Predator Use Research Articles

Predator manipulation by volatiles.

Predator manipulation by volatiles.

A healthy but depleted herd: Predators decrease prey disease and density.

The healthy herds hypothesis proposes that predators can reduce parasite prevalence and thereby increase the density of their prey. However, evidence for such predator-driven reductions in the prevalence of prey remains mixed. Furthermore, even less evidence supports increases in prey density during epidemics. Here, we used a planktonic predator-prey-parasite system to experimentally test the healthy herds hypothesis. We manipulated density of a predator (the phantom midge, Chaoborus punctipennis) and parasitism (the virulent fungus Metschnikowia bicuspidata) in experimental assemblages. Because we know natural populations of the prey (Daphnia dentifera) vary in susceptibility to both predator and parasite, we stocked experimental populations with nine genotypes spanning a broad range of susceptibility to both enemies. Predation significantly reduced infection prevalence, eliminating infection at the highest predation level. However, lower parasitism did not increase densities of prey; instead, prey density decreased substantially at the highest predation levels (a major density cost of healthy herds predation). This density result was predicted by a model parameterized for this system. The model specifies three conditions for predation to increase prey density during epidemics: (i) predators selectively feed on infected prey, (ii) consumed infected prey release fewer infectious propagules than unconsumed prey, and (iii) sufficiently low infection prevalence. While the system satisfied the first two conditions, prevalence remained too high to see an increase in prey density with predation. Low prey densities caused by high predation drove increases in algal resources of the prey, fueling greater reproduction, indicating that consumer-resource interactions can complicate predator-prey-parasite dynamics. Overall, in our experiment, predation reduced the prevalence of a virulent parasite but, at the highest levels, also reduced prey density. Hence, while healthy herds predation is possible under some conditions, our empirical results make it clear that the manipulation of predators to reduce parasite prevalence may harm prey density.

Meta-analysis of tadpole taste tests: consumption of anuran prey across development and predator strategies.

The risk of predation and the costs and benefits of diverse anti-predator strategies can shift across the life stages of an organism. Yet, empirical examples of ontogenetic switches in defense mechanisms are scarce. Anurans represent an alleged exception; previous meta-analytic work suggests that unpalatability of developing anurans is "rare", whereas adult anurans in many lineages are well defended by toxic and/or unpalatable skin secretions. Here, we revisit the question of the unpalatability of anuran young in a meta-analysis of the relative proportion of prey consumed within 922 predation tests, including 135 anuran species. We tested the hypotheses that a predator's propensity to consume anuran young depends on (1) prey family, (2) predator manipulation strategy, and (3) prey ontogenetic stage. We used a binomial mixed model approach with considerations for multiple effect sizes within studies to evaluate the log odds ratio of the proportion of prey consumed by individual predators. Prey consumption was highly variable, but toads (Bufonidae) were consumed in lower proportions. Chewing invertebrates consumed more anuran prey than biting vertebrates. Late stage tadpoles were more vulnerable to predation than other stages of anuran ontogeny. However, more studies are needed to unravel the roles of development and evolutionary history in the chemical ecology of anuran young. This synthesis provides clear meta-analytic evidence that relative unpalatability is an important component in the anti-predator defenses of young in some anuran families, calling into question the degree to which chemically defended anuran families undergo ontogenetic switches in anti-predator strategies.

Adaptive divergence of lateral plate ultrastructure in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)

The lateral plates of threespine stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus Linnaeus, 1758) are well studied for their adaptive morphological responses to predators, yet it is unknown whether habitat influences plate ultrastructure. We investigated using scanning electron microscopy the lateral plate ultrastructure (tubercles and ridges) of stickleback ( N = 61 adult fish) from nine Haida Gwaii (coastal British Columbia, Canada) wild-type populations, two experimental transplants, and two lab-reared cohorts reared from source populations. Tubercle density, but not ridge density, differed significantly across habitat types and populations. Among wild-type fish, tubercle densities were greatest in dystrophic habitats containing predatory fish, and lowest in weakly dystrophic systems featuring bird–invertebrate predation and marine populations with diverse predatory fish. No differences in tubercle density were detected between source and transplant populations, despite major habitat shifts. Lab-reared fish exhibited significantly lower tubercle densities than their source populations (less than one generation). Tubercle density differences across habitat types may reflect adaptation to divergent predation regimes, with tooth-bearing predators selecting for denser tubercles that disperse point forces. Conservation of ridge density across populations suggests an essential function in dispersing forces applied to dorsal spines during predator manipulation. Lateral plate ultrastructure in threespine stickleback thus results from both heritable effects and developmental plasticity.

