Preoperative Geriatric Assessment Research Articles

Relevance of Preoperative Cognitive Impairment for Predicting Postoperative Delirium in Surgical Medicine: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Post-operative delirium is a dreaded complication after surgery in older patients. The identification of risk factors for delirium and comprehensive geriatric assessment is an extensive part of recent research. However, the preoperative assessment of risk factors, such as impaired cognition, is frequently not standardized. Methods: A comprehensive preoperative assessment was performed in 421 surgical patients to investigate the impact of preoperative cognitive impairment (PCI) on the risk of delirium and to evaluate appropriate screening tools (Six-item screener (SIS) and clock-drawing test (CDT)). Results: Both screening tools showed a significantly increased risk of delirium with p < 0.001 (OR 12.5, 95% [6.42; 24.4]) in SIS and p = 0.042 (OR 2.02, 95%CI [1.02; 4.03]) in CDT for existing cognitive impairment. A higher level of care (p < 0.001) and statutory care (p < 0.001, OR 5.42, 95%CI [2.34; 12.6]) also proved to be significant risk factors. The ROC curves of the two tests show AUC values of 0.741 (SIS) and 0.630 (CDT). The COP values for the SIS are 4 points with a Youden index of 0.447; for the CDT, the COP is 2 (Youden index = 0.177). Conclusions: The recording of PCI should be a central component of the preoperative geriatric assessment. The tools used are simple yet effective and can be easily implemented in routine clinical practice. By reliably identifying patients at risk, the available resources can be personalized and used in a targeted approach.

Correlation Between Reduced Daily Living Competence and the Risk of Postoperative Delirium in Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery.

Background/Objectives: Postoperative delirium is a prevalent and serious complication among elderly patients following surgical procedures. Prior research indicates that reduced competence in daily living, as evidenced by limitations in performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL), is directly associated with reduced patient mobility. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of preoperative mobility as a risk factor for the development of postoperative delirium. Methods: To assess preoperative mobility, a comprehensive geriatric evaluation of daily living competence was conducted. This included the Katz Index of Independence in ADL, which assessed basic daily activities over the preceding 14 days, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL). Postoperatively, delirium monitoring was performed twice daily for seven days using validated delirium screening tools, including the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale, the Confusion Assessment Method, and the 4ATest. Results: A significant correlation was observed between the incidence of delirium and the IADL scores in all patients, with p < 0.001 for men and p = 0.001 for women. Among emergency patients, the Katz Index scores significantly differed between those who developed delirium and those who did not (p = 0.015). Additionally, a significant correlation was found between the Katz Index and the incidence of delirium in both groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings of this study emphasize the necessity of preoperative geriatric assessment using tools such as the Katz Index or IADL to identify patients at risk of delirium. The results confirm the importance of enhanced postoperative monitoring for potential delirium. For elective patients, prehabilitation should be considered when reduced daily living competence is identified. For emergency patients, immediate postoperative interventions, including intensive mobilization and orthogeriatric co-management, are recommended.

Preoperative geriatric assessment to predict functional outcome after major urologic operations: Results from a multicenter study

IntroductionMajor urological tumor surgery entails a severe risk of unexpected adverse events, persistent functional deterioration, and death in older patients. The Erlangen Index (EI) geriatric assessment tool has previously been shown to predict incomplete functional recovery following major urological tumor surgery in an elderly patient collective. We prospectively evaluated assessment tools including EI in a multicenter setting. Materials and methodsA total of 340 patients over the age of 65 were assessed prospectively before and after cystectomy, prostatectomy, or renal tumor surgery at three academic centers in Germany and Austria. Endpoints were long-term functional deterioration (Activities of daily living (ADL) measured by Barthel-Index) at day 30 and day 180, and mortality at day 180. ResultsIn this study 58 (17.0 %) patients underwent cystectomy, 140 (41.2 %) prostatectomy and 142 (41.8 %) a kidney tumor operation. Mean age was 74.8 years. ADL impairment as a measure of incomplete recovery at day 30 and 180 after surgery were recorded in 47.6 % and 37.4 % of cases, respectively. The EI showed good sensitivity for mortality at day 180 (reference cohort: 85 %, validation center 1: 100 %, validation center 2: 50 %) and for ADL impairment at day 180 (reference cohort 75.4 %, validation center 1 72.3 %, validation center 2 83.3 %). ConclusionElderly patients with a poor performance status have a high risk of persistent functional deterioration. Data from this multicenter external validation trial confirms the EI as an accurate and reliable tool to identify patients with high risk of mortality or persistent postoperative functional impairment.

