Prehabilitation Interventions Research Articles

Impact of Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation Interventions on Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay and Functional Capacity in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: While surgery is commonly regarded as the primary curative treatment for colorectal cancer, it could potentially be associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: Determining the pooled effect of exercise and multidisciplinary prehabilitation interventions on postoperative hospital length of stay and functional capacity in patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Web of Science databases from inception to November 2022. STUDY SELECTION: The original systematic search retrieved 2,005 studies. After removal of duplicates and screening by title and abstract, 77 eligible full‐text documents were evaluated for the final inclusion in the meta‐analysis. A total of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 5 non-randomized controlled trials and 3 uncontrolled before‐and‐after studies were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative hospital length of stay (in days), and functional capacity (assessed with the peak of oxygen consumption [VO2 peak] and 6 minutes walking test [6MWT]). RESULTS: The meta‐analysis was conducted on a total of 20 studies (3805 participants). RCTs and non-randomized controlled trials showed significant reductions on postoperative hospital length of stay (d = -0.10, nearly 2 days) and significant increments of VO2 peak (d = 0.27) and 6MWT (d = 0.31). Regarding the before‐and‐after studies, the pooled effect of multidisciplinary prehabilitation interventions was positively significant on VO2 peak (d = 0.29) and 6MWT (d = 0.29). There was no risk of publication bias (Egger's test: p > 0.05), being as 0.71 (from 0 to 1) on average. LIMITATIONS: There was a high between-studies heterogeneity, and several outcomes did not have the required number of studies for a desirable statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that multidisciplinary prehabilitation interventions might be effective at decreasing postoperative hospital length (nearly 2 days) of stay and improving functional capacity. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42022373982.

Research Perspective on: Impact of Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation Interventions on Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay and Functional Capacity in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Research Perspective on: Impact of Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation Interventions on Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay and Functional Capacity in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PREHAB FAI- Prehabilitation for patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome -Protocol for an assessor blinded randomised controlled feasibility study.

The past decade has seen an exponential growth of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Procedures such as hip arthroscopy have rapidly grown and become the standard of care for patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS). Although, the results of such procedures are encouraging, a large proportion of patients do not achieve optimal outcomes due to chronicity and deconditioning as a result of delay in diagnosis and increased waiting times amongst other factors. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials, moderate certainty evidence supported prehabilitation over standard care in optimising several domains including muscle strength, pain and health related quality of life in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical interventions. However, the role of prehabilitation in patients with FAI syndrome undergoing hip arthroscopy has received little attention. To evaluate the feasibility, suitability, acceptability and safety of a prehabilitation programme for FAI to inform a future definitive randomised control trial to assess effectiveness. A systematically developed prehabilitation intervention based on a literature review and international consensus will be utilised in this study. A mixed methodology encompassing a two-arm randomised parallel study alongside an embedded qualitative component will be used to answer the study objectives. Patients will be recruited from a tertiary referral NHS centre for young adult hip pathology in the UK. Patient reported outcomes such as iHOT-12, Brief Pain Inventory Scale (Short form), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Global Impression of Change score will be obtained alongside objective measurements such as Muscle Strength and Star Excursion Balance Test at various time points. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline (prior to prehabilitation intervention), after prehabilitation before surgery, and at 6 weeks+/- 4 weeks and 6 months +/- 4 weeks (planned primary endpoint for definitive RCT) postoperatively when participants attend the research site for clinical care and remotely at 12 months +/- 4 weeks postoperatively. Mean change and 95% CI, and effect size of outcome measures will be used to determine the sample size for a future RCT. For the qualitative component, in depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists and focus groups with participants will be conducted to assess the feasibility, suitability, and acceptability of the prehabilitation intervention using a predetermined success criteria. All qualitative data will be recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. This study will be first of its kind to evaluate a systematically developed prehabilitation intervention for patients with FAIS undergoing hip arthroscopy. This study will provide important preliminary data to inform feasibility of a definitive RCT in the future to evaluate effectiveness of a prehabilitation intervention. ISRCTN 15371248, 09/03/2023. Version 2.3, 26th June 2023.