Fear of predators in free-living wildlife reduces population growth over generations

Correctly assessing the total impact of predators on prey population growth rates (lambda, λ) is critical to comprehending the importance of predators in species conservation and wildlife management. Experiments over the past decade have demonstrated that the fear (antipredator responses) predators inspire can affect prey fecundity and early offspring survival in free-living wildlife, but recent reviews have highlighted the absence of evidence experimentally linking such effects to significant impacts on prey population growth. We experimentally manipulated fear in free-living wild songbird populations over three annual breeding seasons by intermittently broadcasting playbacks of either predator or nonpredator vocalizations and comprehensively quantified the effects on all the components of population growth, together with evidence of a transgenerational impact on offspring survival as adults. Fear itself significantly reduced the population growth rate (predator playback mean λ = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.04; nonpredator mean λ = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.16) by causing cumulative, compounding adverse effects on fecundity and every component of offspring survival, resulting in predator playback parents producing 53% fewer recruits to the adult breeding population. Fear itself was consequently projected to halve the population size in just 5 years, or just 4 years when the evidence of a transgenerational impact was additionally considered (λ = 0.85). Our results not only demonstrate that fear itself can significantly impact prey population growth rates in free-living wildlife, comparing them with those from hundreds of predator manipulation experiments indicates that fear may constitute a very considerable part of the total impact of predators.

Mobile piscivores and the nature of top-down forcing in Upper Amazonian floodplain lakes

Shallow lakes can change states in response to manipulations of top predators. In most reported experiments, the top piscivore has been a fish. However, low-latitude lakes typically support non-piscine piscivores, including mammals, birds, and reptiles. The roles of these groups have been little investigated, and whether they are more important as piscivores than fish remains unknown. We report both a longitudinal (2001–2018) and a cross-sectional (2012) study of the bird, caiman, and giant otter populations of floodplain lakes in Peru’s Manu National Park. We compare the three groups, after removing the effects of taxonomic status and body mass, using allometric equations to estimate the field metabolic rate (FMR) for each group in each lake. Giant otters emerge as the dominant piscivore in lakes that support a resident family, with an energy requirement more than twice that of piscivorous birds and more than seven times that of caiman. However, giant otters were resident in only eight of 27 surveyed lakes. Indirect evidence suggests that these eight lakes are more productive than lakes not occupied by otters. The fact that lakes occupied by otters are dominated by phytoplankton suggests an underlying five-tiered trophic structure in keeping with the prominence of alternating levels in the structure of food webs.

Invasive mammalian predators habituate to and generalize avian prey cues: a mechanism for conserving native prey.

Invasive mammalian predators can cause the decline and extinction of vulnerable native species. Many invasive mammalian predators are dietary generalists that hunt a variety of prey. These predators often rely upon olfaction when foraging, particularly at night. Little is understood about how prey odor cues are used to inform foraging decisions. Prey cues can vary spatially and temporally in their association with prey and can either reveal the location of prey or lead to unsuccessful foraging. Here we examine how two wild-caught invasive mammalian bird predator species (European hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and ferrets Mustela putorius furo) respond to unrewarded bird odors over successive exposures, first demonstrating that the odors are perceptually different using house mice (Mus musculus) as a biological olfactometer. We aim to test if introduced predators categorize odor cues of similar prey together, a tactic that could increase foraging efficiency. We exposed house mice to the odors using a standard habituation/dishabituation test in a laboratory setting, and wild-caught European hedgehogs and ferrets in an outdoor enclosure using a similar procedure. Mice discriminated among all bird odors presented, showing more interest in chicken odor than quail or gull odor. Both predator species showed a decline in interest toward unrewarded prey odor (i.e., habituation), but only ferrets generalized their response from one unrewarded bird odor to another bird odor. Hedgehog responses to unrewarded bird odors were highly variable between individuals. Taken together, our results reveal interspecific and intraspecific differences in response to prey odors, which we argue are a consequence of different diet breadth, life and evolutionary histories, and the conditions in each experiment. Generalization of prey odors may have enabled some species of invasive predators to efficiently hunt a range of intraguild prey species, for example, ground-nesting shorebirds. Olfactory manipulation of predators may be a useful conservation tool for threatened prey if it reduces the conspicuousness of vulnerable prey.

