Prehospital Trauma Deaths Research Articles

Provider Fatigue During Direct Manual Compression for Life-Threatening Bleeding.

IntroductionTrauma is a leading cause of death throughout the world, with hemorrhage being responsible for more than 35% of pre-hospital trauma deaths and more than 40% of deaths within the first 24 hours after injury. Despite first aid having a demonstrable effect on mortality from trauma, relatively little research has compared the best methods for bleeding control in the prehospital first aid setting. The most common first-line therapy for external bleeding control in the pre-hospital first aid setting is direct manual compression (DMC). However, a prior study demonstrated that the primary cause of failure in a simulated model of life-threatening bleeding was the inability to maintain adequate direct pressure for three minutes. In this study, we evaluated the effect of fatigue on DMC for the duration of a typical urban emergency medical services (EMS) response time.MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational trial of 33 participants, 18 years of age or older to measure the pressure generated on a model of life-threatening bleeding over an eight-minute period using a “CPR posture” for applying pressure. The primary analyses were longitudinal two-level multilevel models (MLM) with repeated measures of outcome (i.e., CPR posture pressure) nesting within participants. The demographic factors of gender, age, and weight were included as moderators in the analyses and each was analyzed independently.ResultsThe participants’ average age was 31 (SD = 11) and the average weight was 161 pounds (SD = 31). The sample consisted of 18 female participants (54.5%) and 15 male participants (45.5%). Applied DMC pressure declined over time, more sharply initially from the beginning to approximately 250 seconds, at which point the decrease in pressure was gradual. Of the demographic factors, gender was associated with a difference in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) posture pressure over time.ConclusionRescuers should be aware that fatigue may occur and may affect the quality of direct manual compression for control of life-threatening bleeding. Further research is needed to define the external pressures needed to control life-threatening bleeding and the extent that rescuer fatigue affects this pressure.

Access to specialist hospital care and injury survivability: identifying opportunities through an observational study of prehospital trauma fatalities

BackgroundOf the five million injury deaths that occur globally each year, an estimated 70% occur before the injured person reaches hospital. Although reducing the time from injury to definitive care has been shown to achieve better outcomes for patients, the relationship between injury incident location and access to specialist care has been largely unexplored. ObjectiveTo determine the number and distribution of prehospital (on-scene/en route) trauma deaths without timely access to a hospital with surgical and intensive care capabilities, overall and by estimated injury survivability. MethodsNew Zealand's Mortality Collection and Hospital Discharge dataset were used to select prehospital injury deaths in 2009-2012. These records were linked to files held by Australasia's National Coronial Information Service (NCIS) to estimate, for the trauma subset, injury survivability. Using geographical locations of injury for the prehospital trauma fatalities, time from Emergency Medical System call-out to arrival at the closest specialist hospital was estimated. ResultsOf 1,752 prehospital trauma fatalities, 14.7% (95%CI 13.0, 16.4) had potentially survivable injuries that occurred in locations without timely access (prehospital phase >60 minutes). More than half (132 of 257) of the potentially survivable prehospital trauma fatalities without timely access died as a result of a motor vehicle traffic crash. Only 10% (95%CI 5.7, 16.0) of prehospital trauma fatalities from falls were estimated to be potentially survivable and without timely access compared to 24.6% (95%CI 18.5, 31.5) of prehospital firearm fatalities. Through using geospatial techniques, “hot spot” locations of potentially survivable injuries without timely access to specialist major trauma hospitals were apparent. ConclusionApproximately 15% of prehospital trauma fatalities in New Zealand that are potentially survivable occur in locations without timely access to advanced level hospital care. Continued emphasis is required on both improving timely access to advanced trauma care, and on primary prevention of serious injuries. Decisions regarding trauma service delivery, a modifiable system-level factor, should consider the geographic distribution of locations of these injury events alongside the resident population distribution.

Protocol for a multicentre prehospital randomised controlled trial investigating tranexamic acid in severe trauma: the PATCH-Trauma trial

IntroductionHaemorrhage causes most preventable prehospital trauma deaths and about a third of in-hospital trauma deaths. Tranexamic acid (TXA), administered soon after hospital arrival in certain trauma systems, is an effective...

