Preglomerular Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Research Articles

Adenosine receptors regulate exosome production

Exosomes, small-sized extracellular vesicles, carry components of the purinergic pathway. The production by cells of exosomes carrying this pathway remains poorly understood. Here, we asked whether type 1, 2A, or 2B adenosine receptors (A1Rs, A2ARs, and A2BRs, respectively) expressed by producer cells are involved in regulating exosome production. Preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (PGVSMCs) were isolated from wildtype, A1R-/-, A2AR-/-, and A2BR-/- rats, and exosome production was quantified under normal or metabolic stress conditions. Exosome production was also measured in various cancer cells treated with pharmacologic agonists/antagonists of A1Rs, A2ARs, and A2BRs in the presence or absence of metabolic stress or cisplatin. Functional activity of exosomes was determined in Jurkat cell apoptosis assays. In PGVSMCs, A1R and A2AR constrained exosome production under normal conditions (p = 0.0297; p = 0.0409, respectively), and A1R, A2AR, and A2BR constrained exosome production under metabolic stress conditions. Exosome production from cancer cells was reduced (p = 0.0028) by the selective A2AR agonist CGS 21680. These exosomes induced higher levels of Jurkat apoptosis than exosomes from untreated cells or cells treated with A1R and A2BR agonists (p = 0.0474). The selective A2AR antagonist SCH 442416 stimulated exosome production under metabolic stress or cisplatin treatment, whereas the selective A2BR antagonist MRS 1754 reduced exosome production. Our findings indicate that A2ARs suppress exosome release in all cell types examined, whereas effects of A1Rs and A2BRs are dependent on cell type and conditions. Pharmacologic targeting of cancer with A2AR antagonists may inadvertently increase exosome production from tumor cells.

DPP4 Inhibition, NPY1-36, PYY1-36, SDF-1α, and a Hypertensive Genetic Background Conspire to Augment Cell Proliferation and Collagen Production: Effects That Are Abolished by Low Concentrations of 2-Methoxyestradiol.

By reducing their metabolism, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibition (DPP4I) enhances the effects of numerous peptides including neuropeptide Y1–36 (NPY1–36), peptide YY1–36 (PYY1–36), and SDF-1α. Studies show that separately NPY1–36, PYY1–36 and SDF-1α stimulate proliferation of, and collagen production by, cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (PGVSMCs), and glomerular mesangial cells (GMCs), particularly in cells isolated from genetically hypertensive rats. Whether certain combinations of these factors, in the absence or presence of DPP4I, are more profibrotic than others is unknown. Here we contrasted 24 different combinations of conditions (DPP4I, hypertensive genotype and physiologic levels [3 nM] of NPY1–36, PYY1–36, or SDF-1α) on proliferation of, and [3H]-proline incorporation by, CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs. In all three cell types, the various treatment conditions differentially increased proliferation and [3H]-proline incorporation, with a hypertensive genotype + DPP4I + NPY1–36 + SDF-1α being the most efficacious combination. Although the effects of this four-way combination were similar in male versus female CFs, physiologic (1 nM) concentrations of 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME; nonestrogenic metabolite of 17β-estradiol), abolished the effects of this combination in both male and female CFs. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs are differentially activated by various combinations of NPY1–36, PYY1–36, SDF-1α, a hypertensive genetic background and DPP4I. We hypothesize that as these progrowth conditions accumulate, a tipping point would be reached that manifests in the long term as organ fibrosis and that 2ME would obviate any profibrotic effects of DPP4I, even under the most profibrotic conditions (i.e., hypertensive genotype with high NPY1–36 + SDF-1α levels and low 2ME levels).SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThis work elucidates combinations of factors that could contribute to long-term profibrotic effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and suggests a novel drug combination that could prevent any potential profibrotic effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors while augmenting the protective effects of this class of antidiabetic agents.

SDF-1α (Stromal Cell-Derived Factor 1α) Induces Cardiac Fibroblasts, Renal Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cells, and Glomerular Mesangial Cells to Proliferate, Cause Hypertrophy, and Produce Collagen.