Development and external validation of preoperative clinical prediction models for postoperative outcomes including preoperative aerobic fitness in patients approaching elective colorectal cancer surgery

IntroductionPreoperative aerobic fitness is associated with postoperative outcomes after elective colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. This study aimed to develop and externally validate two clinical prediction models incorporating a practical test to assess preoperative aerobic fitness to distinguish between patients with and without an increased risk for 1) postoperative complications and 2) a prolonged time to in-hospital recovery of physical functioning after elective colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Materials and methodsModels were developed using prospective data from 256 patients and externally validated using prospective data of 291 patients. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo. The modified Iowa level of assistance scale (mILAS) was used to determine time to postoperative in-hospital physical recovery. Aerobic fitness, age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, neoadjuvant treatment, surgical approach, tumour location, and preoperative haemoglobin level were potential predictors. Areas under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests evaluated predictive performance. ResultsAerobic fitness, sex, age, ASA, tumour location, and surgical approach were included in the final models. External validation of the model for complications and postoperative recovery presented moderate to fair discrimination (AUC 0.666 (0.598–0.733) and 0.722 (0.651–0.794), respectively) and good calibration. High sensitivity and high negative predictive values were observed in the lower predicted risk categories (<40 %). ConclusionBoth models identify patients with and without an increased risk of complications or a prolonged time to in-hospital physical recovery. They might be used for improving patient-tailored preoperative risk assessment and targeted and cost-effective application of prehabilitation interventions.

Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults. A common and costly intervention for the treatment of LSS is lumbar decompression with or without fusion (LSS surgery), which has mixed outcomes among patients. Prehabilitation is a strategy designed to optimize the consistency of positive surgical outcomes and promote patient self-efficacy, while attempting to mitigate postoperative complications. No efforts have investigated the prehabilitation strategies specifically for patients undergoing LSS surgery. To determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability by participants of a novel prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Feasibility study. Outpatient orthopedic clinic at an academic medical center. Patients at least 50 years of age, who were scheduled for LSS surgery between October 2020 and October 2021. PreOperative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE-LSS), is a novel multimodal, education-focused, time-efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) Educational booklet and video; (2) In-person physical therapy (PT) session; and (3) Telemedicine visit with a physiatrist. The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility and acceptability of intervention by participants. Key potential surgical outcomes were length of stay and discharge disposition. POSE-LSS was completed by all eligible participants enrolled (n = 15) indicating feasibility and acceptability. Potential effectiveness measures including length of stay and discharge disposition were positively associated with the POSE-LSS intervention. This study demonstrates that a novel prehabilitation intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears positively associated with important short-term measures of postoperative recovery that may impact the trajectory of patient care following LSS surgery.

Nutritional aspects of prehabilitation in adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplant.

Malnutrition, sarcopenia (low muscle mass), and physical frailty have gained increasing recognition in candidates for liver transplant (LT) as these conditions can impact postoperative functional capacity. Multidimensional prehabilitation programs have been proposed as a safe intervention in adults awaiting LT but the nutritional pillar of prehabilitation has been understudied. This review summarizes the nutritional recommendations for prehabilitation for individuals with cirrhosis awaiting LT. Three major aspects of nutritional prehabilitation are discussed: (1) Assess: Evaluate nutritional status and assess for malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty to guide the nutritional prehabilitation intervention intensity, increasing across universal, targeted, and specialist levels; (2) Intervene: Prescribe a nutritional prehabilitation intervention to meet established nutrition guidelines in cirrhosis with a targeted focus on improving nutritional status and muscle health; (3) Reassess: Follow-up based on the required intensity of nutritional care with as needed intervention adjustment. Topics covered in the review include nutritional care levels for prehabilitation, energy prescriptions across body mass index strata, detailed considerations around protein intake (amount, distribution, and quality), carbohydrate and fat intake, other nutritional considerations, and the potential role of dietary supplements and nutraceuticals. Future research is warranted to more accurately evaluate energy needs, evaluate emerging dietary supplementation strategies, and establish the role of nutraceuticals alongside food-based interventions. While the general principles of nutritional prehabilitation are ready for immediate application, future large-scale randomized controlled trials in this space will help to quantify the benefit that can be gained by transitioning the LT approach from passive "transplant waitlist time" to active "transplant preparation time."

