Preinjury Sports Research Articles

Validation of the Short Form Shoulder Instability Return to Sport After Injury (SIRSI-5) and Its Association With Return to Sports.

Psychosocial readiness is thought to be important in establishing whether athletes are ready to return to sports (RTS). The 5-item Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport After Injury (SIRSI-5) is a short-form version of the 12-item questionnaire (SIRSI-12), which was validated in a postoperative Argentinian population and associated with psychological readiness to RTS. It is unknown if the SIRSI-5 is valid in surgical and nonsurgical populations in other geographic locations. To establish whether the SIRSI-5 is valid in another population and if it is associated with RTS. Cross-sectional study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. A total of 79 participants with anterior shoulder instability managed operatively and nonoperatively were included. The SIRSI-5 and SIRSI-12 total scores were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Pearson correlations assessed convergent validity between SIRSI-5 and SIRSI-12. Logistic regression was used to assess the discrimination ability (leave-one-out cross-validation [LOOCV]) of a preexisting SIRSI-5 cut point score (≥59/100) to determine participants who had returned to their preinjury level of sport. In addition, the discrimination ability (LOOCV) of multivariable machine learning models including age, sex, time since injury (months), SIRSI-5 (continuous score), surgery, and contact/noncontact sport to predict return to preinjury level sport was also assessed. The Youden index was calculated to assess the models' performance. Of the 79 participants, 62 (78.5%) were male and 27 (34%) had been treated surgically. Only 32% (n = 25) of participants had returned to preinjury level sport. The SIRSI-5 and SIRSI-12 were highly correlated (r > 0.9) with high levels of agreement (ICC, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95). The prediction accuracy of the SIRSI-5 cut point score model was 66% (Youden index, 0; sensitivity, 4%; specificity, 94%). The best prediction accuracy obtained through a machine learning model (multilayer perceptron) was 72% (Youden index, 0.4; sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 76%). The SIRSI-5 has excellent convergent validity with the SIRSI-12 to measure psychological readiness to RTS and can be used clinically with less patient burden than the SIRSI-12. However, in a population of surgically and nonsurgically treated contact athletes, the SIRSI-5 with a cut point of ≥59/100 had low levels of prediction accuracy for RTS at preinjury level. The SIRSI-5 should not be utilized in isolation to determine readiness to RTS, and clinicians should consider other factors such as age, type of sport, and time since injury to underpin their clinical reasoning when deciding for RTS.

Intralimb Coordination Pattern of the Lower Limbs in Male Athletes With Allograft and Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction During Landing

Background and Objectives: Two common choices exist for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, autograft and allograft. Hamstring tendon autografts and soft-tissue allografts are commonly used for ACL reconstruction. The outcomes between these two grafts are controversial. This research aims to quantify and compare lower limb joint coordination between two ACL reconstruction graft options and healthy individuals. Methods: Sixty-one athletes were enrolled after ACL reconstruction surgery (allograft, n=22; autograft, n=18). Furthermore, twenty-one healthy athletes were considered in the control group. The inclusion criteria included unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery with allograft and autograft methods, male athletes with a minimum of 9 months and a maximum of two years since their surgery, successfully passing a series of quadriceps and hamstring strength tests and distance jumping before entering sports-specific activities under the supervision of a sports physiotherapist, and returning to pre-injury sports activities. Results: Autograft was not statistically different from matched healthy limbs in terms of joint coordination variability and magnitude (P>0.05). However, the magnitude of joint coordination was superior to the allograft group compared to the autograft reconstructed ACL (P<0.05). Conclusion: Although our result reported no significant difference between groups in joint coordination variability, having an insight into coordinative function after ACL reconstruction will help develop postoperative rehabilitation programs as well as minimize the re-injury risk among patients. We also suggest that scholars should conduct more robust trials with valid research designs to control the results of ACL reconstruction comparison with autograft and allograft.

Medial sleeve fractures in elite-athletes: A heterogeneous group, anatomical and case-based considerations.