Cardiovascular and liver disease among pre-hospital trauma deaths: A review of autopsy findings

Introduction Pre-existing disease is a common contributor to mortality and morbidity after injury and resuscitation of injured patients are often altered in hospital based on comorbidities. However, this is uncommon in the pre-hospital phase of care where patients are managed according to clinical practice guidelines. This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and liver disease among trauma patients attended by pre-hospital clinicians but who died prior to reaching hospital and assess associations with age. Methods This was a retrospective review of pre-hospital trauma deaths in the state of Victoria, Australia between 01 Jan 2008 and 31 Dec 2014. The inclusion criteria were (a) patients attended by pre-hospital clinicians, (b) deceased before arrival to hospital, (c) evidence of recent trauma and (d) underwent a full autopsy. Cardiovascular and liver disease status were extracted from autopsy reports. Results There were 1043 patients included in this study. Most patients were male (77.1%). Intentional self-harm was significantly more common in patients aged ≥65 years (17.4%). CVD was prevalent in 495 (47.5%; 95%CI: 44.4–50.5) cases with myocardial fibrosis the most common abnormality detected. All sub-groups of CVD demonstrated a significant association with increasing age, except right ventricular hypertrophy. Liver disease was present in 235 (22.5%; 95%CI: 20.1-25.2) patients and most common among patients aged 35–64 years. Discussion CVD was prevalent in almost half of all injured patients included in this study while liver disease was present in about a fifth. The prevalence of CVD was associated with increasing age, while liver disease was more common among middle-aged patients. This high prevalence in our population indicates that pre-existing cardiovascular and liver disease be considered when tailoring pre-hospital life-saving interventions for injured patients.

Early and prehospital trauma deaths: Who might benefit from advanced resuscitative care?

Recent civilian and military data from the United States and the United Kingdom suggest that further reductions in mortality will require prehospital or preoperating room hemorrhage control and blood product resuscitation. The aims of this study were to examine the potential preventability of prehospital and early in-hospital fatalities, and to consider the geographical location of such incidents, to contextualize how the use of advanced resuscitative techniques could be operationalized. Retrospective analysis of prehospital and early in-hospital trauma deaths from January to December 2017. Data were obtained from the Coroner/ME's Office. Each death was reviewed by a panel of two trauma surgeons and a forensic pathologist. Anatomical and physiological survivabilities were evaluated separately, and then combined, leading to a holistic assessment of preventability. Incident locations were mapped and analyzed using ArcGIS. Three hundred sixteen trauma deaths were identified. Two hundred thirty-one (73%) were deemed anatomically not survivable; 29 (9%) anatomically survivable, but only with hospital care; 43 (14%) anatomically survivable with advanced prehospital care; and 13 (4%) anatomically survivable with basic prehospital care. Physiologically, 114 (36%) of the patients had been dead for some time when found; 137 (43%) had no cardiorespiratory effort on arrival of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) at the scene; 24 (8%) had cardiorespiratory effort at the scene, but not on arrival at the emergency department; and 41 (13%) had cardiorespiratory effort on arrival at the emergency department, but died shortly after. Combining the assessments, 10 (3%) deaths were deemed probably not preventable, 38 (12%) possibly preventable, and the remaining 278 (85%) not preventable. Twelve percent of trauma deaths were potentially preventable and might be amenable to advanced resuscitative interventions. Operationalizing this type of care will be challenging and will require either prehospital doctors, or very highly trained paramedics, nurses, or physician assistants. Epidemiological, level III.

Potentially preventable trauma deaths: A retrospective review

BackgroundReviewing prehospital trauma deaths provides an opportunity to identify system improvements that may reduce trauma mortality. The objective of this study was to identify the number and rate of potentially preventable trauma deaths through expert panel reviews of prehospital and early in-hospital trauma deaths. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of prehospital and early in-hospital (<24 h) trauma deaths following a traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest that were attended by Ambulance Victoria (AV) in the state of Victoria, Australia, between 2008 and 2014. Expert panels were used to review cases that had resuscitation attempted by paramedics and underwent a full autopsy. Patients with a mechanism of hanging, drowning or those with anatomical injuries deemed to be unsurvivable were excluded. ResultsOf the 1183 cases that underwent full autopsies, resuscitation was attempted by paramedics in 336 (28%) cases. Of these, 113 cases (34%) were deemed to have potentially survivable injuries and underwent expert panel review. There were 90 (80%) deaths that were not preventable, 19 (17%) potentially preventable deaths and 4 (3%) preventable deaths. Potentially preventable or preventable deaths represented 20% of those cases that underwent review and 7% of cases that had attempted resuscitation. ConclusionsThe number of potentially preventable or preventable trauma deaths in the pre-hospital and early in-hospital resuscitation phase was low. Specific circumstances were identified in which the trauma system could be further improved.