Abstract 997: Bringing the first prehabilitation program to American Indian cancer patients

Abstract Purpose. American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) people have the worst cancer survival rates of any US racial group, are underrepresented in clinical trials and research, and have never been recruited for participation in any published prehabilitation (prehab) intervention conducted prior to cancer surgery. Description of Procedure. We are collaborating with tribal partners to design the first prehab translational clinical trial for AI patients diagnosed with obesity-related cancer, to be implemented prior to surgical resection of the tumor. Program components have been developed with community input through semi-structured interviews and guidance from the sponsoring tribal health facility, the San Carlos Apache Healthcare Corporation. Patients preparing for cancer surgery will engage in a 3-week multimodal intervention that entails home-based exercise, supervised fitness sessions, promotion of anti-inflammatory foods, and health education materials adapted for and by community members. Serum and tissue biomarkers, as well as lifestyle behavioral measures, will be compared pre and post intervention to assess responsiveness. In respect of tribal sovereignty, the experimental procedure includes protocol refinement and approval by the tribal health facility’s IRB and tribal council. Summary of Data. Our qualitative data reveal AI cancer survivors from the partnering tribal community have high interest in prehab and attest they would have participated if offered (100%). Their consensus feedback fashioned the specifics of the prehab translational clinical trial: 30 minutes daily walking, 60 minutes supervised resistance training twice weekly, 2 ounces walnut consumption daily, nutrition counseling, transportation assistance, and education/encouragement from staff and peers. Biospecimen sampling can be a sensitive topic for AI audiences, which we addressed early and found 75% of the interviewed survivors agreed to biospecimen collection without stipulation; this increased to 100% support once the rationale for biospecimens was explained. Conclusions: Published prehab studies in other populations administered for 3-5 weeks between diagnosis and surgery have shown improvements in functional capacity, attenuation of surgery-induced losses, alterations of inflammatory biomarkers, and patient safety. Our community-informed prehab translational clinical trial for AI patients is the first of its kind, and anticipated to demonstrate feasibility, patient acceptability, behavioral changes in lifestyle, and the potential to modulate inflammatory biomarkers. Citation Format: Jennifer Erdrich, Adriena Hernandez, Jennifer W. Bea, Cynthia A. Thomson. Bringing the first prehabilitation program to American Indian cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 997.

The impact of short-term multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity in patients with gynecologic malignancies during the perioperative period: A prospective study

PurposeTo explore the effect of a short-term, hospital-based, multimodal preoperative prehabilitation intervention on perioperative functional ability of patients with gynecological malignant tumors. MethodsAccording to the order in which they underwent surgery, 97 patients were divided into the control group (48 cases) and the intervention group (49 cases). The control group was given routine preoperative guidance, whereas the intervention group was given short-term multimodal prehabilitation guidance on the basis of the control group intervention. The 6-min walk test was performed on the day of admission to the hospital, the day before surgery, and the 30th day after surgery. ResultsCompared with the control group, the intervention group had significantly better 6-min walk distance and superior physical and psychological status on the day before surgery and the 30th day after surgery (P < 0.001). For three consecutive days after surgery, the quality of recovery in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001), and the first ambulation time and exhaust time were achieved earlier in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe preoperative intervention group showed improved preoperative exercise ability and reduced anxiety in patients with gynecological cancer. Furthermore, this intervention improved the overall health of patients and accelerated their postoperative recovery.

The Effect of Unimodal, Non-pharmacological, Preoperative Psychological Prehabilitation Interventions on Preoperative Anxiety and Stress: A Systematic Review

Abstract Background Prehabilitation is a novel clinical strategy to optimize patients’ health in the waiting period before surgery. Objectives This article aims to gather the evidence for the effectiveness of unimodal, non-pharmacological psychological prehabilitation interventions on preoperative anxiety and stress before surgery. Design This is a PRISMA-guided systematic review and narrative synthesis of randomized controlled trials. Methods The online databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched on March 20th 2023. The search strategy led to 13,667 records screened and five records of randomized controlled trials included for full-text analysis. A risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Results Significant reduction in preoperative anxiety was seen in three studies comprising 337 participants. Two studies did not find that unimodal psychological prehabilitation reduces preoperative anxiety. Only one study assessed preoperative stress and reported a significant reduction. Intervention types used included guided imagery, stress management training, virtual reality experience and computer cognitive behavioral therapy. Conclusions There is contradictory evidence whether unimodal, non-pharmacological psychological prehabilitation can reduce preoperative anxiety. There is little evidence that non-pharmacological prehabilitation can reduce preoperative stress. Suggestions to improve the research in this field are discussed.

Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients into routine health care: a realist review

BackgroundDespite evidence supporting the effectiveness of prehabilitation as a new preoperative care pathway to optimise perioperative outcomes, its implementation into routine health care is widely pending. Frail patients might particularly benefit from prehabilitation interventions, but facilitating and hindering factors need to be considered in the implementation process. Thus, our aim was to derive a programme theory on what prehabilitation programmes work for frail patients in what circumstances and why.MethodsFollowing Pawson’s realist review approach, preliminary programme theories on facilitators and barriers were established. General and topic-specific databases were searched systematically for facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients. Articles were included if they dealt with multimodal prehabilitation programmes prior to surgery in a frail population and if they contained information on facilitators and barriers during the implementation process in the full text. Based on these articles, refined programme theories were generated.ResultsFrom 2,609 unique titles, 34 were retained for the realist synthesis. Facilitating factors included the individualisation of prehabilitation programmes to meet the patients’ needs and abilities, multimodality, adaption to the local setting and health care system, endorsement by an ambassador and sharing of responsibilities among a multidisciplinary team. Central barriers for frail patients were transportation, lack of social support, and inadequate, overwhelming information provision.ConclusionsImplementing prehabilitation as a new care pathway for frail patients requires organisational readiness and adaptability to the local setting. On an individual level, a clear understanding of responsibilities and of the intervention’s goal among patients and providers are necessary. Added attention must be paid to the individualisation to fit the needs and restrictions of frail patients. This makes prehabilitation a resource-intense, but promising intervention for frail surgery patients.Trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42022335282).

Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery.

Cancer surgery is an essential treatment strategy but can disrupt patients' physical and psychological health. With worldwide demand for surgery expected to increase, this review aims to raise awareness of this global public health concern, present a stepwise framework for preoperative risk evaluation, and propose the adoption of personalised prehabilitation to mitigate risk. Perioperative medicine is a growing speciality that aims to improve clinical outcome by preparing patients for the stress associated with surgery. Preparation should begin at contemplation of surgery, with universal screening for established risk factors, physical fitness, nutritional status, psychological health, and, where applicable, frailty and cognitive function. Patients at risk should undergo a formal assessment with a qualified healthcare professional which informs meaningful shared decision-making discussion and personalised prehabilitation prescription incorporating, where indicated, exercise, nutrition, psychological support, 'surgery schools', and referral to existing local services. The foundational principles of prehabilitation can be adapted to local context, culture, and population. Clinical services should be co-designed with all stakeholders, including patient representatives, and require careful mapping of patient pathways and use of multi-disciplinary professional input. Future research should optimise prehabilitation interventions, adopting standardised outcome measures and robust health economic evaluation.

Preparing for colorectal surgery: a feasibility study of a novel web-based multimodal prehabilitation programme in Western Canada.

Prehabilitation for colorectal cancer has focused on exercise-based interventions that are typically designed by clinicians; however, no research has yet been patient-oriented. The aim of this feasibility study was to test a web-based multimodal prehabilitation intervention (known as PREP prehab) consisting of four components (physical activity, diet, smoking cessation, psychological support) co-designed with five patient partners. A longitudinal, two-armed (website without or with coaching support) feasibility study of 33 patients scheduled for colorectal surgery 2 weeks or more from consent (January-September 2021) in the province of British Columbia, Canada. Descriptive statistics analysed a health-related quality of life questionnaire (EQ5D-5L) at baseline (n = 25) and 3 months postsurgery (n = 21), and a follow-up patient satisfaction survey to determine the acceptability, practicality, demand for and potential efficacy in improving overall health. Patients had a mean age of 52 years (SD 14 years), 52% were female and they had a mean body mass index of 25 kg m-2 (SD 3.8 kg m-2). Only six patients received a Subjective Global Assessment for being at risk for malnutrition, with three classified as 'severely/moderately' malnourished. The majority (86%) of patients intended to use the prehabilitation website, and nearly three-quarters (71%) visited the website while waiting for surgery. The majority (76%) reported that information, tools and resources provided appropriate support, and 76% indicated they would recommend the PREP prehab programme. About three-quarters (76%) reported setting goals for lifestyle modification: 86% set healthy eating goals, 81% aimed to stay active and 57% sought to reduce stress once a week or more. No patients contacted the team to obtain health coaching, despite broad interest (71%) in receiving active support and 14% reporting they received 'active support'. This web-based multimodal prehabilitation programme was acceptable, practical and well-received by all colorectal surgery patients who viewed the patient-oriented multimodal website. The feasibility of providing active health coaching support requires further investigation.