The purpose of this study is to provide a detailed description of the anatomy and radiology of the medial sleeve and present an approach in its management among elite athletes. Five cases of elite athletes who underwent treatment for a medial sleeve injury of which the diagnosis was confirmed through physical examination and additional magnetic resonance imaging scan are described in this study. Two patients presented with isolated medial sleeve injuries, while the other three patients suffered from concomitant ankle injuries. Non-operative treatment consisted of relative rest, soft cast immobilization and mobilization in a walking boot or kinesiotape which was successful in four of the cases with regard to the medial sleeve. One patient underwent surgery due to syndesmotic instability. Another patient presented with combined medial and lateral ankle instability which was treated surgically with an open medial and lateral ligament repair. All patients were able to return to their pre-injury sports and at the time of the last follow-up were still playing in their pre-injury level of competition. Medial sleeve injuries of the ankle in elite athletes should be considered in the differential diagnosis for athletes presenting with medial ankle pain. Inherent knowledge regarding anatomy is essential when guiding the management of these injuries which can be treated successfully with a non-operative approach consisting of relative rest, immobilization, kinesiotape and physical therapy. In case of persistent medial instability or rotational instability, surgical repair is a viable treatment option. Both modalities allow athletes to return to the pre-injury level of competition. However, early diagnosis is crucial to minimize the delay of appropriate treatment and avoid potential residual symptoms. Level IV.

Ankle-GO score is associated with the probability of becoming coper after lateral ankle sprain: a 1-year prospective cohort study

ObjectiveTo analyse the association between Ankle-GO score during the return to sport process and the probability of becoming a coper 1 year after lateral ankle sprain (LAS). Copers were defined...

What Are the Factors Associated With Revision Surgery on the Residual Limb and Functional Results in Patients With Posttraumatic Lower Limb Amputations?

Lower limb amputations performed after trauma are associated with a high risk of revision surgery. While the factors influencing revision surgery in the upper limbs have been studied, no studies have analyzed these factors in the lower limbs. Existing explanations for these revision surgeries are unclear, often leaving patients uninformed. Surgeons also lack the tools to explain the factors that influence repeat operations to patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide surgeons with some answers so they can inform their patients undergoing posttraumatic lower limb amputation, whether military or civilian. (1) What was the survivorship of the initial amputation free from any revision surgery? (2) What patient- and injury-related factors were associated with revision amputation? (3) Do these factors influence functional outcomes in these patients? A single-center, retrospective study was conducted between January 2010 and February 2020 on patients who had undergone traumatic lower limb amputation. Between January 2010 and February 2020, 322 patients underwent amputation or were followed up at Percy Military University Hospital. Thirty-one patients had undergone amputation at another center, 178 had undergone amputation for nontraumatic reasons, and 27 patients had only upper limb amputations. Of those remaining, 1 died before 6 months, and 6% (5 of 86) were not fitted with a prosthesis, leaving 99% (85 of 86) for survivorship free from revision analysis and 93% (80 of 86) for functional endpoints analysis in this retrospective study at a median of 6.5 years (IQR 5 to 9) following the index amputation. The median age at the time of amputation was 31 years (IQR 26 to 52), 85% (72 of 85) of patients were men, and 31% (26 of 85) were military personnel. Revision surgery was defined as surgery performed at or after 6 months to ensure that the residual limb was healed and fitted with a prosthesis. Revision procedures performed before 6 months (median 2 [IQR 0 to 7]) were considered as part of the initial residual limb formation surgery. We performed Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis for the time free from revision amputation from 6 months after amputation. We considered the competitive risk of death using a Fine-Gray model by an ascending stepwise procedure. To answer our third research question, we performed a chart review and assessed patients' use of prostheses and assistive devices and the percentage of patients who returned to work. An ordinal logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing functional outcome using an ascending stepwise procedure. A total of 85 patients (94 limbs) were included, of whom 25 (27 limbs) underwent a revision surgery on the residual limb > 6 months after amputation. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates indicated that 5 years after the initial amputation 64% (95% confidence interval 53% to 77%) of the patients remained free from revision surgery on their residual limb. Factors associated with increased odds of revision amputation were smoking (subdistribution HR 2.6 [95% CI 1.2 to 5.8]; p = 0.02) and an age of > 50 years (subdistribution HR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.8]; p = 0.01). Ninety-four percent (80 of 85) of patients were fitted with prostheses, and 40% (32 of 80) of patients used material or human assistance for simple activities of daily living. Seventy-one percent of patients (57 of 80) had returned to work. Ordinal logistic regression revealed an association between preinjury sports activity and the absence of need for assistance in daily activities (OR 9 [95% CI 2.9 to 31.8]; p < 0.001). Smoking appeared to be an associated risk factor for residual limb revision surgery in posttraumatic lower limb amputations and is potentially modifiable. Being at least 50 years of age seemed to be associated with a lower incidence of revision surgery, which is probably linked to lower functional demands made on limbs beyond this age. Our study showed a remarkable rate of fitting with a prosthetic device, with an improved functional result if the patient was athletic before the trauma. These results provide more precise information on the care pathway to be considered for each patient. A study with a much larger sample would make it possible to assess the risk factors for the occurrence of each complication involving revision surgery. Level III, therapeutic study.

