Predictors Of Treatment Retention Research Articles

The impact of emergency guidance to the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment entry, retention and mortality among patients on methadone in Ukraine.

Ukraine's Ministry of Health released urgent COVID-19 guidelines, allowing for early implementation of take-home dosing (THD) for opioid agonist therapies (OAT) such as methadone. Enrollment in OAT and retention in the program are the most effective HIV prevention strategies for people who inject drugs (PWID). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Ukraine's COVID-19 emergency guidance on OAT treatment enrollment, retention on treatment and mortality. Using Ukraine's national OAT registry for 252 governmental clinics across 25 regions, we conducted a 12-month comparative prospective cohort survival analysis. This study compared newly enrolled methadone patients within the initial 6 months following the COVID-19 guidance (COVID) with patients from the preceding year (pre-COVID) in a country with high adult HIV prevalence (1.2%) that is concentrated in PWID. In the nation-wide sample of newly enrolled PWID in Ukraine, comprising 2798 individuals, 1423 were in the COVID cohort and 1375 were in the pre-COVID cohort. The majority were male (86.7%), with an average age of 39.3years. Primary outcomes were average monthly enrollment per cohort, treatment retention and mortality, with internal time-dependent predictors, including THD and optimal (> 85 mg) methadone dosing. Relative to the pre-COVID period, the monthly average patient enrollment was statistically significantly higher during the COVID period (283.7 versus 236.0; P < 0.0001), where patients were more likely to transition to THD and achieve optimal dosing earlier. Significant differences were observed in the proportions of person-months on THD (41 versus 13%, P < 0.0001) and optimal dosing (38 versus 31%, P < 0.0001) between the COVID and pre-COVID cohorts. Predictors of treatment retention, expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), included early THD [aHR = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.47-2.45], early optimal dosing (aHR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.37-2.13) and prior methadone treatment (aHR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.15-1.68). These factors persisted, respectively, in the pre-COVID (aHR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.41-3.70; aHR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.32-2.56; and aHR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06-1.74) and COVID (aHR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.40-2.59; aHR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.20-2.16; and aHR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.08-1.94) cohorts. Survival did not differ significantly between the two prospective cohorts. Ukraine's prompt adoption of early take-home dosing for opioid agonist therapies, such as methadone, following the emergency COVID-19 guidance appears to have increased enrollment into methadone and improved treatment retention for people who inject drugs without adverse effects on patient survival.

Predictors of treatment retention and survival among methadone-maintained patients: A possible role for a functional delta opioid receptor gene variant

BackgroundVariants in the delta opioid receptor gene, OPRD1, were associated with opioid use disorder and response to treatment. The study goal was to assess whether OPRD1 variants predict survival and retention in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). MethodsRetention and survival time since admission (June 1993 - June 2022) until leaving treatment (for retention), or at the end of follow-up (Dec 2022) (for retention and survival) were analyzed in 488 patients. Vital data was taken from a national registry. Predictors were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. ResultsLonger retention and survival were found for carriers of the T allele of SNP rs204076. This SNP is associated with OPRD1 expression in cortex (GTEx). Carriers of the T allele (n = 251) survived longer compared to non-carriers (24.7 vs. 20.2 years, p = 0.005) and had longer retention (11.2 vs. 8.8 years, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis identified the T allele as an independent predictor of longer survival time (p = 0.003) and retention (p = 0.009). Additional predictors for survival were no benzodiazepine use after one year in MMT, no hepatitis C, <20 years of opioid usage, and admission at age < 30. Additional predictors for longer retention were no use of other drugs except opioids on admission, and no drugs at one year, as well as methadone dose ≥ 100mg/d at one year and axis I & II DSM-5 psychiatric diagnosis. ConclusionsThe OPRD1 SNP rs204076 and non-genetic predictors contribute to survival time and retention in MMT patients.