Measures of preoperative anxiety: Part two.

The current literature indicates that routine evaluation of preoperative anxiety, its determinants, and patient-specific concerns is universally advocated. This aligns with the increasingly acknowledged importance of prehabilitation - a comprehensive process preparing patients for surgery. A crucial component of prehabilitation is assessing patients' mental health. Recommendations for psychological evaluations in prehabilitation encompass, inter alia, determining the severity of anxiety. This work builds on a 2019 article, which presented scales for preoperative anxiety assessment: the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This article extends the possibilities of preoperative anxiety assessment by introducing four additional methods: the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ), the Anxiety Specific to Surgery Questionnaire (ASSQ), the Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ), and Anesthesia- and Surgery-dependent Preoperative Anxiety (ASPA). The authors provide comprehensive details on these instruments, including scoring, interpretation, availability, and usefulness both in scientific research and clinical practice. The authors also provide the data on the availability of Polish versions of the presented methods and preliminary data on the reliability of SFQ in patients awaiting cardiac surgery. This review seems relevant for professionals in multiple disciplines, including anesthesiology, surgery, clinical psychology, nursing, primary care and notably prehabilitation. It emphasizes the necessity of individualizing anxiety assessment and acknowledging patient subjectivity, which the presented methods facilitate through a thorough evaluation of specific patient concerns. The literature review also identifies concerns and future research avenues in this area. The importance of qualitative studies and those evaluating prehabilitation intervention is emphasized.

Multimodal Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Surgery: A Feasibility Study.

Elective treatment options for aortic abdominal aneurysms include open repair or the less-invasive endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Recovery from EVAR is generally considered easier and faster than open repair. Despite this, EVAR remains a major procedure, and average return to preoperative quality of life is at least 3 months. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and feasibility of multimodal prehabilitation, a multidisciplinary preoperative optimization intervention, in patients undergoing EVAR and its impact on perioperative functional capacity and quality of life. Candidates for EVAR with an infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm <7.5cm were invited to participate in a 6-week multimodal prehabilitation program that included (1) supervised and home-based exercise, (2) nutritional support, (3) psychosocial support, and (4) smoking cessation. Functional capacity and quality of life were assessed at baseline, before surgery and 6 weeks postoperatively. Recruitment rate, safety, and compliance were also assessed. A total of 24 patients were included, 17 males (70%) and 7 females (30%). No adverse events occurred during the program. Compliance to each component of the program (median [Q1-Q3]) was 66% [67] for supervised training, 100% [67] for home-based training, and 100% [100] for nutrition. The multimodal prehabilitation program elicited a significant increase in functional capacity and quality of life preoperatively. Multimodal prehabilitation for patients awaiting EVAR is feasible and safe. Multimodal prehabilitation improves both functional capacity and quality of life preoperatively. Further research is needed to assess the impact of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative quality of life and functional capacity. Multimodal prehabilitation is safe and feasible in patients awaiting endovascular aneurysm repair. The importance of this finding is that multimodal prehabilitation can be safely delivered preoperatively in patients awaiting EVAR. Although further research is needed, multimodal prehabilitation seems to improve preoperative functional capacity and quality of life. This could have an impact for the future implementation of prehabilitation interventions in order to increase functional reserve and quality of life preoperatively so that this high-risk population can cope better with the surgical stress and return to their normal life faster postoperatively.

One-Year Follow-Up after Multimodal Prehabilitation Interventions in Radical Cystectomy.