Changes in the temporal distribution of in-hospital mortality in severely injured patients-An analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU.

BackgroundThe temporal distribution of trauma mortality has been classically described as a trimodal pattern with an immediate, early and late peak. In modern health care systems this time distribution has changed.MethodsData from the TraumaRegister DGU was analysed retrospectively. Between 2002 and 2015, all registered in-hospital deaths with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 were evaluated considering time of death, trauma mechanism, injured body area, age distribution, rates of sepsis and multiple organ failure. Pre-hospital and post-discharge trauma deaths were not considered.Results78 310 severely injured patients were registered, non-survivors constituted 14 816, representing an in-hospital mortality rate of 18.9%. Mean ISS of non-survivors was 36.0±16.0, 66.7% were male, mean age was 59.5±23.5. Within the first hour after admission to hospital, 10.8% of deaths occurred, after 6 hours the percentage increased to 25.5%, after 12 hours 40.0%, after 24 hours 53.2% and within the first 48 hours 61.9%. Mortality showed a constant temporal decrease. Severe head injury (defined by Abbreviated Injury Scale, AIS-Head≥3) was found in 76.4% of non-survivors. Patients with an isolated head injury showed a more distinct decrease in survival rate, which was accentuated in the first days after admission. The correlation of age and time of death showed a proportional increase with age (55-74a). The rate of sepsis and multiple organ failure among non-survivors was 11.5% and 70.1%, respectively.ConclusionIn a modern trauma care system, the mortality distribution of severely injured patients has changed its pattern, where especially the third peak is no longer detectable.

Reviewing prehospital trauma deaths

Introduction: This study aimed to conduct detailed reviews of prehospital and early in-hospital trauma deaths to identify opportunities to improve the system of care.

Prehospital deaths from trauma: Are injuries survivable and do bystanders help?

Background and objectivesDeaths from trauma occurring in the prehospital phase of care are typically excluded from analysis in trauma registries. A direct historical comparison with Hussain and Redmond's study on preventable prehospital trauma deaths has shown that, two decades on, the number of potentially preventable deaths remains high. Using updated methodology, we aimed to determine the current nature, injury severity and survivability of traumatic prehospital deaths and to ascertain the presence of bystanders and their role following the point of injury including the frequency of first-aid delivery. MethodsWe examined the Coroners’ inquest files for deaths from trauma, occurring in the prehospital phase, over a three-year period in the Cheshire and Manchester (City), subsequently referred to as Manchester, Coronial jurisdictions. Injuries were scored using the Abbreviated-Injury-Scale (AIS-2008), Injury Severity Score (ISS) calculated and probability of survival estimated using the Trauma Audit and Research Network's outcome prediction model. ResultsOne hundred and seventy-eight deaths were included in the study (one hundred and thirty-four Cheshire, forty-four Manchester). The World Health Organisation's recommendations consider those with a probability of survival between 25–50% as potentially preventable and those above 50% as preventable. The median ISS was 29 (Cheshire) and 27.5 (Manchester) with sixty-two (46%) and twenty-six (59%) respectively having a probability of survival in the potentially preventable and preventable ranges. Bystander presence during or immediately after the point of injury was 45% (Cheshire) and 39% (Manchester). Bystander intervention of any kind was 25% and 30% respectively. Excluding those found dead and those with a probability of survival less than 25%, bystanders were present immediately after the point of injury or “within minutes” in thirty-three of thirty-five (94%) Cheshire and ten of twelve (83%) Manchester. First aid of any form was attempted in fourteen of thirty-five (40%) and nine of twelve (75%) respectively. ConclusionsA high number of prehospital deaths from trauma occur with injuries that are potentially survivable, yet first aid intervention is infrequent. Following injury there is a potential window of opportunity for the provision of bystander assistance, particularly in the context of head injury, for simple first-aid manoeuvres to save lives.

Prehospital deaths from trauma: Are injuries survivable and do bystanders help?