The Use of a Suture Bridge Technique for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Under 40 Years of Age Resulted in Successful Tendon Healing, Pain Relief, Improved Shoulder Function, and High Patient Satisfaction at a Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and imaging outcomes after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tear (RCT) using a suture bridge technique in patients under 40 years of age. MethodA consecutive series of patients who were treated arthroscopically for RCT by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively identified. Both full thickness tears and partial tears were included. Arthroscopic cuff repair employed a knotless double-row suture bridge technique, utilizing braided suture tapes. To assess clinical outcomes, we employed the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), a strength score, and a visual analog scale (VAS). Tendon healing was evaluated at 12 months using the Sugaya MRI classification. ResultsA total of 63 patients were included in the study. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 33.6 years (range, 21 to 40) and minimum follow up duration was 5 years. Thirty-nine patients reported occasional sports, eight were professional athletes, while sixteen reported no sportive activity prior to first symptoms. Mean follow-up duration was 66.8 months (range, 62.4 to 88.6 months). A significant improvement was observed in both the Constant score and ASES score. The mean Constant score increased significantly from 39.8 (range, 29 to 52) points to 88.9 (range, 34 to 100) points postoperatively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the ASES score improved significantly from 41.8 (range, 30 to 64) to 90.2 (range, 35 to 100, p < 0.001). Anterior flexion mean improved from 86° (range: 60° to 110°) to 137° (range, 90° to 180°, p < 0.001). Pain significantly decreased after the surgery, VAS descending from 6.3 (range, 3 to 10) to 1.3 (range, 0 to 9) postoperatively. The overall rate of return to previous activities in the cohort was 84% at an average of 10.1 months (range, 6 to 12 months) after surgery. Among the included patients, 85% engaging in occasional sports activities and 67% of elite athletes similarly returned to their pre-injury sports levels after 9.8 (range, 6 to 12) months and 10.7 months (range, 6 to 12) respectively. Two patients (3%) experienced cuff re-rupture, and tendon non-healing (Sugaya stage 3 and stage 4) was observed in five (7%) patients. At the final follow-up, 95% of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with their functional results. ConclusionThe use of a suture bridge technique in arthroscopic RCT repair for patients under 40 years of age resulted in excellent long-term outcomes, including successful tendon healing, pain relief, improved shoulder function, and high patient satisfaction.

Effect of Different Screw Materials on ACL Reconstruction With the Tape Locking Screw Technique: A Retrospective Study From the FAST Cohort.

Screws for graft fixation are available in 3 different materials for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the Tape Locking Screw (TLS) technique: titanium, poly-l-lactic acid bioabsorbable, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). To compare the effect of the 3 different fixation materials on graft and implant survival after ACLR with the TLS technique. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Included were 521 patients from the French Prospective ACL Study (FAST) cohort who underwent primary surgical ACLR with the TLS technique. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the type of screw material used: titanium (TLS-T group), poly-l-lactic acid bioabsorbable (TLS-B group), or PEEK (TLS-P group). The primary endpoint was a retear within 2 years after ACLR. The secondary endpoints were complication rate, return to sports rate, and functional scores. Objective and subjective functional scores-including the International Knee Documentation Committee, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Lysholm score-were evaluated preoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up. Pain was assessed with the KOOS-Pain subscore recorded pre- and postoperatively every 6 months up to 2 years. Patient satisfaction was recorded at the 2-year follow-up. No significant differences between the study groups were found in retear rates (4.4%, 4.5%, and 4.3% in the TLS-T, TLS-P, and TLS-B groups 2 years after surgery) or subjective and objective outcomes. The TLS-T group had the lowest rate of intraoperative implant-related complications (0.9%) compared with the TLS-P (4.3%) and TLS-B (7.7%) groups. Young age was a significant risk factor for retear in the TLS-T (P = .03) and TLS-B (P = .0001) groups, while a high level of sports was found to be a significant risk factor in the TLS-P (P = .04) group. All functional scores improved significantly at the 2-year follow-up (P < .0001), with no significant group difference. The KOOS-Pain subscore improved continuously with no significant group difference. The rate of return to preinjury sports was between 43.4% and 58.6%. The rate of highly satisfied patients at the final follow-up was between 86.2% and 91.8%. There was no difference in retear rate or objective and subjective functional scores between implant materials for TLS ACLR in this study.