BackgroundActivated cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (PGVSMCs), and glomerular mesangial cells (GMCs) proliferate, cause hypertrophy, and produce collagen; in this way, activated CFs contribute to cardiac fibrosis, and activated PGVSMCs and GMCs promote renal fibrosis. In heart and kidney diseases, SDF‐1α (stromal cell‐derived factor 1α; endogenous CXCR4 [C‐X‐C motif chemokine receptor 4] receptor agonist) levels are often elevated; therefore, it is important to know whether and how the SDF‐1α/CXCR4 axis activates CFs, PGVSMCs, or GMCs.Methods and ResultsHere we investigated whether SDF‐1α activates CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs to proliferate, hypertrophy, or produce collagen. DPP4 (dipeptidyl peptidase 4) inactivates SDF‐1α and previous experiments show that growth‐promoting peptides have greater effects in cells from genetically‐hypertensive animals. Therefore, we performed experiments in the absence and presence of sitagliptin (DPP4 inhibitor) and in cells from normotensive Wistar–Kyoto rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Our studies show (1) that spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar–Kyoto rat CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs express CXCR4 receptors and DPP4 activity; (2) that chronic treatment with physiologically relevant concentrations of SDF‐1α causes concentration‐dependent increases in the proliferation (cell number) and hypertrophy (3H‐leucine incorporation) of and collagen production (3H‐proline incorporation) by CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs; (3) that sitagliptin augments these effects of SDF‐1α; (4) that interactions between SDF‐1α and sitagliptin are greater in spontaneously hypertensive rat cells; (5) that CXCR4 antagonism (AMD3100) blocks all effects of SDF‐1α; and (6) that SDF‐1α/CXCR4 signal transduction likely involves the RACK1 (receptor for activated C kinase 1)/Gβγ/PLC (phospholipase C)/PKC (protein kinase C) signaling complex.ConclusionsThe SDF‐1α/CXCR4 axis drives proliferation and hypertrophy of and collagen production by CFs, PGVSMCs, and GMCs, particularly in cells from genetically hypertensive animals and when DPP4 is inhibited.

TRPV4 channels contribute to renal myogenic autoregulation in neonatal pigs.

Myogenic response, a phenomenon in which resistance size arteries and arterioles swiftly constrict or dilate in response to an acute elevation or reduction, respectively, in intravascular pressure is a key component of renal autoregulation mechanisms. Although it is well established that the renal system is functionally immature in neonates, mechanisms that regulate neonatal renal blood flow (RBF) remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that members of the transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) channels are molecular components of renal myogenic constriction in newborns. We show that unlike TRPV1-3, TRPV4 channels are predominantly expressed in neonatal pig preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) elevation induced by osmotic cell swelling was attenuated by TRPV4, L-type Ca2+, and stretch-activated Ca2+ channel blockers but not phospholipase A2 inhibitor. Blockade of TRPV4 channels reversed steady-state myogenic tone and inhibited pressure-induced membrane depolarization, [Ca2+]i elevation, and constriction in distal interlobular arteries. A step increase in arterial pressure induced efficient autoregulation of renal cortical perfusion and total RBF in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated neonatal pigs. Moreover, intrarenal arterial infusion of the TRPV4 channel blockers HC 067047 and RN 1734 attenuated renal autoregulation in the pigs. These data suggest that renal myogenic autoregulation is functional in neonates. Our findings also indicate that TRPV4 channels are mechanosensors in neonatal pig preglomerular vascular SMCs and contribute to renal myogenic autoregulation.

RACK1 regulates angiotensin II-induced contractions of SHR preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells.

The preglomerular microcirculation of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) is hypersensitive to angiotensin (ANG) II, and studies have shown that this is likely due to enhanced coincident signaling between G protein subunits αq (Gαq; released by ANG II) and βγ (Gβγ; released by Gi-coupled receptors) to active phospholipase C (PLC). Here we investigated the molecular basis for the enhanced coincident signaling between Gβγ and Gαq in SHR preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (PGVSMCs). Because receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1; a scaffolding protein) organizes interactions between Gβγ, Gαq, and PLC, we included RACK1 in this investigation. Cell fractionation studies demonstrated increased levels of membrane (but not cytosolic) Gβ, Gαq, PLCβ3, and RACK1 in SHR PGVSMCs compared with Wistar-Kyoto rat PGVSMCs. In SHR PGVSMCs, coimmunoprecipitation demonstrated RACK1 binding to Gβ and PLCβ3, but only at cell membranes. Pertussis toxin (which blocks Gβγ) and U73122 (which blocks PLC) reduced membrane RACK1; however, RACK1 knockdown (shRNA) did not affect membrane levels of Gβ, Gαq, or PLCβ3 In a novel gel contraction assay, RACK1 knockdown in SHR PGVSMCs attenuated contractions to ANG II and abrogated the ability of neuropeptide Y (which signals via Gβγ) to enhance ANG II-induced contractions. We conclude that in SHR PGVSMCs the enlarged pool of Gβγ and PLCβ3 recruits RACK1 to membranes and RACK1 then organizes signaling. Consequently, knockdown of RACK1 prevents coincident signaling between ANG II and the Gi pathway. This is the first study to implicate RACK1 in vascular smooth muscle cell contraction and suggests that RACK1 inhibitors could be effective cardiovascular drugs.