Multimodal prehabilitation is the process of enhancing physiological, nutritional, and psychological resilience to increase patients' functional capacity before major cancer surgery and aims to empower the patient to withstand the pending stress of major surgery and ultimately to improve long-term outcomes. The effect of physical prehabilitation to counteract the physical decline in surgical cancer patients has been documented; however, long-term results have not yet been published. This follow-up study aims to evaluate 1-year results on the efficacy of physical prehabilitation after bladder cancer surgery. The efficacy of prehabilitation was measured over the course of 1 year in 107 patients randomized to (1) pre- and rehabilitation or (2) standard care divided by n = 50 in the intervention (I) and n = 57 in the standard group (S). Physical function was measured by muscle leg power, and nutritional status was expressed with handgrip strength. Prehabilitation in major bladder cancer surgery can significantly improve physical function with 19.8 Watt/kg (p = 0.04), lean body mass (p = 0.047) and body cell mass (p = 0.03), and regained nutritional status one year after surgery. The results demonstrate that the restoration of physical function is vital to a full recovery.

Exercise and Nutrition Interventions for Prehabilitation in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Cancers: A Narrative Review.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers constitute over 25% of global cancer cases annually, with hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancers presenting particularly poor prognosis and challenging surgical treatments. While advancements in clinical care have improved post-operative outcomes over time, surgery for HPB cancers remains associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with HPB cancer are often older, diagnosed at later stages, and have a higher prevalence of co-morbid conditions, leading to reduced life expectancy, suboptimal post-operative recovery, and increased recurrence risk. Exercise and nutrition interventions have emerged as safe non-pharmacological strategies to enhance clinical outcomes among cancer survivors, but their potential in the pre-operative period for patients with HPB cancer remains underexplored. This narrative review evaluates existing evidence on exercise and nutritional interventions during pre-operative prehabilitation for HPB cancer populations, focusing on clinically relevant post-operative outcomes related to frailty and malnutrition. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies utilizing a prehabilitation intervention in HPB cancer populations with exercise and nutritional components. The currently available evidence suggests that incorporating exercise and nutrition into prehabilitation programs offers a critical opportunity to enhance post-operative outcomes, mitigate the risk of comorbidities, and support overall survivorship among HPB cancer populations. This review underscores the need for further research to optimize the timing, duration, and components of pre-operative prehabilitation programs, emphasizing patient-centered, multidisciplinary approaches in this evolving field.

Prehabilitation programs - a systematic review of the economic evidence.

Prehabilitation, which involves improving a patient's physical and psychological condition before surgery, has shown potential benefits but has yet to be extensively studied from an economic perspective. To address this gap, a systematic review was conducted to summarize existing economic evaluations of prehabilitation interventions. The PRISMA Protocols 2015 checklist was followed. Over 16,000 manuscripts were reviewed, and 99 reports on preoperative interventions and screening tests were identified, of which 12 studies were included in this analysis. The costs are expressed in Pounds (GBP, £) and adjusted for inflation to December 2022. The studies were conducted in Western countries, focusing on specific surgical subspecialties. While the interventions and study designs varied, most studies demonstrated cost savings in the intervention group compared to the control group. Additionally, all cost-effectiveness analysis studies favored the intervention group. However, the review also identified several limitations. Many studies had a moderate or high risk of bias, and critical information such as time horizons and discount rates were often missing. Important components like heterogeneity, distributional effects, and uncertainty were frequently lacking as well. The misclassification of economic evaluation types highlighted a lack of knowledge among physicians in prehabilitation research. This review reveals a lack of robust evidence regarding the economics of prehabilitation programs for surgical patients. This suggests a need for further research with rigorous methods and accurate definitions.

Does prehabilitation before esophagectomy improve postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with high morbidity. It remains unclear whether prehabilitation, a strategy aimed at optimizing patients' physical and mental functioning prior to surgery, improves postoperative outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of prehabilitation on post-operative outcomes after esophagectomy. Data sources included Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro, with information from 1 January 2000 to 5 August 2023. The analysis included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared prehabilitation interventions to standard care prior to esophagectomy. A random effects model was used to generate a pooled estimate for pairwise meta-analysis, meta-analysis of proportions, and meta-analysis of means. A total of 1803 patients were included with 584 in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1219 in observational studies. In the randomized evidence, there were no significant differences between prehabilitation and control in the odds of postoperative pneumonia (15.0 vs. 18.9%, odds ratio (OR) 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66;1.72]) or pulmonary complications (14 vs. 25.6%, OR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.32;1.45]). In the observational data, there was a reduction in both postoperative pneumonia (22.5 vs. 32.9%, OR 0.48 [95% CI: 0.28;0.83]) and pulmonary complications (26.1 vs. 52.3%, OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.17;0.75]) with prehabilitation. Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (days), operative mortality, and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) did not differ between groups in both the randomized data and observational data. Prehabilitation demonstrated reductions in postoperative pneumonia and pulmonary complications in observational studies, but not RCTs. The overall certainty of these findings is limited by the low quality of the available evidence.