Limitations of Active Removal to Manage Predatory Fish Populations

AbstractPrograms to control predatory fishes have successfully increased the survival of imperiled prey fishes in some cases, but efficacy depends on the population dynamics and ecological interactions between the predators, prey, and the rest of the community. In California's Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, extremely low survival of downstream‐migrating juvenile salmonids has been ascribed in part to predation by abundant nonnative fishes that have become naturalized in the system. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of removing some of these predatory fish to increase the survival of juvenile salmonids in the San Joaquin River. In 2014 and 2015, we used predation event recorders (PERs) to estimate predation rates before and after localized, experimental predatory fish removals and additions. We also estimated survival of juvenile Chinook SalmonOncorhynchus tshawytschabefore and after predator manipulations in 2014 using acoustic tags. We found no statistically significant evidence for an effect of predator removals or additions on survival rates of Chinook Salmon (as measured by acoustic tags) or on predation rates (as measured byPERs), despite a one‐time reduction of approximately 40–70% of all predators from “removal” sites and relocation to “addition” sites. We review examples of successful predator control programs elsewhere, highlighting key differences between those programs and our study in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta.

Enhancing predator efficiency, the recent advances

Three biocontrol methods include classical biological control, augmentation and conservation (CBC). Among them, CBC includes different agricultural compatible methods, which try to build up natural enemy populations and consequently improve biological control. Some of the most common conservation methods include providing shelter (e.g. beetle banks and hedgerows), supplementary foods (pollen and nectar), providing overwintering sites, increasing landscape biodiversity and nesting. Furthermore, cover crops, living mulches, which buffer the harsh environmental conditions, strip harvesting are among the other most common methods. Recently, genetic manipulation of predators has been considered as a potential strategy in biological control. This strategy aimed to manipulate beneficial genetically to more tolerant them against adverse effect of pesticides and environmental condition or increase their predation (parasitism rate). We tried to review a growing body of conservation studies focusing on practices promoting predator efficacy and performance. We will discuss how CBC practices contribute to improve pest control.

Levels of predator movement between crop and neighboring habitats explain pest suppression in soybean across a gradient of agricultural landscape complexity

Landscape complexity has been shown to play an important role in determining the levels of pests and predators found in agricultural fields. Although movement of predators between landscape habitats and crop fields is a crucial mechanism mediating landscape effects on pest control services, this has rarely been quantified in agroecosystems. Here we evaluated the relationship among agricultural landscape complexity, levels of predator movement and the suppression of soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumara, in 27 soybean fields in Manitoba. Over a two-year period, we quantified soybean aphid suppression using predator manipulation treatments, predator movement using bi-directional Malaise traps, and landscape complexity using digital maps of the area within a 2 km radius of the focal fields studied. When aphids were exposed to predation, population growth was reduced by 73.7% on average (range: 38.3%–95.6%) compared to aphid populations protected with predator exclusion cages. Bi-directional Malaise trap and sweep-net sampling indicated that hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae), followed by minute pirate bugs (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) were the numerically dominant predators. Focal fields were located in landscapes with a range of 0.3–40.3% of woodland, with soybean, cereals, and canola as the other major land-cover types present. Final aphid population size showed a negative association with the proportion of cereals and positive associations with the proportion of woodland and field border grass in the landscape. Levels of predator movement between soybean and neighboring habitats had negative associations with final aphid population size, and were the best predictors in the statistical models, either alone or combined with independent landscape complexity variables. Our results provide the first empirical evidence that landscape effects on pest suppression can be explained by the contribution of predators from extra-field habitats. From a management perspective, these results suggest that higher levels of pest suppression can be achieved by designing landscapes that facilitate predator movement to crops from extra-field habitats.