New Role of P/Q-type Voltage-gated Calcium Channels: From Transmitter Release to Contraction of Renal Vasculature.

Voltage-gated calcium channels are important for the depolarization-evoked contraction of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), with L-type channels being the classical channel involved in this mechanism. However, it has been demonstrated that the CaV2.1 subunit, which encodes a neuronal isoform of the voltage-gated calcium channels (P/Q-type), is also expressed and contributes functionally to contraction of renal blood vessels in both mice and humans. Furthermore, preglomerular vascular SMCs and aortic SMCs coexpress L-, P-, and Q-type calcium channels within the same cell. Calcium channel blockers are widely used as pharmacological treatments. However, calcium channel antagonists vary in their selectivity for the various calcium channel subtypes, and the functional contribution from P/Q-type channels as compared with L-type should be considered. Confirming the presence of P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channels in other types of vascular SMCs could be important when investigating phenomena such as hypertension, migraine, and other diseases known to involve SMCs and voltage-gated calcium channels. The purpose of this review was to give a short overview of the possible roles of P/Q-type calcium channels within the vascular system with special focus on the renal vasculature.

RGS4 inhibits angiotensin II signaling and macrophage localization during renal reperfusion injury independent of vasospasm

Vascular inflammation is a major contributor to the severity of acute kidney injury. In the context of vasospasm-independent reperfusion injury we studied the potential anti-inflammatory role of the Gα-related RGS protein, RGS4. Transgenic RGS4 mice were resistant to 25 minute injury, although post-ischemic renal arteriolar diameter was equal to the wild type early after injury. A 10 minute unilateral injury was performed to study reperfusion without vasospasm. Eighteen hours after injury blood flow was decreased in the inner cortex of wild type mice with preservation of tubular architecture. Angiotensin II levels in the kidneys of wild type and transgenic mice were elevated in a sub-vasoconstrictive range 12 and 18 hours after injury. Angiotensin II stimulated pre-glomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) to secrete the macrophage chemoattractant, RANTES; a process decreased by angiotensin II R2 (AT2) inhibition. However, RANTES increased when RGS4 expression was suppressed implicating Gα protein activation in an AT2-RGS4-dependent pathway. RGS4 function, specific to VSMC, was tested in a conditional VSMC-specific RGS4 knockout showing high macrophage density by T2 MRI compared to transgenic and non-transgenic mice after the 10 minute injury. Arteriolar diameter of this knockout was unchanged at successive time points after injury. Thus, RGS4 expression, specific to renal VSMC, inhibits angiotensin II-mediated cytokine signaling and macrophage recruitment during reperfusion, distinct from vasomotor regulation.

NADPH oxidase in the renal microvasculature is a primary target for blood pressure-lowering effects by inorganic nitrate and nitrite.

Renal oxidative stress and nitric oxide (NO) deficiency are key events in hypertension. Stimulation of a nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway with dietary nitrate reduces blood pressure, but the mechanisms or target organ are not clear. We investigated the hypothesis that inorganic nitrate and nitrite attenuate reactivity of renal microcirculation and blood pressure responses to angiotensin II (ANG II) by modulating nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity and NO bioavailability. Nitrite in the physiological range (10(-7)-10(-5) mol/L) dilated isolated perfused renal afferent arterioles, which were associated with increased NO. Contractions to ANG II (34%) and simultaneous NO synthase inhibition (56%) were attenuated by nitrite (18% and 26%). In a model of oxidative stress (superoxide dismutase-1 knockouts), abnormal ANG II-mediated arteriolar contractions (90%) were normalized by nitrite (44%). Mechanistically, effects of nitrite were abolished by NO scavenger and xanthine oxidase inhibitor, but only partially attenuated by inhibiting soluble guanylyl cyclase. Inhibition of NADPH oxidase with apocynin attenuated ANG II-induced contractility (35%) similar to that of nitrite. In the presence of nitrite, no further effect of apocynin was observed, suggesting NADPH oxidase as a possible target. In preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells and kidney cortex, nitrite reduced both basal and ANG II-induced NADPH oxidase activity. These effects of nitrite were also abolished by xanthine oxidase inhibition. Moreover, supplementation with dietary nitrate (10(-2) mol/L) reduced renal NADPH oxidase activity and attenuated ANG II-mediated arteriolar contractions and hypertension (99±2-146±2 mm Hg) compared with placebo (100±3-168±3 mm Hg). In conclusion, these novel findings position NADPH oxidase in the renal microvasculature as a prime target for blood pressure-lowering effects of inorganic nitrate and nitrite.