Twelve-month Treatment Retention and Associated Factors: A Comparison of 2 Medically Assisted Therapy Clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Retention in methadone maintenance treatment is instrumental in achieving better treatment outcomes. In this study, we compared 2 medication-assisted treatment (MAT) clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania with respect to patient characteristics, outcomes, and factors that predict 12-month treatment retention. This retrospective registry-based cohort study utilized data collected for routine clinical and program monitoring at 2 sites, Mwananyamala and Muhimbili MAT clinics. Cumulative retention in treatment was calculated using life tables. The analysis of treatment retention predictor variables used both Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. We examined the socio-demographic and program-related characteristics of 362 (181 from each clinic) patients. Twelve-month treatment retention was higher at Mwananyamala (73%) than Muhimbili (64%) MAT clinic, but the difference was not significant. In both clinics, a higher methadone dose (&gt;60mg) significantly predicted treatment retention ( P &lt; 0.05). Being employed and traveling an average short distance (&lt;5 km) from home to clinic significantly increased the likelihood of remaining in treatment in Muhimbili MAT clinic (P&lt; 0.05) only. A methadone dose of 60 mg and above was associated with longer retention in treatment. At 1 clinic in a denser and more central location, employment and a short travel distance from home to clinic were associated with longer tenure in treatment. These findings have potential implications for clinical practice, research, and scaling up MAT services in Tanzania.

The effect of perceived life stress on posttraumatic stress disorder treatment outcome.

Life stress following trauma exposure is a consistent predictor of the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, there is a dearth of research on the effect of life stress on PTSD treatment outcomes. The current study examined the effects of pretreatment levels of perceived life stress on treatment outcome in a sample of 200 individuals with PTSD who were randomized to receive either prolonged exposure (PE) therapy or sertraline as part of a clinical trial. Life stress over the year prior to treatment significantly interacted with treatment type to predict higher residual PTSD symptom severity, as assessed using the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview, among participants who received sertraline but not those who received PE, β = .24, p = .017, ∆R2 = .03. These findings were similar for self-reported depression severity, β = .27, p = .008, ∆R2 = .04. Adherence to either PE homework or sertraline compliance did not mediate this association nor did life stress predict treatment retention for either treatment arm. Higher levels of perceived life stress may serve as a prescriptive predictor of PTSD treatment outcome, with PE remaining efficacious regardless of heightened pretreatment life stress. These findings encourage clinician confidence when providing PE to individuals with higher levels of life stress. Future researchers should examine the impact of PTSD treatment on perceived and objective measures of life stress to improve treatment for individuals who experience chronic stress.

Impact of extended release naltrexone on health-related quality of life in individuals with legal involvement and opioid use disorders

Background: Understanding the impact of medications for opioid use disorder on health related quality of life (QOL) may help to explain why few individuals with legal involvement remain in treatment, specifically those receiving opioid antagonists. QOL is an established predictor of treatment retention and has been shown to improve with some treatment for opioid use disorder. Yet limited research has examined QOL with opioid antagonists. We examined the impact of extended release naltrexone (XR-NTX) on QOL and retention in treatment in a randomized, multi-site trial of individuals with legal involvement. Methods: The participants were 308 community-dwelling adults with current or recent legal involvement with opioid dependence at five site across United States. They were randomized to receive XR-NTX or treatment as usual for 6 months. QOL was measured every 2 weeks using Euro QOL individual items, summary index score, and health state today metric. Results: No significant difference in QOL scores were observed between the two groups at the completion of active treatment or on follow up at 52 and 78 weeks. There were no time effects of treatment on scores. Contrary to expectation, baseline and average QOL did not predict retention in treatment. Conclusion: In contrast to prior research, our findings did not demonstrate significant changes (improvements or decreases) in QOL associated with XR-NTX treatment. Clinicians may consider that individuals receiving XR-NTX may not experience changes in perceived well-being in response to treatment and consider discussing with patients that they may not necessarily perceive improvement in their QOL. This may help to ground patient’s expectations about the effects of treatment and potentially reduce attrition from treatment with opioid antagonists.