Habitat characteristics with an. barbirostris larva density in Bulukumba

Bulukumba is a malaria endemic area in South Sulawesi with malaria cases reported annually, An.barbirostris as a potential vector of malaria in the area. This study aims to analyze habitat characteristics with a density of An. barbirostris larvae The method used is an observational study with ecological survey design through the cross-sectional approach of samples in the form of Anopheles larvae habitat. Bivariate analysis shows physical, chemical, and biological environmental factors. water temperature significant to the density of larva An.barbirostris with p-value = 0,002. Multivariate test using linear regression to know the most influential variables, it is known that the variables that have the most influence on the density of larvae An. barbirostris in endemic area Bulukumba is water temperature p = 0,002. Environmental factors such as salinity, aquatic plant, plants around, predators and crops along with water temperature are factors that support the density of An. barbirostris larvae Control can be done with environmental management, especially interventions on Anopheles sp larvae breeding habitat, by sowing predator fish seeds, habitat modification and manipulation. modification of anopheles habitat by covering habitats and carrying out development can reduce larval nutrition so as to reduce carbon in the soil which results in a decrease in larval density.

Top‐down control as important as nutrient enrichment for eutrophication effects in North Atlantic coastal ecosystems

Summary Seagrass and seaweed habitats constitute hotspots for diversity and ecosystem services in coastal ecosystems. These habitats are subject to anthropogenic pressures, of which eutrophication is one major stressor. Eutrophication favours fast‐growing ephemeral algae over perennial macroalgae and seagrasses, causing habitat degradation. However, changes in top‐down control, caused by, for example, overfishing, may also have negative impacts on such habitats by decreasing grazer control of ephemeral algae. Meanwhile, systematic analyses estimating top‐down effects of predator manipulations across a wide range of studies are missing, limiting the potential use of top‐down control measures in coastal management. Here, we review the literature on experiments that test top‐down and bottom‐up controls in seagrass Zostera marina and seaweed Fucus spp. food webs in the North Atlantic. Using meta‐analysis and meta‐regression, we compare effect sizes of consumer and nutrient manipulations on primary producers, grazers and mesopredators. Presence of mesopredators on average doubled the biomass of ephemeral algae through trophic cascades, mainly mediated via negative effects on amphipods and isopods. Of the grazers, gastropods had twice as strong a negative effect on ephemeral algae as amphipods/isopods, but responded weakly to both predators and fertilization. In accordance with theory, top‐down effects became stronger with eutrophication. Across studies, top‐down effects on ephemeral algae at all trophic levels are on par with eutrophication effects. However, the few studies manipulating piscivorous fish make estimates of their top‐down effects uncertain. Synthesis and applications. Consistently strong top‐down effects in coastal ecosystems call for an integrated ecosystem perspective. Management should consider measures to improve stocks of predatory fish and reduce mesopredators for restoration and conservation of essential seagrass and seaweed habitats, thereby increasing the long‐term viability of ecosystem services from coastal habitats.

Cascading effects of belowground predators on plant communities are density-dependent.

Soil food webs comprise a multitude of trophic interactions that can affect the composition and productivity of plant communities. Belowground predators feeding on microbial grazers like Collembola could decelerate nutrient mineralization by reducing microbial turnover in the soil, which in turn could negatively influence plant growth. However, empirical evidences for the ecological significance of belowground predators on nutrient cycling and plant communities are scarce. Here, we manipulated predator density (Hypoaspis aculeifer: predatory mite) with equal densities of three Collembola species as a prey in four functionally dissimilar plant communities in experimental microcosms: grass monoculture (Poa pratensis), herb monoculture (Rumex acetosa), legume monoculture (Trifolium pratense), and all three species as a mixed plant community. Density manipulation of predators allowed us to test for density-mediated effects of belowground predators on Collembola and lower trophic groups. We hypothesized that predator density will reduce Collembola population causing a decrease in nutrient mineralization and hence detrimentally affect plant growth. First, we found a density-dependent population change in predators, that is, an increase in low-density treatments, but a decrease in high-density treatments. Second, prey suppression was lower at high predator density, which caused a shift in the soil microbial community by increasing the fungal: bacterial biomass ratio, and an increase of nitrification rates, particularly in legume monocultures. Despite the increase in nutrient mineralization, legume monocultures performed worse at high predator density. Further, individual grass shoot biomass decreased in monocultures, while it increased in mixed plant communities with increasing predator density, which coincided with elevated soil N uptake by grasses. As a consequence, high predator density significantly increased plant complementarity effects indicating a decrease in interspecific plant competition. These results highlight that belowground predators can relax interspecific plant competition by increasing nutrient mineralization through their density-dependent cascading effects on detritivore and soil microbial communities.