Abstract Background and objectives Deaths from trauma occurring in the prehospital phase of care are typically excluded from analysis in trauma registries. A direct historical comparison with Hussain and Redmond's study on preventable prehospital trauma deaths has shown that, two decades on, the number of potentially preventable deaths remains high. Using updated methodology, we aimed to determine the current nature, injury severity and survivability of traumatic prehospital deaths and to ascertain the presence of bystanders and their role following the point of injury including the frequency of first-aid delivery. Methods We examined the Coroners’ inquest files for deaths from trauma, occurring in the prehospital phase, over a three-year period in the Cheshire and Manchester (City), subsequently referred to as Manchester, Coronial jurisdictions. Injuries were scored using the Abbreviated-Injury-Scale (AIS-2008), Injury Severity Score (ISS) calculated and probability of survival estimated using the Trauma Audit and Research Network's outcome prediction model. Results One hundred and seventy-eight deaths were included in the study (one hundred and thirty-four Cheshire, forty-four Manchester). The World Health Organisation's recommendations consider those with a probability of survival between 25–50% as potentially preventable and those above 50% as preventable. The median ISS was 29 (Cheshire) and 27.5 (Manchester) with sixty-two (46%) and twenty-six (59%) respectively having a probability of survival in the potentially preventable and preventable ranges. Bystander presence during or immediately after the point of injury was 45% (Cheshire) and 39% (Manchester). Bystander intervention of any kind was 25% and 30% respectively. Excluding those found dead and those with a probability of survival less than 25%, bystanders were present immediately after the point of injury or “within minutes” in thirty-three of thirty-five (94%) Cheshire and ten of twelve (83%) Manchester. First aid of any form was attempted in fourteen of thirty-five (40%) and nine of twelve (75%) respectively. Conclusions A high number of prehospital deaths from trauma occur with injuries that are potentially survivable, yet first aid intervention is infrequent. Following injury there is a potential window of opportunity for the provision of bystander assistance, particularly in the context of head injury, for simple first-aid manoeuvres to save lives.

Mortui vivos docent : The dead teach the living

There are considerable similarities and intersections between forensic medicine and emergency medicine. This applies especially to frustraneously resuscitated patients or other lethal clinical courses of traumatized patients who are subject to latter forensic autopsy. Cooperation between departments of emergency and forensic medicine not only has emergency medical training potential, but also the possibility of retrospective evaluation of medical emergency measures - both in individual cases and with regard to epidemiological aspects. In particular, the widespread registration of autopsied pre-hospital trauma deaths that occurred despite on-scene resuscitation attempts is useful. The pre-hospital situation represents ahotspot, but also a blind spot in the overall trauma mortality. In recent clinical registers, preclinical deaths go mostly unrecorded, despite the undisputed benefits of clinical registers.

A Call for Consensus on Methodology and Terminology to Improve Comparability in the Study of Preventable Prehospital Trauma Deaths: A Systematic Literature Review.

The study of preventable deaths is essential to trauma research for measuring service quality and highlighting avenues for improving care and as a performance indicator. However, variations in the terminology and methodology of studies on preventable prehospital trauma death limit the comparability and wider application of data. The objective of this study was to describe the heterogeneity in terminology and methodology. We performed a systematic literature review and report this using the PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted using PubMed (including Medline), Ovid, and Embase databases. Studies, with a full text available in English published between 1990 and 2015, meeting the following inclusion criteria were included: analysis of 1) deaths from trauma, 2) occurring in the prehospital phase of care, and 3) application of criteria to ascertain whether deaths were preventable. One author screened database results for relevance by title and abstract. The full text of identified papers was reviewed for inclusion. The reference list of included papers was screened for studies not identified by the database search. Data were extracted on predefined core elements relating to preventability reporting and definitions using a standardized form. Twenty-seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified: 12 studies used two categories to assess the preventability of death while 15 used three categories. Fifteen variations in the terminology of these categories and combination with death descriptors were found. Eleven different approaches were used in defining what constituted a preventable death. Twenty-one included survivability of injuries as a criterion. Methods used to determine survivability differed and eight variations in parameters for categorization of deaths were used. Nineteen used panel review in determining preventability with six implementing panel blinding. Panelcomposition varied greatly by expertise of personnel. Separation of prehospital deaths differed with 10 separating those dead at scene (DAS) and dead on arrival, three excluding those DAS, three excluding deaths prior to EMS arrival, and 11 not separating prehospital deaths. The heterogeneity in methodology, terminology, and definitions of "preventable" between studies render data incomparable. To facilitate common understanding, comparability, and analysis, a commonly agreed ontology by the prehospital research community is required.

