preoperative High Resolution Manometry Criteria does not Predict Dysphagia after Nissen Fundoplication

Effects of laparoscopic myotomy on the esophageal motility pattern of esophageal achalasia as measured by high-resolution manometry.

Esophageal achalasia can be classified on the grounds of three distinct manometric patterns that correlate well with final outcome after laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy (LHM). No analytical data are available, however, on the postoperative picture and its possible correlation with final outcome. The aims of this study were: (a) to investigate whether manometric patterns change after LHM for achalasia; (b) to ascertain whether postoperative patterns and/or changes can predict final outcome; and (c) to test the hypothesis that the three known patterns represent different stages in the evolution of the disease. During the study period, we prospectively enlisted 206 consecutive achalasia patients who were assessed using high-resolution manometry (HRM) before undergoing LHM. Symptoms were scored using a detailed questionnaire. Barium swallow, endoscopy and HRM were performed, before and again 6months after surgery. Preoperative HRM revealed the three known patterns with statistically different esophageal diameters (pattern I having the largest), and patients with pattern I had the highest symptom scores. The surgical treatment failed in 10 cases (4.9%). The only predictor of final outcome was the preoperative manometric pattern (p=0.01). All patients with pattern I preoperatively had the same pattern afterward, whereas nearly 50% of patients with pattern III before LHM had patterns I or II after surgery. There were no cases showing the opposite trend. Neither a change of manometric pattern after surgery nor a patient's postoperative pattern was a predictor of final outcome, whereas preoperative pattern confirmed its prognostic significance. The three manometric patterns distinguishable in achalasia may represent different stages in the disease's evolution, pattern III and pattern I coinciding with the early and final stages of the disease, respectively.

Mo1596 High Resolution Manometric Predictors of Post-Fundoplication Dysphagia

INTRODUCTION Post-fundoplication dysphagia is a well-described side effect of antireflux surgery. Esophageal manometry is a standard part of the preoperative evaluation prior to antireflux surgery. However, controversy exists regarding the value of traditional manometry to predict post-operative dysphagia after fundoplication. Today, high-resolution manometry (HRM) has replaced traditional water perfused systems for the analysis of esophageal physiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of HRM in predicting post-operative dysphagia in patients with an otherwise functioning Nissen fundoplication. METHODS Patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at a single institution were identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients were asked to undergo routine post-operative testing 6-12 months after surgery. Patients who had normal post-operative 24-hour pH test scores were eligible for the study. Of these patients, those without available raw data from preoperative HRM were excluded. Traditional ineffective motility (IEM) was defined as mean distal esophageal contraction amplitude of <30mmHg or 30% or less peristaltic waves. Post-operative dysphagia was graded using a standard scoring system (0= never, 1=1-2 times a month, 2=1-2 times per week, 3=daily). A symptom score of 2-3 was used to define post-operative dysphagia. Regression and association analysis of pre-operative manometric risk-factors were performed to determine predictors of post-operative dysphagia. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS 95 patients (41 male; 54 female) were included in the analysis. Mean post-operative length of follow up was 14.9 months (range: 2-73). 70.2% patients had normal scores on all HRM parameters. Any dysphagia was reported by 50% of patients (17% grade-1, 23.4% grade-2, and 9.5% grade-3) Nineteen patients had traditional IEM. Of those with dysphagia, one also had traditional IEM. On univariate analysis only distal latency (DL) was found to be a significant predictor (p<0.001) of grade-3 but not grade-2 dysphagia. On multivariate analysis, no preoperative factors were found to be significant predictors of grade-3 dysphagia, but contraction front velocity predicted grade2 dysphagia. CONCLUSION Persistent daily dysphagia occurs in ~10% of patients following an otherwise successful Nissen fundoplication. Advancements in manometric technology provide additional data points in the preoperative analysis of these patients. This analysis reveals that elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is a useful new metric to predict post-operative dysphagia in addition to traditional identification of weak distal esophageal contraction amplitudes. Pre-operative factors as predictors of post-fundoplication dysphagia