An island-wide predator manipulation reveals immediate and long-lasting matching of risk by prey.

Anti-predator behaviour affects prey population dynamics, mediates cascading effects in food webs and influences the likelihood of rapid extinctions. Predator manipulations in natural settings provide a rare opportunity to understand how prey anti-predator behaviour is affected by large-scale changes in predators. Here, we couple a long-term, island-wide manipulation of an important rodent predator, the island fox (Urocyon littoralis), with nearly 6 years of measurements on foraging by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) to provide unequivocal evidence that prey closely match their foraging behaviour to the number of fox predators present on the island. Peromyscus maniculatus foraging among exposed and sheltered microhabitats (a measure of aversion to predation risk) closely tracked fox density, but the nature of this effect depended upon nightly environmental conditions known to affect rodent susceptibility to predators. These effects could not be explained by changes in density of deer mice over time. Our work reveals that prey in natural settings are cognizant of the dynamic nature of their predators over timescales that span many years, and that predator removals spanning many generations of prey do not result in a loss of anti-predator behaviour.

Burrowing behavior of an infaunal clam species after siphon nipping

Burial depth plays an important role in the life of many infaunal clam species. For these organisms, the most effective defense against predation is to bury into the sediment, which hinder the detection and manipulation of predators. In laboratory conditions, we examined Mesodesma mactroides normal burial depth recovery after two artificial siphon nipping levels (1cm and 5cm). The 1cm siphon nipping experiment was repeated in winter and spring to evaluate if burial depth recovery differs between seasons. The data of normal burial depth (uncut clams) were fitted using linear mixed-effects models, and the data of burial depth recovery (cut clams) were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects models. In the latter case, three candidate models were tested with each depth data set to explain the normal burial depth recovery at the two cut levels and seasons. The logistic model best explained the recovery of normal burial depth after siphon nipping in M. mactroides. The normal burial depth (uncut clams) did not vary among the studied seasons (winter and spring). On the other hand, there was a synergic effect between seasonality and siphon nipping on clam normal burial depth recovery, being faster in spring than in winter. Lastly, the clams with 5cm siphon nipping had a delay in recovering the normal burial depth in comparison to clams with 1cm siphon nipping. Thus, our results show that the temporal window of lethal predation risk could increase according to the level of siphon nipping and the season in which occurs.

A natural antipredation experiment: predator control and reduced sea ice increases colony size in a long-lived duck.

Anthropogenic impact on the environment and wildlife are multifaceted and far-reaching. On a smaller scale, controlling for predators has been increasing the yield from local natural prey resources. Globally, human-induced global warming is expected to impose severe negative effects on ecosystems, an effect that is expected to be even more pronounced in the scarcely populated northern latitudes. The clearest indication of a changing Arctic climate is an increase in both air and ocean temperatures leading to reduced sea ice distribution. Population viability is for long-lived species dependent on adult survival and recruitment. Predation is the main mortality cause in many bird populations, and egg predation is considered the main cause of reproductive failure in many birds. To assess the effect of predation and climate, we compared population time series from a natural experiment where a trapper/down collector has been licensed to actively protect breeding common eiders Somateria mollissima (a large seaduck) by shooting/chasing egg predators, with time series from another eider colony located within a nature reserve with no manipulation of egg predators. We found that actively limiting predator activity led to an increase in the population growth rate and carrying capacity with a factor of 3–4 compared to that found in the control population. We also found that population numbers were higher in years with reduced concentration of spring sea ice. We conclude that there was a large positive impact of human limitation of egg predators, and that this lead to higher population growth rate and a large increase in size of the breeding colony. We also report a positive effect of warming climate in the high arctic as reduced sea-ice concentrations was associated with higher numbers of breeding birds.