Machine Learning Models Reliably Predict Clinical Outcomes in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

PurposeTo develop the machine learning model to predict clinical outcomes following MPFLR and identify the important predictive indicators. MethodsThis study included patients who underwent MPFLR from January 2018 to December 2022. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) concurrent bony procedures, 2) history of other knee surgeries, and 3) follow-up period of less than 12 months. Forty-two predictive models were constructed for seven clinical outcomes (failure to achieve MCID of clinical scores, return to pre-injury sports, pivoting sports, and recurrent instability) using six machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, implemented multilayer perceptron, and K-nearest neighbor). The performance of the model was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanation summary plot was employed to identify the important predictive factors of the best-performing model. ResultsA total of 218 patients met criteria. For the best-performing models in predicting failure to achieve the MCID for Lysholm, IKDC, Kujala, and Tegner scores, the AUCs and accuracies were 0.884 (good) and 87.3%, 0.859 (good) and 86.2%, 0.969 (excellent) and 97.0%, and 0.760 (fair) and 76.8%, respectively; 0.952 (excellent) and 95.2% for return to pre-injury sports; 0.756 (fair) and 75.4% for return to pivoting sports; and 0.943 (excellent) and 94.9% for recurrent instability. Low preoperative Tegner score, shorter time to surgery, and absence of severe trochlear dysplasia were significant predictors for return to pre-injury sports, while absence of severe trochlear dysplasia and patellar alta were significant predictors for return to pivoting sports. Older age, female sex, and low preoperative Lysholm score were highly predictive of recurrent instability. ConclusionThe predictive models developed using machine learning algorithms can reliably forecast the clinical outcomes of MPFLR, particularly demonstrating excellent performance in predicting recurrent instability. Level of evidenceLevel III, case-control study.

Poster 116: When do Patients Return to Sports? Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction Versus Bankart Repair

Objectives: Participation in contact or collision sports is a known risk factor for shoulder instability. Recurrent instability is a barrier to return to same level of athletic activities following surgical intervention. Previous literature has described that approximately 50% to 90% of patients return to sports following stabilization procedures. However, it is currently unknown the rate and timing of return to sports after Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AAGR). This study aimed to determine the rate of return and the time to return to sports of patients’ who underwent AAGR compared to a Bankart, alone. Methods: This is a subcohort of 100 patients who consented to a randomized controlled trial and were randomized for AAGR or Bankart procedure (1:1 ratio). The subgroup consists of individuals at a minimum 2-year follow up and participate in a sport at either the recreational or competitive level. A descriptive analysis was completed on the percentage of patients that returned to their preinjury sport, as well as when they returned and compared between groups. Descriptive reporting on why patients did not return was included. Results: Age, follow up, sex, and sport level were all statistically similar between the 2 groups. The rate to return was significantly larger for patients in the AAGR group (78%) compared with the Bankart group (60%). For those who did return to sports, time to return was not significantly different between the AAGR group (9.48 ± 4.2 months) and Bankart group (10.2 ± 6.2 months). For those who did not return in the Bankart group, redislocation was the greatest factor (38%). In the AAGR group, prioritizing work and life (30%) and lack of confidence (30%) were the top reasons for not returning. Conclusions: AAGR demonstrated superior rate of return to sports compared to those who underwent a Bankart repair. Patients in the Bankart group did not return due to redislocation events, whereas individuals in AAGR did not return due to a lack of confidence or prioritizing their work and life. These results can aid in setting realistic expectations for patients undergoing AAGR and can help guide discussions around postoperative rehabilitation.

Poster 297: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Sports After Revision ACL Reconstruction With Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis: Comparison to A Control Group of ACL Reconstruction Only at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Objectives: Lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) has been shown to decrease failure rate in settings of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young, high-demand patients. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing clinical outcomes and return to sports after patients who undergo revision ACL reconstruction LET compared to those without LET (control group). Methods: All patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction with and without LET between January 2018 and February 2020 were queried at our institutional registry. The LET group was compared to the control group (revision ACL reconstruction without LET) were followed for a minimum of 24 months postsurgery to evaluate patients reported outcome measures, satisfaction, return to sports, rate of reoperation, and psychological readiness for return to sports (using the ACL-Return to Sport After Injury Scale, ACL-RSI). Results: A total of 81 patients with a mean follow-up of 2.75 years were included. The LET group contained 37 patients (76% female) with a mean age of 26.6 years and body mass index (BMI) of 23.5 kg/m^2 compared to 44 patients (80% female) with mean age of 28.2 years and BMI of 26.9 kg/m^2. There were no significant differences between the LET and control groups with respect to mean postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (47.7 vs 48.3, p = 0.46) and PROMIS Mobility scales (53.3 vs 52.9, p = 0.97). In addition, there were no differences in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (78.9 vs 78.3, p=0.45), Marx (7.9 vs 7.2, p = 0.64), or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (73.1 vs 74.2, p = 0.38) scores. The same held true with regards to postoperative ACL-RSI scores between the groups (43.3 vs 50.1, p = 0.38). Return to play rates after revision ACL were similar in the LET group compared to the control group (55% vs 45%, p = 0.40) with similar confidence to play their pre-injury sport (scale out of 100, 58.2 vs 56.2, p = 0.82). Lastly, overall reoperation rates were similar between the groups with the LET group having a rate of 21.2% compared to 19.4% for the control group. When isolated for revision due to graft tear, the LET group had a re-revision rate of 13.5% compared to 6.8% in the control group (p = 0.31). Conclusions: Satisfaction and patient reported outcome scores after revision ACL reconstruction are good with or without LET. While both groups have similar rates of return to play and reoperation at greater than 2- year follow-up, these results suggest the addition of LET may provide similar outcomes in high-risk patients when compared to isolated revision ACL reconstruction.