Mo1597 Impedance Planimetry as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate the Degree of Clinical Lower Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION Post-fundoplication dysphagia is a well-described side effect of antireflux surgery. Esophageal manometry is a standard part of the preoperative evaluation prior to antireflux surgery. However, controversy exists regarding the value of traditional manometry to predict post-operative dysphagia after fundoplication. Today, high-resolution manometry (HRM) has replaced traditional water perfused systems for the analysis of esophageal physiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of HRM in predicting post-operative dysphagia in patients with an otherwise functioning Nissen fundoplication. METHODS Patients who underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at a single institution were identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients were asked to undergo routine post-operative testing 6-12 months after surgery. Patients who had normal post-operative 24-hour pH test scores were eligible for the study. Of these patients, those without available raw data from preoperative HRM were excluded. Traditional ineffective motility (IEM) was defined as mean distal esophageal contraction amplitude of <30mmHg or 30% or less peristaltic waves. Post-operative dysphagia was graded using a standard scoring system (0= never, 1=1-2 times a month, 2=1-2 times per week, 3=daily). A symptom score of 2-3 was used to define post-operative dysphagia. Regression and association analysis of pre-operative manometric risk-factors were performed to determine predictors of post-operative dysphagia. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS 95 patients (41 male; 54 female) were included in the analysis. Mean post-operative length of follow up was 14.9 months (range: 2-73). 70.2% patients had normal scores on all HRM parameters. Any dysphagia was reported by 50% of patients (17% grade-1, 23.4% grade-2, and 9.5% grade-3) Nineteen patients had traditional IEM. Of those with dysphagia, one also had traditional IEM. On univariate analysis only distal latency (DL) was found to be a significant predictor (p<0.001) of grade-3 but not grade-2 dysphagia. On multivariate analysis, no preoperative factors were found to be significant predictors of grade-3 dysphagia, but contraction front velocity predicted grade2 dysphagia. CONCLUSION Persistent daily dysphagia occurs in ~10% of patients following an otherwise successful Nissen fundoplication. Advancements in manometric technology provide additional data points in the preoperative analysis of these patients. This analysis reveals that elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is a useful new metric to predict post-operative dysphagia in addition to traditional identification of weak distal esophageal contraction amplitudes. Pre-operative factors as predictors of post-fundoplication dysphagia

PTU-151 High Resolution Manometry Profile of Hiatal Hernia in Patients before and after Fundoplication

IntroductionCurrent data relating to esophageal motility evaluated by high resolution manometry(HRM) in presence of hiatal hernia(HH) is equivocal. This study was aimed to compare HRM variables in patients with HH...

Diagnosis of Type-I hiatal hernia: a comparison of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy

Sliding Type-I hiatal hernia is commonly diagnosed using upper endoscopy, barium swallow or less commonly, esophageal manometry. Current data suggest that endoscopy is superior to barium swallow or esophageal manometry. Recently, high-resolution manometry has become available for the assessment of esophageal motility. This novel technology is capable of displaying spatial and topographic pressure profiles of gastroesophageal junction and crural diaphragm in real time. The objective of the current study was to compare the specificity and sensitivity of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy in the diagnosis of sliding hiatal hernia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Data were analyzed retrospectively for 83 consecutive patients (61% females, mean age 52 ± 13.2 years) with objective gastroesophageal reflux disease who were considered for laparoscopic antireflux surgery between January 2006 and January 2009 and had preoperative high-resolution manometry and endoscopy. Manometrically, hiatal hernia was defined as separation of the gastroesophageal junction >2.0 cm from the crural diaphragm. Intraoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia was used as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of a positive test and a negative test were used to compare the performance of the two diagnostic modalities. Forty-two patients were found to have a Type-I sliding hiatal hernia (>2 cm) during surgery. Twenty-two patients had manometric criteria for a hiatal hernia by high-resolution manometry, and 36 patients were described as having a hiatal hernia by preoperative endoscopy. False positive results were significantly fewer (higher specificity) with high-resolution manometry as compared with endoscopy (4.88% vs. 31.71%, P= 0.01). There were no significant differences in the false negative results (sensitivity) between the two diagnostic modalities (47.62% vs. 45.24%, P= 0.62). Analysis of likelihood ratios of a positive and negative test demonstrated that high-resolution manometry is better than endoscopy both to rule out and rule in a hiatal hernia. A significant discordance was also observed between the two tests (P= 0.033). High-resolution manometry has better specificity and ability to rule out an overt Type-I sliding hiatal hernia (greater likelihood ratio of a positive test) in patients with GERD. Because of high false negative results, both high-resolution manometry and endoscopy are unreliable for ruling in a hiatal hernia. Negative result for a hiatal hernia by either modality mandates additional testing.