Adenosine A1 receptor-dependent and independent pathways in modulating renal vascular responses to angiotensin II.

Renal afferent arterioles are the effector site for autoregulation of glomerular perfusion and filtration. There is synergistic interaction between angiotensin II (ANG II) and adenosine (Ado) in regulating arteriolar contraction; however, the mechanisms are not clear. In this context, this study investigated the contribution of A1 receptor-dependent and independent signalling mechanisms. Isolated perfused afferent arterioles from transgenic mice (A1 (+/+) and A1 (-/-) ) were used for vascular reactivity studies. Cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) were used for phosphorylation studies of signalling proteins that induce arteriolar contraction. Maximal arteriolar contraction to ANG II was attenuated in A1 (-/-) (22%) compared with A1 (+/+) (40%). Simultaneous incubation with low-dose ado (10(-8) molL(-1) ) enhanced ANG II-induced contraction in A1 (+/+) (58%), but also in A1 (-/-) (42%). An ado transporter inhibitor (NBTI) abolished this synergistic effect in A1 (-/-) , but not in wild-type mice. Incubation with Ado+ANG II increased p38 phosphorylation in aortic VSMC from both genotypes, but treatment with NBTI only blocked phosphorylation in A1 (-/-) . Combination of ANG II+Ado also increased MLC phosphorylation in A1 (+/+) but not significantly in A1 (-/-) , and NBTI had no effects. In agreement, Ado+ANG II-induced phosphorylation of p38 and MLC in rat pre-glomerular VSMC was not affected by NBTI. However, during pharmacological inhibition of the A1 receptor simultaneous treatment with NBTI reduced phosphorylation of both p38 and MLC to control levels. Interaction between ANG II and Ado in VSMC normally involves A1 receptor signalling, but this can be compensated by receptor independent actions that phosphorylate p38 MAPK and MLC.

Connexin 40 is dispensable for vascular renin cell recruitment but is indispensable for vascular baroreceptor control of renin secretion.

Defects of the gap junction protein connexin 40 (Cx40) in renin-secreting cells (RSCs) of the kidney lead to a shift of the localization of RSCs from the media layer of afferent arterioles to the periglomerular interstitium. The dislocation of RSCs goes in parallel with elevated plasma renin levels, impaired pressure control of renin secretion, and hypertension. The reasons for the extravascular shift of RSCs and the blunted pressure regulation of renin secretion caused by the absence of Cx40 are still unclear. We have therefore addressed the question if Cx40 is essential for the metaplastic transformation of preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) into RSCs and if Cx40 is essential for the pressure control of renin secretion from RSCs located in the media layer of afferent arterioles. For our study, we used mice lacking the angiotensin II type 1A (AT1A) receptors, which display a prominent and reversible salt-sensitive metaplastic transformation of SMCs into RSCs. This mouse line was crossed with Cx40-deficient mice to obtain AT1A and Cx40 double deleted mice. The kidneys of AT1A (-/-)Cx40(-/-) mice kept on normal salt (0.3 %) displayed RSCs both in the inner media layer of preglomerular vessels and in the periglomerular interstitium. In contrast to hypotensive AT1A (-/-) (mean bp syst 112 mmHg) and hypertensive Cx40(-/-) (mean bp syst 160 mmHg) mice AT1A (-/-)Cx40(-/-) mice were normotensive(mean bp syst 130 mmHg). Pressure regulation of renin secretion from isolated kidneys was normal in AT1A (-/-) mice, but was absent in AT1A (-/-)Cx40(-/-) mice alike in Cx40(-/-) mice. Low-salt diet (0.02 %) increased RSC numbers in the media layer, whilst high-salt diet (4 %) caused disappearance of RSCs in the media layer but not in the periglomerular interstitium. Blood pressure was clearly salt sensitive both in AT1A (-/-) and in AT1A (-/-)Cx40(-/-) mice but was shifted to higher pressure values in the latter genotype. Our data indicate that Cx40 is not a requirement for intramural vascular localization of RSCs nor for reversible metaplastic transformation of SMCs into RSCs. Therefore, the ectopic localization of RSCs in Cx40(-/-) kidneys is more likely due to a disturbed intercellular communication rather than being the result of chronic overactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system or hypertension. Moreover, our findings suggest that Cx40 is a requirement for the pressure control of renin secretion irrespective of the localization of RSCs.