Athletes’ perspectives on return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and their strategies to reduce reinjury risk: a qualitative interview study

BackgroundInsights derived from athletes who have completed the final phase of rehabilitation and successfully returned to their respective sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction could potentially contribute to the enhancement of therapeutic strategies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore athletes’ experiences, thoughts, and behaviours of final phase rehabilitation and return to sport after ACL reconstruction and to describe their thoughts about the risk of reinjury.MethodsThis qualitative interview study included individual semi-structured interviews with 15 athletes after ACL reconstruction. All athletes were aged between 15 and 35 years (median, 23 years), had returned to their preinjury contact sport at elite or recreational competitive level, rehabilitated with different physioterapists (working in hospital, primary care or sport clinics), and had undergone primary ACL reconstruction between 14 and 59 months (median, 23 months) before the interviews. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsAnalysis of the data resulted in the following 4 main categories related to athletes’ experiences of the return to sport process and their thoughts about the risk of reinjury: Athletes’ strategies for safe return to sport; Support during rehabilitation and return to sport; The rehabilitation journey was worthwhile to be able to play again; and Reinjury is beyond one’s control.ConclusionsAthletes described strategies for a safe return to sport after ACL reconstruction, emphasizing continuous increased load, not forcing return to sport, injury prevention exercises, and seeking support from professionals and coaches. Despite loving their sport, the athletes had mixed feelings about undergoing additional rehabilitation if reinjured. The athletes recognized the high reinjury risk, attributing it to fate. These findings enhance understanding of athletes’ return to sport experiences after ACL reconstruction, their strategies to minimize reinjury risk, which might help optimizing care for this patient group.

A tight anterosuperior intercondylar notch may increase the risk of cyclops syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a quadruple semi-tendinosus short autograft

BackgroundCyclops syndrome is loss of terminal knee extension caused by a fibrous nodule developed in the anterior intercondylar notch. The many known risk factors include preoperative motion-range limitation, tibial tunnel malposition, and tight hamstrings. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether intercondylar notch size was associated with the risk of cyclops syndrome or graft tear after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a quadruple semi-tendinosis autograft. The secondary objective was to determine whether intercondylar notch size was associated with functional outcomes. HypothesisA narrow intercondylar notch is associated with higher risks of cyclops syndrome and poor functional outcomes. MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction by quadruple semi-tendinosus autograft were included retrospectively. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were assessed by a single senior surgeon, who determined the conventional notch width index (NWI) and the anterior NWI (aNWI) for each patient. ResultsThe 120 included patients had a mean follow-up of 2.4±0.8 years. Among them, 20 (16.7%) experienced cyclops syndrome and 7 (5.8%) graft rupture. At last follow-up, 26 (21.7%) had not returned to sports and only 47 (39.2%) had returned to sports at the pre-injury level. The mean Lysholm score was 87.9±13.5 and the main subjective IKDC score was 84±13. A narrow notch was significantly associated with lower likelihoods of returning to sports (p=0.001), returning to the same sport (p<0.0001), and returning to the pre-injury sport level (p=0.004). By multivariate analysis, only the aNWI index was significantly associated with the risk of cyclops syndrome (p<0.0001). An aNWI index lower than 0.18 had 85% sensitivity and 78% specificity for predicting cyclops syndrome. ConclusionA narrow anterosuperior intercondylar notch may increase the risk of cyclops syndrome after ACL reconstruction using a quadruple semi-tendinosus graft but is not associated with the risk of graft rupture. Level of evidenceIV, retrospective observational cohort study.