Epidemiology of Trauma Deaths: Volume, Methodology, and Comparability—Reply to Letter

We are thankful for the insightful comments on our prospective population-based epidemiological study on traumatic deaths in our trauma system (John Hunter Hospital, New South Wales, Australia) [1]. Our study evaluated the first year of our trauma center/trauma system after the establishment of the new trauma service and concluded the challenge of an aging population; the potential relative increase of hemorrhage related deaths in high-energy trauma and warned about the growing problem of lowenergy fall related deaths. We are well aware of the Professor Soreide’s 9-year retrospective evaluation of 260 trauma autopsies from Norway [2]. We strongly agree with the concept that geographical location and different time points of assessment are, not surprisingly, leading to different results. These two reasons influenced our study design. First, we wanted to describe the epidemiology of traumatic deaths in a comprehensive (highand low-energy) prospective fashion, including all inhospital and prehospital trauma deaths, which has not been done in Australia before. Second, considering the rapid change in the delivery of trauma care (especially in a young trauma system), we insisted to a 12-month prospective study similar to the studies that we considered landmark papers [3–5]. We believe more frequent comparison of shorter periods (12 months) are potentially more meaningful than lumping many years of data together from relatively low volume centers. Our study described 103 trauma fatalities in 1 year, whereas the Stavanger University Hospital 9-year experience was 260 fatalities (29 trauma deaths per year). Their severely injured (ISS [15) is 80–85 patients/year, whereas the John Hunter Hospital admits alone 400–420 patients in the same category annually. We do not feel that the two trauma systems are highly comparable. However, we are convinced that the SUH standards of trauma care are very different today compared with 1996 when their 9 years retrospective study started. Hopefully, we will be able to document similar improvements in our trauma system. We reported both low-energy and high-energy traumatic deaths, because our trauma center and system is committed to address the often very distinct requirements of these two patient populations. This did not prevent us from publishing both high-energy (12.3/100,000/year) and low-energy (8.6/100,000/year) incidence separately to allow comparisons with other population based studies. Our study design, detailed in the Methods section, explicitly excluding asphyxia without injuries: ‘‘Deaths related to electrocution, drowning, hanging asphyxiation, strangling, and poisoning were excluded from the data analysis.’’ We also agree with the potential misinterpretation of temporal patterns of the epidemiology of trauma deaths in many communications. To avoid this bias our study design (time frames and categories of deaths) followed the previous studies referred to the trimodal death distribution. Again, our study was a baseline description of the epidemiology of traumatic deaths in our young trauma system. Some of the authors of this study have firsthand experience of the European, North American, and Australian trauma care, which might eliminate some of the uncertainties of comparing different trauma systems. We definitively agree with the letter that longitudinal Z. J. Balogh (&) J. A. Evans Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia e-mail: Zsolt.Balogh@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au

Could bystander first‐aid prevent trauma deaths at the scene of injury?

To identify potentially preventable prehospital deaths following traumatic cardiac arrest. Deaths following prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest during 2003 were reviewed in the state of Victoria, Australia. Possible survival with optimal bystander first-aid and shorter ambulance response times were identified. Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were calculated. Victims with an ISS <50 and signs of life were reviewed for potentially preventable factors contributing to death including signs of airway obstruction, excessive bleeding and/or delayed ambulance response times. We reviewed 112 cases that had full ambulance care records, hospital records and autopsy details in Victoria 2003. Most deaths involved road trauma and 55 victims had an ISS <50. Twelve patients received first-aid from bystanders. Ambulance response times >10 min might have contributed to five deaths with an ISS <25. Five (4.5%) potentially preventable prehospital trauma deaths were identified. Three deaths potentially involved airway obstruction and two involved excessive bleeding. There is a case for increased awareness of the need for bystander first-aid at scene following major trauma.

Cost-Effectiveness and Benefit of Alternatives to Improve Training for Prehospital Trauma Care in Mexico

In Latin America, there is a preponderance of prehospital trauma deaths. However, scarce resources mandate that any improvements in prehospital medical care must be cost-effective. This study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of several approaches to improving training for personnel in three ambulance services in Mexico. In Monterrey, training was augmented with PreHospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) at a cost of [US] dollar 150 per medic trained. In San Pedro, training was augmented with Basic Trauma Life Support (BTLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and a locally designed airway management course, at a cost of dollar 400 per medic. Process and outcome of trauma care were assessed before and after the training of these medics and at a control site. The training was effective for both intervention services, with increases in basic airway maneuvers for patients in respiratory distress in Monterrey (16% before versus 39% after) and San Pedro (14% versus 64%). The role of endotrachal intubation for patients with respiratory distress increased only in San Pedro (5% versus 46%), in which the most intensive Advanced Life Support (ALS) training had been provided. However, mortality decreased only in Monterrey, where it had been the highest (8.2% before versus 4.7% after) and where the simplest and lowest cost interventions were implemented. There was no change in process or outcome in the control site. This study highlights the importance of assuring uniform, basic training for all prehospital providers. This is a more cost-effective approach than is higher-cost ALS training for improving prehospital trauma care in environments such as Latin America.