Role of 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase in the renal 2',3'-cAMP-adenosine pathway.

Energy depletion increases the renal production of 2',3'-cAMP (a positional isomer of 3',5'-cAMP that opens mitochondrial permeability transition pores) and 2',3'-cAMP is converted to 2'-AMP and 3'-AMP, which in turn are metabolized to adenosine. Because the enzymes involved in this "2',3'-cAMP-adenosine pathway" are unknown, we examined whether 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase (CNPase) participates in the renal metabolism of 2',3'-cAMP. Western blotting and real-time PCR demonstrated expression of CNPase in rat glomerular mesangial, preglomerular vascular smooth muscle and endothelial, proximal tubular, thick ascending limb and collecting duct cells. Real-time PCR established the expression of CNPase in human glomerular mesangial, proximal tubular and vascular smooth muscle cells; and the level of expression of CNPase was greater than that for phosphodiesterase 4 (major enzyme for the metabolism of 3',5'-cAMP). Overexpression of CNPase in rat preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells increased the metabolism of exogenous 2',3'-cAMP to 2'-AMP. Infusions of 2',3'-cAMP into isolated CNPase wild-type (+/+) kidneys increased renal venous 2'-AMP, and this response was diminished by 63% in CNPase knockout (-/-) kidneys, whereas the conversion of 3',5'-cAMP to 5'-AMP was similar in CNPase +/+ vs. -/- kidneys. In CNPase +/+ kidneys, energy depletion (metabolic poisons) increased kidney tissue levels of adenosine and its metabolites (inosine, hypoxanthine, xanthine, and uric acid) without accumulation of 2',3'-cAMP. In contrast, in CNPase -/- kidneys, energy depletion increased kidney tissue levels of 2',3'-cAMP and abolished the increase in adenosine and its metabolites. In conclusion, kidneys express CNPase, and renal CNPase mediates in part the renal 2',3'-cAMP-adenosine pathway.

ROCK/NF-κB axis-dependent augmentation of angiotensinogen by angiotensin II in primary-cultured preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells

In angiotensin II (ANG II)-dependent hypertension, the augmented intrarenal ANG II constricts the renal microvasculature and stimulates Rho kinase (ROCK), which modulates vascular contractile responses. Rho may also stimulate angiotensinogen (AGT) expression in preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), but this has not been established. Therefore, the aims of this study were to determine the direct interactions between Rho and ANG II in regulating AGT and other renin-angiotensin system (RAS) components and to elucidate the roles of the ROCK/NF-κB axis in the ANG II-induced AGT augmentation in primary cultures of preglomerular VSMCs. We first demonstrated that these preglomerular VSMCs express renin, AGT, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and ANG II type 1 (AT1) receptors. Furthermore, incubation with ANG II (100 pmol/l for 24 h) increased AGT mRNA (1.42 ± 0.03, ratio to control) and protein (1.68 ± 0.05, ratio to control) expression levels, intracellular ANG II levels, and NF-κB activity. In contrast, the ANG II treatment did not alter AT1a and AT1b mRNA levels in the cells. Treatment with H-1152 (ROCK inhibitor, 10 nmol/l) and ROCK1 small interfering (si) RNA suppressed the ANG II-induced AGT augmentation and the upregulation and translocalization of p65 into nuclei. Functional studies showed that ROCK exerted a greater influence on afferent arteriole responses to ANG II in rats subjected to chronic ANG II infusions. These results indicate that ROCK is involved in NF-κB activation and the ROCK/NF-κB axis contributes to ANG II-induced AGT upregulation, leading to intracellular ANG II augmentation.