GRAFTS COMPARISON BETWEEN QUADRICEPS TENDON AUTOGRAFT VS. ALLOGRAFT FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REVISIOON RECONSTRUCTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic surgeries performed on active people in the world. One of the most important surgical decisions is graft type for use in the reconstruction. Recently, the quadriceps tendon has gained popularity for use as a graft source for ACL reconstruction. The graft choice is broadly between an autograft or allograft. This review aims to understand the current concepts in graft comparison between quadriceps tendon autograft vs. allograft for anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction. Methods: This literature review study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and adhered to a structured review protocol. The author searched the PubMed, ScienceDirect, and British Medical Journal databases. The authors comparing selected publications reporting patient outcomes with all types of reviews or descriptions of ACL revision reconstruction and its graft being used or other related subjects. Published in English is included. The author then formulates a synthesis to support the previously determined research objectives. Results: ACL reconstruction with partial thickness soft tissue quadriceps tendon graft is a reliable option. Where there are differences in the failure rates of ACL reconstructions between allografts and autografts, these can mostly be explained by irradiated grafts. Giving sufficient radiation to achieve sterility will likely weaken grafts and make them more likely to fail; therefore, irradiating grafts is not recommended. The evidence shows no significant differences in clinical effectiveness between autografts and non-irradiated allografts. Failure rates with both grafts are now low. Discussion: The primary goals of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction do not vary considerably based on graft type and emphasize: (1) restoration of the full range of motion, (2) normalization of quadriceps strength, (3) improvement of overall lower extremity muscle strength, and (4) re-training of movement patterns to return to pre-injury sports participation while decreasing injury risk. Achieving full motion and quadriceps strength contributes to a rapid return to normal weight bearing, gait, and activities of daily living. In the setting of revision ACL reconstruction, there are various considerations regarding graft choice due to tunnel size or position, previous usage of other grafts, and reconstructions in the other leg, which may mean that allografts would be preferred to autografts. The other population not covered sufficiently in the literature is the elite sprinting athlete, where autograft choices may be influenced by the effect of graft harvesting on their sport. However, in most cases, allograft ACL reconstruction with non-irradiated grafts is as safe but more expensive than autograft ACL reconstruction, which is preferred as it is more cost-effective. Conclusion: There is little difference in the results of ACL reconstruction with autografts or non-irradiated allografts, with any advantage being with autografts. The cost is higher with allografts. So if autografts are available, allografts are not cost-effective.

Reasons for Not Returning to Pre-injury Sport Level After ACL-Reconstruction.

The study aimed to identify athlete-reported reasons for not returning to pre-injury sports level after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify the factors associated with these reasons. Ninety-one athletes with 2 years post-ACLR indicated whether or not they had returned to their pre-injury sport level (same frequency, duration, and intensity). Athletes who did not return were asked to provide the reasons. Athletes' characteristics and injury-related factors were used to determine factors associated with the reasons for not returning. Only nine athletes (10%) returned to pre-injury sport level after ACLR. The most common reasons for not returning were lack of confidence or concerns about re-injury (48.8%), followed by continued post-surgical impairments in the reconstructed knee (39%). Having episodes of the knee giving way after ACLR was the only significant predictor of post-surgical impairments (48.8%; OR=8.3, 95%CI=2.48-27.42, p=0.001). Lack of confidence, concerns about re-injury, or post-surgical impairments in the reconstructed knee were the most frequently reported reasons for not returning to pre-injury sports level with 2 years post-ACLR. Reported dynamic knee instability was the only factor associated with ongoing post-surgical knee impairments after ACLR. Rehabilitation programs should address athletes' psychological responses and resolve knee impairments to optimize return to pre-injury sport level after ACLR.

Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Isolated Comminuted Trapezium Fracture: A Report of Two Cases.

Two competitive athletes with isolated comminuted trapezium fractures, sustained during American football and rugby, presented with pain and swelling of the first metacarpal base. Computed tomography confirmed isolated comminuted trapezium fractures. Arthroscopic reduction of displacement with screw fixation below the articular surface was performed through a small incision. Both patients returned to their preinjury sports levels within 2 months postoperatively. Arthroscopic treatment of isolated comminuted trapezium fractures achieved accurate reduction of articular surface displacement and preserved trapeziometacarpal joint stability with minimal soft-tissue invasion. This facilitated an early return to contact sports for the affected athletes.

Ultrasound- and Doppler-Guided WALANT Arthroscopic Surgery for Patellar Tendinopathy with Partial Rupture in Elite Athletes-A 2-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Case Series.