Predator-induced reduction of freshwater carbon dioxide emissions

Predators can potentially influence the exchange of carbon dioxide between ecosystems and the atmosphere. Predator manipulation experiments with fish and invertebrates in a range of freshwater systems suggest that freshwater carbon dioxide emissions are reduced in the presence of predators.

Intraguild relationships between sympatric predators exposed to lethal control: predator manipulation experiments

IntroductionTerrestrial top-predators are expected to regulate and stabilise food webs through their consumptive and non-consumptive effects on sympatric mesopredators and prey. The lethal control of top-predators has therefore been predicted to inhibit top-predator function, generate the release of mesopredators and indirectly harm native fauna through trophic cascade effects. Understanding the outcomes of lethal control on interactions within terrestrial predator guilds is important for zoologists, conservation biologists and wildlife managers. However, few studies have the capacity to test these predictions experimentally, and no such studies have previously been conducted on the eclectic suite of native and exotic, mammalian and reptilian taxa we simultaneously assess. We conducted a series of landscape-scale, multi-year, manipulative experiments at nine sites spanning five ecosystem types across the Australian continental rangelands to investigate the responses of mesopredators (red foxes, feral cats and goannas) to contemporary poison-baiting programs intended to control top-predators (dingoes) for livestock protection.ResultShort-term behavioural releases of mesopredators were not apparent, and in almost all cases, the three mesopredators we assessed were in similar or greater abundance in unbaited areas relative to baited areas, with mesopredator abundance trends typically either uncorrelated or positively correlated with top-predator abundance trends over time. The exotic mammals and native reptile we assessed responded similarly (poorly) to top-predator population manipulation. This is because poison baits were taken by multiple target and non-target predators and top-predator populations quickly recovered to pre-control levels, thus reducing the overall impact of baiting on top-predators and averting a trophic cascade.ConclusionsThese results are in accord with other predator manipulation experiments conducted worldwide, and suggest that Australian populations of native prey fauna at lower trophic levels are unlikely to be negatively affected by contemporary dingo control practices through the release of mesopredators. We conclude that contemporary lethal control practices used on some top-predator populations do not produce the conditions required to generate positive responses from mesopredators. Functional relationships between sympatric terrestrial predators may not be altered by exposure to spatially and temporally sporadic application of non-selective lethal control.

An experimental test of the response of macroecological patterns to altered species interactions

Macroecological patterns such as the species-area relationship (SAR), the species-abundance distribution (SAD), and the species-time relationship (STR) exhibit regular behavior across ecosystems and taxa. However, determinants of these patterns remain poorly understood. Emerging theoretical frameworks for macroecology attempt to understand this regularity by ignoring detailed ecological interactions and focusing on the influence of a small number of community-level state variables, such as species richness and total abundance, on these patterns. We present results from a 15-year rodent removal experiment evaluating the response of three different macroecological patterns in two distinct annual plant communities (summer and winter) to two levels of manipulated seed predation. Seed predator manipulations significantly impacted species composition on all treatments in both communities, but did not significantly impact richness, community abundance, or macroecological patterns in most cases. How'ever, winter community abundance and richness responded significantly to the removal of all rodents. Changes in richness and abundance were coupled with significant shifts in macroecological patterns (SADs, SARs, and STRs). Because altering species interactions only impacted macroecological patterns when the state variables of abundance and richness also changed, we suggest that, in this system, local-scale processes primarily act indirectly through these properties to determine macroecological patterns.

Larval density dependence in Anopheles gambiae s.s., the major African vector of malaria.

Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto is the most important vector of malaria in Africa although relatively little is known about the density-dependent processes determining its population size. Mosquito larval density was manipulated under semi-natural conditions using artificial larval breeding sites placed in the field in coastal Kenya; two experiments were conducted: one manipulating the density of a single cohort of larvae across a range of densities and the other employing fewer densities but with the treatments crossed with four treatments manipulating predator access. In the first experiment, larval survival, development rate and the size of the adult mosquito all decreased with larval density (controlling for block effects between 23% and 31% of the variance in the data could be explained by density). In the second experiment, the effects of predator manipulation were not significant, but again we observed strong density dependence in larval survival (explaining 30% of the variance). The results are compared with laboratory studies of A.gambiae larval competition and the few other studies conducted in the field, and the consequences for malaria control are discussed.