Regulation of cell proliferation by the guanosine-adenosine mechanism: role of adenosine receptors

A recent study (American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology 304:C406–C421, 2013) suggests that extracellular guanosine increases extracellular adenosine by modifying the disposition of extracellular adenosine (“guanosine–adenosine mechanism”) and that the guanosine–adenosine mechanism is not mediated by classical adenosine transport systems (SLC28 and SLC29 families) nor by classical adenosine-metabolizing enzymes. The present investigation had two aims (1) to test the hypothesis that the “guanosine–adenosine mechanism” affects cell proliferation; and (2) to determine whether the transporters SLC19A1, SLC19A2, SLC19A3, or SLC22A2 (known to carrier guanosine analogs) might be responsible for the guanosine–adenosine mechanism. In the absence of added adenosine, guanosine had little effect on the proliferation of coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells (vascular conduit cells) or preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (vascular resistance cells). However, in the presence of added adenosine (3 or 10 μmol/L), guanosine (10–100 μmol/L) decreased proliferation of both cell types, thus resulting in a highly significant (P < 0.000001) interaction between guanosine and adenosine on cell proliferation. The guanosine–adenosine interaction on cell proliferation was abolished by 1,3-dipropyl-8-(p-sulfophenyl)xanthine (adenosine receptor antagonist). Guanosine (30 μmol/L) increased extracellular levels of adenosine when adenosine (3 μmol/L) was added to the medium. This effect was not reproduced by high concentrations of methotrexate (100 μmol/L), thiamine (1000 μmol/L), chloroquine (1000 μmol/L), or acyclovir (10,000 μmol/L), archetypal substrates for SLC19A1, SLC19A2, SLC19A3, and SLC22A2, respectively; and guanosine still increased adenosine levels in the presence of these compounds. In conclusion, the guanosine–adenosine mechanism affects cell proliferation and is not mediated by SLC19A1, SLC19A2, SLC19A3, or SLC22A2.

Dueling nucleosides: cross-regulation of extracellular adenosine by guanosine. Focus on “Extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels”

<i>Dueling nucleosides: cross-regulation of extracellular adenosine by guanosine</i>. Focus on “Extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels”

Role of RACK1 in the differential proliferative effects of neuropeptide Y1–36 and peptide YY1–36 in SHR vs. WKY preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells

Previous studies show that neuropeptide Y(1-36) (NPY(1-36)) and peptide YY(1-36) (PYY(1-36)), by engaging Y1 receptors, stimulate proliferation of spontaneous hypertensive rat (SHR) preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (PGVSMCs). In contrast, these peptides have little effect on proliferation of Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) PGVSMCs. Why SHR and WKY PGVSMCs differ in this regard is unknown. Because receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1) can modulate cell proliferation, we tested the hypothesis that differences in RACK1 levels/localization may explain the differential response of SHR vs. WKY PGVSMCs to NPY(1-36) and PYY(1-36). Western blotting for RACK1 in subcellular fractions of cultured SHR and WKY PGVSMCs demonstrated increased levels of RACK1 in the membrane and cytoskeletal subcellular fractions of SHR vs. WKY PGVSMCs. NPY(1-36) and PYY(1-36) stimulated proliferation of SHR PGVSMCs, and siRNA knockdown of RACK1 abrogated this effect. Neither NPY(1-36) nor PYY(1-36) stimulated the proliferation of WKY PGVSMCs. However, in WKY PGVSMCs treated with a RACK1 plasmid, both NPY(1-36) and PYY(1-36) stimulated proliferation. In SHR PGVSMCs, inhibitors of the G(i)/phospholipase C/PKC pathway (a pathway known to be organized by RACK1) attenuated the ability of NPY(1-36) to stimulate the proliferation of SHR PGVSMCs. Our results suggest that RACK1 modulates the ability of PGVSMCs to respond to the proliferative actions of NPY(1-36) and PYY(1-36)and differences in RACK1 levels/localization account for, in part, differential proliferative responses to NPY(1-36) and PYY(1-36) in SHR vs. WKY PGVSMCs. Because dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors increase NPY(1-36) and PYY(1-36) levels, our findings have implications for the use of such drugs in diabetic patients.