Short- and long-term predictive power of the preoperative Geriatric Assessment components in older patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Increasing numbers of older patients will require laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Physicians may have doubts when qualifying these patients for elective surgeries since older age is considered a risk factor for complications. Determining biological age, using a Geriatric Assessment (GA), should be the key factor in the preoperative assessment.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; The aim of this study was to determine which GA components and frailty alone are most useful for predicting postoperative outcomes in both short- and long-term follow-up.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Materials and methods:&lt;/b&gt; 219 consecutive patients aged ≥70 years underwent surgery and were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The preoperative GA consisted of functionality, physical activity, comorbidity, polypharmacotherapy, nutrition, cognition, mood, and social support domains. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the predictive ability of GA.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; GA, frailty, and chronological age were not predictive of major 30-day morbidity. There were significantly more overall postoperative complications in the frail group than in the fit group (21% vs 4%), with mainly minor (Clavien-Dindo I, II) and medical (16 patients; 72.7%) complications. There were no significant differences in the rate of major and surgical complications (8 patients; 36.4%) between frail and fit patients. Only frailty was a predictor of 1-year mortality odd ratio 12.17 (2.47-59.94) P = 0.002.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Performing GA before elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies seems unnecessary for the evaluation of short-term outcomes but helpful for the assessment of long-term outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed also in older frail patients.&lt;/br&gt.

Comparing outcomes of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in neck of femur fracture patients: an Australian registry study.

To determine discharge outcomes of displaced subcapital NOF patients who were from home, with intact pre-operative cognition, ASA 1 or 2 and independent walkers treated with either THA or hemiarthroplasty. A retrospective registry study was performed using data from the Australia and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR). Institutional ethics approval was obtained prior to commencement. Hip fracture registry records between 1st January 2016 and 31st January 2020 were reviewed. A total of 930 patients with complete records were identified and included. There were 602 THA and 328 hemiarthroplasty patients. Using multivariate analysis, pre-operative factors associated with THA include younger age (OR = 0.90 for every year older, p < 0.001), females (p = 0.043), private admissions (OR = 1.62, p = 0.028) and receiving pre-operative geriatric assessment (OR = 1.89, p = 0.002). Delay to theatre due to not being fit for surgery was associated with not receiving THA (OR = 0.21, p < 0.001). THA resulted in a shorter total hospital length of stay (MD = 7.24, p < 0.001), higher likelihood of being discharged home (OR = 1.88, p < 0.001) and lower likelihood of being discharged to a residential aged care facility (OR = 0.32, p = 0.019). Displaced subcapital NOF patients who were admitted from home, had intact pre-operative cognition, ASA 1 or 2, independent walkers and had THAs, had shorter total hospital length of stay, were more likely to be discharged home directly and less likely to end up in residential aged care facilities compared to those undergoing hemiarthroplasty.

Risk factors for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery: A single-center retrospective study.

To investigate the risk factors for postoperative delirium among elderly patients undergoing elective surgery for gastroenterological cancer. From May 2020 to March 2022, patients ≥75 years old with gastroenterological cancer who underwent radical surgery were enrolled. The geriatric assessment, including evaluations of frailty, physical function, nutrition status, and cognitive function, was conducted preoperatively. The confusion assessment method was used to diagnose postoperative delirium. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for postoperative delirium. A total of 158 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. Of these 53 patients (34%) developed postoperative delirium. In the univariate analysis, the age, regular use of sleeping drugs and benzodiazepine, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, performance status, Fried's frailty score, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 score, grip weakness, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form score, and Mini-Mental State Examination score were statistically associated with the incidence of postoperative delirium. In the multivariate analysis, a SPPB score ≤9, Mini Nutritional Assessment score ≤11, a Mini-Mental State Examination score ≤24, and regular use of benzodiazepine were found to be independent preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium. Certain findings during the preoperative geriatric assessment, especially low SPPB, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form and Mini-Mental State Examination scores, and regular use of benzodiazepine were risk factors for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery.