Systematic review of trauma system effectiveness based on registry comparisons.

Trauma registries offer distinct advantages and disadvantages when assessing the effectiveness of trauma systems. Detailed injury data and statistical comparisons that use TRISS methodology and the Major Trauma Outcome Study norms provide advantages over population-based or preventable death studies. However, miscodings and registry differences in injury severity coding limit the validity and generalizability of findings. The purpose of this study was to identify these strengths and weaknesses and to determine whether registry studies provide evidence of trauma system efficacy. A systematic review of published literature assessing trauma systems effectiveness by using registry-based data. Eight of 11 articles reviewed provided comparable data and consistently demonstrated a 15 to 20% reduction in the risk of death comparing trauma system outcomes to Major Trauma Outcome Study norms. These studies provide evidence of the effectiveness of trauma systems. However, future studies that use trauma registries would be strengthened by including both prehospital and postdischarge trauma deaths, standardizing trauma registry inclusion criteria and developing a contemporary national reference norm for trauma outcome.

Preventable prehospital trauma deaths in a Hellenic urban health region: an audit of prehospital trauma care.

To identify preventable prehospital deaths, caused by trauma. Analysis of 82 trauma victims who were dead on arrival (DOA) into our hospital. General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece. Evaluation of the autopsy findings of 82 DOAs. Demographic, autopsy, and toxicology data, ICD9 codes, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS)-90, Injury Severity Score (ISS)-body regions, central nervous system (CNS) deaths, non-CNS deaths, p values, and opinion of a clinical assessor. The 29 (35.36%) DOAs had at least one AIS6 injury. Extracranial hemorrhage, airway, and breathing dysfunction were contributing factors of death of 27 "possibly preventable" CNS deaths, and the causes of death for the 20 non-CNS deaths. p value (0.5) indicated that 24 (29.26%) of the DOAs expected to survive. The clinical assessor characterized four (4.87%) as "definitely preventable" and 35 (42.65%) as "possibly preventable" deaths. Upgrading of the emergency medical care service is required.

Prehospital deaths in the Yorkshire Health Region.

To estimate the proportion of prehospital deaths in a British population of trauma victims which may be preventable, and to investigate the effect of death at the scene and death in transit on potential survivorship. Blinded review, by four specialists with an interest in trauma, of necropsy results and details of age, sex, and mechanism of injury for prehospital trauma deaths in the Yorkshire Health Region in a 12 month period. Complete records were traced on 305 of 337 trauma deaths, 190 being recorded as dead on arrival of emergency services and 115 dead on arrival at hospital. In the group declared dead at the scene, three of the four assessors considered 93% of deaths to have been inevitable and only 2% as potential survivors (25% of this group sustaining inevitably fatal injuries such as brain avulsion or decapitation). In the group dead on arrival 81% were felt to be inevitable deaths and 5% potential survivors. There seems to be less scope for salvage of victims of trauma death in a British population than has been recorded in America, possibly due to a higher proportion of blunt trauma deaths here. Those who die in transit consist of a less severely injured group with a higher potential for survival.

Impact of Improved Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Trauma Care on the Reduction in Mortality from Trauma

From 1972 to 1982 there was a 23.9% decline in the number of deaths due to trauma in Nebraska. During this time, an improved emergency medical services (EMS) system was being implemented, including training of EMT's and paramedics, physician education in advanced trauma life support (ATLS), establishment of three helicopter transport services, and designation of trauma centers in the two most populous (of six) EMS regions. Highway safety programs alone could not account for the decline in trauma deaths, since there was almost as great a fall in nonvehicular (21.4%) as vehicular (26.4%) trauma deaths. The much larger decline in prehospital (28.3%) than in-hospital (17.3%) trauma deaths suggested a relationship between the improving EMS system and decreased mortality from trauma. We found that growth of the EMS system, as measured by the cumulative number of EMT's trained, correlated strongly with the decline in prehospital (r = 0.95; p less than 0.001), in-hospital (r = 0.84; p less than 0.001), total (r = 0.95; p less than 0.001), vehicular (r = 0.86; p less than 0.001), and nonvehicular (r = 0.93; p less than 0.001) trauma deaths. Our findings suggest that improvements in the statewide EMS system along with better hospital care have caused a significant decline in the number of trauma deaths over a 14-year period.