Clinical outcomes of atypical extra-esophageal reflux symptoms following laparoscopic antireflux surgery

While it is well established that antireflux surgery is effective in relieving typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation, it is currently unclear whether atypical symptoms (cough, hoarseness, wheeze) foreshadow a less satisfactory outcome following laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the clinical outcomes of atypical symptoms in patients undergoing LARS. Patients scheduled for LARS for GERD were prospectively enrolled over a 7-year period; all subjects underwent preoperative high-resolution manometry (HRM) and had evidence of GERD on ambulatory pH study. Cough, wheeze, and hoarseness were considered atypical symptoms. During preoperative and postoperative examinations, patients completed detailed foregut symptomatology questionnaires, using both 5-point Likert and 10-point visual analog scales (VAS) to document typical as well as atypical symptoms. Atypical symptom burden was calculated as a sum of VAS for the three atypical symptoms, termed the atypical score (ATS). HRM patterns were grouped into normal, spastic, and hypomotile. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined using paired t-test, and analysis of variance with post hoc least significant difference (LSD). One hundred thirteen patients (age 49 ± 1.26 years, range 20-84 years, M:F 47:66) with mean follow-up of 28 ± 2.31 months (range 1-92 months) fulfilled inclusion criteria, having mean modified DeMeester score of 45.5 ± 2.78. Heartburn was noted in 84.1%, while atypical symptoms of some degree were reported by 92.0% (104 patients). Heartburn improved from a preoperative score of 7.1 ± 0.54 to 0.9 ± 0.24 after LARS, and ATS improved from 8.9 ± 0.71 to 2.2 ± 0.42. Significant improvements were noted for all atypical symptoms analyzed (p < 0.0001 for each). Improvement in atypical symptoms was least in the presence of hypomotility features on HRM (21.7% improvement), compared with normal motility (72.4%) and spastic features (83.9%). Preoperative atypical score (p < 0.0001) and esophageal hypomotility (p = 0.04) demonstrated a linear relationship with postoperative atypical score. In an unselected cohort of patients undergoing LARS, atypical GERD symptoms improved as significantly as typical symptoms. Symptom improvement was significantly lower in the presence of esophageal hypomotility and with higher symptomatic state. Therefore, patients with severe atypical symptoms or hypomotile esophagus may not achieve the same clinical satisfaction from LARS.

Value of preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery

The value of esophageal manometry and ambulatory pH monitoring before laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) has been questioned because tailoring the operation to the degree of hypomotility often is not required. This study evaluated a consecutive cohort of patients referred for esophageal function studies in preparation for LARS to determine the rates of findings that would alter surgical decisions. High-resolution manometry (HRM) was performed for each subject using a 21-lumen water-perfused system, and motor function was characterized. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was evident from ambulatory pH monitoring if thresholds for acid exposure time and/or positive symptom association probability were passed. Of 1,081 subjects (age, 48.4±0.4years; 56.7% female) undergoing preoperative HRM, 723 (66.9%) also had ambulatory pH testing performed. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) hypotension (38.9%) and nonspecific spastic disorder (NSSD) of the esophageal body (36.1%) were common. Obstructive LES pathophysiology was noted in 2.5% (achalasia in 1%; incomplete LES relaxation in 1.5%), and significant esophageal body hypomotility in 4.5% (aperistalsis in 3.2%; severe hypomotility in 1.3%) of the subjects. Evidence of GERD was absent in 23.9% of the subjects. Spastic disorders were more frequent in the absence of GERD (43.9% vs. 23.1% with GERD; p<0.0001), whereas hypomotility and normal patterns were more common with GERD. Findings considered absolute or relative contraindications for standard 360º fundoplication are detected in 1 of 14 patients receiving preoperative HRM. Additionally, spastic findings associated with persistent postoperative symptoms are detected at esophageal function testing that could be used in preoperative counseling and candidate selection. Physiologic testing remains important in the preoperative evaluation of patients being considered for LARS.