The impact of family engagement in opioid assisted treatment: Results from a randomised controlled trial.

Family interventions in substance use disorders (SUD) treatment is limited despite the evidence for benefits. Providing family interventions is hampered by patient resistance, social stigma, logistics and factors related to the capacity of the treatment programmes. The purpose of the study was to examine the association between family engagement in treatment, and opioid use defined by percentage negative opioid screen and rate retention in treatment defined by completion of study period. Data from a 16-week outpatient randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 141 adults with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving Opioid Assisted Treatment (OAT) using buprenorphine/naloxone film (BUP/NX-F) was, used to examine the association between family engagement in and opioid use and rate of retention in treatment. Multiple logistic regression was, applied to examine the independent prediction of family engagement on opioid use and rate retention in treatment. Family engagement was significantly associated with retention in treatment (Spearman's rho 0.25, p < 0.01) and was subsequently found to increase the likelihood of retention in treatment by approximately 3-fold (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.95, 95% CI 1.31-6.65). Family engagement in treatment is an independent predictor of retention in treatment but not opioid use in adults receiving OAT. It is, recommended that SUD treatment programmes integrate family related interventions in mainstream treatment. Delivering a personalised multicomponent family programme using digitised virtual communications that has been increasingly utilised during the Covid-19 pandemic is highly suggested.

Outcomes in Long-term Opioid Tapering and Buprenorphine Transition: A Retrospective Clinical Data Analysis.

There are significant medical risks of long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain. Consequently, there is a need to identify effective interventions for the reduction of high-dose full-agonist opioid medication use. The current study details a retrospective review of 240 patients with chronic pain and LTOT presenting for treatment at a specialty opioid refill clinic. Patients first were initiated on an outpatient taper or, if taper was not tolerated, transitioned to buprenorphine. This study analyzes potential predictors of successful tapering, successful buprenorphine transition, or failure to complete either intervention and the effects of this clinical approach on pain intensity scores. One hundred seven patients (44.6%) successfully tapered their opioid medications under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline target dose (90 mg morphine-equianalgesic dosage), 45 patients (18.8%) were successfully transitioned to buprenorphine, and 88 patients (36.6%) dropped out of treatment: 11 patients during taper, eight during buprenorphine transition, and 69 before initiating either treatment. Conclusions. Higher initial doses of opioids predicted a higher likelihood of requiring buprenorphine transition, and a co-occurring benzodiazepine or z-drug prescription predicted a greater likelihood of dropout from both interventions. Patterns of change in pain intensity according to treatment were mixed: among successfully tapered patients, 52.8% reported greater pain and 23.6% reported reduced pain, whereas 41.8% reported increased pain intensity and 48.8% reported decreased pain after buprenorphine transition. Further research is needed on predictors of treatment retention and dropout, as well as factors that may mitigate elevated pain scores after reduction of opioid dosing.

Mental Health and Psychosocial Needs of Patients Being Treated for Opioid Use Disorder in a Primary Care Residency Clinic.