OGC P15 Analysing the Impact of Prehabilitation on Patient Outcomes in Oesophagogastric Cancer Surgery: Combined Data from Four prospective Clinical Trials performed across the UK and Ireland

Abstract Background Prehabilitation is increasingly being used in patients undergoing multi-modality treatment for oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer. Most studies to date have been small, single centre trials lacking statistical power. The results of larger randomised trials are still awaited. There remain considerable uncertainties regarding the outcome measures that may benefit from prehabilitation, the exact nature of the intervention and the mechanisms behind any observed benefit. This collaborative study sought to combine data from four prospective clinical prehabilitation trials performed in the UK and Ireland to determine the overall impact of the intervention on patient outcomes following oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Methods Anonymised data from four prospective prehabilitation trials conducted in the UK and Ireland (Southampton, Guildford, Dublin, and St Thomas’, London) in patients undergoing multi-modality treatment for oesophagogastric cancer was combined. The studies included two randomized and two non-randomized clinical trials. The primary outcome measures were differences in complications and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were changes in BMI, fitness (VO2 max), chemotherapy completion rates and tumour regression. In total, 180 patients were included from four studies, with 93 patients in the prehabilitation group and 87 patients in the control group. Results Severe complications (Clavien Dindo &amp;gt;=3) were observed less frequently in the prehabilitation group (19% vs 34%; p=0.038). Hospital length of stay also favoured prehabilitation (10 vs 11 days) albeit not statistically significant. Chemotherapy completion rates were significantly higher following prehabilitation (96% vs 63%; p&amp;lt;0.001). There were non-significant improvements in VO2 max change following neo-adjuvant therapy (delta 1.35 vs 2.39; p=0.25), anaerobic threshold change (delta 1.20 vs 2.20; p=0.11) and chemotherapy response (Mandard 1-3 57% vs 44%; p=0.178). Conclusions Despite some limitations in terms of heterogeneity of study methodology and prehabilitation interventions, this study has highlighted a willingness of individual units to collaborate and tangible clinical benefits across a range of outcome measures in a larger OG patient population. Current initiatives to agree national standards for delivering prehabilitation and the results of on-going trials will help to further refine this important intervention and expand the evidence base to support the widespread adoption and implementation of prehabilitation programs.

OGC P46 A consensus opinion on the best prehabilitation strategies for Upper GI cancer patients

Abstract Background Upper GI (UGI) cancer patients face substantial physical and functional challenges which can compromise postoperative recovery. Prehabilitation, a proactive multidisciplinary intervention, offers a promising approach to optimize patient outcomes. This Delphi exercise aims to gather a consensus on the effectiveness of various prehabilitation strategies and interventions in improving functional capacity, reducing treatment-related complications, and enhancing quality of life among UGI cancer patients. Methods We performed a Delphi exercise in the form of an online survey emailed to a group of surgeons, anaesthetists, specialist nurses and allied healthcare professionals involved in the perioperative care of UGI cancer patients. A 2-staged iterative process was used to gather consensus on clinical practice and expert opinion. In the second round the survey was refined to evaluate specific strategies of prehabilitation more closely. Results In the first round, 14 statements were evaluated in addition to basic demographic data, information about the unit and clinician experience. 161 responses were collected from surgeons, anaesthetists, specialist nurses and allied healthcare professionals. Consensus was reached on formal assessment of patient fitness pre-operatively. However no consensus was achieved in the best method for doing so. In the second round we evaluated 22 statements after refining the questions to specifically target prehabilitation exercises and formal fitness assessments available for the perioperative care of UGI cancer patients. Conclusions Prehabilitation interventions hold significant potential in optimizing outcomes and improving the quality of life for UGI cancer patients undergoing major surgery. This Delphi exercise provides multidisciplinary expert consensus statements which can help guide clinicians in day-to-day practice as well as provide a basis for future guidelines and recommendations.