Practice Of Prenatal Testing Research Articles

Prenatal Testing, Reproductive Autonomy, and Disability Interests

The issue of prenatal testing and selective abortion has never received open public appraisal. This is somewhat regrettable. The interest in this area, however, is rapidly growing. In part this is a result of concerns about the rate of development in genetic knowledge and questions as to its application. For instance, there will be a huge increase in the scope of conditions or features for which we will be able to screen, some of which could hardly be described as significant. Further, for some time now, people with disabilities have had concerns about the practice of prenatal testing and selective abortion. This article looks at the relationship between reproductive autonomy, prenatal testing and associated practices, and the interests of people with disabilities. It asks whether such practices negatively affect the interests of such individuals, and if so, how. This is an important question for the formulation of public policy in this area. Although some groups have studied this issue in detail, policy bodies do not necessarily fully engage with their analyses. This may be a reflection of public confusion about this issue. To some degree, fear of causing offense may also inhibit both expression of public opinion and, in turn, policy analysis. This is unfortunate and needs to be acknowledged.I am grateful to participants of the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine—King's College London—Oxford Consortium on Bioethics, 2003, for comments on an earlier draft of this paper and particularly to Professor Jonathan Glover and Dr. Bobbie Farsides for conversations relating to it.

Survey of physician attitudes toward HIV testing in pregnant women in Ohio.

HIV infection among women of childbearing age is still increasing in the United States. In most states, HIV testing of women or neonates during pregnancy is not mandatory. The current study assessed HIV prenatal testing practices among obstetrician-gynecologists and primary care physicians listed in a regional physician referral data base in a predominantly rural region. Between December 2000 and March 2001 a 20-question survey was sent by mail to regional physicians in obstetrics/gynecology and primary care regarding physician practice demographics and prenatal HIV testing practices. Of 1116 surveys sent, 431 were returned (38.6% response). Only 42% of physicians offered universal HIV prenatal testing. Factors associated with universal testing (p < 0.5) included obstetrics/gynecology as the practice specialty (90%) physicians' age younger than 50 years, and a practice with predominantly Medicaid or African American patients. Further educational and public health initiatives may be needed to increase nonselective, universal HIV testing in pregnant women.