Purpose: Primary care is an ideal setting to deliver efficacious treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). Primary care providers need to be aware of other concerns patients with OUD might have in order to provide comprehensive care. This study describes the prevalence of mental health, comorbid substance use, and psychosocial concerns of patients seeking treatment for OUD in primary care and their relation to 6-month treatment retention. Methods: Patients (N = 100; M age = 34.9 years (SD = 10.8), 74% white, 46% female) with OUD who were starting treatment with buprenorphine at an academic family medicine residency clinic completed surveys of mental health concerns (depression, anxiety, trauma), psychosocial needs (food insecurity, income, transportation, employment), and demographic variables. Chart reviews were conducted to gather information on comorbid substance use, mental health diagnoses, and 6-month treatment retention. Results: Mental health symptoms were highly prevalent in this sample (44% screened positive for anxiety, 31% for depression, and 52% for posttraumatic stress disorder). Three-quarters reported use of illicit substances other than opioids. Many patients also had significant psychosocial concerns, including unemployment (54%), low income (75%), food insecurity (51%), and lacking reliable transportation (64%). Two-thirds (67%) of the sample were retained at 6 months; patients who previously used intravenous opioids were more likely to discontinue treatment (P = .003). Conclusions: Many patients receiving treatment for OUD have significant mental health problems, comorbid substance use, and psychosocial concerns; interestingly, none of these factors predicted treatment retention at 6 months. Primary care clinics would benefit from having appropriate resources, interventions, and referrals for these comorbid issues in order to enhance overall patient well-being and promote recovery.

Perceived emotion regulation and emotional distress tolerance in patients with hoarding disorder

Emotional distress tolerance (EDT) and emotion regulation (ER) appear to be highly relevant to hoarding pathology, as excessive saving and/or acquiring may be motivated by emotional avoidance or other attempts to regulate negative affect. While findings with nonclinical samples have suggested and EDT/ER predicts hoarding symptoms, there is little data on clinical samples. The aim of the current study was to examine several self-report measures of EDT and ER in individuals with HD (n = 87) and age-matched nonclinical controls (n = 46), and to explore whether this was predictive of treatment compliance and/or outcome in group CBT for HD. Results suggested that, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004) total score, DERS goals and awareness subscales, and Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS; Buhr & Dugas, 2002) were predictive of hoarding severity. However, EDT/ER did not change with treatment, did not mediate treatment outcome, and did not predicted treatment retention, compliance, or outcome. Results suggest that some EDT/ER constructs, such as uncertainty intolerance, difficulty persisting in goal behaviors when upset, and low emotional awareness, may explain significant variance in HD symptoms, although they did not appear to be mechanisms of change in CBT for HD.

Neuropsychological changes in patients with substance use disorder after completion of a one month intensive outpatient treatment program.

Data suggest individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) exhibit high rates of executive functioning (EF) impairment, and that EF level can predict treatment retention. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate if patients who completed a 1 month intensive outpatient program (IOP) for SUD demonstrated recovered EF. Baseline and follow-up neurocognitive functioning was assessed by the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and the self-reported Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF-A) questionnaire. The final sample included 15 patients who completed the one month IOP and for whom data were available (53% male, aged 36 years ± 13.4). Despite exhibiting general improvements in EF and significant improvements in organization, subjects continued to manifest significant executive dysfunction as evaluated by self-report and computerized assessment. Patients with SUD often manifest high levels of executive dysfunction upon entry into SUD treatment that, while improving minimally, appears to persist despite intensive outpatient treatment at 1 month. These persistent EF deficits may affect patient engagement and participation in treatment, thus necessitating SUD programs to assess and accommodate EF issues throughout treatment. (Am J Addict 2018;XX:1-7).

Three-year retention in methadone opioid agonist treatment: A survival analysis of clients by dose, area deprivation, and availability of alcohol and cannabis outlets

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of clinical, socio-demographic, and contextual characteristics on treatment retention in an opioid treatment program (OTP). MethodsA retrospective longitudinal review of 851 clients who received methadone at the only state-funded OTP in Spokane County, Washington between 2015 and 2017. A time variable (the number of days in treatment) and a status indicator (to distinguish between clients who dropped out or censored) worked together to define retention in treatment. Our hypothesized covariates included: area deprivation, distance to the OTP, availability of cannabis retail outlets, availability of on-premise and off-premise alcohol outlets, methadone dosage, age, gender, race, and years on treatment. Cox regression within the family of survival analysis was used to model time-to-event data in the presence of censored cases. ResultsThe median duration of retention was 394 (95%CI = 324–464) days. In the multivariable Cox regression, factors predicting treatment retention were area deprivation (HR = 1.79, 95%CI = 1.02–3.15, p = 0.04), age (HR=0.99, 95%CI=0.98-.99, p = 0.008), dosage of methadone (HR=0.98, 95%CI=0.98-0.98, p < 0.001), and the number of years on treatment (HR=1.12, 95%CI=1.06-1.18, p < 0.001). ConclusionsThe findings of this study showed age and methadone dosage were protective factors and area deprivation and years on treatment were risk factors for treatment retention. After dichotomizing methadone dosage, a unique finding of this study was that higher dosage of methadone did not lead to increasingly smaller HRs for dropping out of treatment. Considering that opioid use disorder is a chronic condition, efforts need to be made to target factors associated with retention.