A novel predictive model for postoperative delirium using multiple geriatric screening factors.

The purpose of this study was to develop a new composite score to accurately predict postoperative delirium (POD) after major urological cancer surgery. Our retrospective analysis included, in total, 449 consecutive patients who experienced major urological cancer surgery and a preoperative geriatric functional assessment at our institution (development cohort). Geriatric functional assessments included Geriatric 8, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, and mini-cognitive assessment instrument (Mini-Cog). Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors related to POD and combined to create a predictive score. The composite score was externally validated using a cohort of 92 consecutive pancreatic cancer patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and a preoperative geriatric functional assessment (validation cohort). The predictive accuracy and performance of the composite score were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and calibration plots. In multivariate analysis of a development cohort, the following factors were significantly associated with POD: a Mini-Cog score of <3 (odds ratio [OR] = 9.5; p < 0.001), disability in the responsibility for medication (OR = 4.1; p = 0.03), and the preoperative use of benzodiazepine (OR = 6.4; p < 0.001). The composite score of these three factors showed excellent discrimination in predicting POD, with AUC values of 0.819 and 0.804 in development and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration plots showing predicted probability and actual observation in both cohorts showed good agreement. A combined model of Mini-Cog, a disability in the responsibility for medication, and preoperative benzodiazepine use showed excellent discriminative power in predicting POD.

Pre-operative geriatric screening and assessment as predictors of postoperative complications in older adults with gynecologic cancer: A pilot cohort study on a neglected issue

As the world population ages, the incidence of gynecologic cancer in older adults is increasing more rapidly than in younger patients [ [1] Dumas L. et al. Improving outcomes for older women with gynaecological malignancies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016; 50: 99-108https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.08.007 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar ]. Surgery is the cornerstone of gynecologic cancer treatment, but little is known about optimal therapy in older adults. Preoperative assessment of older patients is challenging not only due to cancer related factors, but also because comorbidity, functional status, social network and geriatric syndromes could play a role in determining the final outcome. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional evaluation of patients' global health status and consists of validated scales to identify impairments in geriatric domains. In different Geriatric Oncology (GO) settings, it has proved to be useful in identifying and managing underlying undetected medical, functional, and psycho-social impairments that may interfere with treatment [ [2] Maas H.A.A.M. Janssen-Heijnen M.L.G. Olde Rikkert M.G.M. Machteld Wymenga A.N. Comprehensive geriatric assessment and its clinical impact in oncology. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl. 2007; 1990: 2161-2169https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.002 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (145) Google Scholar ].

Frailty and surgical outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer: Integration of geriatric assessment and prehabilitation into surgical practice for vulnerable patients.

As life expectancy increases, the older population continues to grow rapidly, resulting in increased requirement for surgery for older patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Older individuals represent a heterogeneous group in terms of physiological reserves, co-morbidity, cognitive impairment, and disability. Owing to the lack of treatment guidelines for vulnerable patients with gastrointestinal cancer, these patients are more likely to be at risk of undertreatment or overtreatment. Hence, the identification of frail patients with gastrointestinal cancer would improve cancer treatment outcomes. Although there is no standardized geriatric assessment tool, a growing body of research has shown associations of frailty with adverse postoperative outcomes and poor prognosis after resection of gastrointestinal tract and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers. Emerging evidence suggests that prehabilitation, which includes exercise and nutritional support, can improve preoperative functional capacity, postoperative recovery, and surgical outcomes, particularly in frail patients with gastrointestinal cancer. We reviewed major geriatric assessment tools for identification of frail patients and summarized clinical studies on frailty and surgical outcomes, as well as prehabilitation or rehabilitation in gastrointestinal tract and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers. The integration of preoperative geriatric assessment and prehabilitation of frail patients in clinical practice may improve surgical outcomes. In addition, improving preoperative vulnerability and preventing functional decline after surgery is important in providing favorable long-term survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Further clinical trials are needed to examine the effects of minimally invasive surgery, and chemotherapy in frail patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Short- and long-term predictive power of the preoperative Geriatric Assessment components in older cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery

IntroductionThe pathological stage of the cancer and presence of postoperative complications are the most important predictors of survival in older oncologic patients. Therefore, determining biological age, and risks connected with it, should be the key factor in the preoperative assessment. It may be accomplished by using a Geriatric Assessment (GA). However, it is not established which components are most useful for predicting short- and long-term postoperative outcomes in cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery. Materials and methodsA total of 334 consecutive cancer patients aged ≥70 years underwent elective abdominal surgery and were followed-up prospectively for 12 months. The preoperative GA consisted of eight domains: functional, physical activity, comorbidity, polypharmacotherapy, nutritional, cognition, mood, and social support. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the predictive ability. ResultsAll components of GA were independent risk factors of 30-day major morbidity apart from ADL, BOMC, Polypharmacy (OR 0.6–1.3; p < 0.001). However, ADL, TUG, the polypharmacy and the MOS-SSS turned out to be significant predictors of 30-day mortality (OR 0.72–1.46; p < 0.001). In turn, only ADL, CDT and MOS-SSS were valid predictors of 12-months mortality (OR 0.46–0.85; p < 0.001). Frailty (surrogate of the biological age), not the chronological age, were also independent predictors of all outcomes (OR 4.71–8.56 p < 0.001). ConclusionNot the chronological age but components of GA and frailty are significant predictors of both 30-day postoperative outcome and 12-months mortality in older cancer patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery.

SIOG2021-0058 - Implementation of an Electronic Geriatric Screening tool for real-time Preoperative Geriatric Assessment prior to Cancer Surgery

SIOG2021-0058 - Implementation of an Electronic Geriatric Screening tool for real-time Preoperative Geriatric Assessment prior to Cancer Surgery

Development of a Telemedicine-based Preoperative Geriatric Assessment During Covid-19: An Institutional Pilot Study

Development of a Telemedicine-based Preoperative Geriatric Assessment During Covid-19: An Institutional Pilot Study

Preoperative geriatric assessment, a promising tool to improve outcomes in aortic pathology interventions.

Due to population aging and the spread of endovascular techniques for aortic diseases, there has been an increase in older population intervened. Objectively assessing patient's global status becomes mandatory in advanced ages, as impaired functional status and frailty are associated with higher postoperative mortality rates. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of a systematic geriatric preoperative assessment on the outcomes of aortic interventions. All patients above 60 years old with surgical indication for aortic disease between September 2016 and May 2019 underwent a standardized geriatric assessment. It analyzed physiological reserve, frailty, and life expectancy. An algorithm was created for its application before intervention indication. Variables registered were patient's data, type of aortic disease, type of intervention, geriatric assessment result, mortality and follow-up time. A bivariate analysis was performed. One hundred forty-four patients were included. Geriatric report was unfavorable for intervention in 6.25% (N.=9). From these, 88% (N.=8) were finally rejected for intervention. In those undergoing aortic intervention (N.=127) there was a 7% mortality rate (N.=9) and in the no-intervention group (N.=17) mortality rate raised up to 35% (N.=6). No aortic-related mortality was reported. A relevant association between an unfavorable geriatric report and mortality was found "OR 0.036 (CI 0.0082-0.155)." A protective relationship between any aortic intervention and mortality was found, with OR 0.139 (CI 0.043-0.447). Geriatric assessment is a valid tool to estimate life expectancy and patient's physiological status. An unfavorable report correlates with short-term non-aortic mortality independently of undergoing intervention. This has a high clinical relevance, and it highlights its practical applicability to improve aortic surgery indication's quality and optimize resource investment.

Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) score has the major impact on outcome prediction in elderly surgical patients with colorectal cancer: The FRAGIS study.