Nitric Oxide Can Directly Mediate Renin Cell Recruitment

See related article, pp 400–407 In this issue of Hypertension , Neubauer et al1 fit missing pieces into the puzzle of how renin production is controlled, when the demand for renin is high. Our understanding of the acute release of renin is much more complete than what we know about the long-term adaptations to stimuli of renin. Our scarce knowledge of the mechanisms mediating long-term renin stimulation is remarkable with regard to the clinical importance of renin. Hypertension, fluid and electrolyte homeostasis, as well as inflammation and fibrosis all may involve chronic renin stimulation.2 More than 400 million years ago, renin first appeared in organisms,3 and renin is often seen as the first hormone discovered. Shortly before the 20th century, Tigerstedt and Bergman showed that kidney extracts can elevate blood pressure, when intravenously infused.4 Today, we recognize that the actions of renin go far beyond that of controlling blood pressure, and we have detailed insight into how renin is released into the circulation.5 The major stimuli of short-term renin release are blood pressure decreases, β1-adrenergic stimulation, and low salt, whereas …

Extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels

The aim of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels. Rat preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells were incubated with adenosine, guanosine, or both. Guanosine (30 μmol/l) per se had little effect on extracellular adenosine levels. Extracellular adenosine levels 1 h after addition of adenosine (3 μmol/l) were 0.125 ± 0.020 μmol/l, indicating rapid disposition of extracellular adenosine. Extracellular adenosine levels 1 h after addition of adenosine (3 μmol/l) plus guanosine (30 μmol/l) were 1.173 ± 0.061 μmol/l, indicating slow disposition of extracellular adenosine. Cell injury increased extracellular levels of endogenous adenosine and guanosine, and the effects of cell injury on endogenous extracellular adenosine were modulated by altering the levels of endogenous extracellular guanosine with exogenous purine nucleoside phosphorylase (converts guanosine to guanine) or 8-aminoguanosine (inhibits purine nucleoside phosphorylase). Extracellular guanosine also slowed the disposition of extracellular adenosine in rat preglomerular vascular endothelial cells, mesangial cells, cardiac fibroblasts, and kidney epithelial cells and in human aortic and coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells and coronary artery endothelial cells. The effects of guanosine on adenosine levels were not mimicked or attenuated by 5-iodotubericidin (adenosine kinase inhibitor), erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)-adenine (adenosine deaminase inhibitor), 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (guanine deaminase inhibitor), aristeromycin (S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitor), low sodium (inhibits concentrative nucleoside transporters), S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine [inhibits equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) type 1], zidovudine (inhibits ENT type 2), or acadesine (known modulator of adenosine levels). Guanosine also increases extracellular inosine, uridine, thymidine, and cytidine, yet decreases extracellular uric acid. In conclusion, extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels.

Abstract 524: Extracellular Guanosine Regulates Extracellular Adenosine Levels

Extracellular adenosine modulates cardiovascular and renal function. While measuring extracellular purines in biological samples, we observed a correlation between levels of adenosine and guanosine. This observation led us to test the hypothesis that extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels in the cardiovascular and renal systems. Rat preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells in culture were incubated with adenosine and/or guanosine. In the absence of added adenosine, exogenous guanosine (30 μmol/L) had little effect on extracellular adenosine levels, indicating that extracellular guanosine does not trigger the release or production of adenosine. Without added guanosine and 1 hour after adding 3 μmol/L of exogenous adenosine, extracellular adenosine levels were only 0.125 ± 0.020 μmol/L, indicating rapid disposition of extracellular adenosine by a monolayer of cells. In contrast, extracellular adenosine levels 1 hour after adding 3 μmol/L of adenosine plus guanosine (30 μmol/L) were 1.173 ± 0.061 μmol/L (9-fold higher; p&lt;0.0001), indicating slow disposition of extracellular adenosine in the presence of extracellular guanosine. Extracellular guanosine impeded the disposition of extracellular adenosine not only in preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells, but also in rat preglomerular vascular endothelial cells, mesangial cells, cardiac fibroblasts and kidney epithelial cells, as well as in human aortic vascular smooth muscle cells, coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells and coronary artery endothelial cells. In rats, infusions of guanosine per se had little effect on cardiovascular/renal variables, yet markedly enhanced the effects of co-infusions of adenosine. For example, in control rats, adenosine (0.3 μmol/kg/min) only modestly decreased mean arterial blood pressure (from 114 ± 4 to 100 ± 4 mm Hg). In contrast, in guanosine-treated rats (10 μmol/kg/min), adenosine profoundly decreased blood pressure (from 109 ± 4 to 79 ± 3 mm Hg; p&lt;0.0001 vs non-guanosine treated group). Conclusion: Extracellular guanosine powerfully regulates extracellular adenosine levels by altering adenosine disposition and this occurs in many, perhaps most, cell types in the cardiovascular system and kidneys.