Who stays in addiction treatment groups? Anxiety and avoidant attachment styles predict treatment retention and relapse.

Attachment styles have been shown to be an important predictor of relationship quality and well-being. They have also been linked with ability to function well in groups. Insecure attachment styles are thought to be an underlying cause of addiction and represent a target for change in one-to-one therapy. How attachment styles themselves affect group therapy for addiction is understudied. The current study addresses this gap by examining the effects of attachment styles on relapse and treatment retention amongst a population of people attending addiction therapy groups. Fifty-eight individuals in such groups completed measures of attachment anxiety and avoidance. Participants were followed up 4weeks later, and their continued treatment attendance and relapse status were recorded. In terms of treatment retention, high anxiety/high avoidant participants had the highest retention. In terms of relapse, low anxiety/high avoidant participants had the lowest rates. These results are discussed in terms of the potentially protective effects of avoidant attachment styles during group therapy and the role of anxiety attachment in the continued maintenance of both protective and risky personal relationships.

Attentional bias toward alcohol stimuli as a predictor of treatment retention in cocaine dependence and alcohol user patients

BackgroundAttentional bias towards substance-related stimuli has shown to be involved in the development and maintenance of cocaine dependence. The relationship between alcohol use and cocaine dependence shown in literature justify the need of study these two substances jointly. MethodsThis paper analyzes patterns of attentional bias in 71 patients with cocaine dependence and compares these patterns according to whether occasional or problematic concurrent alcohol use is taken into account. It also analyzes whether attentional bias towards alcohol and cocaine-related stimuli predicts treatment retention. Attentional bias was evaluated with a visual probe task between 15 and 20days after admission to treatment. Treatment status was recorded at a three-month follow-up. Severity of dependence and cocaine and alcohol craving were also measured. ResultsResults show that patients with cocaine dependence and problematic alcohol use show a pattern of approach towards alcohol stimuli (M=8.32, SD=27.01). In contrast, patients with cocaine dependence with occasional consumption of alcohol exhibit a pattern of avoidance of such stimuli (M=−7.23, SD=19.20) (t=2.79, p=0.007). Logistic regression indicates that alcohol attentional bias is the only variable with predictive capacity (OR=1.05, 95% CI=[1.01, 1.09]). It should also be noted that there is a pattern of avoidance of alcohol stimuli in patients who drop out of treatment. ConclusionThe results of this study suggest the need to delve into whether therapeutic strategies involving deeper emotional processing or avoidance strategies are more suitable for preventing relapse.

Levels of Motivation and Readiness for Treatment Aligned With Criminal Justice Referral and Coercion Among Substance Users in England.