Background and Objectives: Patellar tendinopathy is difficult to treat, and when combined with partial rupture, there are additional challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate the subjective outcome and return-to-sport status after ultrasound (US)- and colour doppler (CD)-guided wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet (WALANT) arthroscopic shaving in elite athletes. Material and Methods: Thirty Swedish and international elite athletes (27 males) with a long duration (>1 year) of persistent painful patellar tendinopathy in 35 patellar tendons, not responding to non-surgical treatment, were included. All patients were treated with the same protocol of arthroscopic shaving, including bone removal and debridement of partial rupture, followed by at least 3 months of structured rehabilitation. The VISA-P score and a study-specific questionnaire evaluating physical activity level and subjective satisfaction with the treatment were used for evaluation. Results: At the 2-year follow-up (mean 23, range 8-38 months), 25/30 patients (29/35 tendons) were satisfied with the treatment result and had returned to their pre-injury sport. The mean VISA-P score increased from 37 (range 7-69) before surgery to 80 (range 44-100) after surgery (p < 0.05). There was one drop-out (one tendon). There were no complications. Conclusions: US- and CD-guided WALANT arthroscopic shaving for persistent painful patellar tendinopathy, including bone removal and debridement of partial rupture, followed by structured rehabilitation showed good clinical results in the majority of the elite-level athletes.

Late-stage rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A multicentre randomised controlled trial (PReP)

BackgroundAt the completion of formal rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, functional capacity is only restored in a small proportion of affected individuals. Therefore, the end of formal rehabilitation is not the end of functional rehabilitation. ObjectiveTo compare adherence to and effectiveness of a late-stage rehabilitation programme with usual care after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsThis prospective, double-blind, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial, included people aged 18 to 35 years after formal rehabilitation completion (mean [SD] 241 [92] days post-reconstruction). Participants were block-randomised to a 5-month neuromuscular performance intervention (Stop-X group) or usual care (medically prescribed standard physiotherapy, individual formal rehabilitation, home-exercises). All outcomes were measured once/month. Primary outcome was the normalised knee separation distance on landing after drop jump. Baseline-adjusted linear mixed models were calculated. ResultsIn total, 112 participants (Stop-X: 57; Usual care: 55,) were analysed. Initially, mean (SD) intervention frequency (units/week) was higher in the Stop-X than the Usual care group: 2.65 (0.96) versus 2.48 (1.14) units/week in the first and 2.28 (1.02) versus 2.14 (1.31) units/week in the second month. No between-group*time(*baseline)-differences were found for the primary outcome. Between-group*time-effects favoured the Stop-X-group at 2 months (fewer self-reported knee problems during sport, KOOS-SPORT) (estimate = 64.3, 95 % CI 24.4–104.3 for the Stop-X), more confidence to return to sport (ACL-RSI) (62.4, 10.7–114.2), fewer pain-associated knee problems (KOOS-PAIN) (82.8, 36.0–129.6), improved everyday activity abilities (KOOS-ADL) (71.1, 6.4–135.7), and improved limb symmetry index in the front hop for distance at 3 and 4 months (0.34, 0.10–0.57; 0.31, 0.08–0.54). No between-group*time-effects occurred for kinesiophobia, symptom-associated knee problems or balance hops performance. At the end of the intervention, 79 % of the Stop-X and 70 % of the Usual care participants (p < 0.05) had successfully returned to their pre-injury sport type and level. ConclusionsThe Stop-X intervention was slightly superior to usual care as part of late-stage rehabilitation after ACL-reconstruction. The small benefit might justify its use after formal rehabilitation completion.

No difference in operative time, outcomes, cosmesis, or return to activity and/or sport after minimally invasive versus open repair of primary Achilles ruptures: a retrospective review.

To compare clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sport among patients that have undergone minimally invasive repair versus open approach of an acute Achilles tendon rupture. Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture at a single urban academic institution from 2017 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. Preinjury sport participation and preinjury work activity information, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the Tegner Activity Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for mobility and pain interference were collected. In total, 144 patients were initially included in the study. Of these, 63 patients were followed with a mean follow-up of 45.3 ± 29.2months. The mean operative time did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.938). Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair returned to sport at a rate of 88.9% at a mean of 10.6 ± 5.8months, compared to return rate of open procedures of 83.7% at 9.5 ± 5.5months. There were no significant differences in ATRS (p = 0.246), Tegner (p = 0.137) or VAS pain (p = 0.317) scores between groups. There was no difference in cosmetic satisfaction between PARS and open repair groups (88.4 vs. 76.0; p = 0.244). Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures demonstrate no significant differences with respect to cosmesis, operative time, patient-reported outcomes and the rate and level of return to activities when compared to an open approach. III.