Abstract 261: Endothelial Cells Contribute to RAS Activation in Microvascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Introduction: We have demonstrated that Ang II augments angiotensinogen (AGT) expression in rat preglomerular vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). However, it is unclear if endothelial cells (ECs) are involved in augmentation of AGT in renal afferent arterioles. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that the ECs respond to paracrine signals that Ang II contribute to AGT augmentation in VSMCs. Objective: We established primary cultures of preglomerular ECs and examined the effects of Ang II and/or culture medium from ECs on AGT expression in preglomerular VSMCs. Methods and Results: We established primary cultures of preglomerular ECs, isolated from afferent arterioles of Sprague-Dawley rats. The cells were identified as ECs by being positive for a marker, CD34 and endothelial NOS and negative for alpha-SMA (a marker for VSMCs) and P4H-b (a marker for Fibroblasts) by immnostaining. The expression levels of AGT mRNA and renin mRNA in preglomerular ECs were examined by real-time RT-PCR. Ang II (100 pmol/L) increased AGT mRNA levels (1.34 +/- 0.16, by 100 pmol/L, N=4) and Renin mRNA levels (6.16 +/- 0.96, by 100 nmol/L, N=4) in ECs. On the other hand, the same dose of Ang II suppressed Renin mRNA expression in isolated Juxtaglomerular cells (JGs). These results indicate that preglomerular ECs are respond to Ang II and exclude the possible contamination of JGs into ECs. 100 pmol/L of Ang II increased AGT mRNA expression levels (1.37 +/- 0.03, relative ratio, N=4) in preglomerular VSMCs and the culture medium of ECs without Ang II treatment also more increased AGT mRNA expression (1.62 +/- 0.13, relative ratio, N=4) in preglomerular VSMCs. The AGT mRNA expression augmentation was enhanced when preglomerular VSMCs were treated with culture medium of Ang II-treated preglomerular ECs (2.39 +/- 0.41, relative ratio, N=4). The synergistic effects of Ang II and preglomerular ECs were also observed in PAI-1 expression in preglomerular VSMCs. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that preglomerular ECs contribute to Ang II-upregulation of AGT in renal afferent arterioles leading to further Ang II augmentation, which leads to increases in inflammatory and sclerotic factors in preglomerular VSMCs.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Regulates Proliferation of Preglomerular Vascular Smooth Muscle and Mesangial Cells

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of dipeptidyl peptidase IV in regulating the effects of 2 of its substrates, neuropeptide Y(1-36) and peptide YY(1-36), on proliferation of and collagen production by preglomerular vascular smooth muscle and glomerular mesangial cells from spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. In cells from hypertensive rats, neuropeptide Y(1-36) and peptide YY(1-36) stimulated [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation (cell proliferation index), cell number, and [(3)H]-proline incorporation (index of collagen synthesis); and sitagliptin (dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor) significantly enhanced most of these effects. Neuropeptide Y(3-36) and peptide YY(3-36) (products of dipeptidyl peptidase IV) had little effect on [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation, and sitagliptin did not enhance the effects of either peptide. BIBP3226 (Y(1) receptor antagonist) blocked the effects of neuropeptide Y(1-36) and peptide YY(1-36) on [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation in the absence and presence of sitagliptin. Neuropeptide Y(1-36) and peptide YY(1-36) stimulated [(3)H]-thymidine and [(3)H]-proline incorporation and cell number in cells from normotensive rats; however, the effects were weak and mostly not affected by sitagliptin. Real-time PCR and Western blotting showed similar dipeptidyl peptidase IV mRNA and protein levels in cells from hypertensive versus normotensive rats, with greater levels in smooth muscle versus mesangial cells. Both cell types converted peptide YY(1-36) to peptide YY(3-36) in a concentration-dependent manner that was attenuated by sitagliptin, and dipeptidyl peptidase IV activity was greater in smooth muscle versus mesangial cells. In conclusion, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors might entail a risk of renal dysfunction because of abnormal proliferation of cells in the preglomerular microcirculation and glomeruli.