This study aims (I) to evaluate whether the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) score is associated with postoperative outcomes and (II) to develop a prognostic model for individual complication-risk prediction following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. This is a prospective multicentric cohort study. Consecutive ≥75-year-old candidates for elective CRC surgery were enrolled from October 2017 to August 2019. Patients underwent standardized preoperative geriatric assessment including the MPI. Patients with MPI score > 0.33 were classified as frail. Logistic regression models were employed to evaluate variables associated with major postoperative complications and mortality, using 10-fold cross-validated LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) for model selection. In all, 104 patients were included, 34 (33%) had MPI score > 0.33. Major postoperative complications occurred in 52% of frail versus 16% of fit (MPI score ≤ 0.33) patients (p < .01). Both 30-day (9% vs. 0%; p = .033) and 90-day mortality (18% vs. 1%; p < .01) were higher among frail patients. In multivariate analysis, MPI score was associated with adverse outcomes. A final postoperative complication predictive model was created, including MPI score, gait-speed test, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score, surgical approach, and stoma creation. MPI score is strongly associated with postoperative major complications in CRC elderly patients and it is a primary component of an individual prediction model.

Association of Preoperative Geriatric Assessment With Length of Stay After Combined Cardiac Surgery

For older patients undergoing cardiac surgery, geriatric factors are known to increase postoperative complications and prolong length of stay (LOS). Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an evidence-based method for geriatric evaluation to develop an individualized-care plan to optimize physical, functional, and social issues. This study analyzed the association between preoperative CGA and hospital LOS after combined cardiac surgery. This retrospective monocentric study included all patients aged 75 years and greater who underwent combined cardiac surgery between 2014 and 2017. Hospital LOS, intensive care unit LOS, and postoperative complications were compared between patients with or without preoperative CGA before and after propensity-score matching. Mean age of the 407 patients was 79.6 years; 114 underwent a preoperative CGA (28%). For 305 patients (74.9%), coronary artery bypass was associated with aortic valve replacement. After propensity-score matching, a significant difference was found between the 2 groups (preoperative CGA versus none) for in-hospital LOS (12 versus 13 days; P= .04) and intensive care unit LOS (3 versus 4 days; P= .01). In multivariable analysis, a significant association remained between hospital LOS and CGA (P= .02), renal function (P= .02), mitral replacement (P= .001), and complications (P= .001). Our results favor the use of systematic preoperative CGA. These encouraging results need to be validated by prospective studies that assess the impact of individualized-care plan established after CGA on postoperative outcomes. With an aging population, efforts are required to determine how to implement preoperative individualized-care plans to improve postoperative outcomes for vulnerable patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH): A Descriptive Analysis of Cancelled Surgery.

Geriatric collaborative care models improve postoperative outcomes for older adults. However, there are limited data exploring how preoperative geriatric assessment may affect surgical cancellations. This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis. Patients enrolled in the Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) program from 2011 to 2016 were included. POSH is a collaborative care model between geriatrics, surgery, and anesthesiology. Baseline demographic and medical data were collected during the POSH pre-op appointment. Patients who attended a POSH pre-op visit but did not have surgery were identified, and a chart review was performed to identify reasons for surgical cancellation. Baseline characteristics of patients who did and did not undergo surgery were compared. Of 449 eligible POSH referrals within the study period, 33 (7.3%) did not proceed to surgery; cancellation rates within the POSH program were lower than institutional cancellation rates for adults over age 65 who did not participate in POSH. Patients who did not have surgery were significantly older, more likely to have functional limitations, and had higher rates of several comorbidities compared with those who proceeded to surgery (P < 0.05). Reasons for surgical cancellations included a similar number of patient- and provider-driven causes. Many reasons for surgical cancellation were related to potentially modifiable factors, such as changes in goals of care or concerns about rehabilitation, emphasizing the importance of shared decision-making in elective surgery for older adults. These results highlight the important role geriatric collaborative care can offer to older adults with complex needs.