Motivation and readiness for substance misuse treatment predict treatment retention and successful treatment outcomes but may be lower among substance users coerced into treatment. We tested for differences associated with legal involvement and with client perceptions of coercion among individuals entering drug misuse treatment in England. Data collection involved 342 treatment agencies. Measures of motivation and readiness for treatment were taken from the Circumstances, Motivation, and Readiness (CMR) scale. Referral source was ordered to represent level of legal involvement and conditions. Perceived coercion was defined by a CMR item. Linear regression models, adjusting for client complexity, tested for differences in motivation and readiness by these measures. Levels of motivation and readiness did not differ according to level of legal conditions (coefficient = -0.38, 95% CI [-1.65, 0.88]). Motivation was inversely associated with perceived coercion (coefficient = -0.28, 95% CI [-0.05, -0.50], p = .014). At the point of treatment entry, criminal justice referral and aligned conditions have no impact on levels of motivation to achieve positive treatment outcomes. Concerns around lower levels of motivation are better focused on those who perceive themselves as coerced rather than on those whose referral carries a level of legal condition.

A naturalistic study of predictors of retention in treatment among emerging adults entering first buprenorphine maintenance treatment for opioid use disorders

IntroductionEmerging adulthood (between the ages 18–25years) has been conceptualized as a specific developmental stage based on unique psychosocial characteristics. Opioids are commonly used drugs in this population. Few studies have reported predictors of retention in buprenorphine maintenance treatment among opioid-dependent emerging adults, particularly from India. Moreover, no study has examined outcomes with opioid maintenance treatment among emerging adults in non-clinical trial, naturalistic settings. The current study aimed to assess retention in buprenorphine maintenance treatment among emerging adults in a naturalistic setting. Also, it aimed to assess the factors associated with retention in treatment among these individuals. MethodsThe current study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a substance use disorder treatment centre in northern part of India. The patients who received buprenorphine maintenance treatment between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2014 were eligible for inclusion in the current study. The follow–up data of these subjects were assessed up to and including 31st March 2015. Information was retrieved on socio-demographic variables. The information related to substance use included type of substance, duration of use, age of onset, motive of use, route of administration and source of procurement. Additionally, details of buprenorphine dose, dispensing pattern, induction settings were recorded. Cox regression analysis was carried out to assess the predictors of retention in buprenorphine maintenance treatment. ResultsOf 68 emerging adults, 33.8% were retained in treatment at 90days, 19.1% at 6months and 11.7% at one year. After controlling for various covariates in adjusted Cox regression analysis, substance use in first degree relatives (AHR: 2.40, 95% CI 1.33–4.31), lower daily buprenorphine dose (AHR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.94) and past month injection drug use (AHR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.14—0.66) were found to be the significant predictors of treatment dropout. ConclusionsThe findings of the current study help understand the predictors of retention in buprenorphine maintenance treatment among emerging adults in a real-world situation. These findings will help guide formulation of responsive and relevant buprenorphine maintenance treatment program for the emerging adults.

Psychometric evaluation of the Slovenian translation of the Circumstances, Motivation and Readiness Scales

IntroductionAccording to the available data, treatment motivation and readiness are closely linked to retention. There are instruments for measuring the stages of motivation and readiness, and predicting treatment retention and outcome.AimThis study describes psychometric properties, while focusing on the reliability of the Slovenian version of the Circumstances, Motivation and Readiness (CMR) scales.MethodsWe included 109 male and female patients with opioid addiction at the Centre for Treatment of Drug Addiction, Ljubljana. The CMR was translated into Slovenian by using the “forward-backward” procedure by our team and its author. Data analysis addressed psychometric properties of the CMR. Internal consistency was examined by applying exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while reliability was examined with Cronbach's coefficient alpha.ResultsCronbach alpha coefficients of reliability were calculated for each of the three CMR subscales and for the total score. The total alpha was 0.842. Alpha for Motivation was 0.860, for Circumstances 0.372 and for Readiness 0.818. Exploratory factor analysis extracted a 3-factor solution with 56% explained total variance. The factors do not provide an exact match with the dimensions C, M and R.ConclusionOn the basis of these results we can conclude that the Slovenian translation of the CMR is a valid instrument for evaluating patients’ motivation and readiness for treatment.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Opioid use following an outpatient detoxification and induction onto XR-NTX: Testing the blockade as a predictor of retention in treatment

Opioid use following an outpatient detoxification and induction onto XR-NTX: Testing the blockade as a predictor of retention in treatment

Early Therapeutic Alliance, Treatment Retention, and 12-Month Outcomes in a Healthy Lifestyles Intervention for People with Psychotic Disorders.