Clinical Outcomes and Return to Preinjury Sports After Anatomic Reconstruction With a Gracilis Autograft Versus the Modified Broström Procedure in Patients With Generalized Joint Laxity

Background: Generalized joint laxity (GJL) is a risk factor for inferior outcomes after the modified Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability, while anatomic reconstruction with tendons is more inclined to be recommended. However, whether anatomic reconstruction could achieve better results than the modified Broström procedure in patients with GJL is unknown. Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes and return to sports between anatomic reconstruction and the modified Broström procedure in patients with GJL. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with GJL (Beighton score ≥4) who underwent either the modified Broström procedure or anatomic reconstruction with gracilis autografts between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed. Included were 19 patients who underwent anatomic reconstruction (reconstruction group) and 49 patients who underwent the modified Broström procedure (MBP group). Clinical outcomes were compared using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Karlsson score. The rates of return to preinjury level in high-demand sports, sprain recurrence, and range of motion between the 2 groups were also compared. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 38.3 months in the reconstruction group and 43.7 months in the MBP group. The FAOS and Karlsson scores improved significantly after surgery in both groups ( P &lt; .001 for all), with the reconstruction group having significantly higher postoperative FAOS-Sports scores (87.9 ± 8.9 vs 80.5 ± 11.6; P = .015) and Karlsson scores (86.9 ± 6.1 vs 82 ± 8.4; P = .025) than the MBP group. The rate of return to preinjury high-demand sports was higher in the reconstruction group than in the MBP group (73.3% vs 38.9%; P = .034). The MBP group had a significantly higher rate of sprain recurrence (22.4% vs 0%; P = .027). More patients reported dorsiflexion restriction in the reconstruction group (n = 4; 21.1%) than in the MBP group (n = 1; 2%) ( P = .019); nonetheless, there was no noticeable effect on daily life and sports. Conclusion: Better clinical outcomes, less sprain recurrence, and a higher rate of return to preinjury high-demand sports were found after anatomic reconstruction with free tendons compared with the modified Broström procedure in patients with GJL. Anatomic tendon reconstruction can be recommended for such patients, especially those participating in high-demand sports.

Predictors of Early Return to Sport After Surgical Repair of Proximal Hamstring Complex Injuries in Professional Athletes: A Prospective Study

Background: Proximal hamstring complex injury (PHCI) is a common injury among professional athletes, particularly those participating in pivot contact sports. Previous studies have suggested that surgery can be effective in restoring function and allowing athletes to return to sport (RTS), but the factors influencing successful RTS have been less clear. Purpose: To assess RTS capabilities after surgical treatment of PHCI in professional athletes and to identify favorable predictors of RTS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This study (2002-2022) was conducted on professional athletes who underwent surgical treatment for PHCI at a sports surgery center. The primary outcome of the study was the RTS capability, evaluated based on the rate of athletes’ return to their preinjury level of competition, time delay to RTS, and quality of RTS as measured using their level of performance and progression of scores on activity scales such as the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), scale. “Maintained performance” was defined as athletes returning to the same preinjury activity level (per the TAS and UCLA scale) and perceiving themselves to have maintained their performance. Secondary outcomes covered the potential RTS predictors and complication rate. The study distinguished 2 types of PHCI: proximal hamstring tendon avulsion injury (proximal rupture with empty footprint, or having a “positive dropped ice cream sign”) and complete proximal hamstring free tendon rupture (PHTR; proximal rupture without empty footprint, or having a “negative dropped ice cream sign”). Results: The study examined 64 professional athletes (mean age, 27.3 years; 82.8% male) undergoing surgery for PHCI. The RTS rate was 98.4%, with 78.1% of the athletes returning to their preinjury level of competition at 6.2 months (SD, 2.5 months). Twelve (19%) patients had returned to sport at an inferior level of competition, and 2 (3.1%) were unable to continue in their preinjury sport. Subgroup analysis revealed variation in RTS based on sport type, with the highest rate of return to preinjury performance found in athletes in handball and sports with splits (fencing, squash, and escalade; 100%) and soccer (95.2%). In the univariate analysis, male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 4.05; 95% CI, 1.45-11.3; P = .008), higher preinjury TAS score (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06-1.52; P = .011), injury involving the semimembranosus (HR, 4.84; 95% CI, 2.31-10.2; P < .001) or conjoint tendon (HR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.55-6.25; P = .001), and PHTR (HR, 7.77; 95% CI, 3.54-17.0; P < .001) were significantly associated with a better postoperative level of competition. Multivariate analysis identified 3 favorable predictors of RTS with HRs of 2.91 (95% CI, 1.01-8.35; P = .047) for male sex, 3.86 (95% CI, 1.78-8.37; P < .001) for isolated semimembranosus injury, and 5.18 (95% CI, 2.24-12.0; P < .001) for PHTR. The complication rate was 4.7%. Conclusion: Favorable predictors of early RTS were male sex, isolated semimembranosus injury, and PHTR injuries. Registration: NCT02906865 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).