Frailty assessment tools and geriatric assessment in older patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies

BackgroundThe majority of patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) malignancies are older than 65 years. Due to the heterogeneity of this older population, decisions regarding surgical treatment cannot rely solely on treatment guidelines, but have to take into account patient frailty, geriatric impairments and resilience as well as patient preferences. In the few studies of older patients with HBP malignancies that have included a preoperative geriatric assessment (GA), frailty and elements from the GA such as reduced functional status have emerged as powerful predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of stay, type of treatment received and survival. A GA is a systematic evaluation of functional status, comorbidities, polypharmacy, cognition, nutritional status, emotional status, and social support. Materials and methodsA Pubmed search identifying clinical studies investigating the association between frailty, GA and outcomes in patients with HBP malignancies. ResultsA total of 20 studies were included in this review. For HBP malignancies, the evidence linking frailty and GA variables to negative outcomes is limited, but generally shows that frailty, functional dependency, comorbidity, and sarcopenia predict postoperative complications and survival. ConclusionAlthough scarcely investigated, frailty and elements from a GA seem to be associated with negative short- and long-term treatment outcomes in older patients with HBP malignancies. Future studies should investigate the impact of geriatric interventions and prehabilitation on outcomes.

Can a Simple Geriatric Assessment Predict the Outcome of TURP?

Purpose: To determine the impact of a simple preoperative geriatric assessment on the outcome in older patients with recurrent urinary retention who underwent desobstructive surgery. Patients and Methods: Patients aged 75 years or older with recurrent urinary retention referred for TURP entered this prospective, multicentre study. Several demographic, intra- and postoperative parameters were assessed. Preoperative geriatric assessment was performed by the 7-item Canadian Study of Health and Ageing (CSHA) frailty scale (1: very fit, 7: severely frail; completion takes less than a minute). The main outcome parameters were successful voiding rates at discharge and 3 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 54 patients were recruited; 42 (77.8%) patients had a CSHA index of 1–3 and were considered as “fit”, the remaining 12 (22.2%) formed the “frail” group (CSHA index 4–7). Age was identical in both cohorts (79.5 ± 3.7 vs. 79.7 ± 3.3 years); differences were demonstrable for the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.001), the number of daily medications (>4: 32 vs. 75%, p = 0.02), falls within the past 6 months (12 vs. 33%), and the necessity of home/nursing care (5 vs. 42%, p = 0.004). Intra- and perioperative complications, duration of postoperative catheterization, and length of hospitalization were identical in both cohorts. The success rate at discharge was 80.6% in fit and 75.0% in frail patients; the respective values at 3 months were 95.2 and 83.3%. Conclusions: A simple 1-min geriatric assessment tool can predict – to a certain extent – the outcome of desobstructive surgery in older patients with recurrent urinary retention. Fit patients achieve an excellent outcome while frail patients might benefit from a more in-depth urodynamic/geriatric evaluation.

Development of a Geriatric Prognostic Scoring System for Predicting Survival After Surgery for Elderly Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.

The number of elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer is rising as the population ages. This study aimed to assess the impact of a preoperative geriatric assessment on postoperative survival and to develop a geriatric prognostic scoring system (GPSS) for elderly patients. Patients (n = 544) age 75years or older who had undergone radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancer were recruited for this observational study. Geriatric assessments (GAs) using the Barthel Index, the Mini-Mental State Examination, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, the Vitality Index, and the Geriatric Depression Score were administered before surgery. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard regression model to identify significant prognostic factors. The GPSS was developed using regression coefficients of the multivariable regression to predict overall survival (OS). Thereafter, 165 consecutive patients were prospectively validated to test the authors' model. The independent predictors of OS appeared to be GA as well as age, type of cancer, clinical stage, performance status, and body mass index. The patients were classified into high- and low-risk groups according to the GPSS. The overall 3-year survival was 79% in the low-risk group and 26% in the high-risk group (hazard ratio [HR], 5.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.35-7.42; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, when GPSS was applied to independent cohorts, the patients in the high-risk group showed significantly poorer prognoses than those in the low-risk group (HR, 4.49; 95% CI 2.65-7.60; p < 0.0001). Geriatric assessments were closely associated with postoperative OS. The GPSS is useful in predicting postoperative prognosis and may help determine treatment strategies for elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Interprofessional Preoperative Geriatric Assessment for Older Arthroplasty Patients With Multimorbidity

Interprofessional Preoperative Geriatric Assessment for Older Arthroplasty Patients With Multimorbidity