Engaging and retaining individuals with psychotic disorders in psychosocial treatments is difficult. Early therapeutic alliance, treatment retention, and 12-month outcomes were examined in a subsample of smokers with a psychotic disorder (N = 178) participating in a healthy lifestyles study comparing a telephone versus face-to-face delivered intervention. Therapeutic alliance was assessed using the Agnew Relationship Measure; primary outcomes were treatment retention and changes in symptoms and health behaviors. Contrary to expectations, early alliance did not predict treatment retention. However, elements of both client- and therapist-rated alliance predicted some clinical outcomes (e.g., higher confidence in the therapeutic alliance at session 1 predicted improvements in 12-month depression). Some modest interactions between early alliance and intervention condition were also identified (e.g., clients initially with lower self-perceived initiative, or higher therapist-perceived bonding benefited preferentially from the telephone-delivered intervention), highlighting the need to further examine the interplay between therapeutic alliance and treatment modality.

In Vivo Feedback Predicts Parent Behavior Change in the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up Intervention

Understanding mechanisms and active ingredients of intervention is critical to training clinicians, particularly when interventions are transported from laboratories to communities. One promising active ingredient of parenting programs is clinicians’ in vivo feedback regarding parent–child interactions. The present study examined whether a form of in vivo feedback, in the moment commenting, predicted treatment retention and parent behavior change when the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) intervention was implemented in a community setting. Observational data were collected from 78 parent–child dyads (96% mothers; M age = 29 years; 81% minority; infants’ M age = 12 months; 90% minority) across 640 sessions conducted by 9 clinicians (100% female, M age = 39; 67% minority) in Hawaii. Parental behavior was assessed with a semistructured play task before and after intervention. Clinicians’ in-the-moment feedback to parents was assessed from intervention session videos. Clinicians’ frequency and quality of in-the-moment feedback predicted change in parental intrusiveness and sensitivity at posttreatment. Frequency of in-the-moment feedback also predicted likelihood of retention. Hierarchical linear modeling demonstrated strong support for these associations at the between-clinician level, and limited additional support at the within-clinician (i.e., between-case) level. Thus, a hypothesized active ingredient of treatment, in-the-moment feedback, predicted community-based ABC outcomes. The results complement lab-based evidence to suggest that in vivo feedback may be a mechanism of change in parenting interventions. Helping clinicians to provide frequent, high-quality in vivo feedback may improve parenting program outcomes in community settings.

Predictors of retention in treatment in a tertiary care de-addiction center.

Context:Retention in treatment can improve the outcomes of patients with substance use disorders.Aims:This study aimed to assess the predictors of treatment retention in a set of patients admitted with substance use disorders.Setting and Design:This record-based study was conducted among consecutive patients discharged from the inpatient unit of a tertiary care de-addiction facility in Northern India.Materials and Methods:Patients were classified as being retained in treatment or drop-outs based on follow-up records.Statistical Analysis:Those who were retained and those who dropped out were compared using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests. Logistic regression was used to find out the predictors of retention in treatment.Results:A total of 88 case records were evaluated. All subjects were males and majority of the sample was married, educated up to 10th grade, employed, belonged to the nuclear family and urban background. Opioid dependence syndrome (96.6%) was the most common substance use disorder identified. Guilt feelings, general weakness of body, and loss of social respect were the most common substance-related complications experienced. Of the total sample, 40 (45.4%) were classified as retained into treatment. Higher socioeconomic status and having a family member with substance use was associated with higher chances of treatment retention.Conclusion:Identification of patient characteristics predicting drop-outs can help in targeting those individuals at higher risk. This can help in more favorable patient outcomes.